TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Guatemalanwatersnake Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by Guatemalanwatersnake on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

It’s like there’s this weird obsession with making it so that women are exactly the same as men or that they’re even more masculine then men. Decades ago it was all about getting women into the workforce so they can be more like men now it’s about women working the same exact jobs as men at the same percentages and getting paid the same exact wages as men. Anything else is sexist misogyny. And apparently you hate women now for thinking it’s good for women to be pretty and feminine; it’s just a r…
/r/MensRights07/04/19 07:25 AM
14

Lots of fat girls on Tinder not that I’m complaining or anything; being fat is a choice unlike your height.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 01:37 AM
-2

It’s a fact that the mother carries the child from conception to birth. That’s just factual. I never said that dads don’t support their wives and children during pregnancy; they clearly do.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 03:36 AM
-5

There’s a difference between making the child, or conceiving the child, and carrying the child to birth; the mother and father share an equal part in conceiving the child but the mother carries the child after conception until he or she is born. The child is already “made” at conception but is developing.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 02:15 AM
24

There’s two sides to every story. People rush to judgement very quickly at times
/r/MensRights13/03/19 02:41 AM
1

That’s probably true with some jobs
/r/MensRights10/03/19 02:58 PM
9

No, I’m talking about things like lesbian dance theory and medieval renaissance poetry.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 12:04 PM
1

She mentioned God and natural law albeit erroneously. I had to correct that
/r/MensRights10/03/19 04:01 AM
1

Umm, hasn’t she heard of wet dreams? Not that I want to get explicit. Pregnancy is a shared responsibility. God created Adam and Eve.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 03:40 AM
38

And less dangerous jobs. Pursuing worthless degrees is also part of it
/r/MensRights10/03/19 02:45 AM
36

But yet they make less money overall. Part of it might be the degrees they pursue
/r/MensRights10/03/19 02:02 AM
3

Fear is actually part of what keeps us alive. The “fearless girl” actually sets a bad example because it shows that this girl has serious brain damage and will likely get herself killed. Like the “fearless girl” in front of the raging bull. And it’s not very feminine. It’s just backwards and wrong in so many ways
/r/MensRights10/03/19 12:38 AM
11

A girl in Texas won the State wrestling championship after taking testosterone and claiming to be a boy; she never got to actually compete against boys.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:03 PM
38

Umm, even the best female athletes on the planet get destroyed by high school aged boys; there is no competition and it’s kind of cruel to put boys and girls in that situation.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 02:12 PM
7

I work a job that’s almost 99% male and I get paid pretty good to do it. It must be the patriarchy preventing more women from operating cranes and tow motors and working in machine shops
/r/MensRights04/03/19 12:45 AM
1

I know, but it’s amusing using their own insanity against them
/r/MensRights25/02/19 08:09 PM
2

Well, you could just identify by some other gender then to get in
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:57 AM
1

Yeah, I wouldn't touch her with a 20-foot pole; surely this isn't the first sign that she's completely bonkers.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 10:42 PM
1

They should wait until they're married anyway. She's a crazy one
/r/MensRights19/02/19 10:30 PM
23

Yeah, it's definitely an attack against men coming from females who ironically exhibit much more masculine characteristics. It's good that men are made to be much more violent and aggressive as the stronger vessel; we need that aggression to survive in really rough environments and to keep the women and children safe. ​ The problem is unjust actions, not "male socialization". Men are intended to be leaders and warriors and men are often restricted to fulfilling their natural roles in society. Th…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 04:06 AM
1

No, women don't do that very often at all and it's the opposite of feminine. And on top of that women do stuff all the time nowadays that isn't feminine.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:02 PM
1

I'm talking about people. And female animals killing their young isn't feminine either. If circumstances were really rough they'd practice monogamy and put great effort into raising fewer, more fit offspring who can successfully compete for scarce resources. Wolves are a great example. Perhaps eating or discarding offspring is the result of a sudden dearth of resources among animals that are unfit to compete.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 04:00 AM
0

My only point, really, is that in order for it to be toxic femininity it must be feminine; women nowadays do things all the time that aren’t feminine and I believe seeking an abortion is one of them. There are ways in which femininity and masculinity can be negative or “toxic” but it’s much simpler to focus on bad behavior without trying to attribute it.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:25 AM
0

I know you weren’t talking about abortion; you were talking about women killing babies, and you claimed that women kill more of them but I countered that by mentioning that the vast majority of abortion doctors to my knowledge are men. Some babies are aborted past birth. Of course women can exhibit toxic behavior but that doesn’t make the behavior feminine. There’s nothing feminine about killing a baby; it’s the opposite of feminine. When I think of toxic femininity I think of things like gossip…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:11 AM
-2

The vast majority of abortion doctors are men if I’m not mistaken. Murdering children is not feminine even though you associate this horrific act with women; it’s feminine, and womanly, to be loving and nurturing towards children. This is why over 90% of nurses and elementary school teachers are women.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:36 AM
-2

There’s nothing feminine about that. It’s feminine to be loving and nurturing while this is the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:24 AM
7

Being very aggressive and competitive in a sport or athletic endeavor while still displaying good sportsmanship.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 03:29 AM
10

Women historically needed protection in much rougher times when resources were very scarce and when the world was a much more wild place; divorce was a lot less common, and to get divorced you had to prove infidelity. Marriage was taken very seriously back then. But now we’re living in an age of great wealth, security, and prosperity so women no longer need this kind of protection from men. We don’t have to worry about barbarians at the door or about famine.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 01:24 PM
2

and I find consist more of exceptions than of rules. Especially when it comes to such individual and personal choices as life-partner. That’s because of your faulty interpretations, your biases, and your over-reliance on subjective anecdotes. The rule, that opposites attract, is overwhelmingly true. Masculine is attracted to feminine and vice-versa. I'm just complaining that you make overly broad, generalizing, even borderline collectivistic statements. You’re upset that I’m speaking in broad, g…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:40 AM
3

That's some pseudo bullshit. No, it’s just fact. You’re obviously pretty offended by it which comes as little surprise. I've seen too many bodybuilder-couples and androgynous goth couples to think for a moment this is true. I was speaking in broad, general terms and I’m correct under those terms; humans are complex, and you’ll find examples which seem to go against the rule. The “androgynous goth” couples aren’t an example of masculine men and feminine women so they hardly work against my argume…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:11 AM
3

Masculine men prefer feminine women and vice-versa; the saying goes that opposites attract which is true. A very feminine woman is going to be submissive by nature and very nurturing; and that’s a great thing, because we need these feminine women just as much as we need the macho dominant men. But nowadays there’s way too many effeminate men and way too many masculine women; just as there’s a lot more bastard children and single mothers.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 07:54 AM
0

From a Christian perspective, one advantage of getting married is that you can be intimate with your wife without committing an act of sin; you're also joined together, by God, and so you cannot be divorced or separated excluding reasons like adultery which even then you're still encouraged to stay together and work through it. You also cannot be divorced and remarried. ​ Also, as the husband you're the head of the household and this comes with a great deal of responsibility; your wife and your …
/r/MensRights03/12/18 10:51 PM
2

It’s a massive echo chamber over there and you somehow deviated from what they find acceptable which isn’t hard to do. I say we should embrace the many inherent inequalities between the two genders and just acknowledge the fact that we’re different. Let men be men and let women be women; let’s not get the two confused.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:38 AM
13

Same thing with chess. The top female player in the world right now is ranked 91st. She’s pretty damn good, don’t get me wrong, but she’s not competing against guys in the top 10 or 15. And with physical competitions the results are even more triggering for feminists. Australia’s national women’s soccer team, one of the best female teams on the planet, got beat 7-0 by a team of under-15 boys just 2 years ago.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 03:34 AM
2

I wasn't trying to disagree; I was just pointing out how test scores are higher among boys while grades are lower in classes due to disciplinary and other reasons. The public school system just isn't designed for boys
/r/MensRights06/10/18 11:56 PM
9

Yeah, but the boys do much better on the SAT's and the difference is even greater at the top. I would argue the American public school system puts boys at a natural disadvantage; they have you sit in a room all day rather than doing something physical excluding gym and maybe shop class. http://msmagazine.com/blog/2018/02/15/highest-performing-women-still-scoring-lower-men-sat/
/r/MensRights06/10/18 02:00 PM
1

It's not incredible at all; it's just what you should expect from these people who cannot be reasoned with. And acknowledging that the child is a human being with unique, one-of-a-kind DNA solves a big part of the problem. You acknowledge this is a child with a biological mother and father who each have the right to know when the child is conceived.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 04:03 AM
-15

The man is partially to blame for marrying that witch in the first place; as a father, you have every right to know when your child is conceived. I would only ever marry a girl I go to Church with on Sunday and who understands the importance of protecting the unborn. You can't reason with evil and nor should you try to appease it; there's a war going on in the culture and it's a spiritual war as well.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:52 AM
0

There's truth to the first part of your comment, men generally have an edge in combat due to physical characteristics. Men always have a massive edge in combat. This is by design. Men have higher percentages of muscle mass, more fast twitch muscle fibers, lower percentages of body fat, greater bone density, different bone structures, and faster reaction times. And yeah, men also tend to be much bigger and taller. In the Olympics, even the biggest, strongest female weightlifter is weaker than som…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:20 PM
1

You're disgusting if you believe that's an agenda you should support under any circumstances. I would tell you not to be disgusting but for you that's an impossible task. If developers want to use their games, whether historically based or not, to promote such a backwards idea then they should not obtain support. They should bear the cost of promoting their far-left sociopolitical agenda in their product.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 04:45 PM
1

Yeah, and the Soviets had a history of trying to use female soldiers for propaganda going back to the first World War though their initial experiments failed miserably; it's literal propaganda from godless communists. In America, we certainly frowned upon that and didn't try to give it any credence by acknowledging it in our history textbooks.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 07:12 AM
8

Women have no place in war or in combat; they just weren't biologically constructed for it and nor were they ever intended to fulfill such a role. It's like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Our forefathers knew this. I won't support any game or company that promotes such an agenda. Women should be feminine and men should be masculine.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:09 AM
9

She must have broken keyfabe. Happens to the best of us
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:49 AM
2

Reaction times are very important with games and women have slower reaction times even with training which is why they lag behind. It's the same thing with certain martial arts like Muay Thai which have a very heavy emphasis on striking and a bit of clinch work; women just can't react and move as quickly physically which makes the difference even greater.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:12 AM
1

True masculinity ceased being a requirement when they began having female cops who can only try to imitate masculinity. Women just aren't biologically constructed for things like firefighting, infantry, and law enforcement and we've known this as a society for a very long time but now we're just too "politically correct" to admit it. Even if a female meets the initial requirements to participate in one of these jobs she's still dealing with weaker bones, a different bone structure, slower reacti…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 10:20 PM
-3

Bigotry is intolerance towards those who hold different opinions; I'm a proponent of free speech and thus I tolerate all opinions. Ironically, you telling me to leave is a sign of bigotry because it indicates you don't tolerate me for having different opinions. Pot, meet kettle. And, this will be my last response here because many of you simply cannot be reasoned with. Homosexual acts are and have always been perversions of the flesh.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:23 PM
-18

It is very natural for men to go off to work to provide for their families while women stay at home to nurture children; historically, humans have held onto this tradition in many places while it's taught in the Bible. Men who have sex with men are just 2% of the total population while they commit up to a third of all child sex abuse crimes and perhaps more when you consider the girls they may abuse. "Intergenerational intimacy" I believe is a popular theme in "gay" literature.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 12:43 PM
-22

I'm not talking about tens of thousands of years ago, I'm talking about just 50 or 100 years ago and the changes which have occurred in that relatively short time within society; you're telling me "that's not a good argument" after you blatantly tried to misrepresent my argument. Your straw man is a bad argument and it's deliberately bad because you made it to be. I'm sure you're well aware of the disease rates among homosexuals and the child sex abuse rates among them; there's a very good reaso…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 12:33 PM
-65

Intrinsically, I think we all know he's a man attempting to take on a woman's role but we're too "politically correct" to admit it. What he calls "sexism" is really just a natural response to what we find repulsive due to years and years of tradition and biology. And it really is remarkable just how much society has changed over the past century or so. 100 years ago, this man would be convicted and jailed for committing buggery in Britain but now he's allowed to adopt children despite what stati…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:27 AM
-18

That's not the ideal age to get it done and not getting it done for so long removes the benefits in that time not to mention the traditions. So no, it's not the same and it's still something which should be determined by parents. I mean, you can wait until you're 18 to begin kindergarten as well so maybe parents have no right to decide that either.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:49 PM
-2

I don't buy into that nonsense but it's an interesting discussion nonetheless. Newborns cannot decide while objectively it can be argued that it is or isn't more beneficial.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:36 PM
-10

The newborn cannot decide or give consent thus parents must decide on behalf of the child. I would say the kind of food the child is given and what school the child goes to is far more important just to list a couple of examples.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:33 PM
-1

I would call that anecdotal evidence which indicates that you live in a very small bubble of the medical commumity. As another example, doctors at the CDC stated that the science clearly proves that the benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks: https://www.today.com/health/circumcision-benefits-outweigh-risks-cdc-says-1D80331010 It's definitely about you being convinced and being very closed-minded to the other side of the argument. You believe your position is "fact" and there's not a thing …
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:31 PM
-17

You didn't fix anything. What you did was deceptively take what I said out-of-context and change it. You're a liar. Newborn babies can't make the decision or give consent and thus the decision must be made on their behalf by parents; I said parents, specifically, and not "other people" which is vague. Some men don't care about this issue while others do.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:19 PM
-3

My understanding of it is that there's a controversy among professionals as to whether it's medically more beneficial. You're obviously convinced that it's not but hopefully you're willing to at least consider the other side. https://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/guide/circumcision
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:15 PM
-24

Some men don't care while others do support circumcision; that's just a fact. Regardless, the decision should be left up to parents and there are far more important decisions which parents get to make on behalf of their children.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:07 PM
7

Absolutely. Feminism truly is cancer. You really should acknowledge and appreciate the many natural inequalities and differences between the two genders while feminists have always failed at doing this; a lot of these people now think that there's 58 genders or whatever but I digress. I would say girls are being set-up for failure when they're being told they're equal to boys at everything and that when they grow up they should attempt taking on roles naturally intended for men. Nevermind just b…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 07:21 PM
12

This was almost a good troll but you gave it away at the end with that bit about eliminating newborn males. Be a bit more subtle next time and maybe more people will take the bait.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:56 PM
2

Oh yeah, of course we are. Women are often being promoted as very masculine, manly, and tough because they want to be equal at everything including things which they cannot be due to physical and biological limitations. We see this with sports and athletics along with business and politics and even the military. Women are trying to act like men, be like men, and take on men's roles to attempt "equality" even though such equality does not exist or even come close. I would say we're masculinizing …
/r/MensRights01/07/18 09:48 PM
10

And why are we masculinizing women? It's like we're seeing a lack of sexual dimorphism and the reversal of sex-specific traits; I think a lot of this has to do with biology and our environment. In earlier times, when resources were scarce, there was much more emphasis and value put on monogamy and high investment child-rearing while men were the only ones who confronted danger and went to war. Women relied on men for survival and protection.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 08:58 PM
1

There are many ways in which the genders are not equal and that will never change. The gender inequality is great because that means men and women compliment each other and have different roles to fulfill.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 12:23 AM
6

Isn't femininity supposed to be.....fragile? That sounds like a feminine quality.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 09:43 PM
0

Your arrow is actually pointing directly at your username. Oh, the irony. The Federalist is merely citing the statistics from a different source and adding commentary. It's clear that we're never going to reach any kind of agreement and thus this will be my final reply. Good day.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 11:26 PM
0

That's because your source doesn't make the critical distinction between mere affiliation and actual attendance and devotion to the faith. Again, Churchgoing Christians by far have the lowest rates of divorce out of anyone and it's incredibly lower than the divorce rates of the nonreligious. Devout, faithful Christians have the advantage of understanding the true significance and meaning of marriage while also understanding that divorce is always bad.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 11:23 PM
2

You lost. I got you in checkmate. Tiny sect? Cherry picking? No, I'm just talking about the Christians who actually go to Church regularly like the Bible teaches and are likewise much more devout in their faith. Churchgoing Christians are by far the least likely people to get divorced out of anyone and this includes even the Protestants who don't take as hard of a stand against divorce like they should. Every source has bias. Bias doesn't make you wrong. The statistics I cited, by the way, actua…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 11:14 PM
1

We're not gonna reach any kind of agreement here but I hope that, in time, you change your views and embrace the Lord. This will be my final reply. That's of the overall population; among religious people, it's 90% Christian. Maybe you should have specified that to begin with. Assuming your statistic to be true, it's still not 90% Christian but rather 90% who self-identify as Christian; big difference. OK, if they deny the Nicene Creed, then it's fair to not call them Christians (divinity of Jes…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 10:08 PM
1

I'll share my reply with you as well. http://thefederalist.com/2014/07/08/a-bit-of-religion-can-be-bad-for-marriage/ "Figure 1 shows, the two groups likely to have the most conservative family values (high-attending conservative Protestants and high-attending Catholics) are also least likely to have divorced." "In multivariate analyses, high-attending conservative Protestant young adults have 34 percent lower odds of divorcing than do the non-religious, and high-attending Catholic young adults h…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:42 PM
3

In the United States, that means 90% Christian. Only about 70% even identify as Christian while among this 70% you have fake Christians who flatly reject Biblical teachings and even the divinity of Christ. Ah, so now we have added a word. That's a start. It kind of goes without saying that you must actually practice and be devoted to the faith. Not true; atheists have them beat. Very true. Regular Church-attending Catholics and even Protestants have the "atheists" or nonreligious beat by a mile.…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:40 PM
5

http://thefederalist.com/2014/07/08/a-bit-of-religion-can-be-bad-for-marriage/ "Figure 1 shows, the two groups likely to have the most conservative family values (high-attending conservative Protestants and high-attending Catholics) are also least likely to have divorced." "In multivariate analyses, high-attending conservative Protestant young adults have 34 percent lower odds of divorcing than do the non-religious, and high-attending Catholic young adults have 76 percent lower odds of divorcing…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:32 PM
-2

"Religious people". So this includes Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, pagans, fake Christians, and others who are all unGodly. Churchgoing Christians are by far the least likely to get divorced out of anyone; it turns out that Church attendance and actual devotion to the faith is far more important than mere affiliation. The Bible is the word of God; in case you haven't figure it out yet, the world is full of nonsense and we need the Bible to correct it.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:26 PM
-19

I've heard of it. I've also heard of the Bible. "To the married I give this charge (not I, but the Lord): the wife should not separate from her husband (but if she does, she should remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband), and the husband should not divorce his wife." -1 Corinthians 7:10-11 "So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” -Matthew 19:6 Oh, and remarriage is adultery.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:10 PM
-25

Guess what? If your wife is Godly and Christian then you won't go through the system to begin with. You'll be married and together raising your children the way God intended.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:02 PM
-25

Did he marry the crazy woman or did he just fornicate with her? It's very important to find a Godly, Christian wife before having any children. Avoid this horrible, broken family court system until or unless it gets fixed and corrected.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 07:43 PM
3

You could hardly go anywhere at all and yet still be accused of going "too far". It's in the eye of the beholder, I guess.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:55 AM
12

Men and women, in a lot of ways, just aren't equal; people are demanding equality that does not exist and they're even trying to force it with quotas and legislation. They might decide that there aren't enough male nurses and male elementary school teachers so they'll make a "50/50" hiring quota to trying and force some sense of equality; the problem, of course, is that in the process a lot of good female teachers and nurses won't get the opportunity even though they're clearly better for the jo…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter