~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Non-Discriminatory Issues: Sexual Literacy and Relationship Health: The Male OrgasmAwareness of possibility isn't enough. People need to be conscious of all possible lies and misinformations from media and academia, to take responsibility for their own potential rather than waiting for scientists to do the dirty job and allowing a practice. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/24 06:53 PM |
| 1 | Men, you must never hesitate to show your sensitive side. Tough masculinity is toxic.My life revolves around me Why are you in a support group, then? You're more of the same milquestoast normie brainwashed by post-modern anticommunist propaganda. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 02:24 PM |
| 1 | Men, you must never hesitate to show your sensitive side. Tough masculinity is toxic.What's the point of understanding the system and kowtowing to it anyways? For all the supposed stoicism the manosphere, namely MGTOWs, displays, they're hellbent on being reactionaries rather than revolutionaries. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 12:31 PM |
| 21 | Women would throw a fit if a man explained female sexuality to them, yet in universities every day female professors claim to understand and explain male sexuality to students.Men's sexuality is limited to the penis and ejaculation performance most of the time, and your average woman is okay with that even though the consequences also hurt them. Just let that sink in, how much lack of empathy impairs judgement. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/24 10:16 PM |
| 131 | Not wanting to eat other person's vagina is some how an offense now?And receive nothing in return. Even going as far as being demanded to mutillate your dick for their aesthetic whims. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/24 11:49 AM |
| 7 | Why is misandry actually seen as less harmful?AND it also offers a scapegoat alternative to capitalism as a root cause for that "social behavior" demands. So long as the men on top are getting away with it, the bottom ones may as well die. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/24 04:12 PM |
| 9 | Medically unnecessary circumcision is abuse, but when does it become trauma?I don't even like to think about the mental toil circumcised men have to undergo. Not only they have to accept the inevitability of their trauma, but also society gaslighting them into thinking it's not a big deal of an issue compared to, say, manspreading. It's pure evil, and as selfish as this may sound, I don't wanna touch the subject to borrow a pain that isn't mine. I will definitely support any intactivist movements, though. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/24 11:44 AM |
| 8 | I was puzzled by younger women’s reaction to Barbie. It turned out Gen Z men held the answerThe author is missing on purpose that the real cause is capitalism. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 02:30 PM |
| 7 | Why is it normalized to disparage the genitals of genital mutilation victims?Good lord. Circumcision and FGM are not remotely comparable, especially in terms of risk, motivation, method, nor medical basis "medical basis" = "I believe in media rather than exert empathy towards one's lack of autonomy". The desperation to keep FGM as a much worse practice is mental gymnastics to keep your self-image intact. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/24 05:14 AM |
| 1 | Could you discuss what loneliness means to you in your own words? Can you describe a few of your own experiences and feelings with loneliness?It's like Diogenes walking around people while holding an oil lamp on broad daylight in search for human beings. He was a homeless dirty hobo who still had principles and thought those around him were the animals. But no pride and certainty on his beliefs could change the fact he was alone and not understood. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/24 08:06 AM |
| 44 | Was Foreskin Evolution’s Great Mistake? — Queer MajorityExtremely disgusting. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/24 07:21 PM |
| 2 | Psychological Mechanics of Guilting and Shaming MenTwo points. We can only imagine what the world would look like if men were not operating under pressure of guilt; it would probably look more like a series of relaxed traditional villages instead of the outlandish marvels of civilization we see today. Wrong. Guilt is the perception of suboptimal conditions, necessary for progress and creation. Peer pressure and hurt-comfort is what you're looking for here: in their absence, buildings could be conceived out of an overpopulation crisis, for exampl… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/24 09:48 AM |
| 1 | Capitalism stretches to all markets... except for men's sexuality.You are an idiot. I've seen your comments and they pretty much amount to everything in favor to what people accuses MRA of being: atavistic and conservative. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/24 07:22 AM |
| 1 | Capitalism stretches to all markets... except for men's sexuality.It is indeed natural. Guys love tits, ass, pretty face Just like women like men's bodies too, but sex toys aren't exclusive to such preferences. You're completely unaware of propaganda. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/24 11:19 PM |
| 1 | Capitalism stretches to all markets... except for men's sexuality.You refuse to think WHY guys prefer that, assuming it's a natural predispsition rather than an ingrained insecurity, reinforced over decades. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/24 10:34 PM |
| 1 | Capitalism stretches to all markets... except for men's sexuality.>For men who prefer taking rather than giving That is the issue. Porn is the staple for men because it dehumanizes them as sex-hungry brutes who objetify and dominate women, everything else is either BDSM (niche) or for those who "prefer taking rather than giving" as if both were exclusive and not part of a men's sexuality to be explored in tandem. Most guys think their rejection of butt play is "just how they are" rather than what it truly is: insecurity in being perceived as gay or feminine an… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/24 10:11 PM |
| 2 | Capitalism stretches to all markets... except for men's sexuality.Already replied to it. Porn is dehumanizing to both parts. As a sextoy, it's meant to give masculinity an animalistic source. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/24 10:06 PM |
| 0 | Capitalism stretches to all markets... except for men's sexuality.And you assume that distinction isn't important. Porn and fleshlights is industry telling guys they're hungry dogs after a piece of meat, but women have products tailored for their needs. Only they are allowed to be humanized. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/24 06:30 PM |
| -1 | “Orange Peel Theory” Is TikTok’s Latest Misandry Trend - XYTo be fair, the boyfriend from that article's cover video was a douche. You shouldn't halt yourself from doing good things out of pride, or to smear double standards on her face. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/24 02:46 PM |
| 0 | Democracy will collapse if men stop supporting itI think you are just way to propagandized and ignorant to listen to you're own words that come out of you're mouth. You are making FUNDEMENTAL mistakes and misunderstandings. MANY Says the native english speaker incapable of distinguishing 'your' and 'you're'. That alone doesn't disprove your points, but affects their believability. All those paragraphs can be debunked from a contradiction you've said: capitalism is competition, but also free markets. Freedom and competition are antagonic concep… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/24 06:31 AM |
| 0 | Democracy will collapse if men stop supporting itCapitalism and free market are the same exact thing Maybe in the late 1700s, in which that outcome was idealized during the birth of capitalism. History points that it always, by its own tenets, degenerates into competition like you stated. Free markets can't exist in a system where more money also implies political influence over someone else's property, and with capital hoarding that intervention will eventually be necessary. It's more of the same demoralizing to avoid the recognition of capit… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/24 05:13 AM |
| 0 | Democracy will collapse if men stop supporting itEverything you are complaining about is the result of the LACK OF capitalism in the US The excuse is not enough capitalism, just as it was in the past. Understanding economics means to be aware it's a scam to favor capital hoarding, so of course they're instilling the notion that all failure from such system is due to not having more of it. True free markets can't exist in capitalism, and can't be synonyms with, for if the system requires that resources be exclusive in order to increase their va… | /r/MensRights | 19/01/24 04:19 AM |
| 0 | Democracy will collapse if men stop supporting it>Inequality exists naturally. Free Market Capitalism is the most democratic kind of economy to exist. Oh yes, it's another brainwashed person, probably from the US, who thinks anything in human civilization akin to predatorism is natural to humans since our species came from nature. It's not like even within biology there's protocooperation among unthinking species, right? So by stating humans should define their limits based off biology is admitting to your own lack of humanity, not least becau… | /r/MensRights | 17/01/24 03:43 AM |
| 6 | Democracy will collapse if men stop supporting itThere is no 'democracy' in this world. We live in a global system moved by capital hoarding, there needs to be inequality for capitalism to exist. Democracy, as Biden overtly stated, is when a country has the same interests as the US. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/24 05:58 PM |
| 4 | Women making fun of men who ask for reciprocation in a relationship by calling it princess treatment.we are pretty simple creatures Speak for yourself. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/24 04:31 AM |
| 1 | Responses of people from r/sex, to a post about a man cumming too quicklyBiologically they are inseperable Not according to several reports on men who make the distinction between the 'point of no return' and the feeling of an orgasm and can separate the two. You're basing yourself in academic research when the ivory tower is part of the system that favors women in science advancements while handicapping men. Mens orgasms point is to ejaculate. There is no other purpose. If you're an animal, sure. Human beings are not defined by biology, but its overcoming. That's wh… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/24 03:11 PM |
| 1 | Responses of people from r/sex, to a post about a man cumming too quicklybut even then, that is not comparable to a female orgasm I see, as suspected: you are the masochist type of guy who doesn't know about the prostate nor wants to. The type who wants "just the dry penile orgasms" as if it's a self-service you can choose. Nope, dry penile orgasms are about recognizing what the prostate does, in a way, even when they're not connected. Remember what I said it's about changing how you feel things? All those full body orgasms you can just let go are experienced by bott… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/24 01:33 PM |
| 2 | Responses of people from r/sex, to a post about a man cumming too quicklyI could do it with the squeeze kegels, but that's Chia's wrong interpretation of how taoists did, and takes a lot of work, aside from being harmful. You have to relax the kegel muscles instead of contracting them even when you're close to cumming. It involves seeking a new way of feeling things, though, because you'll want to give in and cum the old way, your body will contract those muscles and short your breath to make those things happen. And men do all that mostly out of masturbation trauma,… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/24 01:20 PM |
| 3 | Responses of people from r/sex, to a post about a man cumming too quicklysure, but 99% of men cannot separate the two Because they weren't taught how to. r/multiorgasmic has no New Age bullshit, and I'm doing lots of progress with multiple dry orgasms. Again, you should be wondering WHY are people so cruelly comfortable with men having limitations to their sexuality, but when women can't orgasm, it's a problem that men should immediately solve. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/24 01:09 PM |
| 4 | Responses of people from r/sex, to a post about a man cumming too quicklyThat orgasms in a men are connected to ejaculation. Do you ever wonder why media vouches for bottom surgeries on trans people, a very complex medical procedure, but "can't" make ejaculation optional (they can already with sperm blockers and kegels)? There are interests in making men's sexuality limited on purpose, and the worst part is that people conform to this as if it was ok that men should feel performative and worried about not cumming. Just go to PussyEnvy, there are masochist men and sad… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/24 01:04 PM |
| 1 | Responses of people from r/sex, to a post about a man cumming too quicklyTo every guy with misconceptions about their orgasms: I research the subject, and you can find lots of information on my profile. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/24 12:40 PM |
| 3 | Responses of people from r/sex, to a post about a man cumming too quicklyI don't even bother checking the sub, it's gonna make me feel physically sick. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/24 12:39 PM |
| 3 | The New Meta: Men’s Game Plan for SocietyHe means 'goal' and is probably an ESL | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 09:09 PM |
| 34 | Study shows that women (even bisexual women) are extremely biphobic towards bisexual menin large part because of risk of STDs So, unjustified prejudice. They consider only men carry sexual diseases. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/23 08:36 PM |
| 470 | I am a mother to be in three weeks to a baby boy, and I'm wondering, what is your take on circumcision as a circumcised/uncircumcised man?Also beware for scamming. Doctors lie and pressure patients into doing it. Be resistant for your son's integrity. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/23 08:11 AM |
| 1 | Why is masculinity so dependent on women.but how do bisexuals for both masculine and feminine work in your theory? I like femininity on women and masculinity on men, and act the opppsite accordingly. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/23 09:18 PM |
| -1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesCapitalism is a mode of production that's very overarching, not just an economic process. Indeed, every part of your existence can be marketed, and the only thing preventing this from going crazy are feeble laws which aren't even made to save your ass primarily, but capitalists'. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 07:16 PM |
| -1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesI think that you need to understand the moral origins of property Let me guess, it comes from the self-existent argumentative ethics of Hans-Hermann Hoppe? It begins with self-ownership, I own my body. I don't have to explain why, as I consider it self-evident. To interface with the world, I need to exert my influence on other entities and objects. It literally cannot be avoided, because It is what It means to exist. ...it seems I was correct. You don't own your body, you are it. Ownership as a … | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 06:17 PM |
| 0 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesCommunism is a political and economic ideology where all property is collectively owned That's a very shallow understanding of it, which stems from trying to fit private property logic into the concept of wealth. Wealth is the collectve product of our civilization, from tools, through systems, to institutions. Making wealth accessible for everyone means that people may use such resources to satisfy their needs, solve problems, and progress human species. That requires a conscience that whatever … | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 04:11 PM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesSure, if you only put the value and wealth of everything we did on a classification tool which is only a fraction of that. The very need for a concept such as 'mammals' to exist came to be from human criation. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 02:26 PM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesCould it be that some broader aspects of human society work to disadvantage men no matter the economic model More of the same 'but economy is different from social because one is numbers and the other is people'. Modes of production organize how humans use nature's resources to meet their demands, meaning an illogical economic system causes social problems. What differs among different modes so far were the overarching reasons behind those problems. Capitalism tags men as providers, then as mons… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 12:28 PM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesThere's no such thing as a cake recipe for socialism, what there is are principles of what something should have in order to be considered socialist. In fact, communists reinforce more the need to be anti-capitalist than a ready-structure to apply in every single country because each socialist experience carries its own cultural burden to solve, and need to deal with capitalist remnants depending on how they position in the geopolitical scenario. For example, China's 'contextual capitalism' come… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 12:08 PM |
| 0 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesYou would not want to live in China See, it's incredible the levels of arrogance and, at the same time, humblebragging you have to put up to keep your worldview going on, projecting ignorance over a foreign government as if it was everyone else's desires. And how is the USSR working out these days? To think the fall of Soviet Union had to do with the failure of socialism is to deny the international quality of capitalism. Hence why americans insist on the word 'collapse' to define the end of rea… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 11:56 AM |
| -1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesNot sure how old you are. But honestly, once you've accumulated a bit of wealth, and status in society you realise it's pretty good being a man in a capitalist world Yes, because men's gender role of a provider can be accomplished when you can provide. Quelle surprise. But that's defending an inefficient system with blatant logical flaws whose altermatives can be given at any time (such as Peter Koprotkin's proof that we could feed everyone in the world for the next century) only because it bene… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 10:22 AM |
| -2 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesShow me a better system that can deliver on with such a diverse and large scale that the USA has Literally China skyrocketing life expectancy during 1949-1970 from 35 years old to 72. It was the poorest country in the world before going socialist. That or the USSR going from wooden plow agriculture to spaceship building in thirty years. The US is capitalist propaganda itself. To not even muse the possibility they would lie to citizens about communism for their own benefit is a sign you're immure… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 10:12 AM |
| -1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesCommunism often involves a centralized authority that controls and distributes resources Proof that americans don't study. Communism has not state, therefore no authority; socialism does. And if you think true free markets capitalism is a thing rather the authoritarian imperialism it's always been, that's more proof of what I'm saying. There's always power over people while there's state: the only question is who's that power benefitting. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 10:10 AM |
| 3 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesThe only requirement to be an MRA is to advocate for men's rights Because contradictions and cognitive dissonance don't exist, of course. Even TERFs can claim to value Men's Rights if they're delusional enough. Whether gender roles are good idea for human society is another matter, but it is wrong to say capitalism created gender roles I didn't say it created gender roles as if humans only ever had one set of them. I said capitalism created its own set of gender roles to further its purpose, but… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 10:06 AM |
| 0 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesIf you want to change the system you have to do it by taking biological facts into account Biology is ground, and that's all it should be accounted for. Its only use is to make the sky visible and preferable. Humans have only evolved as a civilization breaking through biological limitations, not embracing them. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 10:03 AM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesIt's indesputable that huge leaps in technological advancement have taken place as a result of free enterprise and capitalism That doesn't mean it couldn't have been done better nor that we should keep it with all its flaws instead of overcoming it. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 10:01 AM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesSo when "the great revolution" happens I can stay out of it or will you try to force me to do what you demand? The problem with you pro-capitalists is that you seem to think politics is like a game in which every country is independent, chooses its flag, and never interferes with each other. You can stay out of a socialist country, they won't force you in. But because revolution implies systematic changes, eventually it'll become of international interest the more nations are favorable to it. No… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 09:58 AM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesI didn't say that. Because we live in capitalism right now, that mode of production causes men's issues that we're facing now. This sounds like you trying to justify inacton towards the system. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 09:54 AM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesAnd this is how you know you're dealing with an extremist because nothing makes them angrier than someone who isnt on their tribe You say that while rejecting tribes that aren't in the central tribe you partake. It's your hypocrisy, cowardice and arrogance that are enraging, I couldn't care less for such types not being communists since truth will eventually show up until it becomes the norm, and you'll change stance to fit in like the good cattle you are. I'm merely hastening the inevitable pro… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 01:40 AM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesYou're literally the case I've mentioned in OP text, a guy who puts progressives and radical communists in the same 'leftist' boat. And to what end? Staying in the center among other cows, too afraid to step out of the herd. You may as well be dead as an illuminated centrist who thinks he's beyond ideology from 'both sides', what impact on reality do you intend to achieve that way except being cattle mass? You know who wears horseshoe theories? Horses, those animals that wear blinders which make… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 01:27 AM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesI don't care for ideologues trying to use men to further thier own political agenda You mean you don't care for capitalists responsible for men's issues? Because capitalism is supported by ideology. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 12:13 AM |
| 2 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesThe only people content with centers as opposed to extremes are conformists. Supporting Men's Rights through the very system taking them away is contradictory and armchair activism. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 11:28 PM |
| 2 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender roleswho've seen the alternatives, sometimes firsthand 'existing in the same time period' is not the same as firsthand experience, nor is socialism one cake recipe that all socialist countries follow. Each experience carries its flaws from the time it was still capitalist, as well as the consequences of going against the system. The reason anti-capitalism is better than capitalism is that standing against a logically contradictory system is logical. Even if you don't accept socialism as the new perio… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 11:14 PM |
| 1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender roleshave to think that modern civilization just "happens". Nice strawman, packed with using the 'pseudo' prefix to discredit everyone whose thought process you don't or don't want to understand. Because if you say it's all pseudo hard enough, then it becomes true. Imagine being so ignorant of history to think that it's not History's not a straight line, there were moments of war and temporary peace back and forth. You've also failed to address why that's relevant or justifies reactionary beliefs: th… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 10:26 PM |
| -1 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesIt's not that it prevents you, but may make you hold contradictory or counterproductive views to that agenda. Progressive tax or flat tax just means you're okay with giving money to capitalists who further their wants that usually lead to financed anti-men progressive propaganda, as I've mentioned. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 10:21 PM |
| -2 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesImagine being so psychotic to think the current world's zeitgeist is anywhere near 'peaceful'. I'm truthfully creeped out by the levels of narcissism US has its citizens on to defend their economic system. It's also unclear why modern times being better mean they can't be objectively bad as well. -50 is lower than -30, but both are negative. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 10:12 PM |
| -6 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesHowever, it's important to note that one's stance on government regulations or tax rates may not directly correlate with their views on men's rights This mentality is very positivist and doesn't hold true to reality. All information in a system is connected one way one another, so much that interfering with part of it means the rest gets corrupted. Taxes are yet another component for capitalism, meaning your stances on it can work in favor or against Men's Rights indirectly. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 10:08 PM |
| -6 | Even Men's Rights Activists fall for self-destructive reactionarism because at least it provides a sense of identity through traditional gender rolesbecause social issues are inherently tied to economy in capitalism. Those with money have political power to enforce their values on others, therefore your positions on money management can explain who you think should have that power. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 09:55 PM |
| 2 | Conservatives at it again saying men are disposable. An exampleWe are not and should not limit ourselves to biology. That's the same as degrading human civilization to that of animalistic desires, but clearly human nature supersedes nature since we can shape it to our needs. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 08:53 PM |
| 6 | Conservatives at it again saying men are disposable. An exampleMale disposablity is fine For animals who think humanity is about fettering yourself to biology rather than overcoming it. I mean, seriously, humans went from nomad savages to a civilization that can stand thousands of years despite its tragic birth and unfoldings, yet you believe male disposibility is the best we can come up with to solve problems? You are not a Mens Rights supporter if you have that little self-respect. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 08:51 PM |
| -5 | Men and even women are uncomfortable critiquing womenAn extremely primitive and gynocentric mindset. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 03:07 PM |
| -3 | Men and even women are uncomfortable critiquing womenCompetition is only a driver for creativity in capitalism, though. Only capitalists assume resources are scarce enough that they need competition, when in reality it's all inflated. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 02:45 PM |
| -20 | Men and even women are uncomfortable critiquing womenMen must compete with other men for status Enforced by capitalist logic, and yes it did damage even back then. Men competing among themselves is not healthy. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 09:35 AM |
| 5 | The west and uncircumcision propaganda.With a foreskin you can masturbate without lube. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/23 08:03 AM |
| 1 | Gents, are your orgasms Feminist enough.Best part is when you let go, I don't understand men who don't moan in sex. Masturbation sure, but otherwise? | /r/MensRights | 18/09/23 08:45 AM |
| 2 | ‘Men Are 100% Responsible for Unwanted Pregnancies’: 'Ejaculate Responsibly' fellas.They say that even though no one is interested in investing on sperm blockers or male contraception because new bastards need to be born for the exploiting machine to work. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/23 12:36 PM |
| 3 | No body positivity for menThat's how traumatized they got. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/23 09:23 AM |
| 2 | Why are men expected to be tall?Because there is an agenda to keep men dehumanized, as humanization includes receptivity, and men fit the role of providers in the capitalist system. Meaning, to diminish a man's issues is a tactic enforced by capitalist propaganda to keep the wheels running. It's geared at women as well, but with a different focus. Just because sex is a lower level issue, doesn't mean it's not emergent. In fact, it's because men are dehumanized even on sexuality and nobody cares that such agenda is so effective… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/23 03:38 AM |
| 4 | Why are men expected to be tall?All of that is untrue. Most research favoring women's orgasm is done so because media prompts their execution more than with guys. Not to mention most male subjects on the ones focused on them are circumcised, as researchers don't think a male's body autonomy interferes with their sexual satisfaction... something which you agree with, since in another thread you supported snipping your kid because of a personal preference Prostate orgasms are multiple, can continue indefinitely, and brain activi… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/23 02:01 PM |
| 4 | Why are men expected to be tall?add the fact that, the gift you give and are shamed for gives you 4X the sexual pleasure as a male orgasm. You obviously got this from anywhere but your ass. I assume you don't know the prostate is a thing also. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/23 12:51 PM |
| 1 | A theory of everything (at least of post-modernism)Sexuality has nothing to do with gender roles. But of course it's the average brainwashed cuckmerican speaking, someone who walks daily on a soil built off waging war on other countries in the name of "democracy". It takes a deeply psychotic and/or uneducated mind to believe this isn't the source of the civilization's problems. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/23 11:53 AM |
| 3 | Male orgasms are on the decline. That shouldn’t become a woman’s problemHow much you wanna bet she says 'ew' at prostate stimulation or men who enjoy it? | /r/MensRights | 07/08/23 06:39 AM |
| 1 | A theory of everything (at least of post-modernism)And? It's not like statistics are meaningless cutoffs from reality used by the elites to goad the masses. More so when consummerism isn't related to the material only; mainstream media and opinions stemmed from it are also included. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/23 07:28 PM |
| -1 | A theory of everything (at least of post-modernism)What you're looking for is capitalism and its inherently autophagic structure. Gender roles are a cornerstone of the capital because you need inheritance to keep hoarding money throughout time. which would never be a thing if heteronormative roles weren't the norm, to pass land and resources to the next generation. That literally explains everything: those gender roles in their most fundamental tenets are kept intact in capitalism lest it crumbles; men are the providers who compete among themsel… | /r/MensRights | 06/08/23 11:55 AM |
| -1 | Why is society surprised or being doomers about AI girlfriends but refuse to help men?You assume having self-control is somehow magnanimous and patronizing. Truly, that says more about you than myself. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/23 08:28 PM |
| -4 | Why is society surprised or being doomers about AI girlfriends but refuse to help men?Lies. You're justifying your drive for sex based off a generalization. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/23 06:44 PM |
| -10 | Why is society surprised or being doomers about AI girlfriends but refuse to help men?It's okay to define yourself as an animal incapable of cognition. It's not okay to project your mental inferiority on others. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/23 06:43 PM |
| -15 | Why is society surprised or being doomers about AI girlfriends but refuse to help men?men as driven by sex That's the problematic premise, though. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/23 01:08 PM |
| -29 | Why is society surprised or being doomers about AI girlfriends but refuse to help men?That point of view dehumanizes men, for it supposes they should have no standards for sex besides the body or bare functionality. It enforces the stereotypical image of men as inherently simple creatures in every aspect. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/23 12:57 PM |
| 10 | So where exactly are those male privileges I have been promised?Liberals defend those double-standards because they're hypocrites: they peddle it as apparently against gender roles, but the implication is that men should endure abuse as a proof of their manhood, because if he's a real man then "just" the fact a woman said 'kill all men' shouldn't make him express human emotions, not after all the atrocities his antecessors did to women. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/23 06:15 AM |
| 2 | High school boys are trending conservative. “Among liberals, the future is female,” she wrote. “And among conservatives, the future is male.”You've used 'ain't' unironically in a sentence, that denies you any authority to judge others on their English. And you think socialism means taxes and parasitism, which's exactly what the capitalist elites do and accuse the socs of doing. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/23 06:08 AM |
| 24 | This is what happens when a man opens up about his traumashe could no longer see him as masculine And it's the reason why straight women are comfortable with kissing each other and discard it nonchalantly as 'friend stuff', but (mostly bisexual) men need to do it under the covers to not spoil their chances with women, and are shamed when 'revealed'. It's mostly women's sexual selection that represses male sexuality, but they're more ideologically inclined to do this than biologically. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/23 04:46 PM |
| 1 | A Feminist proposes a "final solution" to the Incel Questionu/profanitycounter | /r/MensRights | 21/07/23 05:55 PM |
| 2 | A Feminist proposes a "final solution" to the Incel Questionhi! | /r/MensRights | 21/07/23 05:55 PM |
| 1 | I divorced my dying husband — he wallowed in self-pity and killed my vibecheck her user history and you'll get it | /r/MensRights | 21/06/23 10:39 PM |
| 0 | I divorced my dying husband — he wallowed in self-pity and killed my vibeWTF. You are literally pure evil, there's definitely an agenda going on here. Skirting around on r/MensRights just enough to not be deleted or rise suspicion, but on other subs you overtly spread misinformation demoralizing men because "we're wired that way". As if humanity's nature wasn't beyond biology BY DEFINITION, since self-consciousness is a human-only trait which allows for people to interact with the world based on their internal values. If anyone believes biology supersedes that decisi… | /r/MensRights | 21/06/23 07:43 PM |
| 8 | Those who say MtFs "will never be a woman" explicit women's privilegeYou missed the point. MtF are specifically told they will never be women as if the state of being one was a scarce privilege which men are taking away from them. It's society telling men to stay in their place as the unprivileged sex even if they can be tolerated by some progressists if he agrees to transition. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/23 08:46 PM |
| 16 | Women undeniably have more rights than men in America'barely affects him' how? Women love to cry out how their orgasmless sex is dreadful, demanding men to go down on them. But a man who, mind you, already has social stigma hindering his full potential through the prostate, claiming his own sexual integrity is trivial? You also assume there's not enough room to work on all those issues at the same time. It's a false, instilled notion that the governments' resources are too scarce for them to focus on problems. Meant to favor certain groups, of cou… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/23 08:48 AM |
| 16 | Women undeniably have more rights than men in AmericaFirst off, women are protected from having parts of their genitals amputated, and men are not. I can show you peer reviewed, proven studies (Sorrels et al 2007) that the foreskin is responsible for the majority of male sexual sensitivity. This is the largest discrimination between the sexes by far, and anyone who disagrees is wrong and immoral. There is no female issue that comes close to mutilating boys genitals for no reason at all Not to forget they psychotically deny and retreat when confron… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/23 08:42 AM |
| 3 | I submit that nowadays women can be either masculine or feminine, while men can't be either.You're also right that any healthy person should be capable of both masculinity and femininity, and those who can't or think their biology defines their thought processes are bastards. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/23 03:36 AM |
| 1 | Sexual satisfaction and bonding is more sex democratic than many people think. Proof: gay men produce oxytocin compared to het womenPrimary roles haven't really changed over the millennia Similarly, we've never got any meaningful representations at all until the invention of TV made that possible. Defining human beings as biology in its end is a presentist mindset of those who need its tenets as defining traits for their personality, that is, animals in human skin. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/23 09:43 AM |
| 8 | Sexual satisfaction and bonding is more sex democratic than many people think. Proof: gay men produce oxytocin compared to het womenDuring most sexual encounters the man isn’t orgasming at all This is pristine shard of insight. Of course! Because gender roles stem from biology and the perpetuation of species, people assume ejaculation equals to orgasm as that's where a man's role ends. But then humanity is defined by surpassing those limitations, which, in a gynocentric society, translates in efforts towards women instead. The narrative that women usually don't have an orgasm is true insofar as this one also is. Orgasm is a … | /r/MensRights | 12/06/23 08:27 AM |
| 2 | Do Feminists Suffer From Penis Envy?Yes. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/23 11:09 AM |
| 0 | Do Feminists Suffer From Penis Envy?Yeh I'm not following your link to a porn site. Porn is not a real representation of sex in the wild. "Yeah I'll remain ignorant and spread misinformation while admonishing those things in other comments because I'm too lazy to care researching about issues beyond my sight" This is repulsive. For anyone interested in anecdotal evidence about prostate orgasms and their intensity, check out Aneros' forums. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/23 09:35 AM |
| 1 | Do Feminists Suffer From Penis Envy?Men cannot orgasm like a woman, it just isn't possible, regardless of prostate stimulation. You don't know enough about prostate stimulation or male orgasms in general, then. First of all, orgasm and ejaculation are separate phenomena and can be dissociated, resulting in multiple penile orgasms. This is what prostate multiple orgasms look like. The myth women have it better in sex is due to insecurity and ignorance. As if stimulating your own anatomy made you less masculine. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/23 07:55 AM |
| 2 | Do Feminists Suffer From Penis Envy?But women have way more neuron endings on the clitoris and they get more intense orgasmas Not true. That was based off a research using cow clitorises. Plus, the prostate is conspicuously ignored and men are seen as the ones who need to provide and hold off their pleasure, never to receive. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/23 06:22 AM |
| -1 | Do Feminists Suffer From Penis Envy?Because the prostate is conspicuously ignored and men are seen as the ones who need to provide and hold off their pleasure, never to receive. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/23 06:20 AM |
| 1 | Do Feminists Suffer From Penis Envy?And for the record. It doesn't sound like this is the case at all. Women are moaning and screaming where the guy at most is heavy breathing... Because the prostate is conspicuously ignored and men are seen as the ones who need to provide and hold off their pleasure. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/23 06:19 AM |
| 1 | Masculinity is being forcefully killed in young menMy only concern with enforcing 'masculinity' is to associate objectively toxic gender roles to 'natural' man behavior. For example, do you think being receptive in sex is 'unmasculine'? That male disposability is masculine and a natural consequence of our nature? | /r/MensRights | 17/03/23 08:54 AM |
| 11 | Countries safe for men?Very, but in the poor areas, which is designed. First world people from even lower middle class can save some money to buy a condominium lot in high class towns inside the big cities known as 'Alphaville' and other brand names, which are surrounded by walls and monitored all the time. The sad part is that you're gonna see inequality right outside your door, and live a parasitic life that sucks resources from the outer city workers to support themselves without ever contributing to it. But at lea… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/23 04:13 PM |
| 13 | Countries safe for men?I live in Brazil, want desperately to go out, but I must admit at least circumcision is a non-issue here. People are actually indifferent or disgusted by the idea. Draft is also not a problem. If you're rich and/or live in the US, move to a high-class city in Brazil and save yourself. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/23 02:35 PM |
| 5 | UK: Woman, 41, is jailed after forcing a man to have sex with her while he was asleep - as judge says there is 'no distinction between this and raping a woman'This gives an animalistic conotation to men: if rape is only physical boundary transigence, not verbal, then only men can rape given their 'nature', and can't be raped because their intelligence to verbally deny contact doesn't matter. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/23 08:46 PM |
| 14 | I hate that there is little to no body-positivity for menAnd baldness, a problem that for sure could've been solved a long time ago without selling out miraculous products. The interesting phenomena I'm noticing is that women say men have body positivity because they're 'encouraged' to go shirtless and show abs, muscles. Which in itself enforces the opposite idea, as that ignores men who don't have said physique. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/23 08:35 PM |
| 2 | These two books, written by a woman but in favor of the male cause, deserve more publicity!Most housewives don't think of their husband as a plow horse Untrue. Those women have experienced disgust or exhasperation at best when confronted with a situation where they don't get to ride and need to invest emotional care, like it's a chore. They'll avoid those endeavors as much as possible using the status quo as a safe space, including their husband's autophagic treatment towards themselves as self-sacrificing. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/23 05:31 AM |
| 1 | These two books, written by a woman but in favor of the male cause, deserve more publicity!The book argues that throughout history, men have been conditioned to prioritize women's happiness and well-being over their own, and that this has been reinforced by societal structures and gender roles. This dynamic has often led to men being expected to provide for women financially, physically, and emotionally, I knew it. Even receptive sex is frowned upon when men are having them. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/23 05:25 AM |
| 0 | These two books, written by a woman but in favor of the male cause, deserve more publicity!Do you have any researches about male sexual anatomy and orgasms? Preferably headed by women, of course. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/23 05:22 AM |
| 0 | Body shaming people with small penises is not ok, no matter who the villain isGood point, but we must consider this mentality stems from heteronormative views held by both sexes, in which there must be a weaker, submissive force in need of care and humanity, but who's also infantilized. Between two gay men, one of them must be seen as the sub, and therefore as the "woman", so other women will either assimilate him into the group as you've said, or gang up with other men to drag him down under the premise he's "playing the easy role", not doing the gritting like real men d… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/22 02:54 PM |
| -3 | Women Transitions Into A Man And Doesn't Like Being A ManSure rich white men are at the top. But white men are also at the bottom of society too Not from a universal perspective. Ethnic people are at the real bottom, and it's precisely white culture that makes it seem only local white people problems count when depicting the lowest of our civilization, as if third world countries weren't inhabited by humans to begin with. Sure, if we pick a white country such as Canada and see its working class, of course they'll be mostly white because POOR people ar… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/22 07:16 AM |
| -19 | Women Transitions Into A Man And Doesn't Like Being A ManWhy? It's understandable that, since majorly white people protagonize Western culture, it can be called white culture. I'm against demonizing average white people of today for damage caused by said culture, but that nomenclature is calling a spade a spade. If media uses "White Imperialism" as an excuse to demonize white people, they are the sophists. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/22 10:28 PM |
| -58 | Women Transitions Into A Man And Doesn't Like Being A Mannon whites around the world pulling the strings. Nouveau riche, yes. And still, just because white descendants have been dying, doesn't mean their influence doesn't linger. 'White' became less about race and more about cultural opposition to anything that isn't Western. It's not a perfect attribution, but an understandable one. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/22 06:51 PM |
| -20 | Women Transitions Into A Man And Doesn't Like Being A ManRich white men at the top percentile pushing hatred against lower class man in favor of women to generate pink money and exclusivity of resources for themselves, which means society is both patriarchal and gynocentric. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/22 04:04 PM |
| 4 | Why is it considered men’s fault when their spouse cheats on them?Looking at relationships as revolving around your libido devoids them of all value. It also objectifies men as fuck machines. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/22 03:43 AM |
| 1 | Inspired by this other post, I made an AI write a short essay on how male orgasms are unexplored compared to womenYes, but since the prostate is psychotically denied as a source of pleasure for men, this goes undocumented. You have to understand female worship as a fetish is structural rather than spontaneous, and it's largely due to lack of research that men's sexuality is underwhelmed to value women's. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/22 12:30 PM |
| 3 | I feel like we could all use a break. Lets have a fun relaxing post. Fellas, whats something you enjoy doing that isnt typically considered masculine?Gay sex, prostate massage/pegging/being on the receptive side with women, customizing clothes so I have an unearthly style, feet and skin care. Unfortunately, I can't afford any of those lately. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/22 05:32 AM |
| 1 | Inspired by this other post, I made an AI write a short essay on how male orgasms are unexplored compared to womenI recognize only one mistake in my post and it was the use of "niche" to undermine its importance. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/22 06:07 AM |
| 1 | Inspired by this other post, I made an AI write a short essay on how male orgasms are unexplored compared to women"I assume credibility is a matter of how much of a showboat someone is. Yes, widely known rental killers are a thing and totally credible". That's how pathetic you sound right know. Keeping a defensive front on important matters is a must to avoid leeches and quacks trying to sway off your project with their "opinions". | /r/MensRights | 18/12/22 05:51 AM |
| -2 | Inspired by this other post, I made an AI write a short essay on how male orgasms are unexplored compared to womenAnalyzing things through a naturalistic lens dehumanizes the parties involved. Gynocentric reesearchers don't give two shits if women are naturally meant to have less orgasms, and don't miss a chance to nag men to make them happen, so why should you accept those levels of inhumanity? | /r/MensRights | 17/12/22 02:30 PM |
| -1 | Inspired by this other post, I made an AI write a short essay on how male orgasms are unexplored compared to womenFor many years we had a running joke about just how many more orgasms she had compared to me. Even that joke implies a deep-rooted disdain for men: women's biological restraints must be overcame as much as possible, but men should always stay unattended because they're simple, one-shot ice cream machines. The prostate is never treated as a viable orgasm option for men in almost any article mentioning the theme, and no one fucking cares. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/22 02:23 PM |
| 1 | Inspired by this other post, I made an AI write a short essay on how male orgasms are unexplored compared to womenThe problem is in how people see the prostate as the weird kid no one wants to play with, but women and their 100 different orgasms need MORE research. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/22 05:33 AM |
| 1 | Feminists are the most sexist people toward women, but are benevolently sexist, not hostilely sexist. Hostile sexism (misogyny) is uncommon whereas more positive sexism is what actually affects women. Here's the REAL cause of actual hateful sexism (it's NOT patriarchy).I have a similar theory that also mixes MR with Communism. Patriarchy technically exists if we consider money is power, and that the top billionaires are men. But gynocentrism can exist in a patriarchal society who pushes it as the norm, which is the case. As for the reason a bunch of old men would want philogyny? Both because it's profitable and advantageous: by increasing competition and individuation among men while orchestrating their efforts to cater for women, they keep a consistent market… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/22 12:08 PM |
| 3 | Gay guys being accessories for straight girlsAnd that also gives the women the right to be all touchy feely and handsy with the gay boys just because they’re gay and “won’t hurt you?” This is what I hate the most. The average straight woman is extremely sexist and can only associate vulnerability and humanity to women. Since gay men have woman-like traits in a sexist's perspective, only they deserve to have their feelings and humanity recognized. It's a double-handed positive interaction for men because the targetting is not them, and that… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/22 12:02 PM |
| 3 | List of negative responses I've received on other subreddits for arguing against circumcision (as closely as I remember):Circumcision in the modern age was pushed by Christian fundamentalists and progressives as a way to "stop boys from masturbating." Specifically Will Keith Kellogg But women? Have lengthy studies on their clitoris as if it's a mystic (and sometimes literally called like that) organ. It borders absurdism that such blatant bias isn't noticed because sex is a weaponized and taken for granted matter. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/22 05:24 PM |
| 2 | "Nurse Who Won't Give Viagra to White Conservative Men Resigns" (June 29, 2022)This is yet another example of men treated like animals slave to their natural needs. She really thinks men are dogs begging for a snack here. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/22 07:05 PM |
| 0 | Reddit promotes hateThey dehumanize men That's it. Dehumanize is the word quite literally because all human-related qualities about anything are targeted towards women: they get benefit of the doubt, are seen as inherently valuable and used as a sign of power, a dynamic no one bats an eye on because is so taken for granted. Women pleasure is viewed as sacred and ethereal, while men's is shamed and seen as an one-noted experience not worth of deep research. As an example, articles talking about male climax never add… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/22 04:36 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter