TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GodoftheChef Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by GodoftheChef on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Ok, good for you, now you don’t need to try to discuss
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:19 AM
0

Ok, and? There’s a world outside USA, you know?
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:18 AM
0

I’m also against all, but the post is minimizing FGM by comparing it to circumcisions.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 03:17 AM
0

Nah man, I made my point. If you want to refute it by writing a thousand words, good for you, but I’m not reading it. Maybe you should reflect on how bad you’re in getting to people instead of blaming it on a law. For example, the post is bullshit and I didn’t use much energy to refute it, and many people that think that my opinion is bullshit didn’t write a kilometer long essay to prove me wrong, they didn’t use much energy too. If you don’t wanna elaborate in simpler words because you can only…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:25 AM
0

I guess you don’t understand what an exaggerated comparison is lol. You think I was also literally comparing FGM to victims of shooting as if the majority of FGM ended in death? Come on man, use the braim
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:19 AM
1

And I suggest you look infibulation, also don’t eat before. 10% of the FGM cases are these
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:58 AM
-4

I didn’t say men didn’t receive damage, learn to read, I said the damage is not comparable. You can’t compare a circumcision, taking the foreskin of the penis, with FGM, taking the clitoris or even the vulva
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:53 AM
-2

I didn’t say it didn’t count as genital tissue, but it isn’t as significant, not even close, to a clitoris. You showed one study, but there are also studies that show otherwise
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:46 AM
1

It’s not the same at all, taking the foreskin of the penis and taking partially or completely the clitoris. Women’s main source of pleasure is stimulating the clitoris, men’s source of stimulation is still there completely, the penis.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:35 AM
1

Lol I’m not reading this, would you care doing a summary. If not, no problem
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:29 AM
1

Ok, this is horrible, but this doesn’t happen 10x higher or 15x higher than FGM, it happens 10x lower or more than FGM.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 12:25 AM
-9

That’s not my logic at all. I said you cannot compare it. I’m all for finishing with both, but that’s a shit comparison. This post isn’t about finishing circumcision, it’s about comparing circumcision with FGM, and they’re not comparable at all (talking about damage, they’re comparable only on both being without consent). By my logic, this comparison would be as dumb as saying “So much talk about victims of shootings but no talk about victims of slaps in the back even tho backslapping happens li…
/r/MensRights19/02/22 10:04 PM
-3

Come on, death is extremely unlikely as a result of a circumcision. You’re just completely under meaning FGM and over meaning MGM. You really just called most FGM “only small incisions on the clitoris” (which btw would be comparable to “only small incisions on the tip of the penis”) and MGM “removing nearly half of a baby’s penis”. If 10% of all the women affected by FGM land on FGM type III which involves infibulation then it’s not comparable at all. And FGM type I and II involves a partial or …
/r/MensRights19/02/22 07:59 PM
-11

I understand that more men are being harmed in this situation, without being able to control their own body, but you cannot compare removing the foreskin with actually mutilating the external female genitalia. Of course it is a problem, but it’s not like they are removing the tip of the penis
/r/MensRights19/02/22 06:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter