TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hallowbin-Skin3329 Archive

View 0 posts and 213 comments by Hallowbin-Skin3329 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Your opinion we can disagree, I don’t even think she should have custody, you shouldn’t have kids if you can’t give them and yourself the basics
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 03:52 PM
3

No I disagree with him because he still has custody, though I believe people who don’t want to have anything to do with children (regardless of gender) shouldn’t have to pay child support I won’t help a cause with someone who actually cares for the child paying if there isn’t a small difference in his and the other persons income. Don’t care about alimony, but if it is being payed there is a big enough difference in income for one of the two to be important Also, don’t blanket women cause until …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 10:07 AM
2

Wait why? If you can only depend on yourself in a situation then learning defense is good, the law is rarely quick enough (though you probably should be trying to leave)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 09:58 AM
1

I wasn’t asking someone else’s views on it I was asking yours, answer the question Also, while a) if you believe someone to be unable to be honest about cheating (or finding it from those around her) why do you believe the n-count you are given? Do women like men having casual sex or not, either it is irrelevant as there are a lot in both groups, or they are conflicting and one is a lie. Also, no not no matter what, men may be less likely to get something in a marriage, but if they aren’t the fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:26 AM
2

A) What do you think of men who have a lot of sex? B) I don’t agree with that assessment as having a lot of sex literally means someone enjoys sex to me and whenever they were having sex a relationship wasn’t seen as important You can judge however you like and I will probably believe you are wrong, you sound like you are adding to what she is doing rather than drawing from examples of what she has done, as you have no examples of what she has done If someone hits another person for x reason it …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:25 AM
4

Ignoring the highly important fact one is the active harming of another person(assumed to be unjustified or there would be nothing to judge) and the other isn’t, Judging someone from something they have actually shown the capability or willingness to do is justified, if it’s the thing you are worried about that they have shown the capability of doing, What you lot are worried about never seems to be something they(the specific person you are judging) have actually done, so it is obviously not ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:12 AM
1

Waaaaaiiittt, men being too thirsty gives women a big advantage in getting sex and a slight advantage in getting in a relationship. Duh, no motivation to do anything means, you aren’t getting anyone to do anything. Also some of you are doing something wrong, you are too big a group for none of you to have done something wrong. Women definitely have an advantage but I disagree with the redpill at a base as it functions on seeing women as a) homogeneous and or b) worth little than their sex parts …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 06:06 PM
2

Doesn’t help that a ton of you completely invalidate women as people, like non of your not hateful speak escapes to mainstream so you are viewed as antagonists I can see it getting tedious like, some of you are certainly having terrible experiences, so you should exercise more caution But the type I don’t like is “Women are the gate keeper of sex to every thing that goes wrong for either side is her fault” No it’s not, depending on what it is it is everyone’s fault If either group specifically w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 01:31 PM
1

Thx, besides certain posts I am here with the expressed purpose of arguing with you, as is every nonpilled or blue pilled ppw, Most of us are literally only here because we disagree with you all so why in the world would we walk up like, yup you right!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 01:17 PM
1

No, I don’t respond with “I’m not like this” unless it’s asking me a specific question, I just argue with people regardless of wether or not I fall in a box Like I’m definitely a looks over personality person with interaction But I also don’t like interacting with people so they might as well look good
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 01:06 PM
1

Nah? I’m fairly certain some ppw fall neatly into some of the stuff you say will talk about and then explain to you why you’re wrong about why they fall there
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 12:58 PM
1

Hmm, I don’t get that, doesn’t apply for me bruv
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 12:53 PM
1

How unfortunate, now it’s hard to tell what you mean as I read the last part and it’s hard to tell if you wanted to be around her all day every day(which I can see why they’d pull away) or you just wanted regular interaction (which I don’t get)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 12:47 PM
5

I know Omegle, I don’t trust other people enough to use it regularly but it certainly would be entertaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 12:30 PM
1

You realize, not every woman is the same right? Also no, if my partner spends little time with me I break up, I need regular interaction (long convo or something every three days, doesn’t matter who initiates ) or it feels like they don’t want to be around me
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 12:22 PM
7

That is such a huge and stupid generalization. Do not use the word all. It is way to broad a stroke for it to ever be accurate. (Unless you are using all in reference to a group being that group) On to actually answering your question, probably not? No one I know talks about it Also, orgies and gangbangs aren’t nearly as common as what you seem to think, as it seems to be an “everyone is doing it” thing for you I don’t know your bar for not promiscuous but if you are from a Muslim country wester…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 03:02 PM
2

Some people give off certain vibes, while I don’t think people should be calling him a misogynist he is giving me bad vibes. So if you think bad if him from the get go you aren’t prone to caring what they are saying. But I don’t really think he should be called a misogynist as I haven’t seen anything else he thinks or has done so I will assume he isn’t It also diluted the point of the word
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 02:41 AM
1

What do you want exactly? To eliminate child support or abortions?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 08:55 PM
1

Some are fine some aren’t, they aren’t a group that thinks the same or align one way like a lot of the group (that are arguing against women) here seem to think about women
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 03:46 PM
1

Who knows, if anything for that type of person it’s probably because they aren’t going to be dating cheating women and misunderstand always support eachother
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 03:42 PM
1

That has very little to do with my original statement or the opinion I expressed
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 03:31 PM
1

Nope, it’s trying to say something like “x is better cause x and this should be applied to anything outside of my personal romantic preference” that is a phobic/ist person
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 03:26 PM
1

Yup, you are confused so I won’t continue responding You didn’t even read(or you are being purposely obtuse/ misinterpreting) what I’ve said On top of that it sounds like you are applying opinions I don’t express to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 03:23 PM
2

Are you confused? You can say your preference You shouldn’t be spouting off phobic/ist reasons for them like they are highly applicable facts or can be used in anything other than a romantic relationship When you do that you are actually phobic/ist
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 02:53 PM
4

Dating preferences are rarely -phobic or -ist in and of themselves and I don’t believe those terms should be applied to dating preferences or people with such dating preferences that come off as such. It’s only a problem when part of the reason is that and you spout it off like a fact, or applying them outside of romantic relationships You don’t need to justify your preferences and depending on what it is doing so is the reason you are being called some form of any of those above as you probably…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 02:44 PM
3

What exactly are your friends doing if you care about birthdays?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 01:29 PM
2

Why are you trying to solve it when relationships are useless? Like, what practical reason is there to solve it if you have interest in sex more than you do in relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 01:25 PM
0

But fds are incelstm ? What are you talking about? Half the things in fds for the reasons fds people put them there is somewhere on a scale of inceltm from very light that it’s fine to holy crap these sexist pieces of shit can’t shut up about the group the obviously hate this is hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 01:15 AM
3

Why would you want to date someone’s house plays those games? Joking sorta- If you think every woman plays those games why even attempt to have sex if you are so scared? But seriously only to those interested in dating, are you fully aware there are those who will not play the no means yes, game? This isn’t important if you won’t go after them, stop the desired reaction you decrease the action, though it tends to take a long time I don’t know where you are but anything that implies that has piss…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 03:36 AM
0

Well if you asked why they get blamed for stuff if the “normies” use a word in x manner and have no reason to stop using it in x manner then it goes to everything until there is a reason otherwise, unfortunate sure but it’s gonna take a bit longer than a second for it to stop Ie, x is bad or associated with bad, there is no motivation to not associate it with bad (people will eventually stop cause there’s debatable to associate with bad as well) But until people stop incels are related to anyone…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 03:08 PM
-2

Probably cause the majority of seen incels who claim to be incels call for murder/rape/genocide or are just generally shitty They might not all be shitty but if you can hate feminism for extremist(who aren’t the only ones talking/seen a lot of other people are actually calling out extremists usually too) There’s no reason for others not to dislike self affirmed incels, who generally aren’t good people(when they are practically the only ones ever seen) There’s also the fact that incel stopped gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 02:21 PM
1

What? Oh, there are too many people for me to be sure so while I don’t know anyone who has that as their bar someone could exist. Prolife probably doesn’t want an abortion. I don’t see what the rest of that has to do with what I was saying originally but I think I agree with your general point
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 12:11 AM
1

Nooooo, but we can’t guarantee!!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 10:09 PM
2

But not impossible
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 10:02 PM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 09:53 PM
1

I mean, I agree with you but who knows, people have different limits
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 09:40 PM
2

No? Abortion in and of itself is so someone doesn’t stay pregnant on top of the other issue, it’s not worth the suffering to be pregnant. Is a baby more valuable? Depends, specifically to the person who is pregnant or doesn’t want a child you would have to ask them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 08:10 PM
2

I think everyone should be able to have a financial abortion Not everyone wants kids, the rates for women who are prolife ie don’t like abortion at all Abortion also can be incredibly invasive so abortions existence doesn’t mean women who don’t want kids won’t give birth Edit-changed is to can be
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:52 PM
1

Okiedokie then, Still sounds like you just want to piss off women
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:35 PM
1

Ahh, great, I’m not gonna risk it but yeah it’s stupid to argue if there are no mods to as the influx of dumbassery is general posts has shown
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:34 PM
1

Okiedokie bud
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:33 PM
3

Uh? Are there men who want kids? Are there men who don’t want kids? At least one of those is a biological imperative (which is the only thing you could remotely argue would be a reason to make a mass generalization of either gender, though I still disagree with it) Of course not all women want children, or at least there are things that are not worth risking in order to have a child
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:32 PM
0

So you want to make women angry? Ok I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:29 PM
1

I have several things to say that I think a mod will delete so I’ll just say, women are far too complex for pregnancy to be the answer to everything so I’ll just stick you as how you apply that to sex and dating
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:29 PM
0

Answer for what? Any questions they ask? Answers to why they are the way they are? Elaborate
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 07:14 PM
1

I can’t even tell what you are on about cause I don’t even agree with your original premise, Your premise doesn’t really show the -group a got something from person a -person a isn’t interested in giving it to everyone so they don’t group b know they give to person a, then expects them to give the same person to person b, usually sparks anger by not being upfront about it but can just be the usual guys only wants to fuck The third parts important I’m seeing the person does something (I don’t agr…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 12:46 PM
0

Okay so you don’t want them upset about it? I disagree, people have a right to be angry at people are are only around them to use them, but whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 12:31 PM
3

Women are all good with guys who are nice, probably won’t date them(that is not a defining enough detail to get much of anything about you and is generally considered basic decency) But so long as you aren’t a nice guy TM it’s unlikely women will dislike you, unless your personalities clash
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 12:21 PM
1

And? What do you expect them to do? A lot of women (I can’t say most) expect to some extent that most guys aren’t interested in them but only to fuck them, even if it’s expected what exactly is it that you want them to do and why?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 12:17 PM
1

What is the point of this comment? Mine was stating, people who aren’t super sexual also get fuckzoned, that shouldn’t be happening and they should have the right to anger yeah? And the guys who fuck zone them are therefore the most disgusting, yeah? Imo every women should expect to be fuck zoned though cause people keep perpetuating men and women can’t be friends and guys seem a bit more interested in fuck zoning people than women Among those who do, (based on op’s logic ) deserve to be fuck zo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/20 12:08 PM
2

Please elaborate cause women without promiscuous pasts get fuck zoned, why does it happen to them? The complaint of getting fuck zoned (became a loud thing, (it could have been present before men started that but that’s when I started noticing it)) in response to friendzoning because regardless of their past or interest the only reason the guy had anything to do with them and thinks of them is to sleep with them, not just promiscuous people are in that situation or are you saying that men should…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 11:48 PM
6

Eh? I don’t view either as needs but it makes sense to fund contraceptives if sex is seen as a good thing to the majority so as to minimize problems, most people will use it so most people will benefit so even if they don’t see sex as a need there is no motivation to not fund them
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:59 AM
11

I mean I’m all for people avoiding sex if they don’t want the issues but birth control has more of a general benefit for both parties than sex does when in use so the presence of them is not likely to decrease unless we have a whole lot of “trust”, or quite a decrease in sex Basically I agree with you But I don’t understand what you are arguing for
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 01:45 AM
5

I take it you haven’t looked at mgtow recently, I don’t care about the second one(it’s fine so far) but the quarantined one has earned being quarantined, fds should be too tho Mgtow(the quarantined one) is probably a big part of why your movements are seen as a joke, same reason y’all hate feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 04:00 PM
1

Something about these questions always confuse me, there is only two directions the weird mesh of ideas that seems to be the redpill ideology will go if it manages to enact itself effectively, I think it comes from the fact that there is relationship advice at all in an iffy ideology that seems to come from someone not believing in relationships? This sub seems to simultaneously think it can get women to have sex less and have sex with them more which is weird? They can definitely even the playi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/20 06:10 AM
1

Nah that sounds like a reason for the man to leave the woman but not much of a fault one way or another
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 05:25 AM
0

Why would it mean all men when the topic of conversation is people who hate people for no reason? So you made a random mistake and decided I felt something but didn’t ask me to clarify, wonderful
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 08:47 PM
1

You are hardly arguing in good faith when you are barely asserting something I’ve said, rather than hate them for being part of a group it should be dislike and avoid them for them being unwilling to denounce a part of an ideology they follow, that I will concede Do you hate Muslims then? their ideology is based in oppressing, killing and owning women, would it be okay to be Islamophobic inherently with every arab i come across. It would be racist-or something along those lines to avoid every ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 01:04 AM
1

I think you might really just want to call me a racist you surely aren’t dumb enough to be unaware of whole groups made for the expressed purpose of being hateful, You also can’t seriously not understand why that question is asked, What opinion do you think United black people under one group? What opinion do you think makes them all same enough for it to make sense to avoid them? You have to think one is there if you want to apply the logic I have, Or do you still not get, that people who are p…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 12:33 AM
1

You don’t understand my statement in the first place, I am in my full rights to avoid anyone based on their ideology, as are you, if they are part of a group based on opinion, they are part of the group because they either agree with it or won’t disagree with it what opinion (besides yours) is there that is putting black people in one group?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 12:19 AM
1

Taking it to its extreme, If someone is in a group that majorly holds the opinion everyone in a group I(or someone else) would be put in(for reasons other than opinions) is all that’s wrong with the world then I am fully within my rights to avoid them, Do you need me to add clarification to that statement? With how much you seem determined to fight, at this point for no reason I think you need a break
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/20 12:02 AM
1

Yeah we will have to agree to disagree, I hate the Bible and several other things I have full access to, I don’t at any point ever need it but I do keep it in the situation it becomes entertaining as even things I don’t like can keep me busy for a bit, And that’s the type of hate I see from fds Hating something and interacting with it shows you can deal with it, not that you need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 07:46 PM
1

What is it you want me to explain? No group absolutely needs eachother(beyond specifics but whatever) To actually answer your question I’d attribute it to a) I hardly knew it existed until recently so I’d say it cause it’s hard to find B) it could be associated with mgtow, which has a very bad reputation with women C) if I was just basing it off of the stuff I read here, women get more out of a relationship than men, there is nothing showing need(I won’t further base it off of my own actual expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 06:08 PM
2

Yeah, it stopped being an argument early in this, literally when he said it was irrelevant that a group already did this it showed his only goal wasn’t even reasoning it was being mad at her, I was curious how long he would go with it tho
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 05:22 PM
1

Not really? There is a woman go their own way(though I ignore it so I don’t know what they do) Fds isn’t the moral equivalent because of their message they are more equivalents because they are both consistently referenced groups known for their undue~ hatred of the other gender Plus it’s not even as though they hate all of them(on either side but fds hates quite a bit less but disparages quite a bit more) ~(if you are of the belief a bad experience with one person makes it reasonable to hate ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 04:37 PM
2

I’m not saying your all bad, I’m saying there are already men who do that, I am also saying people can avoid anyone for any reason they like, I don’t have to like the reason and their reasoning doesn’t make them good or bad unless we have a specific reason While this specific reason isn’t good, to act like this specific reason is a reason to spread it beyond this group seems ridiculous imo I don’t care much, I don’t like them but I don’t think there is a way to eliminate them or people like them…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 04:03 PM
2

Speaking as a black woman, they are arguing that her opinion should be spread to everyone I am arguing that it happens on both sides so it isn’t a reasonable argument, Please explain, I’m not saying what they are saying is good I’m saying does it matter/why make that comparison when you have groups of people known for it We aren’t arguing or laws we are arguing for reactions
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 03:29 PM
3

No one of any group(not part of the group based on opinion) is totally anything, I am of the belief everyone is a threat so work with caution, however don’t act like every being is awful They said- should men hate women and be mean to them because of the women in FDS And I said, you already have groups of people who do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 03:25 PM
2

?? When did I say it’s okay? It’s just there is nothing that should happen if you a) don’t want anything from the group b) don’t regularly interact with that member of that group and c) have a reason to avoid the group I started this off stating there is a whole group who makes it their thing to despise women, your reaction was yeah there are subsets of men that avoid and hate women, that's irrelevant, should other men that find out about FDS , then, hate women and be mean to any women that says…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 01:57 PM
4

You are racist? And? You can avoid any group for any reason you like, your original question was should men hate women and be mean to them because of the women in FDS Not if you were a good person for doing so, You are exaggerating, it’s not wanting to avoid an entire group for a subset greeting them, it’s wanting to avoid an entire group that wants to harm them and or hates them, Is someone good for judging an entire group based on its subsets? No But is there a should? Also no,
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 01:31 PM
4

Good strategy for what? The person we are talking about specifically doesn’t want to interact with (group of people) that specific group is men, so to avoid a group you don’t want to be around yes being mean is a good strategy. If someone is mean to anyone of a group based on something they can’t control do I think they are healthy? Not really, but is there anything I think they should do? Also not really If you interact with a group with no intention of being respected or liked(as the original …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 01:05 PM
3

While a) you say that as though every woman who comes across the manosphere hates men, I’ll ignore that to get to your actual point You should be able to hold basic respect with anyone you have to be around. I’m not saying you should or shouldn’t do anything else I’m just saying that the decision to make certain people avoid you isn’t strange
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 12:01 PM
4

Don’t men tho? Basically? You can avoid any group for any reason, why would mgtow’s “misogyny problem”(I’m fairly certain several people here don’t think it’s a problem but a lot of them do hate women which is the point )exist if hating groups based off of a minority was weird
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 11:35 AM
3

(Do note, Attention from either sex is below a lot of things for me) I prefer attention from my own sex, but I’m also romantically attracted to my own sex sooo
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 11:32 AM
1

“Mgtow is lambasted as a misogynistic hate movement” I dunno that sounds like plenty of reason to hate a group that should overall ignore most things about or relating to women. At least fds( a misandrist hell hole) wants something to do with the group they consistently “lambast” as long as you can dislike them for them for any method of playing the game to their benefit, what it is literally for, people can dislike mgtow for doing something that it shouldn’t have anything to do with but has a h…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 10:02 PM
4

Why is this here? Is this honestly a point of discussion here? Why is fairness to the unborn important?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 12:16 AM
5

Ignoring the general issues i have with the “women who want/have sex a lot are bad” but when men do it it’s fine cause women don’t care(when judging by one of the usual standards that person usually has they should both be bad) group Something I’m always confused about is, isn’t having a lot of sexual women good? I have heard on more than one occasion that ltrs are bad and not worth it, but they do consistently want sex, if they don’t want relationships easy but if they want sex it would be quit…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 03:35 AM
3

Why? Different people want different things and have different values, people also change all the time. let it happen, use your values to decide if you want to maintain a relationship sure, But what exactly works out in this case?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 07:47 PM
1

I’m really unsure on gender identity some days so if I could even without curiosity I probably would cause I’m not always comfortable in my skin I’m ignoring the first part cause you understand that red pill doesn’t always show itself to be positive enough to be worth listening to Taking curiosity out of the equation, would you want to switch for perceived benefit? I’m not nearly attached enough to my gender to say no so yeah, if I could find a concrete benefit in a gender swap I would Imo it’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 04:59 AM
1

Yeah I just take a second, I’m not done yet so I’m just going with the first thing I saw- the chatty thing has to do with less conflicting opinions, it’s just what I’ve observed though so I could be wrong, If you have a lot of loud people framing something like it actually does something good for you, not like it’s neutral, or more actively trying to get people outside the movement in it You (the chatty people in your group) don’t really seem like you are trying to convince anyone of much of any…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 02:00 AM
2

For crying out loud stop being so butthurt about the rape thing it was a basic fucking analogy used to illustrate why we should be understanding about our partner and their traumas! I never fucking said cheating was worse holy fuck take a chill pill or stop debating online because apparently you can't handle adult discussions without freaking out. I’ll stop being but hurt about rape when you stop seeing as an appropriate comparison to show a double standard it is not, it is bad across the board.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 01:27 AM
3

We can understand that having trauma is a reason not to do something, I’m mad you compared it to rape, which is an awful thing, ffs, I don’t think you even understand what I’m saying Either we have to understand our partner won't do X whether it is a sex thing or a taking you on fancy vacations thing because of trauma/bad past experiences Yeah I understand that, you are free to break up with people for whatever reason, if it doesn’t sound to you like they are comparing you to your ex that is won…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 01:01 AM
2

Bad analogy, a) rape is super serious no matter who it’s happening to, b) you specifically said to flip that scenario which would be more rape, knowing what you are talking about doesn’t make it a not bad comparison, It should be if a guy cheated on a woman or some other form of abuse not rape(I have no scale for the seriousness of things beyond rape is the most serious so do what you will) Not doing something because of rape but being mad someone thinks you’ll cheat is not a double standard, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 12:50 AM
2

Not the person you are responding to First of, Did you just equate rape to cheating? Rape is a reason to never do a lot of things that aren’t required or be a functional adult (you would need to specify for it to not be ) Abuse is plenty of reason to not do something that something is now connected to abuse. You don’t actually need a lot of reasons to not do a lot of things it’s specifically mentioning the reasoning that’s weird Now onto why I would break up with them If you associate you doing …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 12:39 AM
1

Sorry? I don’t read the whole of the original comment just what sticks out and I respond to that then edit to respond to what the person is actually saying Just edit what you want into that comment you just made and I will edit this one again
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 12:32 AM
14

They seem to be under the belief that we would leave because the boyfriend treated the ex better, From what I’ve read so far it’s more common that the relationship would end quickly if any of the mentioned things were in the persons dating standards as the ex wouldn’t have had any impact on their standards or them bringing up their ex specifically as the reason not to do something as though you are their ex, some do have the view of it men do but most don’t
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 12:29 AM
2

Responding to what I thought I read: While women aren’t 100% on the same page I also think we tend to connect more talking about our values to the point of weeding out conflict on them consistently enough for when the loud ones say something it is not as much of an issue. I can’t say every or even a lot of women have the same views but I can say that the loud ones trying to spread a view are louder longer and do more to frame it as generally good than I see some of the chattier people here Idk, …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 12:00 AM
2

You can do whatever you want so long as it is agreed upon equal terms for both parties
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 11:39 PM
3

I get this is meant to be the inverse of the girl who was easier/kinkier for her exes but you need to understand that women are never going to sympathize or change their behavior. There is nothing you can say nor any analogy that you can give to change that. It works even less when the majority will either not dump them or will dump for reasons other than being treated better or worse, I don’t actually dislike this comment mostly besides this part I’m just gonna say stuff as I did copy the whole…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 11:23 PM
6

That sounds like you are trying to compare it to a specific something. Which is ridiculous as I could easily do it myself without cheating so I don’t think it’s the best comparison. if you can’t get something from one partner you think is important to the relationship why are you staying with the partner? If it’s not important because it’s important to the relationship but because they did it with someone else it’s unreasonable Edit: actually read the scenario have never been in that situation, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 11:04 PM
1

Then why was one of your points love speech is promoted if you don’t have a problem with it? Making that a law mucks up what hate speech is a) far more importantly b) it ruins discourse No point in talking further (in response to the only fragments part) Yeah, you don’t seem to have an actual reasoning beyond, you don’t want people disagreeing with decisions, And the specific that you are focusing on by making a problematic law for isn’t even something I’ve seen as a big problem. So we will have…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 02:47 PM
1

I’m not sure you realize what I was saying as you pretty clearly don’t seem to understand that promotion of one thing doesn’t mean there is a law against another, also, please explain what you think love speech is if you have such an awful problem with it. How you are defining hate speech is not how things are censored + censored doesn’t mean law, you want to change a societal norm with laws when there are other ways. For some claims absolutely as some claims literally include everyone deserves …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 02:23 PM
1

Not irrelevant when your making a whole law on it, you also haven’t shown how this is equality, if you want to change a societal norm for equality that makes sense if you want to add laws to change a societal norm you have to work in definition at least to start with, You do realize even with what you have said as hate speech there are several other things that would be added to the hate speech list, as it essentially says any form of disapproval/disagreement is hate? You also haven’t addressed …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:57 PM
1

You had for equality in your post, then you said make all verbal forms of shaming hate speech, that second bit is ridiculous as not all verbal forms of shaming are hate speech or even just hate but when you have that first bit there you have to show the hate speech laws against women divorcing and the punishment of having long sentences
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:52 PM
2

I am never quite sure what this sub means by imply, all but say that they want something? Or exist and not deny it to you blatantly (but do deny it) As some see being nice and being friends as implying interest So I extend the possibility to other things that can be implied I might agree with you(kinda) if it’s they did essentially all but say it but I don’t otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:21 PM
2

I’m always iffy in what this sub means by imply no matter what you’re talking about, can you clarify that?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:15 PM
1

See I was with you until the hate speech part, if you normalize something it gets less disdain but that last bit is just ugh. Like normalize men getting divorce for that reason sure(I don’t see much hate for it but I guess you do) but hate speech?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/20 01:10 PM
8

I’m not much for Kpop but all that doesn’t sound like a problem Long hair is nice if well kept, and I am pretty neutral on the rest of the associated descriptors
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 03:57 PM
10

Not nearly as much as rp likes to exaggerate
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/20 05:00 AM
2

I do! I’m super upset I feel short
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 10:23 PM
1

Why are you asking when a lot of the comments are just women lie and arguing with the women that give answers (likely calling them liars) you either don’t believe the answer or you don’t actually care and just want to say something.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/20 09:07 PM
1

Oh this is fun! Worthless but fun! I’m apparently a istp-t? A? I don’t know the difference cause in general they only sorta fit Apparently the emotional part of relationships is difficult for istp so that fits
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 01:52 PM
2

You oh are making a lot of assumptions but lack a number of, sources/statistics
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 04:50 AM
1

Yeah I rrreeaaallyy don’t care one way or another, it’s both of their faults but I don’t care who deals with it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 04:43 AM
1

From my knowledge both get vilified it just depends on what your browsing. My opinion on it is why are they a dead beat? did they never want kids? Did they avoid it? Why should they have to deal with it? Did they want kids? Why are they not parenting? they wanted children. We’re they stupid? I have no sympathy and do not care. You can argue for or against no child support in this case but I literally do no give a flying jack one way or another
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 04:24 AM
2

Yeah it just sounded like you were arguing the man had no fault (really any part or action leading to) this situation. Sorry guess it was a misunderstanding good day
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 01:49 AM
-1

Responsibility is on the woman, the Everyone has light fault, and you don’t believe in taking general responsibility, I don’t see any part of what your saying actually being against that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 01:40 AM
-1

So you don’t believe in general taking responsibility just women taking responsibility understood. While the mans fault in the situation is there(it can never not be there as both parties had to make an active decision for the woman to get pregnant) they just aren’t considered responsible as they don’t “pick genes”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 01:31 AM
1

So it’s everyone’s fault (and more the mans), the woman made one bad choice the man made more than one
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 01:20 AM
2

Good day! Guess I have to get better at explaining what I’m sayingXD
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 12:01 AM
2

I’m literally agreeing that men’s spaces are valuable but saying not every space doesn’t deserve to be called misogynistic, I didn’t start anything, I was stating a reasonable opinion. I agree that a lot of the places aren’t misogynistic but acting like none of them deserve the name isn’t reasonable
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 11:57 PM
2

What exactly is it you think I’m saying cause I’m literally saying some groups earned the title misogynistic, they deserve their space but not every group that is called misogynistic did nothing to warrant it
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 11:38 PM
1

Yeah, I will never understand that, It sounds unfortunate but life gives you cards and you have to play them
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 10:20 PM
1

God I hate the winning in relationships thing, that is such an annoying dynamic. You do you but some people have a harder time removing themselves from a difficult relationship I should also clarify that I meant people who express their desire to be in the given situation where they are on top, why would someone get married if they have a lot of those people around
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 10:13 PM
1

I know that, but if you give that a general advice then why does a) the person who thinks it want to get married, why would you want your partner to always be lesser? And if you are surrounded by a lot of this why in the world would you get married
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 09:56 PM
2

So you agree they are misogynistic, and therefore agree with me, even if you refuse to agree that you agree with me. I at no point said anything about any groups right to exist my statement was literally some groups deserve to be called misogynistic. I stg you don’t read what I type.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 09:21 PM
1

Yeah, uh if you don’t agree that mgtows weird hatred of women is misogyny then I think this convo is a) over and b) pointless as if they aren’t by your definition misogynistic you are asking for other misogynistic groups to rise
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 09:15 PM
0

So, are you disagreeing with me or not. I’m literally saying “there should be men’s only spaces, while a lot of them are unfairly called misogynistic, not every men’s only space doesn’t deserve to be called misogynistic” And you don’t disagree with that, so you should agree with me
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 09:10 PM
-2

Mgtow(the subreddit) is a men’s only space, meant for men, and deserves its label, I don’t consider the Boy Scouts a problem, as they aren’t a group that deserves to be called misogynistic and I don’t understand why they changed it rather than Girl Scouts. What we’re you intending to say exactly in response to me if it wasn’t that every men’s space doesn’t deserve to be called misogynistic cause you came in sounding like you were oppositional to what I said and that would be the opposing positio…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 08:58 PM
0

As cool as that is I’m afab and unsure of my gender identity not male, I love that men have a space to learn useful skills and I hope you keep spreading information about it
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 08:00 PM
4

I hope you aren’t the type to say women never take responsibility cause you seem to be ignoring this is not just the mom’s fault
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 07:43 PM
0

Just an FYI, while I don’t actually know what mgtow does the most I’ve seen from it is them in relation to women is either wanting women to be servants or wanting to take away their rights, while it might not all be like that it doesn’t purge itself of that enough to not be considered misogynistic. Something I don’t understand is why they ever at any point mention women, (besides that one situation everyone is rightfully upset about). That specifically is a men’s only space that earns the title …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 07:32 PM
9

I agree that there should be places for each but I’m not sure I agree that every place shouted at for being misogynistic as a men’s only place was purely because it only had men
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 06:34 PM
3

If your partner always thinks you and or your children are lower than them when legally family why marry them??
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 04:17 PM
6

Why does having a submissive family make them feel crucial when they are working? I can see the importance of Safe spaces sure, but not for relationship stuff, we have made gendered spaces for relationships, fds and redpill aren’t reasonable spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 03:25 PM
3

Yes? As an ace myself I would never have a relationship longer than a week if I couldn’t
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 09:46 PM
1

It’s happening to everyone and has little to do with genders, there is less work and less people willing to work, no motivation nothing is gonna happen
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 06:35 PM
1

I know you don’t have to be sexually attracted to have sex, that just makes it less likely, that’s why I mentioned it first. There is very little motivation for a gay man to be involved in women’s cheating. (It only makes sense if romanticly the possibility is there and even then the motivation isn’t high, it’s just higher than someone strictly gay)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 06:21 PM
1

I know that, but if your social circle doesn’t perpetuate it it’s not gonna be considered
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 03:23 PM
1

Well if your used to hearing insults about people who do it and people guaranteeing it won’t work there is no real point in doing it, really depends on your social circle I’d say
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 03:06 PM
1

What do you mean? Besides that joke I like them quite a bit, I thought saying that would deter them and it clearly doesn’t
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 12:55 PM
1

What do you mean by friend? Cause I’m close with people of the opposing sex. I would say yes as I’d never have that type of friendship No-sorta? I have a person of the opposite gender who has debatable friendship specifically because their favorite joke despite me saying I’d stab myself before I’d date them is still “go out with me” “have a date with me” No No
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 12:23 AM
2

That too, if they are willing to cheat they will do it with anyone they can being friends doesn’t change a thing
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 11:51 PM
3

I’m iffy in the sexualizing cause I don’t pay much attention but anywhere where there is an issue with breast feeding it is too sexualized, it’s purpose is to breast feed, it isn’t necessary to do so but if seeing someone actually do it is a problem then it is too sexualized. Imo regardless how sexualized we should free the nipple! If a guy is shirtless at a beach they’re fine if a girl does it they can get in trouble! While some places do allow it not everywhere does it and it is ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 06:45 PM
1

So you just have an issue with the phrase slutty, m’kay I get you
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:53 PM
1

Have you, read the rest of the conversation I was having? Or really what I said? You said it’s obvious but I’m coming from the perspective that a lot of people say it’s slutty + the person I’m responding to says it’s slutty, regardless of wether or not it is, that can be how it’s interpreted. Though I should have phrased it as too direct as I myself don’t find it slutty, would you like me to change it to that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:24 PM
24

If a man is sexually attracted to women they aren’t gay, if you can’t trust your partner with people of the opposite gender you need to work on either yourself or your relationship, diversity can make for a good friend group. You shouldn’t but can be flirting with anyone outside your relationship you just definitely shouldn’t if someone has a problem with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 03:47 PM
1

What? What does this have to do with anything? What? I can see it being important but not here
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 12:45 PM
1

It does, so yeah I have my difficulties
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 05:35 AM
2

I’m bi with a heavy favor towards women, I just in general don’t date much, plus I have seriously difficulty maintaining my current platonic relationships so it takes a lot for me to be fine with getting into a romantic relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 05:25 AM
2

I feel like if we try to have a baseline of comparable situation we can actually try and understand why things are more likely to go one way over another, even if it’s not perfect by being open to providing info we can get to one that’s close enough to ombré helpful. I should approach more but I’m not interested in people romantically often enough for it to be more worth it to do that rather than let it die
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:59 AM
3

Nope, every so often I see/hear men complain they have an issue with approaching women in general settings as they don’t want to come off creepy. So I was comparing the upset ness of women trying to come off not sl**ty would be compared to that
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:43 AM
3

I think I agree with you then?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:33 AM
3

First off, that’s why I compared it to creepiness in y’all. Second off, if both genders stigmatize it and men still chase women there is limited motivation
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:28 AM
1

I mean in this given situation, that is the exactly the type of person that is being attracted so that result is obvious. But I would like you to explain that then
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:24 AM
5

I can’t tell what you are arguing for. But while I think we agree people are becoming more direct and men are better off if women are willing to approach straight up, in the given situation that the goal isn’t sex however it will be a bit for women to actually be willing to approach men if the largest goal is date and both genders stigmatize it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:22 AM
3

Don’t redpillers fall over themselves to explain how the most valuable thing to a woman is money? And they all want relationships with whoever has the most money? Well you actually have a demographic of about solely that type of woman in one place what do you expect?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:09 AM
5

You say that but with how common it is for men to complain that women aren’t direct enough there’s no way to know any inbetween y’know like sometimes y’all have issues with knowing creepiness?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 04:06 AM
6

I mean, I’ve yet to not hear it talked of with a positive and negative view. Women I know want it to be more fine as well as talking about it negatively. Online I see men wanting it to happen more as well as a very rare few other things. Imo it’s probably seen as negative where I am and is part of the reason it doesn’t happen often.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 03:22 AM
1

I like long hair! It can be put into so many styles! But you have to keep it clean!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 12:26 AM
3

Considering what y’all say about women who get in bad relationships, no anything that forces you to stay with one partner for life is a bad thing Plus the existence of those horrible relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 12:16 PM
1

It took me a second to realize this but I seriously need you to clarify your point, with your word red is sexual , out of all available it is the only one that simulates arousal so it is a sign of desiring to be sexualized to you, but you acknowledge that there are other colors in use, those colors are also not ones that it would be reasonable to consider sexualized as they do not emulate a human emotion especially not one related to being sexualized. Therefore if someone uses make up that you d…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 04:21 AM
2

I’d say there is less of a reason to date. No one has a limit on where they can get to by getting married. There’s less of a reason to be dependent on each other, while it could be people have legitimately become less datable that would be combined with the fact that it is unnecessary to lower any standards that would have originally been set as we don’t need each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 04:09 AM
1

I honestly don’t know what the point of push up bras are so I assume based on what you said a lot of people wear them to be sexualized and some don’t and they like the way they look with it, or any other number of reasons As someone who prefers reds and oranges on skin in general I’d say because it’s prettier But for utility reasons I’d say it is easier to make look “natural”. I’m sure you who acts like everyone who uses make up wants to be sexualized will come up with some brilliant reason why …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 01:05 AM
3

You do it for that? Then for you your purpose in doing it I guess is to be sexualized , people wear it for whatever their reasons are and not all of them are sexual even going on dates, though I’m not sure the other reasons for that one
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 11:42 PM
2

That’s not what I was saying that’s just the thing I found most ridiculous coming from this sub (I kinda ignore misogyny from this sub)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 08:56 PM
3

It exaggerates a lot of it/ acts like women do nothing for anything rather than straight up someone being nice so why wouldn’t I have a problem with the one that jumps out the most
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 08:53 PM
3

I know but if she can get a million dollar phone just cause and it’s an example of an easier life then she doesn’t need a job
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 08:49 PM
6

No, for what reason would women have jobs if any of that was reasonable
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 08:43 PM
1

You do realize a lot of women don’t like bras? I feel like you don’t pay attention to what women say about their bras a lot, even if you Can get them to talk
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 05:53 PM
10

I’m not sure this is as common as you think, I don’t really hear women talk about manscaping.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 05:12 PM
5

What? Explain? What do you think my logic is that you think that is relevant You can’t throw your fist at someone and land it without hitting them. Makeup isn’t inherently sexual, people like it cause it makes them feel pretty seeing as it is worn other than for dates by a lot women it’s use is not just for getting a date
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 12:14 PM
7

What does make up have to do with sexualizing people? It’s not sexual unless someone makes it, plus wearing sexy clothes outside the house doesn’t mean I want someone sexualizing me(besides so) it means I like sexy clothes or I like these clothes on me
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 11:57 AM
2

I’m not sure if you did it intentionally but this sounds an awful lot like men have no self respect if they aren’t in control of everything, including other people, which is the main issue with this statement, and if that’s literally the only way they feel respected they don’t deserve respect and deserve every ounce of disrespect they feel they lack in “necessary” or preferred respect. If you can’t find a way to be respected without controlling another person because society dictates you can’t f…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 05:08 AM
3

If that’s the relationship you want then I suppose it’s possible to be different but equal. No reason for shaming someone for being in an ideology I don’t prescribe to if it’s not harmful.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 01:35 AM
3

You remember how most people remember Hillary if full of crap?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 12:12 AM
5

There’s no point in asking this question if women’s statement on it are trivial, men aren’t women, they can’t say what women want, they especially can’t say it if women don’t know it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/20 12:10 AM
1

Thank you for sources! Jeebus, the other guy refusing to add sources to anything was pissing me off, have a good day, you have plenty of reason to not like feminism I’m just saying, though I’m not a feminist I’m not anti feminist, therefore when it sounds like that is a large part of your thing I’m not part of your group either, And I won’t be, I don’t even dislike MRM activism, I’m just not an MRA
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 02:42 PM
1

Great, you have had good experiences with MRA, and worse experiences with feminism, that’s good for you, You are reasonable, so I don’t dislike you, still will never associate myself with being and MRA more than being egalitarian but eh. Please do add sources, people are complaining “why does no one want to join our movement! Feminism is bad and a scam! Our actually wants to fix issues!” But the only issue I saw MRA talk about when I first had anything to do with it was how bad feminism is, not …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 02:10 PM
1

Oh I don’t find it shocking, which is why I’m not a feminist either, I just dislike mra more than I dislike feminism which is why I’m an egalitarian, who would sooner say I’m a feminist than an mra I think me arguing with this guy confused you but people like him who spout off stuff don’t add sources then massively generalize (some even go to generalizing women as evil) are why I want nothing to do with MRA, I can talk to feminist, they usually have a source and more commonly don’t seem to hate …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 01:19 PM
1

I originally misread what you were saying as you seemed to be weirdly in disbelief about the fact that I wanted stats in general. I wanted sources for the things you were saying To actually have to do with the thing you asked here. My question was about the majority so besides mansplain(which you haven’t explained how it’s a slur which is something else I disagreed with) using those terms and endorsing them You haven’t provided a source for why half your claims are proof feminism is a hate group…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 01:36 AM
1

Literally all of it? You act like just saying things without stats makes your things reasonable when you proposed the stance. You actually have reasonable points but you start this so vehemently spiteful against anyone who isn’t saying they are a men’s rights activist. And you’re lacking in details That first one for example It’s a good point. But if you don’t add details to the others it doesn’t do anything And I couldn’t find a single one saying the idea you have of it is good or that the poin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 01:02 AM
0

Wait, since when are those the positions of the majority of feminist? That’s really interesting if you can give me statistics on them I will leave you calling it a hate group alone (Though I get manspreading and the other one those on the mra sub have come up with femsplaining and it’s for the same reasons mansplaining exist, out of all of those mansplaining isn’t a slur it only applies to someone explaining something to a woman when they don’t have the training/education to be in a position to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 12:39 AM
2

I recognize that the grand majority of your movement isn’t antiwoman, I’m just pointing out something possible It is entirely likely that isn’t the reason. I said it cause the only real interaction with the mrm is this sub men’s lib and MRA and the mra sub just made me refuse to label myself any level of mrm beyond egalitarian Also I am literally arguing with someone who is essentially saying I hate men’s rights, Citing no one wants that how do you think that convinces someone? Like, if I never …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 12:22 AM
-3

Are you calling feminism a hate group? Because while I can see having problems with it I don’t see calling it a hate group. I feel like if you have a movement that has a bad habit of saying everything they(the “opposing” movement that shouldn’t actually be opposing) ever talk about is bs and we are clearly the better movement as they are all hateful and are oppositional to us you will have a lot of people think your movement is in opposition of the more well known movement, which is how you get …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 12:18 AM
-1

(By loud I meant easier to see/identify but mm’kay, not like you have any interesting claims in your original statement that I decided not to nitpick for sauce) Well, the majority of this sub seems to hate feminism, for legitimate reasons so I won’t argue about, but is my main point, I don’t have a problem with men’s rights, the MRA sub full on hates feminism, which if you aren’t anti feminist your aren’t positive on the group, it’s also the first sub that comes up in regards to men’s rights. An…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/20 12:02 AM
0

I feel like the negative perception of mra can come from the similar reason some people rave on about why feminism is awful and useless, you have a loud part of the group that isn’t actually putting forth the main ideology you have a loud part of your group that make it sound like you don’t want mens rights you just want to fight with feminism and that is the only reason you exist or like you hate women and want to denying the existence of women’s issues, I know y’all aren’t like that but I don’…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/20 11:38 PM
3

Nah I’m biromantic they both be Awesome I just wouldn’t have sex with them!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:52 PM
3

I’m all for other forms of affection, there would be literally no point in being in romantic relationships if I was against them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:46 PM
4

A conversation as to why it’s not there, I can’t personally prescribe one as you’d notice if you read the original comment and I think you might be confusing have a conversation before you decide to break up with you shouldn’t ever break up if you talk about it Do you want me to write but break up afterwards if it doesn’t work? cause I’m fairly certain y’all are smart enough to figure that out
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:20 PM
3

I am usually all for breaking up for being incompatible for any reason. But that is only when the issue isn’t one you are willing to go for what I would assume to be multiple moths with the problem over breaking up. Not everything can be solved with a breakup so before breakup is the assumed option talking about it makes sense. If you don’t want to leave the situation immediately then you should have a conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 09:36 PM
1

Thx, will do!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 09:12 PM
5

Have you ever been in a relationship/marriage where your partner was more sexual and kinky with previous partners but not you? (Referring to those stories you see where a husband gets duty sex once a month and then finding out his wife used to love getting dirty daily with other guys in the past) If only one party wants sex consistently and the other party usually isn’t enthusiastic there’s an issue and while I don’t advise breaking up(this can probably be dealt with with a conversation) It is p…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 09:00 PM
3

Yup! Not like I want children. One issue is how invasive the surgery is so maybe not?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 07:50 PM
1

And? My point was about everyone so I know it’s unrealistic. I’m not stupid If everyone has high standards we would have a population drop. And more importantly there would be less people going out with people because they are afraid to be lonely. It won’t happen but it’s how I think it should go
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 04:42 PM
19

Everyone should have standards, high standards, it’s for the benefit of the earth there are less people using resources anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:54 PM
1

Oh? And so is every man? Seeing as we are putting every trait a group has and acting like everyone of them does and shares that trait? Do you not see how bad of an argument this is. There are a seriously limited number of things that one gender can do that the other can not when judged purely on their ability to preform an action no culture or disability etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:45 PM
6

Great, but I asked what this has to do with people who wants to be single. It doesn’t matter if they change, if they currently don’t want to date someone they shouldn’t date someone. Marriage and non platonic relationships aren’t necessary, so why do something you don’t want to do for a maybe that you don’t need
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 09:56 PM
10

What does that have to do with someone who doesn’t want to date
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 09:41 PM
4

If you want an open relationship (you are both free to sleep with other people) have an open relationship. I really don’t see the problem here or why this would be something to argue about, if you just make the relationship open. This sounds like going from a not open relationship to cheating it doesn’t sound necessary in the least considering people are fully capable of not cheating on people. Lots of generalizations too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 03:15 PM
1

This goes both way as certain beliefs are super dividing, especially when among those beliefs are something either side believes is worth getting into a shouting match for
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 12:54 PM
2

I wouldn’t sacrifice anything( I don’t have much stock/reasons to be in relationships) But it really depends on how much something is worth to you. Little things like not keeping a lot of something if it’s not high on on you stuff you like list. A total inability to change is a bad trait and more worth breaking up with someone over than trying to change a few small things, so long as both people are changing to further improve themselves or their relationship and not changing a lot about themsel…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 03:09 AM
3

Yeah, bs, spent too many years with my sexuality to not be pretty clear I’ll date either gender. I’m not even entirely against what I think this article is saying I’m fairly certain there being a general increase it terms to describe oneself as well as actually having the chance to more often helps with that figuring out your sexuality stuff. People keep checking stuff if it has a name and they don’t know what they are so you have a lot of people identifying as bi or les or enby when they are aw…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:32 PM
3

How would you convince women who don’t already intend to have children’s hat having children is worth their effort? As others have pointed out, children are a financial sink There are a number of people who want children but the money and effort aren’t worth it. Without some level of force it’s unlikely there will be an increase in children without something bringing worse debt, If you are having a difficult enough time just getting people to make children how would you also convince people to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 03:20 PM
1

Have a good night! (You made it personal not me ;))
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 05:12 AM
1

What are you on about? I wanted to know why you mentioned her job I don’t see what that has to do with me taking care of her. I was just checking and if you care so much about finances there’s a type of agreement you can sign about how money splits.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 01:21 AM
1

I don’t understand why you didn’t have one in the first place, you seem bitter enough to not trust the person you’ve married. What does her job have to do with anything? Why would I care about that? Rightly or wrongly assuming it is a good way to be dissatisfied if you want any increase from what it was from before the marriage. It’s good you weren’t implying forcing it but really, this is a whole different reason to be divorced. If one partner completely takes sex of the table then both should …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 11:17 PM
1

First off, what are you talking about? Why don’t you sign a prenup if you care so much that cheating is what you decide to do? Second off, Not really, if you can’t satisfy each other/aren’t sexually compatible break up/divorce if you think cheating is a valid decision you deserve every consequence (I’m not sure if you intended it but that last part is almost rapey and is why i want to down vote you(I won’t because the rules), no one needs a reason to not have sex with someone even if they are ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/20 10:35 PM
5

Nope, neither side should cheat, if they are unsatisfied in the relationship they should leave. With your logic if the man doesn’t provide the woman should cheat rather than immediately break up. It also assumes that the woman is dependent on the man and therefore must sleep with him at all times he desires which is a different ridiculous that I will not unpack ( even if you try to)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 11:04 PM
2

Guess we have different views on this (though you haven’t made an actual point)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 10:32 PM
8

Wether or not the person can be loyal no matter the situation(they are capable of loyalty after all) it is justified to immediately break up with them. It is 100% the cheaters fault, they don’t have to cheat nothing makes someone cheat. It doesn’t matter how unavailable the partner is the person who cheats chose to remain with them and did not deal with it. Don’t know about the last one~ if the person asks yes if they don’t not really
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 07:19 PM
2

Eh~ agree to disagree, while I think people should do certain things(all forms of birth control possible) I don’t think they should be in charge of something that there are other methods of taking care of if they don’t want to. But, because I can recognize a fault(and no one’s actual body is being violated) I can leave the issue alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 03:25 PM
1

I mean they should, they would be fools not to, while I’m not for people paying for children they don’t want I wouldn’t actually fight about it as there are certainly reasonable methods of not having children.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 03:13 PM
1

I mean, yeah, but how are you going to regulate sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 03:08 PM
2

But with options that give neither parent financial responsibility(putting them up for adoption) if one parent decides not to they have made the decision to keep the child and the other has not, Sex is not consent to children I could see increasing welfare programs for those with children but only one of them wants the child and that’s decided either very quickly(abortion) or after a long while(deciding what to do after it’s born adoption or one person keeps it and the other leaves) While I pers…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 03:04 PM
7

Some people are against abortion and I have no reason to deny people that choice. They can decide from there what they want to do
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 02:48 PM
2

What do you think my logic is exactly? What sustainable way of jobs bills and otherwise do we have of taking care of people that is similar to what we have with children? Society is functioning if we have children in foster care It isn’t if we have no one working. If you were arguing about taxes for stuff it would be comparable as that’s something I’m for as it usually benefits the person paying them depending on what it is. What benefits are there to children? If you don’t want to do something …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 02:46 PM
3

No one should be responsible for a child they don’t want, can’t take care of child? Don’t keep it if you care.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 02:35 PM
8

I was 16 when I realized it happened but I was also a dummy who ignored people noting that it happened since I was 12, I only realized that they were telling me about it when someone straight up told me someone was staring at my boobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 01:58 AM
1

Seeing as my opinion on people is intolerable, tolerable, and attractive and ugly would fall in intolerable no, it takes a bad kind of bad personality for you to be ugly. There is no point in being with someone I can’t get along with if they don’t even spend money on stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/20 07:57 PM
6

How does this fit the discrimination tag? She doesn’t want to get together with him because he didn’t want the child and is asking for advice. You can’t seriously think that not wanting to get back with someone who left you over such a big issue is discrimination?
/r/MensRights07/10/20 03:00 PM
5

“Killing” female babies isn’t as uncommon as you think. I think India has laws against finding the babies gender specifically because female babies tend to get killed.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 12:19 AM
2

Excuse me? I think you made a typo, should?
/r/MensRights07/10/20 12:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter