TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Graham765 Archive

View 5 posts and 45 comments by Graham765 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Repost, because the original was removed.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 04:03 PM
1

Good stuff!
/r/MensRights20/10/17 10:24 PM
2

Btw, I really think someone should create a statistic master-list. It would make debating feminists easier.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:34 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:33 PM
1

Thanks, that was a lot of info.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:33 PM
3

A lot of BS statistics in that article.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:10 PM
2

This is serious because of the inherent hypocrisy. I support the movie's right to free expression however. Dark humor doesn't bother me.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:18 PM
1

Many sexists are going to use this to demonize men, but to me it seems like the main problems are 'conformity' and 'ego.'
/r/MensRights23/12/16 06:06 PM
1

Many sexists are going to use this to demonize men, but to me it seems like the main problems are 'conformity' and 'ego.'
/r/seduction23/12/16 06:04 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights08/12/16 02:35 AM
3

I'm sorry. Here's the archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20161206064459/http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/why-an-ottawa-theatre-pulled-a-screening-of-a-mens-rights-documentary
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:41 AM
7

Please tell me that this is all propaganda and that no one here is actually stupid enough to prove feminists right by behaving EXACTLY like they accuse us of . . . . If you are stupid enough to behave like this, I want you named and shamed, and I want you to never ever be allowed to associate with anything Men's Rights related.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 04:33 AM
1

You know what, you're right. She shouldn't be let off the hook if she can't provide evidence.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 09:22 PM
-1

Go back to tumblr. Oh hello low-hanging fruit. You don't get to break a legally binding contract because you make up stories. I wonder, are you genuinely this idealistic about contractual agreements?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 09:16 PM
-1

That's an awfully all or nothing/black and white way of looking at things.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:02 PM
2

I agree, Kesha isn't helping her story by making it about her marketability.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 04:28 PM
-1

Yes, I know that's not how a contract works, but it's gonna have to be how it works in this situation, What other solution is there?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 04:26 PM
-28

If the only thing at stake here is a contract, then just let her out of it. Call it "irreconcilable differences."
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:20 AM
1

Guys, I'm all for anti-feminism when the specific feminist in question deserves criticism, but engaging in blind ideological opposition makes you no better than many feminists. Very little if anything has come out of Emma Watson's feminism. Wait until we actually have something to criticize. Also, another word of advise: within the context of an ideological movement, if you can't say something intelligently, or intelligent to begin with, you're better off not saying anything at all. Trust me, yo…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:13 AM
1

Dude, there aren't two sides to this story. The guy is an idiot. We're not going to help you past your confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 08:09 AM
1

And that's relevant to this specific case . . . how?
/r/MensRights21/03/15 08:05 AM
1

It was a class about Ancient Greek and Roman literature . . . . It wasn't the right place.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 01:47 AM
2

This has nothing to do with freedom of speech, or even feminism for that matter. The guy is an embarrassment. Don't attach yourself to this idiot.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 01:29 AM
2

From what I understand, he was chewing the scenery. No discussion was being had. I agree, these issues should be discussed, and I can't think of a better place to discuss them. However, this is not how you have a proper discussion.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 01:11 AM
2

So in other words, you're trying to oppose zealotry . . . with zealotry . . .
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:29 AM
2

His behavior WAS disruptive. Look into it more. He wasn't JUST questioning statistics.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:24 AM
1

The teacher banned him for disruptive behavior. You do yourself no favors by siding with real-life trolls, which is what this student is.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 08:34 PM
3

In-depth look and an interview with the teacher who banned the student: http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=6379 I'm inclined to agree. This isn't a free speech issue, nor was he being censored for questioning feminism. This student was a disruptive little shit who got what he deserved. Take this as a lesson, and try to be more diplomatic when spreading your ideas.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 08:32 PM
5

Another piece of advice I'd offer is to simply focus on the issues effecting males. Feminists are distractions, sometimes unavoidable because of how they've positioned themselves as constant obstacles, but still try and focus on the issues effecting men.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:56 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, many feminists deserve all the criticism they receive, but there are simply better ways to go about it.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:50 PM
4

I think you're exaggerating. You see, it's stuff like this that has people believing we're misogynists.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:47 PM
3

It should be a given, but you'd be surprised how many idiots embarrass themselves and the rest of us just spewing noise in the general direction of a feminist. You're not going to accomplish anything like that.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:43 PM
8

The most important thing, I think, is to not be a detriment. This means being polite, and knowledgeable, which means researching what you're talking about before getting into an argument.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:34 PM
2

Found this on r/feminism: http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/sheryl-sandbergs-divisive-pitch-to-leanintogether?intcid=mod-latest
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:18 PM
2

Does wearing make-up count as lying?
/r/MensRights11/03/15 06:48 PM
0

Benevolent sexism can be bad, for both men and women. Holding doors open for people is harmless though.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 06:47 PM
1

Well done, Mr.Kutcher.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 06:45 PM
2

To all those idiots who refuse to honor inspirational women on this day - do remember that it's the feminists who like to spread propaganda that conflates feminism with women, allowing them to abuse words like "misogyny" to mean anybody who opposes their agenda. Don't fall into their trap. Don't disregard women because of the mistakes of feminism.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:14 PM
1

Again, could you elaborate?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:28 PM
1

Could you elaborate?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:27 PM
1

He wasn't even convicted yet? How barbaric.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:14 PM
1

The Notyourshield hashtag was created by women, because feminists use women as a shield in lieu of actually logically defending their arguments.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:09 PM
1

ROFL.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 07:38 AM
2

Welp, there goes the whole "stay-at-home father" idea. Straight out the window. Good job, sexists.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:31 PM
2

If feminists want to make the act of lying illegal if said lie results in sex, then that's going to implicate a good portion of the female population as well. Any attempt at seduction by either men or women can be misconstrued as rape, if these feminists had their way.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter