TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GreatDeityZeus Archive

View 1 post and 77 comments by GreatDeityZeus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
47

Social IssuesGreatDeityZeus/r/MensRights27/05/18 12:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes. I believe I stated that.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 09:20 AM
-2

I disagree. If she consented to sex with a condom and he took it off as alleged or she said he couldn't cum inside her and he purposefully did then he did rape her. I also think if a man goes into sex with a woman who says she's on the pill and would get an abortion in case of failure and doesn't follow through that she should be charged with rape.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:21 AM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:09 PM
5

Which works unless she pokes holes in it before giving it to you. Or she rapes you, then you have the pleasure of paying your rapist for 18 years.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:00 PM
7

Unless they put themselves out there. Otherwise we wouldn't know the names of many of Cosby's alleged victims, Same for Weinstien.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:35 AM
1

You mean like how do I know she doesn't call herself his wife or him her husband? Because she uses the terms boyfriend and girlfriend instead. And they would both have to do so, even she isn't at this point.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 11:24 AM
1

Not for her as it isn't her money.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 11:23 AM
1

This isn't a life changing situation for her. It is still HIS asset, not in any way hers. AIDS or HIV on the other hand does have a huge impact on the other party. There is no comparison to be made here.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:24 PM
1

8 years and they're still separate individuals. I get it, you don't understand that very simple concept. She's not a wife, not even common law as that requires holding yourself out as married. He has his business that's private and so does she.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:22 PM
1

I do think it's fair in comparison. That kind of money would be more life changing than you're giving it credit for. How does her not knowing about the money kill her? If your answer is "it doesn't" then it's not a fair comparison.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:18 AM
2

He didn't do it behind her back. 4.8 million is likely a lifetime sum not just the last 8 years. It could be it started as an inheritance or other windfall before she ever came in the picture. This is a personal account held by an unmarried individual. There is nothing wrong except he's got a nosy girlfriend.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:17 AM
3

Upvote for good Fathers. Also for good dad quotes (Courtesy of my late, great Father) Sheath your dagger before you jag her (Somehow mom thought his sex talk should have been more in depth) If it's a result of your own actions don't look for sympathy, if you want sympathy it's in the dictionary between shit and syphilis. Use your head for more than a hat rack. And many more.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:58 PM
10

So it's OK with you for female genital mutilation to occur?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:54 AM
4

Opening doors Not just literally, but also figuratively, by giving women the opportunities they deserve. Both sexes should be holding open doors literally and figuratively you have to prove yourself before getting the opportunity if you're waiting for it to be given to you then the problem you're having is your own entitled attitude. Being punctual Gentlemen are strict about punctuality because they know that being late is disrespectful to the people waiting for them. How is this gendered? Shoul…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 11:50 AM
4

Hitler used a left wing platform because that's who he was, it's what he truly believed. Go ahead and pick up those causes but that's where it comes from. It was progressives from California that helped shape the the Nazi Eugenics programs for Christ sake.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 08:13 PM
1

That last bit is damn near suicidal for all the officers involved.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:42 PM
3

Ask or force? Does the father have the right to refuse?
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:00 PM
8

Most of those go both ways and 19 is idiotic, no one should be playing gatekeeper to your family relationships.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:11 AM
15

You don't understand it she didn't feel like she could say no to this completely voluntary exchange.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 12:08 PM
6

I think it means the wife's affair partner can be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 05:37 PM
3

Women ARE IN FACT victims of systematic male oppression. Proof of this in the United States?
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:19 PM
4

No he's advocating very left wing methodology.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:11 AM
2

Wrong, that is an outright lie. I am suggesting government remove children from abusive and neglectful homes in order to protect them. Why do you want children abused?
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:20 AM
1

No I am suggesting they take children from unfit parents as they should.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:19 AM
1

No one gives a shit what you'd rather do. Just like you don't give a shit I would rather people not abuse children in any way including this method. You prefer child abuse, I prefer responsible people. Different strokes.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:46 AM
3

If you are impoverished and bring a child into the world that is malfeasance because you are ill equipped to care for that helpless child.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:44 AM
1

This isn't trafficking you stupid worthless cunt it's removal of the child from an abusive home. Did you not get that it's about someone who chooses to bare a child with no means of supporting It? Would you rather it fucking starve or wallow in it's own filth?
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:18 AM
2

Not steal but rather take for the good of the child. You would rather leave children in a home purposely made bad rather than see children be in a good home?
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:14 AM
3

Garnish the mother's paycheck to the point she's on subsistence level living. Second I don't think you realize the number of people who want infants, it's generally older kids that have trouble being placed.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:58 AM
2

I'd say the children should go to foster care or be put up for adoption rather than be left with purposely bad parents.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:51 AM
1

Just don't allow welfare to mom's who knowingly go into single motherhood. Frankly welfare should be cut off now if you're a recipient and turn up pregnant.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:28 AM
21

Maturity of Holdo? You mean the person who could have prevented all the deaths with a simple act of letting a trusted captain in the rebellion know her plan but instead chose nana nana nana I'm not telling and set the events in motion?
/r/MensRights21/12/17 01:25 PM
3

Han Solo is a secondary character in Luke's story. Yes the supporting cast is mostly male and doesn't get developed near as well as Jynn.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:51 PM
3

Secondary characters to Rey and Jynn Ers. Kind of proves his point.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:25 AM
1

Feminism for saying rape is bad no matter who commits it and following up with statistics on victims and perps.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:19 AM
12

I didn't know there was a racial component.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 10:46 PM
8

Racism?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 10:23 PM
1

Well seeing as how I am married with a Child that is biologically mine I'm not entirely sure I still qualify as a Virgin. I have dismissed nothing other than this is some kind of assault on men's rights. I think we should wrap up things like custody and divorce issues before taking on the sexist tribes of Hyrule. Perhaps your focus on your own virginity is hindering your ability to lose it.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:47 PM
3

If this is your biggest worry in life then I think you're doing pretty good. It's just a game mechanic and you have to fool them to get in.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 11:21 AM
4

So female singers don't draw a crowd and it's sexism t he her wants to have customers?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:44 PM
4

Accusations should be.... investigated. I dont know whether any accusations are true or false until there is evidence.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 02:07 PM
12

with the passing of California's recent (practical) decriminalization of knowingly transmitting HIV to someone, Seriously? What possible justification is there to that?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:47 PM
7

So he has to be able to afford $3500 And not be in debt and she just has to not be debt?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 12:10 PM
65

If that's the case how are women to prove financial solvency for this investment?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:22 PM
3

Red Hulk was when he debuted.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:11 PM
3

Besides the possible lawsuits, notoriety, or feelings of power.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:00 PM
0

I thought Bill O'Reilly was vehemently denying the accusations against him.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:29 AM
6

I have trouble understanding that viewpoint, how can you make responsible decisions if you don't know the facts.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 02:56 PM
15

The only issue I would have is start sex ed in middle or even late elementary school.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:42 AM
2

Feminists normally give the 8% false accusation star. They also give 3% conviction rate for accused rapists.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:41 PM
5

The numbers feminists normally peddle are around 8% proven false allegations meaning we have certainty in only 11% of accusations with more than double the proven true accusations being absolutely false.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:26 PM
5

Only 3% of rape accusations are proven true.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:14 PM
2

How was it a setup? She was unconscious and there's absolute proof he sit touch her then. He's a scumbag, that doesn't mean any other person shouldn't be heavily scrutinized when making such claims.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 06:42 PM
25

Plenty of people made fun of Vice President Pence for his comments regarding following that rule but it's beginning to look like he was the smartest person in the room. On a side note did anyone else see Billy Graham and think of Superstar Billy Graham from WWF? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstar_Billy_Graham
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:17 AM
2

groping their breasts, buttocks or genital areas.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:07 AM
1

Yeah you do and I understand. Work on your act a bit though.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:45 PM
-1

You're never going to admit sexual assault is wrong and I'm always going to be against it. My guess is the reason you swing so hard in favor of sexual assault is you are a hardcore Democrat and therefore feel a need to protect your own rather than look at the situation objectively. I understand the emotional deficiency here so I'm going to end it by saying I am still against sexual assault including this one and I accept that you are for it and I hope that one day you are able to overcome your l…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:36 AM
-1

He's touching her in the photo and admitted to the actions in the photo. You should take your own advice. The only question is why do you condone and endorse sexual assault?
/r/MensRights19/11/17 12:59 AM
-1

Liar. Clearly he's touching her and admitted it himself because he thought it was funny and you are defending a scumbag.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 06:15 PM
1

Not all accusations should be taken at face value but when a man says he got his jollies making her miserable for the whole tour it should be given extra weight. And it's possible the WWE guy and Sulu are guilty but on their faces there's far more room for doubt when this is like threading a needle.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:59 PM
1

But he's not. He gets on a sanctimonious high horse about sexual harassment knowing he's guilty himself in today's environment where it's sure to bite him in the add? Not an intelligent man. As for why the pic, he said himself he enjoyed harassing her and thought it was funny.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:37 PM
1

Franken himself admits to touching her here and thought the sexual assault was funny. If this were the case wouldn't he produce the photos (as they were all given the CDs) He said himself he thought it was hilarious to harass her, is it really far fetched to believe he's just a shitty person? I'd recommend that if we are looking for false accusations we look at the David Otunga/Jennifer Hudson situation or perhaps George Takei. Franken seems guilty here.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 04:23 PM
-1

Not when he's touching her in the picture as he clearly is. Only 2 fingers are off her.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:09 PM
-1

He is leaning in towards her and does not dispute that he inappropriately touched her. He does say he doesn't remember the rehearsal as she does. But I will say in his statement on this very matter he says we should listen to women which is pretty damning in it's own right. I get the impulse to defend every man when accused I have that impulse myself with Senator Franken until I looked at what was presented. When you grow up you'll learn that not everyone is a good person and guilty people exist…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 08:50 PM
-1

I am the only one being objective in Fair by looking at the photo something you have yet to do. I have explained multiple times the facts of the situation and how it is wrong while you continue to say sexual assault is just a joke and ok because of what the woman is wearing.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 06:04 PM
0

I am sticking to the facts including the fact that you said the flak jacket makes it okay In This Very post. I didn't put words in your mouth you said them voluntarily. What the Senator did is absolutely wrong and you are defending him. And no what she was wearing does not make this okay.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 05:53 PM
0

I'm not the one shying away from Facts here you are. In your own delusional attempt to defend this man you were ignoring the picture in front of you. He is clearly touching her and what she's wearing doesn't make that okay. I know you believe that because she was wearing that jacket it's okay that he touched her in a sexual manner while she was unconscious but it's never okay no matter what she's wearing unless he got prior consent.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:28 PM
1

He is making contact with her with multiple fingers as he's moving towards her. You are defending and obviously guilty man and that is not something we should be doing. We should look at the evidence objectively and fairly because otherwise by doing as you are we tank our own credibility as a movement.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:17 PM
0

No. This discussion here is about a woman lying and claiming she was kissed and groped without permission when she was not. The picture clearly shows him touching her, youre defending a guilty man. We should speak up and demand fair hearings for everyone but should not ever shy away and ignore facts.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:07 PM
0

You're making excuses. What she was wearing doesn't matter. He was touching her as you admitted. Is touching the breasts on an unconscious woman ok or not? That's the only question here.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 01:38 PM
0

Actually that's exactly what it shows, andbit being a flak jacket doesn't matter, what does is he's touching someone's body nonconsensually. Is that okay or not?
/r/MensRights17/11/17 01:24 PM
1

If it's okay because she was wearing a flak jacket that leaves the question where the line is that he stops getting a pass. What if it's a winter coat is that still okay? How about a heavy sweatshirt or lighter fall jacket? I am not willing to condone feeling up a sleeping person the way he did and brush it off as a joke. I didn't think you were being rude but you are condoning what happened and that is wrong.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:23 PM
1

Now you're just moving away from the original argument to try and make your point valid. The complaint was kissing without permission, not kissing more than was allowed, or kissing inappropriately. You said she agreed, I'm pointing out even if she agreed to a rehearsed kiss it isn't what she got hence she didn't agree. There was no consent to what he allegedly did. Do you know what a flack jacket is? Yes and what she was wearing doesn't matter, do you not understand? What I am saying is that wha…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:38 AM
3

Did she agree to tongue? Did she agree to be aggressively grabbed as she claims she was? No. Not to mention the fact that touching her at all is incredibly wrong while she's sleeping. False allegations exist but so do real assaults and even Franken isn't really denying this or calling her a liar. Let's let this one play out. He should have a fair hearing but this looks bad to me. To me it looks like his left forefinger and right pinky are up but the rest are on her breasts on top of her clothing…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:09 AM
0

It looks as if his right hand is touching. In the article it also says she was supposed to turn her head and he didn't allow that. Let's not lie if we are to be able to credibly accuse others of doing so.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:44 AM
2

Everyone is worthy of due process.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 09:11 PM
-3

I was prepared to say we should wait for evidence bit there's a photo of him fondling a sleeping woman.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 06:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter