TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Grayswan Archive

View 26 posts and 233 comments by Grayswan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
100

Social IssuesGrayswan/r/MensRights07/11/15 02:54 PM
59

Grayswan/r/MensRights19/10/10 10:23 AM
44

Legal RightsGrayswan/r/MensRights09/08/15 01:37 PM
43

False AccusationGrayswan/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:21 AM
41

Social IssuesGrayswan/r/MensRights13/09/15 04:43 PM
34

Grayswan/r/MensRights03/07/10 05:07 PM
24

FeminismGrayswan/r/MensRights25/10/15 04:09 AM
19

Grayswan/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:34 PM
17

OpinionGrayswan/r/MensRights21/12/14 05:55 PM
17

Grayswan/r/MensRights11/09/13 05:21 AM
16

Grayswan/r/MensRights24/02/11 12:49 AM
11

Grayswan/r/MensRights23/06/11 11:30 PM
11

False AccusationGrayswan/r/MensRights03/12/21 02:28 AM
6

re: FeminismGrayswan/r/MensRights19/04/14 02:41 PM
4

Blogs/VideoGrayswan/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:56 AM
3

Grayswan/r/MensRights09/01/11 12:12 PM
3

Grayswan/r/MensRights07/11/10 09:14 PM
3

Grayswan/r/MensRights04/11/10 05:23 PM
1

Grayswan/r/MensRights29/01/11 08:53 AM
1

Grayswan/r/MensRights13/01/11 01:45 PM
1

Grayswan/r/MensRights14/12/11 05:21 AM
1

re: FeminismGrayswan/r/MensRights22/06/14 08:37 PM
1

Grayswan/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:36 AM
0

Grayswan/r/MensRights19/04/14 02:34 PM
0

FeminismGrayswan/r/MensRights25/03/16 03:27 AM
0

Grayswan/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:39 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
32

This is the way. You don't need to attack society to kill it -- just stop supporting it and it will crumble under its own weight.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:47 AM
-9

He's right, but it was leftists like him who created the sexual grievance industry to attack the right. So hungry for power they ignored the wisdom of not creating a monster you can't control because it will eventually turn on you. So now it is. His qualms are coming way too late.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:32 AM
4

Just goes to show when your reptile brain has decided what it wants, your rationalizations don't need to make a lick of sense.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 03:26 AM
3

A distinction without a difference.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 02:08 AM
6

It's the narrative over all. If the narrative and reality disagree, reality is wrong, and whatever lies need to be told to "correct" reality, will be told. Whatever truth needs to be hid, will be hid.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 11:41 PM
2

Notice that the "drive" doesn't include, you know, scholarships...a frequent tactic to increase female attendance to schools. They aren't serious yet.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:08 AM
1

This is battlespace preparation for Hillary. Brought to you by the propaganda arm of the democratic party, the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:51 AM
7

These schools are increasingly being sued for lack of due process. They will just open themselves up for even larger judgments if they put it on someone's public transcript.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:29 AM
14

Men aren't afraid of marriage. They are afraid of divorce.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 12:19 AM
3

I think you hit on the really important point. They protested because they didn't want other people to hear a viewpoint they dislike.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 02:27 AM
4

Monogamy evolved at the cultural level, not individual level. It out-competes non-monogamy because it motivates men to build civilization as a means to achieve long-term success of their children (since, being monogamous, fathers know their children). And civilizations easily demolish non-monogamous tribes. I don't think monogamy is advantageous at the individual genome level.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 01:55 AM
1

Don't for get about slow-motion. Slow-motion is sexist too.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 12:32 AM
13

"...victim culture encourages people to seek help from third parties, either authorities or the public, rather than seeking satisfaction themselves." The thought that struck me about this is: isn't this what women have always done? So, one could just say: the culture has become feminized.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 06:39 PM
0

Can you be an MRA and a progressive? Better ask progressives. MRAs say sure, but progressives aren't as tolerant as MRAs.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:40 AM
1

IMO, if some sub "proactively" bans you, nothing of value was lost. That sub is a waste of time at best.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:17 PM
2

"I take responsibility for my errors, but no I don't!"
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:10 AM
13

Clearly, the vast majority don't believe the lie that feminism is about equality.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:26 PM
2

Think of the NYT as the mouth of The Powers That Be (TPTB). The fact that this article was published tells us TPTB think the current trends among males will threaten their power. The comments to the article tell us it will take much more than articles like this to effect any change.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 02:20 AM
11

I've gotten so cynical with the mainstream media that anything I read I'm trying to figure out their angle. I can't accept that they actually believe that marriage is a good thing now, given the decades spend tearing it down.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 01:13 AM
1

Should've been "How to spot a player", which isn't quite the same thing.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:40 PM
3

When reality and The Narrative disagree, reality is wrong, and must be "fixed" with lies.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 10:00 PM
-3

Women do most shopping. TV is an advertising-supported medium. TV will always cater to women. Stop watching TV, it's for women.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 05:04 PM
7

The bill passed the senate unanimously, so of course he signed it. But, know that he did so because it is very popular, not because he gives a whit about men now.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 02:38 AM
7

Well stated. Chivalry was a system that made demands on both sexes. Women like Gillian expect men to still hold up their end of the bargain even though women stopped holding up theirs long ago. And I'm sure she'll tell you she is not sexist, and believe it. She can't see her own sexism; she is too busy looking for it in others.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:24 PM
3

A step in between? Discredit Widipedia so people won't use it as a source of information. Widipedia should be discredited because it is biased.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:57 PM
1

The magazine needs to try to recover some of what's left of their reputation. So it's partly, if not mostly, a PR move. Myself, I think if they don't change some personnel also, changing some procedure won't avoid a repeat down the line.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:03 AM
15

I think when I first came around there were only about 1k. Wasn't all that long ago, actually. The growth has come very quickly.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:23 PM
1

Find new friends.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:12 AM
2

Why 51% rather than an equal 50% ? Because 51% would control the senate and that is what this is about. Power, not equality.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 01:13 AM
4

If a horde of foreign women abuse this to invade the US, that would make US women less valuable (relative to current) due to the extra competition.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:23 AM
3

I can't upvote this post enough. I think the analysis here is 100% spot-on.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:24 AM
1

Another article about the closing. Note that only the center (building) is closing, not the program.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:46 PM
2

The sub-test is this: If you don't agree with them, you aren't just wrong you're evil. And because you're evil, you're arguments are not legitimate and don't have to be addressed.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 02:01 AM
2

Think of it as a reframe. Instead of talking about what feminism is, you're talking about who are feminists. Many who support feminism on paper don't really want to be associated with feminists themselves.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 02:49 PM
1

He give 100s of BILLIONS to feminists in the stimulus. Compared to that, this is nothing.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:34 PM
3

And mention that it may impact your future donations.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 06:35 PM
5

You're take is quite fair, but you know feminists object to men judging women by cup size but not to women judging by credit score.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 06:25 PM
13

Even going with the elephant:ant ration, the criticism is still valid. If you aren't for equality for all, you aren't for equality at all.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:50 PM
3

Rule #1: Feminists lie. Rule #2: Feminists acuse you of lying when you speak truth that makes them look bad.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 12:35 AM
1

Apparently she cared enough to fight to put these unjust policies in place. How did she not notice they were unjust unless she was willfully blind to it?
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:52 AM
2

The word often is what I noticed. So sometimes they are not charged fees? Who decides? Unless there are clear criteria for assessing fees, the process is certainly open to abuse and bias. They need to have more transparency.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 04:12 PM
7

Rule #1: Feminists lie.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:57 AM
1

The outrage is real. The justification is fake.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:10 PM
11

The explanation is always sexism because otherwise women might have to consider their own behavior.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:18 AM
2

Religious conservatives, at least, are the same way. I'd say for the people who frequent sites like DailyKos, their ideology functions as their religion. Feminism is part of their ideology/religion and as such, speaking against it is treated much like blasphemy.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 04:11 AM
1

Liberals on that site and others like it all preach from the same narrative, so once you've read one, you've read them all. For them, ideology and The Narrative trump everything -- truth, data, evidence, even reality itself are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 08:03 PM
-13

I think he was following the feminist style and just making up stuff because, ya know, it ought to be true, so whether it is or it isn't is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 01:29 AM
22

The problem with marriage is divorce and divorce is like nuclear weapons: it works without ever being used.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:49 PM
2

Have they noticed what is happening with the economy? Women's share of the pie is increasing, but the pie itself is shrinking. Coincidence? If so, the rise of women is not offsetting the decline of society at large, so I wouldn't call it progress.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:24 PM
0

I disagree. I think there are still many who don't believe women are voilent and that belief leads to the disparate sentences we see. You see, if women aren't voilent, then something must be making them so. This example shows that cannot be true because she killed the last person you'd think -- the man she was going to marry.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 02:20 AM
46

This is what feminism looks like.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:07 AM
6

What can I do to guarantee this never happens to me? Never have kids.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 12:59 AM
1

They said there was a 50% rise in the last 4 years, so I'm guessing that means it rose from 2 to 3.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:35 AM
2

This is going to be the norm for the rest of western civilization. As men abandon it, women will fight all the harder over the dwindling scraps...right up 'til the crash, which they will be oblivious to.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 12:58 AM
1

I really can't make heads or tails of this mess.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:16 AM
2

Oh, this isn't rights being violated, it is result of misandry in colleges and society at large and should be documented here.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:37 AM
4

Yeah individual women don't need individual men, but women do need society and society does need men to function at a decent level. Men are increasingly refusing to support society because it caters only to women. It ain't gonna last.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 11:51 PM
4

She persisted in the lie for 9 years while he rotted in jail...and you're defending her?
/r/MensRights03/04/12 02:20 AM
3

I agree with what you say and would add that feminists actually believe their own BS that men are driven to control women by getting them pregnant. So they think not many men will take the pill in the first place. It's fine with me if they learn their mistake too late.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 01:45 AM
-1

Politicians are not the answer. Taking charge of you own life is.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:40 PM
5

They school didn't act to achieve justice, they acted to stem the negative PR.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:21 AM
5

Women are more susceptible to advertising. Ergo, any advertised medium will eventually and inevitably cater mainly to women.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:46 PM
2

He's probably "occupying" somewhere.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:41 PM
10

“I need glasses, I put up the picture of the wrong guy,” she wrote. “I’m a douche for that. SO SORRY. Blinded by rage.” Marrying her would probably be a BAD idea.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:31 PM
-1

Sign of the times: a woman is appreciated merely for not being terrible. Shouldn't that be the expected minimum?
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:14 PM
1

I think she learned a lot of what she knows from Roissy, and so, gets quite a bit right.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 03:05 AM
2

You get it. The author of the article doesn't. She points to a backward group who live in huts as the way to go. It sure is--if you like living in huts.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:57 AM
12

Your actions are irrelevant. If feminists do not like you, you are a sexists and your actions, whatever they are, will be interpreted as necessary to prove it.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 01:58 AM
8

Reverse prostitution--you have to pay her NOT to sleep with her.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 09:38 PM
2

Western colleges are eventually going to become the equivalent of "finishing schools for girls".
/r/MensRights31/08/11 02:49 AM
1

Ignoring women (feminists) will cause them to question their actions. Arguing with them will not.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 04:03 AM
5

Wow, feminists have created an education system that seems capable of attracting and educating only women. Who would have guessed it?
/r/MensRights23/06/11 01:09 AM
3

A vast wasteland.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 11:56 PM
1

Spot on.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 12:13 AM
6

Lifetime alimony is/was going to start hitting women much more in the next few decades. That is why something is being done now.
/r/MensRights11/02/11 12:30 AM
1

Well, I wasn't talking about you specifically, but the they in the OP's "makes their support seem insincere". I know bitching on the interwebs is superficial support already, but blogging about what boys wear instead of their grades is super extra superficial. :-)
/r/MensRights19/01/11 11:48 AM
-1

It totally makes their support seem insincere Why? Because they do it just to be able to say "I support men's rights too!" Meanwhile, the really important issues like boys failing in school and child visitation enforcement are quietly ignored. Thanks for the (superficial) support.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 04:07 PM
1

Maybe you should read Roissy's take on that site.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 05:49 AM
0

TED conference described.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 09:59 AM
1

The fact it was a TED talk was a big clue.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 08:18 PM
1

A good way to marry wisely is to date longly. I recommend dating for a minimum of 5 years before marriage. It is still a risk, though, and I don't ever recommend it.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 10:47 AM
22

Feminist extremists also get professorships, write books, get grants and are asked to help write legislation. Comparatively speaking, "true" feminists have very little influence.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 01:55 PM
1

Men are voting with their feet and leaving places like Sweden and taking their tax dollars with them. THAT is what has people concerned that feminism has gone too far...the money leaving.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 04:43 AM
3

More details and analysis here.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 02:55 AM
3

Here is a great article detailing this NOMAS group from the-spearhead.com
/r/MensRights09/01/11 02:52 AM
6

Better option: Never get in.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 02:06 AM
1

This is how it starts. It'll end in another holocaust. Guys, get out of California. Now.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 09:33 PM
3

Yeah, for a change. What happened to ruin the pussy-pass for her?
/r/MensRights05/01/11 09:01 AM
1

She did. Witnesses testified she was prone to violence.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 09:00 AM
4

You're assuming that socialist behaviour is some sort of binary state. You're socialist or you're not. That's ridiculous. I specifically said "...the more you use of it..." because I know socialism<->capitalism is a continuum. You have mis-characterized my statements. Further discussion is pointless.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 04:45 AM
2

It was the giant crash of the Soviet Union that gave socialism a bad name, not McCarthyism. Socialism has failed everywhere it's been tried. "Affirmative Action" is just another name for social marxism and the more you use it, the smaller your economy will shrink. See? Social Engineering, Affirmative Action, Social Marxism => Dystopia. As for a government controlled monopoly having a board of directors, well I'd say that's cargo cult.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 03:54 AM
3

Why don't you refuse to buy these companies' stock? Oh, right, because they make money. That is the job of companies--to make money--not carry out your distopian social engineering experiments.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 02:01 AM
12

I've noticed this in most every "soft" science. They have been infected by money and politics and their conclusions carry no weight with me.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 01:30 AM
7

Yeah, women call them all those names and then sleep with them, so all the name-calling is kinda empty.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 07:25 PM
5

It wasn't MRAs that made the personal into the political. Guess who did?
/r/MensRights30/12/10 04:31 AM
1

Feminists are mainly against Boehner because he is a conservative who is against their radical agenda. The so-called reason they give here is just for show.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 10:50 PM
3

I think Roissy always claimed that insecurity is the basis for attraction. Show me a woman that knows she's got you and I'll show you a woman that feels no attraction for you.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 09:57 PM
2

are Guardian and other news sources really that politically influenced by the left from social democracy that they even refuse to report on this kind of studies? Yes.
/r/MensRights24/12/10 01:42 AM
6

I fault her for looking at trends of the last 20-30 years and concluding the "200,000 years of male domination is over." The current society is unsustainable and the trends it has powered will not last.
/r/MensRights18/12/10 06:12 PM
9

I predict this Assange case will give feminism a black eye just like the Duke Lacrosse fiasco did.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 09:37 PM
6

Ok, well, the trash thing is definitely sexist, then.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 05:49 PM
2

Who makes the coffee? If, for example, women always make the coffee, then I'd say it's a fair trade.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 05:01 PM
4

90% of Nazis were pretty alright dudes, too. But they enabled the 10% at the top to commit great evil.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 08:55 AM
8

She met the man of her dreams at 36? I doubt it. She probably met many guys like him in her 20s, but wasn't interested because she was busy riding the alpha cock carousel. It is her own hypergamy's fault, not feminism. Feminism allowed her to follow her hypergamous nature, but didn't make her do it.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 08:48 AM
-1

It doesn't matter how much women out-earn men, you'll find some way to rationalize it. When it reaches 10% you'll change the explanation from "it's nothing" to "they're worth it!"
/r/MensRights12/12/10 08:57 PM
3

Just because feminist lawyers wear suits doesn't mean it isn't extortion.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 08:33 PM
2

Althouse's take. Ending with: "the Court did assert that in Lawrence, so according to Justice Scalia, under the existing precedent, consensual adult incest cannot survive rational-basis review."
/r/MensRights11/12/10 01:18 PM
9

The girl did learn a valuable lesson. Violence works and is acceptable--mom supports it! She'll wind up in bigger trouble herself one day unless she unlearns that lesson.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 10:46 PM
5

Since there are more women than men, if you subtract one from each side, the ratio of women to men increases.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 12:15 PM
6

Sounds like the stuff early feminists probably heard. Does anyone think changing this misandric culture is going to be easy?
/r/MensRights09/12/10 05:36 AM
6

The study is pretty bare-threaded. There is no explanation for how the dropping marriage rate affects things. Maybe fewer of the bad marriages are happening, so they ones that do happen look better. The upper class are having far fewer children than before: what is the effect of that? I just can't tell much from this report.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 01:20 PM
2

In a similar vein: Steve Sailer's Law of Female Journalism.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 02:20 AM
2

AKA Solipsism.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 02:18 AM
5

The writer wants to embrace "new models of romance" i.e. women should drop hypergamy and date men that make less than them. Yeah, good luck with that!
/r/MensRights07/12/10 05:37 PM
3

Police like to play up how they're "saving the community from child molesters" on cases like these that get lots of media attention. Looks like they overdid it this time and it's going to cost them. A few more lawsuits like this one and maybe we'll see law enforcement start doing things more by-the-book.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 02:22 AM
2

Shrink 4 Men index Specifically, see How Do I Get My Crazy, Abusive Girlfriend Out of My House and My Life?
/r/MensRights02/12/10 07:14 AM
0

I think you are saying you disagree with the article we are allegedly discussing, but you don't refudiate any of its points. The article made it pretty clear that feminists create intellectually dishonest statistics to manipulate women in to states of fear and victimhood and leverage that into money and power. Anti-rape groups are political groups first, anti-rape groups second. And that saying is true: politics is business by another name and if you aren't making money in it, you are being used…
/r/MensRights02/12/10 07:09 AM
-1

...feminism has made me more proactive about protecting myself and has given me a lot of perspective about the whole situation... The whole point of the article was that the perspective feminism gives women is warped because it is based on lies.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 01:58 AM
3

Lots of good articles about getting over abusive women: Shrink4Men
/r/MensRights01/12/10 01:07 PM
1

It's a racket, alright. These companies decide it's cheaper to pay "protection" money than get sued by NWLC.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 08:40 AM
1

If you don't like this, vote with your feet. Don't ever live in B.C. I won't.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 08:35 AM
1

NAWALT.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 01:33 PM
5

I threw the cookbook across the room and stormed upstairs... he got the message and ceded some of the territory back to me. Violence works. And I guess it's OK as long as a woman does it.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 04:55 AM
5

If my gf called me "bitch" in public, she would be my ex-gf pretty quick. That is disrespectful.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 04:51 AM
4

I suggest the reason this doesn't happen (as much) in the US (or elsewhere) is not because of EEO rules, but because people don't put pics on their resume here.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 02:41 AM
3

In the actual paper, they state that employment agencies showed no difference as to attractive/plain applicants, only companies hiring directly. Clearly, the difference has nothing to do with what kind of worker you are, only what kind of co-worker.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 02:29 AM
4

This was done in Israel, where they haven't had a civil rights movement to strongly de-emphasize superficial traits like skin color and so on.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 02:25 AM
1

TED has become too politicized by liberals so I don't watch anymore.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 08:55 PM
1

Semen is chock full of psychotropics. Women (anyone, really) can get addicted to the stuff.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 04:34 PM
7

Here is another post about it.
/r/MensRights21/11/10 11:54 PM
4

Julius Caesar tried it in 18 B.C. The English imposed it in 1695. The Russians under Peter the Great used it in 1702, as did the Missouri legislature in 1820. The Spartans of ancient Greece didn’t care about the money—they preferred public humiliation. Bachelors in Sparta were required to march around the public market in wintertime stark naked, while singing a song making fun of their unmarried status. Source.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 09:56 AM
-1

If you've never heard of her (as I haven't), then most likely, no.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 02:34 AM
2

Some people call it a Daily Me. It's sad when you see it.
/r/MensRights13/11/10 03:10 AM
1

Read Alonso's comment at the article. Here is a direct link.
/r/MensRights11/11/10 06:58 AM
0

I must've hit it pretty close to the mark to get her all riled up like that, huh kid?
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:01 AM
0

Game theory (the economic kind) says your situation is and extreme outlier, unless there is something you are leaving out. I'll bet it's the latter but we'll never know since it must be something you don't want to admit. I'd guess the guys and much older than you. That would equalize some of the variable.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:00 AM
-2

So, none of you are married. Your guys are safe from divorce-theft. That is all I'm telling guys--rent, don't buy.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 01:47 AM
0

Damn! You know how much tail I could pull makin' 90k/yr? He needs to dump that bitch (getting alimony is a bonus) and get crackin', so-to-speak.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 01:27 AM
0

plenty of men want women when they are out of their 20's (and 30's and 40's) ...for sex. And it's the betas who never got any play and don't excite you much, but it's all you can get at that age. This reddit is exactly to show those bitter betas how it is such a bad deal for them. Just don't do it.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 01:19 AM
0

I don't think he likes republicans much either.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 01:06 AM
0

Studies clearly show the more partners a woman has before marriage, the less likely it will last. "Used up" may not be the best phrase to describe this effect, but the ideas are not dissimilar.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 12:53 AM
1

I think this article shows how fair-pay laws could be worse for all of us.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 09:23 PM
0

According to your quote, I did read it wrong, but the comment I responded to is marked as edited, so I'm not sure. In any event, they decided who were classified as feminists, so the study has no predictive power about self-described feminists.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 05:22 PM
1

I'd recommend read Roissy's page. The archives (on the right) go back years. He was one of the first to associate game with men's rights. The comments on his posts are good quality reading, too. Many links to other resources to explore. That should keep you busy for a month or two at least.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 04:59 PM
5

A person was classified as not being feminist if they mentioned disliking men in their definition of feminism. It's a study designed to find the result they wanted to find. Fail.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 03:42 AM
3

If profit isn't primary, the why isn't the NFL 50-50 black/white and male/female?
/r/MensRights06/11/10 03:51 PM
0

Courts have treated DNA like Intellectual Property and decided that IP can be controlled by the owners no matter how it spreads. Monsanto, I believe, established this precedent with genetically modified corn. Seems to me that directly applies here, but I am not a lawyer.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 02:26 PM
1

Without much fanfare, the Scandinavian country has been moving away from socialism.Sweden - the newest red state.
/r/MensRights04/11/10 10:01 PM
2

I read that as the point of the article. It is not an initiative. At least, not one that is meant to actually reduce DV. It is strictly a cynical political ploy. It is meant to attract female votes, nothing more.
/r/MensRights04/11/10 06:47 PM
1

It was a two page article. Obviously, you skipped the second page. Here's some quotes: In the area of child abuse, the federal Administration for Children and Families somberly notes, “In 2008, approximately 56% of child abuse and child neglect perpetrators were women and 42% were men.” According to a national survey by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, 9% of teenage girls, compared to 11% of adolescent boys, have been slapped, hit, or otherwise hurt by their opposite-sex partner Centers for…
/r/MensRights04/11/10 06:04 PM
2

I am strongly motivated to avoid paying taxes.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 06:00 AM
2

I took Alinksy's statements to mean more about firing up your base than being directly effective against the enemy. Growing the base is more important now than attacking.
/r/MensRights29/10/10 07:08 PM
3

Good comments at the story.
/r/MensRights29/10/10 04:39 PM
0

"One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other." -- Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals That is from the playbook that liberals and feminists use. Do we need to stoop that low to combat them? No, but demonizing feminism and feminists (not all women) is required, I think.
/r/MensRights29/10/10 04:24 PM
4

Women feed off your fear. Just act 100% confident...like whatever shit might go down, you can handle it. Act like you own the place. In fact, do this all the time and people will trust you.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 05:31 PM
1

This is why only 8% of Americans trust traditional media (only 6% in the under-30 crowd).
/r/MensRights27/10/10 04:11 PM
3

Zero appreciation for the abilities of men. You see where the misandry in society comes from. It comes from the top.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 11:22 PM
5

The technical name is Fundamental Attribution Error. Men do this to, but women are especially guilty.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 07:34 PM
1

Everybody has ultra-thin skins these days. Can NO ONE take a joke anymore without getting pissed?
/r/MensRights26/10/10 06:49 PM
4

Who cares what CNN reports. The Lame-stream media stopped informing and started entertaining people many years ago.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 07:58 PM
2

I'm just skeptical that women reading this reddit are going to be motivated to do anything more than hand-wringing. To paraphrase Milton Friedman, "women will not change until it is profitable to do so". Since marriage and children are how women extract resources from men, when men stop accepting the roles of husband and father, women will lower the price. i.e. they will make those roles less unattractive to men.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 05:23 PM
1

Whoops! Got it back-asswards. Thanks.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 02:39 PM
3

feminists...can be converted to support critical mens rights when they understand it helps them get what they want. This statement says a lot. When we make our problems their problems too, then and only then will we get change. Don't marry, don't have kids, don't co-habitate. Until most men do this, talking is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 01:58 PM
1

I think you want men to just politely complain. Well, we've been doing that for decades and things have gotten worse. You know the definition of insanity, right? Doing the same thing and expecting a different result. Complaining politely doesn't work.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 01:42 PM
2

In Louisiana, you can choose, when you get married, either no-fault or fault (covenant) rules. 97% choose no-fault. Source Edit: Got it backwards. Fixed.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 01:28 PM
-1

Ever hear people complain about boy's "violent play"? Such a loaded term. If no one is being hurt, it's just play, not violence. If someone is being hurt, it's just violence, not play. There use of such term attests to the anti-male bias in society. "Those boys are playing too violently. They probably have ADHD and need medication!"
/r/MensRights25/10/10 10:49 AM
3

Another interpretation: for every girl diagnosed, 3 boys are. Boys are leading girls by 300%!
/r/MensRights25/10/10 10:27 AM
2

It has. Such stats don't consider lawn care as "house work". I dismissed the whole article because the author is working based on propaganda, not facts.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 07:42 PM
2

I don't think women get tired of riding the carousel, they just get too old and lose the sex appeal that alphas want. Only then do they conveniently decide to want betas, and then only as a retirement plan. They'd keep riding the carousel forever if they could. I have seen some anecdotal evidence that after menopause, women finally lose all interest in bad boys.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 09:22 AM
0

Democrats hate men. Republicans merely ignore us. Why do you think almost all feminists are democrats?
/r/MensRights24/10/10 08:57 AM
2

Saul Alinsky's tactic #13 in Rules for Radicals is Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. One of the reasons for the Tea Party's success is structural: they have no leader to target and demonize. The MRM needs to keep to that model since it will frustrate our opponents (feminists/liberals) as well.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 08:48 AM
2

Don't worry, your daughter won't be fooled. If your ex says bad things about you yet you only behave well in front of your daughter, she will learn first-hand that women can be the bad guys.
/r/MensRights23/10/10 12:16 PM
1

Sounds like you need a blow job yourself, or do you even have sex? Comes across as "you can't get laid", which is shaming language. For me, shaming language=downvote. Otherwise, I agree with you.
/r/MensRights23/10/10 11:06 AM
0

Not All Women Are Like You. Oh, and the shaming language at the end strongly paints you as a troll.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 05:11 AM
1

I think gender may can be overridden by social construction, much like a woman can be as strong as the average man if she works out all the time. But why put in all that work fighting nature?
/r/MensRights21/10/10 05:24 PM
3

Different pairs of girls. Very similar, but these two were in a forest. The two yesterday were in an alley.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 01:22 PM
1

Typical liberal media bias. All the "victims" of these sexist attacks are male democrats. It's just another angle to criticize republicans. The WaPo isn't about to start caring about men's issues or rights.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 10:59 AM
2

The linked article does not say that. How do you know?
/r/MensRights19/10/10 10:29 AM
3

True. Misandry goes back a very long way, but feminists have taken it to a whole new level for political purposes.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 05:18 PM
5

Just follow the links in the story I linked. They are from supposedly reputable (i.e. non-biased--HA) sources. They tell the story if you don't agree with the spin from my link directly.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 05:13 PM
3

Yup. Women "farm" men and you have realized the feminist farming methods are are not sustainable. You still want to farm us for resources, just in different ways. Ah well, as long as we get to be free-range men, that ain't too bad.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 03:36 PM
10

I've seen several times where a woman kills her intimate partner and it is officially classified as just a murder, not DV, so take those stats with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 03:14 PM
9

If you HAD wanted to destroy your ex, the laws and courts would have allowed you. It definitely speaks well of you that you didn't, but you're just one person, so that is not a reliable "solution" for all men. For the time being, men need to be much more selective in who they marry, but that is not a full solution.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 03:07 PM
5

Haven't men been complaining for decades about problems...for example their bad treatment in divorce and family court? What has it gotten us? Things have gotten worse. Being nice and polite isn't working. That is the feminine way, anyway. The male way is to be direct and confrontational--like feminists. They have co-opted our way. We need to take our masculinity back.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 03:03 PM
6

Feminists support men's rights the way the Colonel supports chicken! :-)
/r/MensRights16/10/10 02:53 PM
1

Read this story. That kind of thing only happens in a society that hates and fears men. If you can't see the demonization going on around you, I doubt we can agree on much.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 01:44 PM
6

Many have said the Men's Rights Movement might better be called the Men's Movement. I agree because we are not just fighting to change laws, but a whole society that demonizes men. I doubt all the misandrist laws we have now would exist without that demonization being first accomplished. Have NO DOUBT, much of that demonization is driven by feminism. I don't care that feminists say it's only about equal rights. Their actions clearly show it is not. Feminists started the gender wars. I think it i…
/r/MensRights16/10/10 09:59 AM
9

Joke back? Make a big show of avoiding her sometime. Like if you pass, step wayyy around her and say "I just don't want to be falsely accused of rape." Might get the point across that men will avoid her if they think she is a danger to them.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 04:25 AM
1

Hey, this ain't slashdot. :-)
/r/MensRights15/10/10 11:58 PM
-5

I agree. Stop hating women--just ignore them.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 07:52 AM
0

Speaking for myself, I don't have kids and never plan to, so the outcome of the case will have no effect on me. But in addition to that, this law probably affects very few people at all, so in the grand scheme of things, it's peanuts.
/r/MensRights12/10/10 01:37 AM
5

The law essentially says "family courts suck so bad at doing their job, we are going to allow fathers to take things to criminal courts."
/r/MensRights07/10/10 04:01 AM
2

Knowledge is power. To deny him the knowledge is to deny him the power to choose his response. She thinks she will not like his response, so she is making his choice for him. She is disrespecting him and it will go worse for her if he ever finds out than if she 'fesses up now.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 07:48 PM
6

It's not about whether she has an abortion, it's about whether she tells him. s0nicfreak's original point, I think, is that although she may can hide this drama from him, sooner or later, some other drama will come along she can't hide and that will break them up. Why delay the inevitable?
/r/MensRights03/10/10 07:42 PM
8

Don't go hunting with your wife. Better yet, don't have a wife at all.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 06:58 PM
3

His adult son and daughter testified in 2008 that the abuse never took place and they were pressured by their mother and police investigators to accuse their father. It's always the same story behind the story.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 12:41 AM
4

Boys reading skills naturally develop later than girls, yet many schools are increasing emphasis on reading skills earlier and earlier. This is bad policy that is specifically harmful to boys. Do you see that this is wrong?
/r/MensRights30/09/10 09:55 PM
0

Yet another reason to outsource. If it passes, there go a bunch of jobs overseas. This law will make everyone equal by making us all unemployed.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 03:40 AM
9

Maran: Would I allow an innocent man to sit in prison if it meant keeping children safe? Interviewer: So would you make that choice? Maran: I think so. Never have kids. Never marry. It's the only way to be sure.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 01:01 AM
1

Game is a way to get and keep the upper hand in a relationship. Knowing how to recognize and pass shit-tests is good no matter what your relationship goals are unless your relationship goal is celibacy.
/r/MensRights21/09/10 01:46 PM
-1

That ain't no fairy tale--that's real life!
/r/MensRights21/09/10 01:30 PM
1

Thanks. I can only point out one caveat. Your link doesn't seem to distinguish between virgin and non-virgin brides. Pre-marital sex with the eventual husband is less bad (divorce-rate-wise) than pre-marital sex with someone else, according to the OP. No idea how common that is, though.
/r/MensRights17/09/10 07:41 PM
2

95% of people have pre-marital sex... Do you have a source for this? It may be true where you live, but not everywhere. First, they are usually very conservative Christians - lots of church, purity balls, purity rings. This is a very small segment of the US. Secondly, because of their religious beliefs marriage means a lot to these people. As in it's sinful to divorce, etc. I think you are underestimating the population of "red" states. There must be a lot of virgin brides (at 20% divorce rate) …
/r/MensRights17/09/10 02:33 PM
0

Sexual Partner Divorce Risk. Past sexual history predicts divorce risk.
/r/MensRights17/09/10 02:13 PM
4

Gay: Estimated 1% to 6% of population Lesbian: Estimated 0.5% to 3% of population From Here (Steve Sailer)
/r/MensRights16/09/10 04:48 PM
3

For game, I recommend Roissy's Blog to start. Check his links to find other sites.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 12:43 PM
15

The only thing being raped here is the meaning of the word rape.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 07:33 AM
-2

Feminists don't just dislike things, they hate them. They use "rape" to describe these things in an attempt to get other people to hate them too. It is a form of the feminists delusion of "reality by fiat": the idea that the mere words you used to describe reality cause that reality to come into being.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 07:29 AM
5

This article was confusing and poorly written. In addition, the author completely ignores all the misandrist laws which strongly deter men from commitment in relationships.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 05:00 AM
-2

When someone does "X" that you don't like, it's "X rape". If someone spills your drink, that's "Spill Rape". This goes for other crimes. If someone steals your lunch, that's "Theft Rape". Actual rape is "Rape Rape".
/r/MensRights09/09/10 04:32 AM
8

Lots of guys would sleep w/their female profs, but expect nothing in return. I have no problem with that. Expecting a higher grade in return? That is unethical for both prof and student.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 04:21 AM
9

Exactly. This is why men should never get married. You can NEVER know someone well enough beforehand. If she turns into a batshit crazy bitch, the laws and courts give her the power to destroy you. Stay single, guys.
/r/MensRights06/09/10 05:50 AM
9

He lost most of his money and she stopped being attracted to him. What a shocker!
/r/MensRights06/09/10 04:07 AM
5

Maybe you aren't a "crazy evil golddigger" now, but how do you know how you'll feel towards your significant other in 10+ years? It is your feelings in 10 years that will determine your actions, not your promises today.
/r/MensRights06/09/10 02:41 AM
2

This article examines one way to replace the obsolete education system.
/r/MensRights04/09/10 07:12 AM
6

Feminists claim "the patriarchy" is responsible for all kind of evils in society. How could so few people be doing all this?
/r/MensRights03/09/10 09:25 PM
2

If you make what's normal into exceptional, then the exceptional becomes the new normal.
/r/MensRights03/09/10 09:20 PM
19

It's becoming increasingly clear every day that feminists cannot be trusted to treat boys and men fairly.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 02:13 AM
2

Bingo.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 10:05 AM
38

Divorce is like nuclear weapons. They "work" without ever being used.
/r/MensRights27/08/10 02:50 AM
-4

You're right. It's the bad 99% of women that give the rest of them a bad name. Women have all of society and gummint looking out for their interests. Men only have themselves. So you've got to assume ALL women are trouble until they prove otherwise, even if only a small percentage are, because the price is so high. The script is flipped from 100 years ago. Men now have to be careful and women have to prove their good intentions.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 12:35 AM
187

In the 50s, feminists called it a "hostile work environment" and sued. Do the same, or at least threaten to. These women need to know what it feels like to have natural reactions called wrong and firmly repressed under threat of a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights25/08/10 11:50 PM
1

I wonder where a 7 year-old learns shaming language?
/r/MensRights20/08/10 05:07 AM
3

Excellent comment.
/r/MensRights18/08/10 04:55 PM
2

Men and women can both be abusive if they get the upper hand in a relationship. Due to the anti-male system (VAWA, divorce industry, etc), though, women mostly have the upper hand. So, that is why you hear so much about women's abuses here--they are the ones who CAN abuse.
/r/MensRights30/07/10 01:06 AM
1

I joined at 8,787. It took just as long to get to 9000 as it did from there to 10,000. 14 hours later its at 10,025. Things are accelerating, it seems.
/r/MensRights28/07/10 11:46 PM
2

Yup, it's projection. She thinks peer-pressure impacts men to the same degree that it does women. It causes many problems among women, so these "expectations" must also be screwing up men. Wrong. She doesn't understand men.
/r/MensRights27/07/10 01:22 PM
3

Stop watching TV. TV is for women.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 04:47 AM
1

I think companies will eventually move to a "pay for task" rather than pay by-the-hour/salaried positions. i.e. they estimate the time a task should take and pay you that amount, no matter how long it takes you.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 06:35 PM
1

Yeah, it's Russel's Teapot.
/r/MensRights02/07/10 08:56 PM
5

The article doesn't make it clear, but I bet the males are former law enforcement and have a macho attitude. Also no pics there, but I bet the women are quite attractive (since they try to be picked up). Further, if the guy is putting a bunch of alpha males on the same team, he is a bad manager. The article is just another "women rule, men drool" piece, as one expects in advertisement-driven media.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 11:31 AM
3

They have a prenup which limits her to $100m, so this report is likely bogus. The theory is that they are asking for $750m initially so the can "settle" down to a reasonable $200m or so.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 10:15 AM
1

I believe there is a prenup limiting her to $100 million. I'd say this report is bogus. The theory is that they asked for $750m initially so their fallback price (probably $200m) will seem reasonable.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 06:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter