TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hamdizzle Archive

View 5 posts and 46 comments by Hamdizzle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Considering I was banned immediately for making a joke that the moderators didn't approve of, against the rules of the moderation policy, especially considering I've been registered for a year and used to post here at r/mr, I would hazard a guess that frivolous bannings and censorship are common here. You probably just never hear about it. Meanwhile obvious feminist trolls remain, trolling away, referring to MRAs as bigots. Back to my new account... since it's clear this one will be banned again…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:20 AM
1

Warren Farrell is not a feminist. If you really have to ask the question "is feminism productive" all you have to do is look at the world around you. Where has feminism gotten us?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 07:14 AM
1

So I'm "wrong" but you can't refute a single point I raise. Concession of defeat accepted.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 07:03 AM
-5

So I'm "wrong" but you can't refute a single point I raise. Concession of defeat accepted.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:11 AM
1

So I'm "wrong" but you can't refute a single point I raise. Concession of defeat accepted.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:00 AM
3

War deaths.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 09:03 PM
-3

So I'm "wrong" but you can't refute a single point I raise. Concession of defeat accepted.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:58 PM
0

Well here's hoping it happens within the next five, because I don't think I can take sitting around and waiting for 20 years before I take action. It's not in my nature to turtle or run away.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 07:02 PM
-5

Back when "right to vote, own property, get a job and be safe from rape" were issues women faced They weren't really issues women faced. Women COULD own property and vote (they just chose not to make the effort to earn their own land, and it wasn't necessary because they got married to men who owned property and could vote), they COULD get a job, and women COULD be quite safe from rape as long as they didn't do foolish things.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:59 PM
0

You don't think the economic collapse will take place sooner than 5 decades? Nations are going broke around the world and states in the US are as well. I was kind of looking forward to a collapse or at least depression within the next year to help get us back to something more sensible, a world where feminism cannot exist.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:50 PM
1

Wishful thinking, it won't happen. Demonspawn's outlook is more realistic. Also there is nothing good about feminism.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:47 PM
1

That might make more sense. Either way he's still referring to censorship of views by "obliterating" the opposition rather than hearing them out. I will update the quote.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:43 PM
-2

Correct, I edited it to be more constructive. No need to apologize, words on Reddit can't hurt me. :)
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:41 PM
-1

To me all dialogue is positive.... I think you should listen, if somebody has the opposite feeling from me I want to hear it so I can add to mine. I don't want to oblitherate [sic] theirs with (mine?).
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:36 PM
-2

Well we can ask ourselves who it is usually doing the censorship that Louis CK refers to. I assert it is overwhelmingly liberals, of which feminists are a component. And I have noticed that liberals, more than conservatives, tend to agree with Louis CK on this matter, that they'd rather hear views than outright censor them. So yes, it does appear to be a political issue, whether you like it or not. Political correctness is a liberal phenomenon, it is exactly what Louis is talking about, so yes, …
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:28 PM
-1

I didn't say you did. But I suppose you're right that you're not telling me what I'm allowed to comment on, you're just claiming my views are irrelevant. I don't see why you feel the need to make such a statement, when the irrelevance of my views, if they are in fact irrelevant, should speak for itself. The end goal of your comment seems to be to encourage others to dismiss my views. Your time would be better spent sharing your own views than attacking mine without backing it up. Which is exactl…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:22 PM
-4

Again, no counter-argument, just personal attacks.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:22 PM
-7

Never said that. And do you recall who began the personal attacks, and continues them still? You. You are fucking stupid. You're too stupid to argue with. I don't report you because I'm man enough to handle my own problems.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:21 PM
-2

It is of course relevant, as it's related to a statement he made in the video. Why do you feel the need to complain, and tell me what I'm not allowed to comment on?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:19 PM
-9

Sexist? Sure, the sexes are different. Men and women are not the same, and these are facts. You don't understand that most women are seeking the same small number of "alpha" men? Next you'll tell me that there aren't any women out there who would have sex with Ryan Gosling given the chance.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:17 PM
-2

I have heard that precum doesn't' contain any substantial amount of sperm, but other than that, nope. I would advise against going bareback with random bar sluts in the future though, unless you want babies. If it turns out she's preggers, you could always try to intentionally impregnate as many girls as possible, which would at least spread your DNA far and wide. At that point you're screwed anyway. It's definitely a better alternative than being tied down to one bar slut your whole life. Ghett…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:50 PM
-1

He says he likes to hear other views so he can add that information to his own views. On the other hand, feminists and liberals prefer to censor alternate views (edit: and down-votes it seems). I agree with him. Edit, here is the quote I am referring to: To me all dialogue is positive.... I think you should listen, if somebody has the opposite feeling from me I want to hear it so I can add to mine. I don't want to oblitherate [sic] theirs with (mine?). Note: I removed the reference to censorship…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:46 PM
-8

And somehow that doesn't apply to men who take women home from bars willy-nilly? Look, idiot, I didn't say anything about men and diseases, but if you must know... a woman's vagina is a mucous membrane far more susceptible to disease than a male's penis which is covered in skin. Also given the nature of female attraction, it's 80% of women having sex with 20% of males, which means disease is concentrated in many women and a few males. Could the OP be a 20% manwhore who has sex with plenty of slu…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:36 PM
0

Well from my experience the first pulse, if you're trying not to go in her, is small and doesn't even feel like it has sperm in it, like it's almost entirely prostate fluid / precum. Unless you felt like you shot an actual load in her.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:31 PM
-2

Nah, you can tell if there's a pulse afterwards usually. Just pull out a little earlier and finish jerking off if it worries you. There are only a few days in a month when a girl can even get pregnant, and it's quite unlikely she'll get pregnant from a couple drops of prostate fluid with a tiny bit of semen in it that barely dripped into her vagina. I wouldn't be worried about getting her pregnant if I were you, I'd be more worried about her getting pregnant from some other dude and trying to cl…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:06 PM
-9

The pull out method works fine as long as you get out before you splooge. The other problem is that if you already came twice, there's still residual semen in your tubes that will get dumped out as soon as you have sex. Taking a piss afterward helps to clear your tubes out but I don't think it always gets it ALL out. I also don't suggest having bareback sex unless you know the girl well because most girls these days are quite diseased. Anyway, the chance you got that girl pregnant are extremely …
/r/MensRights17/07/12 04:56 PM
0

gay men you mean
/r/MensRights12/12/11 09:26 PM
-3

Kinda gay. Also He lives in a single-parent household[18] and now resides in Valrico, Tampa, Florida with his mother Laurie and sister Kelley.[23][37] Bonner's mother is a real estate agent and investor. Yay single moms, giving kids faggy haircuts and pushing dads out of their lives. This has little if anything to do with men's rights. Down-voted.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 09:21 PM
2

sad
/r/MensRights26/02/11 01:02 AM
2

I would suggest including any citations directly in the text, but be concise.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 11:38 PM
2

Good stuff, I'll send you some suggested edits.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 10:16 PM
-1

Men make more because they work more and they work harder and longer. For the same amount of work, women make more.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 10:09 PM
5

No, you can't fucking shoot someone who walks into your house because you are a woman and they are a man. Well, yes, you can.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:45 AM
1

Anecdotal evidence often has more truth to it than what is generally accepted by the population. Just look at all the bullshit statistics feminists have put out there that don't make any sense.
/r/MensRights19/02/11 02:06 AM
1

Good stuff.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 06:07 PM
3

Well, I'm not sure (based on your own assertions) that one who is just a "genius" and never had to work hard really "persevered", but I'll accept it. Still needed money to get in, silly. That meant merit-based scholarships and my own hard-earned money, on account of not having a vagina. If I'd had a vagina, I would have gotten paid to get my bachelor's. I would have gotten a free ride to graduate school, too. But, you see, I have a penis. I guess I should stop whining, huh?
/r/MensRights18/02/11 05:43 PM
2

Summary: natural male competitiveness does NOT translate to "undisciplined and irresponsible boys".
/r/MensRights18/02/11 05:38 PM
3

“Just as it seemed Aristotelian argumentative rhetoric was picking up steam, however, teachers began to find themselves facing classes of women. Such a rhetoric was dangerous, and it could be fed to women only in harm¬less bits and pieces, stripped of its popular uses. The situation of rhetorical instruction for women mirrored the attitude that women’s proper sphere was private, minimizing traditional agonistic oral forms and maximizing analysis and composition.” “A new sort of rhetorical instru…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 05:37 PM
3

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/01/27/should-men-tame-their-rhetoric/#comment-67272 Laura Grace Robins January 27, 2011 at 18:21 I have been working on a post,which I titled, “The Feminization of Rhetoric”. Since I don’t know when I will get around to finishing it and since it is timely here, I will post the quotes I am using from chapter 3 of this book: http://books.google.com/books?id=5SRDicjOYxkC&pg=PA1&dq=rhetoric+history&hl=en&ei=bCZCTYDsLoP6lweC-NXvDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 05:37 PM
2

I wasn't rich. I received no scholarships due to my penis, only due to my scholastic achievement. I received no internship because I had a penis, and two hot though not particularly bright women seem to have an advantage when being hired by men. I was supposed to believe that I was a potential rapist simply on account of my penis. Nevertheless, I graduated summa cum laude in engineering from U of M because I perservered, even though I faced plenty of misandry. Come on, man.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 05:30 PM
1

I didn't bust my ass, I am just a fucking genius. But I was discriminated against for being male. And I feel for other guys who were, because I'm just the type of person who cares about other people.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 05:17 PM
2

When you celebrate men standing up against institutionalized misandry, rather than spitting on them as you do everyone here, I'll give a shit what you think. Institutionalized misandry is well-proven. I've never stated that because men do worse, it follows that there is institutionalized misandry. I've stated that, as proven by a multitude of articles and books in the manosphere, misandry is institutionalized, especially in the education system, and that this has resulted in hardships for men an…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 05:12 PM
3

When you up-vote my original post rather than down-voting it to try to hide men's rights activism I'll listen to your misandry. Societal discrimination against males in education is not up for debate. It's been proven here time and again.
/r/MensRights18/02/11 05:07 PM
2

That, at least, is an interesting question. Is there a plight to men, and (if so) is it really institutional, or simply a difference in outcome? To wit, does the fact that men don't go to college (or drop out) reflect a reality that somewhere there is systematic discrimination, or just that men are being less responsible? Yes, yes, blame the menz. The reasons for males dropping out of the system are discussed here at reddit/mensrights all the time. When faced with institutional misandry, a stark…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:54 PM
2

df
/r/MensRights18/02/11 04:35 PM
1

Weaknesses of dictatorships Many of these stand out as quite applicable in our feminized system. Among the weaknesses of dictatorships are the following: The cooperation of a multitude of people, groups, and institutions needed to operate the system may be restricted or withdrawn. The requirements and effects of the regime’s past policies will somewhat limit its present ability to adopt and implement conflicting policies. The system may become routine in its operation, less able to adjust quickl…
/r/MensRights18/02/11 01:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter