TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Goldenwolf0101 Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by Goldenwolf0101 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

There's a figure of speech that goes, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder," which implies that beauty is subjective. Since you said beauty was objective, I was making a joke by inferring your name was B. Holder.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 01:47 PM
14

I agree with the findings, but how does that justify women being treated better? Is it because they perceive preferential treatment as equal treatment? Biggest non-sequitor ever.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 12:15 PM
3

What's your name? B. Holder?
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:50 AM
1

Committing suicide and killing your kid with you is the equivalent of king Solomon's decision to cut the baby in half.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:41 PM
-2

The vaccine doesn't stop the virus from entering your body and being passed to other people, but it does greatly reduce the chance of transmission - around 70% depending on the which vaccine and which stain of Covid. This is why people still need to be careful until everyone has the vaccine, but there are still people who are immunocompromised who can't have to vaccine. Think the vaccine as just another precaution to prevent people from getting sick. It's a very good permanent precaution, but is…
/r/MensRights19/07/21 12:24 AM
2

No worries.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 06:04 PM
3

Probably talking about the whole Covid conspiracy, including the validity of the vaccine. It has needlessly split people into groups of "for" or "against". I think the vaccine is a great thing and that it will help everyone "get back to normal", but a loud minority disagree.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 05:29 PM
5

I think they mean bring, not "being".
/r/MensRights18/07/21 05:21 PM
3

I totally agree that she was 100% allowed to have an abortion as she was not ready to be a parent and it was also making her ill. If one parent is not 100% certain about having a child, then the family should not have a child. This work both ways because it would negatively affect the child if any one parent was not able or willing to take care of a child. Both parents need to be prepared to have a child if they choose to have a child together. I also side with OP. The comment section seemed to …
/r/MensRights27/06/21 06:37 PM
1

Everybody recognises that the company name is "MAN" with the slogan "Consistently Efficient". The humour is displayed when people deliberately choose to read it as men being consistently efficient.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:52 PM
9

Yes. This has to be true for the pun to work. The pun is that men are consistently efficient, which would only work if you use the acronym as the noun "man". It's a play on words.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:04 PM
15

I think he was being hyperbolic for the sake of humour. Since many people in the media, including social media, see many male traits as negative; calling a man "consistently efficient", which is a positive trait by most standards, would probably be viewed as "wrong think" or "being against the narrative" (something like that). This may lead to said people above trying to get the slogan on the truck cancelled and the company sued. I don't know, man. I just smile and wave. Haha.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 05:13 PM
1

Austin is genetic. The brain is "wired" differently.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 08:11 PM
2

No worries.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 05:25 PM
2

I was talking about how the comments thread explained away women's crimes, but still left men responsible for their crimes, implying that they're more aggressive and violent. I was paraphrasing the comment threads' conclusion.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 03:02 PM
8

The first comment thread was just talking about how men commit more crime, but the "one" crime where females are the majority isn't actually women's fault and can be explained away. However, men are just violent and aggressive.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 08:24 PM
1

It's cool. Haha.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 04:52 PM
7

The source is on the last slide.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 01:58 AM
4

The source is on the last slide.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 01:58 AM
3

I don't think it would be different because she still had sex with an underage pupil. I don't agree that power Dynamics are in favour of the boy or that power dynamics are even relevant. I would like to understand the reasoning behind your viewpoint.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 01:02 AM
2

There are links to the study on the last slide. Many people have also posted links to the study in the comments. Hope this helps.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 03:46 AM
2

This sub isn't about sending people to prison. The only reason her case was included is because she got the same sentencing a man would've received. A prominent issue men's rights activists focus on is the treatment of men and women in the criminal justice system. People in this sub are happy that she received equal treatment under the law because it's an example of court focusing on the crime committed rather than the perpetrator's sex. If you ask anybody in this sub they will also Condemned a …
/r/MensRights06/03/21 09:48 PM
37

Since when did a woman being punished and sent to prison for killing her partner = resentment to women? Nobody is obsessing over a woman in prison. They are happy that she has faced the course of justice like anyone else would. Moreover, the fact that she got convicted then went for a retrial and got convicted again, which shows that she tried to appeal with a second trial but it didn't work. I don't understand why you're obsessing over the "woman" part. Everybody in this sub mainly cares that s…
/r/MensRights06/03/21 03:23 PM
2

I didn't explicitly or implicitly mention toxic masculinity; I was simply replying to the statement as it was presented. The statement just refers to men as a whole, so I agreed because of course you aren't toxic for just being a man. I think we are both on the same page about this. The only implication behind my comment was that people should be judged as individuals and not as a group, which I think is a moral judgement to make. Hopefully this clears things up.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 07:02 AM
5

Agreed. It's the biggest generalisation ever to assume half the population is toxic because of such an arbitrary characteristic, something that you can't control, something as trivial as gender.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 08:44 PM
4

"Men falling behind in education and career work - women most affected."
/r/MensRights06/02/21 02:21 AM
35

Couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 02:26 AM
1

I just checked out the subreddit. It's extremely toxic. They just bash men, but talk about how to get what they want out of relationship with them.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 02:04 AM
3

She should get life without parole.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 04:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter