TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GrapeCulture69 Archive

View 1 posts and 285 comments by GrapeCulture69 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Social IssuesGrapeCulture69/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:18 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

And by all statistics, black people are the most dangerous racial demographic. Would you then be in support of non-black spaces as safe spaces for other races?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 06:06 PM
0

Fuck no. Pull out game is strong af. Plus half the time it turns into a nice facial/swallow, so it's a win-win. I love being a degenerate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 05:30 PM
2

Condoms are disgusting
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 08:32 PM
1

You should check out the racial preference study for dating (google that phrase). It's really insightful about the racial preferences. Pretty much everyone prefers their own race, but I believe the strongest in-group preference was with black women preferring black men. Even if you don't want to read the study, at least check out the chart.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:58 PM
2

I'm confused about what you mean about the difference in dating white girls and different races. I've been in LTRs with every major racial group and in the end, they are all the same when it comes to love. Sure, they have different cultural values, like Asian chicks are more loyal and won't flirt with other dudes, and Mexican chicks are crazy in bed, and black chicks are very sensitive to men showing weakness, but overall, women are the same at their core. I don't see race being that big of a di…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 04:52 PM
1

I bet you get more attention than the average 18 year old guy gets from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 06:26 AM
2

Yeah, this is a really fair perspective. I genuinely hope the exposure therapy works out for you too.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 06:05 PM
8

Many people apply this same ideology towards black people, for the exact same reasons. I don't blame them/you, but I disagree with the ideology, regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 04:28 PM
2

What if we changed this whole discussion to the increased likelihood of whites to be victims of violence by blacks? Some types of violence being over 100x more likely to be black against white than white against black. Pretty similar to the discussion of males harming females compared to the other way around. Would you hold the same perspective and be accepting of the formation of a similar prejudice/avoidance in the white victims? Also know that I don't ask this is to judge you either way. I do…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 04:15 PM
1

You're creepy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 04:57 PM
1

You're proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 06:37 PM
3

Yeah, we aren't religious, so we aren't married. And we both don't want the government in our personal lives, so we didn't see the need for a legal marriage either. She's the beneficiary to my life insurance (my assets are in trust to the kids) so if I get killed, she won't starve. Plus she'll be done with college next year and starting her own career anyway. Probably match my salary after a couple years...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 07:31 AM
3

Because you're personally offended by the concept. You're looking for an outlet for your feelings and a place for validation. Good thing I live my life for my best interest, and not the feelings of other people. Jaded women (and men) are worn out, bitter, and lifeless. Not the kind of people I want to spend my time with. Of course young people can be the same. But I'm just dealing with probability.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 06:20 AM
3

Makes me feel good that you're threatened about my situation. That's the only reason you would take it personally and stalk my post history to come up with a personal insult. Who's the sad one?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 06:16 AM
2

My experience is the exact opposite. People don't place enough value on it. I started dating my life partner when she was 18 and I was 26. Been together for ten years. I got the good fortune of being with a woman in her physical prime, having babies in that time (but not having to rush to have kids), being with an energetic and fun person, being with someone who hasn't been fucked out and jaded by the world, etc... I got everything I could ever want. I also ignored disgruntled old/fat/feminist w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 02:59 AM
1

So you ask for sources, disregard information, then refuse sources when I ask? That's not a conversation, that's you being defensive. Also, I'll make my statement a little more wordy, since it was confusing. "Poor people from intact families produce, statistically, more successful offspring. Broken families, from higher income levels, still produce less successful offspring." Should have been "poor people from intact families do better than from broken families. Broken families from higher incom…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/20 01:23 AM
0

Kids pick up on emotions. If you're parents are 'malcontent' that emotion will effect you negatively. Also if you're parents are unhappy then that will make you unhappy by proxy and can manifest into your own mental health issues. Source? And evidence that this is what's happening in marriages? Source? https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1044&context=hilltopreview There are plenty if you want to search around. It's no longer politically correct to say…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/20 01:02 AM
1

To be honest, I don't have a figure what constitutes a high n-count. Instead, I just focus on a low count. So, for instance, my gf (she's basically my wife, just not legally) had an n-count of 2 when I started dating her and she was 18. Even if I didn't know the number, their behavior is going to tip me off to the same thing. It's not like I ask every girl how many dudes she's sucked. I can tell she's promiscuous or not after a couple days of talking. If she's promiscuous, I don't want a relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 11:47 PM
2

Personal experience with those type of girl, yes. My impulsive behavior is just what exposed me to impulsive girls. And while fun, I always felt bad for their husbands and boyfriends that they were cucking. Exceptions exist with every rule, but I would rather play my odds right and avoid those types. Only and idiot denies a lifetime of experiences, and ignores the odds when making a decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 11:30 PM
0

All children of divorced parents experience antagonistic behaviour between two parents. Literally never once between my parents. I didn't even know about my mom cheating with the guy who ended up moving in with us, until I was like 16 or 17. My parents kept everything secret. Who knows what the norm is though, but my story was the norm with other kids going through divorce when I was a kid. No fighting. Just malcontent people. Even if kids are experiencing that antagonistic behavior with their p…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 11:20 PM
0

Sure, but statistically speaking the kids from divorce are much more likely to have fucked up lives. That's definitely a downside to divorce, regardless of the upsides. Not surprised that people that can't make a relationship work, also can't make kids work (i.e. become good adults). Not all, obviously. Just a higher likelihood. On the happiness subject, I feel like we don't know what makes us happy. I think we know what brings us pleasure. But pleasure and happiness are completely different. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:20 PM
1

My meeting got postponed, so I read the study. It's great work, but still disappointing since it used college students, and didn't have a scale for promiscuity. Just a binary. It's still super informative and I appreciate that it brings up emotional promiscuity. It think that's a topic we need to discuss on here more. I'm curious if women look down on emotionally promiscuous men. Maybe it has already been discussed though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:16 PM
1

Aren't people more unhappy now than they were in the past? And more mentally ill too? Not relating that to divorce, but you said that lots of people were happy. Divorce is bad because of the impact on the child. Giant correlation with criminal behavior, mental health issues, violent tendencies, school discipline, etc... Broken homes suck. I say that as someone who grew up in one (because of infidelity, as it turns out) and I was a fucking train wreck after the divorce. I'm in my middle 30s and h…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:02 PM
0

Also, that second study looks promising, but I have a conference call rn, so Ill have to read it later.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:49 PM
1

Yeah, I suck at reading statistical analysis like this too. But anyways, on the religion topic. I'm pretty much atheist (but don't deny that a creator of some sort could exist) but studies like that make me wonder if religion was right about things like cohabitating before marriage. See, we are assuming that religious people are less likely to divorce/chest, and less likely to cohabitate before marriage, but what if the cohabitation before marriage, by itself, leads to a higher divorce/infidelit…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:45 PM
0

Cool study. Especially interesting about the cohabitation before marriage part. 5.16 times the likelihood of infidelity... I still want to see a study that isolates male infidelity and previous sexual history. Controlling for religion would be great too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:31 PM
7

To simplify it: impulsive behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:22 PM
2

Correlation does not equal causation. I don't think any of us care about the cause of the cheating. We are just calculating statistics. Normal people will prefer statistics to be in their favor regardless if it's a correlation or proven causation. I still want to avoid the group with a high correlation with behavior I am trying to avoid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:20 PM
1

Were these general statistics, or were they based on past sexual history? I'd like to see the stats for men cheating based on their sexual history. And I'm always curious how accurate any of these studies can be, due to the issue of self reporting. Like with fat people reporting their caloric intake, but they are actually taking in double that amount.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:16 PM
5

I have a high n-count and prefer women with a low n-count because I know what comes with the high n-count. Plenty of chicks have told me they thought my sexual history was gross. They still fucked me and dated me though. I definitely downplay my n-count for relationships. Significantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 07:46 PM
1

100% agree. I wouldn't feel normal if I was doing the traditional make chores around the house. But I can't assume evrry guy is pulling his weight in the same way. Or they just outsource it with gardeners, mechanics, and repairmen.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 08:39 AM
0

Lmao sorry, I completely misunderstood your comment. Yeah, they are pretty much complete opposites. It's even funnier that you mentioned height, because I'm tall and I look pretty stupid bent over the kitchen sink. I can see my girl judging me whenever I do. The only reason I mentioned splitting wood, is that OP didn't mention the type of chores, so it really wasn't a good post. Outdoor chores are a constant where I live, but maybe he lives in an apartment or something. With a maintenance worker…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 07:07 AM
2

You think they are equal in terms of masculinity? Every girl I fucked thinks otherwise, so it works great for me. Men doing masculine shit will turn normal women on. Not the ones that are threatened by masculinity. Well, some of those too, but they won't admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 06:49 AM
1

Of course. Everyone is different. Only hitting one position is boring to me, and we can each pick our finisher position too. Not everyone appreciates variety, and that's their business. Lack of female participation is boring to me too. But obviously some people will like that as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 06:17 AM
1

I assume you're referring to traditional female chores, and the answer is a clear "no." But keep in mind that a woman who is exhausted and overburdened/distracted by endless chores isn't exactly going to be horny either. Masculine chores, like fixing/maintaining stuff around the house/cars and doing yard work will definitely turn a woman on. When I cut and spilt firewood, my girl will try to fuck me before I can even shower the filth off. If I were to do dishes, instead, she would be completely …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 05:57 AM
2

Thanks man!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 04:56 AM
2

Oh definitely
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 04:55 AM
1

Yeah, I'm trying to save face about being right all along and you dodging my points through the thread. However will I recover?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 04:54 AM
2

Lol I might go against my political philosophies and vote yes for that one...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 04:27 AM
2

I wasn't the one saying see was starfishing. And my comment is that it's a sad looking sex life when a woman doesn't participate in it. It's barely any different than starfishing anyway. I would never stay with someone like that. Not sure why you're so butthurt about it. If you don't like girls who participate, you don't have to. Attaching that to the concept of submission is retarded though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 04:24 AM
1

Nah, we take turns. Neither of us are lazy when it comes to sex. We both like to explore and put in the work to keep things interesting. I'm clearly the dominant one, and we both prefer that, but the physical effort gets split up, at least. I fully recognize that our nature leads to her submitting to me. I just don't attach laziness to submission. Or accept it, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 04:14 AM
6

All the time. I want to kidnap people and train them to be stronger, like on V for Vendetta. Most people won't even take basic, obvious advice, so I stopped caring and just stick to feeling bad for them. Just for an example (skip if you don't want to read a long story), an old co-worker of mine, who is still a close friend, slowly became morbidly obese after we met. 13 years ago now, when I was interviewing for the job. He uses to be somewhat of a ladies man. Very charismatic, decent looks, masc…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 04:00 AM
3

I agree completely. But submission is different than laziness though. My girl submits by sucking my dick for 30 minutes, not laying with her mouth open while I jack hammer her face. I mean, she does that too, but I prefer her to do the work. She submits by doing what I want, not by not doing anything at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 03:34 AM
2

Lol it's obvious now that you say it... So you ARE lazy. I tried to ask if you didn't like burning calories (i.e. lazy) but you said it wasn't that. If being lazy is what you like, then it is what it is. There's plenty of times I don't even have the energy to fuck and just take a blowjob instead. Not a crime to be lazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 03:26 AM
2

What's "in quar" mean? As far as your comment being "controversial" I think guys are going to be annoyed anytime a woman sounds like she is lazy, since most guys have to do most of the work with sex. I don't find it controversial, just unappealing. Not that you give a fuck about my opinion on your preferences, but clarifying for the point of our conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 03:19 AM
3

Ah, then I did genuinely miss that one. Hard to tell over text, and I don't know her personality at all. And I know sex itself is way easier for women, if they want, but I've maybe has sex with two chicks that wanted me to do all the work. The rest were way more into it, even if they were doing it as a show for me. I still appreciate the effort and the enthusiasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 02:59 AM
3

How is a non-participant part of the female biological imperitive? Are you saying that it's normal for a woman to just want to lie there and get railed?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 02:54 AM
5

Yeah, i definitely wasn't criticising her, personally. It just sounded sad. I hit like 5+ positions every time I have sex with my girl. It would feel weird not having an active participant. Like, rapey, weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 02:52 AM
10

What they are attracted to and what they're capable of fucking are also two different things. "I was hungry for a burger, but at this point, I'm starving. I'll eat pretty much anything that is technically food." That should sum it up for the ladies, since I'm sure they have felt this a few times.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 01:57 AM
1

No matter how ugly and fat a chick is, some dude will fuck her. But for me, I have unfairly high standards. Like I couldn't continue relationships with girls that put on more than ten pounds. Or i wouldn't even fuck a chick if she has the slightest of muffin tops going.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 01:51 AM
4

I think it's sets unrealistic expectations for love for most of the little girls watching these movies. Considering most women are going to have to settle for a dude that is nothing like the guys on the movies. Just like young boys watching porn, then growing up and fucking fat chicks. Same kind of disappointment. Who cares though? Let them feel disappointed with their lives. That's the reality of our species. Most people will live a life of disappointment. As long as I don't have to hear about …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 01:24 AM
1

Ah, I didn't think of that. Alignment would be messed up if the heights aren't right. Guess I've just dated the right height chicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 01:19 AM
11

That's super depressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 01:18 AM
2

Try it sideways
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 01:16 AM
0

Is it an insecurity, or you just don't like burining calories?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 01:15 AM
7

Froggy. On her belly, legs spread, my legs pinning her legs down and open, my mouth at her neck, hands relatively free.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 01:13 AM
1

It doesn't matter if I'm just fucking them. I can cover a beer and burger here and there. Doesn't affect me, but also, 99% can cover it themselves, so I never really had to. As far as relationships go, I put income pretty low on the list of things I care about. As long as she works and contributes what she can. I'm going to live the lifestyle I want to, and if she can cover bills, it's a plus. Just not the highest priority. For instance, I pay for my gf's side of the bills right now cuz I want h…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 08:57 PM
4

Which part? The high income or the type or career? I wouldn't look at this as a negative, personally. I'd take full advantage of the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 06:13 PM
1

Not sure whose comment you are referring to (I can't see the upvotes on the post above mine) but I don't think the general public is being represented on this forum, and both of us made more statements than just about tats and piercings. And we weren't in direct disagreement either. The point is some of those things are universally accepted SMV standards. Maybe closer to universal for relationship standards though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 05:09 PM
1

It's all about maxing to be more pleasing to women, instead of making women jumping through the hoops to win over men. This is mostly true, but when a guy learns to do it right, he CAN make women jump through hoops to keep his interest. Like any of the relationships you have been in where the girl was way more interested, and you were trying to get out of the relationship. You can sort of recreate that without being a complete asshole. Basically dread game, but tone it down or keep to the lower …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 05:00 PM
1

Not sure if I FELT used, but I was definitely being used when I slept with chicks who had boyfriends/fiancees/husbands that I didn't know about beforehand. A few dozen at this point. It's kind of annoying since a few of them were girls I was planning on dating. And almost all of them were willing to keep fucking, but I just couldn't do it since I felt bad for the dude, and grossed out by the idea of double dipping.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 09:21 AM
2

Happens when anyone tries to "play cool" and pretend they are not interested, projecting an air of detachment Maybe if it isn't authentic, but 100% of girls I wasn't genuinely interested in (beyond sex) and was legitimately detached from, would chase me with full effort and develop unreasonably high feelings for me. It always made me feel like shit and would make me cut things off way sooner than if they would have been cool with keeping it casual. The girls I poured my effort into responded the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 09:08 AM
1

To me, RP is about understanding women I think a better way to put this, is that RP is about understanding relationship dynamics as a whole. Not just the female side, but pointing out the male side. As in, our flaws, owning up to our mistakes, being honest about ourselves and our true feelings, etc... Which is important because society has brainwashed us into a completely false reality, not only when it comes to women's nature, but our own. We put on such a fake persona to deny our biological in…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 08:53 AM
2

Cool, thanks for clarifying. As a junkie (I'm currently sober and plan to stay that way), I pretty much assumed that about women's standards, but wasn't sure about guy's standards. Especially considering drug use was always a draw for me, since it meant I wouldn't have to hide my drug use.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 03:18 AM
2

I tried my best to answer just now, but feel free to reply to my answer if there is more I can clarify.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 03:08 AM
2

If this is about you, you should be able to do a pretty simple evaluation of basic things. Like are you in shape, young (in relation to who you are looking to attract), do you dress well, groom yourself well, have symmetrical features and no deformities. If you are basing your SMV on how much you get approached, then you aren't getting an accurate estimate. The amount you get approached has a lot to do with the scenes you frequent, how approachable/friendly you look, if you are with guy friends …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 03:05 AM
1

Does the drug use turn you off, even if they don't look strung out?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 02:54 AM
13

Are you saying that tattoos and piercings lower YOUR sexual attraction to the girl, or that you believe she is inherently a lower sexual value, society wide, because of those things? The reason I ask is that I know tons of guys that are attracted to those things. Personally, I have the same standards that you do, but I don't think all of them are objective or universal, relatively speaking. Being fat and unfeminine are relatively universal, or course.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 02:52 AM
1

I don't think it's entirely genetic. I think plenty of environmental factors go into forming an alpha or beta. Childhood can really mold a person. I know this goes back to the classic nature vs nurture argument, but I've always been a firm believer in both being absolutely relevant in a person's development.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 02:35 AM
2

Do you have some examples of guys advocating violence on that sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 02:30 AM
3

Same reason tons of dudes in the gym aren't in shape. It takes time AND they might still be doing it wrong. Also the red pill rage you are discussing is still those guys shedding their blue pill ways. If they are still mad about human nature, they aren't really accepting reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/20 02:21 AM
1

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 08:59 PM
2

So you're going to ignore everything I just wrote and then restate your first point? That's not a discussion. A person foregoing the resources they could get from selling it, and choosing to manage it in exchange for rent is them still earning it. Not to mention all of their other earnings they used to acquire the property. You don't get to gatekeep what level of effort constitutes "earning" just because Marxism tells people it doesn't count, and that ideology has seeped into our culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 07:12 PM
1

Our entire economy is funded from people's paychecks, so your statement would mean that no one is earning anything since we are all living off someone else's paycheck. And a landlord earns their rent when they spend their own resources acquiring that property, then spend time, money, and effort maintaining that property. And take that risk to begin with. Then forego the use of it, or sale of it, in exchange for a monthly payment. By every metric, they are earning it. Just like if I wanted to let…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 06:13 PM
25

Yep. Just like at any of my jobs where a management level person fucks up, a bunch of new rules get dropped on the front line workers. Sometimes even exempting the management. I don't have any understanding of the thought processes that go into these things, but I can recognize them as absolute bullshit still.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:24 AM
1

You shouldn't put up with it IF it's obvious manipulation. The hotter chicks will just be more effort because they have higher standards. In general. If the hot chick is trying to game me, I would just cut her loose or game or even harder, depending on the mood I was in.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:19 AM
1

I never had any sort of preference for "hard to get" women. It was more like the higher value ones were naturally just more effort, because there was more competition for them. And/or the lower valued ones were just easier because they were more eager for a better deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:16 AM
2

Not sure about the wholesomeness part (not disagreeing either) but gen Z is obviously way more focused on personal development than my generation. I'm pretty sure you guys are going to be way better people than millennials. Despite the narrowing attention span lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:13 AM
1

Yeah, I can understand that too. Just thinking that any group that actually encourages personal development and community service is impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:09 AM
1

Sounds like you picked a great sorority, regardless of the difference in the times.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:04 AM
1

Yeah, I think the OP definitely has issues of his own. But body count has some pretty clear correlations, so I understand being concerned about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:03 AM
2

I reject women who wear tons of make-up, and that's my right. And it's also their right to reject ugly guys. It's not hypocritical to want to be with someone who is better looking. Make-up is definitely a dishonest approach to displaying your looks, like a guy wearing boosters to appear taller. But that doesn't negate either persons right to try to pull a better looking partner. I made sure to see any chick I wanted to get anything long term with, without make-up so I knew what I was getting int…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 10:00 AM
1

The first time was in the early 2000s. Just before political correctness hit the scene and changed it to what you described. I was half joking about your college life sucking. I know the changes were made after some really tragic stories were made public. Most of the changes were completely reasonable. And some of the things I did with those guys (I never joined, just partied with them) were seriously fucked up, like the vandalism sprees that were way beyond the prank level. I'm in California, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 09:53 AM
1

I've always wondered this. I'm not sure if a study can actually pinpoint the answer though. On one hand, I was a damaged person who actively engaged in the hookup culture and it fucked my life up even more. And on the other hand, plenty of the chicks I hooked up with seemed completely normal, then freaked the fuck out when they realized I didn't want to have a relationship with them. It's hard to tell if they were crazy beforehand, but they sure as hell started acting crazy to me after the hooku…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 09:47 AM
0

You're college life sucks then. Mine was exactly like the B-rates movies. Many more FFM threesomes than MFM spitroasts though. For me personally, at least. But I've seen plenty of the spitroasts in my days... Fraternity and sorority hazing was legit too, not abusive. More focus on drinking though, than personal attacks like the marker story in this thread. The "whaling" thing one frat did to haze was super fucked up though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 09:37 AM
4

Not saying OP is right or wrong, but parents should absolutely be concerned about the choices their kids make with their bodies. I'm not going to encourage my son to by an impulsive manwhore, or use abuse drugs. I want him to do the best that he can with his body. I can't control every aspect of it, but I don't want him to be a fucked out junkie like I am. Hopefully he can understand the consequences I faced for my stupid decisions and be able to make better ones for himself. As opposed to my pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 09:21 AM
1

Can you give an example of anyone in the manosphere that recommends violence towards women? I'm not referring to being okay with men being allowed to defend themselves against a woman's violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 07:24 AM
1

But you had to work harder to get to that job. It wasn't like there are endless amounts of them that anyone can get. They have way more people competing for them and much higher education and experience standards than a warehouse worker. Even with that being said, the high paying office jobs are still harder in a lot of ways, than a warehouse job. The difference in responsibilities makes a huge difference on the amount of mental effort you put in. Physical effort isn't the only measurement. You …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 02:45 AM
1

I don't understand your comment about landlords. What property are they trying to get without consent? They own the property if they are the landlords. But yeah, people fixated on politics aren't usually the type to do well in the world. They waste their energy complaining and arguing instead of trying the make the most of the situation. Like I know western society is falling to absolute shit and is declining is countless ways, but I'll spend my time profiting off of it and finding ways to still…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 02:40 AM
1

I couldn't disagree more with your last statement. Sure there are people that are born into good fortune (pretty boys or rich kids) but the majority of guys have to try to get ahead in this world. Nothing is just brought to them. I don't know you, but it sounds like you are mentally defeated. I can absolutely guarantee you that you can dramatically improve your position in life if you want to. If you have a certain deficiency (a physical or mental defect) you can still improve based on what you …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 02:35 AM
6

An alpha mindset doesn't guarantee anything, but if you have the underlying prereqs covered, you will get a hell of a lot further than if you don't. It's still better to be a go-getter, regardless of the prereqs. Alpha minded ugly and stupid guys will typically still be more successful that omega minded attractive and intelligent guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 05:26 PM
1

So annoyingly true.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 05:20 PM
18

In my experience, it's the exact opposite. Every single guy I know that consistently fucks ATTRACTIVE girls is not a collectivist in any way, including with fiscal policy. They tend to be selfish (not necessarily in a bad way) people who recognize that they need to earn things and others don't need to provide it for them. That alpha mindset makes them successful in life and with women. The guys that cry about wanting other people's property without consent or earning it, are the same that cry ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 05:19 PM
4

How does one reconcile calling themselves a libertarian who thinks the government should subsidize hookers and sexbots? Did you realize that r/libertarian has been taken over by far left socialists? There's some weird trend now for leftists to claim to be libertarians, but still adamantly support large government programs. And want even more of those programs. I stopped wasting my time arguing with them. If someone claims to be a libertarian, but as asking for more government (past what the cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 05:11 PM
1

Yep. And it feels exactly like a competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 07:58 AM
2

Fucking insane. Funny thing is that you can't even tell these stories to most people without them getting pissed at YOU. Or blaming you somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 07:50 AM
5

I've seen this kind of thing a million times. And experienced it plenty, myself. As they get older, the tactics get even scarier, like threatening suicide, stealing one of my guns, threatening to make false domestic violence accusations, fake pregnancies, making up stories to get me fired, etc... Never a single consequence for any of them for this kind of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 07:29 AM
3

Completely agree. I could tell hours of stories about super abusive, crazy stuff that that women have done to me because they were interested and I was not, or wasn't interested anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 06:44 AM
2

"never say no and when you have to say no, do it without ever using the word no." I think you are being completely dishonest about this. This is a line from hostage negotiators.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 06:42 AM
1

Why would a woman be getting approached by a man in a private place at night? Like a home break-in or something? That seems a little unusual. Pretty much all of men attempting to pick up on women, in real life, is happening in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 06:40 AM
4

More than once I have been hit or harrassed for turning down a female A fat chick straight out slapped me in the face once for declining her offer for sex lol. I was super polite and passive about it too. She's was screaming at me and calling me a pussy. Completely sober too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 06:36 AM
2

This reminds me of people that are so afraid of getting in a car accident, that they actually cause one by driving like shit. Unreasonable fear tends to cause way more problems than it could ever solve.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 06:30 AM
11

I've genuinely never once seen a guy get angry about being rejected or not getting a woman's interest. I've definitely seen butthurt, but literally never once have I seen actual anger. I've seen women get seriously angry AT guys for showing interest (probably isnulted that such a low value dude thought he had a chance) but never what you describe. Personally, all of the rejection I have experience either made me laugh, made my self esteem dip a little, or gave me zero reaction at all. This appli…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/20 06:24 AM
1

But how much of that is because of lack of access so they are being forced to settle? I'm not referring to fetishists who actively seek obese women. I'm talking about guys who don't have enough game or value to pull an attractive woman so they rationalize their sexual needs and start to find the overweight women attractive. I'll put it a different way. We all desire clean drinking water, but if muddy water was the only thing we had access to, we would rationalize why the obviously less appealing…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:55 PM
1

I think a vast majority of women that are bothered by this are overweight and not sexually appealing, so porn lessens their sexual access/interest of their men. We have something like a 70% overweight rate, so of course men will want to watch porn of healthy weight women, and of course their sexual needs are lessened by the satisfaction from porn, so they show less sexual interest in their unattractive wives. It's not on me to say those men don't deserve an outlet. I couldn't imagine being in a …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 09:49 AM
1

Do you make the same considerations regarding consumer purchases? As in, do you reference the labor laws of the source country of the products to insure that they coincide with western standards regarding labor and exploitation? If you do, I genuinely commend you. You would be the first I've talked to. But like with porn, the standard American produced stuff is far from exploitative. They follow strict laws, sign contracts, agree to payment, and clarify rules ahead of production. I can see havin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 09:30 AM
1

Are men's standards actually lower than ever, or are women more unattractive than they have ever been (highest overweight rate in recorded history) so men are forced to settle so that they aren't celibate? Or is there really a difference in what I am saying and what you are saying??
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 09:02 AM
2

This could explain my sex life then. I never understood why every chick loves rough sex. It kind of annoys me when I don't feel like putting in that kind of effort. But maybe that's the type of woman I attract. Or am attracted to...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 08:57 AM
1

Not sure what you would define as early, but I lost my V to my gf at 15, went on to have a high n-count, numerous convictions, and a decent amount of my body covered in tattoos. Definitely have issues with impulsivity. So I probably fit your narrative pretty well. I still valued a low n-count though, because I know very well what comes along with the high n-count. That impulsivity it a relationship destroyer. And when it's both partners, the relationship is doomed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 07:55 AM
1

So if it follows a known negative stereotype, is what you are saying? But if it's a general insult that isn't typically assigned to the group by prejudiced people, then it wouldn't be an issue? If so, that would make perfect sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 07:10 AM
2

Obviously my anecdotal experience couldn't singlehandedly disprove your theory, but I'll explain my perspective to keep the conversation flowing. I lost my virginity at 15. I was also a late bloomer, so I was actively rejecting girls' sexual advances as a young teenager. Even when I lost my virginity at 15, I really wasn't ready and my gf basically bullied me into it. She was older and had been sexually active for years, so she wasn't taking "no" for an answer. But from there I went on to develo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 07:07 AM
1

That person is a bad representation of a woman. Women aren't usually like that It's kind of funny how we see this the exact opposite way. I see your point though. You're addressing it as an exception, while I would see it as demeaning to the group. Just a matter if perspective then. What if you heard someone say "greedy Jew" or "lazy black person" instead of "shitty woman?" What's different about these types of phrases that would make them prejudicial as opposed to pointing out an exception to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 06:46 AM
0

Not sure why you're addressing website coding only, but that field, in general, has a lot of high income earners. I work for a small company and all of our coders are making six figures. No exceptions. The one guy on my team with a master's in CS is making $145k and not doing anything high level. Just front end work and occasionally a python script or two to help with database queries or sorting of large scale data dumps. If I didn't hate coding, I definitely would have gone that path, just for …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 06:15 AM
2

One, attractive and normal women, between 18-30 are a pretty low percentage of women. Two, a lazy woman would look at 70k a year as a free ride. She can take on any easy job (or no job) if she wants, and still live a comfortable, middle class life. But to address your OP, I'm certain that it's both. Women want attention AND financial comfort. A BB can easily provide both to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 06:08 AM
1

About 19 or 20. I went to high school with her and she peaked in early college. She hit the wall a bit early (late 20s) but that might be because she developed early (she didn't grow one bit from when I met her freshman year, so she was 14) or because she partied hard. What's funny is she used to fuck me in highschool, but when I met her in college (she would come back to town during holidays) she acted like she was too good for me. These days she doesn't even talk to me if we see each other in …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 06:02 AM
1

Not going to itemize my reply, because we are basically in agreement. I'll address the "shitty woman" question though. The reason I, personally, don't identify the identity group when I identify a person's bad behavior, is it puts off the appearance of a personal prejudice towards that group. Which I do my best not to have. Even reminding myself not to identify the group will help keep me from forming an inherent prejudice towards the entire group. I can identify risk factors of a group (like yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:46 AM
2

We’re not the ones killing and raping No disagreement there. For instance, I look out for men trying to rob me, and women trying to manipulate my money out of me. Guess which one causes me to be at a higher level alert in my daily life? And guess which one is basically just a novelty or even a funny challenge? Men and women are just different kinds of threats, in general, but men are obviously more likely to be the violent threat. Denying this is just bad survival skills. Here's my question for …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 05:13 AM
1

TRP isn't a hive mind though. It's just an ideology. That ideology doesn't say a woman is a slut for having sex with her boyfriend. Not saying that a bunch of beta losers aren't all over that subreddit, making comments about a girl being a slut for ever having any sexual contact. But that isn't the RP ideology. It's their own hatred or insecurity. Plus, everyone has their own personal definition of what constitutes a slut anyway. To me, it just means that she will fuck me without commitment. So …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:54 AM
1

Banter amongst friend is absolutely a shit test. Guys test other guys shit constantly. They want to make sure their friends are solid people and aren't so sensitive that they can't be honest or even playful around the person. I avoid guys that can't take a joke or talk some shit back. They don't make good friends for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:49 AM
4

I hope the same for you as well. Cheers!
/r/MensRights11/04/20 04:44 AM
3

Lol exactly what I expected you to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:42 AM
1

This makes no sense. Associating blanket psychological platitudes with a person's state of existence is inherently prejudicial. Depends how you define prejudice, but if I described the mating habits of dolphins, no one would call me prejudice. They would recognize that I'm just describing those habits. Dolphins tend to follow the same pattern. It is what it is. In TRP terms, not really... Because that's just part of their nature, as you say. Getting mad at a woman for doing shitty things is like…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:41 AM
5

Believe whatever you want. But reality isn't on your side here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:24 AM
1

See, I don't look at TRP as trying to moralize the actions of women. More like explain why women's actions and nature are good or bad for that specific guy. Women being hypergamous is bad for guys that can't make the cut. So their option is to improve or look for an even lower value woman. And it's good for guys that DO make the cut, because she didn't give herself over to some loser that wasn't worthy of her before the valuable guy had the chance to lock her down. Personally, I think women's na…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:17 AM
1

Somewhat in the educational system, but nothing like the legal system.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:12 AM
2

And if she only has sex with guys that are committed to her, she is neither a slut, nor a prude. It's not all black and white.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:10 AM
2

That's literally the core concept of TRP. That you will make decisions based on what suits you best. Then explaining to men WHY they aren't the best decision. They have the choice to learn and improve, or be a raged out loser that never gets any pussy, and complains about women making decisions based on what they feel is best at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 04:06 AM
1

There is a difference between a red piller and someone following the tenets of TRP. Like the difference between a Christian and someone who actually follows the specific rules of the bible. This applies to every ideology, so the point is to argue about the ideology, not the individuals who follow it. I've had to explain this same principal about Muslims ever since 9/11.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 03:59 AM
2

I think the red pill material definitely covers male nature and addresses what guys need to change in order to become suitable mates. Then they teach the men about female nature so they can be less autistic in dealing with them. Like preparing for a job interview as opposed to rolling out of bed and hoping to get easy questions thrown your way. We teach less intuitive people how to present themselves AND what to expect from interviewers (standard questions, appropriate responses, what the interv…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 03:57 AM
2

How do you personally define prejudice?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 03:44 AM
3

So true. Some of those posts and comments on TRP are cringey af. Doesn't make the core ideology suddenly wrong though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 03:44 AM
4

The argument is not that they are good or bad as WOMEN but good or bad as people. As women, they just are what they are. Their nature just is their nature. Being mad at that is like being mad at a fly for flying. If women do shitty things, they are shitty people. Like if you found out a black person committed murder, you wouldn't go "see, he's a bad black person" you would just say that he is a shitty person. Our identity groups just are what they are. If you're stuck in specifying the identity …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 03:42 AM
5

TRP doesn't represent our society as a whole. It's a tiny fraction of our population. The vast majority of our society takes women's side with everything they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 03:28 AM
1

That just means other people are equally as confused about the red pill concepts as you are. I read their posts occasionally and a lot of their content goes against some of the basic things I've read in the side bar. I would only consider side bar material to be the tenets of their system.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 03:26 AM
6

A woman isn't a good woman if she DOESN'T do this. Our species was only successful because women were gatekeepers to reproduction; making sure the strongest men reproduced the most. Of course, sometimes strength meant rape, but ignoring that part of it, women are supposed to make sure a dude that's trying to fuck them isn't a complete waste of space. If it wasn't for shit tests, we would just be another jungle animal in the middle of the food chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/20 03:21 AM
17

100% correct. Guys should be complimenting their guy friends. The obsession with not looking gay is fucking stupid. Coming from the middle eastern community, where I hug and kiss my guy friends and we sit, while touching legs (gasp) the idea of being called gay for common interaction just seems weird to me. Or caring about being called gay is even weirder. Guys: listen to this girl. Compliment the good things about your guy friends. Boost their self esteem every once in a while. It might not mea…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:22 AM
1

Saying weak things is still weak though. Having to watch what you say is a basic concept of dominant communication. How you present yourself physically and verbally will always leave an impression on people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 06:38 PM
1

An evaluative skill is something you have to practice and experience. Like I can't teach you how to fight over text. You just have to train and practice. But there are obvious pointers we can share about both concepts. Like if she talks a lot about exes and dudes she's been with, or if she has a large number of guys that she talks about dating. And generally the way she treats men in front of you. These are all signs to pay attention to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 06:34 PM
1

No one has any source of any of this. We are all discussing based on gossip. Even the figures we are discussing are speculative. Including yours. The explanation of hidden assets would be the only way to explain how a settlement could go past 50% of KNOWN assets. Either the true asset value was much higher or the totality of the hidden assets are being awarded to the guy ASSUMING any of these figures are true. It would make this conversation super annoying if every single one if us repeatedly sa…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 06:27 PM
1

All of the discussion about this divorce is speculation, including this article. No one has a reliable source. Just discussing based on what has been said about the situation. Basically we are discussing this as a theory. The critical theory being discussed is obviously the financial dynamics of divorces.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 06:52 AM
1

Sure, but my answer was about how they can still be that. You can be disgusted with a trophy wife just like a wife can be disgusted with many aspects of her husband. My point was that they aren't mutually exclusive. I'm sure most of the men marrying those women have very little respect for them. Probably treat them like property, instead of with genuine love and affection. At least the alpha type men. There will still be plenty of beta types that will push their disgust down and rationalize thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 06:50 AM
3

The meaning of "trophy wife" is to have an attractive woman that you get to show off. Like a trophy. Kind of degrading, but trophies don't hold any true value, other than to show off. So these guys marry these women strictly to look cool. And they also probably get some sexual benefits (or imagine they will) they wouldn't get from normal women. Also, plenty of BB will go for them too, just like with any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 05:12 AM
2

As far as caring goes, women who have slept around a lot end up having much higher divorce rates. Anyone looking for a stable partner that is less likely to cheat would care about not having a woman that has blown 200 guys. As far as finding out goes, asking is probably the last thing a guy should do. They won't get a reliable answer most of the time anyway, but it makes them look weak, regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 05:02 AM
1

Have to agree here. The question definitely shows weakness. And if a guy can't figure out if a woman is a slut after talking for a few days, then he has poor judgement and evaluation skills. So, weak again. Weakness and poor evaluation skills aren't going to help a guy get laid/a relationship/a wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/20 05:00 AM
2

I read some statistics a while back saying they are the most murdered group, the most suicidal group, AND the most homicidal group. Also, they were more likely to commit murder than be murdered. Makes me think we are addressing the situation in a very wrong way.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 04:42 AM
1

Applying equality of outcome to your first example, this would mean that every student gets the same grade regardless of performance or effort. Also, the second example doesn't guarantee an equal outcome either, as people can't/won't use those same services, and/or get the same benefit from them. It's actually another example of equality of opportunity. Sorry if I'm being pointlessly argumentative, but I've spent a lot of time thinking about the logistics of equality of outcome. Happy to chat mo…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 04:28 AM
5

The settlement was based off her hiding assets, which Bezos didn't do. She lost all of the assets she tried to hide. Probably lucky she didn't face perjury type charges for it. And I think anyone being rational can recognize that Adele got fucked over in the divorce. I've talked about dozens (maybe hundreds) of men being fucked over in divorces and the general public, and rulers of our society, don't give a damn. When it happens to a woman, there will naturally be more outrage, but this is good …
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 04:21 AM
2

And when the pass doesn't work out, it means they are being treated the same as males. Are you intelligent enough to understand that or do I have to break it down even further?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:57 AM
1

Agreed. Divorce courts are bullshit. This is a denial of the pussy pass because divorce courts typically let females get the upper hand on account of their sex. In this instance (and what looks like a growing trend) her sex did not give her a pass, in regards to bullshit divorce settlement decisions.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:54 AM
6

No one wants revenge. This is the exact same treatment that men receive. Which, by definition, is equal.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 10:18 PM
4

Again, no one is saying two wrongs make a right. They are saying it makes things equal for both sexes. That's basically the point of this entire sub. Females being treated the same as males.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 10:16 PM
3

That's absolutely ideal, but completely besides the point. If an unjust law exists it should be applied equally regardless of identity group, or else the law will never be properly addressed. As more and more women are affected by obviously bullshit court standards for divorce, the entire system will be given attention, and ideally be made into a fair system. If the system only harms males and rewards females (as it historically has) then it will never change.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 10:13 PM
34

No one here is saying it's fair, they are saying it's equal. As in, courts fuck men over every minute, so when a court does it to a woman, that's equality.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 09:22 PM
7

It won't help the anger, but it will save you money on replacing controllers and screens. I'm probably down about $5k lifetime from smashing my own shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 03:47 AM
3

she always said she didnt like men with big muscles Very often this actually means "I don't like this type of guy because I can't control my attraction to them, and they always have power over me in relationships."
/r/TheRedPill17/08/19 04:47 PM
5

Just curious, was she not what you wanted, physically, or more than that? I got fatfished recently and I'm still bitter about it. It's genuinely dishonest. She used outdated and edited pictures (that I noticed in retrospect). Wondering if this is the new standard now.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/19 07:45 AM
1

You're trolling if that's what you think I said. You asked how sand can get in genitals. I gave you two examples. And you disregarded one to try to belittle me with the other. You aren't being genuine here at all. Regardless of what you say, hygiene was a driving factor in pushing circumcision in areas that were dirty af with very little access to water.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:16 AM
1

Dirt or sand can get in your genitals by being in and around your clothes. Have you even been in a legit sandstorm? That shit gets everywhere. Add sex to the equation and it's worse. Ever have sex on the beach? Sand gets in everything. It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:10 AM
1

Why don't you think we can win that fight? It's growing in popularity as it is.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:08 AM
1

What are you talking about? When did I say that?
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:04 AM
9

I don't think it's the only battle that can be won, but it is definitely the best one. Equal custody is the other winnable battle.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:49 PM
1

Wrong. The genitals aren't exactly the same so they will experience different issues. Also women ARE circumcised in that part of the globe. Sand DID get into the ass and vagina, and clothes were mandated to help deal with that. A religious requirement can have multiple reasons. The US is the only place widely doing it for non-religous, anti-sex purposes.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:43 PM
1

My understanding is that it helped with infections and not getting dirt/sand clogged up in the genitals.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:38 PM
4

I experienced exactly this, last week. I was picking up take out food and was talking with a young, attractive, mom in the line about her young kids (both present), and the guy behind us, brought up his kids (not present). We told stories, laughed a bunch, talked about how great family is etc... I look over and see an obviously angry woman staring at us with pure rage. She looked to be in her late 40s, substantially obese, no wedding ring, sitting alone with way more food than necessary. She det…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 07:26 AM
1

Women might abuse the system, and just scream rape if their bf/husband won't abort give up custody, and just pay full child support.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 06:59 AM
2

Start a new bank account that she doesn't have access to and start sending your income to it. Take her off of your credit cards or take yourself off mutual ones. Separate phone plans. Separate anything you two share financially. Do it all asap. Then prepare for break up however you think is best. Always protect you finances first or she will leave you homeless. Guaranteed.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 06:49 AM
8

Feminists don't want to work with MRAs, they want to control them.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 06:43 AM
2

Well when those people lived in a desert with no ability to bathe, female and male circumcision made sense. Religions were just trying to protect their people. Religions need to modernize now and adopt proper principals for today's life. I know I'm asking too much though...
/r/MensRights08/04/19 06:39 AM
5

Well the government is doing a piss-poor job...
/r/MensRights26/03/19 03:43 AM
3

"Let's be real, SHE, almost certainly enjoyed it." Imagine saying that about an underage girl. Even though it is often accurate, it's just gross and weird.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 03:41 AM
4

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_%26_Gamble_brands
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:46 AM
3

Their parent company is Procter and Gamble: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_%26_Gamble_brands
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:45 AM
27

quit being a bitch, and instead, let people treat you like a bitch to show how manly you are
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:24 AM
5

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_%26_Gamble_brands
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:21 AM
6

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Procter_%26_Gamble_brands
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:21 AM
1

Nah, I'll stay and keep calling you out for defending pedos. I just really hope you don't have access to little boys. They don't seem to count to you when it comes to molestation. You can get help, you know.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 04:42 PM
1

I get to decide how obvious your defense of pedophilia is. So IF you don't want to be viewed that way, don't act that way. Otherwise, don't be surprised when talking like a pedo gets you called one.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:01 AM
1

Then don't write words that lessen the seriousness of pedo behavior. Easy fix.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:50 PM
1

They don't need to, but everyone I hear trying to justify/excuse something, are usually in support of it. I hope I am wrong about you, but you still seem to be trying to excuse sex with male children. Of course there are differences amongst the sexes, including females having sexual development and desires earlier than boys, but I see no legal or moral difference. I see women as extra pedo (not a criminal standard, obviously) when banging boys, but all I want is them to be equally punished compa…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 05:16 AM
1

Acting like there is a difference between the adult women and adult men having sex with children sounds an awful lot like pedo talk. I may be wrong though. However, the difference between the sexes is that girls mature much quicker (2-3 years quicker) than boys so the it is much more pedo for people to have sex with young teenage boys as it is to have sex with young teenage girls. Girls begin having sexual desires prior to boys, on average. Society suppresses female sexuality though, so they kno…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 04:44 AM
3

Found the pedo
/r/MensRights13/09/18 07:29 PM
4

"If you were a Mexican, you'd be going to jail." How would that go over?
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:22 PM
-7

Thanks pumpkin
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:11 AM
2

Oh, for sure. You nailed it. I'm all the things you called me, and more. I'm pretty much a serial killer too. Off to find my next victim now... ;)
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:04 AM
-7

So I can't love someone despite their flaws? My nephew is a pathological liar and I still love him. I just know that I have to watch his actions, not his words. I have lots of girlfriends, and I love having them in my life. I'll never wife any of them because they are all liars. I still have tons of fun with them and never abuse them in any way, shape, or form. Everyone wins,
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:09 PM
-3

Even the best women in the world will lie to you to make themselves look better. I haven't dated a single woman that hasn't lied to my face. Lies I could prove were lies in a matter of seconds, but it doesn't stop them. I love women. In general, for many of their traits, but honestly sure as hell won't be one of them.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 07:58 PM
3

Where are you at in the custody process? Have you applied, or do you have, any physical custody of any of your kids?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:59 PM
11

You are going to court to gain physical custody, right? Do you need any pointers on navigating that system. All my friends and family have been through it.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:28 PM
1

Careful even with LTRs, since in some states/ countries the feminists occupied governments are starting to label LTRs as de-facto marriages. Asset splitting, alimony, even child support for kids that aren't yours. Know you laws, and definitely don't cohabitate.
/r/askTRP21/08/18 08:13 AM
2

Seriously, I respond to tons of shit tests (including the questions about sleeping around) with mom-fucking jokes. It's my lame version of humor and after a few giggles back and forth, they eventually stop asking because they keep getting the same dumb answer. Results may vary.......
/r/askTRP21/08/18 08:05 AM
2

If they are gonna fuck, they will fuck. They'll just sneak instead if you don't "let" them. He probably wants to fuck her, but just hasn't had the chance. Ask yourself something: why can't you be there with them? What possible issue could he have that requires you to not be there? Why can't they be in public? No reasons, except him wanting to fuck her. Don't just let some dude fuck you girl. Meanwhile appearing possessive, needy, or jealous would make you look beta. You have to leave it to your …
/r/askTRP21/08/18 07:56 AM
2

High school parties are bad. Banging 18 year olds is natural, and good. Unless you are looking for legal trouble, avoid being around juveniles breaking the law. High school parties are nearly never all 18 year old seniors.... Just do what u/redpilllibertarian said.
/r/askTRP21/08/18 07:43 AM
22

Bro, she is under your skin and gaming you hard. You are in her frame right now and destroying yours. You need to orotect your career, for one, and protect your self-respect. Next her with the least amount of effort possible. Just distance yourself, hide your butthurt, and if she forces the talk, she deserves nothing but a short reply that you can't keep fucking her. Any explanation or closure is your DEERing or failing shit tests. Treat it like a magazine subscription (outdated reference, I kno…
/r/askTRP21/08/18 07:28 AM
10

Kind of a side note, but always save texts/communications with chicks you fuck/date and store them, encrypted, somewhere safe. Men get accused of rape a lot at college when they piss chicks off. Evidence of consenting sex/relationships that you secretly keep until you need, might save your career/life. My storage files have a folder for each girl, then a separate folder for sex videos/images and another for communications. I'm not even in college, just like protecting myself and saving dirty mem…
/r/askTRP21/08/18 07:14 AM
5

Try Facebook and Instagram. Unlimited sources.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:25 AM
4

Actually, if you engage in sexual acivity, yes. Imagine a new trend of men saying they were banging their roomates just to gain a financial provider.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:15 AM
1

Just change your own life and try to influence those around you. That's what matters. I live my own way of life, saying "fuck you" to tradition and feminism. I date multiple women, fuck whoever I want, pay for no one, and live a very free life. That's our power. No change of rules can stop me. And I've influenced dozens of men to live my way. Ripple effect.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:11 AM
2

Because then they can opt out and go homeless. Laws like this force men to work under penalty of imprisonment (or death if they fight/escape imprisonment). Edit: but yeah, your second suggestion seems like the ending point of all these efforts.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:57 AM
1

We can avoid most of it though. Don't ever live with a woman that makes less money than you. Don't ever impregnate a woman that makes less money than you. Don't ever let a woman be a "stay at home mom" if you get her pregnant. If you follow those rules, it's much harder to be divorce raped and forced into labor by your government. Or only do casual relationships with women. I'm enjoying that lifestyle, personally.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:52 AM
6

That's not even a joke, it's the next logical (illogical?) step for those thieves. Eventually it will just be "assumed a husband-like role" like they use to force men to pay for women's children if they built any relationship with the kids in any fatherly way.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:49 AM
1

Good plan. Best of luck to you bro!
/r/askTRP20/08/18 02:23 PM
1

Yeah, but referncing them in the Nazi database system just to figure out how to contact them was still a pain in the ass. The game is/was so hard......
/r/askTRP20/08/18 06:46 AM
8

I came here just to make one quick point: every time the kissing starts getting too heavy, she pulls away You're doing it wrong. Get the kissing going, then YOU pull away. Don't push for anything, make her want more and make her come for it. That's the secret to not only getting laid, but also not getting metooed. Also, her making you wait doesn't make her high quality. It makes you low(er) quality in her eyes. If you were a celebrity, she wouldn't have waited...
/r/askTRP20/08/18 06:40 AM
5

That paying money for blue balls is lame as fuck. Plus, we can see unlimited porn on our phones for free. Use the money on real hobbies or full on hookers.
/r/askTRP20/08/18 02:50 AM
8

Some corporations sell you products with materials gathered from 3rd world slavery/indentured servitude. We should do our best to avoid them, but not abandon all business engagement on the concern of potential abuse.
/r/askTRP20/08/18 02:48 AM
3

Then regret is when ur car gets broken into... Kidding though, I prefer to work for it too. That's just my ego controlling me though.
/r/askTRP20/08/18 02:45 AM
0

I mean, you failed (at fucking her) but didn't completely fuck it up. You could have recovered. Meanwhile, if she really wanted you, she would have put the effort in to seeing you. She was/is lukewarm about you. Instead of tossing the number, you could have recovered with a "let's go to (Whatever Bar) at 11 this Friday. I'll even pick you up if you're nice" type message. Not verbatim, of course. Have your own style. But something assertive and direct, and then if it doesn't pan out, move on to t…
/r/askTRP20/08/18 02:41 AM
2

This is just your turn with her. She isn't your property. She probably gave a dude at the fistival a quick turn with her too. Some other dude will have his turn after you. Don't be butthurt or shocked. Don't have a "talk" with her. Just move on mentally. Ffs, you will never know is she cheated or not. Who cares. Reduce her to a plate, and go enjoy life. Never sit and stress about what your gf might be doing. Nearly all women will cheat, and you can't control it. Let that shit go. Distance yourse…
/r/askTRP20/08/18 02:28 AM
1

I'm open to discussion on the amount of time. Maybe 3 years is more reasonable. Maybe not. What I know is unreasonable is women being SAHMs when the kids are school aged. That's insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/18 04:14 AM
3

The sense that a man insisting on being a woman's sole privider while she hardly contributes (imagine when kids are school age) to the family makes the man a beta buck and a plowhorse. Send them to work, collect the benefits. Don't just become a better plowhorse.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/18 04:12 AM
1

Well I disagree with that idea regardless of who is presenting it. I never noticed TRP community seniors actively being against women having equal rights or working, but I'm not a supporter if that is the case. I'm sure beta lurkers and noobs showing up are butthurt and hate women, but they shouldn't be the prominent voice of the red pill communities. Shouldn't be....
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/18 04:11 AM
0

Nice. I love seeing those tables getting turned every once in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/18 04:07 AM
6

Bro, I cook and clean and it takes hardly any time. These duties are so easy, literally children do them. No one needs a person to stay at home full time to do it. Meanwhile, women, like men, are going to cheat if they feel like it, but being a SAHM gives a lot more time for boredom and cheating. I don't think sending women to work prevents divorce, but it prevents men from begin robbed in divorce court. True beta bucks want to slave away to give their women a comfortable lifestyle. That's fine.…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 08:45 PM
-1

Then I guess the moms need to get good jobs and contribute equally. That's what equality is about. Not about extra privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 07:14 PM
0

Stay home until the yougest is a year old or so. Then daycare or nannies. Not hard to do. Unless someone keeps cranking kids out as an excuse to not have to go back to work. Welfare queen status. Also, every woman in my family.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 06:33 PM
1

Oh, I am sure you are right. I can imagine it improves all kinds of areas of one's life. Relationships are one of the hardest things to properly maintain, so I'm sure self-improvement is essential. My relationships in my blue-pill days were a disaster too. I got force-fed my red pills...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 05:59 PM
0

I just posted something pointing this out too. My efforts of self-improvement aren't to be a better husband (read: plowhorse) but are to be able to have sex with as many different women as possible before I die. Getting married would ruin everything I have worked hard for.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 05:39 PM
0

I emulate the TRP version of Chad as best I can, and I did so before knowing wtf TRP was (thank you African American culture for teaching me The Game as a kid). I personally don't care about marriage or LTRs and I establish my success as a Chad based on how much casual sex I have. Marriage is a pretty anti-Chad move anyway. I'll never make that mistake and I got snipped to make sure no one can make it for me. Your vision of Chad may not exist, but mine does, and I'll enjoy a long life of sleepin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 05:35 PM
17

The irony is that is about as beta of a mindest as possible. Like men are supposed to be women's caretakers and then wonder why they get divorce raped. Any true red pill man will have his woman working for a living. Being a SAHM is fine for first year of a kids life, but after that, it's just milking a free ride.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 05:14 PM
4

Read that sidebar on theredpill. Your mindset will change. It's part of waking up to our reality. Or you can take that blue pill and stay asleep. But don't expect anything to change in your life...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 04:14 AM
9

Go the r/theredpill and start reading the sidebar. You weren't given great life lessons, so unfortunately a drastic shift in your way of thinking might be necessary. In the meantime, do what Mr Smoogs said, and take women off of the pedestal you are putting them on. They are your equals, not your superiors. Don't worship women, just treat them like normal, everyday people. Our whole society already worships women. Don't add to it. Also, go develop some hobbies like exercising, sports, lifting, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 03:03 AM
3

Manipulation becomes a requirement when you are dealing with manipulative people. Most women are manipulative (every one that I have met, and that's not an insult, just an observation. There are good biological reasons why manipulative behavior developed in women) so a man looking towards self-improvement needs to learn the manipulation game. Or get manipulated into misery...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/18 12:46 AM
1

had retaliated against her, including leaving her out of meetings and avoiding eye contact Imagine that. People don't want to stare at someone who makes false accusations. How dare them........
/r/MensRights17/08/18 09:12 PM
2

Yeah, I saved that other person's post for future use. Pretty solid collection of links. And I am sure that the religious aspect is the largest hurdle at the moment, but, like you, I find it odd that female circumcision managed to get banned all over, but not male circumcision ever. To me, it means that the Jewish community has more power in the West than the Islamic community. The strategies involved, IMO, are the simple involvement of people's preference towards the female sex. Anything bad ha…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 09:19 PM
2

First off, thank you for being genuinely interested in a discussion. That is a bit rare around Reddit. I have these links from a recent saved post that provide studies indicating some of the downsides to circumcision. I'll paste them below. My personal concerns on the issue are that the medical industry has literally lied to us about the impact the pain of the procedure has on babies. Lasting trauma can't be identified in words because they are too you, but psychological harm can happen prior to…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 05:10 PM
2

Thank you for your support. Do you support anything else on the men's rights platform? Just curious.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:53 AM
3

I completely agree. Treat it like any other property at that point. Property has to be split or sold in a divorce...
/r/MensRights13/08/18 09:07 PM
6

Cool, thanks for clarifying. I didn't see that in our post thread, so I was curious where you stood. I was born in the Middle East where both male and female circumcision were normal, although it was much more common with males. I just can't understand people who agree with it for one sex and and not the other. It's insane to me.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:47 PM
9

Should parents be making that decision for females as well as males? Both are "healthier."
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:40 PM
9

That's what women often say about their circumcisions. It's a very well supported practice in the Middle East and North Africa, and women are the primary ones pushing the practice. Plus it really makes the vuvlas look better. But do you really think we should do this to unconsenting children, or maybe let them choose later on in life?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:30 PM
14

Same with female circumcision then? But just the kind that removes skin folds that are unsightly, and can lead to poor hygiene and extra infections? I'm not disagreeing with you, just looking for consistency.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:25 PM
21

I have never once seen a feminist actually advocate for the rights of males. They, at best, will tell males to abandon their masculine ways (except the ones that serve women) and to adopt more effeminate roles in the world. Literally never once have I seen a single feminist truly advocate for helping males with the problems that they overwhelmingly face. Their organizations actively fight and campaign agaisnt any changes that men try to make (shared parenting as default, for instance). I don't h…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:12 PM
1

Lmao you're sick. Proud of you....
/r/MensRights13/08/18 06:56 PM
8

There are only two reasons a woman would cheat on you. One, is that you weren't treating her right. The other, is that you were...
/r/TheRedPill13/08/18 06:30 PM
2

Even to a fat, old smelly woman who doesn't shave anything?
/r/MensRights13/08/18 05:28 PM
1

I agree completely. We can't abandon the concept of discipline for bad behavior because someone experienced trauma. It only leads to more bad behavior. Meanwhile that discipline needs to have better standards and more focus on correcting the bad behavior. Punishment alone still works, but there are definitely better programs.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 08:17 PM
114

Sticky this please
/r/MensRights12/08/18 07:41 PM
0

I know you're being hardcore downvoted, but I generally agree with you when it comes to sex with minors. All genders involved. It's still wrong, and needs to remain illeglal, but victims often have full agency. Especially females who mature a few years earlier than males. We all tend to overreact to these stories. Here's where I have to disagree a bit. We have no idea how much agency this boy had. At his age, I was prepubescent and not sexually active in any way. I would have been a 100% molest …
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:23 PM
5

Insings? Involuntary single?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:59 AM
3

How about a ban that prevents public funding of sexist university courses, but not a ban on the subjects, in general? Would that be a fair middle ground to you?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:00 AM
2

I'm pretty sure private groups are forming at this exact moment. Being that they are private, we won't know about them for a while. Easy solution to Harvard's anti-male stance.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:43 PM
50

We're talkikg about a country that arrested a Youtube comedian for making an inappropriate joke. Half our comedians in the U.S. would be in prison under the same "rules" as the U.K. I don't expect citizens to have any power over the government there.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:13 PM
11

There would need to be a specific accusation of that conduct first. The question is, does someone over there have the energy and nerve to create the false accusation to get the ball rolling on this legal-slander/libel process?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:04 PM
5

Congratulations brother. I know it's a small success after such a ruthless beating, but it's better than nothing. And to think that feminists feel people like you are an acceptable casualty in the rape hysteria of this era. I hope the rest of your life is filled with random good fortune.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:32 AM
2

Do you think that women should have to continue to provide the man with the lifestyle that he became accustomed to? Sex, household chores, food prep, etc... If not, why would a man be required to continue to provide, but not a woman? P.s. I'm giving you an upvote for actually engaging in the conversation and not just talking trash.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:59 PM
2

Most definitely. That black swan scene.......
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:06 AM
6

Dude, check her pics out from when she isn't wearing makeup. Pretty gross difference.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:41 AM
1

Stay strong brother!
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:41 AM
1

Of course, but we need to do everything in our power to be that honest influence. Feminists and other SJWs are going to work non-stop at lying to them and brainwashing them. We have to start red pilling them asap. I'm already planting seeds with my 9 year old nephew. I show him statistical proof that his teachers are lying to him and he thinks it's hilarious. My uncle did the same for me when I was little. It's going to be a tough fight though.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:39 AM
1

I actually think you are right, but wanted to exaggerate a bit in my comment. My best friend and I were talking about gen Z the other day and we both have a lot of faith in their potential. They seem to be just as appalled at the young gen Y SJW insanity as us later gen Y and regular gen X people are. I'm fortunately not one of those middle aged people bitching about the new youth. Yet. Lol.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:35 AM
29

"Its not sexism if its targeting men." -95% of the Western population FTFY
/r/MensRights02/08/18 05:19 AM
1

Even at that, there are more nerve endings in the foreskin than the exposed part of the clitoris. And not all female circumcision removes clitoral tissue. Many types just remove the clitoral hood, some labia, or makes a ritualistic scratch on the clit. Those are all still banned in the U.S. despite being less invasive than male circumcision. It's pretty weird to me...
/r/TheRedPill02/08/18 12:24 AM
3

Bro, you called a molestation victim lucky and are wondering why people are mad about a kid being molested. That's called support. A vast majority of molestation cases are not bloody, and involve willing participants. Girls who were molested often talk about feeling guilty for enjoying it. It's a sick thing, but it's reality. Assuming the intent of the offender ("based on love") doesn't change the offense. Does it change the offense if the male offender has feelings for his female victims? Would…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:56 PM
3

But your saying people shouldn't be angry about a young child being molested. I don't get how that isn't supporting the molesting of children. Please change my perspective here. I don't actually want to think you think that way. What makes this molestation case okay (unworthy of anger) as opposed to others, such as when sexes are reversed?
/r/MensRights01/08/18 10:45 PM
7

So you are literally saying it okay to molest children as long as they are males. I hope you are on a vpn cause the feds might have your IP now.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 09:19 PM
9

Do you support adult men having sex with 13 year old girls? Genuinely curious, not starting an argument. Just as a quick add on, females physically and sexually develop about 2 years earlier than boys, so a 13 year old boy is roughly equal to an 11 year old girl. Do you support grown men having sex with 11 year old girls too? Again, honest question, because I am curious how others think.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 05:38 PM
3

Damn Poe's law.... You had me believing you were actually serious. Shows how insane the anti-male groups have become. Indistinguishable from sarcasm now.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:33 PM
4

How could that be substantial when the accused is making a contrary statement? What about believing the accused instead? Should that be substantial evdience of the accuser committing a false report, therefore accusers should be punished? How do we decide who to automatically believe? Accusers, or accused? Male or female? What criteria could possibly be objective here? In your opinion, of course.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:11 PM
1

Goodmods suggestion is spot on, but in the meantime, I donate $100 every month to a non-prof that supports rights for males on some degree. Equal parenting organizations, anti-circumcision, funding to men's shelters, etc... Trust me, they appreciate every dime you send...
/r/MensRights30/07/18 06:49 PM
1

I have zero disagreement with you there either. They also seriously discriminate against non-Muslims within their countries. Which is why 90% of my family left the middle east. It makes me lmao when westerners try to act like there is legitimate racial and religious discriminatation in their countries. It's like someone telling me a flick to the arm is assault and battery.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 06:36 PM
1

I was born in Turkey, but I get your point. The Muslim Ottomans massacred my family, so I have zero love for their faith, and I have been an atheist all of my adult life as well. I was only making a point to the other person that hating a part of a religion doesn't mean you hate the religion as a whole. I'm well aware that Islam is the worst of the major religions in terms of impact, but that still doesn't mean I hate Muslims. If I used that logic, I would hate a few races too....
/r/MensRights30/07/18 06:01 PM
3

Even if they are natural, no one should be forced into a role they don't want, or sometimes aren't even capable of. Free world. Fill the role YOU want to fill. If that aligns with your faith, then great.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 05:42 PM
3

Personally, I have zero hate for Islam, and other major religions, I just hate certain practices of those religions. People always try to conflate the two concepts. I hate that Muslims and Jewish people engage in ritualistic child genital mutilation. I don't hate all Muslims and Jews for that. I hate that Muslims create structures that allow less rights to women. I hate that Christians force men and women into outdated gender roles that are shit for both sides. I'm allowed to bash on those pract…
/r/MensRights30/07/18 05:28 PM
130

100% agree. Then after that, learn to spin plates without letting it change who you have become or taking your free time. That's the true victory.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/18 07:32 AM
6

But if men continue to refuse to marry, then at least we can all keep getting a turn with the best looking women. That's our real leverage at this point. Holding out our attention, labor, and marriage so we can all get a turn with the good ones. Even if they are attached to a beta cuck feminist who's paying their bills.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/18 07:28 AM
1

I see your point, but what I mean is the rules of the game are already in place. Redpillers know the rules and practice playing the game with pickup artistry and a few precautions against false rape accusations. MRAs work to change the rules and protect men from false accusations. MGTOWs just quit the game and are almost safe from falae accusations. Everyone has a place to go in the manosphere.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:08 AM
2

Yeah, it's kind of counterintuitive when you look at how public is usually used. I.e. "public office." Cheers buddy.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:01 AM
4

Or dirtbag couples are going to take turns being the DV victim, or just do it at the same time for a couples vacation. I'm kinda jealous
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:51 AM
1

A public company is one that people can buy stock in. Apple (AAPL) for example. It doesn't mean government owned, just shareholder owned and any (almost) member of the public can buy into ownership of the company. And groups like pension funds.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:45 AM
8

That's literally the point of the red pill forums. Play the game instead of trying to change the rules
/r/MensRights27/07/18 03:19 AM
4

I partially agree. Males should stop helping females. Let them learn things the hard way. I changed that approach in my life and I've never felt better. I can't count the number of times women had yelled at me about telling them they were doing something wrong, especially when they ask me directly for help. Now i just smirk and watch them fail. And say "i dont know" when asked for help. Ya know, I don't want to be an evil mansplainer.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 11:53 PM
4

Lol my mom admittedly did this to my dad. Now divorced. My older cousin did this to her daughter's father. Now divorced. My best female friend from high school did this three years ago to her now husband. Betting they will be divorced in less than five years. Old tricks don't produce new results...
/r/TheRedPill25/07/18 01:11 AM
2

Those are great questions, and I doubt that law enforcement has a statistical category for each of those scenarios. This also reminds me of a story an ex cop told me about a girl reporting a rape. She made the report and no where in the statement did she describe being raped. She admitted to initiating sexual contact, being on top, being relatively sober (despite the boy being nearly passed out drunk), never saying "no" or "stop" and to trying to date the boy afterwards. She didn't lie one bit i…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 08:56 PM
4

There are definitely some privileges with being male, just like there are privileges with being any race or category. However, overall, males have less privileges than females in western societies and certain other societies like India. I don't know about other cultures and societies, so I won't speak either way about them. The blind assumption that being a male is a privilege over being a female can't be backed up by anything concrete. At best I hear about obscure anecdotal experiences or refer…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 04:13 AM
9

Or hold off for an hour since I have complete control. Unlike all of my cut friends I've talked to. They all seem to alternate between ED and premie...
/r/MensRights24/07/18 01:58 AM
9

Also worth noting (I swear this isn't a defense of false accusers) that many unfounded sexual assult cases are the result of the accuser believing they were actually victims because of fake-progressive's redefining what constitutes sexual assault. The defintions are often contradictory to the legal definition, but the accuser won't always know that. This is why feminists defining sexual assault is so dangerous... It can, and will, eventually include everything a male ever does.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 09:27 PM
4

r/thathappened
/r/MensRights22/07/18 08:11 PM
5

Wow, what a fucking dork. Tip your fedora next time...
/r/MensRights22/07/18 03:03 PM
4

Yep. You're pretty much a rape-Hitler. Report for de-masculation training asap.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 05:58 AM
1

No argument there...
/r/MensRights20/07/18 04:17 PM
1

Lol yeah, it's sexual battery in California. Also, it misdemeanor child molest too. Just pointing out how easily stats can be fluffed to "prove" victimization, like with the college rape stat lie about women. It's pure bullshit. Also, California has the dumbest age of consent laws. Two 17 years olds doing hand stuff with each other is a full on felony...
/r/MensRights20/07/18 06:12 AM
5

Great mental advice. Also, if you're married/have kids, always stay prepared for divorce/break up too. Keep as many hidden assets as possible, keeo her working and as high of an income as possible (no child support or divorce rape that way), spend tons of time with kids and take pictures for court purposes. Have sife chicks and nannies on speed dial so you can transition like a champ. Never be needy...
/r/TheRedPill20/07/18 06:07 AM
1

Sexual abuse can easily be applied to many situations that minors experience. I would think the statistics are even higher than this. Nearly everyone I know had sex before the age of legal consent, so this would apply. I had my ass smacked by other guy friends back in my athlete days in school, and this is legally sexual abuse. Even if I wanted it, because I couldn't have consented. Of course, I didn't want it... I wonder what criteria was actually used though.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 06:00 AM
2

Sounds like a pretty awesome/clap filled month. End it with a zithromycin cocktail and you're set.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 02:56 AM
7

Don't fall for this propaganda. Low T is literally deadly and this was a 28 day trial. These pharma companies are willing to destroy your entire endocrine system to make money. This shit is pure evil. Meanwhile RISUG still faces roadblocks (likely from other pharma companies). DON'T TAKE THIS PILL.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 01:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter