TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GoldenLeopard317 Archive

View 2 posts and 51 comments by GoldenLeopard317 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
208

GeneralGoldenLeopard317/r/MensRights07/08/23 08:58 AM
25

GeneralGoldenLeopard317/r/MensRights03/09/23 12:05 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
43

If he hadn’t the wisdom to employ a forensic accountant, she’d still be rinsing him. Why do courtrooms just take women’s claims as gospel? She obviously overstated how much she ‘deserved’. What a leach.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 11:24 AM
52

Feminists: “The Future is Female”. Men: Ok, we’ll drop out of society then. You can run it. You can be the breadwinner. You can stay lonely with no children. Women: HOW DARE YOU?! I swear these women have neither empathy nor social skills.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 10:15 AM
1

I think it’s loving to guide people when they can’t see how their actions will hurt them in the future. I 100% believe living with a realistic view of dating is better than having delusional high standards. It’s better to see the truth. Believe me I’m also 100% happy for women to have these standards if they want to. Despite the flaws, it’s their life. I find it baffling how most of these women cry when they never have the children and husband they always wanted. It would be funny if they weren’…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 10:53 PM
1

It’s incredibly short sighted and unwise. There are countless examples of people regretting their dating requirements. People do indeed have the right to be wrong, but it wouldn’t be loving to encourage or affirm their wrong decisions. Ultimately, these women are lonely too. I don’t know why you’re focusing on men.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 10:40 PM
2

Right - I’m sure it’s unwise to suggest to someone their dating standards are unrealistic. Every man should never settle for someone less attractive than a super model. It’s their standard after all? Why force them to lower that? It’s not as if people regret having such high standards when they’re old, alone and infertile. No I guess it’s wise to encourage those high standards 👍
/r/MensRights24/08/23 10:31 PM
2

They should 100% lower their standards if they’re unreasonable. If they don’t even meet those standards themselves (high salary, attractive etc) then it’s unreasonable to hold out for that. Many want the best of the best, as if marriages are built on requirements and not love. They can have unreasonable standards if they want, but it’s determining their own downfall.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 10:14 PM
3

It is a problem if they want children and a husband, but none of the men meet their standards? So they spend the rest of their lives heartbroken about the family they never had.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:28 PM
4

It’s ok if the women want to be single. But there are so many articles these days of women claiming there aren’t enough men that meet their standards. They want children and a husband, but the men aren’t educated/don’t earn enough.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 07:57 PM
35

When these boys become men, do the graduate women want to date them. Of course not. They aren’t at their level right? Well maybe stop forcing women into higher education when so many of them want to become stay at home mothers once they’re married. It’s actually such a simple problem to solve, but the female psyche in 2023 U.K. can’t confront that they want a man who earns more and, ideally, is better educated. The women that don’t confront this deserve to stay single and childless, because thei…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 08:14 PM
23

It’s the mark of a self-destructing society. Men instinctively and naturally lead their family. They natural provide and protect. Women are attracted to these qualities. Wonder what the correlation is between low marriage rates and low male education? Women want an educated, ambitious, successful man who can provide for their family. Women date endlessly because the top men don’t commit to them. There literally aren’t enough men that fulfil their standards because of the endless push to get wome…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 08:11 PM
29

Can’t wait for lot’s of things said - but no action to follow. It’s all talk. The sad thing is, I can’t see Labour doing any better for boys in education. Meanwhile, women made up 57.6% of graduates last year https://standout-cv.com/uk-graduate-statistics#:~:text=Business%20studies%20graduates%20achieved%20the,2022%2C%20with%20530%2C170%20women%20graduating. If it were men graduating at that rate, the government would be forging new quotas, schemes and organisations with the sole purpose of putt…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 12:25 PM
101

Fighting for equality by feeding your attention addiction. Sounds like present day feminism to me.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:48 AM
13

Surely windmilling in public fits that definition?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 11:47 AM
3

It’s awful, but then again they do it now because they believe men will always fall at their feet. They won’t feel the same way when they’re 30, single with no kids and want a quality man to marry them.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 08:01 AM
64

I always find it amazing that women have access to more men than ever, yet marriage rates are at their lowest ever. If you’re surrounded by men that want you and you stay unmarried, sustained by antidepressants and cats, then who’s the problem here? Who seems to have unrealistic standards?
/r/MensRights10/08/23 07:19 PM
1

If you’re hiding that from him, what else are you hiding from him?
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:51 PM
6

But feminists complain that those years raising children means the wage gap exists. Why can’t the man spend a few years out raising the children?
/r/MensRights05/08/23 09:07 AM
7

The hours the man works are more valuable. He’s the one paying for the house they live in. Without his work, they wouldn’t have such a high standard of living. That’s part of why she picked him. So, she can reciprocate this value by helping more around the house. Because ultimately, she isn’t paying for said house. Squeezing the man out of his higher income, then belittling him for not doing exactly the same amount of housework is laughable. If she wants exactly 50% then she can start paying for…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 09:03 AM
6

There have been articles complaining about this for at least 10 years.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 09:00 AM
2

When have I mentioned being a plumber? Cherry picking the well paid dirty jobs doesn’t reinforce your arguments. You keep avoiding the fact that someone needs to do the low paid dirty, physical jobs. Women won’t do them so men have to. Not hard to understand? If no one does them then society falls apart.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 08:56 AM
4

Who’s going to do those jobs if men don’t? What happens in your scenario is the government just gets loads of immigrant men to do those jobs. They aren’t advertising to women. Because ultimately society is geared towards women doing the safe, clean jobs.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 08:51 AM
6

Society functions because of men doing the jobs women don’t want to do. Construction, sewage, labouring - essentially the tough, dirty jobs. Their privileged position means they don’t have to do them. Men don’t have that privilege. Those jobs have to be done and men know not enough women will do them.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 08:25 AM
5

The U.K. in general is facing a massive shortage of secondary school teachers. The general consensus for this is: too much unpaid overtime, degrading work environment, short salary ‘ladder’, can get paid more for a different job with the same undergraduate degree etc. Men aren’t being secondary school teachers due to the above, as well as being sidelined by female focused education. Men are also treated with caution around children, whereas women are automatically considered safe. Just so many n…
/r/MensRights04/08/23 05:13 PM
2

Women like to narrow their options as much as possible, then complain that no man measures up. This is, basic mathematics right? You’re allowing only a tiny pool of men to date you, but guess what? You probably won’t meet many, if any men that match that criteria. Those men also probably won’t want to date you, as they’ll have better options 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/MensRights30/07/23 09:45 PM
36

I wonder if they are also the most single and the most childless?
/r/MensRights29/07/23 08:47 PM
1

“Is there still a place for men in the modern world?”. This is why people stop supporting feminism. The argument is feminism creates gender equality, with no patriarchy or matriarchy. But then women start achieving more than men, as they get spoilt with women only investments. They start graduating university in higher numbers. They start earning more than men below 30. They start buying property before men. Suddenly, the question is not “When will we achieve gender equality?” But “What’s the po…
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:34 AM
386

White men live in her head rent free. Her mind is poisoned.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:29 AM
81

I swear the Ken’s are literally second class citizens in the movie? What’s wrong with them fighting for equality? How is that “radicalisation”?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:45 PM
37

I reckon black women are the most religious. If you have objective moral standards for infidelity, that aren’t based on gender, then the gap will be smaller.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:43 PM
20

I wonder what % of these donors are women? Must be the majority. They’re just pandering to their ‘voter base’.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 10:04 PM
5

True, but childcare is also an unpaid job that men do all the time. At least women have the luxury of being a stay at home mother. Society doesn’t usually allow men the same luxury. It’s not about competition, it’s about equality and fair distribution. Isn’t that what feminists want?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 11:03 PM
2

Women have the choice between a nice white collar office job, or a dirty smelly manual labour job. Then, once they get married and have a child, society is happy for them to give up the safe, comfortable office job to become a stay at home mother. Don’t worry about the husband, he’ll break his back for his family. His wife definitely won’t.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:40 PM
5

Men don’t care for children at all, great point from you. In addition, do you think working on an oil rig is cleaner than childcare? Or working on a construction site? Or a railway line?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:39 PM
5

Apparently this is bad for the women. But all I see on social media is women desperately seeking a rich man, so they can become a stay at home mother. Women want this. It’s literally their decision.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:34 PM
7

If a man takes on a higher salary, so his wife can be a stay at home mother, that is the definition of putting his money where his mouth is. He’s voluntarily stressing himself to the max, to pay for his children and his wife. The wife gets a free ride.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:31 PM
29

It won’t change until the education system changes. If women are running the schools, they’re deciding the number of female graduates. Graduates earn more than non-graduates. Female graduates also look down on non-graduates and men that earn less than them. So, even if they do the same job as a man without a degree - they will feel more influential and powerful. They will use HR and office politics to warp the power dynamics to suit them. Until these women have children, the office will be femal…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:47 PM
1

Even if there were enough equal partners, they wouldn’t be happy. They want a richer man - so they can be a stay at home mother. It’s about equality for the things they don’t like, whilst maintaining the unequal things they do like. It’s all selfish entitlement. Thankfully, that delusional mindset leaves them with nobody. Only cats and regret.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 06:58 PM
8

This is literally projection. This woman is definitely more of an incel compared to most of the men in the comments.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 09:36 PM
4

Apparently a lot of them want educated, rich husbands. But there aren’t enough of those for them. By pulling themselves above men, they’re losing out on what they want for the long term. A man who can provide lots of money for her and her children, whilst being of high status and attractiveness. Most of these women won’t marry a man like that.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 12:33 PM
35

Two billionaires planning a fake fight somehow turns her off her date - who is neither of these men. I think she’s mentally unwell.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 10:04 PM
2

Completely depends on the country. Sweden, Spain, Norway and a few others are arguably worse than the U.K. - which is what OP is describing.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 10:00 PM
6

Noooooo, you don’t understand! Being a mother is a full time job! Ignore the fact that the father is also an equal parent, with equal value to the child. The woman had to carry the child for 9 months - how can they be expected to work again! The father is the lesser parent who must break his back to provide for his selfish wife. Thankfully some women aren’t like this, but too many are.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 10:06 PM
11

Graduates earn more than non-graduates. Women graduate more then men. Therefore, women earn more than men. But … women don’t want that? Then why do they keep encouraging women to get degrees, when they fully intend on working part-time/semi-retiring once they have their first child? So much of social media is full of women in their 20s lamenting about not having a rich man. They wish they could stop working, like their mothers did. But that’s the price you pay for feminising the education system…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 10:01 PM
5

Women want equal pay. Men start earning less relative to women. Women start finding men ‘less economically attractive’. It’s like there’s no thinking ahead whatsoever. If women start earning more and doing the higher paid jobs, men will appear less economically attractive. Basic maths. You can’t have one without the other. Sure, some men still earn lots more than their partners. They’re the ones that are married. The outliers are the role reversed women that earn 5 times more than their husbands…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 09:40 PM
10

A woman telling men to do exactly what she says. No care about whether men want to change to fit her ‘ideals’. Keep getting more masculine, men. Women instinctively and naturally prefer this.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:50 PM
2

C’mon, TIME, publish the ‘Women Are Obsolete’ article. You believe in gender equality, right? That’s what feminism is, right? Because this article seems to suggest you support misandry and matriarchy, not gender equality. Unless …
/r/MensRights10/07/23 11:12 PM
102

But when it comes to salary, the man must earn more. Despite being the bumbling idiot.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 09:02 AM
11

It will be when all men are feminised. And believe me, the women will be having sex with the least feminised men.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 12:42 AM
3

Also completely ignoring the fact that women watch porn too. Maybe that’s contributing to their unrealistic expectations in men? Women won’t publicly say that watch porn. They’ll even lie in a survey. But they do. A lot.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 12:37 AM
2

What a post. I just want to say I appreciate how much time and effort you put into this. You hit every beat and note. Smashed it.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 12:29 AM
53

I wonder why there’s an identity crisis amongst young men? What could have caused this “crisis of masculinity”? I’d like authors of articles like this to admit decades of society prioritising women has done this. Women easily out number men at uni and have done so for decades. But we still need to have more scholarships for women in STEM, more female leaders in education, more female managers … It’s just a constant bombardment against men succeeding. There is no end goal or ‘happy number’ to mee…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 11:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter