TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GryphonFeathers Archive

View 14 posts and 120 comments by GryphonFeathers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
339

Social IssuesGryphonFeathers/r/MensRights18/02/18 11:22 PM
128

Marriage/ChildrenGryphonFeathers/r/MensRights29/08/17 05:34 PM
47

False AccusationGryphonFeathers/r/MensRights10/08/16 12:00 PM
16

Activism/SupportGryphonFeathers/r/MensRights22/09/16 10:39 PM
12

GryphonFeathers/r/MensRights26/09/16 10:27 PM
11

False AccusationGryphonFeathers/r/MensRights07/10/16 09:29 PM
7

False AccusationGryphonFeathers/r/MensRights15/11/17 12:43 AM
7

False AccusationGryphonFeathers/r/MensRights08/09/17 08:17 PM
4

Removed for: Not PPD.GryphonFeathers/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/17 01:13 PM
3

GryphonFeathers/r/MensRights02/10/16 12:41 AM
0

GryphonFeathers/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:13 PM
0

Social IssuesGryphonFeathers/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:48 PM
0

GryphonFeathers/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:12 AM
0

Social IssuesGryphonFeathers/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:50 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Links? I had no idea there were so many such sites.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:22 AM
1

You're right. We should just take his word for it.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 10:13 PM
3

Words are cheap. Judge a man by his actions, not his words.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 09:57 PM
6

It makes him a hypocrite. The man spent $85k to take out full-page advertisements in four different newspapers, calling for the death penalty to be reinstated for the Central Park Five, over a year before they went to trial. Fifteen years after they were exonerated, he says they're still guilty. These are not the actions of a man who believes in due process.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:23 PM
2

He said he believes in "due process". Only when it benefits him. Where was this advocacy for due process when he declared the Central Park Five to be guilty in 2016, years after they were exonerated?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:08 PM
6

Trump is not our ally when it comes to this. Just look up what he had to say about the Central Park Five in 2016, years after they were exonerated.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 06:00 PM
1

Sounds like the yogurt marketed to men, only more unhealthy.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 06:59 PM
0

Yeah, I'm going to call bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 08:16 PM
6

It's possible that he could be your half brother, but nothing you described would necessarily indicate that. The idea that children always look like a blending of their parents is antiquated nonsense. Sometimes the child looks like neither parent because traits can skip a generation, for example when the mother is a carrier for a recessive trait. And those neat little 2x2 Punnett squares get a lot more complicated when you're dealing with traits that aren't sex-linked, and that are determined by…
/r/MensRights23/12/17 09:59 PM
0

Republican senators got together to discuss ousting Moore if he got elected. But not immediately, and that's a crucial distinction here. This woman dropped out sooner than it took a minority of sitting Republicans senators to so much as condemn Moore, let alone get to the point where they felt the need to discuss how to get rid of him. Had she stubbornly stayed in the race that long, only then could you fairly criticize Democrats for not resorting to more drastic measures.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:45 AM
-1

She is quoted in some of those articles as saying, "For me, that means a vindictive, terminated employee's false allegations are enough for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) to decide not to support our promising campaign." Whereas, both the RNC and Trump supported Moore.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 12:45 AM
1

I would say that a robber can pay back what they stole. A rapist can't. And as I've already said, I don't believe that castration is the ideal solution either.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 07:06 PM
9

Yeah, it's a tough ethical dilemma, for sure. I don't think castration is the ideal solution, but I also don't think it's fair to society to let a serial rapist go as long as they pinkie swear to never do that again. Their reintegration into society should be conditional in some way, if allowed at all.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 04:31 AM
21

When someone's on their second rape conviction, odds are it's only a matter of time before there's a third victim. It's hard to say what should be done in those cases.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 03:27 AM
0

Child support is not calculated according to the child's needs, but according to the non-custodial parent's income. This makes sense if, and only if, the child will continue living within close proximity of the non-custodial parent. I do think it's fair to ensure that the child can continue going to the same school, and that's going to be more expensive for a child growing up in the Bay Area than a child in Appalachia. That said, if the custodial parent wants to uproot the child and move across …
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:54 PM
3

Throwaway account. Don't you mean accounts?
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:32 PM
2

Just joined today, and this is your first comment ever, eh? Nice try, OP.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 10:24 PM
4

colloquially Which is absolutely worthless in the context of a medical definition, which is what matters from the legal standpoint. Remember how you made a point of how technically Turner isn't a rapist because what he did isn't classified as rape in that state? You said: "I think a person is technically a rapist if he/she meets the state's technical definition of rape. I don't think my opinion about rape, nor anyone else's is relevant." Likewise, your opinion about what it means to be unconscio…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 07:05 PM
6

In our language and culture My point was that in our common vernacular Which is absolutely worthless in the context of a medical definition, which is what matters from the legal standpoint. Remember how you made a point of how technically Turner isn't a rapist because what he did isn't classified as rape in that state? You said: "I think a person is technically a rapist if he/she meets the state's technical definition of rape. I don't think my opinion about rape, nor anyone else's is relevant." …
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:27 PM
16

You brought up their different BACs because you want people to assume he was more drunk than she was at the time of the incident. Otherwise you would have no problem with clarifying in the OP what time these BACs were recorded.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:16 PM
8

You stated, and I quote, "She was never unconscious." He plainly stated that she never regained consciousness at the scene, during the ambulance transport, or at the hospital at 4:15 AM. Nowhere does he state that she was mostly unconscious, or only a little bit unconscious. As opposed to your wholly unsupported original claim that she was never unconscious at all.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 06:14 PM
6

Page 6: Deputy Jeff Taylor testified that Jane Doe never regained consciousness at the scene, remained unconscious throughout the entire ambulance transport, and remained unconscious at the hospital until 4:15 AM. Can you explain why you seized on his comment that he heard her snore, and chose to ignore everything else he had to say after that? Can you explain what makes you think you're more qualified to assess her state of consciousness than him?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:54 PM
10

Great, thank you for providing a source. Your source also states this right after the relevant paragraph: Doe did not regain consciousness until around 4:15 a.m. in the hospital, at which point Taylor told her that there was "a chance that she may have been sexually assaulted." Was Deputy Jeff Taylor mistaken in that regard? I think a person is technically a rapist if he/she meets the state's technical definition of rape. I don't think my opinion about rape, nor anyone else's is relevant. So you…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:36 PM
9

I saw that you linked the court documents to someone else, thank you. http://documents.latimes.com/people-v-brock-allen-turner-59/ No, the paramedics did not state that during the trial. Nowhere in these court documents do the words 'snoring' or 'snore' ever appear. Maybe you read that somewhere else, but it wasn't from the court documents. What he was convicted of in the state of California was not rape. Sure, this may be a technicality, but his crime he was charged with was touching her genita…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:56 PM
2

If this is Brock's "truth" he should still be in prison. He also claimed that she orgasmed after only a minute of finger blasting her. Yeah sure, bud.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:18 AM
17

Oops the numbers are wrong. I'll fix those. Are you going to fix the part where you claimed his BAC was higher than hers? She was 3X the legal limit, he was 2X. You raise a lot of good points, but it's important you get easily verifiable details like that right.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:40 AM
16

3x the legal limit is on the verge of death. That's what the accuser's was, actually. It's stated in the court docs that her BAC was between .242 and .249. I don't know where OP read that Turner's BAC was higher. His was .17.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:28 AM
8

Can you cite the page numbers where you found this information? I read the court docs as well, and don't recall the part about her snoring or pretending to be asleep. EDIT: Had the completely wrong BAC. I think you also completely mixed up their BACs. Turner's was .17, and Doe's was .24. He did NOT rape her. His penis was in his pants and his pants never came off. This was confirmed by DNA evidence and he was not charged with rape. By definition, he is not a rapist. What he was convicted of is a…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:26 AM
1

Because I think this would be taken a little more seriously if he had been caught recording little girls.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 09:10 PM
2

News stories about male students being sexually victimized by teachers are posted to this subreddit every single day, including multiple posted today. Why are you singling out this one? These boys matter just as much.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:29 PM
1

You don't think this case would be taken a little more seriously if he had been recording little girls instead? Male victims of sexual crimes just aren't taken seriously, whether the culprit is male or female.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:13 PM
1

Why is this being downvoted?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:06 PM
2

Because this teacher recorded boys in the bathroom and got away with a mere "voyeurism" charge, which is complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:05 PM
1

We have teenagers being charged with child pornography for taking naked selfies, and "voyeurism" is all this teacher gets charged with for recording boys in the bathroom?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:02 PM
39

‘Cross your legs’, ‘be more ladylike’ I don't see any of them heeding that advice, so why should I?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:14 PM
5

So in other words boys have HIGHER reading comprehension. It's a possibility, but you can't conclude that from the information OP has provided so far. More information is needed. We'll need to wait and see if he can find the source.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:12 AM
1

How's your relationship with your son? Did you ever tell him the truth?
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:56 PM
6

The child had separated retinas or some shit in his eyes. The prosecutor made a case that the boy’s head was slammed in a door. The parents said that the boy rolled off the bed and onto the floor. Do you mean exudative retinal detachment? In someone that young, you have to hit your head damn hard to cause that. I'm not saying that your buddy did it, but it is unlikely that rolling off a bed did that. Maybe the parents just didn't see what really happened.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:32 PM
3

Along with the rise of parental involvement came helicopter parenting, after all Too much of a good thing is pretty much always bad for you. Food, water, exercise, sex, you name it.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:15 PM
0

No, I do not believe that all men are one divorce rape away from burning their children alive.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:41 PM
7

Have you considered the possibility that maybe there's a reason a father who would burn his children alive didn't have custody?
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:05 PM
0

Feminists are the ones who declared "emotional abuse" to be a form of domestic violence. That being the case, we have the right to defend ourselves from it.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 05:42 PM
1

It's a perfectly valid question.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 04:53 PM
2

That the figure for women being killed by ex-partners is only one every three days is a testament to male discipline and forbearance. Amen.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 04:52 PM
1

The divorce rate for first marriages has been declining since the 80s. It's only when you account for serial divorcees that you get the 1-in-2 marriages ending in divorce statistic.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:44 PM
1

Not true in my case, also anecdotal. My wife is the coupon-clipping penny-pincher in the family, and I don't personally know any men who go to the trouble of clipping coupons and shopping around for the best deals. But not when it came to Christmas for our kid. If our kid asked for an Xbox from Santa, we would rather make sure he got that damn Xbox than risk losing it to another buyer over a measly $30. Just pointing out that around this time of year, I'm even more doubtful that the woman was bu…
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:54 PM
2

Threatening to use a knife to prevent further escalation is Never use a weapon to threaten. You cannot effectively argue in court that you truly feared for your life if you drew your weapon but didn't feel the need to use it. In my state, you have to take a class before you can obtain your concealed carry permit. That's what our instructor taught us.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:29 PM
3

"They are all he said, she said, and that is exactly what they count on, because people almost always believe a woman over a man." I don't think genders are irrelevant to their argument.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 07:59 PM
2

They are all he said, she said, and that is exactly what they count on, because people almost always believe a woman over a man. Wasn't Kevin Spacey accused by men, starting with Anthony Rapp?
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:41 PM
4

It's because conservative politicians need the pro-life vote, and pro-life voters tend to be religious tradcons who won't support a measure that would result in an increased financial incentive to abort. Now if we could get elective abortions outlawed, then we could seriously discuss this without alienating a core part of the Republican base who, like them or not, we ultimately need to further our goals. I probably don't need to go into why trying to appeal this idea to liberal voters is a lost …
/r/MensRights11/11/17 04:08 PM
1

and then compare their person definition to the legal definition. How does your personal definition of rape and sexual assault compare to the various legal definitions? For example, what Brock Turner was convicted of happened to not be legally defined as rape in his state of California, but it is legally defined as rape by the federal government as well as the vast majority of states.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 01:06 PM
0

Maybe we could also stop flairing every single post about a rape accusation as false accusations by default. Even posts about Brock Turner and Daniel Holtzclaw, after they were convicted, were flaired 'false accusation.'
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:28 PM
0

They believe in equality, and that some are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 05:39 PM
9

This is technically true. Not enough evidence to prove the accused is guilty isn't evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the accusation was false.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 05:38 PM
3

Sexual assault and rape can be worse than other forms of assault because the lasting trauma can make it more difficult for the victim to have healthy sexual relationships. As a species that reproduces sexually, most of us would find that to be a pretty big deal. Ask any man who's experienced erectile dysfunction, and he'll probably describe it as devastating, for one. I don't see a physical inability to enjoy sex any differently than a mental inability, and rape can cause both. (See, vaginismus)…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:21 PM
3

And why don't you take a second and consider, what are your personal reasons for believing that sex is so evil that all these special protections are needed? I get that you have been indoctrinated to just believe that sex is some special kind of bad for people, but take a second and see if you really do believe that, and if so, why? Wait, are you seriously asking what's so bad about rape?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:49 AM
1

If the genders were reversed, sure. But as the victim is a woman, I doubt any mercy would be shown to the boy, no matter what his age is.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:10 AM
11

Incorrect. It's a common misconception that all sex between an adult and an underage minor is automatically statutory rape. This would be a clear case of rape by coercion, and he would be the rapist, no differently than if he had used physical force.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 11:28 PM
2

The worst issue for lesbians is not being 'recognized' in legal/social settings. I don't quite get the logic behind 'rape the gay away,' but both gays and lesbians are often subjected to 'corrective' rape in some parts of the world, usually by family members or friends of the family.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 06:00 PM
6

The car insurance analogy really doesn't work out. Men don't pay $80-100 more a month for car insurance. Unless used as a treatment for a health condition, its not "necessary healthcare." As you've said you think it should be covered when it's medically necessary, does that mean you're against the current implementation of the mandate-repeal?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:54 PM
10

Why should her medication be treated any differently than mine?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 08:43 PM
8

In that case, it would be an example of medication for a health issue, so falls under necessary care. That should be free, I support free health for necessary treatments. That wasn't the case before the ACA, at least not with our provider. While we could afford it, I know not all families can afford to drop $75 a month even for an essential medication. So I agree. Her medication shouldn't be treated any differently than mine, but from the look of things, it's about to be once again.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 08:41 PM
20

But when you consider that birth control costs as little as $15 a month at walmart, you have to take the whole thing into perspective. My wife's birth control costs $75 a month for the generic version, which she takes for ovarian cysts. Just wanted to offer my perspective.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 08:28 PM
1

Do you have a source for this? I'd like to use it for future reference.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:30 PM
4

It's a net gain for society as a whole to incentivize young couples with good, steady jobs to have kids. These are the couples more likely to raise their children to be successful adults, moreso than children born in trailer parks and the projects. This benefits everyone, including you.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 05:51 PM
1

Am I the only one who can't take "news" articles about Reddit posts or tweets seriously?
/r/MensRights05/10/17 05:29 PM
2

The law should still reflect that stealing is wrong as a general principle, and any exception should be common sense and workable in general principle, don't you think? Maybe that would be nice, but that's not how the law works in our country. A judge does not have the authority to rule on common sense, only on written law. A judge cannot say, "Well, the law doesn't explicitly grant for exceptions in this case, but common sense says it obviously should." A doctor who performed a procedure presen…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:40 PM
2

I think it should be a hard line across the board regardless of reason. I used to think the same, but a routine ultrasound is scheduled at around 20 weeks to check for malformations, some of which simply cannot be detected until the fetus is that developed. Sometimes pregnancies that are terminated at 20 weeks or later were very much wanted.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:19 PM
3

But it does kind of raise another question: If a woman experiences rape and wants to have an abortion, why not abort early on? What about a girl who's still a child herself? There was a case recently in Alabama where a 12-year-old girl who had been raped by a family member had to petition the court to obtain an abortion without parental consent, and then some pro-life district attorney kept appealing. In recent years, there have been cases in other countries where raped girls younger than her, w…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 06:12 PM
3

Cop approaches , you cooperate. End of story. What if the cop orders you to do something illegal, and obeying can cause you to lose your nursing license, as well as open you and your hospital up to lawsuits?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:42 PM
0

It's not helpful It's a biological fact. If they admit they couldn't tell the difference between sex with a condom and without, then they admit that the guy was throwing a hot dog down a hallway.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:18 AM
-6

So their admitting that their cunts are so loose that they can't even feel the difference.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:48 PM
7

Ask her how much she thinks it will cost to get. A female valedictorian? It won't cost her a penny. She'll be bombarded with so many scholarships and grants that she'll get a refund check every semester. That's female privilege for you.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 12:56 AM
7

The right way to raise awareness for the male victims isn't to delegitimize the female victims. I don't know about you, but I've never accidentally kidnapped hundreds of girls and sold them to be brides/sex slaves. That's a bit more than an oopsie.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 04:56 PM
4

Is it true the DJ destroyed a lot of evidence in this case? Why would he do that when he said the evidence was in his favor? Very strange case.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 12:33 PM
2

Great find. What percentage of sexually trafficked girls are bought by women as well?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 03:34 PM
2

Fourth, why would a man smart enough to have achieved such success, risk it all for a few seconds with a woman so ugly? I would get rid of this point. Successful men have turned out to be rapists. Elderly women have been raped. The "she's too ugly/he doesn't need to rape" defense is easily countered by reality time and time again.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:32 PM
-4

Yes, they objectively do. Exceptions to the rule do not disprove this. http://www.returnofkings.com/87139/4-reasons-why-women-cannot-and-should-not-lead http://www.returnofkings.com/59170/bad-things-happen-when-women-lead-and-men-follow http://www.returnofkings.com/17995/dont-work-for-a-female-boss http://www.returnofkings.com/61336/most-female-leaders-are-only-successful-because-of-their-male-relatives
/r/MensRights29/05/17 12:52 AM
-2

Imagine how she terrorized him!
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:22 PM
4

at no fault of her own She bears some responsibility. If she's a woman worthy of her husband's loyalty, he would never even feel the desire to cheat. Is it wrong for him to act on those urges, sure. However, it's also wrong for her to neglect her duty in keeping him satisfied. She's no victim.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:08 PM
–

While it is usually futile to ascribe logical rationale to a woman’s actions, one can make a few observations. https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/03/25/most-drug-cases-handled-former-state-chemist-annie-dookhan-have-been-vacated-case-nears-end/yfa6MU9P8HLdA3irE4tgnM/story.html Here's a local source, without the sexist garbage that makes our movement look sexist by association.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:03 AM
1

What's actually wrong with it? This will be helpful in shutting down feminazi's trying to use this crap, thank you.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 11:37 PM
1

That makes more sense. I've seen feminists try to take credit for this with Roe v Wade. Apparently they want us to believe that their such shitty mothers that we have to let them kill their babies or they'll unleash their army of lil' thugs on us all.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 11:36 PM
1

the overall rate of intimate partner violence in the United States declined by 64% from 1994-2010, declining by more than 60% for both males and females That's a huge decline. What could have caused that?
/r/MensRights02/04/17 11:21 PM
3

If your significant other, no matter the gender, withholds affection that they typically show (including sex) because you did not or will not do what they want, they are being manipulative and emotionally abusive. Another reason to distance ourselves from TRP, who encourage doing so.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 09:29 PM
–

Type 1 is the most common one used throughout Egypt Do you have a source for that? This states that Type II is more common in Egypt. Basically, if it doesn't remove the clit - I'd have chosen not to call it FGM. That would undoubtedly reduce the number of FGM in the statistics, but at least then we'd have correct information when looking at what is actually done. Type Ia is the most analogous to the most common form of MGM, as the foreskin is composed of the very same tissue that comprises the c…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 04:13 PM
–

http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/86/4/07-042093/en/ The most common forms of FGC still widely practised throughout Egypt are type I (commonly referred to as clitoridectomy) and type II (commonly referred to as excision). Also, type 1a is rarely performed alone in FGM. Type 1b is more common, which is the complete or partial removal of the clitoral glans and clitoral hood.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 03:30 PM
–

And if pin pricks are indeed considered FGM, then why isn't circumcision considered MGM? It is considered to be MGM. Also, any thoughts about the Egypt thing? Do you consider what they do in Egypt as FGM? Types I and II are performed in Egypt. Is there an ongoing debate on whether or not those qualify as FGM?
/r/MensRights08/10/16 03:16 PM
–

Read what type IV FGM is. Have you actually done so? Type IV is a catch-all category for miscellaneous practices that are too rare to warrant their own category, including not only the symbolic pinprick, but also clitoral cauterization. Therefore, we cannot dismiss the entirety of Type IV as harmless, nor can we misrepresent it as commonly practiced in terms of FGM.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:58 PM
6

Read the article. Oh, you can't, since the OP linked to a picture of the article instead.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:49 PM
2

Guess I don't know the full story. Probably because the OP linked to a screencap of the title of the article instead of the article itself.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:35 PM
–

I think a better question would be what's going to be done to make those careers safer. The way you phrase it will just be interpreted as you wanting women to get killed.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 02:13 AM
–

That's like saying if we only had women's olympics this year, women would have earned more in sports than men in the US... so they should be paid the same as men every year. No, it's not. I never said they should earn more than their male peers every year. But for the year of 2015, they were entitled to earn more than men for that given year. Using the World Cup to dismiss the fact that women's soccer generated more revenue that year as justification for why they weren't paid more? That is just …
/r/MensRights26/09/16 10:12 PM
–

Fair enough, but what I said is true for the US in 2015.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 06:04 PM
–

Women's soccer actually did bring in more revenue than men's soccer last year.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 05:23 PM
2

Also if a pregnant woman gets murdered, the killer gets charged with 2 murders. You have Bush to thank for that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unborn_Victims_of_Violence_Act The Unborn Victims of Violence Act was strongly opposed by most pro-choice organizations, on grounds that the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision said that the human fetus is not a "person" under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and that if the fetus were a Fourteenth Amendment "person," then they would ha…
/r/MensRights17/09/16 12:51 PM
0

The partygoers witnessed that they intended to have sex. Drunk people don't suddenly become credible witnesses just because they say what you want to hear. On the other hand, the completely incoherent voicemail she left for her boyfriend is evidence of her level of intoxication at the given time. Her scrapes may have resulted from her drunken fall. That seems unlikely, given the multitude of scrapes and abrasions on her buttocks. The debris in her vag likely entered when she sat up on pine needl…
/r/MensRights11/09/16 05:07 AM
–

"The city's percentage of rape cases determined to be 'false or baseless' has more than tripled since 1991, making Baltimore a national leader in that category." Graph 2.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 11:47 PM
–

the fact that the unfounded rate is in line with other jurisdictions It isn't. Quite far from it. https://archive.is/n3Ag0 We had this thread a little while back, though unfortunately the OP assumed all unfounded rape accusations are false accusations.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 11:18 PM
1

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2010-06-27/news/bs-md-ci-rapes-20100519_1_rosalyn-branson-police-detective-police-figures Actually, this has been ongoing in Baltimore for a good many years.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 11:11 PM
2

The reasoning for this is that you cannot sign away your legal rights or the legal rights of your dependents. The child would be legally entitled to financial support. Not saying I agree or disagree with that reasoning, just explaining how it is.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 03:22 PM
–

You have eyewitness testimony of her actions at the party, from people who were intoxicated at the time. You have his unsubstantiated version of events, which the jury did not find to be credible given the documented abrasions and tears her genitalia sustained, the scrapes that supported the allegation that she had been dragged at some point, and that paramedics and hospital staff were unable to revive her for over four hours. Therefore, you do not have conclusive evidence that his conviction wa…
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:13 AM
–

since his conviction was false That is an opinion, not a fact.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:20 AM
2

Paramedics and hospital staff were unable to revive her for more than four hours.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:41 PM
–

I don't think the False Accusation flair should be used for a case where someone was convicted.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 06:39 PM
3

Have you been to a doctor? Are you certain that your insensitivity is a result of your circumcision? I ask because what you're describing can also often result from what's commonly referred to as "death grip" masturbation, something that can be easily remedied. http://www.curedeathgrip.com/
/r/MensRights09/09/16 12:34 AM
0

Among his other two convictions, he was convicted of assault with intent to rape.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 08:57 PM
–

UMass, Vanderbilt, Darren Sharper, Daniel Holtzclaw. Those are just some recent high profile gang rapist and serial rapist convictions.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 08:45 PM
–

http://fox8.com/2016/08/04/14-year-old-accused-of-killing-father-family-says-girl-is-hero-who-saved-them-all/
/r/MensRights02/09/16 08:01 PM
–

http://fox8.com/2016/08/04/14-year-old-accused-of-killing-father-family-says-girl-is-hero-who-saved-them-all/ 14-year-old girl, name released, picture released, shot her alleged abuser, charged with murder.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 07:54 PM
–

From the article OP's video is from- http://www.today.com/news/chessy-prout-st-paul-s-school-assault-survivor-sheds-anonymity-t102326 Labrie, 20, was acquitted on three counts of felony sexual assault in August 2015 and convicted on three counts of misdemeanor sexual assault, felony illegal use of computer services and misdemeanor endangering the welfare of a child. Other sources that concur-- http://www.cbsnews.com/news/chessy-prout-owen-labrie-sex-assault-case-st-pauls-school/ http://www.bosto…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 01:08 AM
–

He was convicted on three counts of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 06:54 PM
–

He actually was already shown leniency. He plead guilty to multiple counts of rape, sexual assault, conspiracy to distribute Alprazolam, Diazepam and Zolpidem with intent to commit rape, and multiple counts of distributing these substances with intent to commit rape. He could have received a minimum 15-20 year sentence for several of those charges, and he could have had to serve those sentences consecutively rather than concurrently.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:21 AM
3

Yeah, I'm not really sure what's controversial about that.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:21 PM
–

So you're simply saying that the accuser is also presumed innocent until proven guilty. And that for the accused to be acquitted of rape isn't by itself proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the accuser's guilt.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:46 PM
–

Only the actual court papers are worth considering somewhat reliable. Did you read them to reach your conclusions on this case? Can you link to them?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:26 PM
–

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/10/university-of-colorado-sexual-assault-austin-wilkerson Wilkerson later told a university investigator that he had made “repeated advances on the victim, but that she rebuffed him each time”, and that he felt “pissed off” and that she was a “fucking bitch”, according to prosecutors. After initially denying the extent of the assault, he allegedly admitted to friends that he had “fingered a girl while passed out” and “let his hands wander”. Before the…
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:56 PM
0

If she asked for Quaaludes, as you repeatedly claim, she didn't get them-- as has been already explained. She received Benadryl instead, as per Cosby's statement to the police. I suggest you actually read the section of the probable cause affidavit I specified two posts ago, V. Criminal Investigation and Cosby's Statement to Police, before commenting further. It's not long.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:26 PM
–

No, he stated he didn't directly specify the pills in a situation where the pills were already assumed. It says verbatim, "Cosby admitted that he did not tell the victim, on that night or anytime thereafter, the true identity of the pills." If she assumed she was getting Quaaludes, as you say, well, she didn't get any. He gave her Benadryl, admitting to the police that that drug would put him to sleep right away. Not my idea of a party drug, mind you.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 12:23 AM
–

He fully admitted to the police that he never disclosed the true identity of the pills to one accuser, which makes it difficult for him to maintain his story that the accusers gave their informed consent to party drugs. https://www.scribd.com/doc/294297478/Criminal-Complaint-Bill-Cosby V. Criminal Investigation and Cosby's Statement to Police begins on page 7 of the affidavit, which can be found beginning on page 10 of the Scribd document.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 03:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter