TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Gorms_Hoard Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by Gorms_Hoard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

If a man says it's a man's world then he's a misogynist, but a woman saying it's a man's world is a feminist, LOL
/r/AntiFeminists27/01/22 10:52 PM
4

Exactly so why are women still treated like men are? I'm not sure what you mean here. No, you didn't but it almost seems you implied that feminism is advocating for more rights then what men recieve, which just isn't true, because feminism is literally just wanting equality. This is not my position. My position is that the means through which feminism seeks gender equality does not actually reach the stated end, because feminism by definition is about women's rights, not men's rights.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:46 PM
4

What grounds do you have to disagree with that though? Because being a man doesn't mean you're automatically higher status than a woman. the fact that so many other woman can resonate and feel so passionately that it's true, why do you feel the need to invalidate and question it? Because I think the idea is generally false. Feminism isn't advancing womens rights above mens I didn't say that.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:33 PM
3

feminism is wanting equality For mainstream feminism I agree, but the problem is that since feminism's idea of creating equality is through advancing women's rights, the rights that men don't have go unaddressed, so actual equality wouldn't be achieved when operating under this definition. Also, this definition implies that men have higher societal standing than women, a position that many feminists lean towards, and which I very much disagree with. These are the main reasons why I would call my…
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/22 11:03 PM
1

Now, be honest - how much empathy do you feel for those people over sheer anger and frustration? I feel empathy tbh. Im still against the misandry though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/21 12:09 AM
2

Nice. I didn't coin it tho. I think it came from /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:39 PM
2

Maybe "toxic gender roles" in that case.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 07:03 PM
1

Just "toxic behavior" I guess.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:40 PM
1

I'm not really disputing that, I'm just asking if you think this is a reason you should avoid using a term like toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:55 PM
1

Maybe the reason we see women as gold diggers, or the reason they choose to do it, is rooted it that idea that women are supposed to be manipulative. It's engrained in the culture in such a way that it seems natural. Perhaps... though if you wanted to do away with such perceptions, wouldn't you want to avoid assigning behaviors as being masculine or feminine?
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:49 PM
1

"These specific traits and behaviors, that are by and large considered masculine, are not great." How is that not denigration tho? Like if I said "toxic femininity is when women are gold diggers", that'd be pretty sexist, agree?
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:24 PM
5

What is male culture? And how?
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:35 AM
7

You can't tell me, as a male, that you've never experienced men talking about women as if they were an object or peer pressuring a friend to do something they don't want to do. Because I have and that is toxic masculinity. I just dont get why you would need to bring someone's sex into it. I mean women also objectify men and engage in peer pressure but why would I need to call that "toxic femininity"? What purpose does that serve? To me it seems like a way to denigrate a group of people. That's w…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:24 AM
33

Being a woman or a non-white means you're vulnerable Very condescending tbh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 07:46 PM
18

Here's an article that criticizes the first study's findings. If you're perceptive, you might have noticed something strange already: that 1-in-3 figure cannot be straightforwardly derived from the sexual aggression scale, as the scale is a five-point measure, whereas the 1-in-3 statistic is clearly dichotomous. To put these figures in better context, we could consider the results reported by Malamuth (1989). In response to the "Would you rape if you wouldn't get caught" question, 74% of men ind…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:24 AM
2

Just genocide your own tribe to end violence theory
/r/AntiFeminists09/05/21 08:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter