TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GrednP Archive

View 3 posts and 22 comments by GrednP on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I don't care what Bill Cosby fans say, I still say Norm is the funniest comedian alive. Jokes aside, yes he's still the funniest -- funnier than Larry David, other Jews etc; funnier than Steven Steagal (I just learned that he's also a Jew, oy); and funnier than Dave Chapelle, George Carlin, Bill Hicks, Lenny Bruce and...well maybe not that last bunch, but yep, funnier in terms of "ha ha" funny. Young comedians, watch, and learn.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 01:55 AM
68

Portugese people can be white or "people of color" depending on time of day/week/year etc. Don't feel bad, Asians are the same way. And it could be worse: you could be a straight white male...living in a trailer Park...and literally just killed and barbecuede the possum he caught for dinner....who turns on their old TV, and has to listen to the laments of billionaire "people of color."
/r/MensRights12/09/18 01:30 AM
7

You did not merely assert that women have social power but that they have always had more of it than men. Not always; often, yeah I think that's probably true. But in hunter-gatherer societies men have more social status. And they die much younger. So in a state of nature, I guess a balance develops. Under civilization, well, we're seeing it :0
/r/MensRights12/09/18 01:08 AM
9

TLDR; it would have been dumb for nature to give men all the power, and nature isn't dumb, though it makes mistakes about every 1 to the power of trillions micro-seconds. Women have plenty of power beyond just the sexual. History proves it. Social power is key. Therefore we should recognize female power and act accordingly. I think that's a pretty concise summary and I'm alarmed that you consider the idea of female social power controversial. Talk about fucking blue-pilled.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 12:42 AM
10

Well, Susan B. Anthony argued as much in the mid 19th century, and I think she was right for the most part. I did say "typically," not in every instance. When women set about their quest to pass prohibition, a minority of women organized into what amounted to a "social-shaming" squadron. They didn't lose a single life in battle, yet they managed to take on massive corporate interests and alter the American constitution. Of course they had some powerful men on their side, but again the support of…
/r/MensRights11/09/18 11:08 PM
5

They will become aware, in the near future. It will be impossible not to.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 08:25 PM
1

Favouring women I was thinking more of the "favouring women" part.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:48 AM
18

Dayuuuum. That was brutal. But fair.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 01:13 AM
1

Killer duo's: b>Ian Brady and >Myra> Hindley Fred and Rosemary West Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka Plenty of others... This is one case where feminists won't demand that "ladies come first" (You know that ever-growing acronym purporting to describe non-straight people? LGBTQ was once GLBTQ. For some reason the lesbians demanded they come first. Possibly due to "historical oppression." On the other hand, it might have been mere narcissism: many hardcore religious fundamentalist societies don't e…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:33 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVwKjGbz60k
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:26 PM
1

Steinem I guess that's an example of a "conspiracy fact." I was under the impression that CIA was prohibited from engaging in domestic counter-intelligence operations (that's the FBI's job! ;). Wasn't their funding of Ms. Magazine technically illegal? Also, the Ford Foundation has a long and extremely well documented history of collaboration with the CIA, which in turn was founded not only by military officials but a bunch of Wall Street bankers and lawyers. Westerners and Americans in particula…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:02 PM
1

Hehe fair enough. Well the TLDR is yes, I agree with you. I guess these are the most relevant passages: Were women played as suckers by the capitalist class? Were leftists also played as suckers by the capitalist class? I think the answer is clearly yes. To those who say, "that sounds like a conspiracy theory," a few words: (A) conspiracies by elites are actually exceedingly common -- just look at the declassified history of the CIA and (B) The term "conspiracy theory" is wildly overused. Elite …
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:38 PM
1

I don't support traditionalism. However I don't have any problem with certain "traditional gender roles" eg women spending more time raising children instead of sending them to state daycare. I think both men and women would be happier that way. My main point re: traditionalism is that feminism has not made women happier or healthier, and that women arguably had a much better deal under traditionalism than men did.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:29 PM
3

“Chivalry, as understood by Modern Sentimental Feminism, means unlimited licence for women in their relations with men, and unlimited coercion for men in their relations with women. To men all duties and no rights, to women all rights and no duties, is the basic principle underlying Modern Feminism, Suffragism, and the bastard chivalry it is so fond of invoking. The most insistent female shrieker for equality between the sexes among Political Feminists, it is interesting to observe, will, in mos…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:55 PM
4

TLDW? I don't have the stomach to sit through this. Though I would happily do so if /u/girlwriteswhat took it apart. Preferably while eating a ham sandwich.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:06 PM
11

Two more contenders from the same time period: Stanislav Petrov and Vasili Arkhipov. They had the courage to disobey orders when the fate of the entire human race was resting on their shoulders. Sometimes the greatest strength comes from choosing not to fight.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:58 PM
10

No, thats definitely a stretch. Yeah, murder would have been quick. She tried to have a man defamed, assaulted and forcibly confined/tortured for potentially decades.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:47 PM
12

"[Feminism] means unlimited license for women in their relations with men, and unlimited coercion for men in their relations with women. To men all duties and no rights, to women all rights and no duties" - Earnest Belfort Bax, 1913
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:45 PM
4

That's mostly what people are doing imo. If women are going to demand sexual straitjackets for men then women should abide by the same standards.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:24 PM
3

And herein lies the fundamental problem with feminist "logic" as it pertains to sexual harassment and assault: if a person feels a behavior is wrong, it is wrong; the objective behavior is entirely irrelevant. The same applies in reverse. Thus, if Brad Pitt slaps a woman on her ass, it's not harassment; but if some old guy from PBS touches a woman on her back, that is brutal sexual assault and he should be fired and socially ostracized (he was). When you combine a "feelings-based" social ethos w…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 04:16 PM
2

How do I deal with my anger towards Jews?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:15 PM
22

Agreed. Feminist theory is based on the bizarre idea that men try to oppress women "as a class" (as Warren Farrell noted, women are the only 'oppressed' group in history that own more luxury items than their 'oppressors'). In this light, all interactions between men and women should be viewed through the lens of "oppression" -- especially sex (aka rape). Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "sleeping with the enemy." I applaud this feminist for being consistent in her worldview. If one actual…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter