TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GranaT0 Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by GranaT0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Homer Simpson was a subvertive character in a cartoon for older audiences, sitcoms and family shows just started copying the joke until it stopped being one
/r/MensRights01/12/25 02:11 PM
-1

It means flirting with and getting to know someone
/r/MensRights28/05/23 03:10 PM
-2

Yes, you're the idiot for thinking I'm simping, because it makes no fucking sense. Cope, "normal" "man".
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:25 PM
1

Eh, I'd say I'm below average but I've been "talking" to multiple women at times too. Confidence is the real difference maker. That being said, I've never bothered with dating apps. That shit is designed to lower and milk your low self esteem.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:23 PM
-11

Simping for whom, you fucking idiot? She doesn't even know this post exists. And if deception was her focus, why would she straight up tell him what she did on their first meeting? Stop seething about randoms you don't even know. OP provided information, you chose to ignore it and get mad.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 12:03 PM
-26

OP said what she said. Did everyone just miss that? It's pretty stupid to just assume something like that about a person you know nothing about.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 11:21 AM
-7

He said what she said, but people in this sub are eternally mad about mundane things. Talking to multiple people when you're trying to find a date is perfectly normal.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 11:20 AM
-60

OP said she was talking to 4 other guys, not that she was actively dating them. Huge difference.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 10:19 AM
16

But he's not a men's rights speaker, he's a figure who just happens to have some views we agree with. And I sincerely doubt those views are why people have a problem with him.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 08:25 PM
-31

How is this related to the sub?
/r/MensRights19/09/22 07:32 PM
2

My bad, thought it was a removed comment not a removed post
/r/MensRights16/10/21 02:25 AM
5

Check the comment with reveddit to see what they actually deleted before we all get worked up over nothing?
/r/MensRights16/10/21 01:24 AM
5

I'll have another read then, I must have been skimming the paper too quickly. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction
/r/MensRights01/06/21 02:19 PM
-2

Fuck off, I've been subscribed here for years. I'm just trying to discuss the data presented instead of circlejerking about the topic itself. It doesn't say 5% did IAPT, it straight up said 5% did psychological therapy, while the other "services" included in the 91% figure included unemployment services and the justice system. I just wanted to understand what I'm reading because the subject is important to me.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 02:07 PM
-3

In the last section they say only 5% used psychological therapy.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 01:37 PM
-1

It says 5% in the document. Was that a mistake?
/r/MensRights01/06/21 01:10 PM
7

They analysed thousands of victims. Pretty standard for a scientific study.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 09:17 AM
-7

According to this study, only 5% of the men engaged in psychological therapy, and the 91% engaged with "services" which include unemployment services and the justice system? Am I misunderstanding something or is this not proving what they say they're proving?
/r/MensRights01/06/21 09:14 AM
8

its hate speech It's a name a specific group of people are/were calling themselves. You have some very thin skin.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 12:20 PM
-23

Don't be an idiot, he's just sharing his opinion and not being confrontational with anyone or acting like he's objectively right. People are allowed to disagree with you.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 12:35 PM
3

Yeah OP, it'd be near impossible not to wake up, and it sounds like something your ex made up, that's probably why your wife doesn't believe it
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:13 PM
2

Absolutely true, it's disgusting how little support there is for men. However, this shouldn't be an argument against helping women with rapists. It should be something we fight for, not just bring up as rebuttals. Both causes are worthy of attention.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 08:32 PM
2

Yeah 100%. Some people really go way too far trying to justify their beliefs. Still, it's not wrong to say women suffer much more from perverts - over 6 times more female victims of sexual assault according to FBI, who don't use broad scopes.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 08:14 PM
1

I'm pretty sure you're talking about that really dumb one with like a 97% victim rate
/r/MensRights18/03/21 06:46 PM
2

I said isn't just rape
/r/MensRights18/03/21 06:45 PM
0

Fair enough, slight difference there, but sexual assault is what I had in mind. How is it misleading? Sexual assault isn't just rape, sure, but it doesn't even include awful stuff like unwanted touching or kissing.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 06:03 PM
1

https://ucr.fbi.gov/nibrs/2019/tables/pdfs/victims_sex_by_offense_category_2019.pdf You've been lied to. These are FBI crime stats. 12k male, 100k female victims.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 05:52 PM
1

https://ucr.fbi.gov/nibrs/2019/tables/pdfs/victims_sex_by_offense_category_2019.pdf
/r/MensRights18/03/21 05:51 PM
-2

So zero evidence for your claim, and the outliers noteworthy enough to be published make up "most college girls"? All I'm asking is to not present personal opinion as fact. Also it's not 30% that have been raped, but 30% that have been sexually harassed. That includes a bunch of awful stuff more common than straight up rape.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:50 PM
7

Most College rape is drunk girls feeling bad about making poor judgment the night before [citation needed]
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:06 PM
0

FBI stats say 16k male and 100k female victims for 2019 Edit: 16k, not 12k
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:05 PM
2

Can you link those FBI stats? Because the ones I found say 16k men and 100k women were raped in 2019.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:04 PM
1

Same has been said for George Floyd. Other men of other races were killed the same way he was, but only his death sparked outrage. Its not about who's the victim, its about people having had enough.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:20 PM
-1

He wasn't the only person killed this way.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:02 PM
-6

Fair point, it's just that a lot of the actually sexist and ignorant comments often get a lot of upvotes here just because people agree with the general sentiment.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 06:58 PM
-9

I've been subbed here for a long time but it's definitely heavily biased.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 06:46 PM
-8

There it is, thanks!
/r/MensRights28/09/20 02:14 PM
-9

Could you use a couple more buzzwords please? I can't subscribe to your ideology until you're not thinking for yourself at all.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 01:45 PM
2

Everyone's a victim
/r/MensRights27/03/20 10:55 AM
-1

Would you refuse a free drink from a gay guy?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:29 PM
3

I think it's about straight men going there to try and sex lesbians?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:06 AM
1

The article says rape must involve penetration with a penis. This is about UK, not US.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:42 AM
2

I don't think so, being raped by a woman still requires her to be penetrated, no? I'd say it actually doesn't include female on female rape if anything.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:52 PM
1

/r/juxtaposition
/r/MensRights21/10/17 07:28 AM
1

Google pulls word definitions from other sources
/r/MensRights05/02/17 01:05 AM
12

That's not what it's about. Abortion should be allowed, but expecting a man to pay a lot of money every month for the next 21 years because a woman decided so shouldn't.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:07 AM
2

But it doesn't rely on anything shown later. It can easily be a one shot.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 07:09 AM
6

It's not bad at all, not sure what his problem is.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/17 11:45 PM
1

/r/likeus
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/17 01:23 AM
1

I've never heard anyone ever call a woman a dick. Dick is for men, cunt is for women. Equality.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:25 PM
1

Oops, sorry.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:31 PM
1

I was saying you're making a lot of baseless assumptions, which, on this sub specificially, are completely wrong.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 11:20 AM
1

That's some damn fine projecting.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:11 AM
7

The fuck, reported for what? He didn't break any laws.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:10 AM
11

Just one year, actually. Apparently the age of consent in Texas is 17 (which is pretty high).
/r/MensRights06/05/16 06:09 AM
8

Don't want kids? Don't have sex with men. Not the kids' fault you don't know how to control your vagina.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter