TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hamakua Archive

View 29 posts and 3,365 comments by Hamakua on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
371

Social IssuesHamakua/r/MensRights15/05/23 05:16 PM
52

Hamakua/r/MensRights04/08/12 09:21 PM
45

Legal RightsHamakua/r/MensRights10/06/22 07:43 PM
45

Hamakua/r/MensRights19/09/11 11:28 PM
42

Hamakua/r/MensRights07/04/12 04:59 PM
30

Hamakua/r/MensRights21/08/10 01:12 PM
29

Hamakua/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:56 AM
28

Hamakua/r/MensRights06/07/10 04:53 PM
25

Hamakua/r/MensRights28/06/16 05:02 AM
23

Hamakua/r/MensRights20/08/10 02:06 PM
22

ProgressHamakua/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:15 PM
20

Hamakua/r/MensRights21/06/10 02:32 AM
16

Hamakua/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:11 PM
16

Hamakua/r/MensRights20/08/10 02:51 AM
15

Hamakua/r/MensRights17/11/14 09:52 PM
11

Hamakua/r/MensRights19/09/10 06:50 AM
10

Hamakua/r/MensRights16/03/14 08:33 PM
9

Hamakua/r/MensRights03/10/10 02:56 AM
9

Hamakua/r/MensRights21/06/10 04:53 AM
6

Hamakua/r/MensRights12/11/10 06:56 AM
6

Hamakua/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:49 PM
4

Hamakua/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:14 AM
3

Hamakua/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:18 AM
2

Hamakua/r/MensRights02/09/10 12:08 AM
1

Hamakua/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:09 AM
0

Hamakua/r/MensRights22/09/10 06:07 PM
0

Hamakua/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:27 PM
0

Hamakua/r/MensRights18/08/10 03:18 AM
0

Hamakua/r/MensRights17/08/10 09:50 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,365 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

cooldown, by which you mean "wait 30 days before you get divorced after filing." or "you got divorced within the last 5 years, you cannot get divorced again until 2031?"
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:47 PM
9

I've been on this sub since a little before the "first" gamergate. It's never been banned. I've stopped by mostly daily for a quick glance. What you may be thinking of is when one of the original sub mods went leftist/woke overnight and tried to sabotage the sub and locked it down. The other mods petitioned the admins to kick him out and return general power to the majority of the mod team, which the admins did. I don't recall the details and I was never part of the mod team so I cannot speak to…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 09:55 AM
2

"researchers choose not to acknowledge why boys have fallen behind girls." is the truth of the statement. The alarm bells have been rung by various academics since at least 2000.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 02:32 PM
1

Angry Harry (RIP) would have loved this breakdown. He used to do similar back in his day (early 2000s). I haven't read/watched his old videos on the subject in a long while but he found the same thing - that the various ideological agencies fudged the numbers completely.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 06:26 AM
1

This is another paper that reference the original DNA paper. https://medium.com/cregox/is-there-anything-good-about-men-by-roy-f-baumeister-d111ba407de3 That is a re-upload. The original paper via the .edu college link is missing. The original Baumeister paper is over a decade old. The study he references is older than that. I have seen the primary source but do not have a digital copy. I just chased it from the paper from above. It's likely referenced in his book as a source now. I have not rea…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 05:00 PM
7

The only reason why I don't believe this to be true is because the family actually cared enough after the fact to pursue the matter, going so far as to hire I PI. Don't buy it. Human nature as it is would have them make excuses for themselves individually and dismiss him out of hand. Instead of blaming themselves they would transfer any internalized guilt onto the cousin as anger/rage for ruining him. They would not see themselves at fault. People don't work that way.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 12:20 PM
23

There are absolutely people breaking up with their partners over a barbie movie. Have you never been in a relationship with a woman before? They will break up over far far far less than a message in a movie.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 12:52 PM
2

It could be evolutionary biology, it could be the need to feel secure. You wrote the same thing twice.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:36 PM
1

"Why?" Because you cannot social engineer away 40,000+ years of biological engineering overnight. Men seek to be providers and only find fulfillment in that role because to date that's how the species evolved - until very very recently in the last half breath of the species' existence. That's not going anywhere.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:35 PM
-2

You don't understand feminism if you don't think she is a prime example of everything that is feminism.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:15 AM
4

There is no going back but there is a path away from political ideology. Won't happen for a while but it's an open secret in the industry that ideological preaching lowers the quality of games. It's just ESG pressure keeping it there, that and the legions of indoctrinated peons. Objectively the quality is worse and that's why non-ideological games can still succeed in this market, even though they seem rare.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:14 AM
1

"She has been punished enough and will suffer the greatest punishment by not having custody" - some activist family judge, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 10:42 AM
4

My sister has a 3 year old son. She personally experienced being hard-sold on it (US hospital) - I've been an "MRA" for like 23 or so years now and have not kept the core of these views from her so she was well aware of my knowledge base. When she found out her second was going to be a boy she asked me to give her the full run down. I went over everything, pros and cons arguments from both sides and my personal view and the things to watch out for when at the hospital. She essentially needed to …
/r/MensRights19/05/23 10:37 AM
3

Literally, and she used that justification to "women lose their husbands, fathers, sons" - that's her justification as to why they were the "primary victims of war." Literally "Men died, women most affected."
/r/MensRights19/05/23 05:42 AM
7

"Women have always been the primary victims of war." -Hillary Clinton
/r/MensRights16/05/23 11:44 PM
1

You are trying to argue the legitimacy of singular anecdotal agency. What this thread is meant to discuss is broad scope population spanning data. You seem to not understand the statistical issues and generational spanning influences that have brought society to its current state. For the individual, sure, your advice is sound. For solving broad scope problems, it's ineffective. It's like saying if one person could go from out of work bum to a ceo of his own company in 7 years every out of work …
/r/MensRights16/05/23 11:40 PM
13

It's a feature, not a bug. Circumcision in the United states was secularly popularized by John Kellogg. The purpose was to explicitly suppress sexual urges.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:57 PM
1

Someone asked a tangential question in this subreddit less than a day before you did yours. My reply answers your question. I'll just link my reply (quite long as I also convey my sister's story who recently had a son) here.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:56 PM
11

"A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon." -Napoleon Bonaparte
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:52 PM
1

Abandoning is actually not a choice even though you think it is. You are misinformed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kh9wknpHP6w
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:36 PM
2

Because for hundreds of thousands of years women were the choosers. They have the privilege of being able to choose. Very few men for most of human history were in the position to have a choice if they wanted to have progeny. Did you know of all the women who have ever existed in human history 80% of them have progeny alive today? And did you know that of all the men who have ever existed in human history only 40% of them have progeny alive today? Not even the majority of men who have ever exist…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:34 PM
1

For hundreds of thousands of years thousands of generations of Homo Sapiens before you all wanted to procreate and were successful in doing so. You being alive and aware today was from the biological drive you claim to not understand. This is the second part https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kh9wknpHP6w However- people who tend to cite "learned helplessness" ignore a very key component - that unless you remove the pressures of the failure state it won't change the fucking outcome whether people ke…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:00 PM
3

Don't worry, you are only being deselected sexually. They will still force you to pay for their poor choices in life through ever-expanding social programs.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 09:22 PM
3

The reason why the divorce rate is >50% is because of no fault divorce combined with a financial incentive to divorce.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 09:20 PM
7

You are correct. And it's pretty insidious that this is the case. One cannot even as easily discuss the issue now because both one of the major descriptor of the issues (this is the same for NEET) as well as the individuals that fit the core definition of the descriptor itself cannot be pointed to without the dehumanization of these men contaminating the discussion. "63% of men cannot find a date" - "LAWL, a bunch of incel losers." "My buddy has tried and he hasn't been able to find a girlfriend…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 09:07 PM
31

It is a form of mutilation as circumcision results in a few long term effects. Firstly, the part of the foreskin that is removed, some of it overlaps with the area near the glans responsible for sexual pleasure. The entire penis is not sensitive to sexual stimulation that leads to orgasm. The shaft and the head do not have the nerve connections for this purpose. It's just a relatively small area just below the head/glans but before the shaft proper. This is precisely where some of the foreskin i…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:58 AM
3

Erin Pizzey opened the first woman's shelter in Britain. Very soon after she realized one would be needed for men too. When she tried to open one for men Feminists attacked her and her efforts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix5-jqQYU1M
/r/MensRights16/05/23 10:13 AM
2

Glad you appreciated it and even more so that it made your day.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 07:25 AM
8

https://imgur.com/L9Vu4Zo This hasn't been in contention for years now. This is a known observable point in the issue. It's not "up for debate." Women as a whole have skewed standards for men believing that 80% of them are below average. Everything runs down stream from there. Equally they have a highly skewed perception of median earnings in the US.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:18 AM
5

Add to that how shameful it is for a male friend to say how unsuccessful he has been on the dating market to his female friend (who many times is a "potential partner" as well). Insert video of classic interview between male and female friends where it is all orbiters and plate spinners respectively.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 03:35 AM
72

Society and women do not care if men cannot find a stable loving relationship. Society and women only care if women cannot find a stable and loving relationship. "Incel" is a word specifically turned into a tool of derision to dehumanize men using the very same word to ascribe blame to them of something that is almost exclusively not their fault. It's like if society started making fun of cancer victims and dehumanizing them with the word "cancy" in order to alleviate their own "obligation to he…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 01:17 AM
23

Candace Owens is not your friend. She was a crazy kool-aid drinking leftist some time ago but got kicked out of the club when Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn of all people "kicked her out of the leftist club" because Owens was trying to develop a startup and online tech that would "unmask" online anonymity. The queen bees at the time freaked out that their sockpuppets would have been exposed so made Owens unpersoned on the left. Owens being a black female found magnificent success then peddling t…
/r/MensRights27/11/22 04:10 PM
1

You position is no more valid than the person you originally retorted to by your own metrics. I point out (and the medical industry agrees with and disagrees with your position) that a 10% irreversible rate is not low enough to be categorized by those who's entire job is to understand these things to be framed as not "irreversible" because of the high-impact result of it being the case. You are trying to frame the distinction as a "minor correction" it is not. It's a high-impact situation that y…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:20 AM
1

You seem to be reading past the core point of, for example, why doctors require the spouse of husbands in some jurisdictions to also agree to the husband's vasectomy. I can only imagine this as being bad faith because I personally do not presume ignorance.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:13 AM
1

That's a bad faith argument. A revolver with 5 empty chambers and a 6th live and loaded one who's trigger is pulled while pointing at someone alive isn't "not dangerous." This is a case of the high-impact low(er) probability negative consequence being of such a high impact compared to "nothing happening" that the entire act should be categorized as "dangerous" (in the case of the gun) or "irreversible" (as a default in the case of the vasectomy.) - This is how doctors currently treat vasectomies…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:06 AM
10

Aydin Paladin deep dive and statistical breakdown of various perspectives about Male DV and especially how the current systems in society are biased. Good collection of factual examples and studies. (currently premiering at the time of this submission and post).
/r/MensRights10/06/22 07:44 PM
2

I thought in the UK intent didn't need to be proven, which is one of the distinguishing differences?
/r/MensRights05/06/22 05:10 PM
2

The broader irony is how I've heard for decades how libel and slander in the UK are so much more easily proven and enforced than in the US. It must make the legal sector (inside baseball) look very oddly at the specific judge in question.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 04:13 PM
24

Mens clubs don't have crying circles. and feelings sessions. The same thing has happened to many online "for men" portals where if you look at the leadership of the "men's" organization it just ends up being a bunch of Feminists. There is a difference between Men's programs and Men's programs run by feminists. The former is exceedingly rare.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 09:17 AM
2

News on Good Morning America this morning is about an Ex wife being arrested after she hired two 17 year olds to kill her husband. He was shot 9 times but survived.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 01:09 PM
3

I did a deep dive over a decade ago into rape stats in the US, Prison rape instances etc. Broken down more men are raped in the US (a decade ago) than women - apples to apples comparison. The retort? "But they are raped by other men." In the US- at least, if you account for prison populations and the incidence or rape there (according to the UN at the time) it outnumbers the women's rape rate in the US.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 04:19 AM
11

Broadcast you are an MRA across social media in an age where HR in nearly all companies in the west are saturated with man-hating feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 12:46 AM
12

Do you want to commit career suicide? Because that's how you commit career suicide.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/20 12:39 AM
8

Thanks, fixed.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:50 PM
1

Bad liars.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 11:20 AM
58

Literally how the Deluth Duluth model works (US S.O.P. for law enforcement)
/r/MensRights25/05/20 11:14 AM
3

because it's now fashionable for some viral reason. Don't worry, 6 months from now the perspective revealed in this moment of societal introspection will be completely forgotten.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 05:00 PM
9

~10 years ago the wage gap was gospel and every single person outside of a very small fraction of the population just took it as common sense. Today you get laughed at by an entire generation that grew up during that time if you try and cite the wage gap. Sure, the argument is still there - but the refutation is as prolific and common as being rickrolled - hell, today, more so. I have zero doubt this sub was a key player in that happening. That is one battle the sub will always be able to chalk …
/r/MensRights01/02/20 09:36 PM
2

Digg exodus. There are older, but not many.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 08:45 PM
124

Reddit admins are a bunch of white knights. This has been true for at least as long as my account is old.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 04:28 PM
2

Yup. I should have included that after the fact I found out that Sowell was making the same argument back in the 60/70s He is another one of my heroes, however I only read his stuff well after finding AH.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 09:14 PM
3

Yup. I'm on a list on it. It's an example of Reddit Double standards - however the sub is largely defunct. It was at one point in time an active and focused "ally" to "ShitRedditSays" years ago. Essentially back then its primary focus was to attempt to dox as well as downvote brigade /r/mr participants. They had a list/metric to figure out who were the most active MR redditors, to then follow them around and to then downvote brigade them elsewhere on Reddit. The list I'm speaking about is under …
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:26 PM
131

Back in 2009 I gave a similar-ish presentation in college. Got an A on it. There were some dissenting voices in the audience but it went well enough. Teacher was female too. Edit Small bit of fun history. While researching that talk I found and submitted the following. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ch6bc/wage_gap_analysis_2009_consad_department_of_labor/ That was a submission of the Consad Report that nearly got erased from the internet as soon after Obama came into office the US …
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:11 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sLQ0KOcXNo
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:55 PM
2

https://i.imgur.com/KEHUJpX.jpg
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:22 PM
1

Two words Star Wars I wish you were right, but you are wrong, very wrong.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/19 07:29 AM
2

Non-verbal clues? That's how consent used to be conveyed.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 09:15 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veronica_Roth Author to Divergent. You might as well read Cosmo for guidance on masculinity.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 09:11 PM
11

Usually also part It's "just" degrees of reduced sensitivity.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 04:03 PM
2

I mean... you can but the vast majority of the subreddits on reddit will likely ban you for it.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 11:37 AM
8

FGM Can range between being way worse than circumcision to no where near as bad as circumcision. There are different forms of FGM however they all get lumped up into one so they can play fast and loose with the stats in the the public's perception. I am in no way anything other than opposed to all forms of FGM - but do understand that you are lacking all the info.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 11:22 AM
2

A bit exaggerated but otherwise accurate. a comic ...uhhh
/r/MensRights20/10/19 11:08 AM
4

You do however find decent foundations. Signed:-someone who from his early teens sought to embrace the "build healthy relationships" perspective and has been burned many times from the foundation up.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 11:03 AM
3

Ironic response considering the OP submission.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 11:03 AM
6

Tell them to track down the dude and give him a box also. It might not be MSI's fault, could be the lone soy gunman up there pulling a m'lady in the moment.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 05:10 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq-Bp_2FOGA
/r/MensRights29/09/19 04:43 PM
22

He was pissed but held it together. That "sure" at the question was his table flip. It's fucked up. Her reaction was equally apt. "Huh?" perfect.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 04:42 PM
1

Nah, just immediately start recording yourself the moment you are alone with any woman that isn't your GF/Wife at a con.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 11:47 AM
2

a youtuber "it's a gundam" has a piece on it. I'll link directly. It's worth witnessing and checking out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSq54f2JT_U
/r/MensRights29/09/19 11:46 AM
55

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8QOgazIH7k
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:13 AM
2

The biggest hit will be generational. Men never had a reason to buy Gillette over another brand other than surface level marketing. Now men have a reason to not buy Gillette for a cause. That's poisonous. Men will be teaching their sons why they shouldn't buy a brand, possibly their daughters too.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:12 AM
1

Even fractional movements away has an impact. Do what you need to - consumer revolt doesn't need to be black and white and as you have noted in the world of huge mega-corps it's near impossible. Many moving away from most P&G products cumulatively hurts more than an individual moving away from all.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:09 AM
0

This is a parody alteration. IIRC the panels are also out of order. The original was the redhead revealing "she" is transgender to the guy.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 01:06 PM
1

Bill Burr's Take - for the fraction of you who haven't seen it and the rest who want to re-live it.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:59 AM
1

It's an amazing podcast. It's 2 hours IIRC - fastest 2 hour podcast you will ever listen to.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:58 PM
210

Additionally, according to the LGBT liaison, "schools have an obligation to not disclose the student’s transgender status to other students or parents unless the student has provided explicit permission to do so." I can't stop heaving from my laughter. You don't think the boys in the locker room won't figure out the student's "Status"? I can then see them using the boys observation skills as a violation of the disclosure laws obligations (I don't know if there is actually law in FL that prohibit…
/r/MensRights15/11/18 01:31 PM
21

Our current one. When Title IX was originally implemented it had to do with the disparity in funding between male sports and female sports. It didn't look at the profitability of the respective sports or gender catagories. So University Football teams in Texas as an example, were threatened because there wasn't the equivalent funding amount for women's sports at the same school. https://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/benching-title-ix/Content?oid=864507 Its scope from its original implimentation has …
/r/MensRights15/11/18 07:08 AM
18

There should be compulsory DNA testing as a standard at time of birth. Don't want to do it for the sake of fairness to men? Ok - health of the child then.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:39 PM
6

Probably a lot less than you would think. I've been studying this stuff since the early 2000's so all of that was off the top of my head. An ancillary bonus, if you are interested - it's semi connected but not directly. A great primer article to read is by the same name as CH sommers' book. Do note - it's an article from 2000, and all of its data is still relevant today. I feel it's an important article because of how old it is. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/05/the-war-agains…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:04 PM
25

Can't give all of them to you but I can give you some. US Department of Labor commissioned report (2009) which was the spearhead source for the most recent push backs against the wage gap myth. .pdf warning https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/public-policy/hr-public-policy-issues/Documents/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf Now - this is important. Concerning the domestic violence statistics they are semi-cherry picked, but more in order to prove a point (not forgiving or condemning it). I'll gi…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:35 PM
3

the points are real however.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:02 AM
1

Angry Harry was one of the very first that I know of that used the "if women were being paid less companies would only hire women" logical argument - but I think it might have stemmed from something earlier that Thomas Sowell might have written. RIP A.H.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:02 AM
2

Jonathan Pie skits are "Dramatic" comedic sketches framed from the point of view of a field journalist. He's been hitting nails on the head as of late. Yes, it's made up but the arguments are real.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 07:00 AM
7

Their justification for the hypocrisy is that "men did it to men" which is the same reasoning they use to fold in prison rape in rape statistics.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 01:31 AM
1

This has been known for some years (decades?) the previous data could be found in intimate partner violence differences between Hetero sexual relationships vs Homosexual Male relationships vs. Homosexual female (lesbian) relationships. Lesbian relationships had the highest incidence of intimate partner violence according to studies - but it was often buried. The last time I bothered to pay attention to such a study was ~2009. IIRC the data found its way slyly into the CDC reports on intimate par…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 05:41 PM
4

And the "beauty" of the justice? It's in-built and inevitable. There is no fixing it for a couple of generations - the swing out was slow, the swing back will probably be even slower because of political bias. It's essentially the issue China has currently with prospective brides because of the one-child policy matched with men/boys being seen as the more valuable investment. Feminism has engineered multiple generations worth of marital and emotional unhappiness into the fabric of the west. It's…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:47 AM
5

Social pressure keeps their body from developing as much lung volume? (Among other things)
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:49 PM
14

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/11231320/Rosetta-mission-scientist-Dr-Matt-Taylor-cries-during-apology-over-offensive-shirt.html You have way too much faith in humanity.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:41 PM
5

Quick and dirty connection? Heterosexaul men are vilified for their sexuality by feminism and society. It's often treated as "dirty" sexist, dangerous and an array of other negative implications. This study and article can help some in that department by revealing that pushing fat acceptance as the new normal won't re-write men's programming. It doesn't solve all the issues men face in the modern day but it's a small contributing piece.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:32 PM
12

Worst part? They were probably more interested in the headline value of the 10k number more than anything else.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:39 PM
9

What you describe I know for a fact happens and the way it happened is definitely based on your sex- however, the term Mansplaining in how it's used is so far away from your experience that it simply doesn't mean it. It was invented to describe what happened to you - but from day 1 it was never used to describe what happened to you and instead used as a go-to trump card to shut down conversations the person was losing. It was an emergency rip-chord from the word go. Not faulting you specifically…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:42 PM
24

This very point was accidentally made in the infamous wonderwoman comic volume that featured some sort of anti-MRA bs dialogue as she used the "rope of truth" or whatever - http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Wonder-Woman-mansplain.png You can't make this shit up, SJW's literally debating themselves and losing.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:31 PM
2

Pie. all other things being equal it has higher water content so in the fringe case that you are dehydrated and starving, it will serve you better.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 08:28 PM
1

Wikipedia is a decent resource for information only if you are aware of wikipedia's shortcomings which teachers have been trying to convey to students for over a decade but students have largely ignored. I agree with the opinion but don't conflate research with science - that's part of the shell game. Just because something has been researched doesn't mean that the resulting information was scientifically proven. There are heavy ideological biases in research and paper writing that get exposed a…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:17 PM
1

What view are you talking about? or do you mean in general?
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:07 PM
2

The disparity between over 200 research institutions for one half the population compared to only 3 (at the time) of the other when nearly all policy starts at that level is a huge problem that largely gets ignored because of the bias for one gender and against another. It's not "Sexy" to fund prostate cancer research. It's not "sexy" to look into why boys have been behind girls in education since at least the mid 90's.. It's not "sexy" to look into why young boys are on average more immune comp…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:01 PM
1

It actually isn't, but to prove that we'd need to go into a long back and forth over the edit wars and how they are politically motivated and for how long they have been going on. As short of a TLDR I can give you Agendas are pushed on Wikipedia, not by the kinds of sources that are allowed, but by the kinds of sources that are disallowed. In 2009 CH. Sommers gave a persentation at the Weber male-studies imporium on staten Island (there is a really really bad web-stream recording of it). At the …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 04:55 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8TqhBIEbWA
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:32 AM
1

http://www.chrisharding.net/wetherobots/comics/2008-01-07-Misinformed.jpg
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:17 PM
1

It looks like the Pussy Pass cut-off age is 40 or so.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:15 PM
1

I am ask me anything. An informal board exchange between a particular individual and that community where they can ask that person anything - just asking doesn't guarantee an answer however. Generally questions tend to be focused towards that person's specialty or profession. They didn't start on Reddit but were popularized by reddit. There is a subreddit by the name IAMA where most of these take place.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 10:18 PM
7

For the curious, look up Erin Pizzey. Although Anon above has some of the facts a bit wrong, it's the general gist. She's also done a couple AMA's over the years on IAMA. (if you google Erin Pizzey AMA, they should pop right away)
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 02:27 PM
1

That's been the case for a while now.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 10:03 PM
2

Nah. It could be easily argued that she chose black because of societal prejudices and not her own personal bigotry. Water finding the path of least resistance. It could even be argued she went by prevailing crime statistics per-capita for violent crime - where black men would still qualify for the type of rabbit pulled out of a hat. I know where you are coming from but from a legal standpoint it can't go anywhere.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 07:26 AM
3

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-12-22/features/9612220045_1_pay-child-support-child-support-behalf http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/
/r/MensRights23/03/17 03:40 AM
1

Look up heterosexual Female to male transmission rates of HIV. I'll do it for you. Having sex with a person with HIV increases your risk of contracting the virus. HIV may be transmitted both anally and vaginally during sexual intercourse. According to the CDC, the risk of infection for receptive penile or vaginal sex is 8 per 10,000 exposures. For insertive penile-vaginal sex, the risk of infection lowers to 4 out of 10,000 exposures. 4 in 10,000 Now you want to divide into that the dubious and …
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:48 AM
1

The analog to dick is generally "bitch" in potency - at least in the US. I know the social potency of "cunt" is lower in the UK and in Australia they use it as an informal article at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/17 07:56 AM
2

Strongly disagree - but do so from the perspective that I've been on this particular subreddit for about as long as this account has been active. Believe it or not the sub's welcoming of different points of view has in the past driven away "more militant" participants on "this side" of the ideological divide. There is a reason why there is a "the red pill" subreddit - because their particular dogma was not allowed to be preached here using this sub as a free soap box. (semi related to my manhood…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:02 AM
1

As per the moderator's note - "we" would have a lot more stuff up on the front page of /r/all but most of what successfully and easily could make it to the front page are not allowed here (memes, image posts, etc are a large portion). It's sort of self-induced seclusion. The mods aren't stupid, they know what formats would be popular, but long ago they decided they didn't want this sub to turn into the equivalent of /r/gaming
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:54 AM
3

It does not include this one - and it's a golden mean fallacy to suggest it. There are very few bannings on this subreddit and those that happen tend to be directed not towards critics or those with opposing views, but those who seek to use the sub as a platform for either advertizement (old school manhood101 spam) or seeking to bring irrelevent topics up over and over after many warnings (we had a ron paul poster who would spam political ron paul talking points weaved very slightly into MR issu…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:47 AM
5

google "consad report" - should be the very first (pdf) to load up. It's a 2009 study summary commissioned by the US Department of Labor. It essentially reaffirms Sowell's points. The wage gap is to professional economists what anti-vaccination is to the medical professional field. Doesn't stop the stupid and/or unscrupulous from carrying on about it.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:37 AM
5

"Are puppies oppressive to women? - How our furry friends might be keeping you from achieving your dreams!"
/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:01 PM
31

The reason why you should be against the death penalty isn't to protect those who really did it - but to protect those who really didn't. If there was a 100% fool-proof and infallible way to determine guilt of capital crimes, I'd be for the death penalty. There isn't so I'm not. For example - what if the woman in the article managed to kill her kids then frame the husband/father?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 06:53 AM
3

We don't - but damn if he isn't being honest at the end of it - he should be an actor. That said - the trick could be he is reenacting "catching" his wife cheating and is just drawing on those emotions. Either way - the last 20 or so seconds of the clip really got to me and wanted to post it here.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 02:54 AM
1

They would never consider leaving it to 18. question - why? And by that I mean - does it state as much in any of the holy texts? Or is this a developed over-time tradition that has become sacred for the sake of tradition but isn't actually in the teaching of Judaism?
/r/MensRights14/11/16 12:21 AM
1

Is that still the case if they do it when they are 18? Is there anything that says they won't get into the afterlife if they get circumcised at 18 instead?
/r/MensRights13/11/16 11:05 PM
1

And the dishonesty of the article is that it presents the two as being mutually exclusive - when it most certainly is not.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 09:56 PM
3

How long you can last is a case of your own pacing. I can't speak for others but I can "choose" when to finish- it's as much a mental thing as a physical stimulation thing. There are the old tropes of "think of baseball, think of your grandma, think of taxes, think of [insert famously ugly celebrity here]" - There is more than some truth to the trope. Also - you can slow down or even speed up - There is a "fast" pace that will please her but wouldn't please me trigger sensations as intensely as …
/r/MensRights13/11/16 09:48 PM
2

It allows for an avenue of intent. Prior to puberty the likelyhood of an action - even if it could be interpreted as sexual in nature - usually is not sexual in nature. This was a kiss on the hand - which could have been as simple as the boy mimicking a Disney film. Also - kissing on the hand might be romantic to some - but it's one of the furthest things from sexual you can do with a kiss. Y'all would freak the fuck out and have brain aneurysms if you observed the youth in France, Jesus. (we gr…
/r/MensRights13/11/16 06:59 PM
5

"Feminism" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights13/11/16 06:51 PM
13

The issue is the common use of accusations to gain leverage in custody cases. "years go by and then all of a sudden when a divorce is coming up the father starts beating and/or molesting his children." That doesn't make any sense - even with the extra stress in the situation it still doesn't make sense.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 06:49 PM
2

VAWA is written in gender neutral language but the criteria is sexually biased (men, on average, are larger than women) - they use sexually unique trends to side step sexually unique language. There is a lot more wrong with VAWA beyond that - but that's a good example. It's like writing a law that says anyone who is taller their their partner is automatically presumed a threat in a domestic dispute no matter the other circumstances and should be barred from the shared residence until a magistrat…
/r/MensRights12/11/16 07:05 PM
0

Don't worry - We've been around long enough and had "false olive branches" offered to us enough times to know it's BS. Maybe our newer eyes need an example or two - but the chances of an outlet like the guardian turning over a new leaf are about the same as Trump getting elected... wait... no, I mean as likely as HILLARY getting elected... does that work?
/r/MensRights12/11/16 06:48 PM
4

I see, The Ghostbusters maneuver. It's a bold strategy cotton, lets see if pays off for them.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 07:00 AM
2

You don't understand the history of men and boys as it pertains to the white house and domestic policy if you don't understand why her tweet is an issue here. Let me give you 3 very important links so you can possibly start to understand. Beyond those three it gets worse- not better for your argument. In a perfect world, you might have a valid argument, this is not a perfect world. https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/cwg https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/cmb http://www.thea…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:58 PM
1

As an example: I don't believe in what HeForeverBleeds says and that men should have 50% say on abortion - not at all. That said, I do think women having full say without taking full responsibility is also not right. Further - I don't believe men should be completely absolved from the responsibility of a child they help produce. It's an imperfect world and I think the closest we can come to something considered "Fair" is the concept of financial abortion. That it is presumed that men have no fin…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:03 AM
20

"Women have always been the primary victims of war" -HRC The late Angry Harry was the one who first exposed me to this quote back when his original site was the only real portal for anything resembling MRA issues. He exposed me to Erin Pizzey, CH Sommers, Fathers 4 Justice and many many more and was instrumental in breaking me away from feminist think. That quote has stuck with me for over 15 years at this point and is the reason why I would never, in this lifetime or the next vote for Hillary C…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:12 AM
2

"for a while" Since at least before 1996
/r/MensRights06/11/16 12:50 AM
15

purposeful sample size minimum perhaps?
/r/MensRights18/10/16 02:11 AM
5

"Approximately 80%" would have been better. "Almost" is soft speech that people will subconsciously dismiss, especially if the statement is in opposition to their ideological presumptions.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:50 PM
1

A bit of an update: Budlight has killed comments and disabled voting but here is a screen from last night of the voting ratio. http://i.imgur.com/PCHoq9P.png And an Archive.is grab from around the same time http://archive.is/FZEGk
/r/MensRights28/06/16 11:10 PM
1

That's new, last night they weren't There is an archive.is for it, probably a few.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 10:59 PM
5

Welcome to 2016!
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:43 PM
21

Another thing that is even less up for debate and is even more important when you realize it; Lung Capacity. This is the primary reason men simply perform better physically than women. Period. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12773331 The volume of adult female lungs is typically 10-12% smaller than that of males who have the same height and age. That doesn't even account for the fact that Men as a whole are larger than Women.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:38 AM
4

This is true from my understanding. CH Sommers gave a talk in 2009 at Wagner College - Male Studies Imporium. The talk the following year included a Female genetic biologists speaking about what your presented subject. Boy babies and boys during early childhood are at a disadvantage biologically as it pertains to the immune system and a few other things because testosterone essentially attacks it all. I'm not doing the subject justice but it was a really fascinating talk.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:32 AM
0

I'll concede that that is possible - I'll maintain though that it's improbable.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:10 AM
0

I have a buddy who is a teacher and writes questions using those programs. The program didn't mess up. That had to be manually entered and question chosen. The mess ups like this are from human error. This isn't human error, this is maliciousness. That said if I were in his shoes I wouldn't insist that it was malicious - I would make a title IX stink thought holding maliciousness as a just as likely reason as anything else. Meaning it gives them an out - but it needs to be recorded/precedent set…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 11:39 PM
10

We will under no circumstances be submitting an appeal for the decision by UCI as that would be an admittance to a wrongdoing we did not commit. We will not be silenced and we will not be stopped. The College Republicans straight up told them no prisoners, no surrender. Admin will have to cave - This is something Trump would jump on and the last thing they want is a National spotlight on them, and they know it. If Trump is elected - it will be in part due to the SJW/Feminist menace on college ca…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 11:03 PM
3

3 sexist jokes, 2 of them purposely use men, it wasn't girl/boy/girl, or girl girl boy, or any sort of arrangement except one that is designed specifically to drive the point home that if you want a point on this question - you should have bowed and scraped before womanhood. Not only was it not a simple mistake - it seems to have been engineered specifically to "Drink male tears" so to speak.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 10:10 PM
7

Agree with that, I took those comments to be facetious.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:12 PM
84

No - as it pertains to the law - we don't. The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Lincoln.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 05:35 PM
10

I made this argument about 3-4 years ago on this board as a point for being against the draft for women. Not because I want men drafted - but because of biases the "non-combat rear with the gear" roles will be filled out with women there-by displacing men "to the front". Further - the boost in overall manpower through the displacement of the "disposable" sex could even embolden some while considering confrontation - after all, you would have more effective manpower. these were all arguments with…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 05:22 PM
2

Nothing, never said there was. I said If you want a real life example of this.... It's an example of an "Alpha" with a candid look inside the result. Now from an overall societal view - well - instability... but that's still a ways off.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 11:02 PM
3

Not talking about FWB. -I'm talking about one girl waiting her turn while another is in a shower etc.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 08:02 PM
10

If you want a real life example of this. Recently Tobiscus - a youtube personality was accused of rape. Now I'm not going to comment on the validity of that particular accusation - but when it happened about a dozen female youtube personalities came out and commented on both sides of the issue. The large theme between all of them was that they all slept with him - knew the others were sleeping with them - and none of them "really cared" - to the extent one would expect in a monogamous relationsh…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:21 PM
2

Or OK Trends. http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/the-biggest-lies-in-online-dating/
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:17 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3uOMCfopR8
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:26 AM
8

Take breaks. I've been following this shit since early 2000's and you need to take breaks from it. There is no shame - and the MRM is huge compared to a decade ago so other people can carry water while you get lost in other healthier interests.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 04:03 AM
42

Conviction rates yo - not "find the truth" rates.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 04:01 AM
1

He also has the best interviews with both Erin Pizzey and Angry Harry - AH who fairly recently passed away. AH was a huge instrument and driving force for the MRM in the "early days" ~2000 - 2009
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:42 PM
2

"trolling" -
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:40 PM
2

I recognize almost all the names on the list and then instantly realize I don't really have anything to ask them because most of them have easily accessible media of their views that cover almost everything that would be appropriate to ask.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:37 PM
8

It's from an era where it was presumed women never hit.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:46 PM
1

See - even this was funnier than they are. (your response).
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:23 PM
6

I don't find any of them funny. Maybe by female comic standards but compared to male standup? Hell - I can even think of a few other female comics that are more funny. They are funny in the same way Adam Sandler is funny - he has a market - he isn't talented.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:15 PM
2

by "SJW" I'm using the mindset and general group and culture that is the reason. It started well before "SJW" was coined - but "SJW" encompasses a lot of the finer details that go into a "death by 1000 passive aggressive suggestions" that surround the "why". I watched it myself over the years.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 07:41 PM
6

And it started happening before Pao was a thing. It's largely the incestuous relationship "SJWs" via mainly SRS has with Reddit Admins.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 07:20 PM
8

It's just the opposite actually. There is a huge entity standing over your daughter's shoulder making sure that if she wanted to she could much more easily get accepted into any STEM field than a man of the same skill set, intelligence and drive would.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 08:23 AM
1

FTFY
/r/MensRights25/04/16 01:48 PM
6

It was in reference to Erin Pizzey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey
/r/MensRights16/04/16 10:19 PM
6

Because feminists will harass your family and kill your family pets. They may also threaten your life and drive you out of the country.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:30 PM
2

Yeah, Angry Joe =/= Angry harry. I know of Angry "you fucked it up" Joe.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 03:19 AM
2

I'm not saying he should kill her, but I'd understand.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 07:35 PM
15

For all those who feel thankful that there is now a growing men’s movement, even those who never heard of Angry Harry, they have him to thank for possessing the genius and tenacity to get the ball rolling. This cannot be overstated enough. His site, IIRC was founded in 2001 - or around there. I found it somewhere between 2001 and 2002. He is the one who pointed me to the article that precedes the book by C.H. Sommers. The War Against Boys Which was one of two parts that "converted me" from Femin…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 07:32 PM
7

I'm confused by your question. The video featured features Angry Harry. The video is from another "early Mens Rights Movement" contributor who chose to bow out of the game by the name of ManWomanMyth. Who used to have a pretty large website and made an absolutely amazing a-z Mens Rights documentary (where the featured video is from). Angry Harry on youtube (he only has a few videos) is the same being interviewed in the ManWomanMyth video (same guy also interviewed Erin Pizzy before she was on mo…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 07:21 PM
6

is violence and the threat of violence
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:57 PM
14

I disagree, violence is never the answer That's so naive. Not saying violence is the answer in this case but it is violence and the threat of violence that keeps the world mostly civilized.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:09 PM
1

I've tried to kick that football so many times Lucy... it turns out it's just reality looping back in on itself. Rational Wiki is great for its list of fallacies (formal and informal) - but not much else. Same thing with Wikipedia - great for various (hard) scientific data - not useful for much else.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 01:40 AM
3

To get the party started. What do you think are the top three (any order) most important issues today within the Feminist scope that needs to be tackled and solved?
/r/MensRights14/04/16 12:20 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnIry04rMGo&nohtml5=False
/r/MensRights13/04/16 09:00 PM
22

When selling a used PS4 I arranged to meet at a walmart half way between the prospective buyer's location and mine. I told him I could make any arrangement for time during the day (sun up to sun down). He tried to convince me we could only meet at between midnight and 4am because of his work schedule. lol - nope.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:34 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tC1gRZ6pEko
/r/MensRights12/04/16 02:13 PM
0

Critics accusing MRA's of whining =/= MRA's actually whining. Look at his definition of whining - he is talking about things that merely "offend" - MRA's seek legal balance in the force law. How it's written, how it's applied, how it's enforced. We currently don't have that in the west.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 02:07 PM
1

"1 in 52 is still too high"
/r/MensRights12/04/16 02:00 PM
4

I have been circumcised, and it's a bad thing because pro/cons of any of this that or the other thing are all moot when you can leave it up to the individual to decide if they want to or not. Circumcision shouldn't be illegal. Circumcision without informed consent should be.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 02:44 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
/r/MensRights11/04/16 02:42 PM
26

http://patri-archie-comics.tumblr.com/image/139289605972
/r/MensRights11/04/16 01:41 PM
3

This is an ugly mess on all sides. What the girl in the featured vid describes is more than just a hoax or some sort of vendetta thing. I've personally witnessed it before and people in the psychiatric field will have all sorts of diagnosis alarm bells going off. That said yes - Innocent until proven guilty - as futile as it might seem at times. I have a pretty damn strong gut feeling about what's going on here - but I'd never use that as justification for my stance one way or another. It's a sh…
/r/MensRights10/04/16 08:18 PM
1

My issue with all of this isn't her views one way or another. My issue is that people are holding her up as a beacon or an authoritative voice. She's just now 18. Same thing with Watson. Someone link the two of them to Erin Pizzy's Wikipedia Page.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 01:55 AM
2

https://www.google.com/search?q=women+only+firm
/r/MensRights09/04/16 08:48 PM
18

No. Privileged + Power... or something.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:18 PM
1

16 year old girl and an 18 year old MAN.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:17 PM
1

Which is connected to the trope of Men are from mars women are from venus. - Not saying the trope is wrong - but relationships 101 (communication) "teaches us" When your female significant other comes to you to complain - she doesn't want a solution, she just wants someone to listen and empathize with. Men don't see empathy as being more useful than a solution because between nurture and nature - they are programmed to strive toward being self sufficient. When they cannot it destroys them and th…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:21 PM
3

I don't know what their professional interests are - but it's absolutely possible to get a college quality education by teaching yourself - it just then heavily depends on your portfolio or accomplishments inspite of not having a piece of paper to get into an industry. Also - college isn't really valuable (with some isolated exceptions) in what you are taught - the real value is in the networking while there - both personal, social, and professional. Things to keep in mind.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:22 PM
3

ban the linked accounts for brigading. Oh you sweet summer child. That only happens to "wrong think" accounts. Jokes aside - good work.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:19 PM
1

You are still here?
/r/MensRights03/04/16 07:59 PM
1

You are still here?
/r/MensRights03/04/16 07:46 PM
1

"when I subbed" Account 2 months and 18 days old. Well shit son - you clearly have been around a lot longer than the rest of us - How can we make /r/MensRights great again? Bye Felicia.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 07:36 PM
2

I have a question - was there even a lesser sentence to this short of dismissing the case? Isn't this pretty much the bottom of the barrel minimum? Time served and probation?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:31 AM
1

Related - Steven Pinker in a ted talk speaking about the surprising decline of violence over the ages.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 11:45 PM
5

"She won't stop fighting to try to make sure Rocco is kept safe and has what he needs. She can't understand why it has come to this. Her world has been shattered." Bolded emphasis mine... ... Really!? Really? Well... there it is.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:24 PM
2

because "IT" work in India is not the same thing as "IT" work in the UK - that's the main reason.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:42 PM
223

County Officials say Sturdivant said he felt he could not control her since he was gone with work for a week or more at a time. Authorities say Sturdivant didn’t do anything to stop the mother other than trying to limit the money she had available to spend on drugs. According to the report, the mother admitted to Health Officials in September that she had smoked methamphetamine in her second trimester of pregnancy. Was he supposed to restrain her to a bed with straps, a gag and a bed pan?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:27 AM
5

Can you go in and say you identify as a female attack helicopter and get it for free along with a complimentary hellfire missile?
/r/MensRights28/02/16 03:22 AM
2

What percentage of those who drink alcohol resort to violent crime?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:47 AM
1

You miss the point entirely - and it is about Authority - The Authority a given profession is bestowed can be used directly to influence people that would otherwise not be influenced. In children such authority is even more influential well beyond the point of reason and rationality. You are pretty damn naive if you think the authority of a police officer, teacher or doctor wouldn't have sway over the decision making of even someone 18 years of age. Being granted that authority also means being …
/r/MensRights16/02/16 07:20 PM
5

I've witnessed this phenomenon for years but there is no way to broach the subject because "sexism". I've seen inferior technical work by women get accepted and praised over superior but thankless technical work by men just because of the genders involved. I've seen final products developed that were objectively inferior to what their potential could have been based solely on the genders and their respective contributions involved in the project. I've seen token "office girls" pushed up through …
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:44 PM
5

Yet corporations will bend to the "viral".
/r/MensRights21/01/16 10:57 PM
10

Download and save this while you are at it. Department of Labor Report refuting the wage gap myth - .pdf download It used to be hosted on its own research site but the original site has gone down in recent times. The report was commissioned by the department of labor and published in ~2009.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 04:10 PM
3

It's not specifically kinnect. It's pretty much all photo sensors. It's the technology because physics is racist. Think about the first obvious and apparent difference between a white person and a black person for a second... one more second... Now realize cameras are meant to capture light. Yeah - it is a technology issue. I recall some camera phones getting shit because their "Face recognition" doodads had problems tracking black faces. https://www.google.com/search?q=Digital+camera+black+face…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:31 PM
3

Currently we have about 10,000 unique visitors each day, and 200,000 uniques per month. That's a lot of people watching. And that number got there by not censoring what is written on the board and instead letting the community determine what has merit and what doesn't. The mod team has been pretty damn solid sticking by that up until just recently. all of these "feel good" stickie posts that amount to nothing more than excuses as to why you want to now censor stuff that was previously not censor…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:08 AM
2

I have no idea. None of my mod annotations were directed towards you. It honestly caught you probably more ire than you would have otherwise. I sent the mod stack a message asking them WTF? "We all" have our bad days. http://i.imgur.com/hJ9qdb9.png Laughter is decent medicine.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:46 AM
4

I just wanted to be accepted somewhere. ... What do you mean by accepted? There is an "old" meme "lurk moar" meaning to not participate in a community until you have observed it for a while so you first see if its for you and then if it is for you to gain the understanding and vibe of that community. In lurking and passively paying attention you learn what does and does not "fly". The thing about this community is that it generally doesn't passive aggressively sticky overly sensitive posts as so…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:29 AM
1

I had to look it up. Bursary is a scholarship. So the mother was trying to get more of a discount to the school and when the school denied her attempt she started throwing around false accusations against the first male teacher she could find. This is the western culture we live in. "Not getting my way, let me accuse the nearest male of being a pedophile" - are you fucking serious? I feel bad for the daughters. I doubt they have any hope of not coming out as complete bitches on the other side of…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 01:42 AM
3

Is it possible for more women to have sex than more men? PDF link explaining not only how it's possible, but how it's fact If you want to side step the paper - look up "Is there anything good about men?" What does it mean that we are descended from twice as many women as men? It can be explained like this. Of all the people who ever reached adulthood, maybe 80% of the women but only 40% of the men repro- duced. Or perhaps the numbers were 60% versus 30%. But one way or another, a woman’s odds of…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 07:14 PM
2

Who has an easier time getting laid in general, men or women? pro tip
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:46 PM
5

I can't speak for all studies but I do recall seeing this pattern in HIV transmission rates where Male -> Female was much higher than Female -> Male, and both were really low (heterosexual). This was over 5 years ago so I don't even have the links to them anymore. If you are looking for some hard numbers though I'd focus on a specific STI and HIV/AIDS would be a good one since so much focus over the last 3 decades has been dedicated to it.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:44 PM
3

The first thing I do is look up the researchers then follow who they work for or worked for or their funding. That doesn't necessarily write off their findings or the paper - but it can clue you into if they would be prone to looking for a specific answer before the research is started.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 01:12 AM
2

She would be right to leave. If it's clear she wants kids and it is clear you do not ... why are you guys together? I'd blame you more than her because she actually has a time limit on that shit and it's unfair to he to be dragging it out.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:28 AM
6

No, it's just memes that get 3000 upvotes because internet culture has developed a really short attention span. As a matter of fact as I tell you there are constantly action opportunities stickied and posted on this sub each week you start to lose interest in reading past about this point because you are part of that internet culture. If you weren't you would realize your statement is simply not true.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:22 AM
1

CHS was calling herself an equity feminist before the term "MRA" was coined. She is trying to change feminism from the inside. I've read CHS for over a decade now and there is nothing she stands for that stands apart from general MRA themes and goals. Further there is no general or major issue that I know of that the MRM fights for that CHS would be against. she doesn't call herself an MRA because it would be redundant to do so in her case. If you have any questions I could go on.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:23 PM
1

A small research firm was commissioned by the US Department of Labor in a report published in 2009 found, in short "no" there is no wage gap. http://commons.wikimannia.org/File:Gender_Wage_Gap_Final_Report_2009.pdf That's the pdf of the research paper with a section from the DOL. Essentially it's the main source to support such explanations like the following. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwogDPh-Sow I originally stumbled upon the paper in 2009 while doing college work. It's essentially a sil…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:04 PM
6

Women in University have been outnumbering men since at least 1997. The research commonly cited to support claims of male privilege and male sinfulness is riddled with errors. Almost none of it has been published in peer-reviewed professional journals. Some of the data turn out to be mysteriously missing. A review of the facts shows boys, not girls, on the weak side of an education gender gap. The typical boy is a year and a half behind the typical girl in reading and writing; he is less committ…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 11:17 PM
2

/r/offmychest /r/bestof /r/IAMA (for a while now, 2 years at least) The above 3 made round about rules specifically to exclude anything to do with Mens Rights. The /r/mensrights subreddit and content making it to the above 3 never broke any rules and the submissions were always very popular. The only way the above subreddits could "get rid" of MR content (would show up maybe once/twice a month organically) was to re-write the rules. In the case of both IAMA and Bestof the rule changing was eithe…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 03:28 AM
4

In short. You don't pay child support to her. You pay it to the state and the state gives her child support. This is how the law in the US interprets the relationship. She cannot sign away the child's rights. Child support is seen as serving the child, not the mother. The mother is seen as simply a custodian of the funds. She is either lying or is ignorant to what is and what is not. Not only should you consult a lawyer but you should ignore the advice of any lawyer that doesn't point out the ab…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 08:50 AM
5

The MRA/MGTOW split started a while back and the rift develops more and more as time passes. Around 2009-2010 there were as many MGTOW comments, participants and links on this subforum as there were any other kinds. Same thing with Pickup artists. Other honorable mentions are storm fronters as well as right wingers and neocons. All eventually "left" and made their own communities or returned to established ones. Not saying anyone here doesn't belong to any of the above groups but they've learned…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 08:18 AM
4

3 minute nasal bore.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 12:57 AM
1

let that happen naturally as oppose to pushing what we think is suppose to be a boy toy or a girl toy. The person I was replying to above. What happens naturally is irrelevant to the decision of putting up signs. I wasn't replying to you so the above is a non sequitur.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 12:46 AM
3

Because what happens naturally doesn't jive with the Narrative™. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13596-male-monkeys-prefer-boys-toys/
/r/MensRights25/12/15 11:17 PM
10

And I'll tell you to do what I tell all fathers in your position to do. Go out and get an inexpensive journal and writing pen. It doesn't have to be anything crazy but it should be a somewhat proper journal. Get into the habit of bringing this journal around with you wherever you go and get into the habit of not losing it. What I tell fathers in your position to do is to write to your kids in the journal. Whenever you are thinking about them and have a moment, date and time an entry and write yo…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 11:16 PM
6

Cut off your nose to spite the sensibilities of the institution. It won't work. He's a man. To put it into perspective if it was the father of the kids and the aunt fighting and the aunt accused the father of molesting the kids to the police, guess what would happen? At the very least he would be put in jail for the night or a temporary retraining order issued. Possibly CFS taking the kids away temporarily.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 06:48 PM
2

/r/mensrights was banned from best of because there were a lot of posts from here making it to best of and being popular. They banned "all ideological subs" from best of - but that's only because Mens Rights benefited the most from it. The rule of no ideological subs on best of exists because of "us".
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:57 PM
4

Repeatedly divorcing while looking for the one will turn into the new dating... until the merry go round comes to a creaking aching stop and the catcalls become mysteriously absent.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:07 PM
3

In general men see suicide as a solution to a problem, women see it as an expression of their pain.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:02 PM
1

One additional note. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGDl6-lyfMY Did you know Stephen Fry is "bi polar" aka "Manic depression"?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:22 AM
1

I know you are aware, but what you aren't aware of is that you actually can change and manage that. It wouldn't be easy, it's not as simple as a pill or turning on/off a switch. Nah, it would be hard but ask yourself, would it be better than where you are now?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 03:20 AM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_tax A bachelor tax is essentially social legislation to achieve just that. Instead now we have tax benefits for the married, and further for children. Same thing.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:10 PM
3

My favorite part of that movie was smith's character pointing out and emphasizing that distinction. Amazingly valuable distinction that probably went over most people's heads.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:09 PM
1

I know that I'm a piece of shit that should have been aborted or drowned in a toilet at birth. Not the guy you are replying to and not in "his camp" - but you are possibly suffering from mental illness - possibly curable or at the very least manageable mental illness. This more than anything else is what is holding you back in life, everything else is the symptom of, not the cause of. I am not a psychiatric professional so I could be full of shit, but you should try to come to terms with the ide…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:05 PM
0

Your post doesn't contain an archived link, the reason for that oversight is the answer to your question.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 06:55 PM
2

Doesn't know the difference? Nah- that's solved with a quick lookup to make sure you aren't flipping the definitions of cue and queue, or whether weather, etc. No, she doesn't even know that there are two words and thinks the one just covers everything contextually.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 06:38 PM
2

Reminds me of the segment in the BGS series where Adama walks out on a job interview because they have him strapped to a lie detector.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:01 PM
5

The scientific exploration ones are great. I steer clear of anything that involves opinion or politics. Learn to use an Astrolabe is one of my personal favorites. https://www.ted.com/talks/tom_wujec_demos_the_13th_century_astrolabe?language=en But I agree.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:56 PM
3

Which of the two would you rather be tried for if you had to choose? I know which I would.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 06:01 PM
2

Should prison guards be permitted to have consensual sex with inmates where both consent?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:04 PM
3

If confronted with the fact...
/r/MensRights15/12/15 06:15 PM
29

Best advice I got for developing and creating 3d female characters was to learn that the breast and the pectoralis are two separate entities the former laid over the latter. Also the greatest variation between different kinds of breasts happen mostly on the lower hemisphere more so than the upper. Otherwise the nipple is generally centered on the breast (and a little to the outside). That and learning the major differences between male and female facial features on a fundamental level.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:31 AM
11

They would just argue if you pointed it out that those films are only their favorites because there aren't enough female leads so of course their favorites might probably have male leads.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:27 AM
7

And all of a sudden the crazy towards the end of the series makes sense now. Wait, made the most recent rendition or made the campy 80s(?) one?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:25 AM
5

Partly but not mostly - I'm on the same page as you all but social constructs absolutely contribute to at least a proportion of the racial makeup of sports teams. Basketball is a popular sport in urban environments especially because it can be played within a relatively small area. Sports like baseball and hockey need either specialized equipment or environments or much larger areas. There is also the regional popularity of a given sport vs. the demographic of that region. It's not cut and dry b…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:53 AM
1

What do you think then about Jailers and inmates?
/r/MensRights13/12/15 06:13 AM
30

Be handsome Be attractive And don't be unattractive
/r/MensRights06/12/15 11:59 PM
2

"banned" essentially.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 07:39 AM
1

I did not. I wasn't refuting it. The exposition was to compliment your point.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:37 AM
-3

I don't make a judgement as to if it does or does not deserve rape. What I judge against is that it isn't an agreed upon punishment. Want rape in prisons to be the actual punishment for rapists and pedophiles? Ok - then put it into law. Draw up the details as to how the punishment is going to be performed. I don't think having another person in prison do the rape is at all a correct avenue if the point of prison is to reform, or punish. So you have to hire an outside professional. So do we legal…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:59 AM
7

As an active LDS member, this isn't true. Either something else is going on or they're a bit more insane than your average LDS member. So you are crazy, but potentially not as crazy as they are?
/r/MensRights24/11/15 11:24 PM
0

The republican base is putting her in the white house because they cannot nominate a viable candidate. I'm not voting for her, but I'm not voting for Trump either. If you ask me which of the two are the lesser of evils I'll tell you I finally understand on a fundamental level why you cannot divide by zero. IT'S FULL OF STARS.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:27 AM
2

I'm a biker, have been for... ~14 years. "Loud pipes save lives" is just an excuse to get loud pipes. unless you are either riding way above the speed limit (even highway speeds) or your entire exhaust system fell off or you have a big crack in your manifold, no pipe is going to alert the unaware to your presence unless they are right next to you (stopped). Road noise + insulation from a vehicle all but filters out motorcycle engine noise. I've never met a biker who seriously believed pipes were…
/r/MensRights07/11/15 07:26 PM
13

I try and tell this to all fathers in your position. Go get an inexpensive notebook or journal along with a halfway decent writing pen. It doesn't have to be expensive. Anytime you think of your kid (boy?) open up the journal and write to him. Write down your thoughts, whatever comes to mind. Keep anything about his mom -especially negative - out of the journal. Be sure to date the entries as they come. They do not have to be long stories or have perfect grammar or spelling, just write and stay …
/r/MensRights07/11/15 09:26 AM
120

AMA request: Doug.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 11:48 PM
10

Men don't exist.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 08:36 PM
2

doesn't matter. But 9 times out of 10 the difference between a self proclaimed MRA and someone who are interested in the issues but don't identfy - are no different except they don't proclaim to be an MRA. There is tons of split opinons within the MRM and most understand how to agree to disagree. Those who have/could not were driven out (PUA, some clusters of Trad cons, some/most MGTOWs). The sub got real ugly around 2009-2010 and a lot of the more extreme elements "took their ball" and went hom…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 05:17 PM
12

Most MRA's are about exactly where Milo is as it pertains to Feminism. The great lie is that most MRA's are disenfranchised jaded caustic misogynists that got into it because of a bad breakup. It's hilarious because all the GG people as well as the "Milo" readerships come to revelations and say things no different to what MRA's have been saying for the last 15 years. There is a reason why PUA's and MGTOWs stand "apart" from the MRM/MHRM "MRAs". We had our "civil war" somewhere between 2007 and 2…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 05:10 PM
8

http://i.imgur.com/vRfbG4I.jpg
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:26 PM
4

Except all of those examples don't depend on someone else to live off of.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:18 AM
2

Like Levelate - the "Slice of a-" viewpoint is a refreshing one, however you are the first time ever that I've seen that attitude. Not saying it's not true with you, but SAHM expecting to go back to work after the kids are grown is not the common view of the situation.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:17 AM
9

Do we need to link you to the State of the Union featuring the Wage gap myth?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:31 PM
1

I never respond to those. I want to, but don't. They are one part bait, 2 parts passive aggressive straw manning, with a pinch of NaCL. Also add onto there a veneer of brigade rallying.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:01 AM
1

When a public figure states criticism is unwanted, does that make critics who persist harassers? What if those critics and criticisms only respond to further public statements from that public figure?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:59 AM
1

I disagree. Your argument suggests that someone can claim harassment if they themselves repeatedly say stupid shit enough and are refuted each time. The reason why Anita gets "hounded" is not because (most) detractors are seeking to harass her but because it has been apparent to those detractors that she has been a con artist from the start. If that was all she was it wouldn't matter much and I'd say "just ignore her". But she has been involving her con with influencing an industry that many of …
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:54 AM
1

Posed in a heart shape?
/r/MensRights22/10/15 08:53 PM
1

Ritual acts focused on sacred objects, places, times: don't know yet Menstruation performance art/conventional art and how "brave" it is whenever it's done. It's so common it's trite.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:15 AM
3

This is pretty much my origin story too, I became an MRA when I set out to "challenge and debate" MRA's on just how wrong they were. It was a long while ago now, but I remember that "women are wonderful" bias. It's part of human nature.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:09 AM
8

10 years ago no one in general knew what Mens Rights was, 5 years ago no one in academia or the MSM knew what Mens Rights was. I'll take a swipe from the New Yorker, the moment the author felt the need to make a baseless and pointless dig, he or she already lost.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:06 AM
2

I'm not excusing him, but look up and see who his direct competitor is.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:33 AM
1

5 hours later it currently is.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:26 AM
7

Tangentially related; Man With Breast Cancer Denied Medicaid Coverage Because He's Not a Woman different man, different case Southwest Florida man denied mammogram because of gender
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:21 AM
3

Except this sub doesn't ban people with when sources refuting an "argument" are presented. Quite a few other ideological subs do as standard.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:55 PM
7

They are trying to either blame the victim or shift the impact of the "social issue". It's what feminists tend to do when you bring up more men are raped than women in the US because of the prison system.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:36 PM
2

Just an aside; We actually love being called out on BS with sources. So if you ever spot something that you know has legit data to refute, be our guest and point it out.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:32 PM
1

Tell that to POW's
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:11 PM
0

Generally because it's a minor form of salami tactics with the offenders of the dress code seeing what little they can get away with then move the goal posts a bit more. What happens to counter this is a low/no tolerance policy to prevent small exceptions from acting as footholds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX_d_vMKswE The low/no tolerance on dresscode is because generations have tested these rules. [edit] I have a younger sister (1.5 years younger), I watched her and her friends play this …
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:43 AM
6

If you want convicted pedophiles to be subjected to rape - Then codify it in law as a punishment, otherwise it's bullshit and should not be part of the punishment. I'm not taking a position on what rapists or pedophiles "deserve", I'm saying whatever the society in which they commit those crimes believes they deserve, then it should be codified into law - otherwise we are just a bunch of fucking hypocrites when we point toward the barbarity of places like the middle east. And I thought it a funn…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:24 PM
1

If someone's punishment should be rape (eye for an eye) then codify it in law. Do not allow cruel and unusual punishment run rampant in the prison system fueled off of vengeance. I am against the death penalty not for those who deserve it, but for those unfortunately caught up in being subjected to it where they did not deserve it. Having a reprehensible human being guilt of all sorts of heinous charges live out his days in a 6x6 cell is a small price to pay to keep someone who is innocent from …
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:19 PM
2

And I think your action in this case and overall is the way to go. There is the spirit and then there is the letter. Your compromise was sound. The errant "meme" post that breaks out of the atmosphere to hit /r/all every once in a while is fine to expose the subreddit to the more mainstream even if it cuts into the rules a bit. I think most regulars understand that rules against memes/low effort are in order to prevent the sub devolving into a 140 character circle jerk of shallow arguments. It's…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 10:35 PM
1

Oh, "we" all know. Nothing can be done about it. Believe it or not Continental (now united after merge) were one of the last to hold off on all the bullshit we are doing today. Being different in that respect didn't get them any extra market share over the people who did. People care more about getting from point a to point b as cheap as possible than they do about leg room or seat size.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 05:00 PM
1

I have a family member who works fairly high up for United, I'll ask them about this in the coming week.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:00 PM
19

And we don't live in a perfect world. Number 1 isn't intended to use the kids against the wife, number 1 is meant to "clear the air" so the wife can't manipulate the kids through the ignorance of facts. The distinction is there.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:36 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ROOi5xagxg
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:32 PM
5

I think he made the right choice but I dispute the "real stupid stuff in the past". Maybe I missed something, but what stupid stuff was that?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:40 PM
2

"Sexist"
/r/MensRights07/08/15 09:07 AM
1

And that is a grave mistake on their side that I always point out when they claim criticism against feminists is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:17 AM
2

You are conflating Feminist with woman. They are not the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 04:52 AM
15

SRS essentially migrated to SRD. People think SRS has died off in the last year or so. It's formal face has dwindled some in user numbers, but that's because the majority of its base just migrated over to SRD - What is left at SRS are "insulated" sockpuppet accounts - accounts who's entire history begins and ends with SRS. This is done so the main accounts of those useres aren't tarnished by SRS's reputation. Just the pattern I've witnessed over the last ~2-3 years.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:34 AM
3

The people I read here are the male equivalent of the worst Radical Closed-Minded Feminist Women that pollute this world; and are criticized here at /r/mensrights Do you have an example of this behavior that you could point out?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:11 PM
1

The person in a fight who can set aside who wronged who the most is also the one who will get skewered by the system. Your qualification requires "both" but human nature is potentially a very ugly thing at the end of a relationship. Your idea of everyone just dropping the drama is not practical. Your situation is a very rare one, humans aren't "mature" enough to be left to their own devices when an emotional situation like separation or divorce comes up. This is also why the presumption should b…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 11:29 AM
3

The attack some use against MRA is that it's really just a disguise for attacking women; the defense is that MRA simply defends men from unfair attacks and injustice. So when this comes along, a completely innocent (baby) boy and a woman defending a child against a father's and surgeon's illegal genital surgery, my expectation was that this would be immediately upvoted, have many outraged comments, discussion of how this sort of thing can be prevented in the future, etc. Why? Because defending a…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 11:22 AM
1

It's an advertizement targeted at little old ladies. It's not meant to be used to sell to your average guy.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 06:31 AM
8

Setting aside the MGM/Circumcision issue for a second, let me speak to the Father's rights issue. Being for Father's rights is not being for Father's unilateral power and decision making over his children. It's about having EQUAL say over decisions over his children. In this case the rules/law is established that both parents have to consent to the procedure so the father is WRONG in this case. This is not a Father's rights issue, this is a medical negligence issue. Now, that said, Circumcision …
/r/MensRights02/08/15 06:29 AM
8

Stop being an asshole fanatic and presuming everyone's position. Setting aside the MGM/Circumcision issue for a second, let me speak to the Father's rights issue. Being for Father's rights is not being for Father's unilateral power and decision making over his children. It's about having EQUAL say over decisions over his children. In this case the rules/law is established that both parents have to consent to the procedure so the father is WRONG in this case. This is not a Father's rights issue, …
/r/MensRights02/08/15 06:27 AM
1

What would it take, as far as proof is concerned, for the parts you find "delusional" to be proved otherwise?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 12:12 AM
7

Unfortunately those who don't want unpleasant information these days will just go down a thousand point list to find the next viable reason to close their ears and eyes.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 10:31 AM
3

War of the Roses is a good divorce film.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:37 AM
7

(My reply until I saw your post). One of the best - Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father (full movie youtube)- Be warned, it's ROUGH - but a must watch for any "MRA". Best experience - don't look up the film, just watch it. It will hit you the hardest in a visceral (but good and honest) way that way.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:37 AM
1

I don't read him anymore because I can find the "Raw" info elsewhere without the schtick, but what you outline above is very much the case. Without Elam's controversy and AVFM's "black sheep" slant, the term "MRA" and "MRM" would not be as widely known today. HisSide MND Angry Harry Spearhead ManWomanMyth And probably a half dozen others that failed where AVFM "succeeded" Riding that fine enough line between legitimate issue reporting and tantalizing scandalous statements and content without bei…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:52 PM
-9

The problem is that it was the /s that caused you to be downvoted. You either have a poor understanding of the "nuance" of sarcasm and wit, or you are being downvoted for the reason people are downvoting you. http://people.howstuffworks.com/sarcasm.htm By you sarcastically stating "so much misandry" you are suggesting there is no misandry (hatred of men) with either the original scenario, or with the scenario GrimB0ld commented out. In either case you are on the "wrong" side of the /s tag and it…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:09 PM
4

http://i.imgur.com/KEHUJpX.jpg
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:09 PM
2

If you want it bad enough you can get 90% there in 6-12 months. The biggest first step is to educate yourself on nutrition, that's usually the biggest issue to "looking good". A "6 pack" has far more to do with body fat than it has to do with muscle development.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:42 AM
5

Unless you are in the top 20% of men by way of what is considered attractive.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 11:45 PM
2

White House Council on Men and Boys White House Council on Women and Girls - for comparative reference
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:20 PM
1

OP, this is your story in fairytale form by TyphonBlue (one of the honey badgers). The Princess and the Plow horse
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:16 AM
1

And it speaks more to the "takers" defeat than the person being taken from.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:11 AM
5

Agree, there is zero chance that she has been celibate since he left her.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:11 PM
5

5 years ago no one outside of mens rights even knew something called "mens rights" existed.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:50 PM
9

The last image/argument is the entire point in my opinion and you were right about never being able to "understand". I'm curious about the % of women who get their baby DNA tested after having their eggs extracted, fertilized outside of the womb, then re-implanted where that "there is a small chance" of it not being theirs comes into play. I believe women who fight against this kind of verification on behalf of the father do understand. Humans aren't that dense. The same way I can empathize and …
/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:20 AM
2

I've watched enough Idea Channel in the past to already know what is in that video. His political biases are apparent in a few episodes but most of them don't really touch on it. That said he or his researchers/subject writers are very ideological and it shows through overall- mostly in the responses to comments (at the end of segments). They cherry pick way too much the "refutations". They filter out anything that could possibly embarass them. I don't expect the "next installment" to feature an…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:53 PM
8

And that's what it is a lot of the time- yelling "I'm offended" not because they actually are- instead they have this internal gauge of what could be presented as offensive through posturing. It's that "rightous indignation" place shitty customers will go to when they want something they don't deserve. Well here you can "Claim a piece" that is "owed" to you simply by knowing how to play the game, to know the theoretical arguments and imagining how the worst case scenario could be interpreted. It…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:14 AM
3

I can only parody so hard.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:08 AM
-1

Just an FYI, reading over it I don't see any change in how rape and consent is already interpreted. The phrasing still allows silence and lack of resistance to not mean rescinded consent. Further they include both verbal and physical forms of consent, so this still includes body language "she took off her bra and panties then sat on my lap" is still consent by a woman. -This is no the fight you want The fight you want is the current "preponderance of evidence" vs. "beyond a reasonable doubt" dif…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:54 PM
13

This is why I propose all sexual encounters require 2 witnesses along with multi-angle video evidence. The two parties involved in the sexual encounter need to bring along a witness on their behalf. It can be a family member or friend. In the even of more than two participating in the sexual acts, they too need to bring a long a witness. Witnesses cannot be involved in the sexual acts. So, for example, in the case of a 3some there should be at least 6 people in the room and at least two cameras.…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:35 AM
58

Two hour Harvard debate on why it's the case that the iq distribution is the way Milo points out in the OP clip and not if it's the case. The debate is between Steven Pinker and Elizabeth Spelke. Transcript slides and citations can be found here.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:16 PM
8

Indeed, But "mens rights" have often been countered and attempted to be derailed by a well established set of fallacious arguments. Unfortunately the arguments also tend to tug on the "heart strings" of society. Politician comes out and exclaims "during my term I'll enroll policy to help get girls ahead in steam fields" If you point that boys are suffering and have been suffering for well about 2 decades at this point in education in general you will be accused of making it "What about the menz"…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 02:15 PM
9

The "gender politics world" is about to get a whole lot larger after your revelation and you could spend years reading up on it and chasing that rabbit down the hole only to scratch the surface. That said, your opening post really reminded me of the situation with Norah Vincent. 20/20 18 minute expose - Self made man - Norah Vincent 18 minutes Norah Vincent changed herself to appear as a man to "infiltrate" the men's world. Some of her insights really punctuate the theme of your revelation. Anyw…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 01:33 PM
12

A huge part of feminism's progression is due directly to humanity's bias in favor of women.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 05:01 AM
6

20/20 exposé on Norah Vincent - The woman you were referring to, and yes.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 04:01 AM
9

You would enjoy this classic - Men Don't Exist
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:40 AM
3

IAMA, Ask Reddit, TIL, DAE, Best Of, and a few others have an "unspoken rule" to find a tangential excuse and nuke/delete/move/remove or whatever verbiage you want to use to censor "Anti-feminst" type posts, especially if they start to get general positive support. It's been like this for about 2-3 years. /r/mensrights in the infacy of SRS used to make /r/bestof about every 3rd week with on hugely supported insight or perspective after another. That the posts were civil and polite is the reason …
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:30 PM
0

You don't know the what the word tacit means, do you?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:05 PM
0

That is a voice.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 10:56 PM
1

When you only give one side a voice on national TV it's essentially tacit approval of their views.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 10:50 PM
1

Write to them in a journal and save it for when they contact you after they become adults. Write down your thoughts and wishes for them. Try and get into the habit of writing anything down, no matter how big or small, whenever thoughts of your kids pop into your head. Date the entries and be sure it's listed in your will as to what to do with it. -don't give it to them until they are either in their late 20's/early 30's or they seek you out, and not before they move out of her home.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 01:43 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yop184xfdG0
/r/MensRights18/06/15 05:16 AM
5

It doesn't tell me what other people do, it tells me the % of women that could see themselves doing it.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:24 AM
8

Yeah, most of the ones on the left are professional shoots with models and are staged, most (all?) on the right are of real fathers with their kids. Humor aside, it's sexist and attempting to reinforce a false stereotype Ignoring the humor for a second; "what, they couldn't find good enough mothers that most/all the shots weren't staged?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:18 AM
6

They will then cut into the budgets of services for everyone and redirect them to exclusively women if it would secure them another election cycle.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 12:28 AM
3

You forgot about men spreading their legs too wide on public transportation.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:00 PM
1

More variation would not equate to a disproportionate slide between the sexes. As you say, more geniuses but more imbeciles. Both the imbeciles and the geniuses of one gender aren't being helped in order to help the other gender.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:57 PM
1

Stop gap might be coming with VR.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:37 PM
1

Then I bring up one small counter point; "Then why so many other feminist subs in the past?"
/r/MensRights16/06/15 11:44 AM
2

Which is why it's especially egregious, not only is he being held accountable for an opionion, it's actually closer to an observation - just one that "the narrative" doesn't like. This world is disgusting sometimes.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:01 AM
3

This is talked about in the War against boys book ... ... published in 2000.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:35 AM
13

Ask feminists, last time I checked, banned/deleted comments they didn't like either. Feminism, Feminisms, askfeminists, now they are up to FeMRADebates. It always devolves into the same echochamber hugbox where logic is offensive and providing factual citations is mansplaining.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:59 PM
2

Do Wives/Women have an obligation to get a tubal ligation? Do they owe that obligation to anyone? It's such bullshit. [edit] I don't want shots. I don't want an IUD. I don't want my tubes tied. I don't want patches. I don't want pills. I want to be done with this stage of my life. further it's sort of a thing of "ownership" - where she doesn't mind him having a permanent procedure that way he can't have kids with anyone else in case it falls apart. Sh It's selfish. She wants his tubes tied but n…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:26 PM
6

Never, because if they actually acknowledged it they wouldn't make the claim that more women than men are raped. The default feminist position is "it's men raping men - so we don't count it" and "they are in prison, they brought it upon themselves".
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:37 PM
1

Then they will just fill in the blanks by interpreting your "passive aggressiveness" as hostility, you will become unlikeable, and who knows, maybe an anonymous tip to HR will get you canned.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 02:31 PM
3

You are right. After reading your comment I immediately realized my mistake.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 09:23 AM
5

Absolutely, agree, society would come to a screeching halt and crumble if men, along with their seeming disposability - up and disappeared. I saw a few posts in this thread attacking the subject by trying to refute "dick is abundant and low value" or mock it. That's not the right tact to take and will lead those trying into an endless feedback loop of a losing argument because their starting principle is actually wrong. I was just trying to head that off at the pass.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:45 PM
7

Have you seen the "Self made man" interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip7kP_dd6LU Absolutely worth it, I want to read the book.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 08:03 PM
3

I agree. I was watching the news and it was obvious, if you read between the lines, that this was a result from a custody dispute. That he was mentally unstable doesn't discount it from being a mens rights issue, as a matter of fact I would say the opposite. And to people claiming "he didn't snap, he had a history of mental issues" -well, yeah, those are exactly the people who snap! And I'll say what everyone is thinking. "This is what happens when the laws are enforced the way they are being en…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:27 PM
34

The statement "dick is abundant and low-value" is figuratively correct in many schools of thought and in many ways interpreted. Example You only need 1 guy, not 100, to impregnate 100 women and deliver 100 babies in a year. It is impossible to take 1 woman and have 100 guys and achieve the same. This is just one aspect. Only 40% of all men who ever existed procreated, while that number rises to 80% for women. http://denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm Another avenue- Women are the gatekeepers to sex …
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:00 PM
2

She lost the primary to Obama, don't forget.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 06:24 PM
2

Women are not raped more. See: Prison rape.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 11:49 AM
1

they are designed to make convictions easier, not more accurate.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 11:33 AM
50

Maybe someone tied to one of the accusers has some pull and don't want any counter charges? I mean, if it turns out to be a conspiracy instead of just the "usual false accusation" - would it blow up into a big thing? I don't know the law well enough but it is odd.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 11:46 PM
2

Wait, what?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 05:36 PM
1

Did she not get the memo that cases of sexual violence and the like have been decreasing over the past few years? Violent crime has been constantly decreasing over time, but if you mean the memo that specifically sexual violence has decreased at a much larger rate than the general curve- I'm more willing to believe it just been more accurately reported in addition to law enforcement no longer automatically believing the "victim" See: Innocence project.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 05:35 PM
8

Watching this video you could see the proverbial red pill fall down his gullet. Watch it again, he isn't taking his stance at all to pander, just the opposite, he damn well knows the stance he is taking is "against the narrative" - but look at that, he was confronted with a situation where he had to sit up and really say "Ok, fuck it, I can't play the sharade anymore, it's bullshit." Which now means he is going to go back, over time, and re-evaluate all those other situations. The example scenar…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 05:32 PM
2

If he could do that I believe it's better than a 50% chance he wouldn't have fought it at all.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 02:36 PM
2

Sex Offenders Forced To Live Under Miami Bridge
/r/MensRights13/06/15 03:50 AM
3

Dear Zachary. Well, I hope not, but it still stands.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 02:31 AM
0

Not anymore since "reddit" has taken upon itself to be the arbiters of what is allowed and not allowed.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 02:23 AM
2

I've been reading the rest and it's making me angrier and angrier because this appears to be an English lit or political science packet for a college. I find it disgusting that colleges are even allowed to hang their hats on such work these days since they are the very nexus of most of this.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:37 AM
7

Started reading ^(I'll finish wanted to reply first) and yeah wow, chillingly uncanny. The comparison is bitter sweet though, hell, it even makes me angry if I dwell too long on it. Here we are, at the dawn of all these hypothetical dystopian futures where our attempt at cynical parody and hyperbole is matching up nearly perfectly with the proclamations of great minds of the past. When stories like that were written, their narratives were meant as allegorical warnings, not accurate predictions o…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:54 AM
40

Because that would end up with boys acting, playing, and socializing as boys and girls acting, playing, and socializing as girls. Can't have that, the narrative says all differences between boys and girls are purely societal constructs and any high academic theory pointing out the negatives of being a man and the universal positives of what it's like being a woman, while similtaneously being oppressed mean boys need to learn to not rape and girls need to not be bullied out of playing with their …
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:11 PM
2

they would eject the "offending" participants then accuse them of instigating any physical altercations.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:18 PM
1

That is a fare argument and I've seen it elsewhere - except reddit's creation was based on freedom of speech, further, not defending FPH, for example, pretty much condemns any subreddit that has a "non mainstream" set of ideas to being banned.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:35 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz6Vbl-TWgI It's 10 minutes but it goes by very quick and pretty much covers the entirety of my position. But if you want a "sound byte" 6:30-7:30 segment
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:16 PM
1

You shouldn't be glad because their behavior and views would be considered "more tame" by the perspective of those who had the power to ban them, than the behaviors of /r/MR are seen ass. Posting about an organized convention? -Conspiracy to brigade (In real life no less!) A call to protest or contact a PUBLIC representative? "DOXX". I don't know how long you have been around but /r/mensrights has long been considered a "thorn in reddits side" from the "SJW/Feminist" perspective. You need only l…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:01 PM
2

they did not, the only posting of Imgur employees staff portraits that were hosted publicly by Imgur themselves. No contact information was ever posted nor were there any calls to brigade, as a matter of fact an Imgur representative was in active contact with one of the moderators over at Fat People Hate up until the subreddit got banned. I witnessed all of this myself first hand. The harassment claims were baseless.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:54 PM
2

Fat People hate didn't doxx people or vote brigade either.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:44 PM
1

Oh, I know, definitely, wanted to frame it for readers, especially detractors who read what they want to read.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:22 PM
1

Have the parents emotionally coax/blackmail him into submitting. It's fucking chilling to think about.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:03 PM
7

I see a very near future where posting the "Women have always been the primary victims of war" quote will get you automatically banned/shadowbanned.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:00 PM
1

And the operative word here is "language" as they might say they have been banning on behavior, but that is patently false.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 12:59 PM
2

Side bar, right side, under "other stuff" "MRA User Reports" Here MRA User Reports Put that into a Ctrl-F (find) field and it will bring you to it. The two [Citations] link to lists of users.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:30 AM
2

No, it's still there, AMR is "AgainstMensRights" and I just checked after getting your message and it is up and running. 285 active right now. With only 7000 subscribers, it means it's a satellite subreddit joined at the hip to a much larger subreddit. /r/mr for example has almost 13 times as many subscribers but only about 40% more active right now.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:22 AM
28

Ages ago there was a user, I don't remember the specific name had "snake" in it, anyway he would spend all day going to the default subs looking for posts where he could "inject an MRA perspective" and would pose as someone who was a regular here. He would post the most hate mysoginistic and "sterotypical" (as described by feminists as to what an MRA is) vitriole possible. Why? Because he got two posts in on /r/mensrights before he was banned and he took great offense to it. He spent over a year…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:09 AM
6

No, it's still there. AMR was an acronym for AgainstMensRights. On the side bar, under "Other stuff" "MRA User reports" my name shows up under citation 2 #94. It's been there for years, my name and the link. A while ago someone from there wrote a script to scan /r/mensrights and catagorize the most active members and give them weight according to various criteria, I don't remember what, anyway - yeah There is that.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 10:52 PM
7

The thing about the Men's right's movement is that it existed before reddit and it would easily "regroup" in that, this isn't even the only or oldest portal, however it is currently the most popular. Not too concerned about it. Also, just look at /r/all
/r/MensRights10/06/15 10:11 PM
20

/r/AMR has a list of the most "Active" (gathered from a couple of years ago) users of /r/MensRights on their side-bar, I know, I'm on the list. The whole thing is hypocritical bullshit and the SJW's on the admin staff are just making up justifications that fit their personal narrative.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 09:26 PM
1

And arguably the more stigmatized half.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 08:18 PM
2

"better 1000 guilty go free than 1 innocent..."
/r/MensRights02/06/15 02:47 PM
15

Wait, ... wait. Then the second she finishes school with that GI bill, gets "bored" divorces, takes half of whatever is left, takes kids, gets child support, house, alimony. Ok, times are changing, maybe not alimony soon.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:26 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA0aKjY8K50
/r/MensRights16/05/15 10:26 PM
1

It's not the female protagonist that bothers me (in the least, don't care if it's male or female) It's that it has turned into a gender politics thing. I don't go to a pixar film wanting to see a documentary. When I am not in the mood for a documentary I'm not going to watch Fog of War. I've got a list of films I want to watch but I need to be in the mood to watch them. Upstream color and Nightcrawler and the last couple of episodes of breaking bad were like this. for Mad Max I was looking forwa…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:24 PM
1

This isn't bigger though. No where near as big.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:52 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8TqhBIEbWA
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:51 PM
3

Cool, awesome, this cheered up my day/week. I don't believe it wasn't "not" in the cards as the DICE/Anita thing was one of the first places she started getting attention and criticism. Do I believe they canceled the idea after fan backlash? Yes, absolutely. Do I think they never had the idea in the first place? No, not at all. The main reason? Because anytime a "Games are mysoginist" trope used to come up, tons of people would point out Mirrors edge as a really cool (albeit niche, first person …
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:20 PM
1

It is if you are making up different types of scotsmen on the fly in order to excuse their representing the scots.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:39 AM
-4

I'm not going to see it. I was looking forward to it but I just don't want to deal with the hassle. I'll catch it on DVD. Here is the thing, I'm all for Men's Rights but I tend to avoid for OR against BS in my media, I partake in it to escape this bullshit. Now, the initial "consulting" a feminist over the screenplay or whatever had me already on edge, but now, no, fuck no, nope, GTFO. not seeing. It's the same way I won't touch the new Mirrors Edge (AS consulted on it). I don't need my games or…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 10:06 PM
3

But the attention paid to the human trafficking numbers these statistics come from is like holding up the rolling stone U-Va situation as being the smoking gun proving that rape is a problem.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:08 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tQSOlF9ZZM
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:37 PM
1

Unfortunately this happens often enough. The "Game" and the girls got so much attention not because the game had some deep social commentary, or displayed any sort of innovative game design. They got so much attention simply because they were female. It fits into a narrative that the MSM is trying to put forth and certain ideologies want to bring attention to. "Women in tech". I was "coding" similar games on an old Amiga 2000 when I was 10-12 in an attic by myself because I wanted to learn codin…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:35 PM
5

And for years various members of this subreddit have maintained that we were held to a different set of standards obscured behind selective application of ambiguous interpretations of rules by the admins. This doesn't surprise me in the least, actually, it cheers me up because now we have evidence and it's "on the record" that someone, and probably many people "up stairs" sees the sub and "the movement" that way. "It wasn't all in our heads" -is a big morale boost.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:34 AM
13

They actually fully understand a guy has a dick and balls and that's why they make an issue of it as they know it won't affect women. It's setting up the false premise that men spreading their legs is some act of harassment or some sort of patriarichal territory marking, or some bullshit. Because it's bullshit it's really hard to defend against without sounding "Defensive" and there-by "sounding guilty". It set up so either guys agree with the feminists and are now held to an even stranger stand…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:32 PM
6

Her "flashback" was by far the most interesting character development in the entire thing. It had a really great "Bourne identity vs. Eastern Promises" vibe to it. Eh, whatever. I don't feel bad for Whedon as he had it coming.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:03 PM
9

Very long but very good and very related in-depth article from 7 years ago. It's worth the time to read as the vast majority of it is objective accounts and citations and itself is a fantastic resource to cut through "equality of outcome" political pandering. Women Firefighters: The Gender Boondoggle Excerpt: To prove its point, Los Angeles City Hall — just like Seattle, Miami, San Francisco, San Diego and other major cities, together with state governments — spent millions to recruit, train and…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 07:08 PM
3

Wow, a really poorly authored survey. I'm sorry. Thanks for the insight though.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:55 AM
8

It's because whoever wrote the survey applied the wrong system to "yes/no" questions. The Likert scale is supposed to be applied to a "make a statement, then ask how much the reader agrees with the statement" format. Not a "yes/no question/answer. And just because you remove a question mark from the end of a yes/no answer does not magically make it something else. Now the question is whether the student/creator of the survey was doing this on purpose to allow manipulation of the results, or they…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:35 AM
3

Down vote it, please. It's not the /r/mensrights in general is this leftist, it's that anything that leftist leaks into the mainstream /r/reddit and gets "oooh, weekend upvoted" by tourists. I'm lib leaning, generally prefer the lies of dems over the lies of republicans, but I REFUSE to vote for Hillary and very well may vote against her if she wins the primary. That said, -Republicans are just as bad, worse than most, just not worse than Hillary from my perspective.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:05 AM
8

That's just fucking heartbreaking. Circumcision should be like tattoos, not until you're 18 (so you then have to give informed consent)
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:37 PM
2

The wife can argue she was under duress to sign, cannot disprove what she "felt".
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:34 PM
2

She won't get fired because she wasn't the only one in on it, if she were to go down, she would take her bosses with her.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 09:35 AM
1

Each day I check in here and catch up on news and such, usually I get my "nope, done for the day" fill by maybe 2-3 pm eastern. I'm clocking out early. It's 10 past 11. I'll see you all tomorrow.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:10 PM
2

MGTOWs turned on Karen Straughan too. I do believe it, as a matter of fact her "rise" within the MRM was probably one of the things that pushed the rift. Most of what GWW has said to date was already said by others - but they were male voices so disregarded as self serving. Then comes along this very smart and sincere woman who came to the /r/mensrights subreddit and a couple other places... and started to ask questions. Initially she was viewed as a concern troll or sock puppet or some such, bu…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:30 PM
2

Eh, It's why I distance myself from a lot of the more... "internal political drama" especially between MGTOW's and AVFM - that's the thing, AVFM is not the end all be all of Men's rights, it itself is it's own "brand" of men's rights, one that is closer to the legislative core of the problems than MGTOW's are. The problem is, MGTOW's started to feed into the same bullshit as the PUA community to validate their own points, but in feeding at that bullshit trough, they've become their own mini-reli…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 12:22 PM
6

I fucking hope! My fear? She settles for the VP and locks it up for Hillary.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 12:01 PM
3

don't be disheartened. Look at the gamer gate thing blowing up and their numbers. It's directly tied to men's rights but seems to be a backlash towards the ideals that were fostered within feminism. give it time, there was a MRM before AVFM and there are plenty who are for men's rights and the issues but don't actually like AVFM. It's also if the movement isn't resting solely on the shoulders of "one organization". It makes it too easy to discredit. If you ever want to be cheered up, head over t…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 10:58 AM
1

I know
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:16 AM
4

The Men's Rights Movement does not begin and end at AVFM. Broaden your horizons a bit before tossing the baby out with the bathwater. That said, I'm glad AVFM is around, I just don't see "this" conference as some all encompassing affair.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:13 AM
12

To bookend your point. "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children." -The next President of the United States and leader of the "free world".
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:03 AM
0

If you listen to his podcasts (worth it if you have work to do and can do both at the same time) - he talks about it occasionally. He still thinks marriage is a raw deal but they had been together for a long time. She is on the show occasionally and seems "down to earth" rational. She gets the stuff, doesn't agree with all of it, but she is the kind that would hate the SJW's. If they do end up splitting one day he wouldn't be shocked and he would only blame himself. He doesn't say he was wrong o…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:09 AM
4

No, he is making fun of it on a level that the majority can relate to. He's a comedian first and something of an activist 3rd. Also the wage gap myth didn't become "semi" common knowledge until the last couple of years but has been argued about on the same terms for at least 15, maybe more. I suspect this was made well before that break as he currently has either a wife or serious GF and his act reflects that. This is an older act because he was single in it, or implied it. He still think marria…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:05 AM
2

Reported for use of Babelfish.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:31 PM
3

Oldschool HWL (enh) and main Healer (Druid/Shaman). All these easily offended outsiders have no fucking clue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5HygBlsl4U
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:14 PM
3

>"There are invariably more women than men in any university." FTFY
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:50 AM
29

Non-sequitur says "what?"
/r/MensRights29/03/15 02:21 PM
2

I would imagine Erin Pizzey or Angry Harry would be the best persons who would be able to get in touch with him as he interviewed them both back in, hell, I don't know at this point. I think before 2009. If you email Angry Harry and inquire I'd imagine he'd be able to send up a flare. I never met MWM but I was in off and on contact with him for a couple of years. The last I read of on his website he was pulling away from the MRM business and had to focus on life. At the time, IIRC, he was in a r…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:46 PM
17

I have never seen mansplaining use any other way than "I don't like what this person has to say so let me pull an insta-jargon strawman adhom and label him with it." I know what it'se meant to me, but I have never seen it used properly. I would wager the instances where it's used just as a baseless attack vs. used properly are somewhere in the 95:5 ratio, if not even more skewed.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:37 PM
0

It's because it is on /r/videos, any other mainstream sub it would have been deleted. Why? Because /r/videos is the only sub that hasn't had SRS take over moderation powers. It's also why it was the only sub that didn't delete the original "5 guys" gamer gate video while all others, even /r/games and /r/gaming were trying their hardest to suppress it. The comforting thing about this is that there are far more people on "our side" than appear on Reddit because of how pervasive SRS's co-opting of …
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:00 AM
15

Or have a 2 panel arranged veritcally. So first you read the Kampf-ified version, then the original. I think that would have the greatest effect.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:56 AM
3

That's the beauty of SJW's hysterics, they never for a second think it could be flipped back on to themselves. They are so over-sensitive, you could easily put on a Poe's Law suit and delve into their own past history and find SOMETHING that could just as easily be twisted with their logic against them.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:05 PM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m-e4PgiVfM
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:59 PM
76

It is being allowed, not because "TIL" isn't anti-MRA, it is, along with ask reddit, IAMA, off my chest, best of... and probably a few others. No, TIL is anti MRA when it can get away with it, but this submission's early comments are more aligned to the backlash against SRS and SJW's in general. That backlash has been growing and will continue to grow. People are sick of it.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 06:54 PM
10

It's obvious, but it needs to be said by "Reputable" sources. CH Sommers is a fantastic bridge between the various spheres of ideologies, and the mainstream. She knows all of this, she has known all of this for ages, most of us have, but stating it clearly, and every few years is necessary to supply "sources" that people can't dismiss as "that's a decade old". etc. The first time I saw CH Sommers speak it was at the Male studies Symposium in 2009. horrible web video, but her point, out of all of…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:57 PM
5

I dragged my sister kicking and screaming along with me in my interest of games over the years and while she has a busy life now she still loves them like a "true" gamer (she is very competitive and loves to shit talk). That said, other than her, female interest in gaming from teens in and outside of the US up until the late 90's early 2000's was so rare, I witnessed maybe 1 in 30 girls showing an interest in gaming at that time, if that.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 12:55 PM
4

The graduate programs are 70% male and 30% female. I'm not sure what that means.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:44 AM
2

Nice! And since TB is, well, already "doxxed" and DGAF... she doesn't have to worry about being doxxed.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:01 AM
6

Not very. Anonymous doesn't "threaten" to get results, they just "do". Threats of doing are something an organized individual would come up with. The whole thing is Bullshit. If anonymous had anything to threaten with, they wouldn't threaten with it, they would just release it.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 06:21 PM
15

man, women are all just after us Women =/= Feminism or Feminist. Posts that generalize women tend to get downvoted on /r/mr.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:17 PM
1

No. All blood donations are tested. Generally they are not tested individually, instead they are tested in batches where 6+ samples will be mixed together then tested at once. I don't recall the formula to calculate the batch size but it has to do with the market/area, time of year, blood bank reserve amount, and current trend of testing positive/negative from various batches. the idea is to play the numbers to end up clearing more blood faster, doing less work, and keeping costs down. So say a …
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:55 PM
22

Criticism isn't bashing. Far too many think it is.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:54 PM
2

He'd rather downvote because of feels.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:34 PM
2

To hell with that, I'll call out any cunt who's being a cunt, and tell her what a stupid cunt she's being. And you don't get deleted or banned for doing so, pretty much everywhere else that is equally popular as this subreddit would not allow you to speak your mind as freely as you are able to here. Something that a lot of critics of /r/mr conveniently ignore.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:42 PM
2

Further, tone policing does not happen, it just gets brought up constantly by those who would want to. And because the board has a strict policy of allowing downvotes decide instead or a delete or banhammer, yes, you see a lot of "concern" threads - but that comes with the very impressive freedom to say what you want. Even things that are not directly related are allowed to sink via downvotes and their own merits. outsiders, and even now communities like PUA and MGTOW wish to portray the MR subr…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:40 PM
5

he burden of proof for a conviction is much higher than the 2-8% analysis of false reporting, because they went by the standard somewhere around "substantial evidence". Absolutely disagree with this statement. Proof of a false accusation is much harder as it is, at it's core, proving a negative. It's much harder to prove a false accusation was false than a true accusation was true.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 09:11 PM
0

That's fine, my point is that anyone thinking "someone else will do it, I can't" - well, everyone thinks that.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 06:56 PM
14

"Your honor, under 6th amendment purview I ask that this case be dismissed as I, myself, the representation of my client simply cannot proceed as the subject matter in this case is too triggering to me and might bring about a fainting spell."
/r/MensRights17/12/14 03:45 AM
-1

That's fair, but it seems the OP is stating "not my problem, someone else do it" - I would have kept myself quite in that respect and reflect on what I could do- not what I couldn't and move on from there. I absolutely agree with the issue of risk of being painted with the misogyny brush, but that's not how OP represented the situation, had he said that were the reason why he wasn't pursuing, I would have upvoted and moved on- because I agree.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 03:40 AM
7

It was made in 2009, he had an entire series of about 59 videos (about that length) enumerating all the MRA issues up to that point. There are some mistakes with the videos, but as a whole they are insanely valuable as they cover -everything-. He even conducted interviews with Erin Pizzey and Angry harry at the time. The one I linked was just his most popular- It also ties directly to the issue in this thread.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:29 AM
6

Men don't exist. - ManWomanMyth
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:16 AM
0

The hell it has been. The essence of trolling existed before the internet - it was called passive aggressiveness.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:11 AM
3

Like the President of the United state during a state of the union? Yeah - it will take a while when we are dismantling thinking that is that deep seated. Thread starter isn't very broad in their understanding of the issues.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:09 AM
9

Hopefully another pissed off student will start a group. I'm pretty discouraged and no longer feel like I'm part of the George Brown College community. It is amazingly rare for college bound students to even be aware of the Men's Rights Movement, let alone be sympathetic about it (this is changing quickly with internet memes and gamergate exposing the MRM in a positive light). Chances are if you don't do it, no one will for the foreseeable future. That no one outside of the movement returned you…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:06 AM
6

Side bar, two of the suggested reading books are from her.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 11:55 PM
12

Fantastic 2008 exposé by LA Weekly about this very issue, but as it pertained to Los Angeles. How much of a waste of money and time it was- and the technical issues involved. It's about 9 pages but it's worth every word. Women Firefighters: The Gender Boondoggle City Hall's dream of recruiting more females is a multimillion-dollar disaster
/r/MensRights15/12/14 01:52 PM
2

Found it on youtube for you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Hb3oe7-PJ8
/r/MensRights15/12/14 02:25 AM
13

A fantastic Harvard debate between Steven Pinker and Elizabeth Spelke not of whether or not this is true - this isn't disputed in higher academic fields, but why it is true. http://edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html If I recall correctly it was a 2 hour debate, but I thoroughly enjoyed it. Found it on youtube (missing from link) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Hb3oe7-PJ8
/r/MensRights14/12/14 10:30 PM
4

"My So-Called Wife" - The author implies it's always been this way, it has not. Both husband and wife working pretty much the same amount of time with the same amount of relative effort was common in the late 1800s early 1900s. Modern appliances and the proliferation of an electrical grid (especially refrigeration) buttressed with an automation and mechanization of the agriculture benefited one gender far more than another. See you in 100 years is a great book for some of this insight (not a gen…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 02:14 PM
17

And there is a related story about a wife being charged with negligent homicide for the death of the husband who asked her to give him a sherry enema as he couldn't drink it normally. LAKE JACKSON - Investigators say a Lake Jackson woman caused her husband's death by giving him a sherry enema, leading to alcohol poisoning. The enema caused his blood alcohol level to soar to 0.47 percent — almost six times the legal intoxication limit, a toxicology report showed.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 11:50 PM
1

No, they know and understand perfectly fine, at least most of the professional Feminists, they just outwardly lie in both action and comments because it's their only recourse. Why do you think Anita Sarkeesian kills her comment section and the voting, and refuses to debate CH Sommers? AS would love to have her comment section open if all it was going to be flooded with was misogyny, it would be her own personal well of victim hood. No, what she is preventing from happening is full, eloquent and …
/r/MensRights13/12/14 10:45 AM
6

They did worse than ignore it, there has been various and innumerable "junk science" "studies" that have steered social policy making and even legislative language and direction based on lies. Dear colleague letter - A direct result of feminist pressure backed by rape hysteria supported by a fundamentally flawed foundation of lies.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:29 PM
2

He's actually not responding to you, he is just hijacking the top comment in a stickied post in order to spam his site, he has been doing this (and getting banned for it) for over 3 years.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:33 AM
2

I've always said that /r/mensrights is a border town to the "manosphere" - it's not about what can or cannot be discussed (more is better of course) but it is about outsiders being exposed to an easy to engage presence. It just so happens that /r/mensrights has grown to the point where it has become "the" place on the net for aggregate MRA. The relatively small amount of bias Admin interference is a pittance to pay for what the subreddit has facilitated in happening.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:28 PM
34

Rape culture does exist, just not in the form the feminist narrative wants everyone to believe, and it is in the truest sense of "cultural" in that it is "expected" as part of the punishment by the general populace and even joked about approvingly.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:05 PM
8

What will and has "helped" this one is how deep The Rolling Stone is in with it. Other outlets (esp Washington Post) are keeping on it not necessarily to discredit Jackie, but to discredit The Rolling Stone's 9 page exposé.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:07 AM
1

The key here is it's not really Mainstream news reporting on an issue that brings to light men's issues - they are reporting on a screwup of a major publication - THAT'S why it's getting so much traction. Blood in the water to dog-pile on Rolling Stone -It's the New Republic/Stephen Glass all over again (Interestingly the Stone writer is connected to Glass). You are right in that men's issues don't get attention but you are wrong that this issue won't get attention because it's not about men's i…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:00 AM
4

You missed out on the taxi-cab lies (for a fare).
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:37 AM
3

I give you the Gish Gallop.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 05:45 PM
1

The Boynton Women's Club is down the street from me, it is along my daily run.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 09:48 AM
1

Oh baby, feel the unadulterated oppressions.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 05:50 AM
2

See, you don't get it. Separating boys from girls so the boy's learning environments can be catered to their gender specifically (more hands on and interactive, among other things) is sexist. Separating girls from boys so the curriculum stays the same but boy's nature will no longer be a disturbance to all the girls trying to get into stem fields from K-12, is progressive! You almost missed the sleight of hand. They won't be looking to change the curriculum to cater to different kinds of learnin…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 03:54 AM
3

Very good analogy that illustrates, what I believe is the biggest advantage women have. They need to invest very little if anything to be in the position to get offers. Sure, if they do invest anything as far as resources or time the amount of offers they get might explode and get better in quality or whatever, but just being female comprises the lion's share of an attribute that allows them to passively "not work" to being given offers - genetic lottery aside.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 03:47 AM
1

I wonder how much of this is required and how much of this is by choice. I also wonder how many of these women would be barred from coming to work dressed like this[1] or this[2] . Anyone claiming women's formal wear is more expensive than men's is full of shit and they mean to suggest that $800 pumps and a $2000 purse are required. Aren't men expected to mix up their suits? If a man only owns one suit and wears it every day, it's a bit odd. I'd say, a minimum is a 3-4 suit spread to avoid the "…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:19 AM
2

My sister and I worked in the same industry for a time and formal wear was required by both genders. Female formal wear is an order of magnitude cheaper - and it's much more flexible as you can mix/match many outfits without problem. With male formal wear, not only is a suit a complete unit (if you ruin either pants or jacket, entire thing is shot) - but you even "have" to match shirt and tie to some degree - or tie and suit, it depends on the ensemble, there are more than a handful "faux pas" i…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:11 AM
2

This is nothing new, "Men don't Exist"
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:58 AM
2

Disagree. A lot of the meat and potatoes of the MRM is very dry reading. It goes to the issue of conventional wisdom vs. Concision. What's the law? To find the right answer on the internet post a wrong answer? "Clickbait" titles are read just as much because people want to call bullshit on the content as much as they want to see the drama. The biggest clickbait title of the few years? "Obamacare".
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:57 PM
25

If she was able to "reclaim" (this implies it was never about trivial BS, even a bit - White feather campaign anyone?) - The movement would be 1/10th the size it is now. Feminism will never let this happen the same way they rebuffed and ignored CH. Sommers information about policy data being false back in the early 2000's.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 02:32 AM
29

Brock was released with a few conditions, including that he remain in the state, not possess firearms and not use drugs. A new trial was scheduled for February, but it wasn't clear prosecutors would proceed with it, given that the girl's story was the primary evidence against him. This angers me greatly because the injustice carries on, just to a "lesser" degree. Washington state adopted a law last year allowing wrongly convicted defendants to be reimbursed $50,000 for each year of incarceration…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 02:28 AM
8

This goes over so many people's heads in the same way society in general feels the rape of a woman is a worse crime than the murder of a man.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 09:38 PM
5

Treat 'em like girls instead of little monsters and maybe it'll even out. How about we try and treat them like boys instead of little monsters? -I get your point and agree with it, but as you can see even you view boys behavior as negative instead of inherently boy. Being male and acting like it isn't inherently bad. Aggressive isn't bad, aggressiveness directed to harm is. Competitiveness isn't inherently good, Competitive focus directed at harming other people can easily be bad. Society has th…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:54 PM
3

Qualifications: Several, and I mean SEVERAL hours of playing games.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:16 PM
5

Well that depends. On a scale of 1-10, 1 being a little, 10 being a lot, how barefoot is your wife? On a scale of 1-10, 1 being a little, 10 being a lot, how pregnant is your wife? On a scale of 1-10, 1 being a little, 10 being a lot, how often do you beat you wife? /s
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:02 PM
9

Newborn account coming in to purportedly know "whats wrong and how we can fix it" with the Men's Rights Movement. Winning the PR battle shouldn't be difficult. It only requires a conscious effort and some introspection. it doesn't require different content or selling out our beliefs. It only requires speaking more charismatically. If you have been around longer than a couple of months and have been paying attention to various timelines you would know the MRM is winning the PR battle, slowly, but…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 08:51 PM
3

There is a lawfirm advertized down here in Florida that specializes in male client (divorce mainly).
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:03 PM
5

Rape culture does exist, just not in the way most realize. "prison joke" might as well be synonymous with "rape joke". Further, more than a handful see the ubiquitous rape that can happen in US prisons as "part of the punishment" when someone is convicted. -That's rape culture.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 12:00 AM
3

TRUE equality One more point from much higher in the discussion train. "True equality" There are many kinds of equality and there are two major kinds that are the dividing point between Mens Rights Activists and Feminists. "Equality of opportunity" and "Equality of outcome" With sexual dimorphism the two are mutually exclusive. Men's rights believes in the former as to support the latter actually does support oppression as you need a finger on a scale somewhere so everything comes out equal. Equ…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 11:47 PM
4

No apology needed and don't take my point of view as gospel. I wasn't trying to really refute your assertion I was pointing out a history I knew rather well. My ears perked up when you mentioned "Factual feminist" a moniker she only recently adopted (less than a year old?). There are tons of people who call themselves feminists without actually understanding feminist theory, it's tennants and political structure. There are people happily calling themseves feminist because they look it up in the …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 10:42 PM
10

"The factual feminist" Aka Christina Hoff Sommers has long been a hero of the Men's Rights Movement. a couple of her books are in the sidebar under suggested reading and she was one of the voices that turned me onto the Mens Rights Movement with her "War against boys" Atlantic Article (that turned into the book) from over a decade ago. The book is amazing. She is also "kicked out of the club". The majority of feminists shun her and don't see her as a feminist for betraying the sisterhood (it's i…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 09:53 PM
27

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey Erin Patria Margaret Pizzey (born 19 February 1939) is an English family care activist and a novelist. She became internationally famous for having started one of the first[2] women's refuges (called women's shelters in Canada and the U.S.) in the modern world, Chiswick Women's Aid, in 1971,[3] the organisation known today as Refuge.[1] Pizzey has been the subject of death threats and boycotts because of her research into the claim that most domestic viol…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 08:10 PM
1

This is a year old NSFW-ish, and you are not prepared.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:58 PM
1

I forgot about law, I myself cannot speak to its standards.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:43 PM
3

Most colleges, even prestigious ones are a complete joke in just about any field outside of stem... and Business. All other subjects are treated with a "but what do you think" veneer of a social net against failure. All opinions, no matter how idiotic are treated with equal respect and validity. Marks, beyond grammatical check-boxes, are based on how passionate you are toward your idea, not how well you delivered it or how logically sound it is. Basically the "everyone is a winner" attitude has …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:36 PM
1

That would be "false attempted murder" accusations, and those happen all the time (the accusation, not the charged with making it) it's called VAWA and telling the police your boyfriend beat you and you are in fear for your life. If you mean "False murder accusation" verbatim, well... there would be at the very least a missing person otherwise... it's really easy to disprove. "My ex-Girlfriend killed.... um, her best friend!" And then the best friend would need to vanish without a trace for it t…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 08:40 AM
1

What are your educational qualifications? The more prestigious they are, the more mainstream the outlet you can give it to. But in this day and age most start by creating a blog where you would publish it. Maybe also use it as something of a script and make a video presentation of it to accompany. Most people have grown accustomed to absorbing their media content through video. If you notice almost all gaming reviews on major sites now have both a written review and a video review, usually being…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:33 AM
2

I'm not saying get angry, by quip I mean playfully retort then use it as an opener to discuss the issue seriously.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:10 AM
1

I meant in the larger population sense. What % of the population do 99% of the stars in movies made each year represent?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:09 AM
1

Totally understandable, it's not my place to insist such a stance as it is definitely a personal choice/position. Does your wife at least know of your perspective?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:30 AM
2

To take this a bit further, because of those restrictions there are fewer female roles, and so the competition for those fewer roles is greater... there for the wage would be lower. And at "Star" levels, it's about individual names far more than it is about gender. You can't just replace Johnny Depp with any other male actor. Anthony Hopkins, Brad Pitt, etc. etc. I wonder how many roles Sandra Bullock actually turns down? It's a balancing act and yes, there is a divide along gender lines, but it…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:56 AM
6

I would have quipped something back with a serious explanation of the issue I took kicker. Staying silent won't change anyone's mind, and if you can't share your perspective with your own family, who can you share it with? All of my family and all of my friends know very well my political beliefs in this realm and they do not at all hold it against me, our friendships, or their opinion of me. Not all agree with it, but everyone respects it. The key is to explain "your side". I can laugh at "male…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:38 AM
0

Pop song in the states about Fat Acceptance and how big girls are sexy. It's a catchy tune and it uses "Bass" and "Treble" to denote "Fat" and "thin". People don't pickup on this the first coupled times hearing the song. "It's all about the Bass, no Treble" is essentially the chorus with the verses talking about Fat body acceptance "opinion".
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:26 AM
1

This particular poster has been around for years on this forum and has long guised his spam advertizements as legitimate posts. Soliciting and advertizing and spamming on the subreddit is against the rules. He was warned dozens of times over the years and now the mods just take a zero tolerance policy with him, he attempts to frame this as censorship. If the poster actually made contributions that did not lead directly to a website trying to sell you something, and his specific site at that, the…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:19 AM
1

Actually a bit more interesting of an interview than I thought it would be. A good piece to have running in the background as a podcast if you are doing work.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 10:47 PM
7

The beginning of the end was when CNN started referring to Tweets live for topical direction. The second that happened I haven't payed attention to them since. I don't think I've read one of their articles or visited their site in years now.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:17 AM
3

Ignore it, it's a PUA/scam/let me sell you an Ebook website run by emotionally and socially stunted misogynists. They are barred from posting here so they keep making newborn accounts and spamming their propaganda. They have been doing this literally for years.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:55 AM
3

This is because being a feminist is out of fashion, and even the college generation is getting wind of this (see Time fiasco).
/r/MensRights18/11/14 08:44 PM
5

May 1st, 2000 The research commonly cited to support claims of male privilege and male sinfulness is riddled with errors. Almost none of it has been published in peer-reviewed professional journals. Some of the data turn out to be mysteriously missing. A review of the facts shows boys, not girls, on the weak side of an education gender gap. The typical boy is a year and a half behind the typical girl in reading and writing; he is less committed to school and less likely to go to college. In 1997…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 08:30 AM
1

I did a little digging and throwing in an "" exact string quote into google hit on a paper hosted at www.springer.com 5th entry down The PDF is titled "New Directions in Gender Role Conflict Research" -The opening (abstract? isn't specified) reads "Gender role confl ict (GRC) is defi ned as a psychological state in which the socialized male gender role has negative consequences for the person and others (O’Neil 2008a ). GRC occurs when rigid, sexist, or limiting gender roles result in restrictio…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:26 AM
3

I did a little digging and throwing in an "" exact string quote into google hit on a paper hosted at www.springer.com 5th entry down The PDF is titled "New Directions in Gender Role Conflict Research" -The opening (abstract? isn't specified) reads "Gender role confl ict (GRC) is defi ned as a psychological state in which the socialized male gender role has negative consequences for the person and others (O’Neil 2008a ). GRC occurs when rigid, sexist, or limiting gender roles result in restrictio…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:23 AM
2

I did a little digging and throwing in an "" exact string quote into google hit on a paper hosted at www.springer.com 5th entry down The PDF is titled "New Directions in Gender Role Conflict Research" -The opening (abstract? isn't specified) reads "Gender role confl ict (GRC) is defi ned as a psychological state in which the socialized male gender role has negative consequences for the person and others (O’Neil 2008a ). GRC occurs when rigid, sexist, or limiting gender roles result in restrictio…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:22 AM
1

I did a little digging and throwing in an "" exact string quote into google hit on a paper hosted at www.springer.com 5th entry down The PDF is titled "New Directions in Gender Role Conflict Research" -The opening (abstract? isn't specified) reads "Gender role confl ict (GRC) is defi ned as a psychological state in which the socialized male gender role has negative consequences for the person and others (O’Neil 2008a ). GRC occurs when rigid, sexist, or limiting gender roles result in restrictio…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:21 AM
2

Then why is it stickied? You know I'm a general regular on these forums, let me state I never participate in these surveys. Stating as much further skews the data to those who do take the survey to not represent this forum's users or the "MRA" in general. Surveys in general on this subreddit should honestly be barred since more often than not they are gamed by detractors to paint /r/mensrights and its participants in a false light.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:03 AM
3

The easiest thing to sell to any human is that whatever is wrong in their life isn't actually their fault.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 04:13 AM
2

I can imagine it, with the classic Christopher Hitchen's smirk as you deliver the apology. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S692f1tnuQ
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:32 AM
6

Erin Pizzey, The very first person to open a woman's shelter turned around shortly after and attempted to open the very first men's shelter. Read up on what happened then http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey She has done a few IAMA's on reddit and is actually an MRA and occasionally writes for AVFM. She was also at the AVFM Men's Rights Conference.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:16 AM
9

Meanwhile back on shore.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:41 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4hNaFkbZYU
/r/MensRights07/11/14 06:15 AM
14

And I've been told by military vets that the concept of "Triggers" isn't something that needs to be labeled with warnings, just the opposite, it's part of therapy for the one suffering from PTSD to learn to recognize something that is triggering and learn to cope with it, not avoid it. "Trigger warnings" are actually counter productive to those who would theoretically need them and are really just a veiled mechanism for censorship.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:06 PM
8

Only Women can teach other Women that killing their own children is bad.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:02 PM
1

Welcome to Tumblr!
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:38 PM
3

That's a shame.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 09:32 AM
5

Yeah, that sort of thing really does hinder your employment opportunities. "Litigious" is a radioactive trait in any career and that's even for legitimate reasons. If you factor in something as stupid as a logo, well, add "batshit crazy" to the list. Would you hire her - even if she worked for free?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:56 AM
36

And society and culture has, through the ages seen male vulnerability as pathetic when it's voiced or displayed. "#stiffUpperLip #bandPlayedOn #WomenAndChildren1st. So not only does feminism have a general momentum and a pretty ubiquitous foundation in any first world society, especially in the legislative sense, they have eons of culture driving home their "theme". See: The man flu. It's a total farce and yet it's a common trope that gets paraded around, among other things (bumbling idiot dad).…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:10 PM
10

She is quickly turning into the Rush Limbaugh of Feminism.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:37 AM
9

"Where have all the good men gone?"
/r/MensRights25/10/14 04:55 AM
14

My sister cringes when she sees photos of herself from when she was in High School (adult now). She can't believe how slutty she looked nearly 24/7 (and she never got sent home for dresscode). You can tell on some girls when they are between the ages of ~15 (sometimes younger) and second year of college (whatever that might be). During that period they don't know yet about the world and go through this hyper-sexuality litmus test to figure out where the boundaries are. It's beyond just being fas…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 05:15 AM
5

yeah, the article has been around in one form or another on these boards for at least 4 years. It's from a professor at one of the Florida colleges. The original link is dead but it's good to see it brought up again. I've read it many times. I think the first time I heard of it was from Christina Hoff Sommers presentation during the 2009 male studies emporium (where I first heard of her too! 0Saw her speak. I read her atlantic articles for a few years but didn't follow the name.) Also, "sup!" /f…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:13 AM
3

Look up "it's my privilege" series - you probably already know about it, but to the audience. It's fantastic biting satire.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 08:29 PM
0

and isn't into some swinger bullshit? Dude, stop shaming her sexuality, you are oppressing her!
/r/MensRights19/10/14 10:12 AM
2

Previous generations of feminists convincing them that they are perpetual victims. Being eternally a victim of something out of your control gives you the in-built excuse to blame all your problems on something else. It's very psychologically alluring and appeals to human nature.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:01 AM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey Pizzey set up a women's refuge in Belmont Terrace, Chiswick, London where abused women were offered tea, vindaloo, sympathy and a place to stay for them and their children. She later opened a number of additional shelters despite hostility from the authorities. Pizzey's crucial pioneering work and determined campaigning was widely praised at the time. In 1975 MP Jack Ashley stated in the House of Commons that, "The work of Mrs. Pizzey was pioneering work …
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:08 PM
1

My sister actually made it as an artist (she sells her painting for anywhere between 5-10k). I learned a thing or two from her while helping her through her degree. There are a shit ton of "not well known" female artists that make it a point to use their menstrual blood in all manner of ways. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/26/menstrual-blood-art-carina-ubeda_n_3499027.html That was one set that I found while looking for another piece for you (of a woman standing in a ballet pose and a red…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:50 PM
2

I'm going to tell you to do what I tell every father in similar situations. This has nothing to do with your legal case but it will help and be a valuable resource. When you have the chance, try to very soon go out and get a journal and a refillable writing instrument. The journal is for you to write to your daughter, whenever you want about whatever you want. It shouldn't be used to talk about mom- keep her out of it (trash talking and such). But otherwise, have at it. Anytime a thought of her …
/r/MensRights18/10/14 08:40 AM
5

Men Don't Exist
/r/MensRights18/10/14 01:49 AM
6

While I have absolutely no love of Anita Sarkeesian, I actually strongly doubt she was responsible for the threat. She is after all attacking gamers and they themselves can be pretty - damn - ruthless. Do I put it beyond her to do something like this? No, definitely not, but do I think some gamers would beat her to the punch? Odds are more than likely.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 11:40 PM
3

Shadow banned =/= banned. Shadowbanned is something we only know of Reddit site admins being able to do and it doesn't prevent you from posting. It does the opposite, it allows you to post anything you want, but those posts don't show up for other people so you won't know you are banned immediately. The only people who can "see" your posts at that time are you and moderators of the specific subreddits you post in as your posts come up as flagged posts that need approval. It's how Nicemod here al…
/r/MensRights17/10/14 10:51 PM
2

Having its issue featured and debated in media outlets like Time magazine and discussed on news programs.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 05:21 PM
2

Fuck, gaming (being swatted) probably has more legitimate concern from death threats than AS does.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 05:43 AM
6

I understand where you are coming from, but the MRM didn't get where it is today by being polite. Being polite didn't work. There is a reason why AVfM floated to the "top", over, lets say, a good men project.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 02:31 AM
18

Feminism, and feminist =/= women. Misogyny means the hatred of women.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 02:00 AM
17

Good. It's so baseless, the more they make these wild accusations the more people will realize what's really going on. It seems like it stinks until you realize they've been trying to paint the MRM with this kind of Brush for quite a while now. Each time they do it backfires in their faces.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:48 AM
0

And it's that constant exodus that will keep the core of feminism the same.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 08:37 PM
1

Nah, the number 1 athletic difference between men and women, even beyond height and muscle mass is lung capacity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lung_volumes
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:43 AM
1

No 90 year old says that, it's Family Guy's play on what an "old guy would say" and has been adopted by internet culture as a meme.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:26 PM
3

Nah, I don't give credit for someone who has been an asshole all their lives and then all of a sudden regrets it in their 11th hour. They can change, that's fine, good for them, but it's only good for them and no one else. It's also a result of something they themselves have lost or could possibly gain.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 03:42 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdkLvzgfVNQ
/r/MensRights12/10/14 05:07 PM
2

Can confirm all this. Had a BPD Ex. Run like the fucking wind, they are inherently evil.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 01:09 AM
6

They are calling your bluff (Partly grew in in NH).
/r/MensRights10/10/14 10:20 PM
1

So that makes it ok?
/r/MensRights10/10/14 02:50 PM
3

As you can imagine no-one that sleeps with a stripper at her hen night broadcasts it, or at least they try to take their secret to the grave. So this is common? Common enough that their is an etiquette and "what is expected" from the "culture" (I'm assuming for guys too)? And by culture, I don't mean Spain, I mean stag/bachelor/bachelorette/hen parties.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 12:30 PM
2

I'd think someone at a voice for men would have a copy.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 09:50 PM
57

Yes there are, actually, most of 2xc before the SRS/feminist mods got involved (about 1.5 years ago now) was a fantastically balanced place where rational discourse about such subjects were the norm, not the exception. Since then it's gone steadily downhill. I don't think the majority have changed, although I am sure some left the places. But the moderation team has become more ideological, and so they can control the tone of the board passively, and have.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 08:07 PM
14

Because the President of the United states brings up the old trope as recently as his last State of the Union.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 05:57 PM
15

Brimble will be placed on the sex offenders register for eight years, be assessed and treated for any mental health condition, take part in offender treatment programs and has lost her career as a teacher. That's the first time I've ever heard of a time limit on being listed on the registry... I'm guessing it only common to a particular gender.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 05:44 AM
8

Dave Chapelle
/r/MensRights09/10/14 05:28 AM
5

I was expecting a manhood academy video from the downvotes, finished it and I'm still not sure.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 09:39 PM
3

Welcome back! I haven't seen you in a long while.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 01:48 AM
2

The scariest part of the whole ordeal is that it was her continuous piling on and escalating of the story that helped his vindication. Had she been more subtle and kept the stories more subdued he would still be under charges and/or be in prison. Or, at best, "forced to retire/leave the profession". A smarter sociopath could very easily frame a male teacher in the current state of the western world. It was her screw-up that vindicated him, it wasn't anything that he did as he couldn't prove a ne…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:44 PM
2

Billie Holiday - Strange Fruit (Ty A.)
/r/MensRights27/09/14 12:52 AM
5

Meh, the comments section has simply devolved into "this is the extreme and rare kind of feminism that isn't true feminism." It's great that MRM issues get more visibility lately, but the perception of MRM issues is the same.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:56 PM
13

Complete slimeball. 10:30, she had him, he interrupts, pivots and breaks for commercial. Anytime she doesn't let herself get painted into a corner, he "resets" the engagement by having to "move on" despite wanting to dwell on things (Opening "your one anecdotal example) when he thinks he has her trapped. What a dishonest asshole. This is why I am so absolutely happy that Karen has the foresight to record her over the phone interviews and publishes them. Don't ever fall away from that habit GWW, …
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:03 AM
2

I saw it when it first came out as well. I speak from personally witnessing it, not from hearsay.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 08:40 PM
4

It doesn't take talent to do what she does, just gall.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 07:05 PM
1

No, it was at first, it always has been, they just have had to up the rhetoric as time goes by. A voice for men was around before A good men project. A good men project was created to try and whitewash feminism's culpability concerning the state men find themselves in. It was an attempt to co-opt the Men's Rights movement and from the very beginning it was a whitewash campaign.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 07:02 PM
7

I love that Karen records interviews (that I know of) and publishes them after. It's a simple but brilliant way to keep them honest. I also find them far more interesting than the usually editorialized "final" versions. [Edit] Just finished watching listening to it. I'd say a big "no" to twitter. I know Karen knows this... but for anyone who might not; Concision. The MRM is fighting conventional wisdom, 140 pages wouldn't be enough in reality let alone 140 characters. Fantastic interview, I real…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:22 AM
2

Because men don't exist.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:12 AM
1

Mandatory in the sense that if there is nothing wrong with either parent. It's not saying "All cases" like if the father or mother for that matter have a provable substance abuse problem or other issues. This is just regular John and Jane off the street who want a divorce. Make it standard that both have equal time with their kids as a starting point in Divorces. I think it's something north of 85% of cases go to the mother. Contested cases it's even higher, ~94% IIRC.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 10:51 PM
2

It says it in the original link toward the end. While child support is an issue Men's rights wants to tackle, it's honestly a separate issue to child visitation. The brief I linked also implies that Parental Alienation Syndrome (brain washing the kid to hate dad) is just a myth. The position of NOW is that fathers don't care about their kids or their well being, they just care about money and one way to reduce the amount of money they have to fork over is with presumptive 50/50. What it really i…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:01 PM
1

You're welcome. I've personally seen more than just the above over the years. This was a known issue before GWW popularized it in one of her videos. Anytime State legislation (it's usually state, and it's also why it is easily "not paid attention to) of this vein comes up Feminists fight very hard to do two things. 1. Make it a republican/conservative issue so they can lean on partisan politics to quash it, and 2. Make it a "the fathers are just trying to get out of paying money" issue. They act…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:41 AM
6

There is an aspect of the ebb and flow of reddit as well as this sub that you probably don't realize that some vets know. Anything "hardcore Men's rights" issue only gets between 30-60 upvotes. Probably about how many daily "MRAs" that understand both the importance and issues. Anything more than about 100 upvotes have drawn in the attention of lurkers and has to be both catchy and sucinct. Anything more than ~500 votes has broken well outside of the subreddit itself and is being upvoted by peop…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:50 PM
2

First one I found from them. http://www.nownys.org/leg_memos/oppose_s1349.htm Usually how this goes is that they misrepresent the legislation in order to justify opposing it.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 10:56 PM
1

If the education was a bit better I'd say Hawaii would be the absolute best place to raise a kid culturally in the US. -And the education, at least at the time, was still great, I just know there are States/counties with more resources.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:22 AM
1

I grew up on the Big Island (Laupahoehoe), corroborating whites are a minority in Hawaii.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:21 AM
2

I honestly don't think it's that. I don't think he would care about pissing off feminists (he pisses of plenty of people). I think he thinks the dictionary definition of feminism is what others are critical about. At the end of his video the concept of Social Jusitce Warrior, and the kind of people they are (oversensitive knee-jerk advocates who believe everything should be censored for the sake of individual feelings). - He thinks they are actually fighting for some objective sense of justice, …
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:40 AM
1

Watch his latest episode and decide for yourself. It's funny because he actually makes the statement "just because I am not a fan of feminist frequency, does not mean I hate women". It's watching someone jump from logic to emotional reasoning and back again over and over. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition/9695-Quit-Using-The-Term-Social-Justice-Warriors
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:10 AM
3

http://consad.com/index.php?page=an-analysis-of-reasons-for-the-disparity-in-wages-between-men-and-women United States Department of labor commissioned Study. Much better than any other source. What was that? "2009" you say? Yup, it's been around that long, despite that Obama still parroted the 77 cent figure at the state of the union. Go him.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:36 PM
8

Who wants odds that the poster will be banned and the submission will be deleted?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:34 PM
-1

Ok.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:30 PM
0

I never specifically named Thunderf00t, you assumed that. Uhh, you directly proposed the challenge by replying to a statement about them.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:20 PM
19

Ask them what they think about presumptive 50/50 custody with no "primary custodian" and the abolishment of both alimony and child support as a standard as a result. Because NOW fights against any sort of custody reform where healthy suitable fathers would get equal time.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:17 PM
1

You could actually spin this as a reason to have more women Unfortunately, no, or rather, the alternate won't get anything different done. Women like women more than men like men.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:57 PM
-2

Your argument and points don't make any sense. I question whether GWW or Thunderfoot actually directly insult anyone, I'd like to see the clip if they do. You seem to be making a much larger thing out of this than I believe is actually there.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:54 PM
5

On a more evolutionary level, both men and women will have more reproductive success if their offspring have varied genetic makup than uniform. All other things being equal, having two offspring from two different fathers if you are female or two different mothers if you are male is better than having two offspring from a single mate. Essentially genetic diversification. It is this combined with the "male invest" concept that is the nexus for cheating. There is more to it than just that, but it'…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:40 PM
1

Oh, my reading comprehension is off. You are in support of, not against my general position. I am so confused right now.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:29 PM
1

What's wrong with abstaining from ad-hominem attacks to validate your arguments? Insulting your opponent, calling them "stupid" or "delusional" doesn't support your position, it can often put people off; especially feminists who don't engage in dialogue with people they perceive as rude. Nothing, but feminists don't follow logic, they follow emotion, if it "feels right" it is, it is then just a matter of reverse-engineering the argument through any manner of logical fallacies, hence your very ow…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:24 PM
1

3. - empirical Tender years Vawa Sentencing Disparity Child custody reform Family court Body integrity legislation Federally funded female research institutes vs. male ACA Dear Colleague Letter White House Council on Women and Girls White House Council on Men and Boys There are more, but these are off the top of my head. Empirically women are legislated for by a much larger margin than men.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:09 PM
1

Tone policing now? If your girl or you have issue with videos like Thunderfoots or GWW in their tone, you guys really need to start divorcing your personal identities from "the product" Feminism and start looking at what Feminism actually is objectively. It sounds like your girl thinks Feminism is the dictionary definition and not a product of the actions of its most powerful manipulators, legislators, and interests.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:01 PM
2

The unfortunate catch 22 is you can't blame the lack of female leaders in high political position on the lack of women voters. And further, you have to unfortunately respect your fellow woman's choice. [edit] Further, your argument presumes men cannot legislate women's interests, the opposite has been proven and is one of the main causes of the injustices that this very sub fights against.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:44 PM
1

I'm pretty sure women being the majority of voters in a representational democracy is the strongest argument you could make in refuting the case that they are under-represented. Your point that I misunderstood your Nr. 6 to tie into myths stands and I concede that. The way I read it was as you calling out a purposeful omission (the myth) that couldn't be refuted. I interpreted it as a passive aggressive challenge. I apologize, PA tends to be the tense that detractors to these subjects use.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:42 PM
4

This is untrue. Women are the majority of voters in the US by a larger margin than the difference in population ratios (where they are also the majority). This is true of most, and possibly all Western countries. (np fixed citation)
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:38 PM
11

It is the only way it would be published in time. If anyone else other than a female feminist wrote it, it would be ignored. Nothing written there is news to anyone who has been following Men's Rights for over a year, and all of the points have been debated and discussed for years.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:29 PM
11

She frustrates me so much. In the latest Jimquisition (if you want to get frustrated further) Jim actually attacks critics of Anita Sarkeesian (Framing them as sending rape and death threats) while admitting he has never watched her content and implying that Sarkeesian doesn't have any power in the gaming industry (Mirror's edge anyone?). I don't know what to do. Sarkeesian seems to be immune to the "game journalism" mainstream from calling her out on her bullshit because they are all industry s…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:22 PM
3

Relevant, unfortunately
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:56 PM
1

You got wooshed, a common feminist trope and claim in their propaganda is that only men can teach other men not to rape, this is an attempt to make one man raping the burden of all men so they are all responsible and therefore can all be viewed as rapists. -this is what feminists actually think.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:35 PM
3

I was going to say the exact same thing in reply to another. These are the MRM equivelant of those very same tactics. In 30-40 years people look back at these kinds of articles, comics and memes and will shake their head asking themselves "how could people not see there was an issue?". It can be frustrating in the short term, but in a long term such articles actually help catalog exactly what was going on and when.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:35 AM
1

Are you sure?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 12:42 AM
2

Reform the alimony system, but I wouldn't say that women are any more morally flawed than men. We understand that, the majority of society does not, hence these kinds of posts. Women are regularly viewed as morally superior to men and the myth is constantly perpetuated to the point that women "can do no wrong".
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:00 AM
2

To spring off of this, people also need to realize just how much mainstream media has slid. You have all the major news outlets taking their cues from twitter trends and facebook popularity for subjects and news stories. Investigative journalism is, for all intents and purposes, dead. "Feels before reals" is an actual thing now and as long as people's gut tells them it's "right" they don't question it. People's natural biases, without any checks, control the various trends among the major online…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:42 PM
1

Especially if you take into account the culture this is coming from.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:09 PM
4

Social Justice Warriors are going to flood the poll with false data. There is no point in participating in online polls as they can be gamed so easily.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 10:24 AM
59

Required post on that pile of BS. Apparently "False equivalence" is a newish "go to" phrase/fallacy to try and bully the other debater into not actually pressing the validity of the issue. Feminists; pointing out logical fallacies that are themselves logical fallacies in order to suppress logic since ~1960.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 04:36 AM
0

Lapidary?
/r/MensRights25/08/14 10:49 AM
0

Not mutually exclusive. You can have someone who was driven to kill through desperation via starvation who has never killed before. [Edit] Further, there are those who would be more willing to kill than others. Not everyone who has killed someone has felt regret or some sort of "I'll never do that again" introspection. Nearly everyone that has ever gone hungry has felt desperation.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:25 AM
5

Are they trying to the documentary by mimicking Anita's cost:work ratio?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:24 PM
10

Anyone who disagrees with your point of view has never gone hungry.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:03 AM
3

Yes. His 30 million a YEAR unending and recurring debt definitely contributed to the stress in his life. How this could even be debated is beyond me.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:45 AM
5

This is what happens, any dissent, even if it is the truth, that goes against the popular narrative by these people will be met with the above type of actions. This is the new generation growing up, going through these kinds of institutions, and they will be shaping the world in the coming decades. Imagine the kids being raised and born now, imagine the kind of indoctrination they will go through. "If you feel it, it must be true."
/r/MensRights24/08/14 01:27 AM
3

Feminism is more often than not just projection these days.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 01:01 AM
2

15 minute piece by VICE on the Dubai slave force.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 07:54 AM
3

It's best to start with things that are objectively irrefutable, it cuts down on lazy debaters from making any number of fallacies and garnering emotional support from the masses because "it sounds good".
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:21 AM
1

The degrees are practically free as is in some universities.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:11 AM
23

As an additional note, if he feels he needs to vent when writing (it helped me a lot in the past) just have him use a different journal. That in itself is hugely theraputic as for me, it allowed to get all the negative BS out of my head that was replaying itself over and over, down on paper. When I got to write it down, most of the time I felt I didn't need to re-live it. Also, as someone who has written in journals and drawn in sketchbooks all my life, quality/price of the journal doesn't reall…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:06 AM
104

I'm going to suggest to you (to pass on to him) what I suggest to everyone in your guy's situation. Now I am not a lawyer and this doesn't confront the legal side of things. Get him, with some spare cash, an inexpensive journal and a pen. Have him, whenever he is thinking of his daughter, write down his thoughts about her in as positive a way as possible. If he misses her, have him open a page, date it, and have him write down what he would want to tell her right then and there. Get him into the…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:46 AM
-2

And not all people get married so it's half of "those people who do" not "everyone" and not "all men". Want to try again?
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:21 AM
7

Be Handsome, Be Attractive, Don't Be Unattractive! (SNL Skit)
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:12 PM
23

how is this even anything to complain about? Did he break rules 1 through 3?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 01:40 PM
2

I went to that college and took that class and graded that class. I know what I'm talking about. How long ago?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:09 AM
2

This is probably just as important of a point on its own.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:05 AM
7

Probably the primary reason why there was trouble in the marriage.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:37 AM
3

Allegory of the cave guys, allegory of the cave! Godwin near miss. Every woman needs to learn to swallow. The world needs to learn to swallow. I drink male tears. (I bathe in male tears) Honey Badgers are a Battered Woman's Refuge. "You know that they say about guys with large hands?" -Miss Piggy Do indi devs drink Steam tears? Maybe 6, maybe more, maybe less. Self proclaimed retired "Professional Slut" lecturing [Redacted] on the morality of Vagina slime. To GWW (and the rest of the ladies) tak…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 01:35 AM
10

Contact a lawyer, he will then probably have you contact the police. The law however is not on your side, the kids are considered "hers" more than they are considered "yours" by a very large degree.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 12:51 AM
2

Men don't exist.. It's not a case of them being blind to what is going on, it's them being blind to those targeted by what is going on as human.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 12:49 AM
2

I'm loving the refinement of the badgers more and more. Keep it up. Will be listening live tonight.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:58 PM
8

I hope to see Karen up there one of these days. Would have loved to see ManWomanMyth or AngryHarry, or even Erin Pizzey, how about Helen Smith? Fuck, know what, I'd settle for C.H. Sommers. Not going to happen though. If you have been following TED, it's so entwined with Feminism... simply not going to happen.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:05 PM
-1

At which point you are just a typical virgin neckbeard that got frustrated and angry that you got friendzoned and took it out on the door. "Stop being nice just because you think it will get you laid. " - Feminism and/or TheRedPill -Whoa
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:50 PM
1

Who wooshes the wooshmen?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:45 PM
5

You don't understand, that was Schrodinger's possibility of Schrodinger's rape. What you really need to do is start with the premise that all men are either rapists or rapists just waiting for the opportunity. Once you take the above to be true, and you look at all these situations, it will make more sense. This is honestly how feminists think and worse... feel. It's also why everything is rape to them.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:44 PM
2

did you read Total Biscuits post? He went out of his way to drag the "MRA"s into the mix by throwing out some "Maybe, and I don't know, and I don't care" -It was such bullshit, You don't know or care... so why bring up the name anyway. One cursory glance at the front page of /r/mr at the time and anyone who was anyone would know we didn't give two shits about it. Now most of the "care" is associated with how bullshit it is that people are trying to blame us for it. It's frustrating to say the le…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:39 PM
31

Wow, that article is bullshit. When was the last time the word "could" was used in reference to being put on the sex offender's list and "Megan's Law" was rolled out in lieu of "sex offender list/registry"? And of course... "good thing she screwed up on the timestamps, huh?" -otherwise we all know that there would be no mention of "Megan's Law" or the uses of "could" as it pertained to her husband.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:34 PM
1

That is certainly a reading of it, but is it an accurate one? Mocking cancer victims? For humour? Is that likely? That are exclusively men? After a long list of supposed advantages?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:19 PM
22

It's just the usual feminist talking points rebranded and trying to gain credibility by embedding itself into "humor". I'd laugh if any of the facts of the matter were true behind the stereo types. Know how female stand up comics are rarely funny? It's the same as this.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:51 AM
2

It is bullshit, welcome to the western world. Here is a quick primer. The creator of that video has an entire series covering just about everything the MRM has an interest in, there are even multiple videos concerning Child support, child custody, paternity fraud, and family court biases.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:17 AM
2

I agree with the general sentiment of your message but you really do a great job at a back-handed support of the idea of Men's Rights. I'd also say you don't actually hang around this board too much if you think we have much to do with the Redpill crew. There is a little, (And I do mean very little) crossover but meh, not going to debate minutiae. Also, spermjackings in the sense of stealing some guy's condom are far more rare than 3-4 a year as far as we can tell. Reported in an article? Probab…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:12 AM
2

You can always ask and someone will answer. It's an easier and more efficient system than having every key name triggering a block of text with wikipedia or article links. Also, there is just an easy google search, doesn't take long and it catches you up to a context. Even if such a bot existed it probably even have Zoe Quinn in its database. As for prominent Feminists, consider it 101 study to learn key names and who they are like Solanas and Dworkin. It is important to learn context on your ow…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 08:31 AM
2

In the past something of an unofficial agreement came about that /r/mensrights wouldn't involve itself with XX, and XX would try hard to keep the crossposting and brigading to a minimum. This was long before SRS became big. In all honesty, just leave XX alone if you don't like most of what they post. Yes, it's an echochamber, yes, they manipulate and lie and sockpuppet and play the professional victim. Yes, they turn any thread about how bad an ex boyfriend treated so and so into a general softc…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:54 AM
2

Define quality content?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:40 AM
1

Semi Related - Satire, "Welcome to Tumbler". For some reason reading your above made me think of that short, maybe you will enjoy it. It makes fun of professional victims.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:39 AM
2

Oh, I know, I was around. [edit] I've been following the MRM since about 2001, mainly through Angry Harry back then. [2nd Edit] I remember very early internet round table debates between "MRA's" (the concept of an MRM or MRA was not formed anywhere near that time) and Feminists in the form of old school bulletin board forwarded emails. The earliest debated point I can remember was "if the paygap was real, then why don't all employers fire all the men, hire all the women, and pay them 85 cents on…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:13 AM
3

Sometimes to get out of paying cab fare for one. And that's just the first one I found, I've seen quite a few.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:53 AM
1

Meh, I like who I was born as, it sucks that I see the various inequalities in things like law, social policies, and the bias I see in such things as courts sentencing, conviction rates, or child custody. I also see all the benefits women in today's society get. If I were a woman, just by virtue of my gender, I'd be much much further along in my career pursuits than I currently am. Recruiters would be falling head over heels trying to hire me and I'd probably be making about 150k right now. (wom…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:25 AM
7

The MRM. Mens Rights Movement. An MRA is a Men's Rights Advocate. It's not generally referred to as the Men's Rights Adovcacy. "a while" is subjective to say the least. We don't focus on one gender. We are currently focusing on the disproportionately disadvantaged gender. I am telling you right now if the scales were flipped, I would be on the other side with the same exact attitude... as a matter of fact, I was. I was already a feminist and when objectively looking at the evidence and getting m…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:05 AM
8

How do you ironicly pull a fire alarm? Is it in the face you make as you pull it?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:40 AM
6

So another Hugo.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:39 AM
6

consenting adults." Most cases of incest (I'd love to see an actual number, sorry I don't have one) don't involve consenting adults. And I am pretty sure that the ones that do are not illegal on the federal level. I am also sure such legislation would not trump something like a statute of limitations. It was well worded and was not phrased that way for the support of incest. The argument you are trying to play off of is no different than gay marriage laws leading to legal bestiality. [edit] The …
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:31 AM
2

So you expect the husband to prove the mental motivations of the wife in a court of law? Cute
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:28 AM
13

That's because for years the MRM has had to. There is no other way to "win a point" and even when we have facts studies and evidence, it's still weighted as an opinion to the counter point by feminists. An "opinion" from an MRA is instantly shot down as being self serving and biased even by those who aren't feminists and just listen to their rehetoric. "Because I don't hate women DEFINITELY NOT, I don't want to be labeled a mysoginist for disagreeing, yeah, give me that dry erase board. 'I need …
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:11 AM
-2

No, all SJW's are feminist and all feminsts live off of the SJW juice. SJW's are simply a less academic brand of feminism, it's taking "feels", which feminism was already doing, and mixes it with the "me me me" of the narcissistic facbook generation. SJW's are essentially arm chair feminists who think emotion is the penultimate justification for anything.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:47 AM
2

I'm buying you a beer one day.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:40 AM
7

Agent Orange, it was a big deal and a lot of controversy surrounded it. He "doxxed"1 three radical feminists who were public officials in positions of power that held beliefs as extreme as eugenics and lower the % male population. The contention with whether he doxxed them or not is that he simply revealed their full names that were public record and tied them to what they wrote "behind closed doors" on a feminist Extremist board. Reddit viewed that as doxxing, outside websites did not, this is …
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:33 AM
1

I agree it's an MR issue but the board has always been a target. SJW's are just feminists by another name.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:11 AM
2

It's already done a lot to show that SJW's are over-sensitive hypocrites with nothing but selfish motives in-spite of the people they claim to help. Sound familiar? SJW's are just Feminists by another name in all honesty, the feminism label has been getting a bad reputation so they "migrated" it's literally the same shit.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:09 AM
-1

Agree
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:38 AM
5

It's good. The backlash is also amazingly sweet as it finally does "us" the favor of calling out SJW (by another name would be doubly foul) on their propagated shit, this one is just connected to gaming. I lost respect for TotalBiscuit though, he went out of his way to drag the MRM into it when, from what I can see from all angles, "we've" been avoiding this like the damn plague. He's an asshole for it, but he is just playing to the crowd, (not defending him). But the loudest voices on the issue…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 06:33 AM
1

They don't care unless it can get them re-elected, and in this case they wouldn't care.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:31 AM
2

Should have held her in contempt of court and sent her to jail for a night. If she challenges it and I were the judge, I'd tell her "Either you disobeyed the court or you are lying, are you lying under oath?" Because she either didn't write an apology or she is lying that it is an apology.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:28 AM
12

It's not an excuse, it's the reality of the situation. Reddit admins have historically held /r/mensrights to far higher standards than other subreddits. If it were allowed here they would use it as an excuse to ban the subreddit outright.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:02 AM
18

The rules the Reddit admins hold the /r/mensrights subreddit to are a completely different set than Reddit admins hold the rest of reddit to, which is again a completely different set compared to the set they hold places like SRS to. This is the unwritten reality of the situation and there is nothing we can do about it currently except by playing "within" the biased enforcement of various sets of written and unwritten rules.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:16 AM
12

Comments that will come from feminism: "The (prejudicial) writing and enforcement of these laws is working! We need more!" "No, the rapes are just going unreported to a much greater degree now, we need more laws to compensate!" Also, if we are going by the standard definitions of rape, men are largely not counted in those statistics, unless they are accounting for prison. I doubt they are accounting for prison, but if they were, I'd bet we found a where we could make the best headway next to get…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:49 AM
5

I agree with this absolutely. Allow the person who might be ashamed the security of hiding behind the ambiguity and repetitive nature of the process. Like how I think every medical professional everywhere asks you if you have any STDs. Anyone who has been to the doctor more than once realizes they ask everyone this along with a few other "what?" questions. You could go so far and look down at a clipboard even if the question isn't there. This lets whoever might be abused the illusion that eyes a…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:45 AM
0

I disagree, 1. It is a zero sum game 2. The general understanding from both sides knows it's a zero sum game 3. Feminism likes to pretend it isn't while acting on that it is. Simple example - In Child custody cases, if/when men gain equal footing, women will lose both time with the kids and child support funding. Another example - In the case of all the time and resources ($) that goes to supporting girls K-College and the thousands of various programs trying to get more girls into STEM fields, …
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:06 AM
5

Especially since it tries to both make forgiveness an inherently female thing while robbing men who have compassion of that credit and even turns it around to be "A (justified?) reason why" a woman would leave them. It's a 3 for one. Implies women are naturally forgiving. Implies that when a man forgives, it's a feminine thing to do that he learned from the woman. Implies because he understands and can act on forgiveness, it gives the woman a justification for leaving. There is nothing positive …
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:53 AM
1

Tough spot to be in. While I am sure there are lawyers that hang around these forums, I've never seen any pro-bono work offered through here on a case such as yours. Some areas of Men's Rights take up special case situations, like a corrupt judge, or where it can be proved that evidence is being suppressed... but at this time the Men's Rights Movement really can't help most cases. Yours is common and you admit that you did something wrong (whether you did or didn't, you should not post about it …
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:35 AM
1

You've never won a debate by agreeing with the point you are trying to discredit, then driving their original defender to discredit their own point? You should try it sometime, it's absolutely the best. This would be the same sort of thing. Since she is so precious and infallable, and so prone to danger... quick, help her obvious (out of her own control) psychological issues "until she gets better". Capone went to jail for tax evasion because they couldn't get them on anything else, they didn't …
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:29 AM
3

And society reinforces this belief over and over again.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:24 AM
17

Because there were 2-3 very popular and successful posts related to men's rights. And feminism, despite Reddit being a largely male used site, has its influence pretty much everywhere. So /r/bestof as well as IAMA went out of their way to make "special rules" that exclude a large subset of subreddits like men's rights, but was for the specific purpose of excluding MRA material as the rules were enacted the day of or the day after the last such successful submission (the submission was still on t…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 07:02 AM
0

How did you enjoy your time at the Men's Rights Conference?
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:56 AM
3

If they try to discredit they end up with death threats and having their pets killed.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:54 AM
1

Then you don't know how domestic violence calls to the police work.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 07:07 AM
1

feminism has; or, at least, their lies have become apparent. Bolded is a very important point. Feminism hasn't changed, they just never had any popular or visible detractors that couldn't just be laughed away before.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 06:09 AM
2

Here is an article written 14 years ago about it, and even then it wasn't anything new. Where in the last 25 years have you been? From everyone I've spoken to in teaching circles both at the college level as well as k-12, It's a known that boys are in trouble... but in most cases it's just 1000 convoluted excuses as to why and no one wants to think it is institutional because then that means "Boys are being discriminated against" which is in direct conflict with Feminist theory and its sweethear…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:37 AM
2

Women who make it past their first two years of college aren't exactly in the same mindset they will be about 7 years after that point. It' is not the specific woman and her viewpoint that matters, all that variation is transformed more to a central point the closer to ~30 any woman gets. A 21 year old woman exclaiming they never want kids is a totally different thing than a 30 year old woman claiming the same, even if it's the same person. The lamenting largely comes from the closer to 30 crowd…
/r/MensRights16/08/14 10:40 AM
6

What if the government required you to hire them though? (See where this is going already went?)
/r/MensRights16/08/14 10:32 AM
17

Such signs are put up not to be condescending to men but tend to be there to keep the busy-bodies at bay. Without the signs you get "those" kinds of people calling 911 or insisting and instigating in fights with dads/men who have the right to be there. While it is sad that the sings are needed (that they are needed at all should make any gender studies major hang their head in shame), it is better than it was ~10 years ago where the sings were not up and fathers were continuously harassed.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 06:21 AM
8

Skulls
/r/MensRights12/08/14 12:29 AM
4

Echo chambers all the way down.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:28 AM
1

Conscription, aka "The Draft".
/r/MensRights09/08/14 03:46 PM
2

"Male power fantasy" Game set and match for the entire debate in one image.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:58 PM
1

http://edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:48 AM
2

Coming from someone who went through it for ~7 years, you are exactly right and there is absolutely NO NEED to apologize, that's them blaming you for something that isn't your fault and you believing it because maybe, just maybe if you fix the problem "it will get better". The sleight of hand is that the things that aren't "good" are irrational apparitions for no rhyme or reason. When you start to apply logic and reason to an irrational environment trying to fix that environment you start to go …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:40 PM
11

Consad Report. All you ever need to write down to counter any pay gap myth. Consad report had it right in 2009 and economists in the know had it right in the 70's and the 80's. The only thing that has changed in all this time are the questions being asked and the kind of questions being "allowed" to be asked.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:36 PM
2

You should look into the Cluster B personality disorders. I'd wager your mother had one of them. One of my Ex's had Borderline Personality Disorder and many of the things that you write have me raising my eyebrows. DSM V - Borderline Personality Disorder changes for diagnosis. It's a quick synopsis, if reading it sounds familiar, chances are she was BPR or one of the closely related cluster B's. BPD's only really reveal their true colors to the people they are closest to, loved ones, offspring, …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:32 PM
6

This is a very key point. Generally, when someone hits first, they made a conscious choice, they had to choose to initiate. Being hit, it is NATURAL to hit whatever hit you back, Especially when you were not expecting it. Women who hit men first have far more agency in the situation than men do when reacting to it, no matter their reaction. Let me rephrase that. HUMANS who hit other humans first have far more agency in the situation than the other has when they react to it, no matter their react…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:09 PM
35

I wish I could find a video where she was giving a privateish interview and they ask her what the most offensive word is to her. She gives a brilliant off the cuff presentation on how "stupid" is the most offensive word to her. I saw the video once years ago and have since been searching for it. It is absolutely brilliant. "They" try and goad her into preaching about how "nigger" or other racial slurs are offensive. When I saw the presentation, the years that followed where she takes these unpop…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:56 PM
1

Yup
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:29 AM
6

It's because women in general are raised and conditioned to drink the SJW juice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9YL04v-J5U Imagine a woman delivering this, it wouldn't happen because of SJW feels. Also Burr has Conan tearing here.... you are a true comedian when you can get other comedians laughing that hard... ON THE FLY. Watch his face reaction when he realizes the midgets, I highly doubt he had the material pre-written.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:16 AM
4

She's an accidental con-artist who has no concept of what a dollar is worth. She over-valued the idea of making a youtube series and got the math allllll wrong, but everyone cheered her on from the SJW side and threw money at her. You make the videos first, sometimes for years, before you get recognized and then you make money of the advertizements if you are lucky. Even then you still need to make videos and it become a JOB. (most successful you-tubers work hard, so do streamers.) She instead i…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:14 AM
5

The reason why men seem to succeed at impossibly long odds difficult tasks where women do not is that, largely, they are doing so without a net. That is a huge difference. Men don't have nets like western society gives to a lot of women just for their gender. I'm in the early parts of a career that I have no idea if it will work or even be livable. I don't have some trust fund behind me or options to "marry up" if things don't work out. I have found a lot of women simply don't understand what it…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:02 AM
2

Bill Burr ALWAYS nails it because he has no filter. And I have to plug his most hilarious B-sides out there... Sherries Berries, if you need an F-ing cheer up, you need to listen to him deliver this advertisement. -Delivered on his Monday morning podcast- must listen. (he is reading off the copy for the first time)
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:45 AM
2

On jury selection they are VERY VERY VERY VERY strict and thorough about there being no ties of the defendant or any witnesses/main participants in the case to the judge, court room, or the individual jurors. Seriously "WTF". It's just a BS excuse to protect a privileged class, it's pure unadulterated corruption.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:38 AM
1

Idealistic notion but being polite has gotten the movement nowhere, being rational on the other hand has. There is a difference. Many like to equate being angry or impolite with being irrational. If the main players in the MRM remained polite and sought to not disturb anyone's feelings we'd be no where near where we are today. Anyone who claims otherwise just showed up last week and is seeking to white-wash the movement. The good men project is that way --->
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:32 PM
5

She sounds dishonest and unstable. I'd involve your parents in this ASAP and perhaps a lawyer.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:47 AM
-1

Companies won't give you the time of day if there isn't the threat of the media spotlight. It is not in their financial best interest to otherwise. Companies, money, media. Not complicated.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 08:43 AM
-23

Polite doesn't get the media spotlight.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 08:30 AM
7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3h6es6zh1c
/r/MensRights20/07/14 05:25 AM
3

Women in general have a really difficult time empathizing with the concept of cuckoldry since it's a practical impossibility for them to have another woman's baby by accident. There isn't any biological conditioning to "doubt" their own pregnancy, but if there were they would go ape-shit of the issue. The closest parallel is taking the wrong baby home from the hospital after it is given birth to and separated from the mother/father (and accidentally switched). That's such a big issue and it happ…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:17 AM
3

I'm all for your source above but the 30% rate is actually high, it's of those tested with a weighted pre-selected bias of those seeking a paternity test. I've been following paternity fraud for over a decade and the 30% number is mostly represented in a false light whenever it comes up. It is "of those tested". IIRC a closer number was 1 in 20. The numbers also are distinct depending on what social class you are referring to. White middle-uppper families have a lower paternity fraud rate while …
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:22 PM
3

There is another very similar one from about a year ago, texas I believe. I'll try and find it. http://abcnews.go.com/US/charges-texas-father-beat-death-daughters-molester/story?id=16612071 The perpetrator in this story wasn't so lucky.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:01 AM
14

the harm? College enrollment on some campuses is 60% women and 40% men. On the same campuses enrollment into STEM fields is still predominantly male. What happens? Funding gets diverted into getting more women interested in the STEM fields on said campus ignoring the already 60/40 imbalance. It isn't a case of lack of opportunity, it is a case of a lack of individual interest. What's that old saying about leading a four legged animal to water? That's the harm.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:31 AM
1

I said nothing about "no risk", you tried to put those words in my mouth and you side-stepped the issue of having to be tech savvy.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:02 PM
2

I think Bitcoin is an option for a lot of people for many reasons but has a a lot of risk associated with it both as an unbacked and unregulated currency as well as being for the technologically affluent. Gold is a much better and more stable option both in simplicity and ubiquitous value.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:06 PM
2

That you can't either figure that our or imagine why it would be an issue is a perfect illustration as to why you should not be giving financial advice.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:41 PM
1

You think Bitcoin is a smart risk for a 60 year old?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 04:13 PM
1

They ask that cop question of all jurors across all states.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:31 PM
1

Because this is a relatively new industry and I am sure there is a false veil of invincibility because of their socioeconomic standing. "It only happens to poor people, I am not poor, therefore it will not happen to me. I imagine there is something of a surreal environment the first time a woman ventures into these kinds of situations. Because it doesn't seem real, because it's dreamlike, and combine it with the impulsive nature of the modern age; long-term consequences are such a far off though…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:39 PM
2

Simplest argument I can come up with is that it removes a choice from an individual before they can form thoughts and makes choices. Further, it is a procedure and a decision that can realistically be made at any time in the future so why is it necessary to have that "choice" forced upon someone instead of including them in it? Would it then all of a sudden become unpopular? What does that then say about the procedure that the only ones that would submit to it are those literally without the cap…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:46 PM
7

Feminists claim women suffer from everything more whether it is true or not. If something can be categorized as suffering, it is women who suffer from it more according to feminists. Most glaring example is also a well known one on these boards; Hillary Clinton "primary victims quote"
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:28 PM
-1

Once her specific issue is resolved she will fall back into the fold. She doesn't care about men, she only cares about her progeny who happens to be male. [edit] "Far from a mere expulsion, those wrongfully accused yet caught in up in the campus tribunal process face life-altering devastation that places their education, careers and emotional stability in great jeopardy." This argument has been stated hundreds if not thousands of times from within MRM circles and the constant and uniform feminis…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 09:13 PM
9

What law was he breaking?
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:04 PM
1

Whatever has happened to her, she used to be much more against institutional feminism than she is today. I first learned of her from angry harry in 2002 or 2003 and then watched her at the first men's studies symposium (2009) when I watched her give a presentation on the lack of research institutes looking at men. I picked up her war against boys book (previous printing) and it was so damning and scathing I was amazed that she still called herself a feminist, I figured it was in name only becaus…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 05:10 AM
1

It's because she is trying desperately to save the institution of feminism.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:59 AM
1

I'm only 30 minutes in and I am loving the show so far.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:09 PM
1

I actually watch Jim sterling and am up to date with him. But here is the thing, Jim sterling probably wouldn't claim that it is MRA's that made the threats, in-spite of his SJW base. My anger at TB is making an unfounded case out of thin air, an un informed unfounded case. Jim sterling, despite his ideological position, will admit when he is wrong and rarely if ever claims something without something to back it up (not defending him, often enough that backup is just 2nd level click bait.). TB j…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:34 PM
1

I've seen you let 2 people know about 2 shadowbans in the past 24 hours. What's up? Are we getting an influx of trolls or is some other subreddit or it's users targeting forum commentators here through other means or something else? I didn't think shadow-bans were that common.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 04:50 PM
2

Total Biscuit is completely out of his depth in trying to link MRAs, extremist or otherwise to what ... "someone on twitter said about a white guy getting a position at a video-game publication." Read that back again. Look at our sidebar, read through all our FAQ's. In short... we have far bigger issues to deal with here than an opinion on twitter and TB can go fuck himself for pulling shit out of his ass. [Edit] I forgot, one of the key points brought up during the Detroit conference was the op…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 04:30 PM
1

What do you think the odds are that those sending the hateful tweets have so much even looked at /r/mensrights or read an AVFM article, or watched any of the various youtube MRA personalities? The rape threats didn't come from anywhere within the MRA sphere. Who said what about a white guy getting a job at a vidogame publication is SO far outside the scope of what goes on here, avfm, lesser known blogs, etc. etc. that it's absolutely absurd to try and link the two. I had respect for TB, but if h…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 04:28 PM
2

Congratulations man. That's really awesome.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 01:32 AM
1

When I read that I didn't interpret it as "need from them" as in selfishness, but instead interpreted it as "shape your needs so you feel fulfilled by what men just naturally are". I of course could be wrong.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 01:30 AM
5

It was sarcasm, I do apologize for not laying it on thick enough.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:41 AM
11

I wish /r/mensrights[1] would go back to being about men's rights and moaning about feminists. I'm guessing you mean being critical of feminism? You were never here when men's rights did not involve challenging Feminism as it has always challenged Feminism since Feminism is the main force behind the political and social influences that block many Men's Rights issues from moving forward. Quick example: Family court equality.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:21 PM
-5

Why do you hate women?
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:19 PM
7

This is the trailer - Hitman Absolution
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:11 PM
2

It's a frustrating comments section to read. Generally the commentators are running around in logical circles refusing to acknowledge that men and women are different, interests, how they see the world, competitiveness and yes, even intellect. A good refresher for the boos from the gallery; http://edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html There is a ton of research of the mental differences in genders but SJW's love to suppress it and never even acknowledge it. -or build a house of cards…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 03:33 PM
5

TIL Festooning - contextually I understood it, but I like knowing the exact meaning and in this case it adds more imagery.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 03:07 PM
1

Go ahead and post a naked picture of yourself with rg57 verification (written on a piece of paper or something).
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:19 PM
1

Yeah, when I read your reply I felt I should actually write what it was instead of leave a mystery link.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:14 PM
1

It's Karen straughan's Presentation in Detroit. (just so you can click or not click as your choice).
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:45 PM
5

You aren't anti-feminist? Have you seen this?
/r/MensRights02/07/14 12:39 PM
5

I don't really think any professor would be sympathetic to that kind of behavior. But he dose from that statement.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:21 AM
0

Aye... do you have a point here? Your statement was empty as you could take any feminist issue and replace your opening with it and it would still be "valid" as "Pro-feminism" is such a narrow concept as for policy awareness that I think it would only come up if someone were protesting a feminist budgeting meeting or something.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:44 PM
1

Domestic violence isn't pro-MRA it just happens to be one of the causes the MRM tries to push. Most of the men being physically, emotionally, and financially abused aren't actually MRAs. Education equality isn't pro-MRA it just happens to be one of the causes the MRM tries to push. Most of the men being discriminated against institutionally in education aren't actually MRAs. Parental rights equality isn't pro-MRA it just happens to be one of the causes the MRM tries to push. Most of the men bein…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 12:22 PM
1

No, it means most MRA's understand that without tangible proof the general public will take feminism's word over studies, numbers and facts. One of the things that is eroding the general public's blind trust in Feminism is in observing how they treat MRA's when "no one is watching".
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:39 AM
0

I'm sorry, I read your reply thrice and I could not discern either a refutation or a point, only a vague statement that makes no sense contextually.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:21 AM
0

Negative, pointing out the bad behavior of feminists at MRA events isn't to call for speech protections, just the opposite, most MRA's welcome Feminists acting the way they act without any masks on. It helps to illustrate to the rest of the world what feminism really stands for.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 01:12 AM
3

You still think feminism is about for equality for everyone? That's where your confusion stems from.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:51 AM
2

Because: Feminists.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:50 AM
5

If you have been watching long enough you would realize that AVFM was actually the moderate voice no more than 5 years ago. More extreme voices went underground or just fell off from the public sphere of attention. It's funny that you are characterizing AVFM as some sort of burden on the MRM. Without the "tone" of AVFM all these years the MRM would not be anywhere near where it is today, there would be no CAFE interest, the MRM would still be being made fun of instead of being fought against, we…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 09:23 PM
3

I'm surprised the comment wasn't hyperlinked to 101 spam.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 08:56 PM
7

Hell, TheGoodMenProject is an example of Feminism trying to infect Men's Rights Activism.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 08:54 PM
3

Beauty is subjective and genetics. Also men have far fewer aspects of "depending on looks" to officially freeload "When they have nothing else to contribute". That isn't an inequality. Affirmative action on the behalf of women was a direct result of feminism. Presuming a "benefited by affirmative action" demographic would be statistically inferior in skill to a demographic that would have to compete against affirmative action isn't inequality, or bigotry, it's actually arithmetic and logic. As f…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:52 PM
6

I'll tell you to do what I tell every father in your situation. Whatever you do, get a journal and a nice writing instrument. Whenever you think of your son, whenever something reminds you of him, whatever it is, date a page and write to him about it. Get it down on paper as you see/feel it. You might win some time, half time, whatever, but if that's not the case write to him whenever you can. One day in the future his mother will not be able to prevent you from giving him the journal(s) and no …
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:23 PM
1

It would be more balanced if she had a brother who just wanted to dress up nice, play with dolls and bake cookies, but it would also be a messy, distracted story by trying to pack that in. I strongly disagree as that would be a forced LGBT subtext and not an actual character for the period. A brother disinterested in the traditional "boy" activities at the time would be enough, but bake cookies? really?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:17 PM
7

Actually, it was the mother who was controlling, the father was sympathetic to his daughter's tom-boyishness.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:11 PM
4

Please, tell me what inequality women as a whole suffer in the western world.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:03 PM
0

Bringing the case might also bring to public light that there is no connection to rogers. And where the woozle came from.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 11:31 AM
-23

Yes, but in this case, what she did wasn't considered a sexual offense.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:00 PM
33

No, and child support is "to the benefit of the child". Basically it won't be the mother the child support goes to, but to the child, the mother is just the "custodian". Only way it works out that he wouldn't be on the hook is if the 11 year old boy or his parents get custody or the child goes up for adoption. The boy also has no say in that either since "it's the woman's choice".
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:41 PM
1

Karen DeCrow was an example of the kind of feminism which the Radfems and Third Wavers ran out of the movement and ruthlessly persecute. Out of one side of their mouth, while out of the other they point to such examples to buttress the concept of "mens issues would be solved with more feminism."
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:39 PM
144

Watch, soon he will be on the hook for child support. [Edit] I really really really wish I was joking.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:20 PM
2

When I was 8 or 9 two teenage girls who were watching me (sisters) found condoms in my parents room, they gave me one and kept trying to get me to go put it on "they just wanted to see". I relented long enough that they dropped it and I was not at all scarred from it in any way, but I've "seen" the "explore sexuality by proxy" trope more than once growing up.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:19 PM
4

I'm "glad" for the case, but he didn't train for the test. If you have a physical test and the cutoff is 40 push ups you train to be able to do 50 any day of the week. If he can't hit the 50 number and is wasting time, it's on him.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:24 PM
1

Subconsciously she is livid that they are not, and that's what's really got her upset.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:27 AM
1

To claim a men's rights organization is ... EXPLOITING combat veterans is blindingly rage inducing. The fucking gall on anyone who would dare.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:20 AM
2

Disadvantage implies someone else has an advantage. Disadvantage to women logically implies "when compared to men" as there are no "others" unless you mean to suggest OP meant Men and transgendered people. To which all the answers are still "no" -at least not in the US.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:17 AM
11

That's not an advantage over men legally though, concerning Roe. I'm pro choice and am nodding along with the spirit of your example, but any avenue to terminate a pregnancy legally, no matter how convoluted and purposely bureaucratic... it's still "Above" the principle rights of men in this area, as men have none.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:15 AM
1

They don't opposed it, and definitely not actively. Atheism+ is to Atheism as the Teaparty is to the Republican party. Everyone is scared to say anything for fear of drawing the ire of the crazy.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:15 AM
6

What opponents to the MRM need to learn, but have failed to learn, is that the MRM never bluffs with its statements... why? It's impossible for it to as every single statement, no matter how obvious, for over the last 15 years at least is immediately confronted with "source?" "do you have a source on that?" "What's your source?". It is so common for opponents to try and discredit a claim by asking for a source that it is second nature for MRA's to have scores of links and citations in their back…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 02:05 AM
14

ManhoodAca has been spamming this subreddit for over 3 years. They were warned years ago to not spam their website (Advertize). They usually embed it into misogynistic rhetoric without actually caring about the conversation. They used to have pages and pages of angry copypasta that almost sounded like they were participating (albeit in a caustic manner) but in reality they don't care about either side of the men's rights issue. They just want to entice angry young men into going to their "self h…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:02 PM
3

I learned it in middle school.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:36 PM
3

It also makes me wonder... are there groups of, yes, genuine misogynists with no real awareness of the MRM adopting an MRA label and acting equally douchetastic? Yes, A lot of them left this subreddit about a year or two ago when the community in general kept down-voting their stuff. There is also a particular website that constantly spams its snakeoil here. It is one of the few (only one?) organizations/websites that have earned a perma-ban on the /r/mensrights subreddit. The board was a far mo…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:12 PM
-3

They're so quick to scream "NAFALT!" They're also very quick to mock people who say "not all men are like that". The F in NAFALT is Feminist.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:54 AM
2

Not poor guy, everyone told him exactly what would happen. Stubborn guy more like it. I have no empathy for him, despite his good intentions.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:22 AM
-7

Feminist =/= woman, that's your primary mistake.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:20 AM
3

You didn't watch the video.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:27 PM
1

Unsure, I'm in the states.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:25 PM
4

You didn't watch the video.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:37 PM
12

You pay attention to youtube comments?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:53 AM
3

Did you watch the video? -My first link?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:19 AM
6

A few clarifications. She might have slept with 324 different men after she was infected, but not all 324 would have been infected from those acts. The Blurb, and yes, it's a blurb, does not clarify how she infected them, but it is implied it is through intercourse. The authors found that, overall, female-to-male (.04% per act or, in theory, about 4 cases of HIV transmission per every 10,000 acts of vaginal sex with a woman who is HIV positive) and male-to-female (.08% per act or 8 cases of HIV …
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:46 AM
7

Study the last 40 years of what feminism has done, why and how they accomplished it, and who "Suffered". Then pay attention to the next 10/15 years while holding in your head the idea that Feminism is just misunderstood or is going through a phase. I was once a feminist, about 15 years ago now, I did what I am suggesting you do now. In the end I learned a great many things, but the most important thing I learned was that there is nothing anyone in this thread can tell you. Either you are an obje…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 03:58 AM
3

You would enjoy the book how the mind works by Steven Pinker.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:57 PM
4

"so if a guy" Yes, in this day and age, if you are a guy you are indeed presumed to be a sex offender. Where have you been?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:07 AM
1

Anti SRS and TheRedPill (And one Y) were all created when the uncouth elements from each were not allowed to peddle their shit on /r/MR. Anti-SRS for its brigading nature (very much like SRS). TheRedPill for their Pickup cultural myopia. And one Y because they initially drank the feminist joy juice way too hardcore and it would just get downvoted here. They exist because they found /r/MensRights incompatible with their respective dogmas, even though more than a few users crossover. /r/MensRights…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:52 PM
3

I'm liberal leaning and generally vote the bitter pill D, I absolutely 100% agree.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 09:16 PM
1

And if you read what I wrote I said it's the case of fathers who suspect a case of an issue of paternity that 30% comes from. The 30% figure is so unscientific that it does not belong on the graph. It's a shock number, not an honest representation of what the collection of stats should be.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:20 AM
1

because the "gap" in pay isn't without its benefits. The "gap" in the wage gap affords the person with that gap more free time to pursue their own interests, the security of a more secure and stable and safe job. It's also a case of having to work less in school by taking easier degrees. The "gap" is not tied to just child rearing. Also having a child is far more to a woman's "want" than a man's these days, as they have every legal and even socially acceptable right to do whatever they want with…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 07:50 PM
-2

That 30% not the father figure is very dishonest and should be removed. It's "Of those who SUSPECT to not being the father, after testing, it's about 30%" The actual number is not yet known, I do believe the more widely accepted number is far too low (it's like 5%) but I know the criteria by which they got the 30% figure and as it is represented in the graph it is false. It also tarnishes the rest of the data by association. Man woman myth video on it. Part II
/r/MensRights21/04/14 04:39 PM
3

Hugo, is that you?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:42 PM
3

But do you feel we need a law dictating this part of interpersonal lives?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:03 PM
12

Women are human beings, Men are human doings. -ManWomanMyth
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:50 PM
3

What matters is the quality of their ideas, not their race/gender/political affiliation. Before the brigading, our poll showed that most MRAs on reddit are white male independents or conservatives. Just because there was a point where it was painfully obvious that the poll was brigaded does not mean it was not being casually skewed/brigaded before then before a concerted effort was made. The active population of "Regulars" on /r/Men'sRights is relatively small, when you generally get is a lot of…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:49 PM
1

Time: MarbleCakeAlso
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:26 PM
14

And the US Gov said they weren't spying on citizens. Do you really believe everything authority figures tell you?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:25 PM
2

My starting positions towards feminists is to dislike them. This isn't something I chose at the outset. When I was younger I was a feminist, up until I got into a debate with an "MRA" (they didn't have a name back then) who refuted every one of my talking points with verifiable and source-able studies/evidence or sound logic. Then I moved on to giving all other feminists the benefit of the doubt. Over the years feminists themselves, especially the heavily indoctrinated ones have taught me giving…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 09:41 AM
5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwogDPh-Sow Easy consumption is not the issue. False emotional rationalizations is.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:43 PM
0

The 77% logic is not at all logical and that's why it was crushed at a white house press conference with a few simple questions. The better question is how do we get irrational emotional thinking out of politics? Ahh.... not so easy.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:41 PM
2

Another problem is that you are incentivizing programming at an age where their own interests and drives should guide them. All this will result in is a bunch of students completing the course but a large portion "losing interest" once the environmental pressure/support is gone. "higher interest" with a resultant higher "drop out" (of interest) rate when someone is no longer there to hold their hand. This also hurts boys indirectly by co-opting the time they would normally have gotten from a giv…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:31 PM
1

Loy Finly calls the Wrongarians.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:31 PM
8

Hey, look, it's a wall street journal article saying what we have strongly suspected for over a decade and have know for a fact for half a decade.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:18 AM
5

Further, the whole fedora thing I am pretty damn sure was a memed character trait assigned to "neckbeards" by the SJWs. I think it was a case of projection when fedoras became a little popular a few years back (not mainstream, not by a long shot), and those who could sport them, did so handsomely/enjoyed themselves. Now take something largely males enjoy, something of a masculine identity, and attempt to destroy it by attributing it to a negative connotation. I regularly wear suits and I shave m…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:27 AM
3

Honestly? I'd start by focusing on the purely positive things that need help on. Like any charities and drives that help men where/when they need it the most. It can be something minor like.... At the end of your prank skit production, maybe once a month or as a one-off video each month, describe how [x] issue has effected you personally and you are just taking the time to bring some awareness to the issue. Find out about the men and boys in your family and social circles. "My cousin joe was rec…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 11:16 AM
2

By condoning, nurturing and even instituting various mechanisms that promote the higher-skilled training exclusively for women, often at teh detriment for men. War on Boys, read it. There is a net negative drag on men in general in western societies keeping them out or kicking them out of higher educational pursuits. So those "low skilled workers" are sometimes there because the cost of pursuing higher skills doesn't seem worth it anymore. Dear colleague letter, the abuse beyond it's intended us…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:14 AM
-1

This type of humor has been around for a while and I've always interpreted it as a tongue-in-cheek nod toward the traditional marriage dynamic that the wife always gets what she wants otherwise no sex and enjoy sleeping on the couch. I've seen similar "rules" signage with my parents but they truly treat each other as equals (without having to "try" nor having to be told to). -in their household it is a flat out parody/pointing to one of those "globally understood social expectations." The intere…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:59 AM
19

Tell a lie often enough.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:12 AM
5

Objectively speaking, VAWA and the duluth model on which it is based says you are actually wrong.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:09 AM
3

Of all the cops that I have known and dealt with, more than half were of the pig variety.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:04 AM
10

Men don't empathize with other men as much as women empathize with other women. The ad is meant to have men point and laugh at their sexual competition and do better than he did.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 10:46 PM
1

And before her Man Woman Myth in episode 31 of his video series 31:Equality - Suffrage and the UK voting rights
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:05 AM
23

Re-read that again. There wasn't a decent split between those two extremes. There was a decent split between those who though the guy was terrible but the application/interpretation of the law was just and the guy was terrible and the application/interpretation of the law was off base. It was also one of the rare times a judge stepped back and looked at the situation objectively weighing all aspects of what happened. Then there was a very small minority who thought there was nothing wrong with w…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 05:05 PM
17

Police however began to be suspicious after the Florida Highway Patrol reviewed turnpike video and couldn’t find images of Westover’s vehicle anywhere on the recordings. It's not because she lied, it's not because women are treated with the same incredulity as men. It is not because law enforcement or the general public can connect the dots on how claiming "rape!" as a means to an end... no... ... it's only because provable factual reality conflicted with a total fabrication.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 11:50 PM
1

Maybe a contributing factor to women's self esteem issues it that society and especially Feminism seeks to reduce women to infallible beings of good irrespective of their triumphs or failures. Not saying any of these studies or issues are legitimate, but playing to their findings, if nothing I did in life mattered on how I was percieved I can see that effecting my self esteem - a concept of how I percieve my self. When who you are is outside of your control that can be an issue. Now, if we were …
/r/MensRights16/03/14 08:45 AM
10

It's interesting as I used to watch Married with Children all the time. I didn't become an MRA until long after I stopped watching, when the reference to suicide in the above link came up a chill shot straight through my spine realizing instantly how prevalent it was in the show.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:55 PM
-2

Did you comprehend it then?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:43 PM
-2

I personally would have AVfM change the name, but that's up to them. Points to you for not reading my entire post.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:01 PM
2

This was discussed in either science or technology the other day. It was pointed out that the accomplishment was that of available resources to the boy, not necessarily his intellect (which was a contributing factor). I'm all for championing great accomplishments but this was a case of taking his parent's money and throwing it at a science fair.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:53 PM
7

AVfM used the "Red pill" analogy long before PUA's co-opted "the red pill" to mean something else. AVfM used it to mean someone who suddenly woke up and saw feminism for what it was as opposed to what Feminism told people it was. I'd say about a year to two years after that PUA's moved in on the term. Made a subreddit called the red pill "to compete" with /r/Mensrights because they weren't allowed to peddle their bullshit here. And so, the name and culture followed that instead of its AVfM usage…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:47 PM
1

Thank you for your response, though. I don't know what "vote brigading" means. It's where an outside group of readers are linked to a specific thread who's views are not the norm for that subreddit and this is revealed in the voting trends within that thread (but not on the board as a whole). Any posts challenging why the discussion of women's issues on this board is needed are being uncharacteristically downvoted while any "women's issues" even though they are not really appropriate for the boa…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:43 PM
-1

It's not really the place for you to whine and complain either. Report the thread to a moderator if you don't think it belongs here. We have had a good discussion and unless you're a moderator you shouldn't try and moderate the subreddit. You don't know how this forum works if you think that's how moderation on this subreddit works. Further, that means you ventured here from somewhere else with preconceived notions and a chip on your shoulder with something to prove. Watching the vote count sugg…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:43 AM
-2

And that is why I read all the responses, agreed with them and up-voted them (and didn't downvote OP). But this isn't the place for discussion of women's issues. There are more than enough places on reddit and the internet for that and very few places for men to discuss men's issues. The main reason why there is an /r/mensRights board and it is as popular as it is, is because "We" (MRA's) don't have many other places to go because of various underhanded tactics to shut down discussion or censor …
/r/MensRights11/03/14 11:01 PM
14

Anita is quite the snake-oil salesman that is riding on the coat-tails of feminist indignation and the burgeoning public spotlight on the gaming industry. She is a fraud and an opportunist that gets away with the bullshit because "OMG, oppression, my feels, and the CriticismBeGone" attribute the feminist shroud carries with it whenever anyone criticizes a woman, ESPECIALLY about "women's issues". Objectively point out why Anita Sarkeesian is full of shit, a con-artist, and an opportunist "Lol, f…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:27 PM
13

It is in part how and why she ended up coming out with her real name as to establish dominance in the DMCA claims. It was skeezy of them (feminists), but in the long run I think it hurt them more than they would have wanted in hindsight as now the name Karen Straughan is increasingly coming into the public spotlight (Go Karen!). If those DMCA trolls could go back in time I bet they would have preferred biting their tongues. Feminism has an amazing capacity of digging itself deeper if you just le…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:23 PM
-4

I've been reading all the responses to your thread and upvoting most of the primary (first tier) responses. You do realize, however, that an inverted question posed on any other gender political board would get instantly deleted and the poster would get banned, right? I am annoyed that gender poltics outside of the MRA sphere has been so stifled and "echo chambered" that serious and level discussion of women's issues now apparently can only happen on a men's rights board. "What about the womenz?…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:39 PM
13

The bait lasted less than a month when they first came on the scene before the switch. The tell-tale signs were that first month's worth of articles weren't saying anything substantive and avoided like the plague any subject that negatively influenced men that could be tied to feminism. It's essentially a white-washing portal for feminist dogma that's then marketed to men who are googling "men's Rights".
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:06 PM
12

He wrote it off becuase he is in the dog house concerning feminism. H. Schwyzer is off his axis and has been for quite some time, hell, to the point of pitty from his detractors.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:03 PM
9

False imprisonment and kidnapping (by proxy) should be part of the weighting.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:24 PM
3

I don't know why you need a citation for the incredibly well-known, existing legal system. Then it shouldn't be too hard to find in that case, no?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:39 PM
2

Manhood101 spam. "Whichever is the case, whether truly incompetent PUAs and trad-cons, or whether Manhood Academy is an excessively foolish parody, they’re no part of the men’s human rights movement." -Manhood Academy, selling social incompetence, JtO.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:35 PM
6

Manhood101 spam. You guys are banned from here because you refuse to stop spamming advertizements to your site despite being warned about it for over 6months before the banning and have continued to persistently do so for over 2 years now. You do not discuss, you bait with some half assed formed thought then links to some bullshit with your website on it.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 01:42 AM
6

"Whichever is the case, whether truly incompetent PUAs and trad-cons, or whether Manhood Academy is an excessively foolish parody, they’re no part of the men’s human rights movement." -Manhood Academy, selling social incompetence, JtO.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:56 PM
12

Manhood101 spam
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:45 PM
9

Manhood101 spam
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:15 PM
1

Funny, your moderate in length response simply sounds like "man up". Did you not even read what I wrote?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 04:07 AM
11

I think you miss the point. Men's Rights Activists get shit on all the time, made fun of, get strawmanned to death in forums where any rebuttal will get instantly deleted and the MRA will get banned. That's not the problem here. The problem is the core "truths" that the parody sketch is trying to base itself off of are wholly untrue and is a biased feminist demonization of a Men's Rights activist. The general way parody works is it takes a truism about a subject then applies hyperbole, argumentu…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 05:10 PM
6

That's not what that sketch meant and in that case it was legitimate and valid comment.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:22 PM
4

A group made of of individuals who choose who they associate with, you can generalize. [edit] There might be a really rational, well-meaning and objective KKK member out there, but I don't care to give that particular group association the benefit of the doubt. I feel the same way about SRS.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 08:37 PM
11

He is self proclaimed but is rational and objective enough to argue against Feminist dogma. He argues against some Feminist dogma so effectively I consider him in the same sort of position as C.H. Sommers, who thinks herself a feminist but has contributed greatly to the airing of its dirty laundry.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:44 PM
1

Or were you just simply criticizing people without actually advocating for an alternative? Not people, an ideology, and simply pointing out the things that I find problematic. You do see what you did there, right? You are tying a philosophical ideology to a person's identity and then using that as a pivot trying to frame my criticisms of the IDEOLOGY as a personal attack against "people". Really dude? You are inadvertently proving my point.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:36 AM
1

I don't see a refutation there and implying that the choice is only between the above three is disingenuous. As it pertains to gender politics and it's wider influence on public policy making, barring any other "choices", what attention to men's rights has brought is far better than folding the momentum into an egalitarian movement. If that were to happen we would quickly find ourselves back in the corner waiting for table scraps a-la "Feminism helps men too". I think you are projecting your own…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:02 PM
-3

I simply don't trust most of the things that come out of the mouths of "natural born" egalitarians. While your intentions might both be good and objectively equal, most egalitarians I have seen and read are marginal refugees trying to distance themselves from the sour smell and taste feminism is increasingly being recognized for. But that's the thing, this is how first and second wave feminism started, with the noblest of intentions, but it didn't get the majority of it's power until it started …
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:28 PM
0

Most of the egalitarians that I have spoken to that were not born from the men's rights movement ignore differences in biology. Most egalitarianism outside of MRM influence is truly Feminism 2.0 (the honeymoon stage).
/r/MensRights05/03/14 03:14 PM
11

FIRST LADY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON FIRST LADIES’ CONFERENCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SAN SALVADOR, EL SALVADOR -- NOVEMBER 17, 1998 (AS DELIVERED)
/r/MensRights05/03/14 03:01 PM
1

It is then an example of social bias.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 10:56 AM
5

Manhood101 spam.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 12:16 AM
6

Hip hip..
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:15 PM
3

Can women really work the same jobs as men? In general? Yes, yes they can. Can women really work the same jobs as men and be equally productive? That's a different question. Catfights over handbags and tears in the toilets. When this producer launched a women-only TV company she thought she'd kissed goodbye to conflict... Currently Political correctness an SJWs along with Feminists have a bubbled demilitarize zone around discussing or even bringing up the subject of differences in mental facilit…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 03:23 PM
10

I give you the next president of the United States of America; "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children." -Hillary Rodham Clinton
/r/MensRights21/02/14 03:10 PM
2

Plenty incentive to lie, to garner attention for the "lulz", no incentive to tell the truth since everything is unverifiable.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:02 AM
3

Which is why we shouldn't use unverifiable anecdotes as examples. There are real-life examples. Also, the story reads like an exaggeration. Cops sharing what they did with a subject of the investigation? Yeah, doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 12:40 AM
142

It's 4 chan and green text. Should be treated with less tolerance than Facebook screencaps.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 02:08 PM
14

OJ got away with it, not because he was a man, but because he was rich.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 10:01 AM
1

Whether one is better off is not necessarily related to whether society recognizes your humanity or respects or honors it. Being better off or even successful can and has happened in-spite of it.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 11:52 AM
2

Dude be happy that she's supporting this. Thanks for the table scraps. And I'd say exactly the same thing if it were a man "Waking up" just because it happened to his sons, but the thing with men is they don't need as son to experience some of these things themselves. Mine isn't a commentary on what women think, but what people think.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 01:58 AM
3

While there are no direct links in formal government studies, many women's shelters in canada and other non-profit organizations in internal memos report that there is a slight surge of human sex trafficking whenever Karen Straughan gives a speech on a campus hosted by that particular city or town. While the internal records are not peer-reviewd, they are very compelling and at least deserve more attention (funding). The XYZ ladies of Fillinyourfeelgoodstokenland have now pushed for one of the h…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 12:01 AM
9

Snap.... crrrrrrackle... pop baby /cheesybaseline
/r/MensRights08/02/14 11:53 PM
-17

Negative. The humanity of males is exactly where it was before (or very slowly getting better). Males in general are better off. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 11:44 PM
45

As a mother of 2 sons, That's the problem so far, generally speaking only those with some sort of personal vested interest come out with information like this and take stands like this. If she had exclusively two or three daughters instead I doubt the blinders would have come off as easily. The humanity of males is no better off despite all these "awakenings"
/r/MensRights08/02/14 05:28 PM
1

To contribute to part of your point; "It is amazing to me how people will believe such lies so easily." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWI58bgdVfw&feature=share
/r/MensRights31/01/14 03:22 PM
11

http://consad.com/index.php?page=an-analysis-of-reasons-for-the-disparity-in-wages-between-men-and-women Consad study commissioned by the US Department of Labor.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 06:51 AM
1

I am completely aware that you go to jail for not paying G child support. ...and the charge under which you go to jail is contempt of court.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 02:39 AM
1

Your ignorance, it burns.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 01:30 AM
8

And go to jail for contempt of court.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:27 PM
2

Manhood Spam.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 08:43 PM
4

The List.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 11:48 PM
3

No.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 11:43 PM
2

I'm not white washing anything, I too think it's bullshit. Lack of oversight has made it a back-door alimony that tends to be awarded to one particular gender (without oversight of course!) more than another. It's like how DV laws are written in gender neutral language, but the various evaluative criteria is heavily biased against one particular gender.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:49 PM
1

There is no problem with the logic, I'm not saying that's the way it should be, I'm pointing out that's the way courts interpret the concept when it comes under scrutiny. Generally speaking, sperm banks keep donors anonymous and there have been recent cases where the state (Australia IIRC) have been fighting to remove that protection (anonymity) precisely for the purpose of holding doners liable for support. That said, going through a 3rd party, medically licensed, ads a layer of protection.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:25 PM
1

Cui bono?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 11:51 AM
2

"Of those who have been shot, or shot at, what % happens to be male?" Statistics for you.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 11:45 AM
2

This is the thing about Child support and contracts many don't understand. There are 3 parties involved here, and one of them didn't sign the contract. Child support isn't an obligation between one parent and another. Child support is an obligation from one parent to a child. That obligation cannot be signed away by someone below mental capacity or legal age to do so.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 11:25 AM
5

Because college is where many go to find their future spouse, not necessarily their gainful career path.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:58 PM
3

Amazing play/film. The film is hard to watch at times (it's very static) but it's still fantastic, I don't know how to explain it. I love Mamet but you can't watch one of his movies while tired. The payoff of the film is amazing, but it needs the build up. If you approach it as a play and not a film, it's easy to get through.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 12:31 AM
2

The singularity, do you even converge bro?
/r/MensRights15/11/13 05:58 PM
2

Start with the word "allegedly"?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:32 PM
2

Poe?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:36 PM
1

I always gauge it's growth by "users right now" for "real" trends. /r/MR actually has a rather high "users right now" relative to it's total subscriptions size compared to other subreddits.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:19 PM
10

Agree, and further, I've seen it and have had it argued against me that Political correctness "Doesn't exist". In that, the construct as you just described it is made up by those who would denounce it's use to control speech. Few things made me as angry as watching those large and tightly knotted circles come back in on themselves when some freshman feminist thought they could lord over a particular debate by claiming Political Correctness is simply a strawman. These are the same people who are …
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:49 PM
6

That's a naive point of view. Public opinion is not swayed by logic or calm demeanor. Politeness gets ignored or fades into the background. I discuss from a compartmentalized place, but to write without feeling restricts your audience to a minority. See: Any historic speaker- Nearly all deferred to emotion over logic to capture the audience. It distances us from potential allies, it alienates bystanders, it is so often misguided, and it's generally a harmful and counterproductive emotion. The on…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:39 AM
1

"But not all scorpions are like that."
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:03 AM
1

I haven't personally seen them directly link TRP sub. You don't SAY?!
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:24 AM
7

What you need Natalie?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:01 AM
0

Are you asking for examples or asking if people link directly to TRP on /mr? Asking for examples of links on /r/MR or AVfM to /r/theRedPill or even the MGTOW forums, now that you bring them up.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:59 AM
2

Non sequitur says "what?" And the opposite of up, isn't left, it's down. You will never move right if you only move down. [edit] And you can hate something with every fiber of your being and still calmly and logically explain your point of view pertaining to that thing.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:34 AM
1

Link to "TRP" posts on /r/mr? I can honestly say your perception is whack and the thing that might be confusing you was how often AVfM used the red pill meme (unassociated with TheRedPill subreddit) prior to said subreddit being founded. Reading AVfM articles where they reference "the red pill" is not them referencing /r/TheRedPill you can check this by publication dates and context of articles. TheRedPill Subreddit is just Game theory re-branded, there is also /r/askmen which is feminism re-bra…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:29 AM
1

As the population of this subreddit increases the political median gets shifted toward the perceptions of the status quo. a year and a half ago AVfM's viewpoints were oft viewed as way too moderate for the MRM.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:02 AM
1

Anytime I see anyone Shoe-horn in "H" into MRM I immediately downvote as it's the same bullshit "fluid" speech manipulation that feminism does because they can't stand on the logic or arguments alone. I'll read the stuff, I'll support and upvote any article I agree with, but if I see MHRM I downvote, ignore, and move on. And I don't, agree at all, with the Benard Chapin point of view either. "MHRM" is a symbolic trimming of the ball sack in hopes that "not feminists" won't castrate MRA's with cl…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:59 AM
2

I'm recounting what I have witnessed first hand. I was there Before even AVfM (it was sort of a very splintered off-shoot of Men's News Daily). Men's News Daily caved under it's own biased conservative weight and drove away most "mid decade" MRA's. Before that there was HisSide with glenn Sacks, Angry Harry, MGTOW forums, and Fathers 4 Justice UK... that was all there was for the MRM. This was around 2001. Glenn Sacks sort of went his own "doctor Phil" way and veered away from being "Anti-femini…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:48 AM
7

A letter from a Birmingham Jail. A much more powerful message than a 5 word trope sandwhiched between 2 quotes without context.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:32 AM
2

Either way, I would love to see some evidence that AVFM is not supporting the same concepts with their "red pill", especially considering the overlap in members of the MRM and TRP. I'm not one for proving the negatives of others for them, believe me, don't, I don't care, I was simply informing. /r/theredpill "A community for 11 months" /who.is avoiceformen.com Registered On July 21, 2009
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:16 AM
1

I do hate feminists, I do think they are evil, strongly believe they are two-faced and operate are the extreme stops of presumed maliciousness. This is coming from someone who was once a feminist. If you need evidence of what I speak, look no further than Erin Prizzy's wikipedia page. "NAFALT" -No, but all their voices lift and validate the views and opinions of the ones I am referring to, so I hate all of them.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:02 AM
3

The red pill group "barrowed" the imagery from AVfM. "Red pill" has been a theme in AVfM for as long as AVfM has existed, red pill on Reddit has been around, what? A year, less?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:56 AM
2

Pearl clutching GWW, they are just ... <sup>snicker</sup> STRINGING you along! Get it.. Stringing... -seriously though It's the whole... "let my try my hardest to seem reasonable in my tone" all while I approach this with an obtuse attitude in an attempt to elicit anger from my target... but you knew that... this message is for those still tuning in.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:29 AM
3

So, to clarify, you are saying there are objective reasons to hate women as a whole group?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 01:36 AM
3

Ok, what is a good kind of mysogynist?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 01:29 AM
3

Where do I say or imply there is a good kind?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 01:22 AM
5

a misogynist ebook scam site that is sort of like a shitty cross between /r/beatingwomen and "game" theory in a 3am infomercial "motivational speaker" format that pedals the concept of machismo masculinity to emotionally vulnerable male youth. "Is your EX girlfriend a cheating slut? Give us 3 easy payments of 59.95 and we will boost your ego for 15 minutes." They are meathead misogynist bottom feeders. They latched onto this subreddit about 3 years ago and randomly spam it from time to time with…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:06 PM
5

More manhood 101 spam.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 07:19 AM
1

"Repent, REPENT I say. The soul of the potential rapist is a lost soul until you give unto the vagina all your wallets and freedoms!"
/r/MensRights28/09/13 06:32 AM
3

Manhood101 spam
/r/MensRights28/09/13 06:13 AM
9

You mis-read my post. I use Helen smith as a rare example of a woman speaking truth to power (or common but incorrect belief) I did not say Helen smith said the above. I didn't say Helen Smith didn't say the above. Helen Smith's name was used as an example of a voice that is heard where if the same thing was said by a man, they would be (and have been) ignored. She gets face time because she is a woman "speaking against her own interests" so is given more credence. The simple fact is that women …
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:50 AM
33

Exactly this. There are tons of voices who have said what GWW, TB, Helen smith, and other female spearheads in dialogue, said it better, and earlier. The reason why you didn't hear about them 10 to 15 years ago as opposed to the same messages today is because those voices were male. Feminism will portray speech about the plight of men by males as self serving while portraying speech about the plight of women by females as "insightful. Further, feminism pushes the dual line of hypocrasy that wome…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:37 AM
6

I regularly watch Jeff's stuff. For the most part he is spot on about a lot of stuff in the gaming industry. As a gamer, even if I disagree with something, I like to watch his jimquisition shows. When he confronts a point it's fantastic as long as it has nothing to do with the gender debate. That said, he is so heavily "indoctronated" with the Feminist brand koolaid you can practically see when he turns on the old college cuircuit brakers when he enguages his "Gender studies" drive. The man is v…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:40 AM
1

No no; NAFALT, #WhatDoesThisHaveToDoWithMensRights, @BigRedSockPuppetAccount MUCS SIC YHCRAIRYK Stop trying to derail the thing we aren't talking about!
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:56 PM
4

Further: Men, on a genetic level, are less "healthy" than women. It's a field of research Marianne Legato is involved in. She gave a presentation at a 2011 male studies conference. Part 1 Part 2 Her presentation, IIRC, is in Part II. They are LOOOOONG - The above are just citations, I don't expect anyone to watch them fully, but I have multiple times. They are fantastic primary sources from actual scientists (until the stupid "marketer"). It's completely a myth that women need more health attent…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:13 PM
-2

Your mistake; Feminist ≠ Woman
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:16 PM
1

On your first bullet point, you also forgot "ones that were false, but the conviction stood and no one was the wiser"
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:31 AM
11

I feel this is a small step in the right direction for feminists because it admits that men aren't always more privileged than women, depending on other forms of discrimination (such as race, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status). You misunderstand. They are falling back onto something like Intersectionality (they would fall back on anything) to explain away and then further dismiss any disadvantage men have or any privilege women have as "a symptom of patriarchy". In other words, the old…
/r/MensRights20/09/13 02:53 PM
4

I don't hear from my friend for a couple of days (unusual), and then I get message saying: sending that means you want to be right, and that means you don't want dialog, and if there is no room for dialog, there is no room for friendship. Please don't contact me again. Bolded is the illogical overture, anything that follows is fruit from the poisonous tree and is actually just self-delusion so they get to blame you for the "breakup". Also, not much of a friend. All my friends agree or disagree, …
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:34 AM
5

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html Here you go. A 2 hour Harvard debate between Steven Pinker and Elizabeth Spelke on why the greater variance in IQ exists in males compared to females. Not "if" bt WHY. - In many scientific fields it is a known observation that this exists. It's not a case of opinion, or perspective. Stop with feeding yourself bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:17 AM
2

While I can't speak to whether it's true or not, one possible explanation is that it is an acceptable risk in males, but not females. For example, it could be that because females are weaker, they would need a higher minimum intelligence to survive. Men don't fight with women over mating rights. Men fight with other men for mating rights/opportunities and are judged by women. This is why women do not need to be physically strong, their reproductive investment is in demand (9+ months) so they are…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:17 AM
2

"Equality" is impossible for a simple reason. "Define equality" Equality of outcome is diametrically opposed to Equality of opportunity when the two things you seek to balance are inherently different.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:23 PM
2

SRS is now a known quantity and reddit at large now understands their true intentions and motivations. They were far more potent when people believed their intentions where as honorable as they claimed. Now they are relatively irrelevant and everyone just ignores/dismisses them.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 01:35 AM
2

Women Firefighters: The Gender Boondoggle -8 pages, worth it, directly related.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:02 PM
2

Have not seen that particular TED talk, but the "faking it" long enough for the "new normal" to set in does work. If you can go from now till tomorrow and not kill that person that cut you off in traffic, tomorrow to the day after is far easier. That's what was so compelling for me reading your post. This all seems "Fresh" yet you have the perspective you espoused in the entry above. It's why I kept reading. As for being noble or not. A large part of that is intention, hell, one could argue all …
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:44 AM
3

Read through your post. I have to commend you for your... Not sure what to call it. Personal responsibility? Accountability? Autonomy? -Fresh wound and all, you are able to objectively look at the situation and that is amazingly commendable. It only gets easier with time (the emotional part of the equation). I can't speak for him, nor am I looking to defend him, but if I were in his shoes, and all of the above happened between us, the "indirect contributions (through mom?)" would probably be my …
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:14 AM
2

Immediately scrolled Yup. Boy About to be in teenage years. Progress, but the bare minimum.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:00 AM
0

Then you know that the crime you plead guilty to isn't necessarily the crime that you performed... right?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:40 AM
4

Actually, considering her gender, no, she isn't lucky. She is actually being held accountable for her actions to some degree. Most women would have just been let off with a warning.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:38 AM
-6

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plea_bargain
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:30 AM
1

Indeed, see: Subsets of vegitarianism and veganism Extremes in Religions Anti-vaccine families An two inherently bad people who bred.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:24 AM
2

Except no, the first person says "they are oppressing you" and then last person is convinced "they are oppressing me."
/r/MensRights13/09/13 12:45 PM
1

I did chuckle and am ending the night on a high note -SLEEEP.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:15 AM
7

I personally cannot stand "Rediquette nazis". You reminding someone who downvotes "to disagree" that it's against rediquette will achieve nothing. I personally only downvote (on this sub) incorrect information (false), blatant lies, logical fallacies, or ideological propaganda -or- anything that used the above as a spring-board to their current subject. I'd say nearly all the calls for "rediquette restraint" in downvoting have been to the "aid" of one of the above in #2. On occasion I will deep …
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:40 AM
0

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html [edit] That isn't a debate on whether or not males exhibit higher populations at the two extremes of the IQ curve, but a debate as to why. That it is, is not in dispute. [2nd Edit] And I ask again, when do you think girls were doing "worse" than boys in school?
/r/MensRights12/09/13 03:48 PM
-1

I love the sexism coming from the comments section. Remember when girls were doing worse than boys in school? When do you think this was? [Edit] Oh, you mean the math thing. Ok, now I know you are full of shit.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 12:05 PM
8

theres legitmate issues for sure, however the subreddit MensRights has a lot of people saying that there are " shitty people in there who fall into the same "feminist" stereotype of women > men (except the male version)" FTFY Got a link to the comments of these women hating men?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 07:52 PM
115

Right now most know the things the MRM talks about are valid and true. Every once in a while something peeks through the general psyche of society reminding us of this. Then the torrent of angry feminist hashtags chills the discussion for another 3 or so months.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:10 PM
6

refuting the actual data rather than slamming a group Far more often than not, those are seen as the same thing.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 03:17 PM
-4

Pragmatism is not an ally of civil rights.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:58 PM
12

Feminists tend to interpret fact finding as bashing, don't believe me? Start posting relevant facts with citation in /r/feminism or /r/askfeminists that conflict with their fantasy view.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:56 PM
5

What could happen in 24 hours to make you go from accusing someone of being the type of criminal convicted felons don't even like in prison, to "Oh whoopsie-daisy, I called the wrong play."? BPD
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:16 PM
15

Not feminist-bashing, Who do you think is primarily responsible for such a slanted report?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:12 PM
7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WNBA_on_ESPN The inequalities you "See" are the result of the fundamental differences (physically) between men and women. You are essentially saying "Nature is sexist" because men, on average, are stronger in nearly every physical metric when compared to women. You are delusional and running your argument in circles and through hoops.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 03:52 AM
8

If salaries are controlled by market forces and society, how does that make sports institutions sexist? Or even the disparity in sports salaries? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_records_in_swimming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_athletics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycling_records
/r/MensRights11/09/13 03:18 AM
6

Compare salaries of female athletes to salaries of male athletes. You are saying compare salaries of athletes based on gender, which you surmise are different. I am asking you what do you think controls those salaries and the respective differences. And you are asking "how is that relevant"?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 03:00 AM
5

What do you think controls the salaries of professional athletes?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:50 AM
4

How is it sexist against women? I am really curious about this now.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:43 AM
1

Most of my sources are the FBI. Link to the page/pdf supplying your numbers?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:38 AM
6

Those roads that take you to work in 30 minutes? Guess what happens if there is no public transportation.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:22 AM
5

I learned about her from ManWomanMyth a couple years ago. (all his videos are great, but he bowed out for a bit of a rest from the MRM rat race) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhliqceyoL8 His youtube channel is still available but his site is not.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:12 PM
13

Introduce her to the Erin Prizzy AMAs! http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1cbrbs/hi_im_erin_pizzey_ask_me_anything/ http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1d7toq/hi_im_erin_pizzey_founder_of_the_first_womens/ Those will be two bitter pills she simply can't ignore.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:58 PM
12

FYI: If every single male who did not want to be a father (but was being compelled by the government) were to take the same exact action as this case, without hesitation, laws would change overnight to include financial abortion as an option. The hypocrisy happens because it is allowed to happen.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:18 PM
4

When/Why/How did law enforcement become switched to revenue generation? When departments started to benefit from a share of financial exchange as a form of punishment. And how can it be fixed/reformed? Remove all financial ties to departments from punishment. If someone is found guilty of a speeding ticket, or whatever, and they get a fine, every cent gets put into an account controlled by a random selection of individuals from the community, like jury duty. This "administrative duty" can be ser…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:13 PM
5

911 call Zimmerman's wife made. I didn't listen to the whole thing, felt like a waste of time. I'll wait for a summary of events in written form. IMO you aren't missing anything.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:20 PM
3

Putting on airs.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:16 PM
2

Life of Julia.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:59 AM
38

It is not CPS's job to protect children or facilitate equitable custody. It is CPS's job to line the pockets of the state government and aid in the preservation of their own existence. The easiest way to do this is to vilify fathers no matter the situation. He was "Guilty", it was just a matter of finding out "of what".
/r/MensRights09/09/13 10:37 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 04:15 PM
6

The First Blog About Men's Issues. Those words, I don't think they mean what you think they mean. AngryHarry.com Record created on 11-Jan-2001 And I don't even know if he is the first.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 11:17 AM
1

The correct statistics do not show equal pay, they show a significantly smaller gap than claimed. How much smaller a gap?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 11:10 AM
3

I'm also not denying that it's human nature This entire thread is you doing just that.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:36 PM
3

I am just pointing out your mistake, I'm not actually taking a side. It just annoys me when people peddle their "sides" point of view by attributing faults in human nature to just one subset of, in this case, political thinking. The irony is you yourself are wrapped in your own belief blanket in thinking I am arguing for one side or another and then taking an offensive stance from your ideological position.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:30 PM
3

never underestimate the socialist/progressive's ability to believe, with all of their heart and soul, something that has no basis in logic General statement implies we are with the exclusion of. [Edit] And you were going on about something to do with logic? For shame!
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:19 PM
4

Anyone's ability. See: Creationism
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:14 PM
3

Further, the irony is that the conditioning and drive for any human being to succeed, would ratchet-up the hypergamous nature of those women who strive to succeed like someone looking to make more than "men". They don't settle for the easy job, or the median salary, or being passed over for promotion. They won't be able to settle for "anything less" in their personal lives either. They very well may end up pricing themselves out of even equal or "moderately superior" men because of the very ment…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:43 AM
8

But as long as we're on reddit, we have to abide by the selective application of rules as they choose to apply them. FTFY
/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:25 PM
15

This account has been shadowbanned before. I got it un-shadowbanned (very rare occurence) and you are off base. I was simply shadow banned because another subreddit spammed my account with reports because they didn't like what I said (not even in their subreddit, but this one, Men's Rights). It was because my post got a lot of attention and then was cross-posted (not by me) to another more popular subreddit, where it got even more (positive) attention (still not the subreddit of the spam report …
/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:22 PM
1

Land fertile, no, Land, sea, and marsh, yes, actually, it is. Once again, if hunting were not a requirement, it wouldn't' have been done. If it was so easy, the ratio wouldn't have been 20/80.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:09 PM
0

No. You must remember that today, hunters/foragers only occupy the most marginal of niches, like the Kalahari desert - but even there, there's no shortage of prey. They live harsh lives in many ways, but it's rarely starvation that kills them. In prehistory, when hunters/foragers lived in the most fertile and plentiful regions of the world, how much easier mustn't it have been. No No. The only place on earth that had enough sustenance to not require an agrarian society and technology was the Flo…
/r/MensRights06/09/13 10:35 AM
1

Also, hunting would have been mostly failure after failure followed by fleeting successes. Hunting all the time probably resulted in that 20%. If hunting were not important they wouldn't have hunted and both men and women would have gathered berries. It's a false dichotomy.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 01:14 AM
6

It's when two men abuse one woman at the same time.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:05 PM
1

...Ok?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:20 AM
1

https://www.google.com/search?q=Women+have+always+been+the+primary+victims+of+war&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:08 AM
31

Women have always been the primary victims of male workplace deaths. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons to dangerous work environments. Women often have to get work for themselves after living the only privileged life they have ever known. Women are often the indirect casualties from layoffs and sometimes, more frequently in today’s marketplace, beneficiaries. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of supporting themselves.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:05 AM
42

Concluding Paragraph: "The growing gender gap in education alone is not responsible falling marriage rates, but it has worked to disenfranchise less-educated women from the marriage market excluding them, and their children, from the economic privileges that go hand in hand with marriage." Entire article about how the education system failing men is hurting women's social accessory prospects. And the article doesn't know why the marriage "Market" is drying up. -Further, the entire thing reads li…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:08 PM
13

The MRM, on the other hand, believe that there is legal discrimination against men, Legal discrimination against men is not a belief or theory, sorry, but a fact. Stop hedging your language to sound "balanced" it tarnishes reality when repeated enough. See: The Draft Gender Genital Mutilation Tender years doctrine and it's lasting effects Primary Aggressor Laws Duluth model Dear Colleague letter
/r/MensRights02/09/13 09:23 AM
2

Indeed. People hopping on for a month thinking the sub is trending downward missed out on all the storm front and real misogyny that used to be rampant on these pages. slowly but surely bullies and brutes "got frustrated" at how "not hateful" the sub was becoming and ran off. Now you have people bitching about not white-washing facts and trying to police tone and objective subject matter.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:28 AM
1

It is simple fact that women are underrepresented in STEM fields. Why is that?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:10 PM
0

image search
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:07 PM
3

So you mean highest level UAC on Windows 7?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 08:47 PM
2

I am replying to you on the "furthest from the top" comment. I just wanted to add my voice to the pile of dislike of "The Good Men Project". I will never read an article from that site or visit it if I can help it. Many have explained to you why. When I see the domain name I automatically downvote the site. They are especially "dangerous" because they are a rather well funded and wide net with which they catch disenfranchised men and start feeding them bullshit. This is not to say your article i…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:44 AM
-1

Wow, someone snapped a spine performing that twist of logic.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:51 AM
1

I've read your wall, on the wall itself, I think you equivocate too much on stances. Half of it is you apologizing in advance to SRS of all places. I don't really care what your actual stances are if you apply intellectual rigor to their formation. I personally would rather hear new points of view based on some evidence that support things I don't agree with than to hear one of those things I do agree with. I enjoy being wrong. Being wrong is a glorious thing that, with some intellectual honesty…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:56 AM
3

I don't know how they've weaseled their way into liberal thought, considering the cornerstone of liberal philosophy is skepticism and these people ban skepticism outright. Lots and lots of appeals to emotion. Sorry to burst any "liberal" or "progressive" bubbles out there, but liberals, at times, seem more susceptible to appeals to emotion than any other group. Most people stop using and respecting logic the moment it starts conflicting with their own motivations and interests.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:07 PM
3

You can bad mouth mom, just not in the kid's journal. Do pick up a rant journal. They help immensely.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:01 AM
11

Go get a simple journal and write any thoughts you wish you could tell your son down inside of it and date it. It's not a rant journal (get one of those too). Anytime your son comes to mind, write down whatever is there along with him. Anytime you miss him, write that down too. Date the entries. It's a poor replacement for actually being with your son, but it's better than not being able to tell him how you feel at all. Keep it up while trying for visitation and what/have you. When he grows olde…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:03 AM
8

The above cited case was the story that got me into the MRM ~2001-2002
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:35 PM
4

Letter of the law vs. Spirit of the law. I am pretty sure this doesn't qualify. Letter of the law vs. Spirit of the law. I am pretty sure this doesn't qualify.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:30 PM
3

Keep a journal. Anytime you think about your kids, write to them. Write to them in either letters or a journal and date them. Save these letter/journal for when they are out of the house and older. ~25 might be a good age (when they might start thinking about families themselves). The kids will grow up and eventually mom's bullshit will wear off and wash away. They will then start asking questions quietly to themselves that those letter and journal will help with. Mom is setting herself up to be…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:29 PM
5

Letter of the law vs. Spirit of the law. I am pretty sure this doesn't qualify.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:23 PM
1

Second (or third?) the safety razor suggestion. My only regret was not getting one sooner. Blades are so insanely cheap (relative to cartridges) that you will be wondering why there aren't more people using them.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:23 PM
1

Non sequitur
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:44 PM
4

arrest dubai kiss
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:12 PM
2

Just because you put this idiocy in easily consumed comic form does not make it correct, logical, or entertaining.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:51 PM
2

Their language doesn't need work, their attitude does. This isn't a case of "whoops, typo!" this is a case of them white-washing the issue and really just repeating the same old line, just now they strongly imply instead of openly accuse.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:04 AM
4

Don't worry, the Brazilian women study was inconclusive. Now they are seeking to do a study on the smoking habits of Peruvian women.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:49 AM
8

I call it Riding the Poe Pipe.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:51 PM
2

I've been browsing 4chan since 2006, Did you blush while writing that? Now I know you are out of touch with what you are dealing with - that you think that statement would A) matter and B) wouldn't in itself be reason enough to trample you because of hubris... your naivete is dangerous. hasn't raided anything of value in a loooong time let alone organized a DDoS attack of any kind whatsoever. Is it even possible to DDoS a subreddit without a massive botnet? No, /b/ just hasn't "shocked" Mainstre…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:23 PM
2

nfortunately, you might g The problem with most people involved with feminism is that they won't listen to an opposing view unless it's a female voice. And then only with the expectation of refuting that opposing view. A male voice, no matter how rational or calm, would never get listened to. This is why GWW has gotten so much attention. The things she says have been said before, many times, in all manner of formats including video, but had been ignored because it came from male voices. It's not…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:04 PM
2

You are a complete idiot if you think ads on 4chan will achieve anything more than marking us or AVfM as potential troll targets. 4chan is a headless mob at the best of times and no one is safe. What are you, "12"? Notice most of the ads on 4chan don't do anything but link back to 4chan? And the few that don't are for organizations with no complex goals. -Porn/adult toys or DuckDuckGo. Show me a single ideological add on 4chan and I'll show you a site that gets DDOSed to shit just because the si…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:52 PM
7

Don't you know? Boys are stupid, the solution is to throw rocks at them.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:45 PM
15

Actually really good video. Toward the mid part I thought, for a moment she was going to slide back into being comfortable with the status quo. I was impressed. It's funny, I want to warn her "Keep up the skepticism, on both sides". -which it looks like she will do. Because of how the MRM has to fight, a one sentence statement tends to have to have pages of justification behind that statement. If newer minds just start parroting that statement without having the pages of justification in the bac…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:00 PM
6

"10 year old boy arrested for allegedly raping a 4 year old girl" would never get any defense on behalf of the boy.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:06 PM
0

Of those three, if I could only read one, which would you choose?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:46 PM
1

Oh, don't worry, unfortunately I know all too well what BPD is, I lived 7 years of it in my last relationship.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:58 PM
2

You want to throw down? Alright, I had my Wheaties this morning, lets throw down. Woah woah woah, that summary is totally unfair. Accurate is now unfair, know who you sound like? It's nothing to do with feelings and acceptance. The simple fact of the matter is that politics is an art of managing public opinion and if you damage that then all hope is lost. The first sentence is a contradiction of the second. What does that mean? Well it means that the way you present a case is just as important a…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:57 PM
2

MR still has men trying to act like women, which is why it wont get any serious traction. No, the serious traction is lost because of places like the red pill and manhood academy. Men's rights still has to have women do all the speaking for them, to get noticed. Why is that do you think?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:56 PM
6

I'm a long-time lurker Too much of our thought and discussion is prejudiced and vitriolic in a way which threatens the credibility of everyone who calls themselves an MRA. The latter statement disproves the former... unless you have an issue with reading comprehension. To me, men's rights exists... Opinion, can be ignored. Today I believe... Opinion, can be ignored. I'm concerned with... ..uh huh, keep going ...with anecdotal evidence or sources articles which are alarmingly self-affirming. As o…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:51 PM
9

It's actually a great thing to observe. Just because some people join or call themselves atheists, skeptics, or whatever... doesn't make it so. I have a strong feeling what you are seeing with Atheism+ is a subset of academia "understanding" that critical thinking is a valued attribute and that subset thinks they can learn to critically think through osmosis by inserting themselves into clubs and associations renowned for thinking critically. What has instead happened is the emotional thinkers h…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:42 PM
13

M-101 has been around for years now. They are simply "you are the millionth visitor, claim your prize" PUA Scam artists. The actual PUA community (which I have no love for) is a veritable bastion of intellect and compassion by comparison. M-101 used to openly spam this subreddit (about ~2-3 years ago) with walls of text where every FUCKING explitive was capitalized while calling people FUCKING CUNTS and whiney LITTLE BITCHES. The wall of text would go on for some time with an introduction that w…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:14 PM
1

My doubt benefits ran out sometime in 2009, sorry.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:35 PM
5

By the way, the people downvoting you are most likely feminists waiting in the shadows because a female voice against their views is (unfortunately) worth more than 10 male voices (see Typhon Blue, GWW, Helen Smith, CH Sommers, Erin Prizzy). On to your comment. There have always been girls who liked games or geek girls who were ostracized right along with geek guys (80s-2000). They did not "all of a sudden" decide to join the geek ranks. The reason why you haven't seen an issue over "geek gurls"…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:17 PM
8

Which is why feminists are getting upset over it, along with the "Fake geek girls". They don't like being questioned. -And that's where a lot of the hostility is coming from, that impass.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:09 PM
17

I've read your entire post and a lot of what you describe I've seen on Dr. Tara's site. http://www.shrink4men.com/ She contributes regularly over at A Voice for Men, but her focus has been on the toxicity in some relationships and how there are no real resources for "men". I imagine you would find a lot of informed insight there. I do believe she also has online options for counseling. It's not a brush-off, but I don't feel like an authority on the matter. I do know that "time" is one of the mai…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:51 PM
2

I don't mind looking away and staying silent, I have for the most part and am in agreement of "ignoring and moving on". What I am bringing my voice up for is this new idea coming from some participants. The idea is to adopt Hugo in the MRM fold. -that I won't personally stand for. From my point of view he has no place "here" and that's me stating it nicely. I'm holding back the caustic vitriol because it is currently unnecessary.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:30 PM
4

His actions do not serve the various ideologies he has espoused to. His actions are designed to server only himself, and only in getting caught being any manner of "less" than he portrays himself to be, he breaks down, which is another level of self-serving (attention). I would not mind him joining our side if he is genuinely wishes to. Go back and read everything he has written about feminism, the MRM, men and women. You would mind then.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:20 PM
0

Some yes, but when speaking in generalities, they are not stronger than men. This isn't opinion, this is fact, one that you seem angry at. There is nothing wrong with being physically weaker than the other gender, just like there is nothing wrong with not being able to bear children. It just is. But you go ahead and keep thinking that women can do everything men can do, and then blaming discrimination when that isn't actually the case. It makes you look irrational and ignorant.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:48 PM
1

Oh, no, I get it. I'm not saying Wikipedia is useless. It's an amazingly useful tool... but that's part of the problem. It's an amazingly useful tool so any block to be legitimized by that tool (omitted relevance) is an inadvertent blow. Feminism knows this and their already established cabal of Wiki editors make it their primary priority from allowing the MRM any foothold on Wikipedia, no matter how factual, cite-able, or truthful the information may be. Factual and truthful? "Not relevant". Th…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:49 PM
0

The (feminist) insistence and drive through disproportionate funding and quotas that women can do anything men can do. Forcing the hands of firehouses and districts to get women into firefighting positions nation wide (LA being a focused sample). That drive's complete and utter failure described over about 7 pages. Women aren't stronger than men (physically) Feminism constantly insists they are as strong (physically) This simply is not true... despite the feminist fantasy.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:11 PM
0

I didn't question if you were literate, I questioned if you went ahead and applied that literacy to the link. and 2. are covered in the linked article.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:57 PM
7

they never have any substantive answers for me That's the thing, guy or girl, a "nerd/geek" by the "mystical in hip status" that it is now... a genuine one is a nerd/geek because of a strong focused interest... in their interests. This strong intrerest then spills out and is reflected in their life, clothing, language, mannerisms and peripheral possessions. This trait, which I know the Japanese called Otaku (ignoring the mag/site for a second - and I am sure you already knew this). Isn't very co…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:48 AM
1

Enjoyed the read/insight from your experience. You and I are different in our world view. There are gaps in what your world view is that I would normally ask questions of but won't as I would only do so to "challenge" a statement of yours, but this is not that. While reading through your little expose above, you, on multiple occasions, reminded me of one of my favorite videos (about atheism) that I recommend. You may have already seen it in your atheism travels, but just in case... "Science save…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:03 AM
1

Forget ever giving the reasoning why men got the general vote before women (conscription). To this day I have to fight with my college educated friends over the distinction. They default to "we must agree to disagree"... concerning a fact?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:23 PM
1

In terms of physical exertion, nature already did that.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:14 PM
3

Wikipedia was subjected to (something similar). Their bias is through omission. It's not that they support openly false statements about the Men's Rights Movement, they just disallow a lot of entries associated with the Men's Rights Movement under the banner of "not relevant globally". Meanwhile any garage indy band can get their name "immortalized" on Wikipedia without the feminists even batting an eyelash.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:10 PM
1

Nothing And that's my point.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:06 PM
1

the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men So what's the difference between a "feminist" and an "equality feminist"?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:57 PM
0

So you didn't read the link, I take it.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 10:27 PM
-1

Women Firefighters: The Gender Boondoggle 8 pages Whomever the 15-member City Council and Villaraigosa decide to blame next, the fact is that Los Angeles is not unique. Cities trying and failing to turn women into firefighters range from New York, with its less than 1 percent female crews, to San Francisco, with its 13.8 percent — a stat that seems impressive, but which is generously padded with paramedics who do not fight fires or live at firehouses. Jon McDuffie, first vice president of the L.…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 09:19 PM
2

Their pool is the average college graduate. The pool is representative of the average college curriculum. I don't know why this concept doesn't scare more people.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:24 PM
8

I mean you don't seriously have that much against gender equality feminists, right? What's the definition of feminism in the dictionary?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:16 PM
24

Let it be a warning for the NAFALT "MRA's" who think Feminsim is compatible with the Men's Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:01 PM
3

1 "You can't tell me that for all the women who've graduated from university and entered the workforce in recent decades that only one-tenth of them are up to the task of running a company or sitting on a board." 2 This is supposedly the main point of injustice propelling this article and it's bunged up beyond belief. She can't even competently make her own argument, much less account for counter-arguments. Goto 1.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:27 PM
2

replying to save anecdote.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:13 PM
1

I don't want to just repeat what others have said that is both accurate in my view and would embody my position, so do not look at this response as a "complete response", but instead of a gap-filler to the things not yet addressed... to which there are only two. First, The wage gap myth. (you use 67 cents as an off-hand comparison). The irony is that the wage gap (67-79 cents, whatever, it floats around 3/4) is a gross misrepresentation that has "long" been refuted. It was first logically discou…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 01:03 PM
2

He isn't anymore, but for a long time he was a favored son of Feminism and that's where he garnered a lot of his previous support. Since they cast him out once his hypocrisy became too great to ignore, he has been spending his remaining limelight of mediocrity on rambling focus of introspection and "insight" that he has convinced himself is revolutionary. In truth it is the self deception of a damaged mind trying to grasp onto the last thread of relevancy. I almost pity him.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:38 PM
4

"Not all Feminists are like that!" but you instantly react with anger and rejection of my attempt to communicate. Because those who reacted have heard your pitch scores if not hundreds of times over the years and have seen it argued from both sides at length. So much so there are multiple videos, a multitude of written articles, and even comics written about it. Further- I used to waste my time trying to logically build a case for people like you to see how misinformed you are... but you get bur…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 04:45 PM
13

talking about how women only earn 75 cents to every dollar men earn. You ask them to tell you "Why do women earn ~75 cents to every dollar a man makes". they will invariably either say "I don't know" "it's complicated" or lie. You can then simply refute or clairfy the claim using studies or A relatively short video If something is a false statement, but you are unsure exactly how it is false, but know it is, start asking for the justifications for that statement and the lack of support or bad su…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 01:04 PM
8

I agree on the anecdotal level. There are gamers, hardcore gamers who happen to be female, but there are far more "Girl gamers" out there, and part of the MO is to make themselves known. Long time ago, back in my WoW days (vanilla) there was "the" server "girl gamer". This was in the VOIP/Voice chat infancy age, before skype when you needed a TS/Vent server. Funny enough, this was during a gaming era before the label "Gamer Girl" was coined. I don't remember the label in WoW, but there was a spe…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:42 AM
1

It also tries to weigh the argument with the presumption that development and maturity are a linear function and they don't plateau or change slope. Thanks for pointing out the Hugo source. Saved me a click. Fuck that guy.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:20 AM
6

Those books being written now are in response to men reacting to society and discussing it (over the internet). 40 years ago the same was simply not possible and man's nature had him convinced "I'm the only one bothered by this, but pushing forwards selflessly is what I should do, it's what I was taught was the right thing to do". With the advent and proliferation of the internet there are voices and materials that nurture that initial "I am bothered by this" feeling and lend evidence and suppor…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:48 AM
3

That's fine. I myself reserve swearing as to preserve its potency, but there always exists instances where swearing is warranted, these are dependent on each respective orator/writer. The thing is, I don't think Giegerwasright's use was out of line. It embodies what a lot of the "vets" feel towards newer "members" when they come on and stink up the place with their white-washed perspective. I personally found it especially frustrating that the OP used [META] tags on the main MR forum. While I do…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter