TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GrandEmperorThrawn Archive

View 0 posts and 10 comments by GrandEmperorThrawn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Imagine letting a woman go through your phone, for any reason, ever.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 02:45 PM
1

In this context, the text you're quoting loosely translates to "use what you got, get with the times, and face the challenges of the modern dating world." To directly answer your question, the occasion would be the modern dating world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/22 02:26 PM
1

I did say "most" to allow for personal opinions and subjective interpretation. But wanting to "return to a better time" is a fantasy on par with Disney romance. Life has a forward momentum that can only be embraced by accepting the now. Nothing is stopping you from applying the Americana charm to modern dating methods. But as a society, we aren't going back.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/22 02:19 PM
53

Disagree. You gotta hard-core romanticize the past to think most points were better than now. It's different. It's more competitive. But we have also have access to more information, tools, and options. Use it and rise to the occasion bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 01:40 PM
1

I suppose that depends on what kind of safety one prioritizes. If one prioritizes sexual health and guarding emotional investment against expectations, probably best to assume no agreement means your partner is non-exclusive to you at first. If it's the social stigma of hurting someone or the potentially violent or emotional consequences thereof, I can see why one might default to implied exclusivity. Monogamy would be a great standard if everyone lived it, but it gets problematic because many d…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 02:20 PM
2

If there's mutual consent and actual agreed-upon boundaries, I wholeheartedly agree with that. That is as it should be: clear and honest. However, I do not accept monogamy or sexual exclusivity as the default unspoken agreement of a relationship. Unless otherwise mutually agreed upon, a person's consent is not required for activities in which that person has no part.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 06:19 AM
2

No, I'm quite serious. Please elaborate as your comment doesn't seem to be related to mine in any way and I'm curious about the connection you're trying to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 04:01 AM
1

You monogamists are funny. "Confess", lol. I come home and brag about it to my wife. Then we high-five while you live in denial of human nature and damn those who embrace it as evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 12:06 PM
1

You’re right but not for the reason you state. “Nice guy” is usually code for emotional manipulators who are bargaining for sex (i.e. I did 10 nice things for women, I’m owed sex now) and wish relinquish all responsibility for cultivating positive qualities in themselves and for themselves which is what genuinely attracts women. Or to put in a less harsh way, think about who you are independent of women in your life. You wouldn’t be considered a “nice guy” in this context because there’s no one …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 04:49 PM
2

I think there many who thought as you did and failed. The red pill originated from collective knowledge of these failures. If you are successful dating without this knowledge, you’ve probably internalized the lessons that others need to be taught and here to discuss. If you stay, remember to learn the lessons of others and put this knowledge into practice for yourself; don’t fear it and don’t let it dissuade from being a good person. Always remember that men and women are complimentary to each o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 06:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter