TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GodotIsWaiting4U Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by GodotIsWaiting4U on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Expiration plus five states declared they rescinded their ratification So there’s gonna be a whole legal battle over whether rescinding is actually possible
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:06 AM
7

Well also because it would eliminate female advantages in divorce court For one thing you either have to make men eligible for alimony or eliminate it
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:05 AM
10

That sub is basically TRP for women. I honestly don’t really care, if they want to sit around and be femcels then they’re choosing their future cats, whatever man. Better to let them circlequeef there than have them doing it all over better subs. Same reason I thought banning incels was a bad idea.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:54 PM
3

No, I really do think you should tell boys to man up — but you should also make it clear what you mean by that. “Man up” shouldn’t mean “never show any emotion ever”, and generally it doesn’t — but it does get treated like “don’t show emotions other people find inconvenient”. And that’s not the right approach. What “man up” should mean is “push yourself to be the kind of person other people can depend on in a crisis”. Because that’s extremely valuable. The most important things that you can be i…
/r/MensRights06/04/19 07:30 AM
3

He’s allowed to appeal a conviction, especially if he can argue it was a mistrial (might be able to argue a racial bias angle). He can get another chance with a new jury. And this seems like the sort of case where an appeal practically wins itself unless everyone has lost their damn minds.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 12:19 AM
1

They are in that you can’t be sentenced if the verdict is “not guilty”. The jury’s job is to decide if you did it, that’s all. They either say “guilty” “not guilty” or “we couldn’t reach a verdict”. They don’t get to recommend a sentence. The judge decides what the sentence will be. Now, the particular crimes that you get convicted of definitely influence the sentence — there are mandatory minimum sentences on the books for certain crimes, and the judge might decide that a particularly heinous c…
/r/MensRights06/04/19 12:16 AM
8

Start by not trusting any man who tells you not to trust men in general while implying he himself is a rare exception.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 12:41 AM
9

I would take an extreme malicious compliance approach and really lean into the “polemical questions” part, turn the presentation into a direct raging attack on the class and teacher for not being feminist enough about the absolute non-issue I select as the subject.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 12:41 PM
8

That’s actually the mainstream feminist position on the subject though, not some fringe delusion. Similar logic is applied to most scenarios that benefit women — it’s either misogyny in disguise or patriarchy backfiring. Whatever protects the narrative.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 03:10 PM
15

They’ve been gunning for him for years ever since he correctly predicted Trump’s win.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 02:59 PM
5

Worth noting that near the end of the article it says her defense attorney said she’s bipolar AND schizophrenic. Probably a strong mental illness element here too.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 06:28 PM
14

No, it’s a lot better. It’s the classic Blackstone formulation: that it’s better to let ten guilty go free than punish one innocent. Either way is an injustice, but punishing the innocent is cruel and tyrannical, while acquitting the guilty is merciful (perhaps too merciful). It’s better to be merciful than tyrannical. Also, not punishing the innocent is really important in order for punishment to work as a behavioral deterrent. If people believe that committing crimes will result in punishment …
/r/MensRights28/11/18 02:36 PM
4

You’re supposed to just roll over and die when you’re accused, you bigot! /s
/r/MensRights24/10/18 06:39 PM
3

Asia is Robespierre, and Mme. la Guillotine is calling her name.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:38 PM
17

I just always hold doors. I don’t really care about being thanked; I’m not doing it for them, I’m doing it for me, to just be courteous as a persistent automatic habit so I don’t have to think about it.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:38 PM
6

On the one hand, this was rape, not attempted rape, so that sounds like a pass. On the other hand, the fact that even this much happened is better than usual, so I guess it's progress.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/15 03:21 AM
5

It's the same logic by which attempted murder is not as serious as actual murder. If you are inept enough that it failed, you are not as dangerous as a successful criminal. The corrections system has several goals in dealing with convicts: 1) Rehabilitation, where possible. It's better for everyone if a criminal changes their ways and becomes a productive member of society. 2) Containment. Violent criminals are dangerous people, and need to be isolated from the rest of us for the sake of public …
/r/PussyPass19/05/15 01:31 AM
13

My guess? Excessive bail.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/15 01:01 PM
19

No, the US is supposed to use "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" for all criminal cases. A slick enough lawyer can get a jury to forget that, and juries are often in a rush to convict if the accusation is rape, but it is SUPPOSED to be innocent until proven guilty.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/15 01:00 PM
1

Oh. I must have missed that bit. Well -- GOOD.
/r/PussyPass07/04/15 10:55 PM
37

She's out on bail for now. At her trial date -- if she makes it -- I hope she's going to spout the most retarded entitled rich girl shit right there on the stand and earn a strong guilty verdict.
/r/PussyPass04/04/15 06:07 AM
4

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought." -- Princess Leia Organa
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/15 01:08 AM
0

Regarding the fundraising etc: "out damned spot" didn't do much for Lady Macbeth either.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/15 06:41 PM
1

"She should" here meaning "she is likely to", not "it would be better if she did".
/r/PussyPass23/02/15 11:56 PM
1

I remember seeing something on TiA a short while back where someone wrote an article saying paternity tests are misogynistic because women should have the power to designate whoever they damn well please as the father and make him raise the kid. Found it!
/r/PussyPass23/02/15 07:41 PM
1

Jezebel: advocating for women by reminding everybody that domestic violence is wacky fun!
/r/PussyPass23/02/15 07:38 PM
1

If it's a jury trial, the jury can decide to render whatever verdict they want to regardless of where the evidence points and everyone else just has to deal with it. That's jury nullification. Usually the way this is avoided is by just neglecting to mention that to the jurors so they don't realize they have that power, since they are SUPPOSED to deliberate fairly, but they can do whatever they feel like while they're deliberating and come to a conclusion however they want and only the other juro…
/r/PussyPass23/02/15 07:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter