| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tinder Scam: Watch OutNo, under 14 is under 14. I think I said 10 above but i looked up the specific law and it’s actually 14. It would matter more to a jury, I suppose, but kids don’t go to juries to be tried. | /r/seduction | 23/03/19 03:18 AM |
| 1 | Tinder Scam: Watch OutAh, you know what you’re right, it did take place in Britain. I just know about the American process, if it’s something OP or anyone else in this thread is worried about. If you’re underage, a setup like the black mirror episode wouldn’t work in a legal sense in most American states other than to make him a social pariah (which was their intent anyway). The charges just wouldn’t stick compared to the kids who are brought in for molesting young relatives or acquaintances. | /r/seduction | 23/03/19 02:11 AM |
| 3 | Tinder Scam: Watch OutYou know what, now that I think about it, so did I! And I’m a woman! I just figured she was the type to get too sexual too fast, so I blocked her. What an idiotic scheme. | /r/seduction | 22/03/19 11:11 PM |
| 3 | Tinder Scam: Watch OutWhile a teenager could still get charged for watching porn of children under 10, he wouldn’t have his life ruined. Most juvenile offenses are sealed after you become 18, and juvies have more of a duty to keep kids alive than adult prisons. Especially for a nonviolent offense, I don’t think his life would’ve been “ruined” per se, just not that great. | /r/seduction | 22/03/19 11:09 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter