TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Good_Roll Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by Good_Roll on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You are playing a dangerous game here. And the only thing more dangerous than that is doing so without realizing it, and I dont think you fully understand that danger.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:54 AM
1

They can though. That's a lot of power to be putting in the hands of the government. This is a bit too close to eugenics for my liking. It's arguably already there.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:07 AM
4

yes letting the government decide who can reproduce is a great idea and will have no unintended effects whatsoever! This cannot possibly go wrong!
/r/MensRights17/06/26 04:25 PM
1

Zero self awareness over here.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 10:50 PM
1

Don't fixate on the taxes part, you can replace taxes with whatever part of the criminal code you want. The point is that the government is in the business of telling you what you can do with your body.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 10:47 PM
1

Yes I agree completely. What i object to is the lack of specificity in your prior arguments. I know this is veering close to semantic nitpicking territory but I think I made my thoughts pretty clear in the last comment why those specifics are still important to get right.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 10:45 PM
1

I don't really disagree with any of that. So let's use that standard: If you've got a woman who's 8.5 months pregnant and wants an abortion, "your body my choice" is a lot stronger of an argument from those lawmakers. Because none of us want to kill actual babies, right? So the part that is vile is really just where they draw the line, not that they're drawing a line. Because that's the thing that 99% of us agree on, aborting a 8.9999 month old fetus is murder, therefore there needs to be a line…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:31 PM
1

It stood because the outcomes were good not because it was a good legal argument. It was inevitable that it would eventually be overturned as soon as there was a court that wasn't in favor of those outcomes, which is why the decision was so damaging: it lulled us into a false sense of safety. We should have been spending those 50 so years pushing for national legislation to actually decide on a standard here but instead we rested on our laurels thinking we'd won and all of the political will and…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:19 PM
1

No that's not the point, the point is that the government will make a choice about your body if you refuse to pay them. They will choose to put your body in a cage. Because that's what government does, it makes choices about our bodies.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:17 PM
1

If all of our genders were reversed we'd be calling you a pick me right about now Your arguments fall apart if you actually look at the substance of the counterarguments anyway, pretty sure nobody here wants to hold women back. We want to stop giving them preferential treatment.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:25 AM
0

Well yeah, thats how government works. Don't want to pay your taxes? Your body my choice and my choice is to put your body in a cage now. Don't want to fight our wars? Your body my choice and my choice is to draft your body onto the front lines.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:23 AM
1

Roe v wade is a terribly decision that created temporarily favorable outcomes. It could never stand long term and the lack of proper jurisprudence has probably set back the movement by decades.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:21 AM
2

Youre either killing a baby or you arent. If youre killing a baby, it is entirely reasonable for the government to want to prevent that. That isnt vile, thats just what government does to further public policy goals. You can disagree with that classification all you want, I certainly do, the idea that a fetus a few weeks old is a person is totally ridiculous. But if your worldview treats that fetus as a person, your only moral option is to stop people from trying to kill it.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:17 AM
3

If you thought that something was murder you would probably want the state to punish it. I really dont understand why so many people on the pro choice side cant see that. You dont have to agree with the underlying premise to find the response reasonable given that those people do believe in that premise. Personally I think its totally retarded to believe that life begins at conception but it would be flat out evil to both believe that life begins at conception and not try to ban abortion.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:13 AM
1

That's a false equivalency. Most therapists being bad is a perfectly valid reason to not want to wade through a bunch of bad ones. Thinking that most people of a certain group are bad and letting that inform your interactions with members of that group is bad. See the difference? Most men won't benefit from just talking about their problems. If you want to learn specific techniques for solving specific problems a good therapist can be helpful but the internet trend of telling people "you're pret…
/r/MensRights06/05/26 07:10 PM
1

Partially yes. Good leadership requires sacrifice, often of the self. Women are not very good at doing that for people outside of their immediate family for reasons that should be obvious evolutionarily. Their absolute intolerance for physical risk to themselves is why female aggression is characterized by plausible deniability and subversion: classic example of teenage girls all pretending to be friends but constantly making underhanded comments and socially sabotaging rivals. Running a society…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 07:09 PM
1

Turned into? Don't lie, you just got here didn't you.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:58 AM
6

Yes, you walk out the door you entered Mr. brigader.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 06:15 PM
5

You're a new face, what made you feel compelled to comment here?
/r/MensRights14/03/26 06:14 PM
0

To whose death are you referring?
/r/MensRights14/03/26 06:13 PM
4

In practice it does though, because most two parent households at the income levels where they'd individually qualify for medicaid dont make enough to support the family on a single income yet with two incomes they make too much to qualify for medicaid. It's also way easier for a single mother to get aproved for any sort of benefits, just ask anybody working in a government benefits office. There's also all the NGOs chartered to help single mothers that are ultimately funded by government money.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 01:32 AM
1

Is that supposed to make mass importation of populations that historically will not integrate into the cultures of their host nations a good idea? Israel and Israeli interests are at the root of basically every single failed middle eastern nation building project the western world has conducted so maybe they should take in the refugees instead.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 04:46 PM
1

Okay if youre just going to keep shoehorning in terms you dont actually understand we're done here.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 02:39 AM
1

Nah ive seen the kids raised by other people that arent their parents, the ones where their parents played an active role in their lives and didnt just pass them off between daycare, nannies, and after school programs all turned out way better. A mother choosing to stay at home to raise her kids gives them a huge advantage. I really dont see the point in getting married except to have kids, maybe that somewhat ironically makes me more blackpilled than you but all the benefits you discussed could…
/r/MensRights03/03/26 10:07 PM
1

The Reality Check is that your father and grandfather lived in a different century Yes, one which was even harsher to men in divorce court. This idea that you just need to find a 'good mother' is the classic White Knight fallacy. It assumes that if you're a 'good man' and a 'good provider,' you’ll be protected. No, youre missing the mark here. It's not about self protection, it's simply because the point of a marriage is to raise kids. I would probably not marry somebody who makes as much money …
/r/MensRights03/03/26 11:45 AM
1

I dont think finances dont matter, i know finances dont matter. The only criteria i used when courting my wife was whether or not she'd be a good mother to my children and how well she supported me. It's been going well so far. My father and my grandfather did the same, and they both died while being happily married. My goal is to do the same and I have a wife with similar values. Ultimately you're describing a small subset of women. A very dangerous and covert group to be sure, so by all means …
/r/MensRights03/03/26 03:14 AM
2

If she’s bringing zero assets and no tangible value to the table other than her looks, you aren’t finding a partner—you’re adopting a dependent. Beauty is a depreciating asset; your hard-earned wealth shouldn't be the trade-off for a temporary aesthetic. Dependents, but that's traditionally the goal of marriage. You get married to provide the proper structure within which to raise well adjusted and prosperous kids. Looking at potential mothers of your children from a strictly financial lens is a…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:26 PM
39

It's pretty easy to be on the right side of things when you dont have any skin in the game.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 07:07 PM
27

And because we're physically stronger we're expected to not fight back, so in reality it doesnt matter how strong we are if we have to act like a punching bag.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 03:23 AM
2

The difference here is that western society has given an honest effort to address all of those different group's problems with the exception of ours, so your words are going to fall on mostly deaf ears with an equivalency like that. There's an important distinction to be made between considering most women bad people and recognizing that most women arent bad people but are still mostly part of the problem. That doesnt mean we should be petty or hateful, but we also shouldnt be implicitly giving …
/r/MensRights01/03/26 03:20 AM
2

Now don't think Government really cares that much more about women Yes they do, just not as independent humans more like critical resources for ensuring the survival of the society that government was founded to protect. Governments care as much about women as they care about maintaining their territorial holdings, which is to say: a lot. Most of the patriarchal structures feminists have traditionally fought are ways that society and governments have tried to protect women, structures that are d…
/r/MensRights28/02/26 03:14 PM
1

I see where you're coming from here but the problem is that women are inherently valued by society because their reproductive capabilities are scarce while men have only conditional, competitive value because our reproductive capabilities are mostly redundant. Society can maintain birthrates with like 90% of us dead if they had to, so it takes only a very small percentage of scabs to break your strike. The value men provide to society is from our ability to prioritize things other than our own p…
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:58 PM
1

They're not gonna say it but it's because of your Muslim immigrants.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:50 PM
2

How about this: most women have some amount of toxic beliefs and expectations of men? People are in part products of their environment and our environment is pretty hostile to men
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:46 PM
2

To be fair most of the women on reddit say that too but about men, even the ones that claim (or really do) hate all men usually acknowledge that there are some men who are good by their standards, and they use the same logic to justify treating all men like shit. Im sure youve all heard their silly little analogies about poison MMs and such.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:42 PM
1

This outta be good
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:38 PM
1

Did you really just make that comment to segue into your little soapbox rant about guns in the US? How quaint.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:28 PM
1

It's one of the most important gender roles, it's the entire bedrock upon which society is founded and is why women are expected to defer to men on many things in a healthy society. It is from this that your authority as a husband and father is derived. Just because our society is rotting from the inside and no longer recognizes this fact doesnt make it any less true. It is certainly an understandable choice to reject this role in current society since society has no right to ask it of you absen…
/r/MensRights21/02/26 08:47 PM
1

I already like him, you dont have to convince me.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 08:17 PM
1

Which would be fair if the other end of the bargain was kept. You don't actually want to live in a society that doesnt believe this even if you think you do.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 08:16 PM
1

I got married, graduated, and attended interviews all in the same suit. It might've cost far more than any outfit my wife owns but it fits me like a glove, is precisely constructed to suit my exact preferences, and has given me more value in the end than I spent on it. At this rate I'll be buried in it too.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 08:06 PM
2

The flipside of this is that for women having a family is a choice but for men it's an opportunity, and an increasingly rare one at that. In the US and most of the western world women have easy access to every form of contraceptive, including non-hormonal ones, and can get pill based abortions in just about every state and the vast, vast majority of them are at least pro choice enough to not see any issue with terminating a sub 10 week fetus which is plenty of time to find out youre pregnant. In…
/r/MensRights21/02/26 08:01 PM
2

It's funny because the opposite is usually true, that is, when a son is antisocial and destructive it's usually because the father isnt present enough in his life. If anything a feminized son is a product of the society he is raised in which rewards femininity and punishes masculinity. That's a really strong influence and incentive to overcome as a father.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 07:54 PM
1

Best answer ITT
/r/MensRights21/02/26 07:51 PM
0

You cant possibly be misunderstanding this badly in good faith.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 07:48 PM
2

You dont like it when people presume that other people will move their own things? Youve lost the plot.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 07:47 PM
1

Not all women can give birth either yet raising the next generation is clearly an unconditional benefit of being a woman
/r/MensRights21/02/26 07:45 PM
3

Everybody knows that women are important, it's beyond obvious. They have the most important job in society and the most essential one for our species's survival. The top comment ITT literally mentions this. It does not appear to be obvious to plenty of women that men are important though, and when intersexual relations are studied a lot of women seem to be taking men forgranted. Comments you might see on social media seem to confirm this
/r/MensRights15/02/26 08:29 PM
5

Its not actually a medical operation though, it serves no valid medical purpose. And not all rape is done for sexual pleasure. The humiliation aspect doesnt have to be a sexual perversion. I remember reading a news story of some college athletes who were convicted of rape for forcibly penetrating a new student in the locker room with a broom handle or something as a form of hazing, I dont get the impression those guys were getting sexual pleasure from that act. Even if you dont believe this, ima…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:54 PM
4

So rape for the purpose of humiliation and not sexual gratification isnt sexual assault? How are we defining sexual then?
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:39 PM
1

If the semantics matter then let's get into the details instead of deflecting. What would you say is the difference between sexual assault and simple assault+battery? If my reading of your implication is correct, youd argue that it is the deriving of sexual pleasure from the assault that makes the difference. So in that case if you forcibly penetrate somebody with an object but not for the purpose of your own pleasure, is that not sexual assault? Let's also get into the details here: it might be…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 09:35 PM
6

To be fair if you rape someone with an object as a form of humiliation and not sexual gratification it's still sexual assault. Most rape isnt about pleasure anyway.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 09:31 PM
1

The whole "women are after 20% of men" just isn't true, factually. It really seems like you're continuing to reframe "most women" as "all women". Those numbers come from the OkCupid study where the average woman ranked 80% of the male profiles shown as unattractive so there's at least a kernel of truth here. Every time data is published from sites like this it does seem to follow this general trend. Is there a selection bias at play here? Probably, men are overrepresented on online dating sites …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 03:03 AM
1

Sorry let me clarify: what I mean to ask is what are your goals when courting a man and how do those activities support those goals?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 02:33 PM
2

But how does that meaningfully contradict the argument "women like X Y Z so if I increase those qualities I will be better able to find a good partner"? I didnt get the impression women in this case means every single woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 02:30 PM
1

Okay, care to elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 02:16 PM
3

Does it though or is it simply making observations about groups and not individuals? A claim about group preference trends is not refuted by saying "i am a part of that group and I disagree with that trend"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 02:10 PM
1

How is any of that considered courting to you though? The specific word he used isnt important, it's just an implication that part of courting somebody means you want them to view you as impressive. I also didnt get the impression anyone was giving you advice specifically, more of a critique of what you consider courting and general advice for the readers of what courting should look like in their opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 01:58 PM
0

To fuck them sure, not to see any kind of future with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 01:56 PM
2

Yes that's a problem.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:21 AM
6

People dont usually notice subtle things that dont affect them. I started noticing it a lot when I started dating my wife but i dont think I'd ever noticed it before then. Still, it's very normal to look at people's bodies in the gym. Most people look their best, everybody has a pump and if its not cold we're all wearing minimal clothing. Everyone's there to improve themselves so those bodies are a representation of their hard work and it's normal to appreciate that about people of both sexes; m…
/r/MensRights27/01/26 11:04 PM
1

Poe's law my guy, the only real giveaway is that a real feminist would have insulted us all a lot more than that
/r/MensRights22/01/26 12:47 AM
3

This is a joke right
/r/MensRights21/01/26 11:33 AM
2

The only one ignoring things is you guys, you all seem very intent on not defining fascism or showing how any of this administration's actions fit that definition. As for my personal opinions im afraid my dissatisfaction comes from the opposite direction as yours. I'd like to see the administration actually follow through on its promises but I dont see that happening anytime soon.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 01:26 AM
2

I'm still not hearing a definition for fascism and how this administration qualifies. Anyone else in the audience want to take a crack at it?
/r/MensRights08/01/26 12:29 AM
6

In that case why dont you refer to that definition to show how the current administration is fascistic? That word is one of the most misused political terms of this era.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 10:11 PM
4

No it's not the same and the only reason why it appears that way is because the right is largely reactionary in nature while the left is theory based. Just look at what intellectual aspirants on each side do, the leftists read theory and engage in purity spiraling with each other while the rightists "own liberals" in bloodsport style debates. The right engages in identity politics as a counter-reaction to leftist identitarianism, and they arent very good at it otherwise there'd be an actually in…
/r/MensRights06/01/26 10:09 PM
14

Thats a great line
/r/MensRights06/01/26 09:58 PM
6

Because nobody becomes influential in a vaccuum, there is no pipeline to becoming a politically influential figure on the left that does not greatly disincentivize the advancement of men like this. "Show me the incentive and ill show you the outcome". The right is really eating the left's lunch on this one.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 09:56 PM
39

Yeah i dont think so. The left has been just as willing as the right to use violence to implement their ideas and attack perceived threats. This has been true throughout history. Some of the most violent regimes have been leftist ones, the USSR being the obvious example.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 09:48 PM
5

It's very telling that theyll make a joke about gender crime statistics but not racial crime statistics.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 01:08 AM
1

It is a men's issue but not in the way they think. Fatherless men are by and large the people committing the violence and our society has created an incentive structure that has greatly increased fatherless households.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 06:08 AM
3

Construction, as a society we often fixate on verbal intelligence and ignore spatial intelligence so it's entirely possible that you'd have an aptitude for that kind of work and dont realize it. Plus "stupid" people often have to work harder so they develop stronger work ethics, which is good in a job like construction where there's not many clever ways to be more productive with less effort and you just gotta put the work in.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 09:15 PM
0

Female flaggers are usually butch lesbians anyway
/r/MensRights22/11/25 09:10 PM
1

Are you generalizing or speaking in absolutes? Because this isn't inevitable. My wife has a higher sex drive than I do and we're not some crazy unheard of outlier. I see the opposite in a lot of my younger, single friends. Their female peers are hyper sexual while they want more stable relationships.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 09:33 PM
3

if you can replace men with black people and it sounds racist, it's probably sexist.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 01:52 PM
1

There's a biological instinct for men to be more open towards women than other men. Doesnt mean that women wont prefer a man who projects strength(and being vulnerable around women indeed undermines this). Encouraging male friends to be vulnerable around each other is a good thing, though i wouldnt exactly say that not doing so makes you a bad friend, certainly not "horrible". There's no need to be so defensive, jumping to conclusions and throwing unfounded acusations helps no one.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:29 PM
1

Wow you have good friends, guess you picked them well.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:00 PM
6

Many men do feel more comfortable confiding in women, what gave you the impression otherwise?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:52 AM
6

You can avoid that by sticking to the topics he is an actual expert on.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 06:21 AM
3

Right, it's more about the neighborhood and it's access to infrastructure. Surely the urban/rural divide can explain some of the differences, but we can't ignore the effects of historical Jim Crowe laws.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/20 09:00 PM
5

Be careful since that's a flawed example, even adjusted for poverty black crime is still higher. The difference is that poverty in black communities comes with less effective policing and fewer opportunities than poverty in white communities. Also there tends to be more generational history in white areas which brings greater stability since, y'know, white people have been free for longer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/20 08:33 PM
1

All this talk about school shootings when that accounts for only a tiny sliver of one percent of all murders, sounds like an argument to emotions. Tread carefully, facts and logic don't matter in this arena.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 05:44 AM
10

Sure she does, for the same reason I have to respect hers. There's definitely some inequalities when it comes to divorce court though, I'll give you that. We can't fight against the US govt. Not with that attitude we can't.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 10:14 PM
20

If you feel you want a family and kids and stuff and must get married, then understand and accept what you are getting into. Pick one. It's totally possible to be married and not subservient to your wife. You just have to have boundaries and pick your partner carefully.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:08 PM
1

Wikipedia has very stringent sourcing requirements, so it's only natural that it would reflect the establishment narratives since that's what most sources are going to say.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 12:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter