Gondlerap Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	This was the U.K. governments response to the petition to make it so women could be charged with rape against males and they lied through all of it! (This is a right there not letting us have, there not letting us in the U.K. be able to get our women rapists CHARGED WITH RApe) This isn't contrarianism. I stand by my point that your misunderstanding of words has led you to demand that the meanings be changed to suit your own ignorance. I'm glad that demonstrating that ignorance to people more qualified than you gives you some relief. Good luck out there my friend.	/r/MensRights	31/10/20 12:46 PM
0	This was the U.K. governments response to the petition to make it so women could be charged with rape against males and they lied through all of it! (This is a right there not letting us have, there not letting us in the U.K. be able to get our women rapists CHARGED WITH RApe) That is not what your definition was. Sex without consent' is so unclear i guess, you should probably head back to elementary school if thats the case. Then you literally went and found one of the legal definitions of rape (I'm assuming US Federal), that is inherently more comprehensive than your babble. And you've somehow come back to arguing against your own point. The definition you have given is relatively similar to the definition in England and Wales, although in E&W it can only be the pen…	/r/MensRights	28/10/20 09:36 AM
1	This was the U.K. governments response to the petition to make it so women could be charged with rape against males and they lied through all of it! (This is a right there not letting us have, there not letting us in the U.K. be able to get our women rapists CHARGED WITH RApe) Again - what is sex? Oral sex? Anal sex? vaginal sex? Insertion of foreign objects in the vagina, mouth, anus? Insertion of body parts? Touching? Clitoral stimulation? Forced penetration of a foreign object? When you are drafting laws, clarity is necessary.	/r/MensRights	27/10/20 10:14 AM
1	This was the U.K. governments response to the petition to make it so women could be charged with rape against males and they lied through all of it! (This is a right there not letting us have, there not letting us in the U.K. be able to get our women rapists CHARGED WITH RApe) Much clearer than anything you've come up with.	/r/MensRights	27/10/20 10:06 AM
-5	This was the U.K. governments response to the petition to make it so women could be charged with rape against males and they lied through all of it! (This is a right there not letting us have, there not letting us in the U.K. be able to get our women rapists CHARGED WITH RApe) Okay, my comment was wrongly worded, only people with a penis can rape, if that helps you out. Are you going to tell a rape victim that was violated by a foreign object that they weren't really raped? They were not raped under English Law, Sexual Offences Act 2003, s.2(1): A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina or anus of another person (B) with a part of his body or anything else, (b)the penetration is sexual, (c)B does not consent to the penetration, and …	/r/MensRights	25/10/20 02:16 PM
-5	This was the U.K. governments response to the petition to make it so women could be charged with rape against males and they lied through all of it! (This is a right there not letting us have, there not letting us in the U.K. be able to get our women rapists CHARGED WITH RApe) Because you don't understand the definition of rape. This is the definition of rape, and to make things simpler, the definition you've been told is having sex without consent. So now you think "that must include all sex without consent" and then get confused when there is an element of sex that is not included in the definition. Women can't rape, they can do other things, that are exactly the same as rape in all categories, except only one of the terms has gained social usage (albeit wrongly).	/r/MensRights	25/10/20 12:41 PM
5	This was the U.K. governments response to the petition to make it so women could be charged with rape against males and they lied through all of it! (This is a right there not letting us have, there not letting us in the U.K. be able to get our women rapists CHARGED WITH RApe) Why would they need to? There are other offences that cover the same ground.	/r/MensRights	25/10/20 12:37 PM
-6	This was the U.K. governments response to the petition to make it so women could be charged with rape against males and they lied through all of it! (This is a right there not letting us have, there not letting us in the U.K. be able to get our women rapists CHARGED WITH RApe) Your problem there is you need to define sex. The legislation does it quite comprehensively already.	/r/MensRights	25/10/20 12:36 PM
1	Apparently, women can’t be rapists It does, the definition needs both the actus reus and the mens rea. So the first bit does encompass all sex, then the second bit is that it is done without the reasonable belief of consent, they should be read together.	/r/MensRights	04/04/20 08:00 AM
1	Apparently, women can’t be rapists No, most people have sex with a reasonable belief that the other party is consenting.	/r/MensRights	04/04/20 06:58 AM
59	Apparently being a white male is major points against your resume. My friend is now going to sue It was the Governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey. The vast majority of articles discussed his history and suitability for the role, but there were a couple of buzzfeed-type articles that found their way into reputable publications.	/r/MensRights	29/12/19 12:01 AM
3	Royal Guard Don't Give A Fuck! Out of interest, why don’t you ever intend to visit London?	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/05/19 10:13 AM
1	Two-tiered justice system in the UK- Men are sent to prison for being homeless and asking for food, while women are exempt from many crimes, including assault and theft FYI - the Justice Secretary isn't the highest ranking Judge in the UK, he is just the Cabinet official in Charge of the Ministry of Justice, so this is a government policy - and one that can easily be reversed by a new government.	/r/MensRights	23/05/19 08:08 PM
1	I've been feeling quite upset over the whole controversy with Alabama and Georgia, was hoping I could get some feedback here Miscommunication - If you say bodily autonomy trumps everything, then at any stage of a woman's pregnancy she can have an abortion. It is a very rare occurrence, but presumably you would be against a very late term abortion (assuming the foetus isn't capable of being delivered)? If you are okay with a woman having that right - fine, that makes sense given your earlier statement. If you're against it, why does the woman's bodily autonomy not trump all else anymore?	/r/MensRights	16/05/19 02:22 PM
1	I've been feeling quite upset over the whole controversy with Alabama and Georgia, was hoping I could get some feedback here Of course - but if you say bodily autonomy trumps all else, and don't want to allow late term abortions - there has to be an exception to your argument - so what is the exception?	/r/MensRights	16/05/19 01:59 PM
1	I've been feeling quite upset over the whole controversy with Alabama and Georgia, was hoping I could get some feedback here The human right to bodily autonomy trumps all other concerns. The only problem with that argument - is how do you deal with a woman who is close to labour wanting an abortion? If bodily autonomy trumps everything - she should be able to terminate that pregnancy at any stage. Not generally an accepted view.	/r/MensRights	16/05/19 01:05 PM