| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningOk, good for you, now you don’t need to try to discuss | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 03:19 AM |
| 0 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningOk, and? There’s a world outside USA, you know? | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 03:18 AM |
| 0 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningI’m also against all, but the post is minimizing FGM by comparing it to circumcisions. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 03:17 AM |
| 0 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningNah man, I made my point. If you want to refute it by writing a thousand words, good for you, but I’m not reading it. Maybe you should reflect on how bad you’re in getting to people instead of blaming it on a law. For example, the post is bullshit and I didn’t use much energy to refute it, and many people that think that my opinion is bullshit didn’t write a kilometer long essay to prove me wrong, they didn’t use much energy too. If you don’t wanna elaborate in simpler words because you can only… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 02:25 AM |
| 0 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningI guess you don’t understand what an exaggerated comparison is lol. You think I was also literally comparing FGM to victims of shooting as if the majority of FGM ended in death? Come on man, use the braim | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 02:19 AM |
| 1 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningAnd I suggest you look infibulation, also don’t eat before. 10% of the FGM cases are these | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 12:58 AM |
| -4 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningI didn’t say men didn’t receive damage, learn to read, I said the damage is not comparable. You can’t compare a circumcision, taking the foreskin of the penis, with FGM, taking the clitoris or even the vulva | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 12:53 AM |
| -2 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningI didn’t say it didn’t count as genital tissue, but it isn’t as significant, not even close, to a clitoris. You showed one study, but there are also studies that show otherwise | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 12:46 AM |
| 1 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningIt’s not the same at all, taking the foreskin of the penis and taking partially or completely the clitoris. Women’s main source of pleasure is stimulating the clitoris, men’s source of stimulation is still there completely, the penis. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 12:35 AM |
| 1 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningLol I’m not reading this, would you care doing a summary. If not, no problem | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 12:29 AM |
| 1 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningOk, this is horrible, but this doesn’t happen 10x higher or 15x higher than FGM, it happens 10x lower or more than FGM. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 12:25 AM |
| -9 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningThat’s not my logic at all. I said you cannot compare it. I’m all for finishing with both, but that’s a shit comparison. This post isn’t about finishing circumcision, it’s about comparing circumcision with FGM, and they’re not comparable at all (talking about damage, they’re comparable only on both being without consent). By my logic, this comparison would be as dumb as saying “So much talk about victims of shootings but no talk about victims of slaps in the back even tho backslapping happens li… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/22 10:04 PM |
| -3 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningCome on, death is extremely unlikely as a result of a circumcision. You’re just completely under meaning FGM and over meaning MGM. You really just called most FGM “only small incisions on the clitoris” (which btw would be comparable to “only small incisions on the tip of the penis”) and MGM “removing nearly half of a baby’s penis”. If 10% of all the women affected by FGM land on FGM type III which involves infibulation then it’s not comparable at all. And FGM type I and II involves a partial or … | /r/MensRights | 19/02/22 07:59 PM |
| -11 | So much talk about FGM but no talk about MGM even tho MGM happens like 14 times more and will forever continue happeningI understand that more men are being harmed in this situation, without being able to control their own body, but you cannot compare removing the foreskin with actually mutilating the external female genitalia. Of course it is a problem, but it’s not like they are removing the tip of the penis | /r/MensRights | 19/02/22 06:45 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter