TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Great-Beyond9147 Archive

View 3 posts and 109 comments by Great-Beyond9147 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Even if what he said is true about having connections to mafia (which I think there's a good chance he's lying about), I still don't think they could or would get him released. The EU has been trying to get Romania to crack down on sex trafficking for a long time, and even the mafia understands they need to keep the EU happy. Plus I doubt they'd risk too much on this guy, I can't imagine he's necessary for any sort of operation. And Tate is starting to become a PR nightmare for Romania so they p…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 07:07 PM
2

Nobody ever said they were abolishing it, these stories are based off the Iranian attorney general making a remark basically saying "the legal system has nothing to do with the morality police", but phrased it in a way that's like "the Iranian police are the ones who started it and have shut it down". It's just a confusing comment that got misinterpreted, we don't actually know what's happening. Probably because the morality police have been less active since the protests, so he was saying that …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 04:28 AM
8

First time I've seen an unironic Nazbol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 04:14 AM
1

That's kind of how statistics work, any person can list enough characteristics about themselves for it to become extremely unlikely in a random person
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 10:16 PM
1

Lenin didn't mean the goal of socialism is to become the USSR, he meant that the goal of the USSR was to become a stateless classless society
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 10:01 PM
3

I think one problem is a lot of men are on the fence about it and don't actually know whether they actually want children or not, so the potentially permanent nature of it scares a lot of them away. Where with women it seems more of them know that they want children or don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 09:13 PM
2

What is the weirdest musical phase you have ever had? I am currently into Mongolian communist music, which I can't imagine will ever come up in a conversation unless I meet a Mongolian communist for some reason. But I probably wouldn't hear about anyone else's so I'm curious what other people's are
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 04:02 AM
1

I'd say extroverted generally, unless you fall into the "mysterious guy everyone wants to know about" archetype. Like a Don Draper type, who I definitely wouldn't call extroverted but is charismatic/interesting when they do talk. And being really attractive helps a lot of course
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 03:59 AM
2

Was it Bumble? I believe their algorithm just shows them from most-least attractive in your range no matter what. Where Tinder and Hinge and stuff have more personalized ones
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:34 AM
–

CMV: the ideal form of trolling is just acting so dumb that people question whether you're being serious but still lean toward it being serious. Rather than being offensive or insulting just for the sake of it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 02:36 AM
–

No post history, and the amount of detail suggests fetishism a lot more than embarrassment
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 02:32 AM
4

Was proud of myself for immediately knowing who this is after just reading the title
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 05:38 PM
3

I don't think you can do anything, they have to decide for themselves. But you can still take advantage of the situation, by not being desperate or simping you stand out a lot. I've seen it myself, knew a guy who was attractive but seemed to just not care about casual sex and didn't really hit on anyone ever. It just made women more interested in him and a lot made the first move.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 08:44 PM
8

Maybe in the honeymoon phase, I read that 70% of gay couples have it 3x/week in the first 3 years. But after 10 years it's only about 10% which puts them under straight relationships at that time
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 02:02 PM
7

The majority of men probably don't want sex every day either. Its hard to find numbers but I did find one that said the desire for sex "5 times a week or more" is 2.4% for women and 10.2% for men. So even if we take the about 4x multiplier for this study and apply it to yours it's still only about a quarter of men
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 01:33 PM
2

In younger and more likely to be single age ranges there are more men, but it's only like one extra guy per 25-50 women so I wouldn't think it would be noticeable at all. Also depends on location, NYC for example has more young women while west coast cities tend to have more young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 03:52 PM
5

Wtf just googled what he looks like now. He looks like he just gave his plastic surgeon a picture of the chad meme lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 01:08 AM
1

I don't buy this argument that women only like Harry and the like because of status. Of course celebrities will have more women crushing on them because a lot more people know them. But there are a lot of more masculine celebrities they could fangirl on instead
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 05:46 PM
1

Virgin C++ vs Chad Python
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 04:22 AM
2

William is still attractive except for the hair. With the amount of money he has he could easily get a wig that looks completely real. Or just shave it, everything is 100X better than the "pretty much bald but still hanging on to what's left" look
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 12:05 AM
1

Well until the last generation or 2, but Kate and Meghan didn't have any sort of political/royal status. So the royals should keep getting hotter for the rest of history unless absolute monarchy somehow makes a comeback
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 12:03 AM
–

Who would win astrology girls vs male hierarchy guys
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 03:32 AM
–

Rate 1-10
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 11:33 PM
2

Relationships maybe, or hookups with people they got feelings for, but I don't think that means that high-n reduces pair bonding or causes trauma. From what I've seen having a high n reduces the ability to pair bond through sex, but not in general. When someone does have less pair bonding it's usually caused by heartbreaks, depending on the number of them and how severe. But I don't think just having sex for fun causes it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 05:56 PM
4

I think there's a difference between being a feminist and proactively identifying yourself as one. Like I've met men who could be described as feminists who are perfectly well-adjusted and intelligent. But you wouldn't know unless you inferred it from conversations or asked them. The ones that go around telling everyone they are feminist tend to be the kinds of people in the male feminist memes. I think this also applies for other political labels in general, if you tell people without asking it…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 04:59 PM
1

I mean some men kinda do the same thing, they talk about how women just have to exist and they can get a hot rich guy to marry or whatever. When that is only an option for the top % of women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 06:22 PM
5

His posts really come off like he's just trying to think of himself as attractive despite being rejected, and using pill logic to do so. When he should be using real world logic to realize you don't have to be super attractive to be happy or have a good relationship. OP I know you don't like hearing this but you really should post your pics or PM them to someone trusted here and have them rate you because it just comes off like you are overestimating yourself. I mean none of the really attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:41 PM
–

I am a 6'12 trillionaire professional model who is a psychologist in my free time, and I swear I can't take on female clients anymore. They refuse to listen to anything I say, they just repeat everything in a mocking tone, because they say FDS told them that I am a man so nothing I say matters. I ask them with tears in my eyes why they follow such a hateful ideology, and every time they just laugh at me and say that it's because men are responsible for everything negative in the world and they w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 09:34 PM
2

Yeah testosterone causes longer eyelashes, ironic that the ones that get better ones are the ones that mostly don't care about it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 06:21 PM
5

I think beauty itself is considered a feminine trait, so any man considered beautiful will also probably be seen as feminine to some extent
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 06:20 PM
4

Before modern wars it was even more, I think I read in the world wars like 90+% of soldiers would intentionally miss but that was from not wanting to kill anyone as opposed to a skill thing
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:07 PM
3

I've never actually seen this, except on social media maybe. But I would guess it's because women have not been historically considered to choose based on physical attraction and are expected to be less sexual in general, so it's just saying what a lot of them feel. Where for men everybody already knows it so it can come off as douchey for them to remind everyone. But I don't think anyone is actually shamed for liking hot people, that's just a fact of biology
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:39 PM
7

Well most of that is just attractiveness privilege, which men can also benefit from. Granted not all of it (getting gifts in particular I think is more of a gendered thing), and there are probably a lot less men who get it, but it still comes from being attractive as opposed to gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:35 PM
6

Whatever happened to all the posts that were like "Q4W would you rather be executed by lethal injection by an ugly guy or by a firing squad of hot guys"? Life feels empty without them tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 09:09 PM
1

Oh I see, yeah I was talking about the 3 in one of them. Looked like they did the same thing though in both
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 01:24 PM
1

In the first one yeah, in the second (and third but not sure if you're talking about that one) they say they had standardized responses. 1 was done in person and 2&3 online so that might've influenced it also
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 12:26 PM
6

They are measuring "responsiveness" which they mean is how nice/understanding they are. Basically they had one participant talk about something negative that happened in their lives and the other person would respond. In the one that found women are neutral they just had people talk with each other with no further instructions and analyzed afterward, in the one that had negative correlation they had pre-planned responses ("I'm sorry that happened to you, that must've been hard" vs "Why did you p…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 09:17 PM
3

Idk I've definitely seen autistic women struggle with finding someone who wants them long-term. Even ones who were pretty attractive, if they're still awkward then a lot of guys won't see them as the person they want to end up with
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 03:15 AM
0

We are slaves to our hunter-gatherer biology, which did not include the women=reproduction men=labor thing. That started at absolute most 12k years ago with the invention of agriculture. For the other 290k years of our history men and women were both needed to forage. And there is not much hard labor you can do with 0 technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 07:37 AM
2

You have to keep in mind who the "men are slaves to women" talk comes from, pretty much all of that comes from straight men, and because we are in a pill community a disproportionate amount of them will have had bad experiences with women. Ask the scientists and inventors who actually built society why they did it, it's because of intense curiosity and a desire to make something, not for women (the workaholic who forgoes relationships is a trope for a reason). These guys feel that women have thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 07:11 AM
1

I've made comments about this before but the problem with the evopsych stuff is you can just as convincingly make arguments that support the complete opposite. Given the population growth we've seen in the last century it seems like population growth is way more correlated with advancement and stability than just fertility rates, and because in this worldview men contributed most to those things shouldn't that mean men are more valued by society? Or given that women have limited reproductive cap…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:57 AM
2

Coach red pill, an American sexpat youtuber who moved to Ukraine, makes videos defending Putin and blaming the US/Russia for the war. Gets thrown out of his hotel in Kiev with them saying he's a Russian propagandist, claims he isn't. Keeps talking about Putin's genius and how Zelensky is evil. Has to go to Kharkiv and still makes videos saying he's not sure the Russians are responsible for the shelling there. Ends up on Russian state TV and possibly Ukrainian state TV as well. Gets death threats…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 03:33 PM
0

Q4 UKers: did the Ukraine invasion save Boris? It seemed like there was a good chance he would be voted out with the party stuff, but now it's obviously not on people's minds as much anymore. Is he more popular because of this or is it just temporary unity and it will start again once it's over?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:41 PM
1

Yeah the Germans call it Weißrussland, which is just translating "white Russia" instead of using the Russian name
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:02 PM
1

It's an older name for it in the West, Belarus is just the shortened form. Belorussia just means "white Russia", this is what the USSR republic was called. The independent Belarus chose that name to make it sound less Russian, by not including the full "Russia" and using Bela- vs Belo- (Belarusian vs Russian)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:00 PM
6

So anyone can go fight for Ukraine now, all you have to do is go to your country's embassy and they'll get you over there and arm you and stuff!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 06:04 PM
1

Because it doesn't make much sense to do so, he doesn't really gain anything by just annexing it all while looking way worse than if he just installs a puppet government and leaves. This whole thing seems like it's driven more by his paranoia and security concerns than irredentism, else he would have done this before Ukraine became pro-West
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 04:51 PM
1

There are a huge number of Russian speakers there who support Russia, most don't but it is significant. But they don't want to occupy it, just get rid of the government and set up Ukraine the way they want and then leave. I seriously doubt there will be a lengthly occupation of territories that aren't Russian-majority
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 03:16 PM
1

Idk I think he would just take Kiev if he's already right next to it. He definitely wants to get the current government out so he might have to take the whole country because presumably they will move to Lviv. He wants a federalized Ukraine where regions hold all the power, so pro-Russian regions can go with Russia and would basically make it impossible to join NATO, and make the country too weak to pose a threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 06:14 AM
1

Or just learn what the individual woman you want values and focus on those, or just find who's compatible with you. It's not like all women want all of these categories equally, some don't care about some of them and some only care about others. It will get you a lot farther than neurotically trying to be the best in every single way. I mean we could keep adding categories, best physique, funniest, most charismatic, hardest working, most friends, etc. and soon it's impossible for anyone on Earth…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 08:19 PM
1

I throw darts at a picture of Woodrow Wilson every day
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 08:04 PM
2

You did mention white women specifically when it's famously not race related. It's income related, which is why Japan probably has the biggest problem with this in the world
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 08:03 PM
1

I wouldn't call war arousing, I think it's just that they get such a hatred of the other side that they don't see them as people anymore. It can be done out of a desire for revenge as well as ethnic cleansing in some cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 07:36 PM
-1

But it's not realistic to hope to be the best in all categories. Let's say there is an average of 10 sexual partners, and consider attractiveness, money, status, dick size, and height. Assuming it's all random there is now a 1/100,000 chance you are the best in every category
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 07:04 PM
1

I mean I would think the vast majority of men have the chance at some point in their lives, and if that were true then the vast majority of women would experience it which obviously isn't true. And you can't really read into other animals to say something about humans, in some species it is practically universal while in others it's practically nonexistant.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 06:00 PM
8

Are there no men here who also prefer to wait to have sex when you see someone as relationship material? I always have, when I really like someone I don't want to do anything that could jeopardize it. Like my gf and I didn't hook up for like a month after we were hanging out pretty much every day, and we both have high-ish n counts and it was obvious we were attracted to each other. Doing it right away ruins all the fun tension also
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 08:13 PM
4

I'd say it's somewhat balanced out by the fact that women naturally hold on to more fat, so getting really fit can be harder. It's also a reason men tend to not live as long, because weight gain with age is very common and for men it just goes right by your heart and lungs and stuff, so it can cause them to fail faster than for women
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 10:23 PM
4

They only get laid more because they're aggressive and approach a ton of people. But their rejection rate is probably a lot higher than a nice person with comparable attractiveness. The guy I know who got the most interest was very attractive but also very nice and kinda shy
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 10:26 PM
6

Tbh I think faces with a mix of masculine/feminine features are most attractive for both genders. Like a lot of female models have strong jaws and pointed eyes and stuff, and a lot of the male ones have pointed chins/full lips, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 08:41 PM
2

Women's attraction is based on perpetuating their genes just like men's is. They have to be more selective due to limited capacity for reproduction but at the end of the day men and women want the best genes to combine with their own, because that is the best outcome for passing your own genes on. It's not the only factor of course, also in consideration are what they can realistically get and what the environment/upbringing for children will be and other stuff. Also sex serves somewhat of a soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 08:51 PM
1

What are we even talking about when saying "value"? However you would define it would be an oversimplification, but especially the way it's used here as some sort of mashup between romantic and economic value. Assuming we're talking about that then I still don't see how it's a gender thing, people generally want the best partner they can get, which sometimes involves trading things like wealth/beauty/etc. I don't know what world it is where every beautiful woman is automatically catapulted to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 12:50 AM
6

Is Christmas the ultimate betabux shit test? Think about it, santa is the personification of cuckoldry. Providing for every single child alive and being genetically related to exactly 0 of them and getting no sex out of it. And this propaganda tricks fathers into providing for free, it must've been made up by our gynocentric society for this reason. I decided to show my wife who's boss and stole all of our kids presents and sold them on the secondary market, and plan to use the money to start a …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 07:10 PM
2

For chimps I think it's true. I might be remembering some other ape but I thought about chimps I read that there is pretty much no female choice, like they do not care who they mate with and the males have to guard them to make sure the offspring are theirs. Bonobos are the opposite where pretty much all of it is female choice I think. I would guess humans to be somewhere between the two but I think most of it is driven by female choice, or women would not be selective like chimp females. We wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 09:06 PM
2

Well if duck rape is so common to the point their sexual organs evolved that way and it happens to every single one than it's probably also true they evolved to not find it traumatic at all, probably just an annoyance to them
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 08:21 PM
2

Q4a how do you explain what PPD is to a friend you think would be interested without sounding like a complete psycho
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:32 PM
3

Think she means some women experience it too, but logically they know that banging a stranger is probably a bad idea and that overrides the attraction. I think some men get it too except the reason is that they know they are probably getting rejected instead of not wanting to have sex
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 05:17 PM
2

Well yeah they have reproductive leverage by virtue of actually carrying the child, but that doesn't really have anything to do with if women were submissive to men. I don't think patriarchal societies were actively planned for dating purposes, it really only came about after the invention of agriculture. Which started specialization and jobs that only men did, so the women took on more homemaking/parental roles, and the gender roles sorta developed from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:42 PM
2

Yeah I think there can be legitimate study of it by academics, but the way people use it on reddit is just trying to justify what they want to be true. Obviously you can just make up a bunch of contradictory nonsense and make it sound just as convincing as the way it's used here. I would compare it to people who are convinced they know psychology because they took a MBTI test and found out they're a good creative hardworking person etc
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 09:21 PM
7

I have used my evopsych powers to figure out the truth about gender dynamics once and for all. I will share my findings here. -Women only prefer alpha males because they can get more resources. -Men only prefer attractive women because they can get the best genetics for their children. -Women only prefer beta males because they are more likely to care for the child, and alpha is an unstable position and more likely to get challenged and expelled from the group. There weren't really alpha males i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 10:20 PM
3

Evolution doesn't do what benefits the population as a whole, they only do what gives the best chance of passing your specific genes down. Altruistic behavior only evolves when it suits this, for example if someone sacrifices themself for their family it is because the benefit of having them pass down your genes outweighs the cost of yourself. Men and women's reproductive strategies obviously conflict to some extent, which evolved that way because it gave them the best chance at success. So bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 09:44 PM
6

Well if it's natural urges than what is the evopsych for why they evolved that way? Being completely submissive to men would be putting their interests above their own which is not how evolution works
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:31 AM
1

Idk, if women weren't attracted to their partners for most of history they probably wouldn't have evolved to want to select partners based on attraction. And if they could never choose their partners they probably wouldn't have evolved the desire to select partners at all
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/21 06:41 AM
2

Idk if I agree that narcs or feminists are any more or less attractive on average, but I do think that we have some ability to predict personality based on physical features. Like a lot of the time we think that someone looks creepy or like an asshole and a lot of times it turns out to be correct. Probably because different hormone levels can change facial features as well as personality. I imagine we evolved some sort of ability for this because it would give you an advantage to be able to quic…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/21 09:50 PM
2

Yeah culturally they are very similar, I would compare it to Germany/Austria or Australia/New Zealand. Lots of differences but to outsiders they are effectively the same thing from their perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 08:29 PM
2

Is anyone else angry that Einstein wasted his life on that pointless gravity nonsense instead of unlocking the secrets of female attraction? Like I don't need a bunch of fancy equations to tell me I won't randomly float into space and die, but could know how I can bang hot women everyday as a 2/10 with no social skills
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 07:25 PM
–

My DMV just asked you your height and put what you said. My friend got his height listed as 6'7 when he is like 6'1, guess the worker didn't care that day
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 12:21 AM
1

I wouldn't necessarily call it male sexuality, short term relationships were obviously part of our evolution or it wouldn't be a thing. Male sexuality would be banging everyone they can, but when women do it they usually want a smaller amount of attractive men, which would serve the function of getting the best genes for potential children even if they're not likely to commit long term
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/21 04:41 AM
2

Is it better to date someone really similar to yourself or different? I think long-term it's better to be able to complement each other and cancel out each other's weaknesses, but it feels like a much deeper connection if you have the same interests and struggles etc., but it would be harder to work on those problems
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 07:50 PM
2

Q4All: How attractive are you or people you are close with facially and how often do you/they typically get sick? Apparently a big part of why we find certain faces attractive has to do with signals of immune health, which makes sense as for most of human history like half of all humans died of disease before adulthood. I'm curious if it's actually noticeable today in adulthood
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 07:01 PM
1

Well I don't think the point of the body positive thing is to say that obesity and such is more attractive, it's to say that you shouldn't feel bad about it. There could be a similar movement for men if they really wanted it, but I don't think men struggle as much as women with body image stuff on average. If the dating market means that they can land someone out of their league then more power to them, but I'm not sure how prevalent that is irl. Most of the tall attractive men I see are dating …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 05:20 PM
10

It started with the FDS podcast, where the latest episode brought on a conservative pro-Trump woman. The women who brought her on wanted to hear from women with a variety of opinions, but were not American and probably did not understand how heated US politics are. This caused a backlash from their overwhelmingly left-wing users, and their mods acted like mods and deleted some posts critical of the decision, so there was a backlash against them too. They are now divided between people who want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 07:06 PM
7

Well testosterone seems to be the biggest factor in males at least. Prolactin only works by decreasing the level of testosterone. Estrogen seems to be the biggest factor in females as well as maybe a factor in males to increase sex drive, testosterone for females doesn't conclusively cause sex drive. Like some drugs that lower testosterone in males are known reduce their sex drive to below that of the average woman, even though their testosterone is still several times higher. But everyone is di…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/21 06:21 PM
3

I had something similar (not much lately for some reason), I ended up going to a cardiologist to be sure and everything checked out fine. If you don't get lightheaded or anything it means your heart is still pumping blood effectively so not likely it would be something to worry about
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:55 AM
6

Do we really need comments on every "x is unattractive in men" post saying it doesn't matter if they're attractive enough? Like that goes without saying pretty much, it would be like commenting on money advice posts saying that it doesn't matter if they're a billionaire. It doesn't make it any less valid, and the amount of men attractive enough to get away with pretty much anything is way less than 20%
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 12:22 AM
5

I think these men/women have more power posts miss the point, which is that whoever wants the other person less has power over them. I think on average men want women more than women want them, and women will probably want a top 1% chad more than they want them. But in most relationships there are other factors that play into this than just raw sexual attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 03:39 AM
2

What is the evolutionary reason for people taking pictures with hot strangers? I went out with my super attractive friend and it's the second time I've seen complete strangers come take a picture with him. And they don't stay to talk or anything, just take it and leave
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 12:16 AM
5

I mean there's guys who stay in deadbedroom marriages for a long time, and sex is a need for a lot of women in relationships also. Biologically the most successful strategy is for both parents to invest in their children. But the problem with that evopsych stuff is that you could also just as easily say that women also are not biologically suited for relationships, because sleeping around would get resources from multiple males and also get the best genetics for their children (which was a matte…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 07:26 PM
10

It's not in a SJW way lol, it is saying that sexual reproduction is less efficient quantity-wise vs asexual reproduction. So there has to be a reason most species turned out to use sexual
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 06:34 PM
2

I think the second part causes the first actually, if they never hit on women I think they assume that it's impossible to build attraction and it's mostly based on looks, because that is how they feel attraction and have never experienced anything else. So then they think that only the top 5% can get female attention, because men have to be at that level to get it spontaneously
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 07:35 AM
1

If you want a relationship with someone who makes you happy then yes, and even if you want casual sex that's still attainable for average men, whether it's worth it depends on how much rejection hurts you and how much work you want to put into it. It is not worth it if you want effortless casual sex and a lot of female attention, but that also applies for above average men (unless they are like model-tier or maxed out on status)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 04:02 AM
4

Capitalism literally has a higher approval rating in "communist" China and Vietnam than in the US
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 04:38 AM
2

The reasonable baseline is just around your own level. Most relationships are assortative when it comes to looks, class, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 06:43 PM
9

Well why not go for the people who put themselves through college working at the same time? Best of both worlds. And the people who are lazy and have bad character don't tend to finish. It seems you are thinking of the conservative stereotype for college students, most of them aren't actually hyper-emotional or even really political, they are just normal people just like those who didn't go to college. Also they do have to get into the real world eventually, why does it matter when? By that logi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 06:41 PM
5

I only know two promiscuous women, one is like that where she will only sleep with 8s or 9s but the other is less selective looks-wise and it's more about the vibe or whatever. But it makes sense to be like that when you have a huge amount of options and physical attraction is the only thing that matters for casual, just depends on how they experience physical attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 04:21 AM
3

If the definition of chad is getting casual sex with pretty much 0 effort then that's a tiny percentage of men. Like I have met one guy in my entire life who was attractive enough for that, and it's definitely not enough to skew the whole market
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 06:49 PM
9

In some circles yes, but most people still meet through friends and it develops from there. Reading the pill communities can make it seem like a lot worse than it really is and that looks/status are the only thing that matters, which can be true in the big cities and such but certainly not everywhere. I lived in Germany for work for a while and it really wasn't drastically different, it did seem more relaxed and there was less hookup culture but it was still there for some people. And it was kin…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 07:48 PM
0

The US is western, it just means having influence from the Greeks, Romans, Germanics and Christianity. Has nothing to do with capitalism
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 06:33 PM
4

I don't think it's high standards in general though, just for OLD. They don't react as much to pictures which are missing key information which is used in evaluating partners. Which means that it will take an extremely attractive guy to overcome that, but it doesn't mean that only they can be successful in general
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 07:40 PM
1

ADHD does tend to run with autism and a lot of professionals think they're related. I think it's just social awkwardness and high-inhib traits that are seen as unattractive. I knew someone with Aspergers who was very outgoing, he did miss some social cues and could be a little awkward at times but it didn't seem to hurt him much
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 07:29 PM
1

Women also inherit male pattern baldness, it's just they have way less testosterone so it happens slowly enough that it's not noticeable usually. But some have higher testosterone, or their hair is especially sensitive to even a small amount
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 08:51 PM
1

That and you can't really just boil it down to oxytocin=bonding, feelings and brain processes are super complex involving a lot of different chemicals and parts of the brain working together. It's like how people view dopamine=pleasure, but it also causes nausea, lactation, and other things depending on the context
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 08:48 PM
1

I think it's around 50% success rate for reversal, and depends on how long it's been. But they can also still extract sperm and do IVF, or just get sperm frozen beforehand
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 07:04 PM
1

If women thought looks were more important they would be automatically attracted to any above-average man like men are for women, not just model-level types. And for the other things I'm not talking about provider traits, more like status and game and presentation (I'm not RP but those things do matter). I'll put it this way: how many men have you met that get women approaching them and literally have to do nothing? Now how many have you met that are successful with women in general? If physical…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 05:31 PM
–

Yeah the threshold is pretty low relatively, the black pillers just discount that other things can make men attractive. Only the top like 1-5% of men are attractive enough where women are interested in them because of looks alone. But the conclusion they make is "women 's standards are so high that they only want models" instead of "women place less emphasis on looks so it will take a very attractive man for them to be interested just from looks"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 06:43 PM
3

I think both genders mean different things when they say the other is more shallow, women mean that men care about looks far more than anything else, and men mean that women find a small amount of men physically attractive the way they find women. But women can be attracted by other things, men just view it through the lens of their own attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 07:05 PM
4

I don't think anyone's simping for fat ugly bitter women, and there are really not many of them. Most are pleasant enough to be around just like men. And I have traveled outside the West and the women act pretty much the same everywhere, also just like men do
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 04:47 AM
–

Movie idea: takes place post-beta uprising, the country is now ruled by an incel one-party dictatorship. Our protagonist is a 3/10 man who has just completed his blackpill indoctrination and is assigned his state-mandated gf. They start out hating each other but discover they have a lot in common and fall in love. She convinces him that the system is evil and needs to be overthrown. They start building an army out of the women and underground bluepillers. They get more people by breaking the pri…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 10:42 PM
–

I'd say it's different for every woman and not a hard limit, it's more if the attraction from looks and game passes a certain threshold, except at the extremes (a 1/10 probably won't do it even with 10/10 game, and a 10/10 model won't need much of it if any)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 08:38 PM
–

I think there are a subset of women that experience physical attraction more intensely, and therefore will mostly go for looks and also have more casual sex. I think that's the source of a lot of confusion about this, because it means that very good looking guys won't have to try much and also that most women aren't aroused by just looks at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 08:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter