TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Grim765 Archive

View 1 post and 95 comments by Grim765 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
66

Grim765/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:13 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

/r/FeMRAdebates
/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:57 AM
2

Your only post is about how much this subreddit sucks. It could have been written for 2 purposes: 1) To express your dislike of the subreddit and its followers in the most insulting way possible, without providing any examples. 2) To get people angry at you, a la troll.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:53 AM
2

Nice throw-away account. This is your only post. Stop trying to troll.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:45 AM
1

I don't see your point. Regardless of what you believe about feminism, it could theoretically be construed as misogynistic to believe that all feminists (the single most popular women's rights movement in America) are morons simply for being feminist.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:31 AM
3

Feminism is one of the most widespread movements in recent history. It is simply untrue to say that all feminists are morons. I myself am anti-feminism, however, I do believe it had a very important role in the forming of America as we know it. The main argument is "women's suffrage". Basically, if you say you wish feminism had never existed, then you are saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote, that women should not be equal to men. However, that time is past. Feminism is no longer neede…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:24 AM
5

No matter what happens, it will have a positive outcome. Either the feminists will vote brigade and show everyone how vote brigady they are, or they'll come here wanting to argue, which is a good chance to debate the topics.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:55 AM
2

If a male and female have the same job, with the same experience, and same work ethic, then they must be paid the same by law. So that's not the problem. And then, you have little things like the equal hiring acts, when you have to hire as many women as men. So that's not it. I wonder why the wage gap is so big. Oh right. Silly me. It isn't, and it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:53 PM
9

Many in the MRM are anti-feminism. One of the most common answers to question "Why does the MRM exist?" is "Because feminism is ignoring men's problems". There is no denying that most feminists are adamantly anti-MRA. Chances are, until there is a major reform among the radical feminist outlook, there will still be clashing between the 2 parties. It is impossible to not see the double standard against men. For example: The first two sentences on Wikipedia about Patriarchy: Patriarchy (rule by fa…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:03 PM
1

Can't tell if troll or special needs.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 01:01 AM
0

I was really, really hesitant to click on that imgur link.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 07:02 PM
3

The following is not true for every MRA, I feel that most would agree with it. When asked "Why do you need the MRM? Why not just be egalitarian?" The general response is "We need the MRM because Feminism tries to mask over men's problems".
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:42 PM
2

Rape is not a one-way street. Most rape is thought of as violent, but coercion, blackmail, and inebriation play a large role in most rapes. Often times, a woman rapes a man by: Getting him black-out drunk. Restraining him through use of rope or other rope-y things. Coercing him by threatening to do... coercive-y things. If she sticks her hand down your pants when you don't want her to, that is sexual assault. If she gets your pants down and you inside her, or her inside you, that's rape.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:05 AM
1

Anti-feminism is extremely common within the MRA. Don't worry, newbie, you'll become jaded just like the rest of us.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:12 AM
3

I got into the MRM in middle school, as well. It was when my heavily-feminist social studies teacher started blaming all men for the world's problems.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 10:44 PM
2

Please back up your opinions.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:36 AM
2

I think I'll delete that comment. In retrospect, the sarcasm is a little hard to detect.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 01:44 AM
7

Of course men can't be raped. In the event of rape, they can shut the whole thing down, just like women.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:10 AM
2

I didn't fully understand that last paragraph, but I agree with the first 2 (3?). I've never really understood the argument in the first place. "Why do you wear clothes?" Because it is socially acceptable. "Why do you wear those specific clothes?" So I look good. "So why do you complain when men look at you?" Because I'm being sexualized. "But... you're wearing a 4 inch miniskirt and a push-up bra" I want men to want me for who I am inside.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 04:33 AM
5

Because they can't fend for themselves. If there's a 5 year old stumbling around on deck, you wouldn't pick him up and put him on the lifeboat because "he isn't as resourceful" as you?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:01 PM
2

At what point?
/r/MensRights08/08/13 07:33 AM
3

One thing you aren't noticing is how much feminism hurts men. A Men's Rights Activist is probably male, although there are females. Here is a short list of things that feminist leaders have said about men. You might say that radical feminists aren't representative of the movement's ideal. You would be wrong. Radical, by definition, means the root, the fundamentals. Radicals are fundamentalists. Now, you might be saying that feminism doesn't hurt men. Again, you would be wrong. Feminists have dem…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 06:52 AM
1

Please, please, do a little proofreading. I don't even... She gave me false promise of marriage and for almost 3 years he used me emotionally . . I gave them expensive gifts in occasions as I considered just as my family . . I was earning pretty well so whatever his family needed I use to get them and I was supporting her . . these false promises of marriage by her After all I complained in the Human rights organization even they went to meet her she said that she will marry me only and after so…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 06:39 AM
6

This is just misinformation. We are not fine with the wage gap. We don't think it exists. Men are physically stronger than women. Is that basis for a woman to abuse a man? I can probably break someone's bone from a punch. I also know that I can break a bone if a woman swings iron at me. This is just incorrect. Um... I don't even... Who says the military is no place for women? Wait.. what? I still don't even... This is... not even... a little bit relevant. The majority do do it just to get laid. …
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:42 AM
10

I like how every back-and-forth goes something like this: Feminist - There is a glass ceiling that prevents women from moving up. Not-Feminist - There is no glass-ceiling. Feminist - Read more. You aren't looking at (femme-biased) news. Not-Feminist - What are you talking about? I am living this, and I don't have a "glass ceiling". Feminist - Well you can thank feminism for that.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:20 PM
1

The worst part is that misandry is underlined red in this text box.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 12:58 AM
1

I really, really hate to point this out, but the title should have the second quotation mark before argument, not after.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:31 PM
1

Hot damn. Nice refutation.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:40 PM
1

1 Yes, I do believe men are oppressed. Everybody in the western world knows the phrase "Women and children first". I, like literally everyone else here, agree with the "and children" part. However, the fact that this phrase is so prevalent in society means that men are perceived as disposable; that their life is worth less than a woman's. I'm going to direct you here. GirlWritesWhat gives a much more detailed explanation. I also recommend you watch the rest of her videos, as every single one is …
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:31 AM
2

Luckily, nothing I posted on Feminism has been deleted. I always backed up my shit, and never said anything disrespectful. Of course, neither did you.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:31 PM
2

Getting a boob job doesn't affect others in their life decisions.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:46 PM
8

Well said.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:40 PM
21

Its very hard to argue that the traditional role of women wasn't oppressive May I recommend you to this video. GirlWritesWhat makes a very compelling arguement.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:17 PM
3

They are completely comparing rates. There are 2 towns, let's call them M and F. M has 500 people and F has 1000. Now, let's say M has a 20% suicide rate, while F has a 10% suicide rate. When we look at a random person in both M and F, it is more likely that a person from M is going to commit suicide than a person in F.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:28 AM
2

100% her decision, 100% her responsibility. Think of it like this: A woman can do whatever she wants with her body when she is pregnant. Only after birth is the father figured in. If the father wants and abortion but the mother does not, who gives a fuck what the father wants. However, if she chooses not to have an abortion, only then does the father become legally involved. The only time fathers are involved in legality is when they need to spend the next 18 years for a child they never wanted.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:31 PM
8

If a woman becomes pregnant, she has some choices. She can get an abortion. She can actually raise the child. She can give the state custody of the child. The father was 0 reproductive rights, even if raped or spermjacked. No one here is arguing that men should control what a women does with her body. We are arguing that it is unfair that the father be forced into the consequences. The father has 2 (technically 3, but the third is jail) choices: stay with the mother for the next 18 years, or pay…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:53 PM
1

Oh haha. Thought it was a different comment thread where he was correcting a comment not a post.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:34 AM
4

How dare you. How dare you insult KFC. KFC is a gift from god to mere mortals. NEW with spicy chicken! Buy it today!
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:39 PM
1

Oh. I guess it just didn't make sense because OP changed it before I saw it.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:12 PM
1

I don't get it.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:59 AM
1

Well alrighty then. to join as a companion, partner, or ally: to associate oneself with a cause. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/associate
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:02 AM
1

As a general rule, I have found that the quiet majority of feminists are moderate. The same problem lies with theism. The radical fundamentalists are absolutely horrid, but if the fundamentalists are wrong, then maybe the fundamentals are wrong too. A quiet feminist only identifies as a feminist. It is those who speak out who define it. A slave-owner actively advocates slave-ownership, but those who quietly stand by, shaking their heads, don't do anything. A quiet feminist can't be ignored, as h…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:59 AM
0

Wait, the A is activist? I've always read as associate.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:06 AM
6

Annnnnnnnnnnd this just got weird.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:22 PM
8

Is this in the U.S.? The bullshit some people think.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:39 AM
4

Where did he say that?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:50 PM
0

Um, what?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:18 PM
22

This perfectly describes the hypocrisy of feminists. If a man is objectified, women are expressing their not-oppressed sexuality. When a woman is objectified, men are shallow pigs. If I don't find a woman attractive, I am a shallow pig. If I do, I am a shallow pig. If a sexy man is on the cover of a magazine, go gives a flying fuck? If a women is, it is a conspiracy by the patriarchy to oppress and objectify women. If a dirty joke is told about a man in the workplace, it's all fun and games. If …
/r/MensRights15/07/13 04:32 AM
1

Sure. I was reluctant to because of the sheer amount of sites and stats, but this has been a common request, so sure.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:50 AM
1

Ok. Thanks, that helped me out. I just started re-editing the post. Even if it's buried under 10 days of other content, I feel like I should keep updating and improving it.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:48 AM
1

just go to my account page and click the link to the post. It mentions pornography and anal, but no pics or anything.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:41 AM
1

Question. You helped me a lot with this so I thought I would ask you. With my inclusion of human sexuality in the post, should I label it NSFW?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:35 AM
1

Um... no?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:48 PM
4

Try to become a part of the conversation before that happens. Then, when they say that, produce a counter-point. Even a "well not really" in a light-hearted manner may prompt more discussion without pissing anyone off. If things do get heated, try to stay as calm as possible, but not smug or arrogant. Keep an even-level voice and try to exert your opinion using statistics, evidence, or experience. The moment you become defensive, or try to attack women in the same way, you've lost.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:45 PM
3

What u/orphanjunt said. Being without a father really sucks, but I would rather live with my mother than live with 2 parents who hated each other and a father who didn't want me. It sucks for the father for being in this predicament, it sucks for the mother for being single, with all the financial and parental obligations it brings, and it sucks that the child won't know his biological father probably.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:29 PM
0

Pretty much. He has some good stuff like "33 reasons not be a feminist" but then he has shit like "Impeach Obama" because 8 years in office is obviously not enough to at least tell people to chill the fuck out. He isn't a great president but people like TheAmazingAthiest throw the word "impeach" around way to much.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:22 AM
1

I think your wording could be a little better. I believe abortion is as much a man's right as a women's. Not because then "feminists would own it" which is total bullshit, but because the consequences directly, legally, affect the father. If the father cannot choose to have an abortion, fine, it's her body. However, if she refuses to abort, the father is stuck with either a lifetime commitment or 20 years of financial obligation. An argument could be made that a man consent to the possibility of…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:14 AM
1

I live with my mother, and I do see my father occasionally. My parents got divorced when I was 10 years old, and I never reconnected with my father. When I was kid he was a drunk and karate black belt, so he was scary as fuck and could kick your ass. He's better now, but I don't feel any connection to him. My point is, even if he is your son, if you fuck things up early or just plain don't see him, chances are he'll never really feel like your son.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 10:30 PM
2

Look, u/tansincosine, even if you do not identify as a feminist, you are obviously biased on the subject. Besides the wage gap, you continue to oppose every point every subscriber has listed. Generally, if multiple people agree on something, even if not the truth, it is the perception. You are perceived as a feminist, as you are trying (but failing) to refute what the MRA says. You obviously value feminism over men's rights. Your beliefs are your own, but this is r/MensRights, so don't expect us…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 09:29 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:18 AM
1

Nope. You fixed your post. While I can't expect you to change your more dismissive comments, it's enough to change how you are viewed in this community, which is good enough for me.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:16 AM
1

Ok, I'm done. You changed the post and now I'm happy.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:09 AM
2

don't tell you dislike me just because you don't like what I said. Really? That is why most people decide to like or dislike anyone. Unless someone saved a bus filled with children or equally heroic act, that person will be judged almost entirely by what they say. Especially on the internet. Especially especially on reddit.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:03 AM
1

You're right. I get easily offended by shit like this. I just wanted to show her why she is generally disliked here. I'm sorry for that. Sometimes my innate anger of dismissal gets the better of me.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:58 AM
2

Don't take my anger out on you? I told you every single reason why I dislike you. It is not unfounded. Your being a feminist is a conjecture I came to after you dismissed the inequality facing men. I am not taking my anger out on you any more than a Jew would punch a nazi in the face (please don't misconstrue that into me comparing feminists to nazis, I'm just making a point). Even if that particular nazi in no way directly harmed the jew, he is still enforcing nazi law. The jew has every right …
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:55 AM
3

Your post has not changed, and I already said why I dislike it. Actually, I have given multiple quotes of yours from this post. I obviously read them. Labeling you? You are a feminist, obviously. Had you been an equal rights activist, you would have immediately seen the point of r/MensRights. I call you third-wave because you do not show any evidence of women's oppression. While it obviously exists, both in first and third world countries, you do not have enough experience, expertise, or knowled…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:49 AM
3

If you truly wanted to apologize, you need to change your post. Your apology is in one thread, beneath several comments. You cannot expect someone to dig through every single comment to find the apology. Also, only read what made me angry? 90% of what you said made me angry. Change your posts or you'll make more people angry. Also, "fuck off" isn't a great response.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:32 AM
6

That fact that you asked a question does not matter. You obviously have true bias, and that bias was met with disdain. You are no better than the men you say oppress you. I don't get you people. at all. A classic example. You start by alienating the people of this subreddit. The phrase itself has a very negative connotation. Instead of wanting to learn the truth about gender equality, you enter the discussion without a real want to learn. Imagine if a creationist wanted to an evolutionist to pro…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:23 AM
4

This is why I love this subreddit. The MRA doesn't tolerate bullshit. If someone makes claims, saying they have evidence but refusing to present, it is of general response to tell them to go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:56 AM
-1

I feel like this post should be removed. It simply advertises another without adding anything to it. Even a repost is better than this.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 12:37 AM
1

Why you gots to be like dat?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:55 PM
4

Exactly. It is scientifically proven that a male being within 100 miles of a women causes a transformation, a metamorphosis, into what scientists call "Nothing Fucking Changes Get The Fuck Over It".
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:44 AM
1

While I have the resources for all the points you contested, you did point out some errors I myself made. Namely, it isn't 7.5, it's 13.98. (did 1,430,000/200,000 not 200,000/1,430,000). Also, thanks for pointing out the major lack of clarity regarding enlisted vs officers. That is the difference in percentages, not the numbers themselves. The actual %s range from 6-15% and 6-18% respectively.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 05:48 PM
2

These are true statistics. I try to avoid changing numbers to percentages as it alienates either feminists or MRA. For example, had I said the percentage, it would seem biased for feminism. If I leave out the percentage and let the readers figure out the percentage for themselves, it seems less biased. It is like if I said: * 30% of corporations are secretly owned by satan. and * There are 100 corporations in the world. * 70 are not owned by satan. I'll look back at this comment in the morning. …
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:35 AM
1

u/Diamicton, please stop coming to r/MensRights and saying things like this. You called me butthurt and virgintastic for listing statistics regarding gender equality. I posted it both on r/MensRights and r/Feminism. There was 0% bias in the post, as it has an extensive resource list, and every statistic had a number for both men and women. Please stop coming to r/MensRights if you are neither a MRA or someone who simply wants to learn more about it. I visit r/Feminism from time to time to see wh…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 05:16 AM
1

Can you back either of those insults with facts? Quotes? Any plausible reason you would think this? Literally a single quote from those statistics that implies I am virgintastic and butthurt would make me happy. Of course this is coming from someone who said, in the context of a cat meowing for food, to Just throw him into the goddamned wall for a couple of mornings and he'll stop that shit real quick like my roommate's cat did.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:46 AM
1

Alright. Well if you find it, message me so I can put it up.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 03:43 AM
1

Um... no? It's the other way around. Only 5% of the convicted are falsely convicted, so it would, by simple logic, be accurate to say that 5% of rape reports are false, not true. EDIT: Let me rephrase that, as when I read my comment again, it didn't make a lot of sense. Because 5% are falsely convicted, 5% of reports are not true.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 03:01 AM
31

That is what I thought too. Before this subreddit, I thought the MRA was full of shitholes. Now I see the real gender inequality masked over by feminism.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:24 AM
2

My bad, put "by women" in the wrong place. Still, 216,000 men though
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:35 PM
1

As I said in my other replies, when I use numbers, I don't guess. There is a 5% false accusation rate. There is definitely more, but not recorded. Therefore, it would be more fallacious to include it in the statistics than to not.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:21 PM
1

Well, yes and no. There are lots of cases where a women would falsely accuse, and then come back in a year or so and admit she lied. EDIT: Also, cases where a rape was investigated and proved to be false.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 09:47 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 09:13 PM
1

Would you mind if I copy/pasted that in the post?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:45 PM
1

That is all true. However, these are the official statistics. There are no statistics on what you are mentioning. I'll add in some stuff though.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:34 PM
4

Damn I'm making a lot of edits. I added the "99% of recognized rape is committed by men. EDIT: already had it... namely, male rape victims are counted when they are raped by another man. I recognize that women rape too, but there aren't reliable stats on it
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:30 PM
2

Again, thanks for the input. Added that into the statistics. However, this is an unbiased post. It is posted in /r/MensRights, so I expected some retaliation in regards to the crime section, as men are statistically more likely to commit violent crime.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:26 PM
4

My mistake. I changed the stats a little to clarify. Namely, it is not 7.5 mil, it is 10,000 per year. Glad you pointed that out. Also, added "recognized" into the mix for rape victims.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:21 PM
1

Every time there is a FB post like this, the Feminist always tries to explain herself to no avail. "When I said MEN the last 32 times, I actually meant white, privilaged, middle-upper class, right-wing, pro-life politicians who I see on the news once a month and I am outraged at men because of it.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:38 AM
3

It is a cycle. Feminism has twisted the facts to suit their goals. Just look at the subreddit to find examples. This fact-twisting directly demonizes men. Therefore, when a MRA comes forward, people (mainly women) hate him for it. They think that he is as terrible as Feminists say. This means that the MRA can barely get their views out, and the Feminists can continue to eschew the facts without the other side (MRA) to state their views, opinions, or facts.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:24 AM
3

This post deserves way more attention than it is getting.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:06 AM
3

The "end patriarchy" part at the end of every single point means that these feminists aren't trying to solve men's problems, they are furthering their own goals and trying make it look like they are doing it for us. However, props to them for working to actual equalization and not just the advancement of feminists.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 09:13 PM
1

Yah, but the meme in question acts like NO father pays child support, by generalizing all single women.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:56 PM
1

She doesn't know what the hell she is talking about. My mom is single, and makes a 1/3 of the average salary. I practically live on child support. Without my dad making payments, we would would be living on food stamps and in our car.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:29 PM
2

While I agree with the core concept of the article, it is missing the point of an abortion. Namely, in abortion and adoption, BOTH parents walk away. However, if one walks, the other then has a huge responsibility for life. If the mother wants the baby, but the father leaves, the mother then is single, and has the biggest responsibility in the world.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:59 PM
1

Feminism is the equalization of the 2 sexes by focusing on the problems of one.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter