| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | I'm hurt by people saying my circumcised penis is mutilated.The ones who hurt you are those who injured your body, not the ones calling out the baby cutters. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/25 06:19 PM |
| 5 | My rather lengthy response to a video about circumcision; a scientist's perspectivePunching a child in the face is harmful. Do you need a set of studies to explain why? Choking his neck is harmful. Cutting off his nipples is harmful. Cutting off the tip of his tongue is harmful. Cutting off the prepuce of his penis is harmful. It severs nerves, blood vessels, amputates flesh, and leaves a permanent scar. Most compelling evidence in my mind opposing the statements made by OP is the work of Morris et al. (2022) which found no statistically significant correlation between circumc… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/25 01:14 PM |
| 9 | Mozambique: DOGE cuts €9.5M male circumcision programmePEPFAR was launched during G W Bush in 2003. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/25 11:12 PM |
| 1 | To cut or not to cutHe wants to cut his boy's penis to last longer in bed? In other words, he knows it will reduce his sensitivity and thinks it's his right to impose that on his child. The reason why women protest against FGM is that it's intended to remove sexual pleasure. Your husband proves that male circumcision is done for the same reason. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/25 11:00 AM |
| 2 | To cut or not to cutYou thanked them because you assumed that not being cut would have caused you insecurity. Circumcised guys deceive themselves imagining the mental anguish felt by intact boys. I'm the intact father of an intact teenager. We have no idea what you guys are so afraid of. Stop blaming pressure from peers. You torment kids with bodies different from yours. Either through insult or with a knife. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/25 10:59 AM |
| 2 | To cut or not to cutChildren care about injuries to their bodies. You say bowing to peer pressure takes priority over bodily injury. Most parents disagree. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/25 04:06 AM |
| 8 | To cut or not to cutWhat a terrible take. Of all the reasons to cut a child's genitals, the fear of peer pressure is the most cowardly. If you make this argument, you are agreeing with the bullies, you are saying that the insults are deserved. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/25 07:59 PM |
| – | Many women and men on this sub are willfully ignorant about male genital mutilationTo those who don't understand why cutting children is "a big deal": if someone with a knife were to tie down my son and cut off a piece of his body, that would be violent criminal assault. I'd be legally justified in shooting such an attacker to protect my son. But you say it's no big deal as long as he only cuts his penis? The only reason people think cutting children's genitals is trivial is because of their cultural conditioning. Any observer from outside a genital cutting culture is horrifie… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/11/24 02:05 AM |
| 3 | Many women and men on this sub are willfully ignorant about male genital mutilationThe most ardent defenders of FGM are the women who practice it. https://nation.africa/kenya/news/gender/dr-tatu-kamau-give-adult-women-choice-of-getting-circumcised-4063934#google_vignette | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/11/24 08:09 PM |
| 15 | Many women and men on this sub are willfully ignorant about male genital mutilationAccepting all your points about there being no difference between cut and intact men's sexual satisfaction, that is an argument against continuing the practice of cutting children's genitals. It's strange that anyone thinks that cutting children with a knife for no reason is not a big deal. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/11/24 07:51 PM |
| 5 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernCircumcisions are rarely done on boys to correct a condition that poses a health hazard. It's done for cultural and religious reasons. If no disease is present, then cutting off a portion of a healthy penis does nothing but inflict an injury to the organ. It appears that men circumcised at birth have trouble understanding that a normal, unaltered penis is a valued part of most male bodies in the world. All the claims of benefits come from cultures invested in the sunk cost of millions of needles… | /r/MensRights | 21/10/24 09:35 PM |
| 5 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernYou just pointed out the flaw in your own argument when you brought up female genital cutting. You support a law protecting girls from having their genitals cut for cultural reasons. Most boys are cut for reasons having nothing to do with improving their health. Why do they not deserve equal protection? | /r/MensRights | 21/10/24 07:34 PM |
| 6 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernYou also mentioned circumcision. There's no law that requires it. The fact that the law permits a baby boy to be cut by his parents is the problem. The fair comparison would be a law that denies a woman's right to decide about her own body by giving her parents the authority on whether she must bear a child. The law says it's the parents choice for a male's body, not the man himself. If you think that law is fair, then you should also say a woman must defer to her parents' choice. You say parent… | /r/MensRights | 21/10/24 05:34 PM |
| 2 | Do you believe circumcision is harming males?If you are not an advocate for circumcision, what is keeping you from stating opposition against unnecessary genital surgery for male children simply due to the right of equal protection? "For phimosis in females, the surgical treatment is an incision to expose the clitoris. That’s not any type of FGM, it’s actually the opposite of it." Type 1: This is the partial or total removal of the clitoral glans, and/or the prepuce/clitoral hood. Type 4: pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauteriz… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/24 08:07 PM |
| 4 | Do you believe circumcision is harming males?You're playing semantics. If you performed any of these surgeries on a healthy girl, they fit the WHO definition of FGM. Performing an unnecessary surgery on a healthy boy is no less a violation. To argue otherwise is just sexism and cultural bias, in other words, the fallacy of an appeal to tradition. Types of FGM Female genital mutilation is classified into 4 major types: Type 1: This is the partial or total removal of the clitoral glans (the external and visible part of the clitoris, which is… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/24 07:44 PM |
| 5 | Do you believe circumcision is harming males?There are many types of surgeries for female genitals. Clitoral phimosis in females occurs just as penile phimosis in males. https://youtu.be/DewzgbJ-enw?si=xseNqLT8Z4SVfSmx&t=512 https://www.jogc.com/article/S1701-2163(16)35243-4/pdf Labial adhesions https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/953412-treatment?form=fpf Even the most severe form of FGM has a valid medical purpose. https://www.saintlukeskc.org/health-library/understanding-vulvectomy# Vulvar cancer is twice as common as penile cancer. … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/24 06:50 PM |
| 9 | What kind of downsides have you guys experienced from being circumcised?You don't understand why it's wrong to tamper with a child's genitals? If you are male, you can do without your nipples. So what's wrong with cutting them off babies? Cutting a child's penis is just as wrong as if you cut off his nipples. The only reason you don't see the problem is that you don't remember it happening. If they did it to you at 10, you'd know they injured you and you'd know it was wrong. So is it OK to do when you're 5? How about 1? They do it to babies because that's the only w… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/24 09:54 AM |
| 3 | My brother in law was forced to get a circumcision at age 17 by his mother. The women I speak to don't see this as sexual abuse. His penis was damaged and he still is humiliated to this day.Does not add up. The Philippines has a higher circ rate than the U.S. Your explanation that he was cut in the U.S. to fit in makes no sense. If they cared about him fitting in, he'd have been cut already. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 04:27 PM |
| 12 | My brother in law was forced to get a circumcision at age 17 by his mother. The women I speak to don't see this as sexual abuse. His penis was damaged and he still is humiliated to this day.Does not add up. The Philippines has a higher circ rate than the U.S. Your explanation that he was cut in the U.S. to fit in makes no sense. If they cared about him fitting in, he'd have been cut already. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 04:26 PM |
| 8 | I am a mother to be in three weeks to a baby boy, and I'm wondering, what is your take on circumcision as a circumcised/uncircumcised man?Bodily integrity: the inviolability of the physical body.The personal autonomy, self-ownership, and self-determination of human beings over their own bodies. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/23 12:20 PM |
| 55 | I am a mother to be in three weeks to a baby boy, and I'm wondering, what is your take on circumcision as a circumcised/uncircumcised man?if a woman, or whoever he chooses to have sex with, is weirded out by him having foreskin I'm not here to body shame, Yet your main argument in favor of cutting your son is to please a body shamer. Rejecting your child's penis to make the bullies happy is not good parenting. You are saying your son's bodily integrity matters less to you than the opinion of some shallow woman. You fear their judgment enough that you'd harm your own child. Madness. Accept him the way he is and teach him to be stro… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/23 12:08 PM |
| 9 | Boys and girls alike - essay about MGM and FGM from medical ethics researcherThe writer of the article is pointing out the common mistake of this false comparison. Read the whole article. Unfortunately, there’s a problem with these claims. Almost every one of them is untrue, or severely misleading. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/23 01:53 AM |
| 187 | Does circumcision really help decrease the possibly of getting AIDS?According to the NIH, in the Uganda study, out of 4996 men, 22 circumcised men tested positive versus 45 uncircumcised. That's how they claim their 50-60% relative risk reduction. Meanwhile, the number of adverse events (botched circumcision) was 178 men out of the 2474 who were cut. They never mention that part. The number of men whose penises were damaged by their circumcision and therefore were curtailed from sexual activity exceeds the difference. So yes, circumcision will reduce your chance… | /r/MensRights | 13/07/23 06:25 PM |
| 1 | Mayor branded racist resigns amid circumcision rowYou are saying it's justified to cut a woman's genitals only when there is a medical need. At the same time you are saying it's harmless to cut a male's genitals whether needed or not. Your hypocrisy is plain for everyone to see. Thanks for making that clear. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/23 09:25 PM |
| 11 | Family livid over decision to appeal RM3.1mil award in botched circumcision caseMost Muslim men get circumcised over age 7, with no medical need. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/22 11:06 AM |
| 15 | The state of circumcisions in Norwaylower STD rates The claim is not only baseless, but an outright lie. Please explain why the U.S. rates of STD are astronomically higher than places that don't circumcise. And if you say that the cause is other factors, you only prove that circumcision is irrelevant. https://onlinedoctor.superdrug.com/std-us-eu/ https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.404 "Interestingly, circumcised men had a two-fold increased risk of these high-risk HPV infections." People beat their children bec… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/22 09:25 AM |
| 3 | I don't understand the circumcision debateWhat bullshit??? I never said male circumcision has no medical purpose. It's you who claimed there is never a purpose to cutting girls. Which is plain disinformation. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/22 02:27 PM |
| 6 | I don't understand the circumcision debateIn other words, you admit you made a false assertion and have no argument. Thank you. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/22 02:13 PM |
| 4 | I don't understand the circumcision debateDo you not understand there are clear medical benefits to circumcision while there are none for cutting a girls genitals? Your claim is demonstrably false and I doubt you even cared to verify it. What are you afraid of by making this ridiculous assertion? Any body part can be afflicted by problems that need medical intervention and female genitals are obviously no exception. True cases of medical need for male circumcision are rare. There are just as many, if not more cases where defects or dise… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/22 01:51 PM |
| 18 | I don't understand the circumcision debateDo you understand why there's a law against cutting a baby girl's genitals? Then you understand. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/22 04:30 PM |
| 7 | It's called Male genital mutilation.To all the assholes out there comparing it to FGM, watch a video. They aren’t even close. Imagine if you were 5 years old and without anesthesia, they skinned your whole cock. Not even close? What makes you think that boys getting their genitals cut in tribal settings is any less horrific? Traditional Circumcision and Initiation into Manhood | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 11:18 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter