TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HPGMaphax Archive

View 0 posts and 150 comments by HPGMaphax on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The kind that supports your claim?
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:49 PM
0

You’re the one making the claim here
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:21 PM
-9

So then it should be really easy to find at least a survey confirming this right?
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:12 PM
-1

Yeah when you multiple anything like that you can make it a bigger number
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:11 PM
-13

You say it’s common, but is it actually? Do you have anything to base that on other than anecdotes? And reading the OP, it seems to hint quite the opposite if I’m honest. He outlines a single occurrence, asking others if this is common. That’s not really something you do if it’s a common occurrence
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:24 PM
-4

That is pretty neat, although we’re talking about 7 minutes per day here, hardly enough to be meaningful
/r/MensRights28/02/23 10:22 PM
-6

Do you have a source on the average commute? But even then, the money earned isn’t really relevant here, and thats my point
/r/MensRights28/02/23 09:27 PM
-10

I don’t see how that is really relevant here? People have arguments about dumb things when they are stressed or just have a bad day, that’s completely normal. The argument doesn’t have to be reasonable
/r/MensRights28/02/23 09:01 PM
-9

That isn’t super relevant to the discussion at hand though, is it? We’re talking primarily about hours worked here, not money earned. It’s hardly fair to say you have to do more chores because you made less money, even though both of us worked for 40hr/week.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 08:20 PM
-15

Holy shit, this guy had one completely normal argument that ended respectfully with no real hurt feelings and this entire thread instantly jumps to divorce… If this is how you handle issues and bumps in your relationships, don’t be surprised when they don’t last 30 years
/r/MensRights28/02/23 08:09 PM
0

Is it your claim that almost no household can fairly distribute chores, and that this is related to the education of the woman? That sounds… pretty crazy, do you have anything to back that up?
/r/MensRights28/02/23 08:02 PM
-21

What exactly do you mean by frequent conversation here? In the OPs post? If so, where does he say this is frequent? In society in general? What are you basing that on exactly?
/r/MensRights28/02/23 08:00 PM
-4

Or it’s complete normal, one person has a bad day and found something unfair without really thinking about the whole situation, then was a bit reluctant to back down again, as is completely human.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 07:57 PM
-6

Yeah screw trans people and their… desire to be treated as human beings?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 08:54 PM
2

Do you not realise the irony of wanting people to stop using specific words regardless of context, while at the same time opposing “woke morons”?
/r/MensRights27/02/23 08:53 PM
1

But why? Is it relevant information? Yes, if he was trans there would be other organisations who could help (wether you think that is right is irrelevant) Did you understand what OP meant? Yes, you clearly do. So what is the problem here? Can we stop this idea that words themselves are somehow harmful or should be avoided? You sound exactly like the people wanting to ban the N word regardless of context… you’re better than that, don’t stoop to those levels
/r/MensRights27/02/23 08:50 PM
12

It is completely normal behaviour and there really isn’t anything wrong with it either. There are plenty of valid reasons you might want to know how much someone makes at a specific position, and you have nothing to lose by sharing it. Please talk about your salary and benefits with anyone in remotely the same field! The only people who benefit from you keeping it a secret is your employer
/r/MensRights20/02/23 04:18 PM
-2

Do you honestly trust a system that gives full custody to a drug addict to fairly apply the death penalty? You have waaaaay more trust in the system than me at least
/r/MensRights19/02/23 04:59 PM
16

How is this dragged out? They are fucking speedtunning it
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/22 09:13 AM
3

Reminds me of a great quote: “If you find yourself attracted to girls still in high school, the best way to get over that is by talking to one”
/r/MensRights06/08/21 09:58 PM
3

The same evidence as in every other rape trial? A good start would be to prove that intercourse actually happened. The provlem is that we have seen cases like this, where a mans life was ruined because of a ton of false allegations, so the amount of allegations should never be used as an argument. One that was popular is the “mattress girl” story from a few uears back now. The literal math says the probability of this guy not having done anything wrong to these women is near zero. No one is that…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 05:02 PM
14

Why wouldn’t the allegations be truthful? Because noone has been able to prove one? Despite the sheer amount of them. They have proved some, he’s been expelled and shit for it. It’s hardly serious if the only consequence is being expelled, besides, you can be expelled from unproven allegations, the school system doesn’t care about justice, only it’s own image, let’s be honest. You think that everyone who is a shitty person and has done shitty things, hasn’t actually done those things unless a ju…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:31 PM
13

I too was diddled as a child by u/Themobgirl
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:36 PM
24

He has so many accusations yet they haven’t been able to prove just one? Sorry but it seems those allegations aren’t all that truthful.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 03:33 PM
1

Abuse is a abuse, thats not my argument. I’m arguing that just calling someone abusive is counterproductive, no matter who does it. I don’t care if some feminists are also doing it, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re better than them, please don’t prove me wrong there.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 11:58 PM
1

Two wrongs don’t make a right. Your entire argument is based on “they are doing it to us so we should do it to them”, which just doesn’t sit well with me. I’m afraid you’re doing the very men you aim to protect a disservice by not targetting the root cause. I don’t care what feminists say or do, I care about the people in abusive relationships, and the way to fix them.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 11:19 PM
1

Because that was the part I originally commented on? I’m not talking about individual cases here, so there is no reason to bring them up.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 10:12 PM
1

Noone is asking you to minimize anything. If you’re in an abusive relationship, you should absolutely identify that and leave, but just calling someone “abusive” misses the bigger picture and actual problems. There are reasons for abusive behaviour, which we as a society need to understand and stop hiding behind just calling someone abusive. What facts am I getting wrong here exactly?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:07 PM
1

This is just counterproductive and fueled by revenge, we don’t need to start calling more women abusive, we have to stop calling men abusive. Calling someone “abusive” is just such a non starter, it completely disregards the underlying reasons a relationship is abusive, there is more to it than one person being “abusive”. In general, people don’t intentionally hurt each other for the sake of doing so, at least not to the extend that we see domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 05:38 PM
2

Apples and oranges are also both fruits. Sometimes it makes sense to compare them, other tjmes is doesn’t.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 09:00 AM
1

There was no need to quote the entire comment, we see it too...
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 11:20 PM
1

Yeah I’m sure it’s just a total coincidence.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/20 05:41 AM
1

Which I did
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/20 08:19 PM
1

I’m not about to spend hours writing an article about human attraction. The research has been done, the fundemental reasons more women are bi is the exact same reason women in general prefer looking at women more than men do men. This is just evolution, it’s not controversial in the slightest.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/20 07:00 PM
1

I mean, I can, I’m not particularly invested. Anyway, here is a post that illustrates it. A quick google search also comes to the same conclusion. It’s not illegal to look for info yourself...
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/20 05:42 PM
9

Studies show that women like looking at other women more than men like looking at other men, by a significant amount too. So the answer is likely no.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/20 07:32 AM
9

You actually managed to ignore the main argument, focus on a tangent, and still misrepresent it. Thats... impressive.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 10:46 AM
8

You can’t just blame all societal differences on the amount of money payed in taxes. The culture in scandinavia is so fundementally different to that in the US that it can’t be explained by one single factor, as you inply.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 10:32 AM
10

We aren’t talking about child birth - which isn’t even dangerous in the first world anymore - but about abortions.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 10:30 AM
2

Based auth right
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/20 12:50 AM
1

I agree, but I don’t think forcing jail time is the solution.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/20 05:04 PM
1

That just sounds like revenge to me, which I don’t believe should be a part of the justice system.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/20 04:13 PM
1

Yes, you have to sell all non exempt property, which varies by state. I oversimplified a lot, as my main argument is just that you don’t just “declare bankruptcy” and be done with it. The laws vary a lot by state, country, and how you file, but in general you have to make an honest attempt at paying back your debt before you can file. This usually includes spending all your disposable income, abd potentially selling non exempt property.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/20 10:27 AM
0

If someone destroyed half your house, would you not rather have them pay you for damages, than have then go to jail and you being left with the bill? I don’t think this whole rage boner is healthy.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/20 10:22 AM
19

You can’t declare bankruptcy before basically selling everything you own, so it’s not exactly as simple as that.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/20 09:06 PM
8

Yeah and he’s only unemployable for the rest of his life, a registered sex offender and infamous worldwide. A mere slap on the wrist
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/20 09:03 PM
0

Where do you live that DUI is a jail sentence?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/20 09:01 PM
-2

If you pay off all the damage you do, is that not punishment enough?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/20 08:59 PM
3

It wouldn’t be Reddit if we did.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/20 05:24 AM
1

I disagree that “murder is murder” as you say. I really do belive murder is one of the most nuanced crimes we have. There are so many different ways you can murder someone, and I don’t think they should all get life in prison for it. So yeah, first degree murder is very rarely charged, because it very rarely happens. I don’t think anyone deserves 25 years for involuntary manslaughter for example.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 09:40 AM
1

I cannot see how that wouldn’t have a toll on her mental health. Because she is 2 years old... I’m not saying it’s impossible that it can have an effect, but I highly doubt it, as things that happen at such a young age rarely lead to demonstrable long term harm. You’re making too many assumptions, you clearly don’t actually know my position on this, so calm down a bit. Yes, this is clearly rape, in no way do I disagree, literally all I said was that this likely wouldn’t lead to trauma. As for th…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 09:35 AM
1

She got what she deserved, thats a PPD IMHO. Not sure why everyone is trying to argue it’s not lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 01:16 AM
1

It is more than one crime, and the minimum punishment for (first degree) murder is 25 years, so while technically longer, it’s picking at straws. If you see people getting much less time for murder, it was likely manslaughter or some other “indirect” murder.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 01:15 AM
4

Attitude aside, we really don’t have the context required to judge if this is justified or not. This is at least rape of a very young minor plus distribution of child pornography, plus any other potential miscellanious charges not mentioned in the article. Add on to that the fact that sentences regularly get cut short because of good behaviour/parole/bail and you’re not actually looking at 26 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 01:11 AM
3

For what it’s worth, this is a different crime than usual (or rather, crimes). It’s rape of a baby, which I believe is classified differently than rape of children, I know some countries at least differentiate between children over and under ~12 years. It’s also sharing child pornography. On top of this, there are probably details we don’t have that would have come up in trial. I do agree though, that it’s likely not a double standard but actual justice.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 01:08 AM
-2

Proving trauma at that age is nearly impossible. As is usually the case with these things, we don’t have nearly enough context to judge if the punishment is fair, for that you’d need to be at the trial.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 01:04 AM
0

How is opposing prison vigilanties and mob rule the same as defending a child rapist? I get that it’s a sensitive subject, but that doesn’t mean you can just throw logic out the window. If the punishment isn’t fair, you change the punishment, you don’t rely on mob justice. The prison system is for justice, not revenge.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 01:00 AM
3

It is not unfortunate. The prison system is for justice, not revenge.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/20 12:56 AM
2

You can have the right to an abortion and still think it’s a bad thing. We have the right to do a lot of morally bad things, and sometimes there are good reasons to do “bad” things.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 11:42 PM
9

Thats some grade A mind reading skills you have there.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 09:28 AM
3

How?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/20 06:11 PM
2

Then you would very quickly realize you are full of shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/20 06:06 PM
3

Have you ever been to China?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/20 04:38 PM
1

Thats not being a good king, in fact, that is a very quick way to get overthrown lol.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/20 07:11 AM
8

I hate how we call it circumcision instead of what it really is, MGM.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 02:08 PM
12

Circumsized dicks don’t get dick cheese. Neither do people with normal fuckin hygene
/r/MensRights01/01/20 02:06 PM
12

That would be the religious explanation, yes. It is, however, facetious claim that people use hygene/health as another major argument. If the only arguments used were traditional/religious it would not have held on as long as it has.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 02:04 PM
4

This would be a good argument if we didn’t also see way higher suicide rates for men in countries where access to guns is limited at best.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 09:36 PM
-1

You say it’s not a gender/biological difference, but then perfectly explain why it’s a biological difference lol
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/19 04:15 PM
12

It makes sense why men would be funnier than women, evolutionarily speaking being funny helps males find a mate, not the other way around.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/19 04:12 PM
8

The two are very different. PUAs aren’t about manipulating women for sex, thats an insane conclusion. It’s all consentiual and PUAs are 99% just about having the confidence to engage conversations in an enviornment that facilitates casual sex (bars, clubbing), in which both prties consent. The post in question is a “guide” about how to manipulate and guilt trip someone into paying for your food without originally consenting. If the sane tactics were used by PUAs, I’md obviously not support that,…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:24 PM
9

Thats a horrible comparison, people aren’t mad about the casual dating/PUA, it’s the scamming for free food thats the problem.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:08 PM
3

Free healthcare also tries to treat everything, spending tons of money attempting to prolonge a patients life by a couple months. It’s also, not free, just payed by taxes instead.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:58 PM
1

Thats completely normal
/r/MensRights09/02/19 07:21 AM
1

Let's not
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:36 PM
38

Good mod
/r/MensRights23/08/18 06:18 AM
1

DUIs are more serious though. They can end a life, instead of just ruin it.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 02:30 PM
2

Aren't men technically the minority compared to women? And can you only disgriminate against one majority? Or can I discriminate against black people in favor of jewish gay people for example?
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:20 AM
2

Please no, we don't want swedish immigrants either
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:51 AM
1

There has to be more to it than this. Nobody would ever pass something this stupid, right?
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:50 AM
2

It's sad that the /s is even needed
/r/MensRights23/04/18 02:47 PM
1

Emotional damage or something.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 09:11 AM
1

Stimulants are still drugs
/r/MensRights23/02/18 08:03 PM
1

Just so we're clear, you know what drugs are right?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:59 PM
6

Because we should want equality and not equity. I assume you are against diversity quotas, for example.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:41 PM
4

He probobly has to pay everything himself, he probobly alse has to pay the cops. Thats usually how the states work
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:59 PM
1

No
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:14 AM
1

And I'm merely telling you how that is counterproductive.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:13 AM
0

You run into the exact same problem the feminists do. You try to quantify opression instead of focusing on the problems that actually matter.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:08 PM
-1

Stop playing the victim. You're literally doing the exact same thing the feminists are. It doesn't work when they do, and it doesn't work when you do it
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:16 AM
3

No they aren't. They are just difficult in different ways, let's stop acting like the feminist.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:08 PM
5

Wrong sub tho
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:58 PM
2

It's almost like two adults dividing the chores between themselves, how sexist!
/r/MensRights03/12/17 12:33 AM
1

Technically it takes up room and money, so some people lose something. A small price to pay for equality, but a price nonetheless.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 12:31 AM
18

So respectful that they are willing to pay the price that has no effect on them what so ever.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 12:29 AM
1

While not criminal, it could still be enough to get the child out of the abusive household.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 12:26 AM
1

I believe I managed to make my point without being rude, yes.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:48 PM
1

I said you don't have the authority to dictate what other people should and shouldn't do, not that you can't express your opinion
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:41 PM
1

You don't have the authority to dictate what we should and should not do.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:12 PM
3

Sorry for the hijacking, but I was just wondering. You bring up the patriarchy, do you care to elaborate on your views? What parts of a patriarchy would you believe exist? - where and how is this shown? Gonna try to post to the right person this time
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:59 AM
1

Oh wow, my bad, I wanted to reply to OP haha. Whoopsie.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:58 AM
1

Sorry for the hijacking, but I was just wondering. You bring up the patriarchy, do you care to elaborate on your views? What parts of a patriarchy would you believe exist? - where and how is this shown?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:52 AM
2

General housework does not take that long assuming the two of you aren't complete pigs and causing excess mess. They have a toddler...
/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:36 PM
1

Well there are a plethera of other things: Examples of descrimination Debates about certain topics and news articles Debates about femenism Different types of activism and awareness campaigns. Just to name a few examples
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:36 AM
3

I'm saying the point isn't neccesarily to prove it.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:46 AM
1

This sub isn't about proving some institutional problem.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:44 AM
3

Take one look at the sup here, you can easily find a few houndred examples of this sort of thing happening to men, and you can't find a single example of the same happening to women. Makes you think.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:41 AM
3

I understand that it's anecdotal, but if you have literally 0 datapoints, then even a single anecdotal datapoint would matter.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:30 AM
1

So you can't. You know, one example is still greater than zero, so the statistics aren't exactly in your favor
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:24 AM
3

Find one example of a woman getting punished for consensual sex. I'll wait.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:57 AM
1

You do you
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:15 PM
1

Correct, but that isn't giving up.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:07 PM
1

You speak like your approval is relevant. Ok? It's about closing the gap between genders being up in arms at each other. By assuming anyone who insults women are doing it because of their gender... aight. Your assumption that it was based on action and not genitals is just as baseless as assuming the other way around. But we know it was one or the other. So since the speaker didn't make it clear, i pointed out that it sounds sexist. Something something Occams razor. Maybe you have a very narrow …
/r/MensRights09/09/17 06:21 PM
1

Well, since you won't even try to explain, I'll go through it sentence by sentence and try to find anything even remotely sexist. Obviously she did need it "mansplained", because her stupid ass was giving people bad information. Insulting a woman for something she did - not sexist The very term itself is just more bullshit, feminist victimhood hysteria. Complaining about a movement - not sexist Go visit any computer enthusiast site, programming site, anything tech related tbh, and you'll find co…
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:55 PM
1

Then how does he sound sexist? What did he say that made you think: "He sounds racist"? I tried to understand why you think he sounds sexist, but you just belittle my attempts to understand you. So why can't you just tell me?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 03:41 PM
1

I'm confused, are they enforcing patriarchy, or are they just alling matriarchy patriarchy?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 12:07 PM
1

No reason to read so much into things lol, thats what the femenists do ;)
/r/MensRights09/09/17 11:42 AM
2

Thats... not how the legal system works in Murica-land. Paying 4k to not have to deal with it ever again hardly seems like a big cost. OP did nothing wrong in assuming this was a one time thing, and even contacted multiple lawyers and the judge to make sure everything was sorted.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:23 AM
1

Thats the point
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:02 AM
2

So you would have refused to pay and go to jail instead?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:01 AM
2

You being a man makes you look guilty already, a name change wouldn't change that ;)
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:59 AM
1

Think you're reading a bit too much into it.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:50 AM
1

Pretty sure that was just a joke in bad taste...
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:46 AM
1

I wouldn't say this is much of a problem, tbh. I haven't seen anyone portraying alcoholic mothers nicely, but I could be wrong. My point is, that men usually drink a lot more, at least openly, and so it makes sense to focus more on that. I wouldn't say it's frowned upon either, unless it's a huge addiction or something.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:44 AM
1

I wouldn't say the burden of proof is ridiculously high for men, maybe a bit too high, but stuff like this really needs to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, as it could, and does, lead to tons of innocent sentences. But I totally agree the burdon of proof for women is laughably low.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:41 AM
1

Better to just not bring up the femenists ubless abselutely neccesary
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:32 AM
1

Calling the group outright sexist is the easiest way to make sure your group isn't approved
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:26 AM
1

Wtf are you on about? I asked you why he was sexist, and then showed why I thought that claim was BS. So why was he sexist?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 07:13 AM
1

I think you got that backwards
/r/MensRights08/09/17 04:31 AM
1

Good bot
/r/MensRights08/09/17 04:30 AM
1

Is insulting a women automatically sexist now? Or do you think insulting femenists is sexist?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 04:27 AM
1

She was commenting on him explaining in like 3 different ways why more mAh makes for a better power bank than one with less mAh. How do you know? Can you read minds?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 04:23 AM
2

BlackPill Time: The solution to women behaving like brats isn't going to be philosophy. That's generally been over the heads of most men, let alone most women. Pretty sure women aren't the problem, femenists are.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 04:21 AM
3

but, yeah, by all means, keep gathering every instance of a woman being an asshole *femenist Women and femenists are two very different things.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 04:18 AM
1

Oh right, you're the moron that thinks genital mutilation is rape
/r/MensRights31/08/17 04:24 AM
1

Then let people choose it when they are older.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 04:22 AM
1

You got the numbers wrong there, it's 1231 for men and 65 for boys /s
/r/MensRights31/08/17 04:17 AM
2

I'm pretty sure a lot of that is just part of growing up. If it's really a problem, go see a phycogist, or some sort of life coach.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:02 PM
1

If we truly lived in a rape culture, 'misogynist' wouldn't be an insult
/r/MensRights19/07/17 09:07 AM
7

But you can't objectify women if everyone is blind! /s
/r/MensRights14/07/17 12:31 PM
23

effing horrible FTFY
/r/MensRights14/07/17 12:29 PM
1

Nobody is saying you shouldn't have the right to get your dick mutilated if you want. The obly thing people here are arguing for, is that you (the person whos genitals are mutated) have the choice and not someone else, like your parents.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:55 PM
1

Poe's law I suppose
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:27 PM
1

How would you go about this? Movie stars aren't payed by tge goverment. Should we go full communism?
/r/MensRights05/07/17 10:01 AM
2

Anecdotally, I can say that there is a huge difference in teachers. Sure, you still have the bad apples, but most of them act like they actually want to be there. Although, this isn't US schools.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:59 AM
2

The goverment is very different from institutions. It's a lot harder to refuse an MP because they "aren't good enough for the job" than it is to refuse a teacher or engineer. Even in public fields, it's still much easier than in goverment. Having gone to both a private and public schools, I can personally say that (with one or two exeptions) private school teachers are miles better.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:56 AM
10

Something something double standards
/r/MensRights02/07/17 05:34 PM
7

Really mature
/r/MensRights02/07/17 05:21 PM
12

I think you could use a mirror
/r/MensRights02/07/17 05:18 PM
17

So when femenists day "educate yourself" it's bad, but when you do it it's fine? Double standards much?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 05:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter