TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GoBYu40 Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by GoBYu40 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I was just wondering who the beta males were that read people like this. I can write well. i have written for newspapers and have had many articles published from PR pieces created. I could write a great blog. But I don't think anyone would read it. just wondering how this idiots blog made it all around twitter and reddit having all these readers respond to her piece.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 08:39 PM
3

Well, in every day life you may hit a buddy in the arm. But you'd never hit him in the sack. But in a Street fight when your life is at stake you're going to rip his nuts off if you have too. I'll definitely hit someone there if I'm in a Street fight. No rules other than surviving apply. But in everyday life. No. Not going in the neighborhood.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:14 PM
1

I got that. If it wasn't archived i would not have visited the site to read it. My point was we only read it because it was brought to our attention by others. But for them, or somewhere in the line there have to just be people reading this junk because they wanted to. Like the writer (term used loosely) said, a whole host of men commented in agreement with the article. Who are these betas? They obviously don't have testicles if they can be kicked in the crotch and it doesn't hurt.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:58 AM
19

We don't do it because it F-ing hurts. Wtf? How does a written piece like this get any response besides that? Who's reading it, besides those of us that saw your post? The person who wrote that shouldn't say things out loud much less write them down and show them to the internet. But also who are the even crazier people giving it legitimacy by reading and responding to it with any other response other than it hurts, it could cause infertility, etc.?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:32 AM
1

She's found her niche in man hating liberal feminism. She retweets all kinds of articles that are completely fake news with click bait headlines. As it becomes less popular in the mainstream for this type of liberal feminism she'll have to go deeper down that rabbit hole to keep her income stream. Then she will begin to propagate some really dangerous ideals.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 05:27 PM
14

Ms. Skog says "men's penises should be cut off. That is space we are giving to men that could be given more equally to women." /s Give me a break.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:28 PM
2

NO law stating your job has to allow you off to strike. So enjoy unemployment. Then sue your boss for sexism/discrimination. I think the men at these companies should have a 2 hour steak and scotch lunch that day.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:50 PM
1

I didn't. I refuted the source because it is a piece of propaganda with an agenda. And I rejected it because the images of the penis with the foreskin pulled back look just like a circumcised penis, not the mutilated penis described by the person presenting me the source link. So you need to read what I wrote before you verbalize your incorrect assumptions.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 09:40 PM
1

not trust worthy. unfortunately that is how it works.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 12:53 AM
0

that is propaganda they have a book that is anti circumcision. Not an impartial source.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 12:06 AM
0

Yeah, i looked at the drawings. I have everything that is there except excess skin. I don't know if you have only seen horribly botched jobs where the entire head is lobbed off, but if down correctly it should look and be exactly as an uncut penis with the skin pulled back. I do not know what you're used to seeing.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:22 PM
0

Skin isn't that sensitive. I just disagree on the severity of "bad" and the "evidence." it is okay. Find someone to talk to. I talked about it way more than I intended.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:44 PM
1

Well we can agree to disagree. I think being angry at someone for something like that is ignorant. If you don't actually know that what they did was something bad, because you have lived with this your whole life, then get over it. I think some people just don't see it as a big deal that merits hate fielded rhetoric and feelings.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:39 PM
1

I don't live in a bubble and have not been brainwashed. You are making assumptions I have had deep philosophical conversations with someone in my life about my penis being circumcised. This is the first time. Congrats. And you have definitely not swayed me to your point of view with those heavy handed generalities. Hey. It wouldn't be the first or probably the last time I get cheated. And, I don't feel cheated. See you can't miss something you never knew you had. I love how my dick looks. It is …
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:57 PM
0

They aren't my stats. They are facts. I thought it would have been a minority. I was wrong. And I do not live world wide. So I do not care about world wide stats. Dude. I think ya'll are taking this topic way to seriously. why are you so angry about circumcision? Damn. I don't even care that much about it. Just said I was glad I was cut. Of all the tragedies happening in the world this is like a hangnail. Not that important. Chill.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:31 PM
1

Doesn't matter to me which they prefer. They can ask men on their dates if they are cut or not and then dump the men that aren't. It doesn't bother me. and if that is the sole deciding factor why a woman is with me, then I don't want her around anyway.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 08:18 PM
1

It is the exact same thing. Actually it is a much stronger argument that a parent clipping a little skin is less damaging than chopping off the entire thing. You cannot pick and choose. Either you are for or against parent's rights. Either you are for or against parents' rights to make medical decisions on behalf of a minor child. There is no, yes for this and no for that.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 08:17 PM
2

That is their claim. I can make all kind of excuses for every shitting thing that ever happened in my life. But I won't.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 08:14 PM
1

Okay. So then by your argument All parents that allow their children to become transgendered before they turn 18 is in the same criminal boat. I feel ya. No permanently removing pieces of your body before you turn 18.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:41 PM
0

Because no man is going to do that. And you know that which is why it is your argument. I had my teeth fall out as a child. But I wouldn't want to have that happen as an adult. There are a lot of things we go through as children that are totally okay that we wouldn't wish to deal with as an adult.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:56 PM
0

Yeah, there is difference between a desire to last longer and premature. It isn't a this or that thing. I could go for 30 minutes or 2 hours but still wish I could go longer maybe. you have no idea. but in your small minded world, a desire to be the best in bed means one is totally inadequate. You have just invalidated everything you have previously stated by being completely ridiculous right there.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:48 PM
0

I don't know how you can be confused by me. I have been consistent with my statements. What you mean to say is "I don't agree with you so you are wrong and here is why based on my personal opinion." I think it is something that doesn't matter. The child will not be affected one way or the other. So, if a parent decides they want to have a child circumcised who cares? I was and I am glad.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:45 PM
-1

There is supposed to be a section under the head of the penis called the "frenulum" which looks like the part of your tongue that connects to your mouth, That is there. And I don't need my penis to be more sensitive. Trust me I wish it was less sensitive much of the time. You say it is strange for me to think that? I believe most studies have found that most men, over 50% at least wish to last longer in bed. No matter how long they currently last. So I am not in the minority, but the majority.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:36 PM
-3

There is no hypocrisy in my statement. What my statement meant was that it is between you and your adult kid to have a conversation about you having had them circumcised. Come on now. Use your noggin. Do you think I seriously meant to have a conversation with a days/weeks old infant that can't speak? haha
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:33 PM
-7

What? Huh? Where? You took that to a place I wasn't even thinking. I was speaking purely about circumcision. Are you trying to say circumcision is molestation? Because then we would have to say any medical procedure on children is molestation. I am not sure where you are headed, but I don't want to go there. Wow.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:27 PM
3

IDK. If I have any issue with the mutilation of some excess skin on my dick it is unconscious and I don't realize it. I have heard stories from women as well. I didn't mention any because I didn't want natural guys to feel bad. I thought circumcised men were a minority, but it is like 81%. 77% in 2010. Shocked.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:04 PM
-3

I don't even know why this is a big deal to anyone. get your kid circumcised or don't. That is between you and your kid. I am circumcised and glad I am. I couldn't imagine not being. But I also am not going to have a conversation with my parents thanking them. And I don't think they thought of my future sex life when they had it done.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 05:24 PM
1

So she is punishing male customers instead of the actual companies selling the products. And I bet she sells some of those products marked up to women in her shop. If she wanted to do it correctly she would sell the female products that are marked up at a 7% discount. Oh wait, but that would effect her bottom line. I hope men stop shopping here and they see a decline in revenue.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:40 PM
1

That's not how it works though. Maybe it should. IDK, but it doesn't. And usually news won't report the allegation until the guy is arrested. Except in high profile cases like Bill Cosby. And I am not saying his did/didn't do that. I was just pointing out the media did run multiple/hundreds of stories about him raping women before he was arrested.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:17 PM
-2

May be. But for most News orgs it is about time and money. They can easily tell a story of a rape occurring because they get a brief from police. But it takes more time and effort, which takes more money to tell the story of someone falsely accused. Plus, they believe they are doing a public service by reporting about rapes. They don't really see it as the same immediate public service from telling a falsely accused person story.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 04:34 PM
1

very true. Right on both points.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 11:36 PM
1

Luckily I have not seen this in my university at an admin level. However, The female students are a different story. It all comes down to whether they find you attractive or not. Hear me out. I have experienced this personally and have seen it concerning other students. You open a door for a female student. If she doesn't find you attractive she immediately says something like "I have a boyfriend." or runs over to friends "did you see that creepy guy?" It makes you feel like shit. Not because of…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 02:12 PM
2

exactly. That is why in the article one female student was quoted as having moved to a dorm closer to that lounge. BUt our "study" lounges also have TVs and Computers, etc. People aren't quiet in them. IDK why people don't study in their dorms if they need quiet and "safety." One girl took naps in the female only lounge it said? do they have beds? is it a designated sleeping place? That is no one's fault if she needs to find a new place to sleep. She should try her bedroom.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 10:04 PM
4

Actually, it was what she said. Those statistics are off too. No way 1 in 5 or 1 in 4 women is sexually assaulted. That would be nearly 3 million women a year are assaulted. That is insane numbers. That is over 8,000 assaults a day. Who cares about a study lounge? Apparently, by those numbers no one is studying they are all just assaulting people.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 09:11 PM
1

At my school, in the united states, each living facility has at least one or more study lounges. While the library can be a good half mile away. Most students here are lazy. Most women don't want to walk that distance alone in the dark. And our library only has one quiet floor. It is even farther from everything else. This is a small campus. On larger campuses the library could be over a mile away.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 09:06 PM
8

This hack writer is a fucking movie critic. His words, like his opinions, are idiotic. His entire world is based in fictional stories told on the screen. Ty Burr is an old nerd that hates real men because he could never become one.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:01 AM
10

Yeah, this "Me Too" kind of tantrum she threw has just made me not like her anymore. Kevin Spacey is the lead character. without him the show would be completely different. The show really wouldn't change that much without her. she plays a secondary character. She is an "okay" actor at best. Not a box office draw that demands top money.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 11:27 PM
2

I can attest to this. As a guy with a degree in advertising/PR I research every company I apply to. Thier "meet the team" page is almost always 80% female. I know being male has hurt me.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 01:01 AM
2

Emma Sulkowicz She graduated. From Columbia. So the grade was good enough. Which is a travesty. She has also financially benefited by having art shows, art "patrons" buying her work or subsidizing her. She has been in numerous publications/websites PR/Publicity has a monetary value. Obviously enough people are ideologically on her side. She has shown it is very rewarding ruining another person's life. So far. If he has a case and makes it in civil court maybe not.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:09 PM
1

Oh I'm sure. I wasn't saying I was correct. I think we all have some crazy in us. I personalize most everything. That's mine. People do things that affect me, I assume they don't like me even though they never thought of me. Especially if people make plans and don't follow through. So we all have something.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 06:26 AM
1

That's true. But some can hide it very well. Or it shows up here and there. I was with a woman for nearly a year before she started cutting herself. I was like wtf did I do to make you do this?she said she'd always been a cutter but it had been a year since she did it last. But i agree it is different if you're married for a while already. But to be honest, after what I've seen, at some point I now think every woman I date has some mental disorder.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 06:21 AM
5

A big part of the issue is when they began having medical doctors diagnosing and prescribing mental meds. But you're correct. People will look at how I spoke and think "Asshole." but like you said, facts are facts and you become a victim yourself becoming a personal caregiver. Giving up your life. That "til death do us part" and "in sickness and in health" is why I decided to never marry. Wait until someone was kissing on you, then 5 minutes later throwing shit at your head because a commercial …
/r/MensRights03/03/16 06:12 AM
8

Actually I think you got to the heart of a point nobody is saying. She seems to have some neurosis or is bipolar. Some mental condition and people have given her a platform to express herself unfiltered. So we get to witness her crazy. I've been in relationships with women that were neurotic bipolar and you literally can do nothing right. Everything is about them and how horrible their life is.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 06:03 AM
7

Why is this in The National Review? Seems in just several years all media companies have just gone to crap. She has gone full caricature. This term has never been sex specific. Now feminists are just appropriating things so they have something to complain about. They've run out of things to ban and have begun making stuff up.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 05:58 AM
3

It is cyclical. The Liberals were loud and effective fighting for rights back in the 60s. Pretty much the same rights being fought for. However, these liberal SJWs are the participation trophy generation that wasn't raised to fight with intelligence and peace. They just use herds to loudly shame people and deserve to get whatever they ask for just because they want it. It is parents like my brother and his wife. I love them, but I just want to slap them every time i go to their house and experie…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 06:03 AM
1

No, I understand how it works. But it does matter as in it goes to show her character that she would misuse an importantly horrible tragedy some women suffer to shame him into letting her out of a contract she signed. I can hear her now "let me out of this deal or I will say you assaulted me." now she claims she was coerced into saying he didn't drug and assault her ion the depositions. After watching them, there is no way she is lying. She would be the best actress ever. However, her mom does l…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:33 PM
2

well, when it comes to rape, I don't know that she has the power to determine if charges are filed does she? If there is sufficient evidence the police are obligated to arrest the guy despite what she says, right? So that would tell me there is no evidence, therefore couldn't be used to break a contract. What happened was, she was young and a nobody. She signed a shitty contract and now that she is a "star" she wants out of it.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 04:19 AM
21

I missed it.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 08:08 PM
37

exactly. I don't say this to be controversial but because it is true. And It is true because we can see it happening. Women, specifically feminists claim to be these strong, blah blah blah, but whenever it benefits them, they drag out the weak "he hurt me" stuff. I don't get how people can be so hypocritical and live with themselves.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:46 PM
180

But these are two separate cases. One is about a contract and another should be a criminal case of rape. as far as the contract litigation goes, the judge is right. Anyone of average intelligence would ask what her problem is. The record company and Dr. Luke told her she can go ahead and record music and tour, whatever. And she is crying? She signed a legal contract, now she wants out of it? Has anyone asked if she falsely accused the guy of this harassment in order to get out of a record contra…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:04 PM
1

Ugh. I'm not giving a dime to read an article when an ad is forced on me anyway.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:28 AM
8

New word Choreplainer: Jenny spent the night complaining until her partner did all the chores that "men are supposed to do."
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:51 PM
2

Again, those aren't my words. they are the industry words. And you can get upset. but they aren't. So why should we be offended by it? They know what the deal is and they get paid very well for not doing a whole lot. It is like people being outraged about football players and the concussion situation. Hey, those guys know the deal. They can not play football. But for many they get an education and some are compensated millions of dollars in return for the risks. No one needs us to be offended fo…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 04:48 PM
1

well, Variety is the spice of life. While I have to have some physical attraction there, I find intelligence and humor really attractive in women. So I find different women physically attractive if they have the other qualities.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 04:45 PM
2

Exactly. You are correct. But see average people do no research before coming up with this stuff. The irony is I my whole life I've never known a guy that can remember seeing a runway show, much less ever said women should look like those models. Yet women have begun to hold average men to the physical standards of fitness models, a tors and such. Only dating ripped guys. But that is okay to them.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:18 AM
3

Those nations passed those laws for the same reasons college presidents are quitting when cry babies say the rice on the sushi was under cooked in the caf and is disrespecting a culture. They are pandering to constituents.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 04:08 AM
1

OMG. They employ them because designers see them as just Hangers to show off the clothes. They don't employ them because they say "this is the ideal body type for women that every woman should strive for." That idea is just women putting words into people's mouths that were never said.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 04:05 AM
18

It is not meant to be sexy. Designers even say that runway models are just hangers to show off the clothes. That is what is funny. I have never heard one man say women that look like that are sexy. Women took it upon themselves to assume that and hate their own bodies.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 04:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter