TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GrammerNaziParadox Archive

View 5 posts and 48 comments by GrammerNaziParadox on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Exactly, the fact that someone would say all of red pill theory is irrefutable is dumb and a great way to not learn new things. Like I said, no ideology is 100% correct and the only way to get closer to perfection is to question and test what we already "know".
/r/TheRedPill10/12/16 08:01 PM
3

Hmmm, that's interesting. Obviously it's a huge leap to compare flies to humans, especially in this instance due to life length differences but it's still interesting. I've read about epigenetics before too, really interesting stuff.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 04:42 PM
2

Because I can't remove comments since I'm not a mod. If someone makes a top level comment in the thread that is a shit-post like "womyn want the badabing badaboom" then I can't remove said shit-post so it would be helpful but not necessary to have mod help. Obviously I don't need the mods but it'd make it easier.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 04:37 PM
6

I never said anecdotal information was bad, and obviously men and women want sex, otherwise none of us would exist right now. However, to go deeper it's useful to cite scientific studies instead of just speculating based on anecdotal evidence. Without citing actual papers, much of the stuff here will remain psuedo-science even if it's on the right track.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 04:35 PM
4

The theories and concepts here are irrefutable. If you honestly believe that then you're an idiot, no ideology is 100% true. Stop being lazy and examine society around you and you'll see all the proof you will ever need. Firstly, accepting everything trp says as irrefutable fact is as lazy as it gets. Secondly, the whole reason I'm interested in trp is because I have seen empirical evidence that supports some of the points made, which is why I want to take it to the next level with actual studie…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 04:33 PM
8

It's funny that liberals glorify being different and rail against 'body-shaming', but the moment people are different from them politically they're the first to shame them.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 02:16 AM
-7

Despite the click-bait title, easily the best post I've read on this sub-Reddit.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/16 07:16 AM
1

Think of you future and what you want from it, most of the time it requires good grades. Think of good grades as the key to open the door of success (as cheesy as it sounds).
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 06:23 AM
1

Computers win at chess through being able to calculate more outcomes than their opponents, thus they have a bigger pool of possibilities to optimize. Regardless, low iq jobs will be phased out more widely by computers before it happens to high iq jobs, I guarantee it. You can cherry-pick all the examples you want, but all you have to do is look at the past (factories are now practically all automated etc.) to see where the future is going and the trend robotics is on. Talk to me in 30 years and …
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 09:14 AM
2

By high iq, I meant conceptual things and logic. Obviously a computer can do math/calculations faster than a human (which is all you need to win in chess of you have the computer power to instantly do all possible outcomes).
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 08:00 AM
3

It will take longer than that. Is technology growing exponentially, yes, will the time difference be that small? No.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 07:14 AM
2

You're right that it will be interesting to see how society reacts when low iq jobs are made obsolete by robots in the coming years, but I think a robot takeover is a bit unrealistic.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 05:52 AM
2

He could have said "dressing provocatively increases the chance women will be raped", not that they're "asking for it." Phrasing it like that almost seems intentionally inflammatory, like a click-bait article but in argument form.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 05:14 AM
3

Because living our life in total fear is a terrible idea. Obviously I'm not going to walk in a bad neighborhood with my Rolex on, that's unnecessary risk, but that doesn't mean I should never wear it for fear of being robbed, or when I go to a bar because it shows status. There is a balance to be struck here. Girls should be allowed to dress provocatively if they want, but for goodness sake if they do dress that way they shouldn't get too drunk or go into bad neighborhoods due to unnecessary ris…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 05:10 AM
16

What the fuck, they aren't asking to be raped. However, they are increasing the likelihood they will be raped. It's like walking in a bad neighborhood with a Rolex and very nice clothes. You aren't asking to be robbed, but it increases he likelihood you will be robbed. If I had a daughter I would just tell her to carry pepper spray, don't go to bad neighborhoods, but if you have to walk through one dress modestly so you don't draw unwanted attention to yourself.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 04:54 AM
12

Women care more about social status than power. Don't project what men value (power) onto women. Also, no offense, but what you said about financial guys is not true at all. My dad is a hedge-fund guy so when I was younger I would meet his co-workers etc. They, especially the bosses, have a shit-ton of gravitas. They are literally working with billions of dollars split among a few dozen guys that could all vanish in a moment, not to mention they have to deal with the extremely wealthy investors …
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 02:14 PM
5

Status>Game>Looks>Money Even if you have terrible game, you can still do well with women if you have a high social status. Game only becomes important when it's the only thing that distinguishes you from the men around you.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 02:01 PM
1

You can always do whatever you want, no one is forcing out to pursue high value women. If you are satisfied with the current level of women who are attracted to you then who cares what your social status is? This post is for men who want to attract higher value women, in fact all of trp is meant for men to attract higher value women than they are currently getting. Personally I won't be entirely satisfied until I have a 8 or 9/10 wife who is a good rp partner. Does this mean I will be working on…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 01:14 PM
2

While this can be true, it doesn't hold 100% of the time, for example Bill Gates has amazing social status, but beta game (just look at his wife). Furthermore, what most people miss is that the inverse of what you said is even truer, that good game creates high social status. This is truly what matter for the people on this sub because most of us do not inherently or naturally have high social status (otherwise why would we be here), we have to cultivate game in order to increase our social stat…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/16 12:40 PM
2

Suddenly the recent change in tone of their political articles makes sense.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/16 07:33 AM
1

Yeah, I actually didn't mean to respond to your comment (intended to make a new one).
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 09:02 PM
1

So you're saying men and women are separate but equal?
/r/TheRedPill19/02/16 03:16 AM
1

Many women fantasize about rape simply because in the past, rape was a common part of warfare, in tribes, kingdoms, empires, and even nation-states. Even if you look at baboon groups having battles the females are often captured by opposing males and forced into their harems. The women who resisted rape enough to make it not happen were killed and thus naturally selected against. The ones who resisted, but not to the point of being killed were selected for. Thus, it makes sense that women would …
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 08:33 AM
-7

Yeah, I'm going to have to call bs on this one.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 02:09 AM
1

"The two are explicitly separate", no, most red-pullers advocate use of frame, dread game etc. to manipulate women when in reality practicing all that shit doesn't really matter, is pseudo-science at best, and honestly creates a lot of over-thinking on our parts and toxicity where there doesn't have to be any. The only thing that matters when it comes to one-night stands and short-term relationships, which are what most frs etc. are about, with women is looks. If I go into monk mode for half a y…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 03:17 PM
1

My point is that frame, dread game etc. are not important to smv, and that looks constitute the vast majority of smv. I see a lot of guys on this sub thinking that girls fucked them because they're in-shape, bust also because they used these trp tactics on them when the real reason is that they now have a six-pack when they used to have a beer-belly. Like I said, correlation does not equate causation.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 03:06 PM
1

"I am better at dodging drinks than feminists are at dodging logic" lmfao, nicely done.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 08:23 AM
12

This sounds like it happened.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/16 02:51 AM
1

Lol
/r/askTRP20/01/16 09:00 PM
1

Can't be fixed with a patch, trust me on this one.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 06:31 PM
1

Lol
/r/askTRP17/01/16 06:30 PM
1

The lazy eye is actually a result of a surgery I had to correct a detached retina I got from a blunt trauma injury. I actually tried getting a third eye surgery to correct my double-vision and lazy eye, but the vision is so fucked in my right eye that it isn't going to happen (trust me I've tried literally everything).
/r/askTRP17/01/16 06:29 PM
4

Thanks man, I really needed to hear this.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 09:01 AM
2

Same man, if I hold eye contact for more than a moment my lazy eye becomes obvious, so I also go with the brief, intense eye contact. I guess I'll switch to prolonged though, just to see if it's better, one less thing on my mind too.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 08:42 AM
2

lol perhaps, unfortunately the lazy eye is from an injury so the vision is very poor.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 08:39 AM
0

It's not deformed, if I focus really hard I can make it look straight and no one would think anything of it, otherwise it's just pointed out a bit. Wearing an eyepatch is unnecessary.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 08:37 AM
1

Fair enough, so maintain eye contain despite the fact that it makes me seem uglier?
/r/askTRP17/01/16 08:35 AM
2

It's not that bad lol.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 06:23 AM
1

Unfortunately surgery isn't an option (not a money issue).
/r/askTRP17/01/16 05:41 AM
6

"Intellectually destroy him" lmao, you sound like a neck-beard. Also, why the fuck would you game another guy, because you were jealous?
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 06:40 AM
2

So true, it's amazing how differently women treat you when you're high smv vs. low smv.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/15 07:37 AM
2

That's the problem with being Machiavellian, you'd don't develop any real relationships.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/15 07:14 AM
1

Satire.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 08:32 AM
3

Exactly, I also saw someone point out on another thread that advertising on Reddit becomes a public image liability to potential and current advertisers if their ads could possibly be associated with a sub-reddit as toxic as FPH, so "bad" subreddits like FPH negatively impact Reddit's two sources of revenue, the user base and advertisers (although the user side is more important because ad revenue is more reliant on it than vice-versa).
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 06:29 AM
2

Enjoying victim-hood and circle-jerking are not mutually exclusive.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 09:10 PM
70

It's also about satisfying their main user base, and since Reddit users in general are pretty liberal, anytime something like FPH or TRP hits the front page they get angry because these posts oppose their views. It's like if Hillary Clinton had a 15 minute time-slot everyday on Fox News' prime-time, the people watching would all be pissed because they are conservative and would consequently start watching Fox News less and reduce Fox's profitability. Anyways, the Reddit owners want to keep their…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 09:07 PM
6

It's also about satisfying their main user base, Reddit users in general are pretty liberal, so anytime something like FPH or TRP hits the front page they get angry that anyone could possibly disagree with their world view. It's like if Hillary Clinton had a 15 minute time-slot everyday on Fox News' prime-time, the people watching would all be pissed because they are conservative. The Reddit owners want to keep their revenue resource around, the users, so they have to appease them by weeding out…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 08:46 PM
1

It's just a commercial, no need to get so offended. Both /r/MensRights and /r/Feminism need to calm down and take a joke.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter