TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GrabEmByTheBalls Archive

View 7 posts and 120 comments by GrabEmByTheBalls on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You are now banned from /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:16 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x049DapcYho
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:08 PM
1

Journalists are playing to the crowd. They know that 'woman is beaten by other women' will have less of an emotional effect than 'woman is beaten by people'. In a sense it is misogynistic as well, because people think women are harmless and so being attacked by them isn't newsworthy. But this is the 'women are wonderful' type of misogyny that you'll never hear feminists complain about.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 04:35 PM
1

For men that's the key reason for harsh sentences: to prevent others from considering committing a crime in the first place. However, a more lenient sentence is the norm for a confession.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 04:24 PM
2

A major part of the issue as well is that most of the decisions involving abortion legislation are made by male politicians Women are actually about 50/50 split on the issue of abortion, so it's not at all about men telling women what to do, it's about the electorate making a majority decision.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 03:57 PM
2

The second men become the majority of stay at home parents, we'll get arguments against the primary carer being given custody.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 11:30 AM
2

You joke, but that is the direction it's heading. We know the pay gap is a myth because women lose earnings when they have children. Once that's accepted by all sides, the argument will then turn to society paying women more to make up for that biological disadvantage.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:53 AM
2

"it's complicated" Fucking lol.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 10:48 AM
3

If they class that as rape, then so is lying about being on the pill. A far more common crime.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:36 PM
1

Not being able to jump garden fences springs to mind.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:31 PM
15

I think it does matter to them. If there are men's issues too in many of the same areas as women's issues then it devalues their assertion that the issues are gendered, which removes some of their power. That why they fight so hard against men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:37 AM
3

#killallmen hashtag is a joke Like 'grab em by the pussy' is just locker room talk.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:24 AM
2

just like us What control do we have exactly?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:03 PM
4

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. It's not even just parental abortion. Until issues such as paternity fraud, default paternity, funding for male contraception, equal custody rights, and a whole host of other things are taken seriously, then I won't care about their relatively minor issue.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:34 AM
12

making abortions a lot more expensive means many women won't have access to them anymore I'm sorry, but until men have legal rights to parental abortion, then my answer will typically be 'they should've kept their legs shut', because that is always their answer to men's rights. I do believe that women have abortion rights, but I have no sympathy for their issue at all.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:24 AM
12

abortion rights And they have them in most countries. What they want is unlimited free abortions at the tax payers' expense.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:03 AM
1

Wholly crap that sub is cancer. It's set up as some sort of Q&A but the answers are all terrible, often just stating opinions as fact without any attempt explain. Anything that is vaguely critical is locked.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:20 PM
3

Okay, so I looked under their environment heading and most of the articles seem fairly balanced.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 12:35 AM
1

Can you link to any examples?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 12:21 AM
2

Why exactly? I can't see much wrong with their articles. They get a lot of hate for claiming to be alt-right before the term became strongly associated with white supremacists, but they don't host articles any where near that extreme.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 02:50 PM
53

Oh ffs, come on. How many times is this going to get posted?
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:12 PM
1

Seems to me the vast majority of posts here are hard hitting news stories. The mods are also active and seem to be MRAs themselves. Not too worried tbh.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 05:17 AM
1

because we are mostly stronger than our female coworkers. And die younger because of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:58 AM
0

Not at all. I've worked many jobs like that. One place had a KPI that women routinely failed to meet. They were all given warnings but never fired, making the warning fairly pointless. Another had a 50/50 split of men and women on the intake for a machine operating job. The men learned to operate the machinery quickly yet the women mainly spent their time talking. Worst part was that people held men to a higher standard yet gave the women a lot of slack. Yet another place, men did all the shitty…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:53 AM
2

For most men definitely. But men at the top sacrifice pretty much everything for work. He touched on it in this video, but explains it a bit more in this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Awot-d8U9Cc
/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:50 PM
5

Dr Peterson is extremely good at describing and contextualising precisely why the dominant left-wing and feminist views on social conditioning are so terribly wrong, and ultimately tyrannical. Worth a watch.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 11:56 AM
6

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/11/millionaire-not-genius-should-give-ex-wife-half-180-million/ The couple, who met in the USA and have two teenage children, split up after Ms Gray had an affair with their "personal physiotherapist".
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:30 PM
10

Mr Justice Holman said they had been ”two strong and equal partners” over 20 years and Ms Gray had been a ”good wife” and ”home-maker”. Strong and equal partner that earned none of the money and instead was a 'homemaker' (i.e did fuck all). Good wife until she started sleeping around. It's like double think.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:30 PM
1

It is insane the amount of control 'at will' employment gives employers over your life. It's not just at will. We have perfectly fine employment rights in the UK atm. But if these things are against company policy then it's a simple enough task to go with gross misconduct.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 01:56 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/64f8hj/i_recently_watched_the_red_pill_as_a_male_who_had/dg1soog/
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:56 AM
2

In fairness, that's exactly what communism leads to anyway. It's all about group/class based war, with oppressors and oppressed. Stalin butchered millions of farmers because they were painted as oppressors of the real proletariat. It lead to a famine that killed millions more. The radical left and their ever growing number of oppressed groups with one single oppressor is getting dangerously close to that ideology.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:46 AM
-1

Socialists too, even have a name for it: brocialism.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:26 AM
3

There could be lots of reasons for this: men are in more tech orientated jobs that pay better men are more aggressive wage negotiators and obviously one is that google is systematically discriminating The last one seems highly unlikely. Unfortunately that means that unless Google fights this all the way to the supreme court, the precedent is likely to be that either wage negotiations will become a thing of the past or that less skilled jobs like HR and media will pay as well as tech jobs simply …
/r/MensRights10/04/17 03:00 AM
8

This is not a gendered issue. The ruling affects all parents.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:44 AM
1

Would you call a women that say 'keep it in your pants' pro abstinence?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 02:33 AM
1

I suspect the only thing that will change this is the widespread availability of reversible vasectomies or safe male contraceptives. Only then will men have any sort of bargaining position in this fight.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:57 PM
1

Of course there are many other reasons that society is opposed to abortion, But the days of Christian conservatism and their notion of female chastity are long since gone, so nowadays when women are told they should keep it in their knickers, it is meant as a direct corollary to 'keep it in your pants'.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:50 PM
11

Honestly I get the impression from your comments that you are simply a paedophile apologist, whether female or male. I don't think this is something that the men's rights movement should condone or even tolerate. Paedophile rights groups latched onto the gay rights movement a few decades ago, they are a cancer and we should be careful not to let them ride our coattails.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:12 PM
16

You're suggesting there is only ONE path, that it is damaging to every single one. By doing that, you're doing the exact OPPOSITE of people who say "there is no 13 year old male victim of molestation, because they all want it". Considerable number of girl victims of male paedophiles also enjoy it, that's how grooming works. Many see it as cool. For girls, social attitudes have changed considerably in the last 50 years but it hasn't for boys. Older men like you still encourage paedophilia, becaus…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 12:45 PM
2

As men's rights activists, we are precisely the people that should be actively opposing this in our daily lives. You are espousing men's rights pacifism not activism.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 11:25 PM
2

I disagree with this completely. It is a formula for keeping the status quo, for letting women that abuse power win. The solution is to take reasonable steps to protect your integrity and then fight any false accusation as far as possible. Never make it easy.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 11:17 PM
2

Yeah, women have some issues (mostly social at this point) Current burning issues appear to be high heeled shoes at work and tax-free/discounted sanitary wear.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 11:02 PM
3

Alarming. And do I get the impression that this is seen as a positive by the site?
/r/MensRights08/04/17 10:47 PM
5

It's an odd way to say that the legal system unfairly discriminates against men for parenting rights, whether it's shared parental leave, employment rights or family court judgements.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 09:48 AM
9

Vasalgel isn't dead.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:12 AM
2

There was probably some fuckshittery on the servers 24 hours ago. My comment was definitely on that thread, and at the time my comments were taken 5+ minutes to appear. My guess is that /u/spez got involved.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:44 PM
2

Sorry but every 'specific behaviour' is interpreted subjectively. I.e guy watching kids in the park, guy hanging around in a van outside school, etc. You would not treat a woman the same way in the circumstances the OP of that post described.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:41 PM
1

You are banned from feminism now, afaik. Anyone that posts here is.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:28 PM
3

They found the lack of women leaders wasn’t attributed to a lack of want—of the 650 women who participated in the survey, 57 percent said they aspired to lead a nonprofit. And 62 percent of respondents had more than 10 years of nonprofit experience under their belt. What a staggeringly dumb statement. I'm sure if you surveyed 650 men, most would say they've love a leadership role too. Wanting something doesn't mean shit.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:52 AM
3

Racist too then. It's not like black guys don't also have bravado, I mean has she never listened to rap? It's a fairly universal trait, amongst men and women.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:32 AM
1

Nothing I've posted suggests that, and judging by your post history you're just a troll.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:20 AM
11

Suspicious - based on what? Reverse the genders - if it was a middle aged women hitting a young boy, would anyone rush to help? Even if it was violent the assumption would be that it was just a mother disciplining their child, or a lady fending off pesky troublemakers. The reason for the suspicion in the first place is due to the sexist stereotype that 'men are violent'. It also assumes that 'women are weak' and so need protection, so it's misogyny too.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:32 AM
4

Yep, one can only assume the "problem" in her mind is that women don't commit suicide successfully.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:10 AM
19

You just wait til as a father, it happens every day. Go to the park with daughter - get nasty stares, pick up daughter from school - get pulled over by police, take her shopping - get people 'subtly checking' she's okay - constantly, every day. That's constant, grinding discrimination. The assumption that everyone makes is sexist at its core, it doesn't matter how politely they go about acting on their sexism.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:03 AM
3

the Prison Reform Trust says 85% have been sentenced for a non-violent offence, compared with 70% of male prisoners The crux of this is that the court system is also biased such that women that commit violent crimes are not sentenced as a violent offender. If women were prosecuted comparably to men for things like sexual assault, domestic violence and child abuse, the numbers would be a lot higher.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 02:14 PM
7

However, it is permissible to provide single-sex services if they can objectively justify providing the service in this way. How can they justify it though? There is a 'ladies only' gym around our way. I remember a decade or so ago there was a big clamp down on gentleman's clubs for precisely the same reasons.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:41 PM
5

This one hits all the typical talking points: 'women are wonderful' so here's a list of sob stories for why they are in prison 'record numbers' which are still insignificant compared to male suicide in prison not a single mention of the bigger issue of male suicides, except 'suicide attempts'. But you can be sure as shit any such article wouldn't pull statistics about childhood experience out of their arse to make male criminals seem human.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 03:02 PM
5

often make them for another reason, such as personal issues, health issues or even past history of sexual violence and often when something like this happens, the person can be forgotten in the fury that follows a false accusation This is actually classic misogyny believe it or not. Treating women as victims even when they are perpetrators was highlighted by this study. They argue that female perpetration is downplayed among professionals in mental health, social work, public health, and law, wi…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:46 PM
1

What about civilian casualties?
/r/MensRights29/03/17 08:53 PM
36

I consider myself left wing, always have. Strongly believe in equal rights, liberalism. Just so happens that men have less rights and are more disadvantaged by state legislature nowadays.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 07:10 PM
28

He is a millionaire and it is the law in the UK that the richest partner will lose half their shit. It is a given.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:37 PM
-1

That's already a given.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:31 PM
3

And in the comments: people calling for him to die. That's the state of society now.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 05:28 PM
8

Interesting that despite places like /r/athiesm taking on every religiously instigated injustice such as pro-choice, gay rights, etc, they have nothing to say about this issue.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 02:51 PM
2

breaks rule 1 in fact.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:28 AM
7

It's not a masculine trait. Self-reliant women also suffer a far higher rate of depression. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-rights-happiness-wellbeing-gender-gap Also, this is yet another paper based on the "Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory" which is utter junk science. Literally fabricated by a small group of gender studies students.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:41 PM
12

Based upon the information in the article, there is no indication that she was aware of the driver's level of drunkenness. You mean this article, that states it unequivocally? When she learned the baby had died, however, she told police she knew she and Fuller were both drunk when they got into the car, and that Fuller was the driver. And it wasn't just drunk, she was on a cocktail of drugs: Fuller had taken citalpram, alprazolam and Ambien, charging documents state.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:34 PM
2

Pure, unadulterated sexism.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:56 PM
1

Men are just much more violent in general. This is a misrepresentation. There are more violent men, but men in general are not more violent. As with all traits in men, they vary widely on a bell curve, so for every violent man there is a pacifist, but their behaviour does not affect the average violence.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 04:42 PM
9

Nah, that's all complete bollocks, it's based on the sexist idea that men are only interested in sex. Here: What makes a creep is their deliberate insensitivity to lack of interest or active repulsion by their target. An impossible statement to make without first assuming the only reason to be looking is sexual interest. A reminder: when women stare it is called people watching, is seen as a positive interest with no bad connotations. The double standard is due to sexism alone. The discussion of…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:15 PM
17

Feminists should be fighting against this. Given perspective, the only victims currently allowed to do this are children. This change treats women like children that are incapable of handling difficult situations.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:35 AM
26

I guess you're right. Like all violence, it's mainly a men's issue. And we have the stats to prove it: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-39328233 Men are twice as likely to be victims of acid attacks in London than women, it was found. The vast majority of cases never reach trial, according to the figures. In fact, one might go as far as to say that the only reason this isn't a more newsworthy topic is that men are the primary victims. The public don't care and the justice system gets …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:16 AM
18

Justice served, sentence appropriate. Don't see there's anything to complain about from a MR perspective.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:41 PM
-1

Hmm, I don't think feminism is responsible for this. Women have always had a privileged position when it comes to the courts, especially the family courts. However in times gone by it was probably tolerated because in other areas men had privilege - voting rights etc. What feminism has done is fight for the privileges that men used to have for themselves. The problem now is that men still lack the many privileges that women have always enjoyed. On that issue feminists are predictably silent, but…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:22 PM
5

Unfortunately stuff like this usually ends up getting published by some crappy gender studies journal and will get used in debate. The quality of a lot of gender based social science is on this level when you look beneath the headline.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:33 PM
1

No, the original article mentions LGBT, even added the Q+ to account for the attack helicopters and such. Still not a word about the 77% homeless men.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:44 AM
3

Not anymore I'm afraid. Safe to say we've stolen the term.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:41 AM
7

It's only been a week since this: https://i.redd.it/5hssf1stv7ly.jpg. People are a bit fucking touchy about the subject. Me included.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:36 AM
1

No, because they would be over represented.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:32 AM
3

That's all there ever is.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:30 AM
1

Another one? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5z9a6v/while_the_protesters_of_portlands_womens_march/ Add to the long list of circumstantial evidence.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:28 AM
4

Note that the statistic on women is not indicated to be over-representative nor contextualized with any political statement. But it is given precedence, even though men are the biggest victims. This community is filled with angry people, because they see this type of shit in every news story. I'll remind you it was only a week ago when this picture from the Women March (for nothing) was released: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5z9a6v/while_the_protesters_of_portlands_womens_march/
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:23 AM
8

Aboriginals (38 per cent), people who identify as LGBTQ2+ (13 per cent) and veterans (11 per cent) are over-represented in the homeless population. Women make up 23 per cent of the homeless population. Not even a mention of men as a group in the entire article. Women making up only 23 per cent of the homeless population are massive under represented. FTFT.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:14 AM
3

Capitalism discriminates both genders and forces women to be at home No you're think of laws. Legal privileges women have to maternity leave in many countries, and special compensations they have from many employers that men simply don't have.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:03 AM
9

Given that we are seeing more and more women in those sorts of roles, I think it is fair to say that a lack of women in these roles is due to historical gender norms, not the abilities of individuals. We are not seeing more women in construction, it's still less than 5%. The only reason we are seeing more women in the military is because, frankly, it's not as brutal as it used to be. There's nothing sexist about saying the sexes have different traits and are generally better suited to different …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:56 AM
4

military, construction, police Why do you mix the three together? The police is a respectable career, impossible for most kids to get into. Granted the military can recruit hard amongst the poor, but for many it's the only way out of poverty. They have no choice. Those that do have a choice tend to enter at officer level. Construction is only worthwhile if you can learn a trade, and those opportunities are rare. There is no 'pay and status' that comes with labouring without a trade. And that is …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:40 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/5fj9un/the_understudied_female_sexual_predator_according/?utm_content=comments&utm_medium=browse&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=science
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:25 AM
13

Fairly obvious concern troll. "I agree but have this huge list of concerns". Let's get a few things clear: Men are at higher risk of violence than transgender, or any other group for that matter. Over double the assaults, double the homicide rate. You are thinking of 'hate crimes', which conveniently don't apply to men and is so broad to include getting heckled in the street. You go on and on about sexual assault, yet complete ignore the statistic that 90% of homeless men are victims of violence…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:23 AM
39

http://www.wsrescue.org/what-we-do/recovery-programs/ Seems like a religious cult, mostly focused on treating men like they need rescuing from themselves - anger management, substance abuse, turning them into 'productive' members of society (instead of the losers they are right?). And at the end of it all, they get a nice fat bill for $1,200.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:01 AM
13

By an inconsequential amount in this case though.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:51 AM
11

career choices Most men don't have a choice. Earn money, support the family, or lose everything.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:49 AM
3

Hmm, news to me. The process of plea bargaining described above in relation to rape cases has come in for some criticism when faced with the actual figures for people being convicted of rape who a charge of rape is initially brought against. In certain circles it is felt that the courts are too ready to accept a guilty plea for a lesser charge to remove the requirement of proving consent. This is little consolation for the victims of the crime who have suffered such a terrible ordeal and see the…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:52 AM
3

We don't have plea deals in the UK. Not sure any civilised country expect the US does.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 08:18 PM
0

No let's go with the dictionary definition. With respect to the rights of individual, the left wing stands for: social equality egalitarianism But that is not true of feminism and western society in general. They stand only for women's rights. They are a new type of right wing.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 09:21 PM
9

The vast majority of feminists are left-wing. They claim to be. Just like violent anti fascists do. Tradcon women are sexist against men as much as feminist women are. I'd go further. Men are sexist against men too.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 08:36 PM
8

I'm sorry, but there's little evidence that feminism is either left-wing or progressive. That more reflects your gynocentrism towards women being nice and progressive. What you are alluding to is sexism against men. Everyone has it, left/right, men/women. The idea that men are disposable, that they don't matter, that male victims of any crime are worthless - that permeates every aspect of society. And it has nothing to do with people focusing only on women. People can say it's bad for women and …
/r/MensRights18/03/17 07:58 PM
2

Especially if that child has heard nothing but snide negativity about their father from their mother for all their life.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:42 AM
2

It's better to have a dad with no money than some money but no dad. Why is that so controversial? It seems almost axiomatic.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 09:54 PM
1

I think the way this kind of thing needs to be dealt with is to call it misogyny. It rests on the idea that women are more vulnerable than men and therefore need to be treated with more dignity. You can call it misandry (which it is) till you're blue in the face, but people won't listen. You call a feminist a misogynist though, and they'll at least feel conflicted.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:21 AM
7

Not just in genital mutilation but in violence in general I think when you get right down to it, the reason people believe that it's not so bad for men to suffer violence is because men are the main perpetrators. But let's break that idea down a bit: because some men are violent criminals, all men must share their guilt, and so all men are less deserving of equal treatment. If that's not textbook sexism, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:09 AM
3

It may not be pro men, but it's anti 'rape culture'. Articles like this in big papers like the Times should be applauded.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:47 PM
1

No, I've seen this all over reddit. The guy is described as an arsehole for pushing the child away, yet the wife who dragged one of the kids by her wrist and left her screaming in pain, is a 'poor woman' that obviously just fears backlash from the man. It really highlights simply how misogynistic feminists are for failing for the 'women are wonderful' stereotype, and how misandrist they are for still managing to blame the man for everything.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:55 PM
3

Because there's a market for foreskins.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:07 PM
1

Yes, this is all I see from them. What I would call misandry, they would call toxic masculinity. From their point of view, a) women are wonderful, and b) men have all the power. Therefore it makes sense to them that anything hateful directed at men can't possibly come from women, and only men have the power to cause men's suffering.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 05:11 AM
17

they're losers who can't get laid This coming from a group that believes all of men's problems are caused by 'toxic masculinity', with one such toxic element being that men are losers if they can't get laid. The hypocrisy of it. On the one hand they will say men are sex obsessed because of socially conditioned fear of being seen as a loser, and on the other they will use it as hammer to trash us with.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:33 AM
1

Hell, why not? Makes as much sense as a girl standing in the way of something representing a bull market.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:23 AM
2

Actually seems like something you'd see in an HR department.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 02:13 AM
7

That is fucking rage inducing. The woman, who is not named in the press for an unclear reason, told police that she “had to drown my babies”. Bias in the courts, yet again. Man accused? Print that fucker's name across the national media. Woman accused? Protect the privacy of the defendant.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:58 PM
6

That the mother's though. She can abandon, abort, etc.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:20 PM
13

Yeah, if only. Pretty sure that men have been taken to court for child support after fathering a child this way. It's a grey area. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2012/oct/26/gay-sperm-donor-pay-child-support-maintenance http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/10595447/Sperm-donor-must-pay-child-support-to-lesbian-couple-court-rules.html http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/doctor-sues-gay-friend-for-child-support-16-years-after-he-first-donated-sperm-to-her
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:14 PM
5

claims Only important word in the article. And even there 300, in 6 years? 50 per year with a population of 60 million? Let's put that into perspective here, there are roughly 600 student victims of violent assault per year in the UK, the vast majority being male. I expect that the number of actual homicides amongst students approaches 50 per year. It's trivially small.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 11:27 AM
6

lol at using words like facticity and informativity to make themselves seem verysmart.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 11:16 AM
7

Right, and men that end up having to pay alimony are likewise pathetic losers for not winning in court. And men that lose their children - pathetic losers. Men that get harsh prison sentences - fucking losers. On and on until you realise you stand against everything the MRA movement is for, because any time a man loses out, he is a pathetic loser. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:10 AM
13

Man as so pathetically easy to manipulate. That's because they face a large amount of misandry from society for not fulfilling the 'real man' gender stereotype. pathetic loser husband Shit like this is basically internalised sexism. You are enforcing a dated stereotype.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:32 AM
17

It's not 200 years ago though, it's now. Maintenance awards are diminishing simply because there's more equality in earnings than 50 years again, not because judges are being less generous to stay at home spouses. In cases where men are the main breadwinner, they are still getting shafted.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:30 AM
5

Holy fuck, the way you put it, HR is simply a protection racket.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:15 PM
4

It's not just liability though. They will ask questions like, "outside of work, what are your priorities in life". They do this to assess whether they think you would be a good fit for the team. Except, I'm not working with their team, and there's no better people to know if I'd be a good fit that the same team giving me the rest of the interview. And this ignores the fact that we're all professionals that do not need to work alongside people with the same drives, hobbies and political beliefs. …
/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:04 PM
8

Recognising that violence against women is a manifestation of historically unequal power relations between women and men, which have led to domination over, and discrimination against, women by men and to the prevention of the full advancement of women; As a man, I also feel dominated over and discriminated against by some men, and indeed some women. The statement should read: Recognising that violence against people is a manifestation of historically unequal power relations between weak and str…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 03:52 AM
4

I don't think the issue is with her, she's just a lone nutcase. The issue for me is that her views would be taken seriously by a mainstream media outlet without any hint of doubt. The former is a personal view, the latter suggests wider societal bias and acceptance of those views.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 04:41 PM
8

Ironically, it relies on the same misogynist stereotype that the same people fight against elsewhere - that women are sweet, vulnerable, innocent people that can do no wrong.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 04:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter