TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Godskook Archive

View 0 posts and 209 comments by Godskook on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You go to therapy to fix something. Just like you go to a mechanic to fix something. You don't go to a mechanic that's really only good at fixing flats to get engine work done. You don't go to a mechanic that's really only good at engine work to get detailing. You need the right mechanic for the right problem. Someone who knows how to fix what needs fixing. Go listen to some Jordan Peterson videos, maybe some HeatlhyGamerGG, see if they resonate with you better. If so, you might not have found t…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:39 AM
3

I'm not saying they were correct, I'm saying it happened.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 10:44 AM
-4

I remember a lot of male spaces over my childhood being intentionally torn down, culturally, because they allegedly propagated misogyny, so yes.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 04:25 PM
1

Might want to brush up on things.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 08:50 AM
1

I mean..."what is what" gets very muddled in this conversation to the point where honestly, its equally inaccurate to say its the egg that's the "actual living cell that grows". The egg does not grow. The sperm does not grow. The thing that is the combination of both, grows. The gestalt.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 08:15 AM
1

If you make up your own definitions, you're not even wrong in this kind of conversation. Its the same problem Feminists have with the word racism. They redefined it until its essentially unfalsifiable. Neither sperm nor eggs have consciousness by the usual definitions. Otoh, consciousness does not require the ability to move. A grown adult can retain their consciousness just fine while under full-body paralysis.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 07:41 AM
3

For a sperm to be able to fertilize an egg, that egg must be equally "alive", same as the sperm. Its just that eggs are less mobile than sperm, that's all.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 06:43 AM
2

The idea that this "men" make "women" do all the labor in America is laughable on so many levels that I just can't even figure out which part to begin with. Let's start that it entirely undermines the at least slightly more accurate feminist position that men are patriarchal bread-winners who want women to just stay home and have babies, instead of joining the workforce. These are mutually exclusive perspectives of "men". Can't have both.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 10:07 AM
5

What's bad tactics is to play the game the Feminists want you to play. They WANT you to abandon words. That's how they play. They take away the words, and now you can't talk. Giving up your words is retreat. And you can't win by just retreating. Its bad strategy if you want to win.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 07:43 AM
-2

That is called a Motte-and-bailey fallacy No, its not. You're the only one that believes there's a Motte. "Everyone else" is arguing about if the Bailey is mysogynistic or not. In otherwords, I accused you, already, of setting up a strawman. I'm not "changing positions because I was attacked". I only ever had the one position. To be clear, the words I used to define Manosphere are cut & paste from Wikipedia. Also see previous point. I know, and to be clear, I think the wiki's definition is stupi…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 06:44 AM
-16

"Convincing Striped Falafel" is not a requirement for something being true. And the first issue is that the manosphere that does exist, that does get pointed at by feminists, and does talk about itself as the manosphere? Doesn't fit your definition. You might as well said "North America doesn't exist anymore. My definition for North America is 'A continent that existed in 1799.' Prove to me, by my definition, that North America still exists." It ends up being the same discussion. You hide behind…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 05:36 AM
10

Women objectify men differently than men objectify women. Men objectify women by reducing them to sex objects. Women don't do this to men in general. They sometimes do it to high-status men like Ryan Reynolds or w/e, but it won't be most mens' experience. What's more common is women who objectify men into beasts of burden. A thing to produce the bounty of labor that she might enjoy it. Sometimes, it'll be by reducing a man down to a wallet(sugardaddy!), and sometimes it'll be by making him respo…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 07:16 PM
-1

As described by feminists, Patriarchy is generally a quite naive take on how societies functioned. Most notably because it ignores "soft power" in the analysis entirely. It also ignores the agency of those in lesser classes. You see that latter point more in how they talk about rape, assuming that the more powerful person(if male) is the only one capable of consent, which is just ludicrous.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 02:42 AM
1

"So if a misogynist made sure his views only annoyed women, that'd be ok?"
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:34 AM
0

Sir, asking this question is weak. Winston Churchill was short. Mahtma Ghandi was short. George Lucas was short. If you want to be a great leader, you NEED to be someone who's height as a flaw is not a dominant part of peoples' impression of you. Its a you thing. You can control this. Some shallow people might never see you as anything else, but great leaders don't really want to lead shallow people. They will if its useful, but a great leader isn't going to give a shit when they can't. They're …
/r/MensRights04/03/25 02:46 PM
1

Some of it is just the ease with which one can acquire a romantic partner. If a woman didn't want to be single, changing that is likely just as simple as finding a guy who is single.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 07:57 PM
3

What crazy head-in-sand woman thinks that there's single thing that's "always a man"? Even if you define rape as requiring penetration of a vagina, women have still done it. (And that's more narrow than the legal definitions I've seen. That wouldn't cover a woman raping a woman in the ass. Or a woman raping a man in the ass. And then there's all the transexual versions of the crime where we've somehow gotten a "woman with a phallus" as the perpetrator. Which means trans-inclusive feminists have …
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:35 AM
2

Because the vast majority of slurs used by...literally anyone are whatever options look like they'd be insulting to the target. Being realistic is secondary. Nobody cares about making a cogent argument. That's why they're hurling insults, anyway. Insults are not cogent arguments. Which is why the N-word is such an evergreen slur. Everyone knows that it WILL be insulting. So the part of everyone's brain that understands human behavior but not racism has it prepped. (See every democrat that calls …
/r/MensRights14/10/24 08:50 PM
2

Primarily? Logistics. The costs required for this "experiment" are rather prohibitive.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 05:11 AM
3

One of the major reasons decent men are single is because they don't make good first impressions with women. This is largely a consequence of womens' unrealistically high standards which came from various changes in society since the 1960s. Such as birth control allowing women to have lower-risk sex with men outside their LTR-range, and then becoming "stuck on their highest setting", expecting men in their LTR-range to measure up to those unreasonable standards. I've seen women who genuinely did…
/r/MensRights24/03/24 12:56 AM
4

The dumb part is that, outside actual misbehavior neither implied or stated by her, there's everything right about pursuing sexual interests through one's friendships. Guys are more likely to pursue long-term relationships with women they know they're already friends with.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 09:25 AM
6

Join a D&D group or 5. Or a mtg "pod" or w/e. Anything that meets *in person* built by nerds/geeks. And then try to be a bit cooperative. If its D&D, build your character for teamwork. If its MtG, try to avoid winning "too much"(retire any deck that they can't seem to beat, and do **NOT** play Stax).
/r/MensRights23/03/24 09:22 AM
3

First, by sheer definition, there’s something wrong with it. That’s the whole point of the term by those who’d choose to self-apply it. But it’s not a slur/insult, just a diagnostic term, like “blind” or “lame”. Second, most modern uses of the word “incel” are by assholes using it as a slur to slander people who aren’t actually incels, blackpillers, or anything of the sort, just vaguely right-wing. You’re mostly talking about this crowd, and yeah, you’re right, we can just fully ignore them. Thi…
/r/MensRights14/03/24 02:54 PM
2

Ben Shapiro is not a socialist. This is a quote of him opposing a socialist policy that’s generally unpopular among conservatives. I’m SHOCKED. C’mon man, at least find a quote that isn’t “opposing flagrant left wing thing” if you want to prove a point other than him being non-left.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 07:49 AM
1

What kind of pleasure will I be achieving by going to the gym regularly? Plus the "pain" (of first developing the body and then maintaining it) would still exist right? 1.Higher general energy. 2.Social benefits from various people who judge you on your body. Including women. 3.Generally speaking, "going to the gym" is not something that registers in the brain as "painful" for those who do it regularly. There's a reason there's gym-bros who actually enjoy it. 4.Health benefits depending on where…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/23 04:45 PM
1

Ultimately, all the pleasures and accomplishments you seek come with a cost: 1 unit of pleasure comes with 4 units of pain. Sure, but that's not the conversion works, and it snowballs. You've over-localized your thinking to care only about the here and now, and that's a thought-pattern that usually ends up with less pleasure over time. So the question is really this: Do you want to do things like lifting, and spend a bit of "pain" upfront to harvest far more pleasure than you invested? Cause if …
/r/TheRedPill30/11/23 03:13 PM
7

Norah Vincent was better in no small part because she fully tried to grasp the male perspective before letting her pre-concieved notions analyze it. You can see it in a contrast of how the two women approached "passing". Norah placed a lot more emphasis on being indistinguishable from "normal" men. This author places more emphasis on becoming the sort of man they imagined they'd be before their transition. Taking up more space than women would deem appropriate would be a success for Norah, but n…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 03:14 PM
17

Eh, I'm more bothered by the "When I became a man, society dropped all these shitty constraints on me. Society is fine. Men, let me explain how you as individuals can work on yourselves to cope with this. Step 1, be better women."
/r/MensRights08/08/23 03:06 PM
1

Depends on if it’s just inspiration or if she’s treating you as an elaborate sex doll. I don’t give a shit where my SO might accidentally draw inspiration from if that inspiration immediately brings her to desiring me. And even in the sex doll scenario, I’m mostly worried because of what that might mean for her fidelity in our relationship. If I could be confident that it wasn’t going to spiral into negative real world consequences, I have no desire to police a woman’s internal thoughts. But rea…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:29 PM
-1

They aren't "constantly" shamed about it, depending on the social circles.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:11 PM
3

When exactly do women become adults and thus accountable for their own actions? Like...I get it when its a guy who's actively abusing his power with threats or as a career-bottleneck, but afaik, DiCaprio is just someone who's dating girls. That's it, that's what he's guilty of. But the girls involved don't "count" as adults, I guess.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 07:49 AM
-4

I don’t care what she’s actually like. She’s shit no matter what That makes you a bigot by the objective definition. Oh, you’re a commie troll. Makes sense now He ain't trolling, and I ain't left-wing. What's your problem, buddy?
/r/MensRights17/01/23 05:29 AM
22

Why do people hate on Men who can't get laid. I don't get it. They mostly don't. THEY hate one people who disagree with them and use whatever convenient slur is available. And by "they" I mean most people who use slurs. Buttloads of claims of "sexism" or "racism" are just some asshat who grabbed a "socially unacceptable" slur(or twenty).
/r/MensRights06/01/23 02:04 PM
5

I don't have daughters(yet), but if/when I do, I'm going to teach them what's essentially the same as what my Mother and Sisters believe, which is that Feminism is stupid in all it's forms. Also, unlike most(?) feminists, my daughters will understand that men and women can only ever be "as equal" as basic RPG classes, LoL champion groupings, or other similarly analogous metaphor. Which will make them quite comfortable with biological equivalents to "Ashe is a crappy tank" or "fighters should be …
/r/MensRights21/11/22 11:09 PM
1

The moment the power-politics tribal people started having gendered opinions. When everything is about zero-sum power-dynamics between tribal groups, "tribe women" will **ALWAYS** view men's problems as a threat. (Not all women are part of "tribe women", nor is that tribe composed of just women)
/r/MensRights17/11/22 05:39 PM
2

He said logical reason.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:30 PM
1

The implication being that I was ever not-sick of it? No, I think this one was sickening from the word go.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:07 PM
1

There's a set of reasons to cancel a date where the woman asking for compensation for her wasted effort to get ready for it makes sense, and there's amounts that are reasonable. What those are, idk, but I can't imagine they're $3k.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:53 PM
2

The problem is, you can't "debunk" the logic individually on these(at least the ones I checked). You have to catch the difference in standards for how they treat information that's essentially identical and prove the hypocrisy. The prison statistics one is "easy" cause the hypocrisy is self-contained to the same argument. They're making a valid argument about why there's a disproportionate amount of men in prison(although maybe that proportion isn't where it should be), but they wouldn't accept …
/r/MensRights08/08/22 11:39 AM
5

Found the feminist. Nah, the behavior isn't reasonably rational, and thus, it's perfectly reasonable to be baffled that someone actually does it anyway.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 05:32 AM
0

People: "Ma reine, les hommes n'avent pas l'egalité." I don't speak french. Is this a common statement or something? Is it something the murderous bastards of the French Revolution said? I'm confused. Feminist queens: "Qu'ils mangeant de la brioche." My understanding is that Marie Antionette never said this, and has in fact said things quite more noble.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 08:55 PM
-4

#2 is the "standard" meaning of a queen, and they're not "pampered", they have a great deal of expectations placed upon them. Especially because they're often expected to be capable of maintain the stability of the kingdom in the absence of their husband, either while he is away or sometimes after his death if the crown prince is not of age to take the throne. A Queen Consort of any worth would not look favorably on these petty insurrectionists.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 07:53 PM
0

The best part is that the reversal statement is just as accurate.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 07:22 PM
76

other queens There are two sorts of queens: 1.Those who rule, like Queen Elizabeth, and value the men underneath them(it's why they're still alive, rulers who don't value their underlings don't live long). 2.Those who are in service to their King. Anyone else calling themselves a "queen" is at best a petty tyrant waiting for their comeuppance and at worst a peasant with delusions of grandeur. These women are NOT "queens".
/r/MensRights01/08/22 05:16 PM
-8

It's a bad progression of logic. First, wanting an unreasonable amount of sex IS selfish. It puts too much focus on getting the dude's rocks off and not enough on other things, like relationship, career, or social life. Second, one of the previously unlisted criteria is rooted in the woman. Her feelings, health and such. The problem comes in her assuming that what feels like "a reasonable amount of sex" to her is a reasonable amount of sex, when it's NOT. In reality, women are supposed to put ef…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:56 PM
2

Entitlement? I’m guessing you’re referring to women wanting the same opportunities as most men, especially white men Nope. Don't be a clown by shoving your talking points into my mouth.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 01:53 AM
1

Just unpack the definition. Patronizing and condescending are perfectly functional words already, and there was absolutely no reason whatsoever to pretend like mansplaining was defining anything new, unique, or gender-specific.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:56 PM
7

I've always seen nagging and bitching as two completely different behaviors. Nagging is when someone(typically a woman because gender variance and the modern entitlement ideals many women get taught, my mom did not nag my Dad all that much, despite being a very aggressive woman).....basically pesters someone else to do something that the nagging person wants to have happen. Either in terms of one request made frequently or in many requests. The inverse problem is when the other person simply isn…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:53 PM
14

Hypergamy isn't a purely female phenomenon. Slutiness(or oat-sowing, or w/e we want to call it) isn't a purely male one. You can easily observe some women who spin plates like they're reading TRP. You can find dudes who monkeybranch. These are unlikely scenarios, but they do happen. Hell, my first observed cases of monkeybranching were of successful men trading out their same-age pre-wealth wives for hot young wives they could now attract during the peak of their successful careers. Honestly, mo…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/22 11:12 PM
1

Same with the word "slut". Then word sluts should not be a slur. Actually, I'd bet money that slut started as a slur.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 10:56 AM
-3

Well, more or less, except that they develop are not inaccurate, they are at most incomplete. That is not to say some aren't inaccurate, with enough members some are bound to be, but by and large they have extremely accurate understanding of women. It's just that it's not very pleasant or PC, but that is not the same as it is inaccurate. If you have an idea of all women that only describes <10% of them(which is true of Incels/Blackpills in particular), then it's fair to describe it as inaccurate…
/r/MensRights17/04/22 08:37 AM
-3

Its actually the original meaning of the word, people who where unable to attract mates because of factors they themselves where unable to change. It's just that feminists could not allow men to be seen as victims in any way so they immediately set out to stigmatize the word and falsely associate it with entitled people who demands any and all women fuck them non matter what. It originally was developed by a woman, to describe herself. Also, my understanding of the history is that the "Incels"(p…
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:34 AM
-2

Why is it worth making fun of people who don't believe that there is hope for themselves? Brah. I never said or implied anything of the sort.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:27 AM
-1

Its not. As women choose to be sluts. Incel is on sex, race, disability, age discrimination level as its genetic The number of genetically condemned incels is exceedingly small compared to the number of self-identified incels. What's more, nobody is talking about those few poor souls when the word "incel" is used in practice. Those who use it as an insult are very explicitly intending to indicate that the insulted is of a similar disposition to a black-piller.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 02:43 AM
5

Why are you focused on getting specifically married though? Is there some kind of benefit you are looking for from the legal marriage agreement? The opposite, he never said anything of the sort.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:47 AM
7

What is the obsession y’all have on here with wanting to be deadbeat fathers. If you have children the absolute bare minimum you can do is financially support them like Jesus Christ Dude's trying to find a way to keep a family he hasn't had yet together, and you're calling him a deadbeat dad? Geezus man, get some reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:45 AM
16

Dude...you don't have a right to not support a family you create. This is so ass-backwards of a hot-take I'm surprised you can make it. Guy's looking to protect himself from a woman who'll try to take his family away from him, not "avoid supporting his family". How you can read that and think this is beyond me.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:44 AM
3

I included it as part of my quote because the person I quoted used it in their argument. Here, copy-pasted it into a thing so you can see where we're talking about. I can draw you arrows and highlight the exact post in which you said it, but if this doesn't get it across to you, I can't understand it for you. You said it first, before he quoted you having said it, and before you quoted him.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 10:42 PM
3

I don’t know why you’re so hung up on me quoting someone saying “in this thread” You're the one who initially said it.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 10:25 PM
3

The person I’m replying to said I was stating I was the victim of sexism by people in this thread That is false What you quoted was me stating someone else was being sexist. The person I’m replying to clearly stated in their comment You said they were in the same place, "in this thread", in both quotes. You don't get to change the definition of words just because he called you out on it. It's the exact same "in this thread" wording in all three places(your two quotes and his in-between reply). E…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 08:41 PM
3

You’re again making things up. I never said people were being sexist to me in this thread. Feel free to find any quote proving otherwise I don't particularly care for /u/NoTrueScotswoman69's appropriately but unrestrained angry response to your lies, but.....you very clearly said this: I’ve already had a conversation with another person in this thread who believed all women were sexist because he had individually had a bad experience with women. I literally only had to scroll upwards to find it.…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:53 PM
2

The person I was reply to in the above comment was not stopping at feminism. I already said this, I can’t tell you any other way His comment absolutely did stop at feminism. This is fundamental to how pronouns work. OP was strictly referring to feminism(not women), and the guy you responded to was a top-level post that used "they". That pronoun, in that context, can only be referring to "feminists", rather than anything else. What kind of specification is “this one” going to give me? Ok....so yo…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:55 PM
2

The issue is people aren’t stopping at feminists. The issue is that you responded to people who are stopping at feminist and you treated them with prejudice. That's bigotry on your part. What's worse is that you're defending your naked prejudice. I stated a fact that I believe most mens rights groups are an echo chamber for sexism "a fact that I believe X" is a a belief, and in this case, a particularly prejudiced one. And are you really trying to say me stating that radical feminists are not re…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:31 PM
2

I am testing your knowledge of leftism. Your clearly are limited. Less limited than you, by all accounts you've demonstrated. But again, feel free to make a coherent point such that you can attempt to prove me wrong, rather than the weak-sauce posturing you've been doing.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 01:25 PM
3

Who were the biggest enemies of the Bolsheviks on the western front in 1921? Bruh, you've done two posts of complete dead fish, and now you're asking history questions? You've lost all "good faith" tolerance here. Make your point or bow out.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 08:20 AM
2

Her argument likely comes from a very conservative view of mariage.......as in women stay home, have kids, and take care of the home and husband's needs. To achieve this, women are expected to sacrifice any career prospects they have. A woman in a very conservative marriage either: A)Has a load of free time with which to pursue her career interests casually. B)A great deal of sweat equity invested in amplifying her husband's career prospects. C)Didn't have a lot to sacrifice D)A buttload of kids…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 05:27 AM
7

Do you actually think feminists believe this? This kind of stupidity only comes from the <1% of extremists, it’s not a representation of all women or even all feminists so please don’t make it out to be such. It’s only perpetuating more sexism Do you realize how weird it is for you to mention "representation of [all] women" here? You're inserting that where it's not being used in this conversation, and it serves literally no purpose. A commentary on feminism as an ideology does not reflect on wo…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 05:03 AM
2

You just proved my point. You don't have a point, you have a baseless claim. Feel free to say more than a glorified "nuh uh" in response to the things I've said, such that you can be more than "not even wrong".
/r/MensRights07/04/22 11:22 PM
0

You don't understand the left. "the left" and "leftism" are not the same thing. "the left" includes actual liberals, and not just the socialists/marxists/feminists.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:05 PM
12

Feminism is not leftism. There's a whole lot of overlap and hand-holding. If you take out one, you're basically left without anything of note within the other.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 03:00 PM
23

That’s the weirdest part about it. Why exactly would they want all men to feel the pain of pregnancy? Sounds a bit.. sinister. And fucked up. Some of them think empathy is fundamentally tied to experience and/or the threat of experience. And since a man has no natural threat of experiencinc labor, an artificial one is what they likely think is needed. Which, to be fair, is absolutely true of some people, although that list contains fewer men and more women than a person like this would care to a…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:19 AM
5

Really interesting watch, if you haven't seen it before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip7kP\_dd6LU
/r/MensRights04/04/22 06:44 AM
2

W take What's that?
/r/MensRights02/04/22 07:42 PM
1

Hot take? Sex-based segregation has never been “sexist”. It might, in some cases, be motivated by sexism, but in many cases, such as gyms, bathrooms, and the like, it’s motivated the fundamental fact that men and women aren‘t equivalent, and not only do they have different needs, interactions between them is actually complicated. Especially in settings that require a greater degree of self-exposure than is the norm.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 03:05 PM
6

Liar Liar had the best advice for women like this: STOP BREAKING THE LAW, ASSHOLE!
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:03 AM
1

Okay, well I'm sorry that you didn't understand that it was self-explanatory. That's not accurate. I understood that it wasn't self-explanatory.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 04:06 PM
1

I mean, it seemed self-explanatory so.... It wasn't, not from what you said. Although I totally understand why you would feel that way.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 04:03 PM
24

Another fun fact, it's a woman who made up the term "incel," not dudes. Uh, the important bit you didn't say is that she made it up to describe women(herself, really).
/r/MensRights05/03/22 04:30 AM
0

Aren't you a nasty, arrogant piece of work. Calling you out when you do something wrong doesn't make me nasty or arrogant. Especially when the thing you did wrong is "standard shitty feminist tactics". But hey, keep using their playbook, see how far it gets you.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 03:52 AM
-1

Stop relying on legal prescription. Outside legal prescription it would be dumb to charge someone with a sex-crime for an action that had absolutely nothing to do with sex, both in terms of intent, action and reasonable reception. When I was raped as a seven and eight year old it was legal because a woman did it. The absence of any relevant statute does not mean I wasn't sexually assaulted. Please don't pull that feminist crap where you bring up something tragic and irrelevant to play the victim…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 08:37 AM
1

Well, you’re also wrong. Ball kicking can be a sexual act and it’s called « ball busting ». Read the conversation man. I'm clearly drawing a distinction between incidents with a sexual component and those that have none whatsoever, but still involve touching relevant areas.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 08:30 AM
1

Try saying that in a feminist or women's groups. You're gonna get DW, mark my words. What does that have to do about the price of tea in china?
/r/MensRights28/02/22 04:23 AM
-2

You're completely wrong, with regards to federal rules on the subject. The term “sexual assault” means any nonconsensual sexual act proscribed by Federal, tribal, or State law, including when the victim lacks capacity to consent. https://www.justice.gov/ovw/sexual-assault
/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:30 AM
7

Afaik, sexual assault necessitates a sexual component. In absent of one, you're just talking about regular assault/battery.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 01:58 AM
3

Could you name some examples? Given that it's all about drawing compare/contrasts between similars, not really.....I'd need to be talking to her myself.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 05:57 AM
5

She's probably operating on a double standard of proof towards who has which level of agency, and in most conversational cases, there's no salvaging this, as you'd need to dig too deep into her fundamental assumptions, and then demonstrate that one of them is unfounded, which is arduous and usually treated as offensive as a process, by the vast majority of humans. If you're lucky enough to be dealing with an edge case, try to work through examples of standards she thinks are set by men and stand…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 03:12 AM
7

Lol. The post is suggesting it wasn't slut shaming but you're just leaning right in with a pro-slut shaming stance eh? You get that women are far more vulnerable to STDs and that contracting an STD goes up with partner-count, right? For a woman who wants to go back to long-term relationships, it's absolutely a bad idea, medically, to sleep around, let alone the mental health issues associated with sleeping around.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:57 PM
36

While you could argue that the stronger gender roles of the 1800s were not desirable, that does not lead to the conclusion that feminism was in any way a solution to that problem, let alone a needed solution. Undesirable configurations aren't always things that NEED to be changed, relative to the vast list of other things that can be changed, as there's always a very very long list of desired improvements to the world. Gender roles had downsides for women in the 1800s, as a "gender class". They …
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:37 AM
12

The third one is kind of ironic because she implies that a very large audience doesn't understand her, so therefore she is probably the one who is spewing nonsense. Less ironic and more just stupid once you notice he didn't describe anything related to the word "gross" and instead say "because we still have the patriarchy".
/r/MensRights30/11/21 04:47 AM
1

Honestly, she'd have a point if her tweet was all there was to it. Which it wasn't, like every other thing people like this get mad about.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 01:38 AM
5

Calling people names meant to minimize isnt being blunt. Its being rude. He called you a "nice" guy, not a "nice guy". As in a guy who's actually nice. Also as in not a "name", but a description. And also not in a way that's meant to minimize.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 06:16 PM
1

Half the shit you addressed is "wrong" because it just doesn't fucking matter. You can be ugly as sin and weak as shit, and still pick up girls if you've got your attitude sorted. As has been said many a time before, "he who thinks he can and he who thinks he can't are both probably right".
/r/TheRedPill29/10/21 06:24 PM
1

Why wouldn't the feminists want to have equal treatment amongst men and women where the draft is concerned? I thought they wanted equality? This is a conservative group, so.....mostly/completely not feminist. If you look at the website, you see a lot of stuff in that vein. https://concernedwomen.org/
/r/MensRights19/10/21 10:07 PM
0

Offering people rides home is "creepy"? What weird world is this woman living in? Like....maybe she's failing describe these particular guys as threatening as they actually were, but there's no world where "you need a ride home?(after our wonderful date)" is creepy.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:05 PM
1

Your children will believe what your baby-momma believes. Don't date a woman you don't want teaching your kids.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 06:37 AM
1

I have. A lot. Usually related to the reasons for why I'm not normal. Men, women, it really didn't matter so much on that front.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 08:29 PM
1

So I checked your history, cause I was curious, and apparently your argument strategy with everyone is to just berate them as if you're god's gift to conversation, rather than attempt to make an argument. If I hadn't already known all your insults were based on your own insecurities, that would've confirmed it. Reasonable people don't call people "failed abortions". I'm done here, so don't expect another reply to your drivel, but feel free to post it so I can get one more laugh at the expense of…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:28 PM
1

Wow, you are clearly a racist if you think a white cop convicted of murdering a black man by cutting off his blood supply to his head for 3 minutes after he became unresponsive is a good cop. Trying to equivocate by claiming you “reviewed the evidence” is a pathetic hedge against your clear racism. "agree with me or you're a racist!" Dude, I already saw through your transparent attempts at vapid insults. There really was no point coming back for round 2. Adding more baseless insults doesn't make…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 06:46 PM
2

Where is the proof the Kavanaugh was falsely accused? It's part of the presumption of innocence as a principle. There's no real evidence against him. Therefore he's innocent, and therefore he was falsely accused. If you'd care to accept the burden of providing evidence to his guilt, go right ahead, but otherwise get out of here with that silly idea that I need to somehow prove the innocence of an innocent man. And what a way to back up your point by defending a convicted murder against charges o…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 06:50 AM
9

Well said! I don’t have moneys for an award so take this beer instead: 🍺 I'd rather have the compliment than the "award"! Thanks!
/r/MensRights13/09/21 11:57 PM
47

Not only that but apparently it's lost on them that being accused of something does not make a person automatically guilty. While also, in these cases, ignoring the harm false accusations do to men who did not commit any of the accused crimes. Kavanaugh will forever be tainted by those false allegations, far worse than if they had forced him to wear a scarlet cloth letter A on his clothes at all time. And it's not that this is actually lost on them. They're perfectly capable of leveraging all th…
/r/MensRights13/09/21 06:55 PM
1

That's a lovely story however its one case in a million, and that's why it's in the news. Anything that is in the news is very unusual. You get that the unusual part of that story was that he wasn't just -some- midget, but rather a person worth writing articles about, such that they were looking for puff pieces on him. Y'know, someone who spent a lot of time on self-improvement. Also, it's the Wales local news, so it's not like it's a particularly difficult achievement to be the most interesting…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 03:10 PM
1

So you're not really objecting to anything I said, as much as you're objecting to what you think will be the first-generation interpretation of what I said by some people? If so, I get why you did it, and there's nothing more me to address on that tangent.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 01:20 PM
1

You haven't said anything I disagree with, nor anything I didn't know before, except the part where you said you disagreed with me. Which has me confused as to why you're objecting to my explanation. I'm not defaming the standard MGTOW group, nor associating them with black-pill. Hell, it's an explicit part of what I said that baseline MGTOW hold beliefs that are contradictory to black-pill.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 06:53 AM
1

Yes, you can become a billionaries. You can fix almost anything about you. But you cannot fix height. Again, "that one physical flaw" is not an incel-sentence. If it was, I couldn't point to people in happy relationships who have that flaw. The easy example here is Peter Dinklage, but he's not even close to the only midget married to a non-midget. Or as another example, this guy: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-40184777 So yes, there are things you can't fix, but if you can't find a single wom…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 01:20 AM
0

Quasimodo was great. He was kind, generous, caring... so, based on your comments here, you seem to believe that women would be lining up for him. I actually don't. He had basically every hallmark of the "nice guy"(not the one feminists go on about, the one Karen Straughn would talk about). Admittedly a lot of it was imposed upon him by Claude Frollo, but he still had a host of behavioral issues that needed to be addressed. A lot of "self-improvement" or "socially recognized competence" as I've m…
/r/MensRights22/08/21 09:32 PM
1

This just isn't true. A lot of men can find anyone including me. And I'm tired of being told my situation doesn't exist Oh, I'm not saying your situation doesn't exist, I'm saying you can fix it yourself, by figuring out what it is you can improve about yourself, and fix those things. (I assume you meant "can't")
/r/MensRights22/08/21 08:56 PM
1

Of course they wouldn't be "lining up", but that's a goal-post shift of what I claimed. A rather hyperbolic one at that.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 08:54 PM
0

Huh? Quasimodo had none of those things I listed. I was using those to differentiate Quasimodo from Hawking. And you'll note, again, that I said "looks like Quasimodo", not "is Quasimodo".
/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:28 PM
-1

How does that align with your view that women don't prioritize looks? Read what I wrote, don't just come at me with your prejudices. I didn't say "women don't prioritize looks", I said something far more akin to "women don't have looks as their highest priority, and the others can just overwhelm it pretty easily". And the specific one relevant for incels is "self-improvement"(which does tend to get you money)
/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:28 PM
-2

Its not repeating your point, is ironizing You didn't add any irony, though. he was a big gold pot for gold diggers, rich and teminally ill Neither of Hawking's wives have the backstories that would suggest "gold digger", so try again, unless you've got very strong evidence to suggest contrary to what's generally known.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:38 PM
0

Do you really believe that's true? I don't, especially not in today's society. It's replicated constantly. Women really do not seem to prioritize looks over socially-recognized competence. I'm a pretty ugly dude, but I'm tall, and my dating life was rough for years. Eventually, I found my wife (or, rather, she found me) and it all worked out. However, even my wife admits she wouldn't have pursued me if I had been short. Ok, so you're anecdotal evidence to my position. Cool. Especially because yo…
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:15 PM
-2

Yup. Why are you just repeating my point?
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:01 PM
0

A lifetime of rejections will do that to you. It has nothing to do with convincing yourself when you have receipts. Yes, it still does, despite the receipts. The logic they're arguing against is saying "you haven't improved enough yet", and those receipts don't disprove the premise that self-improvement lays out. It's like the question "how do I become physically fit", and you get the answer "go to the gym". If one goes for a week, then quits, because "it isn't working", one has convinced one's …
/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:00 PM
0

The thing is, you could look like Quasimodo and some women will still date you. Stephen Hawkings had multiple wives. The idea that physical deformity is some sort of incel-sentence is a lie so laughable I can't even describe it. The PUAs have this one right. If you're well-focused on self-improvement and actually achieve that, women will find you attractive no matter what.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 08:13 AM
25

How is men’s rights related to “pick up artistry” in any way? What a joke Lots of the same people, lots of the same baseline ideological differences compared to mainline culture. Otoh, it's a lot like calling Dave Rubin's followers being "related" to Milo Yianopolous' followers, so....kind of a weak link, same with all of this except the black-pill/incel one, where it's even worse, as black-pills are an opposition ideology to a lot of things held true by one or more of the other groups on that l…
/r/MensRights22/08/21 06:47 AM
-1

You said: What is even worse is how stupid these boys are for standing there and taking it. What actually happened: Many of the boys don't do that, and instead pre-emptively cunt-punch the girl trying to dick-punch them. Conclusion: You're not watching the same video I am.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 01:24 AM
-14

Considering how many cunt-punches I saw in that video, what're you talking about?
/r/MensRights14/07/21 03:52 PM
1

You're absolutely right that it's evidence of care, not safety, but I disagree with it being directly gender-based. I don't think it is. I think it's association-based and principally a thing women do for those they've associated with recently. And so indirectly, since women associate with other women more often than with men, it happens to women a lot more. For example, I had a girl I knew that I went clubbing with a few times, and she'd always text people afterwards to make sure everyone got h…
/r/MensRights03/07/21 12:00 AM
12

Does Australia legally define forced envelopment as rape? It's not defined that way everywhere, and journalists are probably held to the legal standard when it comes to questions of libel/slander. (All this question does is identify which institution is being sexist here, a news outlet or a government)
/r/MensRights29/06/21 02:51 AM
28

Lord Farquad was being sincere as well.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 11:21 PM
-1

17% downvotes on the women's one, and let's assume about half are the equivalent of people who'd downvote the men's one, that's still going to be way more than the downvotes on the men's. The real observation is the difference in enthusiasm. How is it, in a world where supposedly everything is about serving men, people only give a shit about protecting women from sexual harassment, from men?
/r/MensRights28/03/21 10:05 PM
6

If she's working too, absolutely agree, but if she's just a homemaker? It doesn't take a 40-hour work week of time to do household chores.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 10:45 PM
4

It's also hilarious/fucked how they're insinuating a man's only value is...in his ability to get women. Could you imagine the outrage if that were reversed? Could you imagine the outrage if a man took that at face value? Y'know, got mad because he had no value because he couldn't get laid or alternatively just stopped waiting for consent, because his value is measured in pussies he's attained, not his morals? Oh wait, both those groups exist and feminists(along with most other people) hate it.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:21 PM
3

Do you have any idea the percent of rape cases that actually result in a conviction? It’s less than 5%. By the facts you've given, then, we must conclude, that the other 95+% are examples where we cannot assert that these men factually raped anyone. Which is the opposite of what you do in this next sentence: I can assure you (and this is backed by facts not your own emotions) that far more men are let off when they did in fact rape someone because of lack of evidence than are falsely accused and…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 10:04 PM
2

Ok, and hear me out here, but you get the car that fits the task you want to apply it to. Only soyboy herd idiots show up to a construction site in a Ferrari. The Alphas? They show up with pickups, cause they've got the car that fits their task. So get the car to fit the task you want, and stop giving a damn how it "looks" beyond what's necessary. Cue Top Gear talk. Cue Jay Leno and his massive collection of cars that have a wide variety of looks. A Ferrari is a sports car, and very much built f…
/r/TheRedPill19/02/21 07:06 PM
1

Have you tried straight-razor shaving? I've heard it's an actually enjoyable process, generally speaking, so that might also hold true in your case.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 01:27 PM
10

Yes, because they're invincible to one of the strongest weapons Feminists use for male men's right advocates.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 03:38 AM
2

More likely that they're just used to dealing with her bad attitude.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:05 PM
1

Back in the 80s, a mid-life crisis meant spending beyond one's limits or acting with disregard for the relationships one has built up over years or decades. This was usually in the -form- of buying sports cars, but the behavior was obviously harmful. But like all things that exist as a matter of degree, the borders of the definition were worn away and the term began to apply to stable individuals for whom it was never meant, or else a shaming term for those trapped in admittedly awful relationsh…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 06:55 AM
10

She implied all the rest of the guys were ribbing him, meanwhile it was probably just one dude muttering 2 or 3 words of mild curiosity or puzzlement. Guys rib each other over doing nice things all the time, but it's not meant to curtail the behavior. It's almost always in the same tone as when one guy starts talking about his sweetheart and the others rib him for that, which isn't meant to stop him from being mushy with his sweetheart.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 10:51 PM
1

This assumes that men are by default predators until proven otherwise which pisses me off. As written, no it doesn't. As written, it assumes a far lesser claim, that it's in the best interest of the female child to not be adopted by a random male adult seeking to adopt.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 04:30 PM
3

Whoops, got the wrong impression from her, it seems. Fixed.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 02:41 PM
10

Contact a Men's Rights focused attorney, such as the one /u/thefudmaster is referencing. That is your only goal at the moment. When you contact them, lay out your issue, and then ask "Do you know someone who can help me?". Don't expect your first contact to be a person who can help, but these people travel in the same circles, so if Michael Waddington(fud's guy) can't help you, they probably know someone who can.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 02:22 PM
2

Same thing that brings you around here, probably. Neither of you are what could be called "locals".
/r/TheRedPill10/12/19 10:28 PM
6

Both halves of a woman's sexual strategy are rational in origin. The irrationality is failing to recognize that splitting the halves into the AF/BB pattern is predatory on her part, mostly in that she expects men to not construct counter-strategies to AF/BB.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/18 10:22 PM
-1

Why not both?
/r/MensRights02/11/18 08:27 PM
7

Oh, well fuck her then, I missed that.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 01:19 PM
60

Our objection is that she diddled a kid. Her defense is that it was a consequence of a combination of her kink and her dom. Remove the dom, ostensibly less likely to re-offend. Sound internal logic, but it's bullshit because the primary problem with kid-diddling is that it happens, not that it's associated with a particular kink in kid-diddling. Idgaf if she 'wanted' to do it; she did it, and willingly. That's the big problem here. Women like her shouldn't be allowed around children, holy fuck.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 07:53 AM
1

That's not an "average" woman. Don't lose sight of reality, dude.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/18 05:47 PM
1

It's too plausible to be -worth- fighting the reality of it without evidence to the contrary. Especially because it's a distraction from the issue of people actually dying; it can be dismissed on the simple grounds of triage.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:52 PM
6

Just don't knock lifting He's not knocking lifting. He's placing success and ambition above it in the general sense.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/18 03:26 PM
1

I am a self professed liberal A Sommers/Sargon-Liberal, an American-Liberal or a Lockean-Liberal? Cause.....unless you're referring to American-Liberals, "I am usually to the left of everyone" isn't true, and if you -are-, you're basically claiming to hold the same beliefs as Spez, which....makes me question the rest of your post.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/18 05:55 PM
2

Ok, this is the single most baffling gender-specificity I've seen on this subreddit. If boys shouldn't be sent to these schools, neither should girls. Those bitchy teachers who abuse peoples' sons would just convert peoples' daughters into the next generation of themselves.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/18 02:42 PM
7

It's apparently from a commercial, but the writer's sentiment is supposedly written with the intent to reflect Jordan's opinions. http://archive.is/w1R1U What's more, it's a reproducable sentiment by anyone here who's achieved something. I'm just crediting Jordan because he -did- say it.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 05:22 AM
1

Well that's bunk. You guys get too many RP-Ragers here for that to be a useful endeavor.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 04:52 AM
3

Yeah, I don't post here often, figured in-sub links would be cool. Figured wrong. I'll grab archive links next time.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 03:59 AM
175

I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed. -Michael Jordan My favorite quote along this line.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 01:49 AM
4

A and C, that's when things get difficult. Honestly I've been reading TRP for a long time, and this is the first thing I've seen somebody mention , "Be fun to be around" of course it makes perfect sense. http://archive.is/Nvm5N http://archive.li/I1ZYF http://archive.li/H172F In this thread: http://archive.li/g0Ctz If no Joe Schmoe was able to go from getting none to getting some, then that's worrying. You're back to caring about failures, or you wouldn't be asking this question. People are obvio…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/18 09:02 PM
10

You have exactly two options: Be pathetic and give up now Do things that would benefit you -anyway- that also make you attractive to women. Like....really, the three main tenants of TRP are: A. Have Strong frame B. Take care of your body C. Be fun to be around Whine all you want about it, but I guarantee you, if you make solid gains in those three areas, you'll be happier with your life, regardless of how much you got laid. Even better, you'll probably get laid. Examples seem to be pretty rare. …
/r/TheRedPill30/04/18 08:01 PM
8

A supplemental point I learned the hard way: Learn her Father's relationship with her Mother How she sees Dad treat Mom is how she'll expect you to treat her, by default. If her Dad is submissive, she will expect you to be submissive. If Dad vacillates between abusive and aloof, expect reasonable(and -legal-) forms of escalation to be treated as abuse. Particular warning sign: Dad is given a "domain", but Mom has none. Mom implicitly has dominion over everything else. Focus on Mom's emotions and…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/18 10:36 PM
5

We're not. We're the first society in ALL of human history that can afford to believe the bullshit long enough to need to be redpilled. Ain't no such thing as a feminist when literally everyone is starving. Go back into history. Adultery used to be a capital offense. In the same places/religions that allowed polygamy. Why was cheating a death penalty when men could have as many sex partners as they could afford to feed? Because women would cheat, obviously. Most women aren't THAT dumb, but let's…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/18 12:01 AM
28

It is "taboo", but the reason is because blood is hard to clean up, and the taboo is older than our ability to clean up blood reliably. Afaik, there's no good reason to care in the age of condoms, washing machines and showers. Just be clean about it, and keep in mind that periods aren't safer for anything except pregnancy, so keep the condom unless you're sure she's clean and you're exclusive.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/18 06:14 PM
8

This is literally the most cucked political opinion you could've imagined, posted as a TRP opinion. Wow. Literally everything we know about math and politics suggests that activism MATTERS. Damore wasn't silenced, he was exalted as a martyr-alive. What was an irrelevant memo of an irrelevant team-member of Google is now being read by millions while Damore talks to tens of millions, spreading his story. Fix yourself, then fix the world from the local outward.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/18 06:25 PM
2

no cultures with one woman having multiple men Not quite right, there ARE cultures where such things are far more common, but those cultures are just not successful in the long run. It creates a lot of wasted effort, even worse in older cultures where resource management was far more critical.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/18 05:46 AM
1

I'm not saying they're liars, I'm saying that people evolve. That she may have married a guy who was in shape, or had a good job, or other markers of "quality" who then doesn't have to try anymore once he's married. Right, but that generally doesn't happen outside of things like....tragedy. Most people, especially people without self-criticism, are fairly static in how they want to interact with the world, it's just the circumstances around them that are changing. That lazy guy who gained 100lbs…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 08:40 PM
2

Low-quality men are not generally high-quality liars. They don't possess some weird magic that prevents discovery of these problems. This is the same silly magical thinking that leads League of Legends players to believe in Elo-Hell. Blame everyone else and don't look at one's own problems. Also rather hilarious that you responded to my gender-neutral post with a HIGHLY gendered rebuttal. Did you do that on purpose or was that just an oopsie?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 08:16 PM
1

No one mentioned anything related to the quality of the relationship. True. Fortunately for me, I didn't rely on that presumption. My point wasn't that someone said something about the quality of a relationship, but that -you- said something about deciding relationships based on feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 02:25 AM
6

Not all divorced women suck (there i said it). Well...here's the counterpoint: If a person chooses a person to be in a relationship with, that means they thought that person was of a similar quality. And then when the relationship disintegrates, that fact stays -true-. So the divorced women who don't suck would be of one of two groups: Those who are VERY easily duped. Those who took responsibility for their own low-quality aspects that led to them picking their first husband. Shrewd dindu-nuffin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 01:59 AM
2

She didnt do anything physical, man. Just caught feelings. Then realized she had those feelings, broke it off with you and then ended up with him. I really hate the idea that relationships should be predicated on feelings when feelings are as whimsical as they are in people. There's every reason, as far as I can tell, to believe that the opposite is true, that your feelings should be predicated on the quality of the relationship you've created.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 01:49 AM
10

There's a practical aspect, since they rode the same uber. If he locks the purse in his room/apartment, it's untouchable while he's out with her, but since they're leaving together, she's guaranteed to get it back unless something goes gawdawful wrong. So she's planning to have a good date, at the very least. Poor execution on her part.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 01:36 PM
3

You need to fail. Ill say this again, you need to fail. It also needs to be that person's fault. If you blame anyone but yourself for problems in your life, that's when TRP starts failing for you because that's simply not how it works. Gotta take responsibility for the failure, or else you'll never grow. (Not contradicting, just appending)
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 11:32 PM
6

My problem with him is that he ridicules me and throws jabs my way to a lot of things I say in the office. He does this to almost everyone and doesn't single me out, but this behavior is getting to me. He's giving you gentle shit-tests, and you're FAILING them. Stop failing his shit-tests and start passing them like you want to actually be friends with the dude later. Guys do this to other guys as a stock-standard way of building a repertoire. I overheard two other dudes walking into the grocery…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/18 11:30 PM
3

There's SO many similarities between employment and relationships it is silly. Perseverance makes sense for pursuing quality women/employees because a quality person is going to commit to you and enrich your life/business once hired. Perseverance DOESN'T make sense in an environment with high variance in quality or low quality because you're expending tons of effort with little promise that you'll get return on your investment. In Business, there's a lot of factors that make this much much easie…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/18 10:22 PM
3

Feminism and "Women's Rights" are not synonymous unless you extend both terms as such to be almost completely meaningless. If you take a more meaningful approach of defining Feminism as the belief held by the average person who self-identifies as such, and defining Women's Rights as being about the Natural Rights of women, as per Locke, then the two positions are in opposition.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:51 PM
1

This is why we have a disdain for PUA at TRP to an extent. My disdain for PUA is about goals and philosophy, not technique. I'm not a big fan of 1-night stands. I want an LTR, and I want to actually become the man, not just fake it. But I still glean from PUA because good technique is good technique. I'll figure out how to integrate it into a self-actualization philosophy.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 06:16 PM
2

Honestly, unless you think they're suggesting platonic dating, they're already doing it. Men are being called transphobic for not wanting to "date" trans. You pretty much have to assume that means platonic to believe its not already happening.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 06:13 PM
1

Muslims believe Allah is the same god as the other Abrahamic religions. Jews and Christians do not believe that. And from a purely literary standpoint, the God represented in the Bible is NOT the same God represented in the Koran. Muslims get around this by saying the bible was corrupted and that we have no legitimate copies, but you can't get around the fact that the Modern Koran's "God" is not the same as the Modern Bible's "God". Similarly, but to a lesser extent(Because Christianity more sim…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/17 04:05 AM
5

If she didn't believe Allah was real than her god wasn't real If you don't believe Unicorns are real, than Horses aren't real either. Your point sucks, on its face, even under the presumption that Atheists are right. A disproof of Allah may or may not be equally applicable towards disproving Jehovah, but there's nothing fundamental about "disproof of God A" that extends to "disproof of all Gods", in exactly the same way that you can't disprove horses by talking about Unicorns. Sets and subsets, …
/r/TheRedPill25/12/17 03:02 AM
1

So, here's the thing, first off, if you're failing in your advice with EVERYONE, you're probably needing improve your delivery somehow. Quality of info, quality of delivery, selection of advice, something needs work. People who give good advice don't have 100% failure rates. Doesn't happen. Second, just because a suite of advice "works" does not mean it'll work for a particular student "now". Sure, maybe X, Y and Z would help, but what that student needs "now" is something completely different t…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/17 08:34 AM
12

Your friend should take her to the hospital, get a copy of the report, and then immediately take her to the police station to fill out a report of the crime. One of two things will happen: Your friend will look like the amazing protector that he is or her lies will be exposed for what they are. Either way, he'll know where he stands.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 04:57 PM
17

You'r emissing the point. /u/TangoZulu is asserting that there was no nurse or doctor at all, and the girl is lying about it.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/17 04:55 PM
44

So does "I'm sorry, I was wrong, and I know how much I hurt you." Be careful with that sort of blind word-count analysis, it can lead to overly-superficial results.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/17 09:50 PM
2

Afaik: PUA are all, by definition, red-pill'ed. TRP is primarily PUA-based, but since PUAs are red-pilled, so is TRP. While other branches of the red-pill manosphere are perfectly welcome here, this is primarily a PUA space. For instance, I'm personally against the PUA-exclusive ideas(such as strategizing for plates instead of LTRs), but I feel like I could post discussions on that, or discussions on MGTOW vs. Trad-Cons, on this subreddit. I'd just be in the minority.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/17 05:22 PM
3

This subreddit, and OP, too often for my tastes, seem to forget this and just assume they all WILL.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/17 10:20 PM
15

Most men should be working 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, so its not like most of us should be in a situation where a natural setup is unavailable. And for those who aren't working ~40 hours a week: Odds are: get a job.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 09:48 PM
4

So here's a question, is mastery truly possible? Or is it not? Generally speaking, most people who have stopped "looping" and stopped at #3 seem to believe it is not actually a possibility, but rather a direction of travel. Like the last countable number. Does the last countable number really exist? Or, upon finding it, is there suddenly always more numbers to count? In math, for countable numbers, there's always more numbers. I see expertise the same way. Always progressing, never final.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/17 08:26 PM
3

Imho: Interest Thinking you have learned and know everything Finally realizing you know absolute jack shit and you begin learning Go to #2 Mastery.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/17 06:34 PM
1

You're making the false assumption that the ~50% of people who never get divorced are in happy marriages. No I'm fucking not. I never once mention the word "happy" nor is that contextually relevant to what I said. And besides, consider the number we're starting at anyway . . . HALF?? Where I come from, 50% is a failing grade. Totally agree. 50% is bad enough, no need to do what the guy I was responding to was doing and pretend like it was 0%.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/17 08:18 PM
9

You do realize, that redpill doesn't change the fact that some ~50% of marriages never get divorced. Not once, for any reason. That's ignoring reasons that -don't- boil down to hypergamy. Yes, hypergamy is shit, but that's not the experience of at least half of men who get married. Its a dangerous game, but if you go in knowing the odds, the rules, and which women play for keeps and which women play for cheats, you can come out of this with really good odds of a life-long marriage. But that does…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/17 03:02 AM
2

One question that, imho, must be answered a certain way for a chick to be worth marrying: Do you believe in moral absolutes, or are they relative? Ask her in a playful time when she's not expecting you to be serious. Y'know, a fun question for philosophizing. Do NOT marry a relativist. They're the strong hamsters who divorce you later.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 02:01 AM
2

There SHOULD be a double standard, imho. Or to put it another way: Do you have a double standard when you feed Dogs X and feed Cats Y? Yes and no. Yes, men and women should have different standards of conduct, but Women shouldn't be notably advantaged for it, nor should they be allowed to abuse men with it. For instance, no amount of redpilling will convince me that its equally ok to hit men and women. I have a double standard there. On the flipside, I'll come down HARD on my daughters if I catc…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/17 04:38 PM
9

Fucking THANK YOU. I get sick and tired of reading all the ragers pass off their bitterness about swallowing the pill as actual theory. I'd love to see this stickied.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/17 11:08 PM
2

Form follows function. To the Atheist, the function of the individual is reproduction, ultimately(Source: Richard Dawkins), and not just in the simplistic #ofBabies sense, but in the long-term 20 generations from now sense. Male -and- female observable mating strategies fall immediately out of this viewpoint: Men R or K select, and Women alpha-fuck(maximizes sperm quality) and beta-buck(maximizes her childrens' resources). Now, ask yourself a simple question: What does having a career have to do…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 09:40 PM
2

The idea I've been brewing on is this: Don't be a consumer of things, be a doer and producer of things.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 03:05 AM
2

We had a system for this. Marriage without no-fault divorce is and strict social censure for sex outside marriage, fundamentally, ensures that high-value men/women don't warp the system around themselves.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/17 04:54 AM
2

We had such an easy system for this, too: Stay married.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/17 12:00 AM
1

All hypergamy is is self-interest optimized instinctively. Its behaving without regard to the "damage" caused to others through emotional attachment, y'know, exactly like men who pump'n'dump. These things aren't morally different.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 09:47 PM
2

It entirely depends on what one means by "AWALT", really. If "like that" means gyno-centric instinctually-hypergamous shit-testing women who are more focused on what you can do for them than what they can do for you, then yeah, AWALT. At that point, its just the gender-bend of AMALT accurately described. Can confirm with basically all my female relatives. If "like that" means cock-carousel-riding cheating gold-digging whores, then no, not AWALT. That's no more true than its gender-bend of Chad T…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 09:43 PM
1

Pretty sure the "dad bod" means less definition and more burly, not that we can't give up the gym entirely. Less Arnold Schwarzenegger in his muscle days and more Brian Shaw.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/17 04:01 AM
6

League of Legends was my hardest redpill moment, man. Its not "video games", its "wasting time" that's the issue. If you play video games constructively, they're fine.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 11:24 PM
1

We only saw the aping up and fight part, so I agree its POSSIBLE for something additional to have happened, but you can only draw lessons from the example as given, not from things that may or may not have happened offscreen. That's it for my point. As for bar-drama, got no idea what proportions are, but I've told a guy to fuck off once when he was hitting on a friend of a friend who was clearly not into him. Entire interaction lasted 5s, cost me absolutely nothing, and improved the quality of m…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 10:42 PM
-1

Women are children, treat them as such Uh, let's avoid drawing lessons from a situation that are utterly irrelevant to the situation, eh? No woman behaved like a child in that clip. Don't take a stand for shit that isn't your business Wrong lesson, but at least this is in the video. The lesson is: Don't escalate a situation and then assault people(breaking the law) just because someone hurled an insult.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/17 05:36 AM
3

Considering you can overdose on water, yes, you can.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/17 05:15 AM
9

Cold sores(HSV-1) are NOT an STD anymore than the Flu or Measles are STDs. My brother caught it when he was like....10, well before he started dating. Gawd man, get some help.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/17 02:19 AM
24

I don't mind -honest- gold diggers as much, and don't even call them such. Its the dishonest ones that lie about it when it matters, like to the guy they're telling they're on the pill when they're not. I mean, if you call all women who're having sex for money gold-diggers, then its a fundamental coraly of that and AWALT that all women are gold-diggers.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/17 12:26 AM
1

I despise "fake it till you make it" because its a lie. That's not how it works. Well, that's exactly how it works, to those who understand it and say it, but never to those who hear it. See, to people who -hear- this phrase, they hear "you aren't this way, and you're lying if you act this way". And that's wrong. What's true is "we are what we continually do", or to re-structure, "do it, and you become it". As someone hearing this, the false narrative of the "lie" never forms, and the frame is n…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 05:00 AM
3

The real reason is actually far simpler. People complain because people complain. Seriously, no matter what state a video game is in, and no matter how much it has -improved- over the past X years, that game's subreddit will be full of whiners circlejerking over this that or the other thing. This has been one of a few of the most predictive truths I've learned playing League of Legends. Often, its weakness expressing itself, and as far as I can tell, the only remedy for this is to do. Find somet…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 11:00 PM
4

He's.....using incident rates per capita of American......which is a lot like using the incident rate per capita of American to represent Elephant stampedes or Panda Bear attacks. We don't have many Muslims, Pandas or Elephants in America, so in each case, OF COURSE attacks by the aforementioned will be low, as a per-capita of Americans. Morons. What about per-capita of Muslims in America? Hmmm? What about looking at countries with higher rates of Muslim refugees, like Sweden, France or Germany,…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 09:23 PM
5

They're not liberals, they're progressives(you probably called them liberals out of convenience). Fuck them.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 08:19 PM
2

I've learned more about trp from league of legends than from most rl men I've known.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 06:02 PM
1

And almost none of them involve asymmetric welfare funding of one gender over the other.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 11:25 PM
1

SMV for men is based, in part, on our capability of providing resoruces. If the government takes our resources and provides them to women, without charge to those women, it inherently harms men's SMV.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 11:14 PM
2

Men pay the majority of the taxes, women withdraw the majority of benefits from welfare programs. This is basic red-pill expectations of what happens in any country that begins adopting a welfare state. http://judgybitch.com/2016/08/16/reblog-research-find-that-as-a-group-only-men-pay-tax/
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 05:11 AM
1

The classic liberals(Sargon/Rubin types) are trying to reclaim the title "liberal" while shoving Clinton/Sanders types into the label "progressives".
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 05:04 AM
6

I've been analyzing bosses against TRP theory, and the best bosses -always- yield ground 'within frame' to their subordinates management. But the thing is, the subordinate management is also expected to toe the line. Mostly, this is about process. The leader sets processes and runs the ship sometimes. His assistants runs the ship according to the processes while he's gone. A good leader defends the assistant against anyone defying the process, but does not defend an assistant that "goes rogue" a…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 12:40 AM
1

That's nice you believe politicians Only slightly more than I believe you. universal healthcare Yeah no, he's not the smallest possible politician on that, but his platform was savings accounts, not "universal healthcare" the wall deportation force for Mexicans 1.You're double-billing 2.This isn't a "not small government" issue, and is one of the few issues the Federal Government is explicitly supposed to be paying attention to. monitoring and registration program for Muslims Look, you've clearl…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 07:12 AM
1

Do you even read? Seriously, Trump RAN on small government, as seen in various positions he's put on his personal platform such as: "Decrease the size of our already bloated government after a thorough agency review." https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/ So shut the fuck up with your baseless accusations.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 05:20 AM
1

Isn't that what the conservatives want too? I mean, both parties are both open about wanting to rule. This isn't a surprise. No, its not the same thing. Wanting as small a government as possible with as few interventionary policies as possible is not the same thing as "wanting to rule" the country.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 03:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter