TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HahGoodAtBusiness Archive

View 2 posts and 88 comments by HahGoodAtBusiness on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The dark triad traits are just a natural by product that results from men who have the capability (attractiveness/sexual market value) to display said traits. Your original comment is basically about how men who don't have the value to back up said traits have no business displaying them. So per linked article attractive men generally have that built in pitfall of dark triad traits which are a negative/unfair that women have to deal with the same way men according to you have to deal with the ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 05:00 PM
1

A woman can only be her best version-assertive, confident, nice, sane-minded, empathetic, emotionally mature-take all the positive qualities of the word and live like that (if it makes you truly happy) If commitment material qualities don't come to you naturally , don't be. Commitment isn't something every man will just give out it's not in your control, ultimately being the kind of woman men find worthy of committing to is not in a woman's control. We as women need to accept our true self-our b…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 02:48 PM
1

That paragraph still said nothing about your attractive male friend being able to start a whole side business off the backs of lonely rich old women. And that's not down to unequal distribution of wealth between men and women it's down to an unequal supply and demand of male attention vs female attention. That older rich woman could easily supplement what you charge rich men for, for free with most desperate guys. The same can't be said for those rich old men that know they have to pay for femal…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 11:11 PM
1

You literally wrote that you're a "working professional trying to start a side income" in a sugar baby post. If you're the owner and manufacturer of your product which is sugar babying trying to make a side income, that's a whole ass business. If I made an Etsy shop where I sell power rangers to make a lucrative supplemental income is that not a business? You also conveniently forgot to answer as to what level your handsome friend interacts with these rich women because again I highly doubt he'd…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 08:04 PM
1

Yes but is he making a whole side business out of exclusively sugar dating or is he just casually dating wealthy women? Also his female counterpart wouldn't be going halfsies on anything. I also highly doubt any woman would be shelling out that kind of money for literally just male arm candy. Sugar baby women don't have to have sex, be good at sex or really provide any sort of sexual contact. In fact they can just demand money and that's a perfectly acceptable strategy in the sugar baby communit…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 07:24 PM
1

Yes but your exact hypothetical male counterpart either could not or would not have anywhere near the same level of success making money selling boyfriend experiences as you. It's the same thing with your female friends, their hypothetical male counterparts would do significantly worse in all avenues of sex, dating and relationships. And that's the point OP is trying to make and your post history just further proves how easy it all is for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 06:45 PM
1

It's ironic how you even bother commenting in a post about how dating and affection from women is harder for men to get when you have posts about sugar dating. Like you obviously understand women have an easier time with all the options they have in fact their options are so plentiful these women like you for example can even make their company transactional while men can't even get attention for free let alone get paid by women for merely existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 04:28 PM
1

Some women if they are already viscerally disgusted by the idea of a random man they aren't attracted to hitting on them will openly act out in hostility. So with everyone going around in public being a walking security camera with their cellphones do you really want to risk a random chick blowing up on you for offending her by thinking you have a chance and someone possibly films and posts that heated exchange online and boom your an instant predator irregardless of the actual circumstances beh…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 07:54 PM
3

Guys logically should have remorse or fear if they're hitting on women past the point of them saying not interested. Guys aren't trying to get arrested for harassment or something. Cold approaching for average or ugly guys equals possible jail time. Only the hottest guys can successfully cold approach without worrying about it. For most women you hit on in public it's an immediate no like 99.9% of the time so basically you're finding ways to slither around that initial no and still secure a numb…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 01:35 PM
0

Women are approaching men it's just the absolute hottest top tier guys so you rarely ever see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 01:26 PM
5

Lmao once you show you have the capability to have and enjoy casual sex you aren't demisexual you're just flipping on sexual labels like switches when they benefit you the most. Meet hot mini celeb you're not demisexual anymore. Meet average guy you click with on a romantic level now you're demisexual. I was a virgin up until I met my fiance because I couldn't even feel sexual arousal around women no matter who they were or what they looked like unless I knew they cared deeply for me that's actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:29 PM
5

That isn't "radical" though. Learning game or techniques to pick up women is completely fine. The "radical" part came from bad faith redpillers or really just violent Incel misogynists in disguise using places like that as a message and congregation ground for spreading violent rhetoric about women. Even though FDS is a good analogous for redpill none of FDS' ideologies or teachings has ever been connected in anyway to a mass shooter while red pill spaces have served as places for violent men to…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 09:39 PM
2

Also if both sexes face unfairness in the dating market why should I care about one more than the other? Like "ok I agree dating is a minefield for women now can I stop being in my dating desert as a man?". A lot of contention on this sub is on the debates over what sexes lived experience is worse. But agreeing that another sexes lived experience is worse than your sexes lived experience only minimizes your lived experience and does nothing to change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 09:11 PM
1

Yes but we're talking about a Female Dating "Strategy" that emphasizes the importance of commitment. So it's not very pragmatic for obvious reasons to expect the demographic of men with the most access to new hot women (Tall, Handsome, Well Hung Men) to be nearly as interested in commitment as average or ugly men. We're speaking within the confines of what is most strategic when it comes to securing commitment here, yes what your saying can and does happen but sometimes the short, rich, bald, ol…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:57 PM
10

Guys would be better off accepting that there is a clear difference in treatment between really good looking men and average/ugly men. So much time is wasted by guys blaming themselves for their inevitable failures in the dating market when they could just accept there is nothing they can do aside from basic self care, exercise and good manners and the rest is just radical acceptance and patience in regards to what they want may not come there way for a long time fair or not. Also in regards to …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 08:34 PM
6

You should also add in the best action at that. Schlubby guys aren't getting the headache free casual sex or the impromptu threesomes the hottest guys get. Normal guys couldn't even fathom the kind of sexual access the top 10% of men have so for their own sanity and egos they just pretend like all guys get the same treatment or believe the lies these women tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:49 PM
1

If your idea of a HVM is a tall, handsome, well hung man that kind of man is not going to be in any kind of rush to become a parent and stop the gravy train of beautiful women he has access to from coming in. If however your idea of HVM is a completely average man by all measures or ugly then yes a man like this would very much be interested in parenthood, marriage, commitment etc . Because it's not like he even has the option for frequent casual sex with a variety of hot women so his only way o…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:23 PM
1

So a high value man either has to be a virgin or have had one other partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 09:12 PM
1

It's not bad, birth control just gives HVM even less of a reason to commit to one woman when they don't have to worry about children they might have to take care of.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 09:04 PM
1

No it's to get pregnant by one male because they only get pregnant by one male every 9 months. And after that pregnancy they have a baby that needs food, water, nurturing which would more than likely take them out of the mating game for a long time. Just because men have the tools to get rid of competitor males sperm doesn't mean it's going to work and like I said once a woman gets pregnant she's going to take herself out of the mating game to prioritize her offspring. Most women also go through…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 11:43 AM
1

No male sexual strategy is to have sex with as many women as possible. They have shovel shaped penises with a bottom ridge under the heads of their penises that in studies have shown to remove 90% of a competitors sperm. Why would men need genitals to remove a competitors semen if they stayed with only one woman for life? It's self explanatory, men are designed to keep having the means to produce semen so they can always impregnate a fertile woman. Women lose their reproductive abilities eventua…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 10:50 AM
1

Yeah men have shovel shaped penises designed to scoop out a competitors sperm from a female there mating with because they are designed for monogamy. They also never stop producing sperm while women only have a limited number of eggs because they're designed for monogamy. Men also disproportionately look at the most porn and commit the most sex crimes because they're designed for monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 10:28 AM
1

Yeah because Reddit is biased towards protecting female only spaces. It's not negging to be objective about your partners looks. Your partner realistically won't be the most attractive person you can possibly get. But for FDS this is an absolute necessity. FDS has no problem being brutally about everything else about men why would they stop at their partners looks? I find it funny how you're genuinely concerned about my partner but you don't care about the men who might end up with FDS women who…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 12:19 AM
1

Yes I need commitment because I'm an average guy that can't get consistent sex or attention from women other wise. Commitment also isn't the only way to get love or romance plenty of women can't just sleep with any random guy they need some sort of connection. So their you go sex, romance, love all in one for a HVM who doesn't want to commit. I already said it's FDS women that have thoroughly proved their shallow so expecting them to honestly care about things beyond physical attractiveness is g…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 11:13 PM
1

I did absorb what you said did you read how I talked about how shallow FDS women are? Why would shallow women who make posts about how to avoid small dicked men actually care about personality? They would definitely next an average looking average dicked guy who met every other FDS tenant. Every average or ugly man has to settle to some degree they literally don't have the sexual bargaining power to get exactly what they may want. Life is full of compromises. She's also only my first and only re…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:45 PM
1

Nope I'm not tall, probably not endowed enough to meet FDS standards completely average really. I literally know plenty of guys who are very good looking that have never settled down. All the average or ugly men I know or am friends with or married or in a relationship. Isn't that a funny coincidence? The hottest men I know are still playing the field while the average to ugly guys have opted out for long term commitment. FDS is an extremely shallow sexist subreddit with posts about how to tell …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:04 PM
1

Lmao FDS literally has a whole posts dedicated to body shaming men and your making this my fault. You're totally brainwashed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:40 PM
1

Lmao just look up small dick on FDS and seen how many of them make posts unanimously agreeing small penises are low value.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:35 PM
1

Yeah he acts like that now but we'll see how long he keeps that up. Even lucky FDS women that land HVM men who are tall, handsome and hung are always posting about this new red flag to look out for or asking for advice for assessing their partners behavior. That's because they know it's only a matter of time before he does the things attractive tall well hung men do which is bed the hot women they have easy access to. Even when their strategy works it still fails because they get supposedly exac…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 02:37 PM
1

Practically every man does and if you don't understand that you don't know men well enough. Why do you think nearly every guy watches porn despite being in a relationship? Because the plots are really interesting? Deep down they want sex with a lot of women it's just too hard for average or ugly men to get that. But for tall handsome well hung men that are the high value men FDS wants so badly they have no problem making their lives real life pornos so they have no need for only one woman. No on…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 02:22 PM
1

Yeah well tell FDS women all that because they need to hear it
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 01:40 PM
1

It's not insecurity I can't change the way women act towards average men so I just fall in line with the role I have to play. It's no different then accepting that if you're really short the NBA is just not in the cards for you. See what I'm doing? I'm accepting reality. That's why I understand the reality of the pure waste of time it is for FDS women to expect commitment from the hottest guys. Reality doesn't work that way. Nothing you wrote even begins to explain why all the average men I know…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 12:14 PM
1

You don't have to buy it I'm a wholly average guy with nothing inherently special about him. But I'm also engaged. Wow! An average guy who can't get sex or meaningful attention from women otherwise is only interested in monogamy? That's so rare. Even my fiance is living proof of what I'm saying. All the guys she was with that were way hotter than me curved her. The ones that were too ugly never had a chance and I'm right in the middle. It's not a coincidence those hotter guys kept it moving and …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 11:51 AM
1

All the extremely handsome and tall men I know either directly or indirectly are all still single while all the average or ugly guys I know are married. Hmmm I wonder why? "If you are a HVM who is sleeping with a lot of women at the same time I don’t think you are really high value or even a man. That’s what boys do. I’m a man and enjoy deep personal connections that can only be found in longer relationships." Guys that I've met that actually get consistent sex with gorgeous women don't talk lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 11:36 AM
1

That's where the it's a bad strategy part of my post comes into play. FDS women won't settle for average men because they meet all their other relationship criteria they want the whole package top to bottom. And the guys who fit the physical archetype of high value for FDS are tall, handsome and well endowed. These men don't care about commitment so unless FDS changes their idea of what a HVM is to them their strategy will never work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:55 AM
1

The vast majority of guys with actual access to consistent sex with many hot women don't care about the things you're describing. These ideas make sense through the lens of an ugly or average man. But a HVM who is tall, handsome and well endowed is too busy enjoying the perks his high value offers him to even ponder legacies or fatherhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:48 AM
1

" A world where women vet-out bad men and gravitate towards the 'nice guys' who are goal directed, earn well and do not sleep-around." The problem is HVM to FDS are tall handsome well endowed men and these guys don't act the way you're describing they have no reason to. So this strategy actually doesn't work unless FDS compromises mostly on the looks part of their standards but then the guy won't be high value to them anymore if he isn't a tall, handsome well endowed man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:37 AM
1

I'm basing this off the actions of real High Value Men with lots of access to women. Of course you prefer monogamy when you aren't a tall, handsome, successful, big D guy with women constantly hitting on you. You more than likely like most men couldn't get the sex actual HVM have access to even if you tried.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:55 AM
1

Look you have to stop acting like I'm talking about you or all women instead of exclusively FDS women. FDS women are the women who want the most attractive successful men which are the most high value men. These men on average don't care about commitment because they don't have to. Again that is the dilemma for "FDS women". They want high value men which are the most attractive successful men but these men don't want FDS women at least not in the way FDS women want these men. FDS women need comm…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 02:21 AM
1

Im glad your lifestyle works for you but other than acknowledging men ideally prefer sex with different women it has nothing to do with my post
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 01:55 AM
1

Yeah this post is about FDS women and most would never go for your relationship dynamic. In fact I would bet they would call you a pickmeisha or something for letting your husband sleep with other women. You saying most men want to have their cake and eat it to proves my point about men biologically wanting many different women. It's just men who are high value (which is tall handsome attractive men) have access to plentiful diverse sex. Most average or ugly guys don't have this access so they s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 01:36 AM
1

No my suggestion is "FDS women" stop being shallow and seek commitment from average men who are way more likely to give them the commitment they so greatly desire. But see average men to FDS aren't high value so thats where the dilemma I made a whole post about comes into play.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 12:54 AM
1

You can't be committed and have mistresses that will never make sense so your point is flat out wrong. You've already admitted that high value men aren't capable of commitment since they will seek out mistresses on the side. Take the L.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 12:52 AM
1

They can't stop high value men from doing high value man things which is sleeping with many hot women I'm not arguing that FDS is trying to control men. What I'm saying is FDS women expecting to find commitment in the hottest most successful men is a bad strategy because it's extremely unlikely to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 12:50 AM
1

Commitment isn't having mistresses dude just stop. You without a doubt have the lowest IQ take out of any other commenter here. Literally my whole point is FDS women can't make a high value man commit and you respond to that by saying high value men don't commit. Like thanks for agreeing with me I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 12:39 AM
1

No they want commitment from men who have the best shot at having sex with as many women as possible. Those men also happen to be the hottest most successful men. So expecting to find commitment oriented hot successful men is a bad strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 12:00 AM
1

That's basically the same thing as me saying high value men don't want to commit. Unless you think commitment involves tolerable levels of adultery.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 11:53 PM
1

"They aren’t going to get that having meaningless sex with many women. It’s why the high value men have harems and mistresses rather than just jumping from woman to woman." Bro you can't come back from this you literally just said the whole point of my post. Commitment isn't having mistresses.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 11:39 PM
1

"They aren’t going to get that having meaningless sex with many women. It’s why the high value men have harems and mistresses rather than just jumping from woman to woman." That isn't commitment, you just proved my point. High value men don't want commitment which means just one woman for every need. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 11:35 PM
1

They are perfectly happy being alone but have a whole subreddit dedicated to whining about men? You know their being unrealistic which is why you ignored my example of unrealistic dating expectations with ugly short rich men thinking they can use money to get genuine sexual desire from gorgeous women. FDS women desiring to find commitment oriented HVM is the same shitty odds wise of happening as the balding rich manlet hoping to find genuine love/sexual desire from supermodels. It's very unlikel…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 11:16 PM
1

Theyed tell me not to worry about a radicalized subreddit that dehumanizes men. Would you tell me not to worry about radicalized Incel subreddits dehumanizing women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 10:11 PM
1

Found the FDS poster.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:31 PM
1

Because most FDS users are basically female incels who make disgusting radicalized posts that paint every man with the same derogatory brush.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:19 PM
1

Yeah and i'm a fat balding manlet looking to get a hot young woman to genuinely be sexually attracted to me because I'm rich. Think I have a realistic chance of that ever happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:18 PM
1

So you're a successful physician that wastes time on a debate subreddit geared towards men and women who debate online about the dynamics of the sexual/dating marketplace. It sounds like you already won at life so why even post here? Most people who post here have had and still have bad experiences with the opposite sex so they debate about the inequities here. People in happy stable relationships have no logical reason to be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:14 PM
1

That's the paradox I'm talking about they value commitment so highly but they're so shallow they seek it out from the pool of men least likely to be inclined to give it to them which are the hottest most desirable guys. I doubt most men want casual sex forever but FDS women don't have the patience to out wait the desires of tall, handsome men so they opt out to be angry on the internet about it instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:10 PM
1

There's no way to verify if those men are actually high value which to FDS women is tall, handsome and well endowed. So you could have objectively average men giving their predicable two cents on how they don't view sleeping with many hot women pragmatic but it's easy to deny wanting something you could never get anyway. I'm salty for giving realistic takes on how sexual/dating dynamics benefit the hottest men the most and because of that obvious fact they are less inclined to want to settle dow…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:03 PM
1

Yes but can you actually get multiple 10/10 hot women to consistently have sex with you for long periods of time? And if you can't it would make sense that you would seek out a long term relationship with one partner instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:33 PM
1

You can keep telling yourself that tall supermodel looking men with big schlongs and great jobs are fighting tooth and nail to marry one woman. I don't have anything beyond anecdotes to prove my point but common sense alone should dictate these men have the leverage to get what most men biologically want which is sexual access to many hot women. I'm not salty at all what you're saying is equivalent to a rich ugly man honestly thinking he can use his money to make women genuinely want sex/relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:24 PM
1

Yes but are those men tall, conventionally attractive, well endowed and good earners? That's what a HVM is to FDS women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:15 PM
1

Many average or ugly men don't want to sleep around forever HVM who have easy access to sex more often then not see no benefit in settling down. You have to remember FDS women are very shallow so their physical ideal of a HVM is a tall, handsome, well endowed man who makes good money. You really think a guy like this is sprinting to get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:13 PM
1

FDS' delusion about HVM makes them think they can willingly get a tall, handsome, successful man all to themselves. This of course isn't how reality works.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:11 PM
1

Most tall successful attractive men are married? I kind of doubt that even with no data to back it up. Just common sense. FDS women want the whole package. Tall, handsome, big D, six figures. These HVM rarely settle down.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:08 PM
1

Why are you even talking about non FDS women when this post is about FDS women? Some men may very well prefer long term commitment but it's very likely those men will be average or ugly and not very attractive which for shallow FDS women is an obvious prerequisite to being a high value male. But the thing is attractive high value men have options and are way less likely to settle down then average or ugly men. And it's not a bad comparison I made with playing basketball with closed eyes FDS' "da…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:03 PM
1

Men watching porn is their attempt at circumventing their poor hands in the sexual market place. Most men biologically want sex with many women this is just a fact. And those men that have the most access to this opportunity are the hottest men and with FDS being a shallow ideology they want the hottest men. You see the paradox? They want hot men who have the greatest access to sex to be interested in only them. Life doesn't work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 07:15 PM
1

Yeah and I'm sure most men think the idea of having no strings attached sex with a variety of hot women is disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 07:11 PM
1

Yes but most men are biologically inclined towards polygyny. It's just most men aren't good looking enough to make that desire a reality. The high value men do have the means to do this and most likely will more often then their average or below average counter parts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 07:03 PM
1

Yep casual sex with many different hot women is boring. Thats news to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 07:00 PM
1

Yes but see most men want to procreate with many women but they can't because they aren't good looking enough. Attractive men obviously can procreate with many women for obvious reasons. FDS is a shallow subreddit so it's logical to assume they don't consider average or ugly men high value. It's also logical to assume they would see a highly attractive man more high value than an ugly short man even if the ugly short man wanted to commit and the hot man didn't. See FDS women want an oxymoron lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 06:59 PM
1

I highly doubt FDS women are losing sleep over balding fat losers who aren't going anywhere in life. I've seen countless FDS women posting about small dick energy and calling small penises low value. These women are shallow their values are shallow so when they talk about 'high value" their emphasis for "high value" will be mostly centered in looks. I don't doubt they have had one ugly loser curve them at some point but there's no way they consider ugly losers as a whole high value nor are they …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 06:51 PM
1

Yeah but the odds of FDS women getting these men are pretty low unless you think handsome tall successful men are just tripping over themselves to marry one woman when they have several different women offering them no strings attached sex whenever they want. I could be a basketball player and my strategy for playing could be shooting with my eyes closed. I'm sure I'll make the shot eventually but is that a good strategy? No. That's why I think it's funny that FDS calls dating a strategy while e…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 06:45 PM
1

Yeah eventually they most likely end up in LTRs but we can't determine how long that takes for HVMs to reach that point and I doubt it's anytime soon. And FDS women would not have the patience to wait around for a high value male to stop enjoying the benefits of being high value and commit to one woman anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 05:54 PM
1

"I'm not complicating anything. You may not be aware, but men are human beings. Humans are social animals, as such they have a biological need for interpersonal intimacy with other humans beyond sex and sexual intercourse" HVM can get interpersonal intimacy and sex from many different women commitment to one woman isnt the only way to access these things especially if you have many options. "You can't claim BIOLOGY, then ignore other biological needs that humans have. Humans, which includes male…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 05:49 PM
1

This isn't my understanding this is literally how FDS operates. They are shallow women with shallow desires and shallow women want tall rich attractive men to commit to them. But tall attractive men have options and don't want to sacrifice all those options for just one woman especially since men are biologically programmed to want sex with a variety of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 05:12 PM
1

Because you're needlessly complicating a simple premise. FDS actually values men for the most shallow of reasons hence why I've never seen a post proclaiming the benefits of dating a loyal 5'2 gas station attendant. Biological desire is the most shallowest of premises which is why I've concluded it's their main barometer for actually gauging a man's value. The hottest most successful males who want commitment are their mythical HVM. But like I said attractive high value men most likely will oper…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:58 PM
1

It's not negging to want a tall muscular successful man that's called the reality we live in. Most women would choose a tall ripped CEO over a short ugly janitor. That's just human nature. FDS has a hyper fixation on this because an attractive successful man has more value to them then an ugly short unsuccessful one. Even if that attractive successful man didn't want commitment he still has more value to them than the ugly short guy that does. That's where the bitterness comes in because they wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:31 PM
1

Yes but HVM to FDS women are the most attractive successful men. Are you telling me on average real genuinely attractive successful men want commitment to only one woman? Next you'll tell me that you can get a woman to love you by being rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:24 PM
1

Statistically most men biologically speaking are programmed to want to spread their seed. The men that ignore this desire most often also just so happen to be the ones with almost zero opportunity to do so. HVM have the most opportunity to fulfill this desire because HVM are most often the most attractive successful men in FDS' eyes and those men get the most opportunities to spread their seed so strategy wise it makes no sense for them to give that opportunity up for one woman while their still…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:22 PM
1

Yeah and I'm sure if they were given a magic wand that let them have sex with any hot woman they wanted they would never use it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:12 PM
1

Yes but if you're handsome as well you're exactly the physical/financial type of man they want the bitterness comes into play when you're not also into marriage or long term relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:07 PM
1

So a 5'2 trailer park redneck is impregnating many different hot women? Men at large aspire to have sex with many beautiful women as evident by the porn epidemic that disproportionately effects men. No FDS women genuinely want the hottest most desirable guys all to themselves and then get mad when those men want to sleep around as if FDS is allowed to fulfill their biological drive for commitment but the attractive successful man is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:03 PM
1

Yes but FDS ideology for what a successful dating strategy for a woman is operates off of biological need not things like religion or values or family. So if a woman can procure commitment from a High Value Male it's good because its meeting her biological imperative of having an attractive successful man around to take care of her. FDS values attractive successful men not short ugly janitors. So this paradox is created where they want commitment from one attractive successful man but most attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:58 PM
1

Yes but this post is about the inconsistent logic used by FDS. So with regards to that a HVM to FDS=attractive successful men. If we're being honest with ourselves here most attractive successful don't want commitment and it's not by coincidence it's because biologically men are hard wired to want sex with many different women it's just most men aren't attractive or successful enough to make this goal a consistent reality so they opt in for long term relationships. Actual HVM don't have to do th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:52 PM
1

But see why did that man get to impregnate so many different women? It's because he's high value. FDS operates under shallow caveman premises but sex based biological desire operates under the same premise and FDS calls women who get their biological desires met successful. So men who get their biological desires met are successful too by this logic. And men who get to have this biological desire met the most are most often the most attractive successful men. And again FDS women are most attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:46 PM
1

I think it's more wishful thinking that they can trick actual HVM into long term commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:40 PM
1

No the point is the HVM have the choice because actual HVM are attractive successful men. Show me FDS women calling short ugly janitors high value. So again if these women pine after the HVM those HVM naturally have many options because their HVM. And again men are biologically hard wired to want to spread their seed so for a HVM mans dating strategy to benefit him in the same way an FDS women's strategy benefits her it would have to involve dating around. FDS women call commitment a high value …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:35 PM
1

Yes exactly High Value to them is a man that stays committed right? Do these women want commitment from a 5'2 gas station janitor or a 6'2 handsome CEO? Obviously the handsome tall CEO and for the CEOs own dating strategy would he think commitment to one women is the most strategic/beneficial for him? I highly doubt that. See High Value Men to FDS are inherently the most attractive and successful but those men on average are not commitment oriented because they don't have to be. So to even an ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:27 PM
1

Well for starters I would argue if most men were given the option between a long term committed relationship with one woman versus sex with many hot women they would prefer sex with many hot women and I think our growing porn epidemic that disproportionately effects men kind of proves this in the absence of concrete data. Also I worded my post to say that it's a woman's biological imperative to want commitment from a High Value Man for "her or her and their offspring" so child rearing doesn't ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter