TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GrouchNslouch777 Archive

View 0 posts and 222 comments by GrouchNslouch777 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

To overcomplicate the simple enough to sell courses and books to gullible men
/r/seduction26/10/25 12:36 PM
3

Dude unless you're banging all these women or they're making moves your assessments here are mostly head canon.
/r/seduction21/08/25 09:54 PM
0

In literally any other walk of life if one group deems another group unfit to propagate their genetic line we rightly can conclude that those groups ain't and never can be friends. Yet people will swear up and down that some woman who thinks the exact same of them....can be. Humans are strange apes 4reel.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 03:10 AM
1

Standard nonsense OP: misreprents the men to minimize the truth (women).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 07:56 PM
19

Women link anything they don't like about you to a moral or character flaw because they conflate their feelings with right and wrong. Stereotypes prove themselves true constantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 02:50 AM
0

Yawn 0/10 trololol ✌️
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:41 AM
0

since you are also of the belief that people don't know whether they like one another within a few moments, you also should review the homework.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:31 AM
0

sure dude telling people to research very specific things is somehow a word salad...perhaps to people who insist on not knowing what they're talking about or being deliberately obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:20 AM

and you confirm you really have no clue. Do the homework and you might learn something ✌️
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:19 AM

it really isn't but this take is so reality removed it doesn't merit much response beyond pointing out how nonsensical it is Homework: basic research on factors that matter in dating based on real dating decisions, research on first impression formation and their resistance to change, research on gini coefficients between men and women in OLD, etc. Grade: not even wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:12 AM

every complaint women have about dating concerns situations where the structural power imbalance they enjoy flips on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 06:58 AM
1

no shortage of women wanting commitment without sex (dates and public outings).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 02:31 AM
-1

ya women say a lot of stupid shit when facing situations where they dont get default leverage.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 12:21 AM
-1

Ideally yes but more realistic approach = One public outing at a bar and maybe one drink max. Escalate and either close same night or 2nd "date" is at your house or hers. And then just meet and hookup until she demonstrates she's worth being around in public. Pretty standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 09:47 PM
1

News at 11 group is silent when the power imbalance favors them
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 07:18 AM
3

A man 2+ points above a woman in attractiveness....to that woman. That's where you see the same treatment. For a man to get that treatment from a sizable amount of women its usually like 8+/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 10:55 PM
-2

Because it's all about relative attraction. Any man (almost) can get the chad treatment.....from a woman around 2 points lower than him on the standard scale. Women are sexually hypergamous but there are limits. They can't punch up more than 2 points or so even offering NSA sex. So a female 2 can be attracted to a male 4 even though they're both ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:02 AM
2

Part 1: accepting the truth is mental illness Part 2: I don't know anything about what research says on this very topic Sick take.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:31 PM
1

Yeah lady, its just been all economic dystopia since then. Except it hasn't and regardless of feast or famine economic times...the trendline is clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 06:08 PM
2

I don't say that. The GSS and other data does.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 05:37 PM
-4

The nonsensical neoliberal reading of things. There is no such thing as "empowering yourself" against systemic imbalance. It has nothing to do with tradition. Women are hyper social and follow the group; hence they are told to believe x and they believe x. Women don't care about heroism or character. Women will absorb the beliefs and disposition of whatever group they are in. Which is why fathers/parents usually had a huge hand in vetting suitors in the past. Because left to their own devices wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:22 AM
-5

We're about to see a return to the norm. AI is about to completely crush female economic power (75% of jobs gone are ones held by women). It's about to crush female sexual power (AI companion revenue growth is skyrocketing). Once an artificial womb appears it'll be GG. Women oppose re empowering men because of cultural propaganda. Women are not happier under feminism. It has failed. Mental health crisis, less happy in their relationships and marriages, low fertility rate, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:12 AM
-3

This is such a garbage tier reading of history contradicted by literal research: women were happier in their marriages in the past than they are now. Like that's how you know woke feminism is cooked...it has to make shit up to even seem palatable because by every objective indicator women are miserable under it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:08 AM
0

Except we have a long historical record of women having lower standards. One where the fertility rate was high, women were happier with their lives and marriages and less mental health problems in general: as in documented fact. Slop take.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:06 AM
3

You can't know for sure. This is a lesson in EV and leverage. You give every woman benefit of the doubt. Best case outcome: you get a woman who likes you for you and it's great. Worst case outcome: many and varied from using you for attention and time, making you wait while clapping someone else, getting into an LTR where you find she basically settled for you, etc. You give 0 women the benefit of the doubt. Best case outcome: you get a woman who likes you for you. Worst case outcome: she's a sl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 10:08 AM
1

Yeah you don't really know what the male and female gaze are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 06:29 AM
2

https://share.google/GdZKyJp0jitqYAD5P
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 05:12 AM
4

They're already collapsing bruh. This take belongs in 2019.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 05:02 AM
1

Then I only disagree about the hit rate, like I said in my response.
/r/seduction05/08/25 10:51 PM
1

LMFAO Yeah bro Janka is lying. One of the OGs of the entire sed community just doesn't know wtf he's talking about. So much fantasy larping on this sub
/r/seduction05/08/25 10:21 PM
-2

Almost none of those are misconceptions and are all true. Its unclear if you mean what you list are the misconceptions or if you are correcting misconceptions btw. Except 10-20% of women a normal man (even a super hot man) talks to being high interest. Like this experiment has been run: Paul Janka was a tall literal male model ivy league educated super into game dude who cold approached women and kept a spreadsheet. Of the women who gave him their number 5% converted to lays. And this was in 200…
/r/seduction05/08/25 08:53 PM
5

Usually dip if it's clear we're not meeting up the 2nd time at my or her place for sex
/r/seduction05/08/25 06:02 AM
0

Study finds LGBQ people report higher rates of adverse childhood experiences than straight people, worse mental health as adults https://news.vumc.org/2022/02/24/study-finds-lgbq-people-report-higher-rates-of-adverse-childhood-experiences-than-straight-people-worse-mental-health-as-adults/ The current study provides significant evidence that CSA is associated with later sexual offending even when accounting for powerful clinical and criminological covariates https://www.sciencedirect.com/science…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 02:21 AM
-1

LGTBQ individuals are disproportionately more likely to have been abused as children and as we know those who experience said abuse themselves go on to commit the very same abuse at disproportionate rates. The incidence between each phenomenon isn't even close but go on about blowing the lid off of 30+ year old scandals.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 01:54 AM
-1

I love when non Christians pretend beliefs subscribed to and defended by thinkers of far greater stature than they are somehow necessarily irrational. Sure Augustine, Aquinas, and co. just were incapable of the midwit worldview you've reached.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 08:27 PM
-3

No your entire premise is that "conversion" = hatred which requires a reductive understanding that is itself controversial ON TOP of the fact that its an outlier and in no way compares to the mental dysfunction present in these communities and toxicity eg. lesbians having the highest DV rates. You keep acting as though there's simply 0 connection between belief systems that are obviously connected then point to someone who YOU BELIEVE is a hypocrite and actually a materialist due to their materi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 07:51 PM
-5

Extreme outlier case that relies on the assumption that such methods are somehow hateful when there is a real documented link between early age child abuse both sexual and non sexual and homosexuality and a biologically reductionist cause is dubious as best. Then equating it to the documented mental health issues and intolerance that plague LGTBQ communities. Check. Being deliberately obtuse and failing to understand that to embrace materialism is to exalt the self which cuts to the core sin of …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:06 PM
7

You mean the thousands upon thousands of tik toks, articles in prominent publications written about men checking out (one was recently in the NYT) showing that women indeed are noticing and feel upset about it. Sure its allllll just fake.... Keep waving dem hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 02:30 PM
2

Pretty bad discernment for what the voices in your head are. Get that checked.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 02:19 PM
9

I know...like convergent evidence showing 80% of men under age 30 have never approached a woman and of the others half haven't in the past year, less HS dating, lower workforce participation, most young men being single and half of those young men not even seeking out dating or sex, all consistent with those tik toks.... Yeah sure. IT MUST NOT BE REEL IF IT'S ON A REEL LOL Gaslight more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 02:08 PM
-4

And yet it's like you didn't even read or understand what I said. Lol at that height he will hate women in 10 or 20 years. Especially with how society is going. If he had been taught properly he'd maybe have figured things out by now and begun enacting a strategy to date on his terms and overcome that disadvantage. But now thanks to no doubt the gaslighting you and others are giving him, he's going to suffer for the best years of his life before he gets it. Great misandrist parenting. Friendly w…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 02:02 PM
14

Literally thousands upon thousands of tik toks where women complain men arent approaching them and arent interested in relationships anymore. If anything...women are the ones who won't shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 01:56 PM
-4

Vast overstatement of LGBTQ persecution while ignoring the disproportionate toxicity and hatred within LGTBQ culture. Check. Failure to understand the theological point of failing to believe in God being per se leading to self worship i.e. union with satanic worship. Check. Failure to acknowledge that anti natalism is a destructive ideology that if left unchecked would destroy the human race. Check. Pretty standard gaslighting, strawmanning, inversion. The gang's all here!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 01:54 PM
-4

^ casual misandry that is being baked into the youth and internalized by men. What a gas "lol." Clownworld.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 01:50 PM
0

Says the guy desperately qualifying himself. Nah I'm good, enlighten yourself with Google. Plenty of research and replicated findings on the matter. Godspeed, "playa" ✌️
/r/seduction04/08/25 06:06 AM
0

Vague woowo subjective determinations that run against peer reviewed research and anecdotal experience. Tell me what else you read in the Mystery Method and have misinterpreted as fact? The only one without a clue here is you. Which is why you're over here repeating meme level "truths" that have been debunked by the best available research studying dating decisions in real life and online. A vagina isn't a leader of men test, a moral character test, a personality inventory, or an IQ test and dud…
/r/seduction04/08/25 04:19 AM
0

Yeah. You flip them with face height and muscles. You capitalize on the opportunity by escalating. There is no "you flip" the levers. She looks at you and they're flipped or they aren't.
/r/seduction04/08/25 04:10 AM
-2

Not really. They'd have less trouble if they were just more feminine kind and submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 08:00 PM
4

Its sad people wont admit how superficial dating is. For men like... Bro who cares if she's hot, its way better to have a chick who's truly into you. Who you don't have to perform for. If shes truly attracted to you you can kinda do whatever the fuck you want. We need to end simping..no free attention. Simping is caused by this erroneous belief that dating isn't superficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 07:51 PM
5

Yeah dude well I've seen it in real life. That short dude i mentioned who got with mids? In his 30s he got LL to normal height and surprise surprise: nothing but hotties The average white dude...once he went back to his own race, nothing but mids. Its pretty basic shit lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 07:46 PM
7

Great take. A really short but really gl guy for example with a mid woman (explained by height) A hot black chick with a more normal white guy (race). Like these are outliers and you definitely dont see them everyday.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 07:23 PM
6

So glad more people are waking up to this exact fact regarding how men and women are appraised.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 07:21 PM
11

Please stop repeating this nonsense. No you don't see hot women with normies every day. What we see is culture vastly over rating women (even Sydney is extremely overrated in the face) and under rating men. So when you may get 2 average looking people together the woman will just get a lot of unearned praise for being the hot one even if she's just as unremarkable as the man. Why? Because post feminism women want to base their worth on the caliber of man who would fuck them for a night. Which ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 07:21 PM

Sure if one invents a meaning for settling other than the real one. A broke homeless woman isn't settling by choosing a homeless man and vice versa. You aren't settling if you ARE maximizing what you can REALISTICALLY get. You're confusing delusion with reality based thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 07:16 PM

OP doesn't even understand the take they're lambasting. It's not that women are attracted to hot men. That's not the issue people are having. The critique is that a combination of cultural factors have made even below average women believe they are settling unless they are with a hot guy. Which just results in many women sleeping with but never obtaining any meaningful relationship with those hot men. Meanwhile the men who would have them for relationships are either disregarded by these same wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 07:12 PM
-1

They're the only serious choice if you're interested in dismantling your relationship. FYP Further the culture surrounding all LGBTQ and alternative spaces is way overhyped for being tolerant. In reality they're some of the most narcy, underhanded, toxic people around. Not all of them (embarassing to have to include this) but a disproportionate share occupy those spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 10:53 PM
5

Yes. It makes no sense when the world's oldest profession is women weaponizing sex for money. Grade: F
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 01:14 PM
0

People who rail about generalizations strike me as profoundly ridiculous. There is no human existence, social or otherwise, without generalizations, stereotypes, and pattern recognition.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 07:28 AM
0

They aren't being held accountable. The same thing they did to others is being done to them (worse in many cases as their literal geo location and address is being revealed). There's a difference. Karma, sure. Accountability.....that CAN be argued. There's overlap there but also debate. You run the risk of saying that holding people accountable involves doxxing which forces you to commit to saying doxxing is a way to hold people accountable. Which is a spicy meatball. Women being held accountabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 09:41 PM

Oscar Isaac and Pedro Pascal = average Lol Delete thread OP, you done goofed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 05:48 PM
4

You don't. If a woman is legit hooked on you and some guy comes over and tries to posture and get attention, that's great. He can only make you look better. It's yours to lose by just giving him too much attention. The best power move when some guy tries to say she isn't interested or that he's her boyfriend is to just nod and walk off: most of the time she will follow you. Getting into the weeds of going back and forth with AMOG is a losing game 100% of the time. Learning to recognize men who a…
/r/seduction01/08/25 12:58 AM
-1

Could i elaborate on basic biology 101 and give an attendant lecture? No thanks. If youre curious, use google.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 11:47 PM
2

Yeah bro. And the reason prank contacts exploded with the invention of the telephone was globalization too, right? Or was it technology empowering people to do something they were already doing. Your OP is the equivalent of saying all human behavior is genetic: true in the sense that we all have DNA, false in any material non trivial sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:04 PM
1

If it's fitting less than 20% then it's useless. Plenty of the dynamics you describe often appear in relationships where we'd colloquially term the woman as being with an "alfalfa male." That's the entire point. You're making a lot of assumptions on intentions behind behavior, i.e. a mother son dynamic can and often does occur in relationships where a woman is punching way above her weight. And it isn't because she views herself as settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:56 PM
3

No i don't agree with your point of globalization, a phenomenon that dates back to pre WW2 as being responsible for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:45 PM
1

They also show their friends the interactions, tell them about what happens, etc. 99% of the vetting mechanisms women use to vet men say nothing about a man's character, so sort of a trivial point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:33 PM
0

That that's nonsense. Women are attracted to how they feel toward you (which you can't control and has a randomness component to it). The only factor in your control that generates feeling in them is your SUPERFICIAL attractiveness. Nothing you say matters. What matters is that they like you on sight/sound.
/r/seduction31/07/25 07:04 PM
0

Even today women have communities and social groups IRL that they vet men with. Women show their friends dating app pics. The city-wide AWDTSG is just an extension of their personal whisper network. It has almost 0 to do with actually vetting anyone and more just scratches the incessant impulse women have for gossip.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 06:10 PM
6

No. AWDTSG is just another manifestation of whisper networks, which predate all the phenomena you're listing as the main causes. The Red Pill is a coherent (if somewhat incorrect) approach to dating. AWDTSG has no philosophy or ethos about men. It's just a gossip board amped by tech. No one would ever call the notebooks girls pass around in middle school about boys a red pill for women or something caused by globalization etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:57 PM
1

Gonna get downvoted here but if you heed my words OP you will succeed. Going to the gym and yoinking some weights ain't gonna be enough. You need to be willing to take radical action. Look at what many other successful guys do. For example, insane dieting + steroids = the type of body that women will respond to. You gotta understand the environment of the modern age. Youre trying to pull for casual sex which means you need to stand out. There are NOT that many successful men. That's the point. Y…
/r/seduction31/07/25 11:28 AM
1

Depends on your looks. In the abstract no one gives a shit. Id say up until your 50s casually banging girls in their early 20s isnt a big deal if you LOOK GOOD.
/r/seduction31/07/25 11:23 AM
0

If you need to go meet older women to get opportunities with them, this is a bad sign. Older women are pretty desperate and will hop on your dick if youre even remotely attractive to them. I'd say that you should just go monk mode and fix yourself up to where you can easily get young thin women to casually fuck you. Because if you can do that, you'll never have to ask this question again. Older women will just appear.
/r/seduction31/07/25 11:21 AM
-1

Height, brah. Edit: when women reject you the only reason is always they are not attracted to you. The reasons are always the same: wrong face wrong race wrong height wrong muscles. That's it that's all.
/r/seduction31/07/25 11:14 AM
0

Why do you keep flirting with me in lieu of addressing the defects in your OP? Do you think tossing out mean girl rhetoric will distract everyone away from your inability to discuss like a man? Do you think demanding clout when you've been given logic already is a good look?
/r/seduction31/07/25 11:07 AM
0

no one questions your ability to flirt with men. Try learning how to get women. Then you'll be able to write a guide that is useful.
/r/seduction31/07/25 11:03 AM
0

banged enough hot chicks to def know you arent the one to be asking questions..especially after that slop OP.
/r/seduction31/07/25 10:53 AM
0

There's literally 0 actionable tips in there showing how to escalate..it's clogged up with "inner game" woowoo, getting a wing (waste of time), advice on things that don't matter (a field report journal lmao). Nothing there helps anyone do anything. Its essentially 1..plan on doing stuff 2. Get a fwend! 3. Weed a book! 4. write down ur feefees 5. it'll all work out! Yaaaa. ^ Useless brah.
/r/seduction31/07/25 10:49 AM
-2

Exception that proves the rule logic.
/r/seduction31/07/25 10:16 AM
1

Except that alpha and beta (and gamma) are all male reprpductive strategies that appear across nearly all sexually reproducing species and exhibit nearly equivalent levels of fitness: hence them persisting. So this idea that she treats him like someone without a sex drive really misses the mark. But even just observing people in relationships there are way too many exceptions often times to neatly demarcate these traits you've listed out as occurring exclusively in "betabucks" relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:30 AM
-12

Still not understanding why that is eh? Study my comment more boyo. You could learn much from it.
/r/seduction31/07/25 03:15 AM
-3

LOL bad logic. So many men come at this with a TAKER BEGGER mindset of WHAT CAN I GET That depends on WHAT YOU CAN GIVE DUDE If youre not an LA 9 then youre not going to be easily pulling LA 7's no matter WHERE you are. FOCUS ON YOURSELF and the 304s fall into line. Some good girls too.
/r/seduction31/07/25 02:57 AM
2

Wow. So if the complaint from men is that women sleep with bad boys and offer sexual access, then saying women dont tolerate bad boys they just sleep with them doesnt do anything to respond to the alleged complaint. But sure, get offended by an irrelevant tangent so that you can moral posture yourself into a red herring.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:52 AM
2

Please quote where I said I only value women for their pussy. Oh right I never did because you need to make up phantoms to argue with because you can't step to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:47 AM
0

These takes need to die. The only game = knowing how to escalate. Have an INNOCENT REASON to touch. Have the balls to capitalize on that opportunity. Have a PLACE to fuck. Have an INNOCENT REASON to go there. The vast majority of this nonsense is completely irrelevant to getting women. How you feel about yourself and the words you spit = 0 utility. Figuring out what superficial quality is preventing you from attracting women = correct move with high ROI. Do whatever it takes to just LOOK GOOD. W…
/r/seduction31/07/25 02:45 AM
1

Some of my most abundant times with women have been periods of uncertainty and depression/struggle. If you know 1. How to screen IN women who are down for you and 2. Screen OUT all women who arent, you won't have any issues. Also, a take that's going to be downvoted to oblivion on this sub but if you really think your "charisma" and "words" attracted women you're still not too high on the "how things work" ladder.
/r/seduction31/07/25 02:34 AM
23

Your logistics are wrong then. Ditch dinner dates. That's boyfriend framing so youre already shooting yourself in the foot mentally. Youre also seated across from her so idk where youre escalating on these chicks with kino for you to be expecting sex. So youre shooting yourself in the foot in terms of gradual escalation. Meet at a bar where you can sit right next to her on some kind of couch in low lighting. Start touching her fast (make up any bullshit excuse. Have her give you a hand massage o…
/r/seduction31/07/25 02:29 AM
23

Lol. Bruh. You said every attempt to escalate physically gets shut down. Sometimes women don't want to go all the way on the first date. Here's the context that happens in: you're making out hot and heavy you start kissing her neck or something and she slightly pushes you away or something and says "not tonight" or "not yet." And then you either smash anyway or you smash the next time you meet her. Point being; they definitely are receptive to all prior physical advances.
/r/seduction31/07/25 02:22 AM
56

Because you're on dates with women who arent that into you.
/r/seduction31/07/25 02:15 AM
2

You're confusing modernity with all of history. You're also wandering away from the point. There is ample research demonstrating the halo effect and how susceptible women are to it. There is ample research showing women stay in abusive relationships for many years. There's even ample research showing that the right face height and race are worth literally MILLIONS of dollars to women. Youre not contending with any point you just keep wandering around trying to talk about other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 11:03 PM
2

That wasn't a response to what I said. There are real facts that contradict your vision of reality: many women staying long term in abusive relationships, mainly. The real truth is that women ARE very superficial and WILL tolerate extreme deviations in behavior to procure what they deem to be a higher status male. It makes them FEEL GOOD to be degraded in many instances because it reinforces their GOOD mate choice. These are facts you're not really contending with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 10:31 PM
2

Such a slop tier take that even the examples you give undermine you i.e. he couldn't keep any of the women he got sexual access to. Um. Okay so he gets the best part essentially from girl after girl.....the MAIN part that men who complain struggle with... But this just isn't really true. Researchers have recorded many many women stating the best sex of their lives was after getting the shit beaten out of them. So no dude its not as simple as you're making it out to be. Like which is it? Are ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 10:17 PM

The lie regarding nice guys is that women like men based on anything beyond 1. How attracted to them they are + 2. How much attention they get from those men. When people understand that women are pretty simple creatures governed almost solely by the halo effect we can understand once more.... ...that their opinions on such things just aren't to be taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 06:30 PM
2

Also wrong. Men give attractiveness ratings to women far more generously than women give to men. And again they aren't on average spending much money on of women at all. OF women have to whore themselves out at low prices to thousands of men to gain any kind of real income. To say that one dude tossing 5-50 bucks per month at you = extracting max value from a man is insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 06:11 PM
-1

Stop being emotionally vulnerable with anyone. While your close male friends MAY be able to handle it....you can't control what anyone does with sensitive information once they have it. There is 0 utility in "venting" your problems. You need to solve your problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 06:09 PM
-3

Except most male OF subs are married. And they don't spend much per person. Its like saying them going to the zoo and tossing crackers at an animal for it to perform for them = them orbiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 06:06 PM

No it's not more for you. Did you not even get the point i was making lol Your second question (lame posturing and status jockeying that demonstrated you forgot the entire thrust of discussion) cements my point. Your "tooling" attempts are hack af: a symptom of WEAK social acumen. You said today's dating environment is better than prior dating environments. When I gave reasons for why this isn't the case, you fell apart and tried to make this some kind of personal thing. And you did it in a way …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:54 PM

Women preferring to date IRL != women being equally approachable. Further, you wouldnt know how much you're over or underestimating anything because you've never learned the skill of ACTIVELY pursuing a woman. The best relationships I've ever had have been a mix of both. And it's way way way cooler to approach a woman who didn't notice you and escalate that into a lay on your terms than just hitting the ball back when she hits it. So no dude, you just don't know what you don't know. Which is fur…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:25 PM

Slop tier nonsense take. Lower female standards for approach in the past = more slack to practice and learn in the only environment that counts: REAL LIFE = more opportunities to improve without social setbacks = way better. Youre over here patting yourself on the back for "not messing it up" when women are clearly into you. You understand that millennials and boomers had multiple ways to generate leads. The leads you're talking about are the equivalent of free bingo spaces. The fact that in thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 08:43 PM
8

Is 20% VERY RARE? :) :) :) :)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:39 AM
9

Your OP says it is VERY RARE. 80-20 is a majority minority split. But 20% isnt rare by any stretch of the imagination nor is it very rare. My point actually isnt that some women dont use men for free food and resources. My point is that a good amount of women flip this dynamic because they value sexual access in certain circumstances as much as men do. Which means that your entire OP is just a distant cousin of something everyone already knows: the 80/20 rule for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:58 AM
10

So the OP doesnt say "VERY RARE?"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:39 AM
6

A minority != very rare. And it really doesn't matter. What would you say that minority is interested in? Exclude any sugar mama arrangements, btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:26 AM
19

Idk there are women who financially support men and feed them. What are they interested in getting?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:23 AM
5

0/10 trololol New grade: F-tier shitpost. Can't believe this garbage isnt modded.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 04:20 AM
0

No one's standards have anything to do with emotional maturity so idk why we are larping on this. How attractive they are + how willing they are to put up with you = all of your dating decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 01:53 AM
1

This is a flat out lie that people eat up. A woman cannot replace a man easily in a relationship. If that were true, so many women wouldn't constantly complain about not being able to find a man willing to commit to them. Women can find another man to have sex with yes. No they cannot easily find another man to treat them like something beyond a sexbot. Women move on faster after a relationship ends because 1. They are getting under new people and can ride those feelings 2. They live in a world …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 01:49 AM
4

Wrong. Even if every dude on a dating app showed his bros a pic of a woman in the locker room that is maybe 1-5 men who see her and who can spill tea. WHICH WOMEN ALSO DO. There is a huge difference between posting private info to thousands or millions of women you don't even know vs your few girlfriends or bros. F tier slop take. The rest isn't worth addressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 01:40 AM

Lol they arent measures to fight bad men. They're gossip factories and revenge fulfillment. The main issue is the same as it ever was: taking women seriously. So now they get to defame and dox to their heart's content ruining whoever's lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 09:17 AM

OP starts off with a good point but then falls prey to pretending that both genders equally engage in this kind of crap. Men who complain about a universal force rejecting them usually aren't wrong. Either theyre too short too ugly the wrong race too scrawny. Women otoh, simply arent meaningfully held back by those objective barriers and instead held back by their own misguided preferences. Women are more likely to engage in the "all men are x" nonsensical narratives that cast them as victims th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 09:15 AM
-1

What people fail to grasp is that women aren't only weaker physically... ...they're much weaker morally. There's no worse person on the planet than a woman with leverage. Even when they think they have leverage they're terrible. The manosphere gets some things right but gets a lot wrong. The hustle bro "everyone can hustle their way to being above average" is fucktarded and just beta+ messaging. There's also a lot of teaching surrounding controlling women as well. Like bro, if you gotta "lay dow…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 08:57 AM
2

Yeah I'd assume a lot of nonsense about other people too if I couldn't really defend my points.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 12:22 AM
1

Yeah you keep making weird assumptions. Like most people don't want women to "have practice" having the reins or whatever. And lol a woman who needs a vibrator to get off has burned out her clit with toys: again, more her problem than any "deficiency" with anyone else. Lol dude again if the woman is truly into you she will like pretty much whatever you do past a threshold of competence so low it borders on "don't have down syndrome" bro. There is no "good at sex" there are people who have good s…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 11:02 PM
0

Lol most men and women dont want women to have the reins. I sure as shit don't. Like for most hetero people the whole idea of good sex is centered around the man dictating everything. And spoiler: if she likes you, pretty much anything you do is great especially if you're into it. Acting like In n' Out is this complicated thing to do right is probably one of the worst aspects of this Xtra culture we live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:25 PM
2

Bisexual guy OP so any alleged experience with women is half larp. Everyone screens everyone else for looks at first. The people who are successful (men and women) know their lane and accept it and move the fuck on. People tend to treat people they view as on their level (think same league rather than equal) better. Anyone who uses shit like "awkward in bed" is just a performative sex tryhard. If the fundamentals of sex arent enough to get you off with someone then you're just compensating for a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:56 PM
8

Dumb slop. Women gain satisfaction from society reflecting positively on their choice of mate. Men do not care about that. Which is why men will be the overwhelming customers for AI female companionship. Women are going to be the ones who have to fight harder and harder for worse and worse men to give them attention. Because they are also going to be the ones overwhelmingly displaced by AI economically.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 05:00 PM

Yes. If you utilize your alleged literacy and type prompts into Google, you will find the answers you seek.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 11:49 PM

Women create misogynists tbh. The men who do best with women across the board in terms of relationship satisfaction and short term sex are benevolent sexists. The close runner up? Hostile sexists (misogynists). Left in the dust? Egalitarian men. Which groups of men hold the most sexist views toward women? Very attractive men Very unattractive men ^ all of the above statements are backed by research. Have some popcorn and a Google for a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 11:41 PM
4

Exactly. There's a reason that the men who are most sexist are the ones who are the least and the most attractive to women. Both are most exposed to the fact that you never can or should take anything a woman says seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 06:08 PM
1

Buddy women don't have any ability to detect interpersonal intangible qualities with their pussies. They detect social hierarchy based on their perception. Which is given by looks and wealth (or appearance of it). They believe whatever these people say because they desperately want to attach themselves to a higher rung on the social ladder. An ugly confident man won't con a woman out of shit. Only men in my life have observed who have pulled some insane cons on women/parasited off of them have a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 06:55 PM
7

Their lives should be dangerous.... What's next being anti-gang is hurting gangmembers? You buy the land you get the indians
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 06:19 PM
24

Sounds like you just lucked out and were aggressive with a woman who happened to think you were hot. You need to just figure out which women want to fuck you, then sexualize those interactions. Back in the day you could just talk to most any woman like that but these days women get extremely butthurt when a man talks to them that way AND is not attractive to them. To save yourself the headache just ensure that any woman you're spending time with wants to fuck you. Learning to do that way more RO…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 06:18 PM
6

This is also wrong. Several studies have shown women experience physiological arousal in the presence of arousing stimuli as fast as men do. I disagree with your prescription. Men should just screen for women who are actually interested in them and they won't have any problems with "needing to warm her up."
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 09:05 PM
1

They are....
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 08:06 PM
0

How would you know? Aren't you the self proclaimed slut who doesn't want commitment or a relationship? HEY EVERYONE and welcome to another episode of BLIND LEADING THE BLIND: 304 edition
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 08:05 PM

Yeah this is also cope. Men who want relationships don't want to commit to sluts. Women think they're doing men a favor by choosing them for a relationship. Unsure why. A relationship is all liabilities with less of the fun. A casual situation is all fun no liabilities. You say men who have these preferences are just "losers" who end up in bad relationships. Not really. Men who can get laid easily can find relationships easily. Men with options don't pick sluts for commitment. You can try to arg…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 04:50 AM

Trololol Grade: D-
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 03:58 AM

Because the cope is strong with this OP. Every guy with experience has met this girl. She shouts all day long how she doesn't even want a relationship and just uses men blah blah blah. And mostly it isn't true. It's just a weird social defense mechanism. Men tell women they're wrong when they STATE what they want. Because women often act opposite those desires. But hey maybe I'm wrong and she'll have the same attitude at 50 when there's still no one who wants her for more than a night.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 03:58 AM

Totally. Being a pass around girl no one sees a future with is Hella choice. U g0 gRrrl.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 03:53 AM

Yeah it is true despite you attempting to turn outlier circumstances into trends. Women and men cheat in marriages at fairly similar rates and women are the ones to break up the family with divorce. Fantasy isn't reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 12:39 AM

For one. Maybe 4 or 5 nights, sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 12:14 AM

So a woman who doesnt want a relationship and is proud of being a slut unsurprisingly has a negative take on commitment Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 11:52 PM

Lol no one wants to commit to a slut so it's more a statement of reality. Go slay, queen.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 11:31 PM

Men are drastically underestimating how little the average woman cares about being a slut (FYP) Slop tier OP
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 11:14 PM
6

Women have had dating on tutorial mode for the longest time. Any woman complaining about her dating life is complaining about her own standards. However in the future yes they will have it harder: AI overwhelmingly will displace women Male centered ideologies are very ascendant Young men trending conservative for the first time ans diverging sharply from women Artificial wombs and artificial gametes real possibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:50 PM
2

Lol by that logic the holocaust led to a great peacetime era....eventually. Slavery led to civil rights. Eventually. As Keynes said about such long run style takes: in the long run we're all dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:13 PM
2

No doubt: mob rule and anarchy followed by swiftly elevating a single individual to a position of even greater power than the previous problematic upper class ever had.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:12 PM
2

Then the future will be like the vast majority of the past. Especially if you take the whole y chromosome meme at face value (1 male reproducing for every 17 women or something like that). Most societies have been polygynous historically but even in those societies monogamy was the norm for >90% of men. That's before we even get to how accurate your technofeudal cyberpunk fever dreams really are regarding current trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:11 PM

How would "find a woman who enjoys what you do in bed" = a woman cheating? Like did you not even read what I wrote? Of course not. Lol go find yourself a good little boy who will take direction, I assure you no one cares. my policy = if I don't like it or she doesn't seem over the moon, on to the next, which is why I dont have issues. Would rather move on than "take directions." Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 04:20 AM

Dude if you have to "communicate and learn" how to get some woman off, it becomes a job at that point. If you just want to smash for a few minutes and finish there are women out there who will get off just fine from that (SHOCKER). and the same is true for any other shit you're into. The incessant need to be extra regarding sex is so lame. Sexual compatibility = do your approaches to sex work ro produce mutual satisfaction? So if you bang some chick and she has some issue or didn't cum or whatev…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 03:39 AM
1

The usual nonsensical speculation, combined with narrating yourself into having any kind of impact on someone else. Your "input" is noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 09:27 AM
4

^ yet another example of delulu cuckooland thinking. Women are just as if not more fat than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 08:54 AM
42

Slop shit post tier take. Research on swipe data, interpersonal interaction, and initial attraction has repeatedly demonstrated that women are more superficial and picky than men are. It's even been shown that when men rate women they rate on a normal bell curve whereas women rate 80% of men as below average. To be considered attractive by women rating a man has to land in the top 5-10% of attractiveness. But as usual women are completely delusional about the real world as demonstrated by OP
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 09:41 PM
1

Also men when women have dicks the same way they do: 😡😡😡
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 07:39 AM
15

Um. Youre giving the man the sex. :) So anyone you date gets to know that you'll slop the fun around and that "dating you" doesn't really mean anything beyond being further subjected to your self described "picky particular" nature. How fun. Lol and most likely that's the guy you make "wait" for it too lmfao. Clownworld.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 03:04 AM
28

Lol when women say shit like this 🤣 "I wouldnt date them...fuck them maybe.". Oh so they won't get the pleasure of the liability-gasm aka "relationship" and only the fun. You showed them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 02:47 AM
6

Ugly women don't really have that hard of a time. This is confirmed by just looking at the gini coefficients in OLD. The gini for women of all ranges of attractiveness is around the same as you'd find in a social democracy like those in western Europe. The male gini coefficient is on par with literal failed states led by warlords. Even the ugliest woman gets more attention than the most attractive men. Women feel the same thing for any man that has high status coding that normal men feel for nor…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 02:46 AM
0

MEANWHILE, AT THE LEGION OF COOM.... Lots of research available showing women alter their ratings of male attractiveness and personality based literally on how good the car he stands next to is, if he stands next to a car at all, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:41 PM

Yeah as usual you're retreating into some kind of "no true scotsman" + "my special snowflake nuanced take." Because you missed it: society. And culture. The evidence is everywhere: practices once considered taboo are tolerated and encouraged in many cases. Promiscuity, anti Natalism, alternative relationship arrangements that involve more hedonism and less marriage kids, etc. Like just spit out your own take on whatever rather than just skip and duck away from being associated with the left by i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:39 PM
0

Yeah no. You're equivocating between bluepill and feel-good words. No sale. If you intentionally want to be good at dating then you need to accept the reality of research: they don't just matter, they are the only thing that matter + random variance. Being a "good man" has nothing to do with being good at dating. Believing pussies are moral character inventories is pretty dumb. They aren't IQ tests or personality batteries either. You can't go about being good at dating if you don't know how it …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:30 PM

To equate culture wide solutions with government action i.e. leftist thinking is a huge error. Leftist social and cultural thinking has dominated for the last few generations and only made the society worse not better. How so you ask while trotting out some of that very rhetoric: toxic masculinity being applied to all male behavior, men being shamed and made fun of increasingly in media, discouraging women from settling down and having a family in favor of "career" and "finding yourself" Peer re…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:40 AM
0

There's about a generation's worth of replicated research showing that baseball card stats i.e. looks etc. ARE pretty much everything when it comes to women selecting men. Being bluepilled is being an idiot and guaranteeing that women grant you access only if you are a utility. You're "setting yourself apart" by signaling you can be easily manipulated. Have fun with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:02 AM

I'm unsure why negative experiences would push you further "left" because left rhetoric and cultural messaging has been precisely what has enabled toxic femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 09:59 AM
2

I mean most guys who are "feminists" typically aren't that attractive in my experience. So no, they give lip service to all that shit as a way to signal they will tolerate low quality women for access to them. And when I say access i don't mean casual access. I mean they will wife up 304s. Men with the type of choice you're talking about (i.e. can casually fuck women + have enough mating power to select for relationships) either 1. Aren't saying anything about this openly because what's the poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 05:23 AM
1

Yeah dude. Women just randomly have sex casually with strange men "CUZ DEY GOTTA GET DAT NUT." Let's ignore the fact that even on that level it's stupid because casual sex is the least likely type for them to get that nut. let's ignore real life and how women who do this tend to come with various dysfunctions tied to self worth. Let's all make believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 04:05 AM
-1

Yeah and I answered that point 👉 most "sluts" as such aren't engaging in woowoo magical intimate connection. They're achieving validation via sex. Nothing noble or great about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:31 PM
-2

Why do women slut shame far more than men then? You're also assuming women who sleep around are "connecting" with anything other than their desire to be validated i.e. utilizing human dildos.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 04:24 PM

Yeah a lot of them are. Checklist: Is rude/a bitch but think she's "off the cuff" "loves banter" "fluent in sarcasm" Brags about shit that would only make sense to brag about if you were a man i.e. no one cares about how awesome you are at seduction or slutting around, the vagina makes it a cinch. Is bisexual. Thinks they are wild for doing trashy shit tier things that are also the corporate version of doing trashy shit tier things i.e. "zomg im so wild I go to strip clubs" etc. I guess Freud wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 03:52 AM

Men are more eager mainly because men suffer from the same problem women do: punching above their weight. An average dude who wants to get laid we endlessly just needs to target 2s and 3s mostly and he'll be fine. But average dudes don't want that. They want 5+ women. Then they bitch and moan and wonder what's wrong. While it does suck that women are superficial and even encouraged to be so now by culture, men refuse to acknowledge that reality and so just spend endless time jerking off about ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 07:50 PM
1

Considering that overweight/obese women are mostly in relationships and women who 30 years ago would have been considered ugly are now held up as "hawt," I'd say you're underestimating culture's impact. By a lot. People are stupid. You are stupid. We all are stupid. Try as anyone might, your culture's opinion on what you should fuck has a huge say in who you want to fuck. Look at the dude they cast to play Jimmy Olsen in the new superman movie: this would be the nerd in 80s movies. He's portraye…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 07:40 PM
1

Nah. The issue here is that in the past the women men had to choose from likely was attracted to him legitimately for many cultural reasons i.e. lower promiscuity, less degeneracy promoted/accessible, less access to men beyond their league. The tier of woman that feels that way toward the average guy has noticeably dropped. So average men have to get that same dynamic from a markedly below average woman. While women can punch up they can only punch up so far. In short: hoeflation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 07:34 PM
2

Ive never witness a man overcorrect to feminism. Not once. Ive seen many men like myself start their youth more progressive minded only to ditch that shit pretty fast once they had actual experience with women. Ive seen many men just retreat into reality denial out of social cowardice i.e. maintaining whatever beliefs they started out with. The culture by default tries its hardest to brainwash the young men into being feminists/progressive. It was bad when I was younger and I'm almost 40. Can't …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:39 PM
3

They are very good at picking....what they are told to pick. They're not good at picking intangible qualities like "good character." Historically everyone knew women made slop decisions regarding who to fuck and pair off with, which is why marriages were arranged or family groups/the father heavily vetted and curated the suitors. Even before the 60s a woman's social circle still served the vetting function (less efficacy now because so many female social circles celebrate the wrong qualities). A…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:34 PM
-1

Women aren't anything pilled. OP doesn't understand the logical conclusion of its correct outlook about women. Women just adhere to groupthink. Which means they aren't independent thinkers. Which means what they think = who's in charge of whatever group they identify with + present company. Which means trying to argue or reason with them whether they end up agreeing or disagreeing is a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 03:56 PM
4

All these debates about personality are such unfathomable jive. Key dead horses: BE KIND NOT A PUSHOVER LOL (arbitrary bullshit standard) U SHUD NEVAR BE NICE 2 WOMEN CUZ DEN DEY HATE U IM A GIRL N I LIKE NICE GUYS TEEHEE etc. All of these takes are pretty stupid. Why? Nice behavior/ick behavior whatever = judgment totally dependent on if the chick digs you. People have a hard time accepting the truth for whatever reason. Hint: women literally stay with men who regularly beat the shit out of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 03:53 PM
0

Except in every context where these literal decisions have been studied, it has repeatedly been shown that it's the only thing about YOU that matters. (a larger part is just random variance; personality repeatedly shown to have 0 effect). Its not ironic to point out a non-psychiatric professional randomly diagnosing "autism" or "autistic" anything they disagree with is just mental health shaming as a way of coping with their inability to cogently meet the point. I'm just observing typical r tard…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 03:46 PM
1

Mental health shaming ad hom? Check. No response to/ignorance of a mountain of peer reviewed research on topic? Check. Completely ignorant of research contravening lame tinder anecdote about female swiping behavior? Check. Reliance on vague woowoo bullshit that basically = just go be a jester to women? Check. This is an extreme r tard way of looking or rather not looking at things.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 02:21 PM
1

Yeah there's peer reviewed research on that as well. For your "personality" to have an effect the timescale we are talking is on the order of MONTHS. So yeah if you wanna have fun hanging around a chick jestering for her be my guest. Like think about what you're saying regarding the "hot" guy. Do you really think you have some magical pussy personality test? No. You just have whether you're attracted to a man or not and your projections and ideas about him. Usually when women say shit like that …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:46 AM
2

"We aimed to assess whether verbal, numerical, and spatial intelligence, creativity, and intra- and interpersonal emotional competence are associated with higher real-life mate appeal. In speed dates, 87 women and 88 men met up to 14 members of the opposite sex (2188 observations). While only one measured ability—women’s creativity—was significantly associated with mate appeal, ability perceptions by speed-dating partners could broadly predict mate appeal. Effects of perceived and measured abili…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:44 AM
1

You don't have to work hard at all if you take to heart the advice bub. Because you will start selecting women who select you and stop trying to "win over" anyone else. Dude this isn't a debate. There's piles of research about it. My life experience confirms it. So do many many other men with far more experience than you obviously (don't) have. Why would I give up on dating? That assumes feminine woowoo nonsense like "likes me for me" computes or matters. It doesn't. What matters is finding some…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 08:40 AM
1

Why would I want to be with one for what purpose? No my belief is based on my lived experience and countless peer reviewed papers showing the predominance of physical attraction (and variance; 0 personality) in female dating decisions. Lol why would this be bad news. It's only bad news if you're desperately seeking validation of your intangible qualities or character from some woman. If you know what women respond to you'll never take anything they say personally again. The average man should li…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 07:20 AM
2

Wtf are you talking about. I'm talking about dozens of peer reviewed studies in academic journals on the matter of initial attraction. None of the studies is a survey they're all of people making real decisions. It's so cute when people talk out of their ass and pretend shit isn't spewing out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 07:12 AM
1

Yeah because peer reviewed research isn't reality. Lmfao. Oh the chick on tinder you haven't even met or bedded told u sum thingz? Lol N00b tier.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 06:22 AM
3

Yeah sure boyo my life experience triple digits and peer reviewed research in line with is all just made up and lives online. Physical attractiveness matters. Personality in the short term does NOT matter. (Long term behavior only starts having an effect over like months: peer reviewed research supporting this too). Holy shit wow your personal anecdote about your subjective opinion of you vs some tinder thot's attractiveness just busts everything up. Lol and who brags about talking to someone on…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:52 AM
5

As someone with more actual experience with women than probably every man on this board, more experience talking to strangers, etc. I will tell you this...look at your post You are approaching women non stop. Your success rate is not over 2% regarding conversions to lays. Why? Because I've done it and gotten good at it. Spoiler alert it works best when you LOOK GOOD. And even then it doesn't work particularly well. Paul Janka cold approached in the late 2000s. Before tinder so before women got b…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:31 AM
4

You seem allergic to a ton of peer reviewed research demonstrating that physical attraction is the single greatest predictor of a woman liking a man after meeting, that personality has repeatedly been shown to demonstrate 0 effect, and that random variance explains the rest. Even when ranking their suitors on intangible qualities those qualities measured objectively failed to meaningfully explain those perceptions. Guess what did? Physical attractiveness :) So no, a woman's attraction to a man i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:23 AM
2

Wrong. For men this dating advice will get you everywhere: Focus on YOUR BASEBALL CARD STATS. NOTHING ELSE MATTERS STATS: Race Looks Height Body Status Wealth Personality does not meaningfully exist to women. Their opinions of you are them reacting to how they feel about you superficially. This is why listening to women there's an epidemic of 200 IQ NARCY GENIUS MANIPULATORS running amok. The reality? They follow feefees when dealing men they are attracted to and ignore obvious bullshit because …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:07 AM
2

Stop trying to equate this as if men and women are the same. I'd say men are cool to have kids until 50 or 60 and women 30 or 40. The increased :risks: are 1 wildly different between women and men and 2 in the age brackets I mentioned very overhyped even for women, the absolute odds are still low Also, you toss out "more money" like it's the same as anything else. It isn't. More money is HUGE. IMO to the point of all but erasing almost every negative you point out.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 06:41 PM
1

No women or people are demisexual. Much like sapiosexual its just made up bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:12 PM
0

This is galaxy tier feminist propaganda. This is how they handwave away how shitty modern life has become for women on every objective indicator. Women are objectively less happy less mentally well less satisfied in their relationships since before 1. They could even get credit cards and 2. Before marital rape was actual recognized as rape and illegal. What does that tell you? The shriek response is always "BUT BACK DEN NO WOMYN WAS EVER HAPPY EVER DEY HAD 2 PICK ANY MAN 2 SURVIVEZ!!!" Its compl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 08:34 AM
1

Let's assume you're flaunting the money i.e. conspicuous consumption. Then you need to understand it works the same way as any other status marker, like physical attractiveness or just raw social status (excellence in a field, athlete, movie star etc.) When you are above the woman it goes like gangbusters. If shes middle class and you're butt ass rich = panty peeler. If shes poor and you're upper middle class = same. If you're hot and shes mid = panty peeler. If you're the apex of the social sce…
/r/seduction06/07/25 05:18 AM

This is bogus. Most women are superficial. They are largely attracted to the same things. Men are too but can do "with less" much easier and happier than women can. People really like to believe they can detect anything about another person beyond their own perception of them. Psychological closeness = MY IDEA THAT THEY ARE LIKE ME = largely halo effect. All these "do the internal work" "therapy" posts are always peak r tard. Don't believe me? Anyone who has experienced a huge glow up will tell …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:13 AM

^ proof positive of delusional women who believe their pussy truly is an IQ test/personality battery/moral character inventory, etc. Bingo checkmark: bisexual woman ----> narcy
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:16 AM

^ peak delusion. This chick isn't some kind of model and is saying less than like 1 in 100 men are "good enough" for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:10 AM
1

Difference between her idea of you from pic and reality. 90% of the time she rejects you it is for a superficial reason
/r/seduction06/07/25 03:41 AM
5

No we aren't. I love how people on reddit love talking straight out of their asses.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:30 AM
1

ya rly Women get wet from power i.e. status. For most brokies the only way to trigger that is physical culturally conditioned cues (certain phenotypes). Do you think the ugly ass rappers who are running thru women left and right aren't actually making them wet? Ugly rock stars from olden days? Just a bunch of non wet groupies getting fucked? Like accept reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 10:42 PM
17

All people who criticize men for any reason as being "insecure" are operating on a cultural narrative that is dying fast: the assumption that men give a shit about being labeled insecure. The shaming language is no longer working. The insult itself is nonsensical. Insecurity isn't some bad thing per se. If you're not an idiot you're pretty insecure about your ability to fly off a bridge. If you're not an idiot you should be insecure about holding mainstream cultural beliefs when dealing with wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 04:04 PM
2

^ Yet another exhibit example of slut behavior. Projection. Constantly is lying (anything for attention) and so accuses others of lying. Just avoid engaging with this chaotic city bicycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 03:23 PM
1

As I just said, if one is making use of government/social services then mostly it's the top income earners. And all you said is "contribute to society" in different language.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 03:21 PM
5

No one needs to be upset to call you a reality denying r tard. That's you pretending to have an impact.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:26 AM
5

Yeah me and all the peer reviewed research documenting the trends. We must all be lying because your feefees say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:20 AM
8

Both the male and societal loneliness epidemic and mental health crises are real. I'm the guy who isn't an r tard. You must be the other guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:06 AM
7

Don't confuse non sequitur insults like an r tard with responding to listed facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 05:43 AM
1

No. Women aren't stupid. They're gaslighting. They do it on purpose to confuse everything when a good point is made.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:57 PM
1

Buddy, the top percentiles of earners pay the vast majority of taxes anyway. The bottom 50% of income earners pay about 2-3% of the tax revenue. The NEETs are on to something. Especially the men. Why work and contribute to a society that marginalizes you anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:56 PM
1

Be attractive is vague advice. What that means is dependent on context. Initially: Do whatever you can to....be taller, look better, have muscles, have money. Those are all that matter. Long term: This is where behavior starts to matter. But again not the common bullshit. Here's what matters: do you behave in a way that leads to her believing she is your equal or better? Congratulations and welcome to less sex less respect and a general headache. Are verbal abuse, PUA tactics, etc. the way to co…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 08:27 PM
2

Trick question. I don't want marriage. Anyone who does in 2025 is an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 05:55 PM
0

This logic even if true is trivial. Why? Attractiveness isn't some magical objective quality. Culture has a lot to do with it. For example if women are hypergamous and attracted to markers (superficial) of a status difference between her and the man, then cultural messaging that devalues the average man and elevates the average women will result in average women finding average men unattractive. So in that scenario what you're saying is true but it's also meaningless because the issue for the un…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 05:49 PM
7

It's so easy to date thst people are having less sex and the fertility rate is in a crator. Peak critical thinking in this OP
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 05:43 PM
5

Bingo checkmark: wants masculine credit for access granted via vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 05:20 PM
6

Because she's a self described slut which means that she gets through life by acting stupid and gaslighting people :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:33 PM
2

How many dumbasses are going to show up and attempt to switch the context of the conversation from a general societal trend to some made up personal issue as an indirect as hominem?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:30 PM
2

What kind of an r tard are you that you dont even grasp the basic context of the discussion as macro rather than micro. Grow a brain dude. Its ridiculous. Nobody is keeping you from reading what you read....except you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:28 PM
0

Yup. For example pretty much every time someone makes a generalization, a woman will chime in to argue exceptions exist....as if that invalidates the rule. It's pretty hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:26 PM
0

Man i guess no man in any male space invaded by women ever tried that before. PS lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:47 AM

Yeah because no one ever tried that. Lol what an r tard.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:31 AM
3

Men do that. Then women bitch about being left out and invade the space. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:30 AM
1

I can see why you gif. Reading is hard. We can resume discussion when you're able to cogently engage with my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 02:53 AM
1

Then you apparently don't know how to read what you read. How unsurprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 02:49 AM
1

Yeah so fantastical that you couldn't respond to facts I mentioned and instead defaulted to "HERR DURR U STOOPID" posturing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 02:36 AM
5

Sorry my civil discussion made you cry. It's to be expected when I deal with arghtards.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:43 AM
6

To say shit like this when the founders of the US literally engaged in the 18th century equivalent of anon posting online to pass the constitution just reveals a huge amount of ignorance on your part. Yes. I believe that definitely a lot of the people expressing frustration with today's gynocentric climate are men who are the ones who contribute positively to society in that way. Like there's millions of men doing it. Its not 2005 when it was just fringe boards talking. The manosphere and adjace…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:39 AM
1

You can't really reply because you can barely read let alone comprehend. Like lol I haven't watched porn in 20 years. Unfortunately for you, all my thoughts on women come from having dealt with them up close and personal for a long time. And a lot of them. The results are in. And they're....well, what i said.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:36 AM
-1

As a man who's been loved and laid to the point of statistical outlier I will tell you this: The Bible has it right about women. And men. But definitely women. The blackpill has it like 60% right but is way too biologically deterministic. Women don't like things because muh genes. They like what they are told to like by society and their peer group. That's it. That's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:34 AM
8

Lol slop. Women live life on TUTORIAL mode. Which is why the vast majority of people displaced by AI will be women, who make the majority of those who work in soft skilled "get paid to socialize or do menial task" jobs. Women CANT support themselves by and large. Further, the current status of women in society is ON THE BACK OF MEN. Affirmative action benefitted white women the most: funded by tax payers. Only MEN are net positive tax burdens over their lifetimes. Not women. What happens when yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:31 AM
1

Slop. Women are superficial. They like men based on superficial reasons. Therefore they will bend over backwards to make excuses for men they like. Just because women eagerly believe stupid bullshit because "he's totes my type" != women being able to even perceive what a good wordsmith is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:27 AM

Yeah so this strategy is working so well that: Women are less happy than ever Marriage is dying More women will be single and childless than ever before soon Female mental health is collapsing. Joke OP
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 07:09 PM
14

What basic social behavior will women bitch about as emotional labor next? The real emotional labor = listening to women complain about nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:11 PM
2

This is so stupid. No. You stop yourself from being with hot women because you instinctively realize her value is higher than yours. The solution is either to increase your social power in HARD CONCRETE ways or stop embarrassing yourself or prepared to be rejected 99.9999% of the time
/r/seduction03/07/25 03:44 PM
3

Yes. Because the lesson is: NEVER EVER show weakness as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 02:19 AM
2

No it doesn't. It screens out men women are attracted to and screens in men with fewer options i.e. men they are less or not attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 02:15 AM
1

What a stupid post. Yes let's ignore that culture is shaped by social forces. Let's ignore that culture shapes who is desired and who is not. Let's pretend that phenotype exposure and framing has no effect on love and attraction. Let's also pretend that in the present campaigns have been launched that have altered the perception of attractiveness (females mostly, alternative types). Yes when you pretend the world doesnt exist you can say all sorts of misinformed things. Golly gee.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter