TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GoldenFutureForUs Archive

View 4 posts and 90 comments by GoldenFutureForUs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
116

He’s young, give him some slack.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 12:28 PM
14

A big problem is basically women using their ego to dictate dating. They want the best men to ask her out, because it boosts her ego. This isn’t sustainable though, because the ego will turn a man down once she finds an imperfection (spoiler: we’re all imperfect, so no man will be good enough). She’ll do this until she hits the wall, then she’ll realise her options are vastly reduced. Only then (usually her 30s) will she ignore her ego and start actually approaching dating in a healthy way. Only…
/r/MensRights07/06/25 10:38 AM
16

The ‘keeping women out of prison’ policy is the worst in my opinion. Literally saying ‘men deserve prison but women don’t - but the exact same crime’. Literal state enforced sexism.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:57 PM
2

She’s definitely mentally ill.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 12:03 PM
1

I think aspects of it are becoming mainstream, whilst other parts aren’t. Parts that are becoming mainstream: criticism of feminism, criticism of women’s dating patterns (also how to capitalise on this), rejecting the constant misandry in education, the media etc., realising that traditional masculinity has so many healthy benefits for men. Parts that are being rejected: toxic influencers that try to hijack mensrights. Tate for example will likely be imprisoned in the U.K. for human trafficking.…
/r/MensRights27/05/25 09:28 AM
124

Yeah, they started ‘dating’ when he was 14. Her child was literally in his class. His parents found out, demanded she stopped grooming him and she said ‘maybe’. She then proceeded to continue grooming him until he became an adult - by which point they became a public couple.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 10:29 AM
335

She groomed him as a schoolboy. She was his teacher at school, she groomed him then left her husband for him. Of course she doesn’t respect him, she sees him as beneath her.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 10:25 AM
6

Men kill themselves 5 times more than women - yet of course women need more mental health support. Any political party that supports this view will never get my vote.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 12:43 AM
14

I agree. Men often assume the woman is just as romantic, when the truth is the woman is using them. What I find hilarious is the feminist focus of ‘women need to out-earn men! The future is female!’. That’s great, so does that mean they’ll marry a man that earns less? They’ll pay the majority of the mortgage? They’ll pay for dates? Surely they should right, if they earn more? Of course not - they want to have their cake and eat it too. They want the best bits of supremacy without the sacrifices.…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 12:35 AM
20

Somehow, I don’t think a 12 year old girl would be charged. Different story when it’s a 12 year old boy.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 08:49 PM
29

History would suggest revolutions. This may just be a quiet one though - exiting society without overthrowing the government.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 09:24 PM
7

Because the Japanese view having children as only something that should occur within a marriage. They are very traditional.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 09:23 PM
2

Society clearly doesn’t treat men as equal to women. Misandry like this is commonplace. Do what you can to change the tide - whether that’s vote, protests etc. Misandry like this needs to be removed from society.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 10:10 AM
80

“This approach ensures that boys’ and men’s disadvantages are hidden, and that “parity” will not be achieved until women are in an equal or superior position on every single factor in the entire GGGI index. No one would know this unless they slogged all the way through to Appendix A on page 64 of the 2024 report, which acknowledges this methodological sleight of hand: Hence, the index rewards countries that reach the point where outcomes for women equal those for men, but it neither rewards nor …
/r/MensRights18/05/25 09:38 AM
55

That’s normally said by single women. They’re single because they turn down 90% of men. Their income is obviously a factor. It’s just virtue signalling - pretending to be progressive when they actually want a masculine man to be the breadwinner.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 03:24 PM
45

They want supremacy, but they don’t want to provide. Funnily enough, men were happy to provide for centuries. Maybe we shouldn’t be encouraging women to earn more than men if they won’t support a family?
/r/MensRights06/05/25 03:22 PM
2

That sounds really tough. I’m sorry that happened. Did the first two husbands both promise to have children before marriage, then go back on it after?
/r/MensRights05/05/25 10:17 AM
6

It’s also … not romantic at all. Why choose IVF when it’s far less natural and loving compared to natural pregnancy? I’m assuming they’re all single and can’t attract the type of man they want … if they even exist.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 10:05 AM
7

I think these women know … they just can’t accept it yet. Sure, they can wait until 40 - but they may be so infertile by that point that they can’t get pregnant. If they do, their child has a high chance of Down syndrome or autism. I doubt that’s what they want. Maybe they’re ‘professionally’ intelligent, but lack common sense?
/r/MensRights05/05/25 10:04 AM
0

A lot of single women are delusional about the reality of their dating situation. They think the perfect man is just around the corner … despite not having found him for 5 years plus. They’ll happily wait it out, not realising the most attractive men get snatched up earliest. By the time they’re 30, they’re visibly ageing and the type of man they’re looking for is most likely interested in younger women. By 35, they’re really starting to decline in fertility and all remaining eggs have a much hi…
/r/MensRights05/05/25 10:02 AM
5

She sounds pretty miserable.
/r/MensRights29/04/25 11:10 PM
20

That being a stay at home mother is a full-time job. Women act like this is unpaid labour. Guess what? Men have to slave away to earn enough to support their whole family only on their income. Then, when they get home - stressed and exhausted, their stay at home wife suddenly expects them to do their ‘fair share’ of chores. No. If you’re a stay at home mother, you do at least 90% of all chores. You have no roof over your head without your husband. You reckon being a mum is a full-time job? So is…
/r/MensRights26/04/25 09:23 PM
6

It’s the latter. They understand the problem, they just don’t want to help men. They want women to have even more power and influence. So they’ll window dress it - whilst suggesting the problem is actually toxic masculinity, misogyny, mental health or any over manipulative jargon to distract men from the real problems. Of course, if you attempt to bring it back to the real problems - they just smear you as a misogynistic incel. These people don’t care about helping men.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:58 AM
5

They’ll quite happily smear Men’s Rights as a misogynistic group, when it’s literally just men fighting for equal rights. Then men will continue to vote for more radical parties - the ones that at the very least offer lip service to their struggles. Mainstream politics can ignore male suffering as long as it wants, but when will just replace them with more radical parties. Parties that don’t ignore them.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:35 AM
12

No! You can’t notice that boys face prejudice in schools. 75% of teachers being women, that mark boys lower than girls for the same work, is a bias that must be ignored! Of course, boys recognising this institutional bias against them at a young age will seek alternative authority figures. People that say they’ll empower them and improve their lives - not push them down and disadvantage them while their brain’s still developing. It’s a complete enigma why boys are choosing male social media infl…
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:26 AM
33

To be fair, if you demonise more boys at a young age, more will grow up to have mental health issues as adult men. Then, Movember becomes more relevant, the charity gets more money - business booms. They’ve figured out how to expand their enterprise by further shaming young boys.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:21 AM
44

Imagine if a female rights group was ~75% run by men. It would never happen - it would be protested against, black-listed etc. When it’s a men’s rights group - it’s diverse and inclusive to have women make up ~75% of the leadership. What a win for equality 🙄
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:19 AM
17

It will definitely involve replacing ‘toxic masculinity’ with ‘feminist dating’. These words have lost all meaning and are used to manipulate men through shaming.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 11:36 PM
45

The problem is, they’ll offer PC advice that doesn’t fully address the situation and offer realistic solutions. I’m not someone that fully agrees with the Red Pill, but parts where it’s brutally honest about what works in dating, what turns women on etc. will not be taught by these so called ‘Dating Coaches’. It will be what teenage boys are always taught; be nice to women, treat them well, be respectful and she might give you a chance. That’s literally why ‘Nice Guys’ exist! They’ve been taught…
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:28 PM
52

Do they not realise that’s literally what the Red Pill offers? I thought they were against that?
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:08 PM
101

Don’t forget, traditional relationships are oppressive and evil. Letting your woman cheat on you repeatedly is empowering for her.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 09:49 PM
10

It’s so clearly about female supremacy. When would any man support it?
/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:46 PM
3

Because that hasn’t been happening until now?
/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:46 PM
6

Based on?
/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:45 PM
0

Get your misandrist comments out of here.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:45 PM
3

Feminism isn’t about equality. So why would men support it?
/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:44 PM
1

People hate on men like this, then are baffled when they vote for Donald Trump. At least he didn’t spend his campaign shaming and belittling men like Kamala. I don’t even like Trump, but it’s common sense.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 08:44 PM
102

Honestly, these women just hate men. The female equivalent of the men they’re talking about would be a 7 or 8. They can’t get past their hate of men, so they see anyone that isn’t model tier as average. Have you seen the hate comments about Ryan Gosling? Women in their thousands call him average. Lol, he is at least an 8 out of 10. He’s not a supermodel, but he’s well above average. Yet women can’t stand him because he gets Margot as his equivalent in Barbie, plus other attractive women in other…
/r/MensRights05/04/25 06:51 PM
10

You’ve linked examples from America, when Adolescence is clearly set in the UK. Want to find some relevant sources?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 12:29 PM
89

Anyone who thinks Adolescence is necessary viewing for the nation’s boys.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 07:30 PM
108

Demonising boys across the nation because a few demented boys is insane. It’s also misandry - but I know politicians don’t care about that. Especially Labour MPs.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 06:57 PM
117

The demonisation of boys will continue until we have a far-right government. It’s obvious Labour don’t care about actually helping struggling boys. Boys literally face systemic bias, where teachers mark them lower for the same work as girls. They’re failing school and university due to this bias - thus rebelling against authority. Starmer is so out of touch - I can’t wait for him to be voted out.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 06:21 PM
132

Literal government propaganda being force fed as fact to children. This used to be called authoritarian - does that make me far-right for calling it out?
/r/MensRights31/03/25 06:19 PM
3

Starmer doesn’t care about men failing. He doesn’t care. He can say what he wants but until he brings in a couple Ministers for men, starts funding specific groups for men’s mental health, starts ensuring boys succeed in school again and removes female university scholarships - he is all bark and no bite.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 01:10 AM
120

It’s desperation and insecurity. They think they’re ’beating’ men by not dating them. Really, no man wants to be with them and they’re taking themselves out of the gene pool. It’s a massive self-own.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 01:07 AM
38

They’ve been told their whole lives that women are superior and men are inferior. Of course they’re repulsed by the bottom 80% - they’ve been told they’re beneath them. Women are the best and deserve love instead of men. Of course more women are dating each other. Far less sex, however.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 01:06 AM
8

Is it a fantasy? Most men I know would want their wife to work too. Definitely not 80%+ wanting their wife to not work.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 04:14 PM
48

I’d like to add, the majority of modern women are absolutely begging to be stay at home mothers! They’re looking for the most stereotypical traditional men: enough income to support a family without the wife working. They’re also looking for traditional masculine traits: tall, strong, authoritative, ambitious etc. The farce is that they pretend to want a lifelong career, but once a rich enough man settles for them - they stop working. They absolutely do not want to work and be a mother. It’s jus…
/r/MensRights21/03/25 11:42 AM
24

Classic Labour. Feminism front and centre - nothing for men. Then they get angry men turn against them. They clearly don’t care about men’s rights.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 08:27 PM
1

I’ll tell you why. Basically, they don’t want to solve the problems that cause boys to seek these influencers. They want to silence the dissent - because clearly Labour aren’t interested in improving outcomes for boys/men. Boys are absolutely suffering in their education and Labour does NOTHING to help them. Men graduate from uni at far lower levels than women - yet Labour continue to say more women are needed in STEM. Labour are only upset boys/men are protesting against the system that subdues…
/r/MensRights20/03/25 08:26 PM
351

Objectifying women is bad! That’s why we’ll only show naked men. That way, only men get objectified. What a win for feminism!
/r/MensRights19/03/25 03:39 PM
3

It’s funny how you complain that women are blaming modern day men for the sins of men that died decades ago - then women respond in a way that completely proves your point. Just ignore them - these women hate men and would rather be alone than consider being affectionate towards a man.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 08:17 PM
14

Gen Z has definitely been the tipping point. Millennials love feminism, Gen Z has realised it’s gone too far.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 09:50 PM
11

They’ll do anything but address the root cause of the problems that cause men to listen to online influencers. If they actually cared about men suffering, there wouldn’t be this issue. They’ll continue to demonise boys at school - then wonder why these boys listen to men that validate them.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:49 PM
14

The left obviously doesn’t care about men. If they did, they’d campaign about it.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 10:43 AM
12

They literally have two opinions on work. Either feminism is winning and women are crushing it, or there’s an evil patriarchal pay gap which must be destroyed. Either way, the motive is female dominance. They don’t want men succeeding unless it benefits them (usually paying off a big mortgage while they scroll TikTok).
/r/MensRights10/03/25 12:01 AM
15

Absolutely. The Guardian is so left wing, it thinks the current Labour government are right wing. Yeah, they’re pretty out of touch with reality. They’re terrified men are moving the Overton window to the right. They desperately want women to earn even more and achieve even higher grades in school. They will pull out all the lies and tricks to convince men to vote for women’s interests over things that benefit men.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 11:58 PM
16

Believe me, Britain is full of people like the author of this article. Every single issue in society is viewed through the lens of ‘how does this impact women?’. There have been more articles recently recognising that young men are suffering. The angles, however, are always that: Men need to be re-educated, so they turn away from men’s activists. These influencers are dangerous and could cause women to lose their privileges. Men need to be helped at school, so there will be more male graduates. …
/r/MensRights09/03/25 11:54 PM
8

Couldn’t even finish the title without making it about women.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 11:39 PM
21

Vance says whatever will gain him support. He doesn’t care about men and was absolutely disgusting last night to Zelenskyy. He’s a weak, pathetic man.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 01:36 PM
2

That’s Elizabeth Holmes.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 06:55 PM
15

I don’t think he’s the immature one.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 09:41 PM
58

A few individuals of half the population are bad. So, the solution is discriminate against the whole group? Imagine if it was any other demographic receiving this discrimination. It wouldn’t be tolerated.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 08:41 AM
71

Believe me when I say, they aren’t going to stop there. They won’t achieve parity, then suddenly stop campaigning for more screen leads. No, they’ll keep wanting more. The same happened with higher education; feminists desperately campaigned for equal graduations of men and women from university. This was back in the 70s. They reached parity in the 90s. Did they stop there? Not at all - they then stated more women needed to graduate from under-represented courses like law, medicine, STEM in gene…
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:55 AM
14

Thanks for doing that - I didn’t want to give them any clicks. That article is actually atrocious. She attributes the drop in marriage rates to the rise in the far-right. It’s a hit piece. The far-right has grown in popularity due to a plethora of reasons - which cover the Western world. That rise only really gathered momentum around 10 years ago. Marriage rates have been dropping for decades. She’s forcing a correlation that is weak at best. Meanwhile, Western nations are importing families fro…
/r/MensRights10/02/25 09:07 AM
18

The amount of articles these days where women are complaining about the lack of ‘good men’. Women wanting an ambitious, highly educated and wealthy man but not finding one. Then you get the articles about middle age women lamenting never getting married and having children. No, women are absolutely not fine with the lack of ‘economically attractive’ men. They don’t realise that’s down to feminism reducing the number of men in higher education.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 08:59 AM
62

Men will keep voting more right wing, women will be clueless as to why. Treating men as lesser beings, compared to women, leads to revolt. They’ll learn the hard way that misandry is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 12:38 PM
5

It’s not about equality, it’s about preference.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 09:16 AM
72

Meanwhile, the government specifically releases women from jail due to their gender. Men don’t get this privilege.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 04:49 PM
6

You see - misandry isn’t illegal. Misogyny is, misandry isn’t.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:50 PM
3

You’d be arrested for being ‘sexist’. Despite the government being the sexist ones.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:49 PM
5

Labour are misandrist. They should never be elected again.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 12:47 PM
7

They don’t want equality anyway. They want preferential treatment. They’re not demanding 50% of all graduates be women. They’re happy with 66% (Western average) being women. They want women to earn more than men, before age 30 (which they already do in the West). They want the ‘cute’ office jobs - they don’t want to be bin-men. It’s buffet equality - picking the best bits.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 10:03 AM
8

They don’t care about men. If men started to ignore feminism, they’d say we’re evil. They don’t care about equality - only supremacy.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 07:26 PM
34

I think it’s something like 88% of all British prisoners are men. So, surely having less men in prison would reduce overcrowding? Oh wait, we can’t do anything that benefits men unless women benefit. But it’s fine when woman are benefitted and men get nothing. Even when it doesn’t make mathematical sense. Pure misandry - I’m sure Jess Philips had a hand in this.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 09:21 PM
12

Like she’d ever provide a fraction of that for her children. Selfish woman.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 04:05 PM
137

Maybe men have had enough of masculinity being demonised?
/r/MensRights09/01/25 12:27 AM
1

Mate I could never imagine kissing a 15 year old at 19. It’s outright disgusting.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 11:09 AM
1

A few reasons, but the main two I’ll summarise: You’re challenging female dominance. Feminism is no longer about equality but supremacy. They don’t care about men equally and feel threatened when men demand equality. They don’t want to admit what they say is a lie. Women pretend they’d marry a man with a lower income, be happy for him to stay at home with the children etc. They of course never choose this when given the option of a man that earns more than them. But this would challenge their se…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 12:46 PM
1

Start caring about men equally. It’s really not hard. Respect and empathy.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 12:43 PM
6

I’m sure they’ll let the husband snoop through her phone? Right?
/r/MensRights05/01/25 12:41 PM
8

There was a Guardian article recently which warned about men who attend the gym becoming more right wing. More testosterone = more right wing, which is not allowed. Masculinity is evil and must be subservient to feminism.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 02:32 PM
191

There was a post in world news recently about how South Korea is now a ‘super ageing’ nation. One of the top comments was how this person had a South Korean girlfriend. The girlfriend said she’d never move back to South Korea because “they hate women”. Now, South Korea currently has compulsory military service for men. Do women have this? No - they have nothing. Men have to give up 18 months of their life to stall their career, otherwise their citizenship is removed. Women can do whatever they w…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 11:53 PM
67

He’s not even been convicted. They’re removing the award based on rumours. What a joke.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 12:11 AM
41

What’s funny is university educated women want a university educated man. Well, if 2 women graduate for every man, at least half of all female graduates won’t get the man they want. Maybe if women weren’t so classist, they’d have more children. After all, men don’t care if their wife is university educated or not. Many are happy for their wives to stay at home and not work at all!
/r/MensRights23/12/24 09:05 AM
157

Jess Phillips is a well known misandrist. She shoots down any motions for helping men’s education and suicide prevention. She laughs at men struggling. She’ll blame anything and anyone she deems a threat to female supremacy.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 02:53 PM
4

Absolutely. Western governments desperately try to get people to have more children. Little do they realise that increasing women’s salaries means they’re less likely to marry, les alone have children. They won’t find men attractive enough due to their lack of education and low earnings. Combine that with the facade of ‘options’ supplied by dating apps, as well as social media inflating standards beyond what is realistic. It really isn’t hard to understand why people aren’t having children - but…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 12:22 AM
16

It’s about female dominance. Let’s not get it confused with equality - that ship sailed long ago. ‘The Future is Female’ is inherently anti-male. Feminism might have stood for equality once - it doesn’t anymore.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 10:39 PM
8

Every year, universities across the West celebrate that women outnumber men. In the U.K. - 2 women graduate for every man. What upsets these universities, however, is that this isn’t the case for every subject. Computer science, many STEM subjects etc. have more men than women. This is obviously sexist and needs to be immediately addressed. Now, graduates earn more than non-graduates on average. Women now out-earn men until their 30s. Why is that? It’s because women choose to become stay at home…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 10:37 PM
2

My barbers are female and always give me a good cut. I get men will understand what men want better, but I’ve never had an issue.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 09:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter