TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GordonColeSaysWHAT Archive

View 2 posts and 134 comments by GordonColeSaysWHAT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Stop trying to smear anyone who speaks up about problems facing men or criticises feminism.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 09:33 PM
1

I literally got chastised the other day for complaining that an article about domestic abuse victims suffering lockdown didn't mention men once. I was told it wasn't the right place to complain, that I was somehow derailing the conversation by requesting men be included, and so on. It was shocking that the BBC and Guardian would exclude men like this, but worse that the feminists came in and played the victim when I complained. https://imgur.com/a/l2OJ9wS
/r/MensRights23/08/20 08:51 PM
2

I can read comments
/r/MensRights20/08/20 08:15 PM
1

I see a lot of blue. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio#/media/File%3ASex_ratio_total_population_per_country_smooth.png
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/20 08:52 AM
2

How come you completely ignored my other comment and the arguments and questions it contained? Divide 13.8% by zero % and get back to me What? I'm comparing how total discrimination against black people would affect a white person's chance of getting the job, to illustrate the difference between a privilege granted to someone, and a disadvantage placed upon someone else due to discrimination. Well, certainly no imbalance there. Uh no, there wasn't any imbalance. White people were indigenous to m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/20 07:42 AM
2

As a follow up to my last comment, consider the following example. Let's say there are 100 people applying for 10 jobs. 85 are white, 15 are black. They all are equally suitable for the job. The hirer hates black people and will never hire them. That gives the 85 white candidates a 13.8% chance of getting a job. The black people have a 0% chance. If the discrimination is ended, and the hirer is replaced by someone without bias, the white candidates have an 11.6% chance of getting a job. The blac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/20 12:54 AM
2

I'm honestly curious as to what your issue is with recognising discrimination towards black people and seeing the disadvantages they face, opposed to believing I have white privilege? You say, "this is semantics". Then why do you fight it so hard? Do you not understand the idea that privileges are different to rights? Slavery still exists in the world. Am I privileged to not be a slave? Fuck no! Nobody should ever be a slave. If there's a particular way that people should be treated, and a way t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/20 12:08 AM
1

It's more about the concept of a privilege in the first place. It's not intended to be automatic or guaranteed. It's a special elevation above the standard. A white person being treated fairly during the hiring process isn't a privilege. It's the way the system is supposed to work for everyone, regardless of race. The black person being unfairly treated by some employers is a disadvantage. Being given a parking permit that allows you to park anywhere, for no particular reason, is a privilege. It…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/20 10:59 AM
1

It is very strange how people will spend so much time arguing with white people to try and get them to acknowledge their "privilege", when instead, they could be discussing what disadvantages exist for minorities, and how to end those. They know people get defensive about it. They know lots of people will shut off when they hear it. They know there's a perfectly reasonable alternative term, that is much more accurate. They are harming their cause. It's similar to how feminists will spend a lot o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/20 10:45 AM
1

Holy shit, you're a psychopath.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 09:31 PM
1

The UN is a big organisation. It's not like this is stopping world hunger being solved. It's also pretty reasonable. If a load of terms were female gendered by default, you'd find it pretty annoying too.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 09:28 PM
13

Rape, sexual assault and harassment are not "female related issues" - they're human issues. Men are human. Deal with it 😎
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:21 PM
10

The fact that so called "feminists" have to even debate whether it's acceptable to call an entire gender "trash", is one of the reasons I'm not a feminist. It's also interesting that there's comments displaying the idea of "if you're a feminist you have to think about gender in the way I, a woman, tells you to". This directly contradicts the claim that feminism is "just" the idea that men and women are equal. They always attempt to start with that, but then you're only considered a feminist if y…
/r/MensRights25/04/20 03:01 PM
1

In fairness, the picture is of a girl in a third world country, where female education may already be pretty lacking in comparison to male education. Hard to say what point the article is trying to make without reading it.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 02:47 PM
1

I read the MSN link, and it seems perfectly normal and well written. The judge's sentence seems quite appropriate for a 15 year old with serious mental health issues. I looked at the second link, and it seemed to be the same text as the first. This suggests both sites just got the story from a news wire. There are services that create a centralised repository of news for its members, which enables news outlets to increase the scope and quality of their coverage. Edit: It seems just like MSN has …
/r/MensRights20/04/20 03:18 AM
1

Tigers aren’t people. Should you torture them? No. Let them starve? So you agree with making certain things illegal, even if they restrict your freedoms. No. Until Joe’s money was affected it seemed like his Zoo was run fairly well and had decent living conditions for the tigers. He was using the cubs for a few months for play/photo ops, then the tigers became an unnecessary feeding expense. He had to keep breeding to get more and more cubs, and there isn't enough legitimate space in the US for …
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:55 PM
2

WE BREED HUMANS FOR A LIFE OF CAPTIVITY! It’s 2020, there’s no wild. Humans are supposed to be in the woods running for miles on end capturing their pray and gathering fruits and vegetables. This is a strange ass take. Now we obviously have a difference of opinion, which is fine, but why change legislation, and my freedom to do what I want? I thought you were essentially in captivity and didn't have any freedom? Secondly, because we restrict people's freedom when it would negatively impinge on o…
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:41 PM
0

He was literally breeding animals for a life of captivity, just so he could make money off them for a couple of months while they're small enough. Then he sold them to God knows who, or killed them. I have no issue with that being illegal. He knew what he was doing was illegal, yet kept pushing it until he got sued to hell. It's his own fault. You honestly can't tell me you sympathise with Joe Exotic as some kind of rational guy who got pushed over the edge?!
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:34 PM
0

Joe was breeding tigers for a life of captivity just so he could profit off them when they were cubs. That's like saying you shouldn't advocate for heroin being illegal, because it affects drug dealers' ability to make a living. She hit him with lawsuits because he was engaging in copyright infringement.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:15 PM
0

What? Carol Baskins was in no way responsible for Joe Exotic hiring a hitman. Her lawsuits were justified and a result of idiotic behaviour by Joe.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:04 PM
4

Well, if she left him because $70 million wasn't enough, she's pretty silly as she has nothing now.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:18 PM
1

His money didn't run out. He had $70 million and a French Chateau. He also became an enemy of the Russian state, and was allegedly physical with her.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 02:43 PM
2

They're including anyone who receives sexual comments or unwanted advances. By their logic, I've been affected by sexual violence, but I think that is absurd. But they would include me in their stats. They do this to inflate the stats as much as possible, so their cause seems more necessary.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 04:02 AM
1

My opinion would be the same.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:56 PM
1

Neither should be "blamed". Society didn't shut down the second the first case arrived across the border. Advice, in the UK and Ireland anyway, was to just wash your hands thoroughly and not touch your face. Once the virus started to spread at a higher rate, restrictions were required to prevent exponential growth and hospitals exceeding their maximum capacity. It was a fast moving situation; one day it was considered fine to gather en masse, while the next day it wasn't. Trying to blame politic…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 02:27 AM
1

it's logic to think they allowed the march to obtain more votes. I'd say it's the opposite - they'd lose votes if people thought they allowed the march to go ahead purely because it was a feminist march. It's not like feminists enjoy dying, or being forced into lockdown for an extra month because they let the virus spread. Considering how many massive and financially important things also went ahead, and how the rest of Europe started lockdown around the same time, I'd say it's very likely just …
/r/MensRights31/03/20 01:29 PM
1

There were woman's day marches in the UK, sporting event, concerts, and shopping too. I went to a concert in Ireland on the 4th March, and there was no suggestion from the government or media that I shouldn't have gone.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 01:09 PM
1

For example yesterday we discovered that a closelly aligned to the goverment party news station, the ser, was preparing for the pandemic two weeks in advance The possibility of a pandemic wasn't exactly a secret. It's not surprising that an organisation would be planning. It would be more surprising if they weren't. Also, the news changed drastically after the 8th I mean, that happened in a lot of places. The Premier League got cancelled after the 8th in the UK. Same with the NBA season in the U…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 11:49 AM
1

The problem is that everybody suspects the only reason the football matches were not cancelled is because of the feminist parade. Really? Who exactly suspects this? Surely Real Madrid and Barcelona games are far more important and influential than a woman's day march? That's 140k expensive tickets, travel plans, local economy spending (tens of millions in revenue altogether) vs a free march. Shutting down a city centre for shopping would cause massive loss of revenue (and jobs). All of this is j…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 11:30 AM
1

Yes, they compare, since soccer matches have up to 70k people at them, there are 10 matches a week (top level only), and people travel across the country. Shopping, concerts etc. also add up to a lot of people. It's not like all the people at the march would have just stayed at home on a different weekend.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 09:37 AM
2

Did they really ignore warnings? Hundreds of thousands also travelled to football matches. In fact, a Champions League match between a Spanish and Italian team is believed to have caused major outbreaks in both cities. The reality is that society was running as normal one day, then within a few days it stopped. Is everyone who went to a sporting event, a concert, shopping, travelled etc. dumb idiots, just because society shut down a few days after they did it? There's no need to attack them just…
/r/MensRights31/03/20 03:00 AM
2

I expected them to be assholes, but they're NTA. They're not randomly aborting a baby to get a girl; she's pregnant with four embryos after IVF, can't afford four kids, and her body may struggle to handle such a pregnancy. The girls are identical twins too.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 02:51 PM
1

"Only" 24%? Wtf.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 12:09 PM
4

Masculinity NOUN Qualities or attributes regarded as characteristic of men. https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/masculinity Adding an adjective before nouns creates a subset of whatever the noun refers to. E.g. Chemical NOUN a distinct compound or substance, especially one which has been artificially prepared or purified. https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/chemical A "toxic chemical" would be "a distinct compound or substance, that is also toxic". It wouldn't be saying anything about chemical…
/r/MensRights28/03/20 12:03 PM
2

Yep, I've been thinking this for a while. "Masculinity" refers to the characteristics and traits associated with men. Adding an adjective before nouns creates a subset of whatever the noun refers to. "Toxic men" would refer to only men who were toxic, and not men in general. But since masculinity refers to characteristics and traits associated with men, "toxic masculinity" refers to a toxic subset of the traits associated with men. Essentially, it's saying men have some toxic characteristics. Ad…
/r/MensRights28/03/20 11:43 AM
3

The virus was at a different stage in those places. Hindsight is 20/20. Sports and concerts were still on. If you can find me 5 comments from reddit from a day after, criticising the march because of coronavirus dangers, I will give you gold.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:51 AM
3

They went to the manifestation anyway. There is no justification for that. Yes there is. Nobody was being recommended to stay at home at that point. Similar large gatherings were not cancelled. Stop rewriting history.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:34 AM
1

Spain's government declared emergency just one day after IWD. Do you think it was a coincidence? A coincidence how? It takes several days to show any symptoms, so any infections from the previous day wouldn't be known yet. In the video, you can see many signs saying “Sexism/The Patriarchy kills more than Coronavirus”. They were downplaying the severity of the pandemic. OK, but they're still obviously not at fault for marching - nobody was being advised to stay at home at that point.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 08:35 AM
1

It's false to say feminists were reckless for doing this, since IWD was on the 8th March and nobody was in lock down at that point in time. La Liga had matches in packed stadiums all over Spain that weekend. I went to an arena gig that week too, but now I'm inside aside from buying food.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 03:45 AM
1

Bruh that's a lot of emojis.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:01 AM
1

This isn't men's rights. Also, she merely posted a picture of a sunset and then words of support regarding the virus. Stop projecting.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 02:08 PM
3

Not men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 09:13 PM
3

It's crazy how something can be normalised, that otherwise would be horrifying.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 09:07 PM
3

So why don't you guys care about women's inequality? I can't speak for anyone else, but I do care, although I think in the western world, gender inequality is massively overblown. If you guys both actually fought for both I wouldnt have a problem. There's an entire industry dedicated to fighting for female interests. I don't think they need another scrub like me. But in reality people join these groups so they can be the victims I haven't "joined" a group. I merely think that feminism is about p…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 06:40 PM
1

Yeah, that was my point.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 06:38 PM
1

Those aren't exactly as serious though. They're more like a deal or exchange surrounding sex, than an argreement regarding the sex itself. If someone says they had a vasectomy, you're consenting to having sex with them on the basis you're unlikely to get pregnant. Otherwise, you'd make them use a condom. It's not that far from consenting to vaginal sex and them sticking it in her pooper instead.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 01:43 AM
1

Why do we need to think in such rigid terms as "one gender is oppressed", instead of tackling inequality where we find it?
/r/MensRights16/03/20 01:36 AM
18

Did you know it is possible for someone to believe in the value of and support the idea of women's rights without believing that feminism is the solution? Crazy, eh? It's almost like there are multiple philosophical approaches to life that each have their benefits and drawbacks. This is exactly why feminists try to say feminism is merely the belief that men and women are equal. They try to tie the two together so that you either believe in equality and also have to swallow feminist opinion on wh…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 03:35 PM
13

I got banned from r/feminism for commenting on a post "More proof men don't want women to be independent": If you think "men" don't want women to be independent, you're not a feminist - you're a misandrist. I've called out misogyny here and not been banned.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 01:28 PM
2

I read this before the title, noticing it was a cross post from r/feminism. Surprisingly wholesome. Edit: Lol, apparently it was originally on r/wholesomememes.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 01:20 PM
1

Fine then, the majority. Where's your evidence?
/r/MensRights13/03/20 08:40 PM
-1

You do have to be careful in cases where the accused is high profile and disliked, but there are many accusers, and women testified convincingly under oath, in court, that he assaulted them.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 06:24 PM
1

You've claimed all the murders of men in Mexico are men involved in drugs and cartels. Maybe provide some evidence for this, instead of dismissing all the victims because they don't fit the desired narrative.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 12:12 PM
2

Not one woman total; one for every nine men. Also, they ain't just gang bangers. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-51370680 Nine people, including at least four boys aged under 18, have been shot dead in an amusement arcade in the city of Uruapan in western Mexico.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:56 AM
1

Kill all humans. Uh, I mean yes. Nope, I haven't heard of any killer robots; sounds like a myth.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:40 AM
2

World Cup attendance at the men's tournament is considerably higher, and tickets cost a lot more. For US friendlies or North American tournaments, maybe the women have a bigger gate.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:36 AM
3

When nine guys disappear and end up dismembered in a grave, it's "just" bad. When the same happens to one woman, it's an abomination and clearly a sign of how terrible men treat women.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:25 AM
1

I don't think women necessarily have true equality (in some areas men may not either), but for the most part, I think the western world is doing pretty well. Some of the things you mentioned, like (sexual) violence, are problematic when viewing them through the lens of gender equality. Women are physically smaller and weaker, in general, than men. Given people who are willing to be violent exist, it is unlikely we'll ever eradicate violence. Given that size and strength disadvantages make you mo…
/r/MensRights12/03/20 06:35 PM
4

I'm sure if a jealous woman threw acid on her and melted her face off, she'd be happy that it wasn't a man who did it, because reasons. Imagine if she dismissed black male murder victims when the perpetrator was black? "Oh, it's only the blacks killing themselves". It amazes me how she can't realise how incredibly hateful her attitude is towards men.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 12:36 AM
5

I'm 20 seconds in, and she's full of shit. I have held my keys between my knuckles preemptively on too many occasions to even begin to recall. I don't go out running or walking around my area at night, because I'm not sure if it's safe. If I was allowed to carry pepper spray or a taser, I would. I have walked before with 999 entered in my phone, ready to press call. I have often got a taxi home after gigs, because I'd be taking a risk if I walked. She acknowledges we get murdered, but then bigot…
/r/MensRights12/03/20 12:24 AM
2

It literally mentioned handling and automatic rear braking. You could switch the genders of the characters and it would be the same ad. It's just "this car doesn't compromise, so you shouldn't either - get that promotion you were promised!" It honestly feels like a common advertising trope too - employee getting dicked over by the boss is encouraged by the brand ambassador to stick up for themselves.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 01:03 AM
1

That goes completely against any and all self defense philosophies. If you feel the the need to defend yourself in a physical altercation, you strike without warning, intensely, savagely, and as violently as you can. Your goal should be to kill or incapacitate your attacker as quickly as possible. In response to someone hitting the top of your head with a weak, downward, overhand, open palm strike? Especially considering that "someone" probably isn't strong enough to do a press up? I'm imagining…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 08:30 PM
1

By that logic it's acceptable to gut someone with a rusty aids knife in response to a diddy twister. Or boot a toddler in the face after they hit your leg. She struck the top of his head (a hard part), with her open hand (a lot of fingers instead of palm too), in a downwards motion (hard to get force into it), while being a pretty small female (much physically weaker than him). Did she kinda deserve the punch for initiating violence? Sure, a bit. It's still really excessive. In order of force, h…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 08:24 PM
1

I didn't even notice it, lol
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:42 PM
12

The Northern Ireland Life & Times survey covers a ton of political and cultural opinions, is highly respected, and has been carried out for a few decades now. It has shown that men were marginally more supportive of allowing abortion than women. It's a philosophical and/or religious question, not one related to gender. There are no circumstances where having an abortion is justified. 11% of women agreed vs 9% for men. Source Thinking about the laws on abortion in Northern Ireland. Do you think t…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 12:59 PM
5

In the EU 33% of women were subjected to physical and/or sexual violence, while 55% were sexually harassed. No timeframe was listed here, there weren't any comparable male statistics, nor did they take into account the fact that smaller, physically weaker people will be more vulnerable to violence and be victims at a higher rate. "Total" statistics like this are also a terrible way to measure a problem. I, as a man, have been sexually harassed by women, but it isn't a significant problem in my l…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:08 PM
1

Ah, the intellectual's response. Thank God for the block feature.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 10:39 AM
0

It probably would be best if you did leave this subreddit. Nope, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 11:43 AM
0

This is literally the same kind of reaction I get from feminists when I criticise their negative generalisations of men.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:56 AM
1

Let me ask you this. Do you consider that men are different to women, or are you going to object an and label that as a blanket generalisation? Buddy, there's a gulf between "men and women are generally different" and "they're mostly gold digging thots".
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:54 AM
1

Modern western society does not respect men's rights to their children and their hard-earned wealth they've toiled away for, nor does it value the contributions men make in the household, or in terms of being victims of domestic abuse (including emotional and physical abuse). Knowing that our society and legal system favor women, many women in western society are gladly taking advantage of this. Except you weren't crusading against the inequality you listed, or saying that some women take advant…
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:48 AM
0

You can't deny that many women fit his description. Some do. If you really held women to the same standards, then why aren't you calling out all the blatant misandry by women? Pretty sure I have called out misandry where I've seen it His post was nothing compared to all the crap that women write/say about men. Whataboutery. Your silencing tactic is the same type that feminists use against men, but it's not going to work in here. I've made it clear that I have no issue with criticising the kind o…
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:42 AM
0

Not, he was talking about "western women". There's a difference between criticising entitled women, and painting the majority of women as being entitled. You have no evidence that I don't hold women and men to the same standards.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:23 AM
0

Why would I want to criticise women as a group? I'm not a bigot. Why would I want to go to a man-hating subreddit? I care about men's rights and gender equality.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:16 AM
1

Survey proves most women It's a twitter poll of people who follow her, not survey of a representative sample of women.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:02 AM
-1

Yep, this place has become infested by idiots from there looking to escape before it's banned. Women suck huurr durrr is not related to men's right. This is barely veiled misogyny, which is not what a gender equality sub is about.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 12:51 AM
1

Well they're correct - there is nothing he can legally do. Nor would I agree with someone being forced to incubate a fetus.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 03:07 PM
8

Wrestling isn't hitting.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 12:42 PM
-10

Wtf is this misogynistic shit? Go back to r/mgtow
/r/MensRights27/02/20 10:49 PM
1

Why exactly would men being more violent be a problem that needs treated? You treat the actual problem of violence and its causes, not the gender.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 09:19 PM
3

If someone produced statistics saying black people were more likely to commit crimes, would you assume black people are inherently more prone to criminality? Or would you look at other things that affect propensity towards crime, like socioeconomic status? People are more likely to sustain serious injury from domestic violence if their partner meets a specific threshold of strength, and if the disparity between each partner's strength eclipses a particular size. Strength also correlates with mas…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 08:58 PM
-2

She explains why she thinks women are more likely to experience domestic violence than men. "It's the behaviours that we encourage in little boys and little girls, then we expect women to be attractive for men, they're objectified. "Women are turned into products and men into consumers. And it's a consumer that has the power rather than what they're buying," she tells Radio 1 Newsbeat. Couldn't it be more to do with strength being a pretty necessary component of most violence? These statistics w…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 08:52 PM
1

Yes, accurate. Police reported it was a heavy object. She repeatedly battered him over the head Source?
/r/MensRights18/02/20 08:02 PM
0

She. repeatedly. bludgeoned. a . defenseless. man. about. the. head. with. a. heavy. blunt. object. until. his. head. split. open. Not strictly accurate. She hit him with a lamp over his head, but we don't know if it was once or repeatedly, nor do we know the mass of the object.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 02:02 PM
3

Then you lose your high profile career and have to make a living like everyone else. I have a hard time eliciting sympathy for someone who did this. There's a weird narrative being formed where she's ultimately the victim, and it's someone else's fault.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 02:00 PM
7

It amazes me when feminists complain about "not all men!!1" It's not hard to abstain from stereotyping men as violent predators. People asking this of you does not place some arduous burden upon you. If you're annoyed that their protests are "detracting" attention from the assault, then be annoyed at yourself, since you're the one who chose to put the distraction in there.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 01:55 PM
2

https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NINTCHDBPICT000550809843.jpg
/r/MensRights15/02/20 07:31 PM
1

The guy in the video is a baby. The seats are made to recline. It wasn't even impinging on him to any significant degree.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 07:00 PM
0

Nature isn't a sentient force, dipshit.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 06:57 PM
1

This is kinda funny. It's also obviously not something that is seriously going to pass, but is just making a point.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 06:56 PM
4

She sent nude pictures of herself to a child, tried to solicit nudes in return, and attempted to convince him to have sex with her. Thirteen year olds don't have enough understanding and maturity to consent to sex, especially not with an adult. Do you honestly think society should allow adults to behave in such a predatory way? Why should we allow people to plan, conspire, and attempt to commit serious crimes? If she was trying to convince others to rob a bank with her, sending the blueprints of…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 09:19 AM
5

Hah, it's funny - I thought the father sounded like a major asshole. When I read the mother's post, it seemed kind of unfair, but somewhat reasonable. I had to go back and read the first to check they were identical. If I'm a man and have that impression, it worries me how women perceive men compared to women. Edit: Although maybe it's how I assumed the trips would be. I pictured the mother's as being something "girly", like shopping for fancy outfits, or a spa. I pictured the father's as campin…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 09:50 PM
12

I remember someone asked people on Reddit what the first thing I did when I got in the car was. I thought, "Put on my seatbelt, check the mirror" etc. They said that a woman's first thought would be to lock the door, and that this was an example of how men didn't need to worry. Ironically, the reason I didn't think of locking the door as being the first thing, is that doing it is always an automatic instinct. Any time I'm stopped or moving slowly around people, I'll often check if I've remembere…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 09:43 PM
1

Fuck, I'm a male beauty professional, and I've been telling everyone I've been doing a lot of child grooming lately /s
/r/MensRights13/02/20 09:26 PM
8

She said she wanted to take his virginity, told him she'd be stopping by his area soon, knew he was 13, asked for nudes from him, and became weird and obsessive. Dude. This is a textbook case of child grooming. She wanted to fuck that child. A 13 year old child. What she did is legitimately a crime.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 09:24 PM
16

He's not entirely wrong, but I wouldn't go as far as the screenshot. When you're dead, you're dead. If someone came up behind me right now without me knowing, and shot me in the back of the head, it would essentially have zero consequences for me. I'd just cease experiencing anything, like I'd done for eternity before birth, and will eventually do for the rest of eternity. Of course, what men have to face in the course of war before they die (and while), is infinitely worse than women having to …
/r/MensRights12/02/20 01:01 AM
-2

I listened up to the point where she went into her "monologue". The YouTuber misunderstood it horrifically. She's saying "with all the evidence I have, for you to come out looking good, people would either have to believe I got all the bruises from a secret fight club, or I planned this for three years, put on makeup to fake bruises, had corroborating conversations via text, and did this while continuing on a marriage."
/r/MensRights08/02/20 01:31 AM
4

If it was consensual (no indication it wasn't) then who cares?
/r/MensRights08/02/20 01:17 AM
1

They can charge anything, but would it stick? The law sounds very clear. Punching someone in the face isn't Assault II unless you seriously injure them in some way.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:50 PM
1

Assault II is not simple battery. https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/assault-second-and-third-degree-oregon.htm Under Oregon law, a person commits assault in the second degree if he: intentionally or knowingly causes serious physical injury to another person intentionally or knowingly causes physical injury to another person with a deadly or dangerous weapon, or recklessly causes serious physical injury to another person with a deadly or dangerous weapon, acting with extreme indiffe…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:44 PM
1

So if you remember, our original talk was about whether a MGTOW post was misogynistic, and calling women skanks. Your justification for it not being misogynistic, was that it was just "observing real behaviour", and you linked to Chlamydia stats. Now you seem to realise that you can't stand behind this claim. Thanks. Unfortunately your response to arguments that contradict your flawed worldview, seems to be to swear then block the person delivering them.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 04:26 PM
1

Yes, so what is your position? You do or don't think Chlamydia rates in women are down to increased promiscuity? Or have you backed down from that?
/r/MensRights03/02/20 04:21 PM
1

I'm not sure what your position is supposed to be now? Also, the idea that "basic economics gives incentives to men to focus on their careers without providing the same motivation to women" seems... very dubious. The incentive is to make money. Sure, you can marry a rich person and be dependent on them, and this is probably easier for women than men, but c'mon.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 04:04 PM
1

I just proved, with statistics from the CDC, that infection is more likely among females. Yes, but your hypothesis as to why women have a higher infection rate is that they sleep around. The higher infection rate could be due to women being more vulnerable to infection than men. E.g. When a man has sex with an infected women, is his likelihood of getting infected the same as when a women has sex with an infected man? This is not the case for other sexually transmitted diseases. HIV is much easie…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 03:30 PM
1

Yes, you still didn't comment on whether infection was equally likely among males/females, and are pretending that a higher rate of promiscuous women compared to men, would be representative of women as a whole. You're choosing to remain ignorant to justify your prejudice.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 03:16 PM
1

a) If chlamydia is more likely to be asymptomatic in women, then that means the amount of women who really have chlamydia is more than the amount who present with symptoms. So that's not a very good argument. You didn't touch on whether it was as easy for men to get infected as women. For example, it's very hard for a man to get HIV from vaginal sex, but easy for a woman to. b) Those statistics are representative of the US female population. That's why the CDC gives them Wat. It's not representa…
/r/MensRights02/02/20 01:53 AM
1

a) There is no evidence the higher rate is due to them having more sexual partners than men. Chlamydia is asymptomatic at a higher rate in women, and it may also be easier for them to get (not an expert, just did a quick Google search). b) Even if it was due to this, it still wouldn't be representative of "women" in general. It's always a danger to use statistics in a way that plays to your own prejudices.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 11:59 PM
1

Again, it's an observation of real behavior. In modern Western society, men are expected to be breadwinners (hence why they tend to go into high-income fields like engineering and business) while women are expected to marry and get their husband's money (hence why they tend to major in art or psychology, or alternatively spend their 20s partying and "sleeping around"). That is not an observation of real behaviour. It's a ridiculous generalisation that isn't based in reality.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 11:45 PM
1

It refers to women in general, not the women responding to the tweet. It was being used as an example of what they think women are like in general.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 11:32 PM
1

The title: Women know that they are the ones that sleep around in their 20s cause us men in our 20s we are building our foundations for the future while your future ex-wife is fucking a different dude every week. Some of the comments are pretty gross too.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 11:02 PM
3

Uh, OK.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 08:14 PM
4

What about misandry on those fucker's subs, is it ok to let them keep going ?? Nope. Why are you on men's rights sub?? Because I want men and women to be treated equally. A sub calling women skanks is just as bad as a sub calling dudes rapists. Why are you here? MGTOW seemed the opposite of what this sub stands for.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 07:04 PM
1

In what way is calling women irresponsible skanks and comparing them to dogs, a "discussion of how unfairly men are treated"? https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/ew7cel/women_know_that_they_are_the_ones_that_sleep/
/r/MensRights01/02/20 07:01 PM
4

Those subs being bad, doesn't make r/MGTOW any better. I don't think quarantining a sub that has a high volume of misogyny is anti male.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 06:59 PM
0

Literally one of the first posts I saw when I checked it out, was calling women skanks and saying men were instead responsible adults. One of the top comments compared women to dogs. So yes, it was a discussion sub - discussion about how bad they thought women were. Why would I care if a "man's voice" was suppressed? Having a dick doesn't make you special.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 06:52 PM
-19

90% of that sub^* is ragging on women and how horrible they are as a "species". If someone is happier single, then I fully support that, but that sub was a circle jerk about how much women suck. ^* This is a somewhat uneducated opinion, based on very brief scrolling through it whenever it happens to be mentioned. My last look through a few days ago, was not good.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 04:55 PM
57

From a cursory glance, it doesn't seem as bad, but when you dig in, they talk about "moids" and wanting to live in a female only world. It would probably get as bad as MGTOW if it had more members. It's 2.5k vs 200k.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 03:24 PM
1

There's one dude called "just_sayin_bro" or something, who is freakin mental. He's just a straight up misogynist and transphobe, and not in the loose way that people like to throw around as a smear. I hope they don't start to infect this sub if MGTOW gets banned.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 03:00 PM
1

How terrible that people enjoy sex, rather than saving themselves to be your first...
/r/MensRights01/02/20 02:39 PM
–

MGTOWer: MGTOW isn't misogynistic gets shown front page misogynistic post But sure that's all true!
/r/MensRights31/01/20 07:21 PM
–

No, it doesn't sound true. There are over three billion women on the planet, so of course there are millions who are excessively promiscuous, just like there are millions of men. To say men in general are spending their twenties being responsible, while women have sex with as many guys as possible, is extremely misogynistic, while also being sex negative.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 07:05 PM
–

I checked it out yesterday and this was the first post I saw: "Women know that they are the ones that sleep around in their 20s cause us men in our 20s we are building our foundations for the future while your future ex-wife is fucking a different dude every week." https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/ew7cel/women_know_that_they_are_the_ones_that_sleep/ That's misogynistic as fuck.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 06:58 PM
–

Yeah, I never frequented it but I thought it was originally supposed to be aspirational, like the sub description said. A quick browse of it showed waaay too much woman hating. One of the first ones I saw was about women being sluts or something. Can't say I disagree with or care about the quarantine. Edit: https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/ew7cel/women_know_that_they_are_the_ones_that_sleep/ Title: Women know that they are the ones that sleep around in their 20s cause us men in our 20s we…
/r/MensRights31/01/20 06:53 PM
1

Looks like it was deleted by mods. A buried comment that gets removed for being against the rules isn't exactly a good representation of the sub.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 04:03 PM
2

I don't identify as an MRA either shrug. I've never seen anyone talk about white genocide here
/r/MensRights31/01/20 09:26 AM
2

Legitimately didn't know who this comic artist was until the comment above. The linked comics are disturbing, but it doesn't mean this one isn't spot on. The person who posted it likely just agreed with the comic, and had no idea about who the artist was. MRA: why do people associate us with far right 4channers? Uh, we know why this is. Feminists like to say feminism is just the belief that men and women are equal, but in practice enforce it as "agreeing with our beliefs and theories regarding g…
/r/MensRights30/01/20 10:39 PM
1

They wanted free travel, accommodation, food, and a hugely beneficial opportunity that could be put on their CV. They didn't get selected for the team, and expected the University to just give them these benefits purely for being a woman.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 12:30 PM
1

The site you linked says she described the abuser's 15 year old victim as "sexually provocative". I can't verify, as she doesn't seem to have the interview on her YouTube channel, despite having a plethora of videos on there. Did she remove it? The site also references misleading claims on her book summaries, which mention her "thirty five years of experience as a psychologist". There may be something to their claims.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:58 PM
1

Maybe I'm misreading it, but it says he didn't pay anything or offer to pay 50/50, in which case he's a raging arsehole .
/r/MensRights26/01/20 03:07 PM
1

Oh yeah, I agree - in Northern Ireland the waiting lists are ridiculous, but that's largely down to our bizarre system of government (mandatory coalition; if you get a certain number of seats, you're entitled to a government post, leading to an essentially permanent 5 party coalition). But even then, if I can afford it I can get private insurance and treatment anyway. I've had a number of treatments on the NHS over the years, and have no complaints. My sister also has a bad eating disorder and h…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 04:04 PM
1

Health care is such a fundamental need, and an individualistic free market approach makes it difficult for a lot of people to get adequate care. You can either pay insurance to a company looking to make a profit, that may or may not cover you properly, or everybody can group together and pay insurance (via taxation) and guarantee that you'll always be covered.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 01:42 PM
3

She wasn't released on bail, she was released under investigation. That probably means she hasn't been charged with anything and they're still investigating.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 07:51 PM
1

She went to jail for 15 years. His sentence was unrelated to her's.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 01:11 AM
2

Men didn't get the vote until 135 years ago in the UK.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 04:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter