TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hamburger-Queefs Archive

View 0 posts and 295 comments by Hamburger-Queefs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Step 1: Stop your obsessive fixation on things that literally don't matter. Step 2: grow up
/r/MensRights07/04/21 05:18 PM
1

Either you're trolling or you're a child. Either way, I'm sorry you have trouble finging a gf.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 05:08 PM
1

Look, I know forming interpersonal relationships with women is hard for you, but I cannot help you with that.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 04:56 PM
1

Do you actually have a point here, or are you just a whining because you're a baby?
/r/MensRights07/04/21 03:58 PM
1

Said the guy with a fragile ego lol
/r/MensRights07/04/21 03:57 PM
1

Keep crying, kid lmao
/r/MensRights07/04/21 03:52 PM
1

Yep, and I made a concludion based on a collection of other people's conclusions. You want me to spend 6 years writing a dissertation on the subject to satisfy your fragile ego?
/r/MensRights07/04/21 03:44 PM
1

And did you read the papers at all so that you have the knowledge to refute the conclusions in the articles that you're critisizing? No? then fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 03:40 PM
1

Stop pretending to be stupid.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 03:31 PM
0

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mkiut9/lord_of_all_lies_one_if_the_oldest_tales_of_toxic/gtkyz66/
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:20 PM
1

I said initially: it's only 70% of 24% of all couples, which is ~16.8% of all couples with a female perpetrator. to which I edited it to: it's only 70% of 50% of 24% of all couples, which is ~8.4% of all couples with a female perpetrator. Because I left out the 50%. Now show me where I'm wrong or gtfo.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:37 PM
1

Ahhaha, you're not even arguing in good faith. I didn't say "HA, I found this ONE study that invalidates your claim!!!1" I said "there's multiple studies in the list that you literally provided that counters what you initially said." And what do you say to that? "Hurr durr, tekchnikally you pointed out one study and that invalidates your point because you said one study doesn't count (even though you referenced multiple studues!)"
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:35 PM
1

First study concludes: In terms of grades, 3.3% of 9th grade girls and 2.8% of 9th grade boys reported experiencing violence Second: Authors report that there were no significant differences between the sexes in self reported perpetration of physical abuse And: victimization rates are slightly higher among men than women <9% vs 7%> and in cases that involve perpetration by only one partner, more women than men were identified as perpetrators <2% vs 1%> ... women are more likely than men to throw…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:32 PM
1

Stop projecting.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:27 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:27 PM
1

Yup, and if you read any of these papers, some of them invalidate your claims ;)
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:24 PM
1

I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you over literally no one caring about your opinon.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:23 PM
1

still can't explain why I'm wrong
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:21 PM
1

Keep pretending like people take you seriously.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:19 PM
0

That 35% you quoted is a product of the 70%, no?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:14 PM
1

Yup, because I choose to not let on singluar study dictate my worldview.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:42 PM
1

Sooooo. You can't show me why I'm wrong? hmmmm....
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:42 PM
1

Lmaooooo you MRA guys are so stubborn. I say that as an MRA. Honestly, thanks for the laughs, guy. You're only proving that literally no one will take you seriously. So counterintuitive to what you're trying to accomplish.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:41 PM
0

Look at my comments. I regularly pulled up that 70% figure. But you won't because you won't admit that you're wrong. So stubborn and thick skulled.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:39 PM
0

According to the study. I literally never disputed that, lmao. It was in my original comment. Other studies may or may not agree with that figure.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:31 PM
1

Did you? Because you seem to have come to some concrete conclusion based on them. I would assume you read and analyzed all those studies to get to your current understanding of the world.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:27 PM
1

Tell me why I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:25 PM
1

You (and many others in this sub) claim that women are more violent than men, yet there are some studies that conclude the opposite (even ones that are cited in this fucking thread!). You can't use one single study to characterize the world. This one singular study was done on a specific cohort of people, analyzed in a specific way, and made it's own conclusions. If you really cared about truth, you'd do a meta study on all studies about domestic violence. Then you might be able to accurately ta…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:19 PM
0

I literally stated that in the first comment in this thread. Did you miss it?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 06:13 PM
1

You really have your panties in a bunch about this, huh? What is it that you think I disagree with you?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 05:49 PM
1

Wrong about?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 05:48 PM
1

A conclusion isn't the same as truth. It's a synthesis and interpretation of data. whatever else you might also have had in mind. What do you think that is?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 05:48 PM
1

Literally the first few studies in that list conclude that men are more violent than women.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 05:12 PM
1

Ah yes, the conclusion of the study that literally said: One possible explanation for this, assuming that men and women are equally likely to initiate physical violence, is that men, who are typically larger and stronger, are less likely to retaliate if struck first by their partner. Thus, some men may be following the norm that “men shouldn’t hit women” when struck first by their partner. A different explanation is that men are simply less willing to report hitting their partner than are women.…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 05:11 PM
1

No, because I never disputed that fact. Are you just arguing because you want to? "Seem" as in "the studies literally concluded the opposite of what you claim"
/r/MensRights06/04/21 05:07 PM
1

You're just rolling at this point. Conveniently glossing over my other points because you have no rebuttal to them.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 05:05 PM
0

35% of the total OF 24% of relationships that are violent, which = 8.4% of the total. sorry math is hard for you. Besides, it's funny that you guys keep using this one study to "prove" that women are more violent than men, despite the study itself literally saying that there is likely a huge underreporting of men being violent, much like in the police study of DV. 40% is the low end estimate. And men inflict more bodily harm. Oh, and let's also just ignore the fact that there's people in this ve…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 04:05 PM
0

Women initiate 70% of reciprocal DV It literally says in the beginning of the paper: In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases Stop lying. Out of 24% of all relationships, 50% of those are reciprocally violent (~12% of all relationships), and 70% of the time, women were the instigators, which indicates ~8.4% of all relationships have female perpetrators. The entire point of the paper is addresing the rate of injury due to reciprocal viole…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 02:24 PM
1

So, you personally went through each and every one of those studies to form your conclusion?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 02:10 PM
1

Well done on 'interpreting' that HARD data incorrectly. 😐 Explain? The study says that out of all the couples identified, around 24% of them include violence, and of those 24%, women seem to instigate violence 70% of the time, but are much less likely to inflict bodily harm tham men are.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 02:08 PM
1

would you agree that men are much more likely to not report it if they were the victim? I'm not sure whether it's men or women that are less likely to report. What data makes you conclude that you think men are more victimized? Just skimming through the papers you listed for me, the first few seem to contradict your perspective.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 02:05 PM
1

What list?
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:28 PM
-1

Ah yes. I remember that study. From 2007. People in this very thread incorrectly claim that women initiate DV 70% of the time, but as you stated, someone who probably actually looked at the data, that it's only 70% of 50% of 24% of all couples, which is ~8.4% of all couples with a female perpetrator. Men are also much more likely to inflict bodily harm, and less likely to reciprocate violence (probably for fear of legal issues or cultural values). The paper itself states: A different explanation…
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:05 PM
1

This is what I see Are there any references on that article? Can you link them here so I can look at them?
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:46 PM
-1

Because I'd like to see the data for myself instead of someone's interpretation of it, which may or may not be correct. If you've got a source, I'd be more than happy to read it.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:36 PM
1

"To continue reading this article, you must log in." I'm guessing you haven't read this one either?
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:35 PM
0

I asked for sources, not videos of people talking about the source. How much you wanna bet you've never read any of them? Show me primary sources and I will read them. The video you linked doesn't even list their sources in the description.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:28 PM
-5

Can you actually link some data instead of an hour long video of some guy rambling? I want numbers, graphs, HARD data. I want to see the data myself, not secondhand. Lmao, imagine downvoting someone for wanting to see a primary source.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:17 PM
0

Oh trust me, there's plenty of young'ns that believe in that stuff. Sure, as they get older, they might tend toward the "shit ain't like it used to be" and "[insert thing] is ruining society" mentality, but many kids as young as like 13 definitely soak up that propaganda. Most of it is just reactionary anger and confusion towards things they misinterpret like scientific data or simply buzzwords (I mean who thought it was a good idea to call it toxic masculinity anyways?). It' snot like they're m…
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:01 PM
-2

They don't see it that way, though. To them, it's this super obvious truth that people need to wake up about. Western civilization is falling because of rap music and twerking. Men and women need to conform to traditional gender roles or else society will literally collapse. Get off my lawn! lights cig
/r/MensRights05/04/21 07:44 PM
-4

This, due to research, has now been proven false. Care to cite any sources?
/r/MensRights05/04/21 07:35 PM
3

You'll get crucified in this sub for being reasonable. There's no way a single instance of a group of surviors represents an entire gender. Most people here will default to that one TV game show that "proves" that men always work together without considering the complexities of society as a whole (or the fact that game shows select people based on certain criteria).
/r/MensRights05/04/21 07:34 PM
1

Not until there are actual consequences.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 04:13 PM
2

I've been banned there for "trolling". Those mods are pretty insane sometimes.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 02:45 PM
3

I wondered the same thing because I was given a choice when my parents split. I chose my mother because I was young and was probably just going off of instinct, but my mother ended up being very abusive to me. My father was a very reasonable parent, but he turned out to be extremely racist and got hooked on crazy conspiracy theories. He wasn't in my life much at all after the split. It's hard to imagine what my life would have been like if I had chosen to live with my dad when my parents split u…
/r/MensRights01/09/20 02:44 PM
6

It wasn’t “cheating”, it was a “spiritual entanglement”! /s
/r/MensRights31/08/20 04:31 PM
3

You're not smart by using l33t5p34k. Bots are designed to read through common substitutions.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 10:03 PM
122

Then shot himself when he couldn't get help.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 09:37 PM
2

I feel like I should expand on my last comment. You need to realize that some things just aren't going to change until some people die of old age. It's a common saying in science that "science advances one funeral at a time".
/r/MensRights25/08/20 08:04 PM
3

It's not defeatest. That would be just giving up.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 03:41 AM
6

Fear of legal action is greater than physical injury.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 08:15 PM
3

Time. Things usually take generations to change. Just plant the tree and accept that you'll never live to sit under it's shade.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 08:14 PM
61

Many women have resorted to just saying “men are trash” instead of “all men are trash” so they can backpedal and say “I dIDn’T sAy aLL mEN”
/r/MensRights21/08/20 03:43 PM
33

Even if the intention was bad, I still think it fits in this sub. Men are expected to be on the hook for things like this, by law.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 12:54 AM
7

Well that's fucking stupid to mutilate a baby boy's penis because your inner voices told you to.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 12:42 AM
1

They should definitely keep it that way. I'd probably die of laughter if I ever visited Australia and the first thing I saw when I turned a tv on was two neighbors fighting over who's dog pooed on the other's.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 11:52 PM
3

Yeah, Johnny's reputation went up in most places. Amber's went up with Karens and rad-fems.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 11:50 PM
2

looks like she has a lot of problems herself. In the clip of them apologising to the Australian government, Amber says "I am truly sorry", not "we're truly sorry". It was always about her, never "them".
/r/MensRights03/08/20 11:48 PM
1

They pixelate the poop, but not the gross liquid poop..... Some weird-ass censorship
/r/MensRights03/08/20 11:32 PM
8

I have been told multiple times by feminists that the phrase "men are trash" doesn't mean "all men", yet the phrase "women are whores" applies to all women. Like wtf?
/r/MensRights23/07/20 06:45 AM
1

That's why you're spending all this time replying to me? hmm...
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:59 PM
1

I have a browser extension that summarizes people's post history. I wouldn't spend that much time on you, lol.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:51 PM
1

Lol, have nothing to say, do you?
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:42 PM
1

Said the guy that sucks ice's dick, lol. Haha fuicking yikes, bro. 184 posts on that sub. You really are pathetic.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:31 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:29 PM
3

Lol, do you think you're upsetting me? I bet you secretly get turned on by traps.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:27 PM
1

At least you admit you need help.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:27 PM
1

blah blah blah
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:26 PM
2

Take your meds.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:23 PM
3

No, you being delusional and desperate for attention makes you pathetic.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 09:22 PM
3

I love how you’re so stupid that you’re getting downvoted in /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights18/07/20 07:12 PM
3

Ah hahahaha. Dude you’re so pathetic.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 07:11 PM
3

Dude, I wanna get given flowers
/r/MensRights18/07/20 07:10 PM
25

Lots of us hope she does, but we're realists, not blind optimists.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 01:17 AM
2

Just be aware, RT is a known Russian propadanga source.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 01:28 PM
2

And how did that work out for everyone?
/r/MensRights06/07/20 03:22 PM
2

And why does that matter?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 10:08 PM
5

You mean the whole clip?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 10:07 PM
6

It's funny and sad because it's true.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 07:11 PM
17

Lots of women go bonkers when they realize that they can't get what they want sexually.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:39 PM
17

They'd probably get creeped out and think you're hitting on them.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:37 PM
2

It's disgusting that this is even a show.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 06:11 PM
3

I thought they were called “survivors” 👀
/r/MensRights27/06/20 05:43 AM
2

Well that’s not 100% right. Men definitely compete against other men all the time.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 04:55 AM
3

Theoretically, can’t both exist? The sheer number of men competing to get to the top creates the hierarchy, and the men that don’t make it are disposed.
/r/MensRights26/06/20 07:50 PM
13

Because people don’t think men should have the right to their own bodies.
/r/MensRights26/06/20 07:49 PM
2

because I don’t trust him enough to clean well myself to teach him how to wash his body properly FTFY
/r/MensRights19/06/20 10:23 PM
4

Yeah, do people cut off their ears because they are too fucking stupid and lazy to wash behind their ears? It's insane!
/r/MensRights19/06/20 10:22 PM
8

Consent only ever mattered in context of women. Drunk girls can't consent to sex, but drunk guys can, aparently.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 10:21 PM
2

They still don't get it.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 10:10 PM
4

Statuatory rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/20 08:10 PM
-11

I don't think 15 is pedophilia, is it? Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/20 08:10 PM
1

It won't come up on google searches, but if you search circumcision on twitter or facebook, or if you go to 4chan or any part of the weird porn subreddits you might see what I mean. There's a huge propaganda campaign to make men with circumsizsed penises feel inferior to other uncircumsized men. It's heavily tied to the campaigns that are trying to get white men to feel inferior to black men in terms of penis size. All of this leads to toxic masculinity. Sorry if this seems really stupid, but I …
/r/MensRights17/06/20 12:32 AM
1

Okay, just gloss over my last sentence.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 12:13 AM
0

And forcibly removing part of a man's body that can result in toxic masculinity doesn't hurt women? Have you seen the propaganda campaigns on circumcision?
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:55 PM
1

Feminists seem to talk a great deal of toxic masculinity, no?
/r/MensRights16/06/20 07:15 PM
4

Female circumcision is. FGM is done to control women's sexuality. MGM is and was also done to control men's sexuality. It was believed that MGM would prevent boys from masturbating. Ultimately, it affects everyone in the process.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 05:55 PM
4

Uhh, yea they do. Feminism's main goal is equality for everyone, despite their organization's name stating the contrary.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 05:48 PM
12

Exactly. Because men are disposable and forgettable.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:54 PM
9

I believe you, but that hasn’t been my experience with every feminist I encounter.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 03:10 AM
1

Maybe you should expand your social group and see for yourself. I personally have encountered many feminists that either take no stance on MGM or slightly support it.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:51 AM
-3

When you search for something on the internet, you’ll probably find it. That’s selection bias. When you’ve lived on the internet, and lived long enough in the real world, you realize that circumcision is still an extremely controversial topic, even among feminists.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:42 AM
3

You keep editing your post. You said you unsubbed because people had a strong reaction to your insensitive comment.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:40 AM
6

It's ususally women on the fence about it saying things like "well I heard there's benefits to it, and I don't have a penis, so I wouldn't know. I'll just leave the decision up to the father who wants our son to be circumcised". I see that kind of post all over different websites all the time.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 11:48 PM
6

learn to read. Well if you knew how to, you wouldn't have needed to interject.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 11:32 PM
37

I'm not using "internet" and "mensrights reddit sub" synonymously.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 11:24 PM
5

Lol, when people disagree with you, you close your eyes and shout "lalalalala".
/r/MensRights15/06/20 11:17 PM
7

Are we talking about MGM or FGM? Because I've seen way more women talk about FGM, and hardly any about MGM. Many women I see actually support MGM.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 11:11 PM
8

The argument was "MGM and FGM are both bad". Then you chime in with your unfettered "wisdom" with "yeah but FGM is much worse!!" We know. Shut up.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 11:09 PM
11

It's actually a bad faith argument to downplay the effects of male circumcision. Brushing it off as if it doesn't matter just because you heard someone say "FGM is worse tham MGM and it's a bad faith argument".
/r/MensRights15/06/20 10:51 PM
3

I've been on the internet probably longer than you have been alive.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 10:49 PM
3

The number of people downvoting you disproves that civil discourse exists.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 10:48 PM
10

Literally all you have to do is use soap and water. It's just like washing the back of your ears. Or washing a labia.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 10:45 PM
5

If you read the AAP website carefully, they only really recommend circumcision in areas of the world with low sanitation standards, like Africa.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:36 PM
6

Christians and Atheists that don't realize why circumcision became popular in America.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:35 PM
10

Good thing I threw religion away long ago. It's not necessary.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:35 PM
37

Consent only works in context of women.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:34 PM
28

Why do you support forced male genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:34 PM
16

I think you're fucking retarded, but that's just my opinion.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:33 PM
139

Don't see a whole lot of them on the internet.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:32 PM
4

Yeah, this isn't something that was designed by humans. It's literally a part of our biology.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 03:26 PM
4

That's certainly what this is implying.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 07:26 PM
4

Something something self-fulfilling prophecy.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 03:12 PM
42

They'll get off in 3 days on good behavior.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 02:49 PM
2

Yeah, it is common, but it's also common to call people incels.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 08:18 AM
10

"Women are the primary victims of covid!"
/r/MensRights25/05/20 05:00 AM
7

Yeah, even if you do believe someone to be an incel, it's not like calling them that is helping anything. "Hey, look at those people that are depressed and socially isolating themselves. Let's make fun of them!"
/r/MensRights25/05/20 02:08 AM
3

Those laws are only for men.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 03:06 AM
2

"Stupid-ass bitch" Wiser words have never been said.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 03:05 AM
2

Wooden spoon.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/20 06:10 PM
3

Ha, joke's on you. My mom's asian and she abused me!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/20 04:59 PM
1

Where's kantbot when you need him?
/r/MensRights14/05/20 06:04 AM
3

Women have all the rights in the world when it comes to their body Well, it depends on the state...
/r/MensRights14/05/20 06:04 AM
1

Well, it's kind of a pro and a con, eh?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 09:54 PM
0

It was kind of a joke, but okay man.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 08:12 PM
26

Pros: don't have to worry about getting robbed no stds don't even have to leave the house Cons: no physical contact
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/20 08:03 PM
6

I keep hearing that feminists are fighitng for everyone's rights.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 06:15 PM
1

That's really sad and fucked up, but at least the hotline is available...
/r/MensRights23/04/20 04:57 AM
1

I'm curious what they specifically talk about. How does it differ from the information you get about assault against women?
/r/MensRights23/04/20 03:59 AM
1

Lol, okay, just gloss over my entire argument.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 08:20 PM
1

Imagine feeling superior for making more money than other people. What about the teachers that hardly get paid, but are literally essential to our society? What about the medical researchers that hardly get paid, but are also curcial to a functioning society? Also, imagine feeling superior to other people for wanting to further their education. Well played, you fell for the classist meme.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 05:50 PM
1

Yeah, the one where you refuse to try to see why someone would want to teach you something? Where you build a strawman for your teachers and assume it's for another purpose? And what did you get out of it? Freezing your mental maturity state to that of when you were a kid in middle school with no life experience. I 'member that comment.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:01 AM
1

Oh, I did add to the conversation. You're just too obtuse to see it. You think that your stupidity makes you special. It doesn't. It's so ironic because you literally don't even know what you don't know.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 09:28 PM
1

I have a wide range of friends. I'm just comparing you to my stupid ones because you remind me of them :)
/r/MensRights21/04/20 08:08 PM
1

No offense, but you sound like all my stupid friends.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 05:25 PM
1

It's literally the opposite, lol.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 08:29 PM
1

You obviously didn't learn much in school if that's what you took from it.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 08:29 PM
1

You're not saying men have it worse. You're just saying men also have it bad in some cases.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 08:28 PM
3

Yep. Lots of new mothers use the excuse "I just think it looks better that way". Like bitch, you'd prefer a natural penis if everyone didn't fucking do it! In a way, it reminds me of the Spanish Inquisition. "We've always been Catholic". Bitch, no you haven't.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:37 AM
5

They did. Decades ago when John Kellogg was preaching about it. Now, that belief has gone out of popularity. People just do it now because "his father was" and "that's the way we've always done it". It's very ironic.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:34 AM
13

It was popularized in the US because people believed it would prevent boys from masturbating.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:13 AM
6

Wow, it only took how many decades, a recession, and a fuckiing pandemic?
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:57 AM
1

Most court systems would rule in favor of the woman. It's a fucking miracle that Amber suffered any consequencs at all. One of the reasons why it turned out this way is because this is a really high profile case. The American court system is very sexist. On average, women get lesser sentences (if at all) for the same crimes as a man would commit.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/20 03:11 AM
2

Amber made a false rape accusation against Johnny Depp. She also physically abused him and admitted to it in a secret audio recording.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/20 06:50 PM
2

I'm failing to connect what you're saying with the OP.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 11:23 PM
2

What is, exactly?
/r/MensRights31/03/20 03:17 AM
37

I don't think it discounts feminism entirely, just the more aggressive forms of it that say men don't face issues in society and that all society's problems are caused by men and the patriarchy. Of course women face issues that are specific to them, and we need to fix those issues, but it's very clear that men are being left in the dust when it comes to issues men face. Many prominent feminist activists completely ignore men's issues, and they're very snobby about it.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 03:08 AM
3

I'm sorry, but was I clumping all boys in one group?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 06:31 PM
1

A lot of it comes from sexual repression. It's not just all the guy's fault. When I was in grade school, I had a tendency to think and act that way, too. I was raised in a very religious Christian household, so that perverted my view on relationships and sex. Also, there's a very common belief that circumcision prevents boys from masturbating. Boys are repressed in ways that are both similar and different to how girls are.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 06:31 PM
35

Do you not know what sarcasm is?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 12:20 AM
6

Yes, it is a problem.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 11:37 PM
-9

"Nice"
/r/MensRights24/03/20 09:31 PM
66

It's a joke, dumbass.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 09:31 PM
10

To be fair, there are a lot of guys that put that pussy on the pedestal.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 09:25 PM
13

Someone said it might be a local hotline number, so flooding it with calls would only be bad.
/r/MensRights20/03/20 08:04 PM
3

Yeah, and she's also hot.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 03:46 PM
1

We still have a while to go until the rights of everyone is taken into consideration.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 03:37 PM
9

And just like why we have laws distinguishing between murder and attempted murder because otheriwse criminals would be motivated to "finish the job", what's stopping anyone from doing the same with a false sexual assault allegation?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/20 08:33 PM
2

I guess you could very loosely translate that to "lol". "sorry ur dog died lol"
/r/MensRights11/03/20 06:19 PM
8

Holy shit that website is fucking cancer.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 06:16 PM
6

Do women not realize that false rape accusations hurt women, too? They make real accusations less believable. And what's stopping the falsely accused from actually doing it?
/r/MensRights11/03/20 06:15 PM
3

Yeah, and my comment was sarcasm. Happy International Men's Day, btw!
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:17 PM
30

I was told that every other day is international men's day, so "not today, women! It's international men's day today!"
/r/MensRights09/03/20 08:11 PM
0

Idk man, I see a large amount of men's height jokes said by both men and women.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:51 PM
6

And gay women. The studies aren't very conclusive, but some say that domestic violence in lesbian relationships is significantly higher than gay relationships or straight ones. Other studies say it's about the same as heterosexual relationships. Either way, they have to recognize that women can be and are the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:10 PM
4

That's because when it happens to young boys, everyone just goes "niiiice".
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:03 PM
1

"We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas!"
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:02 PM
2

Pedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent kids. Technically she's a child-rapist and an ephebophile.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:01 PM
2

The distinction between the real definition of decimation doesn't matter as much as the distinctions between child-rapist, pedophile, and ephebophile. There are real-world consequences to mixing up the latter.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:00 PM
8

To add, a person can be a pedophile and/or an ephebophile and not be a child-rapist.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 08:58 PM
8

She's a child-rapist and an ephebophile, not a pedophile.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 08:55 PM
8

Are you telling me that we shouldn't be comparing your average joe with billionaires? Get out of here with your logic.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:42 PM
44

MENS rea? That's patriarchy!!!!
/r/MensRights27/02/20 03:53 PM
10

I'm a single guy that spends time cleaning my apartment. Where's my check?
/r/MensRights26/02/20 03:56 PM
1

Yes of course these are still problems. I'm not ignoring them, in fact if you poke through my comment history, you might see me bringing them up. All I'm saying is that it's not a competition on who has it worse. Men and women face different challenges. challenges men face may be more ignored for many reasons, but that doesn't invalidate the myriad of problems women face, even in developed countries.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 04:02 PM
1

That was my point.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 03:38 PM
1

Okay, so if we compile a list of problems that men and women face, which side do you think would have more problems?
/r/MensRights25/02/20 03:36 PM
0

Okay, so there's 3 things. What else?
/r/MensRights24/02/20 09:56 PM
1

You seem to misunderstand which person I'm supporting.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 07:37 PM
9

It's called having a monkey brain.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 07:34 PM
1

I do because those are the people who's minds might be changed by seeing how stupid some other people sound.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 07:32 PM
0

Anything else?
/r/MensRights24/02/20 05:41 PM
1

He’s probably never even heard of a book.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 05:41 PM
0

Have a source for that?
/r/MensRights24/02/20 05:40 PM
-3

Imagine not realizing there could potentially be millions of lurkers.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 05:38 PM
10

Yea, the article is meant to highlight that women are often the victim of partner abuse, but the author could have at least addressed the fact that men are still more than 60% likely to be killed by a friend or stranger. Completely glosses over that, and with an article so short, it could have used a bit more substance and analysis. Not even a bit of a mention about male victims. To me, that has to be intentional. but no, let's just put this huge picture of a person in the middle of the article …
/r/MensRights21/02/20 09:15 PM
13

Why do women deserve recognition for something that effects men more, especially since there have been hundreds of the same article written? I've never seen an article from the BBC honestly talking about domestic violence in the context of men being the victim.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 08:01 PM
1

Well, it's gone now.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 04:13 PM
1

Man you really are going to die on this hill, aren't you? Men also have special powers that women don't have. Does that make them the most privileged? No. Find examples of male privilege and female privilege and compare the two. Ther'll be a discrepancy.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:37 PM
0

To say that Lashanda is on par with Jeff Bezos is delusional. And besides, I answered your question perfectly fine. You're just looking for an answer that agrees with your pre-concieved beliefs - that women are the most privileged out of anyone. Fact is that if you aren't super rich, you have just about as much privilege as anyone else.. unless you're a minority.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:32 PM
2

The easy (and wrong) answer would be to say that white men have it the best. I'd have to say anyone born into ludicrious wealth, regardless of race or sex, but often super rich white men have it the best.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:20 PM
1

Not sure what your point is. He didn't mention anything about America.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:16 PM
0

No I'm not. i'm literally just pointing out why they aren't the most privileged, as you claim.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:13 PM
2

That mentality is creeping into other cultures. I feel like that's my life lmao.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 08:02 PM
0

You're saying women are more privileged. That literally implies men have it worse.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 08:00 PM
2

I'm not saying it doesn't happen against men. I'm just highlighting the negatives women are born and live with. You said it doesn't and you can't deny that what I've posted is true. It's not a fucking pissing contest, by the way. "zomg men have it so much worse than women" just makes MRA look stupid as fuck even though I support men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 07:49 PM
0

big yikes my dude
/r/MensRights19/02/20 07:43 PM
-2

Well besides being physically weaker, there are many. What about the obvious sexism that they still face? Female doctors are often considered as simply nurses by patients, and even the medical staff. I wonder how many rape kits have gone missing or forgotten. Tens, if not hundreds of thousands by now. Or the fact that women are literally murdered for speaking out against sexual assault or simply turning down guys. Or the fact that doctors don't believe women when they say they are in pain, and a…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 06:54 PM
7

I feel the same way.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 05:46 PM
4

You do know that the first incel was a woman, right?
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:35 PM
2

How in any way is that sexist? Can't women be incels?
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:57 PM
4

No, it's a mix of /r/menwritingwomen, /r/hentai, and /r/incels
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:53 PM
35

Japan is in a crisis because too many japanese men are working themselves to death, then get home and watch amine for 5 hours. Japanese men are weird as fuck, man. At least in my experience.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:52 PM
1

Shut up, you're ruining my confirmation bias!
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:51 PM
0

At least 50% of the people in this sub do, and it's hilarious.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:50 PM
-3

And then have kids, wait till they're slightly past their teen years, then cheat on their wives with hotter, younger white women. We all know this song and dance.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:49 PM
46

I guarantee it was written by a neckbeard weeb.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:48 PM
2

Just because they have the ability in some cases to do that doesn't mean that their entire class is OP. They have lots of weaknesses as well that puts them overall in a less privileged class than many other people.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:46 PM
6

Wow, literally a screenshot of a fucking youtube comment that's completely unverifiable.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:45 PM
1

No, I'm genuinely asking.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:14 PM
1

What does the post have anything to do with toxic masculinity? Am I missing something here?
/r/MensRights18/02/20 10:47 PM
-1

Exactly. I was like wtf? This has nothing to do with the title lmao.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 10:10 PM
2

And then everyone clapped.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 10:10 PM
-3

Just some stupid boomer from facebook posting a meme here thinking he's edgy.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 10:09 PM
-9

Go back to facebook
/r/MensRights18/02/20 10:09 PM
10

Actually, no. Not every child molester is a pedophile. Lots of research done on child molestors shows that some people are just sociopathic or mentally retarded and show no evidence of actual sexual attraction to minors.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/20 08:31 PM
9

A pedophile is a person that's attracted to pre-pubescent children. Also, there's a big difference between a pedophile and a child molester.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/20 07:31 PM
2

did you forget to take your meds today?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 04:12 PM
153

Yes.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 04:03 PM
-19

That's like saying Hitler made the first animal rights abuse laws, so that means he's a good person. Wow, Trump did one good thing that everyone wanted as a non-partisian aggreement in order to make himself look good for a few minutes.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 04:01 PM
2

As if her acting skills makes me want to see her in theatres.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/20 03:51 PM
3

It's a highly contaigous form of a bacterial infection, commonly known for infecting people in hospitals. It's resistant to traditional antibiotics, so you need powerful drugs to cure it.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 10:10 PM
10

Because Men are stronger than women, so women can never be the aggressor Wait, shit did I just say men are stronger than women? I mean that #bossbabe #yassqueen #girlpower #women are much stronger than men in every way.... except when it comes to domestic violence, then: Men are stronger than women, so women can never be the aggressor. Except women are obviously the stronger sex becuase #feminism!
/r/MensRights04/02/20 10:09 PM
1

I have a solution. Just have every non-rapist and non-murderer wear a sign around their neck saying "I promise I'm not a rapist and murderer".
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:33 PM
15

One of the most common arguments today for circumcision is that "it just looks better". Well, then we should force labiaplasties on baby girls at birth to "make them look better". In fact, the foreskin serves a few purposes. It shields the glans of the penis (the head), which is the most sensitive part, from rubbing against the insides of their garments and desensitizing it. It also contains tens of thousand of sensitive nerve endings. It also provides natural lubrication for sex and masturbatio…
/r/MensRights23/01/20 03:51 PM
30

According to his fucked up logic, absolutely.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 03:46 PM
5

Never worked in an office environment with a lot of women before?
/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:54 PM
1

Their mods are literal nazis.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:06 PM
1

hashtag double standards
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/19 06:19 PM
16

Yea, now we can all drink peppermint schnapps and play grab ass!
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/19 06:47 PM
3

MGTOW in itself isn't a bad thing, but there certainly are MGTOWs that are bad and do bad things.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:54 PM
3

Are you slow or something?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:30 PM
-3

Toxic femininity is when people behave in ways that hurts women, contrary to toxic masculinity where people behave in ways that is hurtful to men. This isn't toxic feminity because it doesn't hurt women in any way. This is just straight up assault.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:13 PM
-10

How does this behavior hurt women?
/r/MensRights16/12/19 07:19 PM
2

Yep, so either way you're infringing on someone's rights. Gotta come to a compromise in that case.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 07:07 PM
2

In the case of rape, it only takes one participant.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:56 PM
1

That man’s that you’re forcing people to be parents against their will?
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:41 PM
1

What do you make of this quote? Self-reliance and emotional repression are correlated with increased psychological problems in men such as depression, increased stress, and substance abuse. Toxic masculine traits are characteristic of the unspoken code of behavior among men in American prisons, where they exist in part as a response to the harsh conditions of prison life. Other traditionally masculine traits such as devotion to work, pride in excelling at sports, and providing for one's family, …
/r/MensRights12/12/19 11:01 PM
1

Man you sound really confusing. It isn't a thing, but... it is a thing, just called different things? That's like saying there aren't such things as guns, but there are pistols and rifles. Aren't pistols and rifles all under the same term of "gun"? Why doesn't that work with toxic femininity?
/r/MensRights12/12/19 09:24 PM
1

So I'm really confused. What is the actual definition for toxic masculinity, then?
/r/MensRights12/12/19 08:50 PM
1

Male disposability is an attribute to toxic masculinity, sure. I couldn't tell what you were saying because you weren't being very clear. Your sentence reads many different ways depending on how you use the object modifier.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 08:34 PM
0

You can't define something by what it isn't. You still haven't provided me a definition.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 08:11 PM
0

You included "toxic femininity" in your definition of "toxic masculinity", or was "misdiagnosis" supposed to be the modifier for all the subjects in that sentence?
/r/MensRights12/12/19 05:46 PM
0

You're saying toxic femininity and toxic masculinity are the same thing?
/r/MensRights12/12/19 04:49 PM
1

So that begs the question. What is toxic masculinity, if toxic femininity is a thing?
/r/MensRights12/12/19 03:24 PM
0

I’ve personally have had conversations about toxic femininity and have seen many talking about, for example, how affirmative action has influenced companies to hire based on gender. You got to be kidding me that you haven’t seen people talk any those things in those subs. Either that or you aren’t looking well enough and just assume the deleted troll comments are the conversations you think are being censored. But funny you mention toxic femininity because that begs the question that toxic mascu…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:39 AM
-1

It isn't though. this website is an interactive map of the most popular subreddits I wish I would have screenshotted some searches I made a while back before a huge amount of subs got banned, but basically there were very high correlations between r/mensrights and the incel subreddits, womanhate subreddits, and conspiracy for some funny reason. You can explore it if you want, but since most of the hate subreddits are such small and recent communities, they won't show up on this map. It's because…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 11:25 PM
0

And this sub is very popular with woman hating subs. What's your point? Every post is either dead or littered with removed comments. Probably because they get brigaded by people like you.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 08:12 PM
-1

Better sub than this one tbh, at least there's actual discussion there rather than a bunch of dudes shouting obsecenities at women they hate and misinterpreting everything. This sub tends to self trigger also, so what's you point?
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:45 PM
0

Every time I've seen feminists attempt to discuss this they immediately shut the conversation down because saying men can be good implies women aren't good in that way I don't see that when I see people discussing toxic masculinity. Where are yo useeing these conversations? Mostly, it's just people like you that create that strawman, and then your words echo in the chamber, and other people read them thinking that's what feminists talk about. You realize it's phrased this way very deliberately? …
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:33 PM
2

Saying "masculinity is toxic" is labelling that so, but saying "toxic masculinity" is saying "the parts of masculinity that are toxic", which implies that there are good masculine traits. I agree that it's a bad phrase and is very commonly misinterpreted (like the phrase "I couldn't care less"), but you can't in good faith say what you've said knowing what it means. Anyone who agrees that toxic masculinity is a problem will be quick to point out good masculine traits. There's an entire wikipedia…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:14 PM
0

Toxic masculinity isn't saying that masculinity is inherently toxic I was relating it back to this statement that you rebutted. I was giving examples of toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:04 PM
8

English does, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 04:52 PM
2

But toxic masculinity isn't perpetrated only by men. Women tell men to "man up" all the time when they're facing hardships. Some women also don't believe that men can be raped. Some women also believe that men are pedophiles and shouldn't be around even their own children. Those ideas that men "should be" a certain way is what definies toxic masculinity. "Men should be only the provider and not caretaker of his children. That's a woman's job". "Men can't express their emotions, that's only for w…
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:27 PM
0

Give me one example of the definition changing. I've never heard of that.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:06 PM
2

Every time, people misunderstand what toxic masculinity is. We do this fucking rodeo like 3 times a day...
/r/MensRights11/12/19 03:51 PM
3

I've listened to a lot of old hip hop and they definitely are singling out the thuggish black people in the community. They aren't rapping that all black people are bad. Clearly you haven't listened to any 2pac.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 03:39 PM
1

Do you... know what the definition of toxic masculinity is?
/r/MensRights11/12/19 03:11 PM
4

Sure 0.000000000001% is still a chance.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/19 09:29 PM
0

I fully agree. I don't consider myself to be MRA for that particular reason.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 08:08 PM
3

I think a part of it isn't that men are whining about the boot thing or not having a google doodle for the sake of not having a google doodle, it's more about the fact that society tends to turn a blind eye to issues men encounter, which is reflected in the fact that most people didn't even know IMD was a thing. It's not really about "what about meeee", but rather "we matter, too, and we are trying to spread awareness by having a day dedicated to it". I don't think any of those guys (spare for t…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 04:49 PM
3

IMD isn't about hating on women... just go to twitter or facebook and look up the hashtag. The vast majority of comments are about bringing up problems that men encounter in society. That's what IMD is about, and saying that just because a group of actual incels and MRA assholes are using it to hate women makes that what IMD is about is just disingenuous. That's like saying that IWD is about hating men just because there's a group of radical feminists using it that way.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 03:59 PM
1

His argument wasn't that women didn't have it worse, it was a rebuttal to your claim that "[men have] been writing the rules and basically determining society for the entirety of history", which is factually incorrect in so many ways.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 03:49 PM
0

But it isn't really comparable because your foreskin isn't always showing as in the case of breasts. Even though the breasts can be covered, they are always present. The penis is generally covered and not visible for women.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:49 PM
2

Agreed with everything said, but breasts do have utility. It's to attract men (and I'm not saying bigger = better, there are different preferences men have for breast size which has been shown to be correlated with things such as their socioeconomic status).
/r/MensRights05/12/19 09:42 PM
2

I can say as a rebuttal that the labia has no function and must be removed for cleanliness.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:55 PM
5

He's not comparing, he's calling out the double standard. And yes, it was 100% satirical, get over yourself. The "you know because cleanliness" part was the obvious give away.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:45 PM
5

Yes, circumcision makes men feel like less of men. There's tens of thousands of sensitive nerve endings in the foreskin that's completely lost when cut off. Also, it makes masturbating harder because you need more lubrication. Uncircumcised men don't really need lube to masturbate. It's also the cause of desensitization in the head of the penis because the foreskin is ususally acting as a physical barrier. Also, phimosis only occurs in ~1% of men.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:35 PM
1

That’s the “fun” in the game.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 07:49 PM
1

I wonder if anyone has actually read the 50 page report, and has medical knowledge to properly comment on it. The NHS claims that these interventions are unnecessary, like how getting a full MRI for a simple cold would be wildly unnecessary. I don’t quite see how this is supposed to pit men and women against each other besides a bunch of people misinterpreting the data.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 07:19 PM
1

What does prostate cancer have to do with the globalist boogeyman?
/r/MensRights30/11/19 07:08 PM
0

You’re the one who made this about muh globalists. What does this have anything to do with “globalism”? It only effects one country.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 06:43 PM
-4

Do you think it’s not possible to be greedy without being a “globalist”?
/r/MensRights30/11/19 06:32 PM
-7

That’s not globalism, that’s just called greed.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 06:12 PM
-14

The fuck does this have to do with muh globalism boogeyman?
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter