TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GratefullyGodless Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by GratefullyGodless on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

No, facts and statistics don't prove you'll be right. Because you don't know that couple. Instead you're projecting your own feelings about relationships onto them, and that couple may wind up spending the rest of their lives in wedded bliss. Being in a couple is not about being equal, it's about being together. In a relationship each person has strengths and weaknesses, and you have to learn to balance those strengths and weaknesses to help each other. Good relationships are not a rare as you t…
/r/MGTOW19/01/17 04:08 PM
3

Just because you may have had a bad experience with a relationship, doesn't mean that others will as well. As someone who has been married for 33 years, and has had a very active sex life with my wife that whole time, I can already tell you that your wrong in your assumption that women lose interest in sex just because they get into a relationship with someone. I bet he DID get laid that night, and I bet they had a wonderful time. You say that you have experience from being in a LTR, but I also …
/r/MGTOW19/01/17 03:59 PM
9

It's not toxic femininity, but basic psychology. Reducing people to simple caricatures because of ones own bitterness, is nothing more than projecting ones own feelings about a matter. People are a vast panoply of feelings, emotions, and motivations, but to read such bitterness directed at people the OP doesn't even know, just shows how twisted up inside OP is to have to insult them and just not let them be. His anger, and apparently your own, show that you both have some deep emotional scars th…
/r/MGTOW19/01/17 03:44 PM
25

You don't know this couple. You are taking your own rage and bitterness and projecting it on them and deciding that there's no way they'll remain happy and in love, when you don't know them and have no clue what they are like or what their relationship is like. That says much more about you than it does about either of them.
/r/MGTOW18/01/17 04:24 PM
2

Did you even look at the articles you posted? Not one of them backs up your assertion that Women and SJWs are in any way responsible for their issues.
/r/MGTOW28/10/16 04:09 AM
0

Right, the same Gene Roddenberry who had a female first officer on the original pilot for TOS? The only reason she didn't make it past the pilot was because of the studio, but Roddenberry wanted a powerful woman on the show. So, don't drag Gene Roddenberry's name into your misogynistic complaints, he would not have been in your favor.
/r/MGTOW27/10/16 06:16 PM
2

Paid shill? Really, someone disagrees with your points and the first thing you do is think that people couldn't possibly disagree with you unless they're paid to do so? Well, I'm not a paid shill. I'm just someone who gets tired of people trying to bend facts to fit their own personal feelings about an issue as opposed to actually considering the facts in an objective manner. You're the one who created a list of bullet points about things without bothering to even consider whether there were any…
/r/MGTOW27/10/16 05:59 PM
9

Twitter is in the shitter. Nobody wants to buy it and it's hemorrhaging cash. Not because of SJWs. It's in trouble because it's an outdated platform that's struggling against Instagram, Pintirest, etc. Marvel print sales have tanked. They haven't tanked. Comic sales go up and down. Most print comic sales are driven by events nowadays, which is why every time you turn around Marvel and DC are doing some big cross comic event, such as Rebirth, Secret Wars 2, etc. So, Marvel will be back on top of …
/r/MGTOW26/10/16 04:12 PM
1

Yes, but TRP does it to women whether they want it or not, with the average TRPer only thinking of their own gratification, not whether it's something the woman would enjoy or not. After all, it's not like he warns the woman that he's going to try using red pill techniques on her, he just does so, what does he care what she thinks.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 05:01 PM
2

Such a good son you are. I hope your mother cares as much about you as you care about her. "woman issues in a gynocentric world" Just because you believe something does not make it true. There is far, far more evidence that the world is very much male dominated, and will continue to be for quite some time. Just because some women are, in your opinion, not being properly reverential to you and other men, does not mean the whole world is suddenly gynocentric.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 04:57 PM
1

As someone who has been married for 31 years to a beautiful wife who I have an active sex life with, I would have to disagree. You just want to believe that good boys don't win to bolster your own beliefs. I find it interesting what your comment says about you though. As it seems to imply that you're not a good boy, but rather a bad boy, ie the villain. I think that is a pretty apt analogy of TRPers, since they seek to manipulate others rather than engage in honest dialogue with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 04:48 PM
1

<<think what you will about TRP, but it is based on lots of "sources", by which i mean non-academic (and sometimes academic, but not primarily) "streams" of human "wisdom". The collected wisdom of 10000s of men who are "good with women" over millenia, ev psych, biology, marketing, surveys, observation, behavioral economics, personal dating experience, a generation's divorce stories coming out publically over time etc. it has been refined through a decade + of wide ranging and broad discussion al…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 07:48 PM
2

Never thought i'd see a bper say this, but it's true. Folks seem surprised the a BPer would say this, but it's just a truth. Anytime someone, male or female, gets involved with someone else it's a crap shoot. You may know certain facts about the other, but you don't really know what they're going to be like when you're intimate with them, when their guard comes down and you see the real person behind the masks we all wear. There's a chance it might be someone you love, or someone you really hate…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 02:16 PM
3

No, it just means he made a poor impression, or she's involved with someone else, or she's just at a point in her life where she wants to be alone. It doesn't mean they would not fit together well, just that they won't get a chance to find out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 01:38 AM
22

But, it doesn't mean that the guy has chosen the best one for him, just the one that gave in to him. It doesn't mean that there wasn't a better fit for him but she turned him down. So, it's still a crap shoot for men or women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 07:58 PM
2

Men have no say in whether the child is produced. The decision to take a fetus and allow it to become a child is 100% hers to make. Correct. Can you accept this? If I slept with a woman and she got pregnant, yes. Because I knew when I had sex with her that pregnancy was an option, and if I had sex with her I can't complain if that happens, because it was a possibility of having sex with her. It's like eating junk food regularly and then complaining when it makes you fat. You knew that, but went …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 08:01 PM
2

I'm sorry but I can't believe as you do that women are stupid emotional children incapable of short term planning. But, you believe guys are? You're basically saying that men are immature and shouldn't have to consent to taking care of their accidental children, but women are calculating schemers getting themselves knocked up deliberately? Your characterization isn't very flattering for either side.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 04:57 PM
1

Yes, they do, which is why mothers are charged for things like child abandonment or neglect all the time. But, many women hide their pregnancies for one reason or another, and then when the child is born, they can't very well admit that the child is theirs, and if it weren't for safe havens, they would leave those children in garbage dumpsters, or some other unsafe place. So, to keep those children safe, the law states that those women can leave them at safe havens clear and free. If you want to…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 07:34 PM
1

Obviously based on my screen name I'm not a religious type. But, neither does it make me a hypocrite for disagreeing with you. You are not making a case for equality, because Men cannot normally get pregnant. Once medical technology gets to the point that the child could be transferred out of her womb and into yours, then you can be making a point for equality, but until then you're advocating that you should get a say in the control of her body. Will she then get reciprocal control of decisions…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 07:24 PM
3

Yes, men don't get a choice whether women get abortions or not. Too bad. But, it is equal, because if you ever get pregnant, you can choose to have an abortion. The law does not differentiate. Men or women can get abortions. But, they can't force abortions on others. Yes, women could abstain too, but if you're a guy, and you know that the possibility of sex with a woman is that she could get pregnant and you may wind up a father and you go ahead anyway, don't be a whiny piss boy about it when sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 07:10 PM
4

No, we do not, because we've seen the alternative, which is dead children. When someone's back is against the wall, with no resources, they do desperate things, and to discourage them from leaving their children to die somewhere, they're encouraged to leave them somewhere safe instead. It's not about the mother at that point, it's about the child. You're equating a measure taken to protect a child, to expecting a man to pay part of his earnings to caring for the fruit of his actions when they ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 07:01 PM
-1

Actually, that depends on your religious beliefs. Many religions believe that as soon as conception occurs, that is a child. Just because you believe otherwise, doesn't mean that others do. Unless you're saying that religious freedom is irrelevant to your argument. EDIT: Spelling.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 04:34 PM
0

What you're talking about is not men vs. women's rights, but individual rights vs. societal needs. Society expects both parents to care for their children, and has no desire to pay the bills for the child just because you couldn't keep it in your pants and have sex without intercourse (Oral, Digital, etc.), or abstain. Society will support the child if necessary, but the laws of this country are set-up to make sure that parents support their children financially, so society doesn't have to do so…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 04:27 PM
2

We do exist, but we just spend more time with our wives than online, so we represent a smaller amount of online activity than the misogynistic factions, that are alone and bitter and have nothing but the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:13 PM
3

Oh yes, she played me into a wonderful sex life for over 30 years now. Gosh, what a fool I've been having a respectful relationship with a beautiful woman, and having plenty of sex to boot. What was I thinking?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 04:45 PM
4

When my wife and I started dating, I asked her for a BJ and she obliged me, and then threw up all over the place after I came. So, I told her I wouldn't ask her to do that again, and even though we've been married over 30 years now, I never have. But, just because she doesn't give me BJs does not mean that she's not sexually attracted to me, or I her. We have plenty of other ways to satisfy each other without her having to do something she doesn't enjoy, and which would kill the moment instead o…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 05:52 PM
-3

You did see the title of this post, right? The main post was about whether paying a woman to get an abortion would be better than getting roped into paying child support. If men don't want to pay support, then they need to learn to keep it in their pants when there's a possibility of getting someone pregnant. If he doesn't want to pay, then he should learn when not to play. But, that goes against the RP ethos of being a player, so it's much easier to blame the woman and keep on being irresponsib…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 09:16 PM
-1

I am going to repeat back to you what I just read, and you tell me what is wrong with it, ok? There was a time that when a woman got pregnant, it was considered unladylike to not step up and give birth to your child. Women were grown-up enough to take responsibility for what they did, not try to weasel out of it by saying it's somehow anti-woman to actually give birth to your child, and expect society to accept dwindling populations. Actually if there had been better abortifacients back then, ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 08:53 PM
1

Yes, women can get abortions, and men don't have a say in it. Boo hoo. If you don't want the woman you fuck to get an abortion, don't fuck her. There's always a chance to get a woman pregnant even with birth control. And if she does get pregnant, guess what, it's her body, not yours. You don't get to decide what she does with it, anymore than she gets to decide what you do with yours. And this thread is full of red pillers talking about how they shouldn't have to take responsibility, and women s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 08:08 PM
0

The reason there wasn't always child support was because once upon a time, men were manly enough to take responsibility for their actions, and wouldn't have dreamt of shirking his responsibilities to his children. But, that's changed now, and some whiny men consider it a great crime to actually be responsible for their children, and so they have to be held accountable for their actions by the law instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 06:28 PM
3

Why should he/she have to provide a source when you're the one making the unsubstantiated claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 06:22 PM
7

Really, you're going to compare Child Support to slavery? Wow, just when I think I've heard it all. There was a time that when a man got a woman pregnant, it was considered unmanly to not step up and support your child. Men were grown-up enough to take responsibility for what they did, not try to weasel out of it by saying it's somehow anti-man to actually pay for the support of your child, and expect society to do that instead. Real men would be horrified at the thought of leaving his responsib…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 06:14 PM
8

Why is it in his best interests to get into an argument with you? It seems more like you're the butt-hurt one, whining about how your Father won't argue with you, because he considers your position so stupid that he won't even lower himself to debate the issue with you. Frankly, I have more respect for your Father, who I doubt very much would come onto Reddit and whine about how his son keeps trying to get him to argue about red pill philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 09:20 PM
7

Your father is under no obligation to argue with you about your beliefs. In fact, no one is under any obligation to argue your beliefs with you. You can call it shutting down the conversation, but not everyone likes to argue with other people. Sure, the internet may make it seem like that, but irl that is not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 07:11 PM
22

RP: Girls are stupid poopy-heads, but I'm going to kiss as many of them as I can. TBP: Haha, look at the RP boys being stupid. TPPD: "Girls are dumb." "Are not." Are too." "Nuh uh!" "Uh huh!" There, explained like you're 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 05:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter