TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hamilton_Brad Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by Hamilton_Brad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It’s an oversimplification but yes. In the other side, when you are talking about strangers, they don’t have to like you or interact with you, so being too heavy handed about it may just make you a Karen.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:52 PM
9

The reality is really harsh, for men and women. I have heard an abundance of stories from people who have had gastric bypass and had a significant body change- going from people completely ignoring you to getting what people consider normal niceties. This isn’t even with people in a dating scenario- just disregarded. I full believe it is completely unconscious in the people doing it as well
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 05:58 PM
1

No, I don’t think that’s true. In that pool of people, some have only had female intimate partners, and some have had both male and female and male partners. You can’t only remove the 13% of the pool that had abuse from a male partner. You would also have to remove the people from the pool who have dated both men and women but have not been abused. This would decrease the overall size of the pool. This would increase the amount who have been victims of abuse by women when represented as a percen…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:49 AM
1

If you are excluding lesbians because at least one intimate partner’s violence was from a male, doesn’t that mean you would also have to exclude other bisexual women who have not been the victim of IPV? (Since they have also had male intimate partners)? I would argue that the best answer your data supports is that the rate of IPV for lesbians who have not had a male intimate partner is somewhere between 30% and 43%?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:50 PM
9

The dating app business model is not really to help you find relationships (it means no longer needing them). It’s to almost find someone so that you are engaged enough to keep paying.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 11:38 AM
–

Hmm yes… house husband while boss girl makes the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 03:06 PM
4

The problems you describe only sound like they apply to a relationship. So one night stands are ok then? Tl;dr: sleep with younger girls but don’t date them because power imbalances can be problematic
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/23 01:59 PM
1

…but I did ask that question to you, specifically.. that would fit as it would be an example of they type of things that are considered high value. In a case like this question where there is no absolute answer with everyone being different, with a group of people all answering the question with their personal preferences will start to see some trends form that will show the types of characteristics that TYPICALLY are considered high value. Again, don’t answer if you don’t want to, but I can’t h…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 08:13 PM
1

Really? Isn’t that specifically what the OP asked for, making it the place? Plus, I would assume where are some things more important than others, deal breakers that could be summarized. Don’t get me wrong, if you don’t want to share that’s ok. You just make it sound like it would be inappropriate to share or silly to even ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 07:12 PM
5

…so what are the traits that you yourself value?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:08 PM
2

Ok, but what do you value now, yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 01:07 PM
3

The difference is how they perceive YOUR relationship with sex and sexuality. If in a casual setting sex is ok, but you suddenly withhold sex looking for a commitment, it can appear manipulative, controlling or a power move. Alternatively, it could be viewed as a “this is the way it’s don’t and should be done just because”, that would be its own red flag (you then appear rigid) Once you are looking for/ dealing with someone honestly looking for a relationship (especially 30+) they don’t want tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/23 04:15 AM
2

You can’t really be this dense can you? Yes, people should be with people compatible. People also grow and change, and their needs and wants change. That’s normal. The core of the question is if you are in a relationship and what you need is not compatible with some aspect of your partners life, are you supposed to straight up dump them right there on the spot, or explain how you feel and what you need to your partner, so they can make a decision about what they want to do. Is not expecting them…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 02:29 AM
1

I have been on Reddit a while now, and have seen many stupid, ignorant or just plain mean things. This comment is absolutely the most empty argument I have ever seen. If you have some problem with lingerie models sub out any job. The concept is that many times you may be ok with something at first, or think you will be ok with it, but that is different than living with something day in and day out. It’s ok that you decide later you aren’t ok with something. It’s ok to change your mind. If it hap…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 12:57 AM
0

But just because you are aware of something doesn’t mean that you really understand what it is like to live with it day in and day out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 04:58 PM
0

I did! Your point? The expectation that someone knows exactly what it entails changes the perspective of the rest of your post, even if what happens is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 03:03 PM
2

Yeah no one has ever been attracted to someone in a band, then had a problem with the reality of what it meant. The argument is that it is unreasonable to expect the person knows exactly what it entails and how you really feel about it until you’re in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 02:43 PM
3

I’d think they were letting me decide for myself what I want. I’d rather have the conversation and chance to decide than just being dumped. And honestly, I’d feel better about the break up if I get to say no I’m not changing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 02:39 PM
1

What if he was attracted to her dispute the lifestyle? What if he was just not self aware enough to know it bothered him until later? What if his own change and growth led him to want and need different things? Considering where he is in his new relationship it seems plausible. If he broke up and repeated the same pattern over and over it’s another story.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 02:30 PM
7

That’s a pretty heavily one sided perspective. If you met someone you really vibes with and started dating. They were a lingerie model but you are ok with that. But as the relationship got more serious it bothered you more and more until you realized you weren’t ok with it. Saying this isn’t working for me is ok. Being ok with something in theory and being ok in practice are two things. I have seen this in peoples relationships so many times about different things- someone works long hours, trav…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 02:25 PM
–

Do you really see this as the big threat? 99% of men would much rather this then a secret look to her friend who just completely misdirects like an idiot to avoid simply saying “not interested. Stop.” Normally the argument back is that women can’t do it because it’s not safe, but here you have specifically wrote in a bouncer who will keep you safe if needed. So the argument here doesn’t apply
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/23 03:28 AM
3

That is all true. Doesn’t change the fact that during the dating process, they are judging if they are compatible in a hundred different ways. If they are a person who would rather wait until you are otherwise further along and more committed and you are someone who uses sexual compatibility as a metric to decide if they want to pursue a committed relationship the waiting in and of itself provides information about the person’s personality, how they view sex and how they prioritize sex and the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 02:04 AM
2

Well I agree more to this comment than your last one where you said to specifically make sure it was well planned and not cheap. Of course a glib bing it to some dive isn’t putting in effort, but there could be some great dates that are not expensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 01:02 AM
3

You may be right, but that sounds very transactional to keep track of how much money he dropped to help decide if you will have sex
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 12:37 AM
3

That is a completely valid opinion. Others may view sex completely differently, man or woman. People who view sex as a serious affair should only date people who view sex as a serious affair. Others may not (even if they are looking for a committed relationship). Holding out for someone like you will filter people that view sex differently than yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 12:16 AM
3

I would argue that some percentage of those people who weren’t interested in waiting two months left because they didn’t fee that the two were sexually compatible. How long until you are comfortable is an indication of your sex drive. If someone is looking for a match to date long term sex drive is something to consider when looking at chemistry. Others are just assholes. Happy cake day
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 12:11 AM
3

The unwritten part is that they are interested in having a romantic or sexual relationship of some sort- long term, short term, FWB, something. No one requires you to make eye contact, talk to them, have sex or anything. But if someone is looking for a sexual or romantic relationship then physical intimacy will need to be on the table at some point. No one is forcing anyone but it is a requirement of continuing to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 12:07 AM
2

Men are 1 marshmallow people
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 12:00 AM
1

While I agree with what you are saying, the expectation on men in traditional gender roles comes into play on the first date, in a situation where it is not equal and reciprocal (unless the man is expecting her to come to his house and sweep his floors of something) I wouldn’t place sex in this equation since sex only happens if they both want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/23 02:22 AM
3

Isn’t it also about the number of men approaching? One man approaches politely, ok. 15 men approach politely in the day, it’s still exhausting isn’t it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 01:20 AM
2

You are talking about different things. You are talking about how to show interest, they are talking about approaching a stranger. The things you mention happen after a conversation has started. It’s not that a stranger striking up a conversation is necessarily making a move, it’s a women having multiple strangers approach and getting in the way of what you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 12:56 AM
3

128 pounds? What a heffer. I take back my agreement, it would really be a fat fetish to be attracted to someone like her. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:34 AM
4

Completely agree. Compared to supermodels, curvy could mean an extra large glass of water and THREE olives at lunch. Or, exact same weight but 5’8” instead of 6’.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:25 AM
3

Ironically, trying to be the best version of yourself is something that is never complete. So if you really do it and then go “see, it didn’t work” you missed the point. I would say IMO do not become something you don’t want. If it works it will become its own sort of torture and what you gain will feel empty.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:14 PM
2

Welcome to Reddit! Where for every fleeting terrible thought you may have there are 10 people to completely agree with you, 10 to say it makes you a terrible person, and 100 to correct you and argue over the meaningless minutiae that is beside the point you are making.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 06:15 AM
1

Absolutely understand. My point was just to separate what is done because of general social pressures, what is expected from other women and what really makes someone more attractive to men. I haven’t been on this subreddit long, but yeah, some of the people here are super toxic
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:17 AM
1

This may sound really silly, but to stay on the topic- eyeshadow. (Actually my wife corrected me and said it’s specifically highlighter). I honestly can’t tell the difference between her putting it on and her giving me “the eyes”. But the other makeup things? Lipstick, nail color, nail length? Straight hair, curly hair, it may look nice but doesn’t make her more attractive, just different. She still does it for herself, but understands it’s not for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:05 AM
16

Agree. When people say be yourself, often they mean be the best version of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:56 AM
1

I’d agree that there is a difference between what really makes women appear more attractive to men and everything women do daily to get done up. Some may apply, but not all of it matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:53 AM
5

Really? Ew. Yes there may be cultures where that may be an acceptable thought but hearing it said so plainly is upsetting
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:44 AM
2

Maybe you don’t understand. Mansplaining is when a man explains something obvious that a rational, reasonable person could assume they may already know. It is misogynist because they assume that (since you are a woman) you don’t understand something. …does that clear it up for you darling? (I’m obviously being sarcastic, please don’t hurt me)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 06:36 PM
7

Media is a business like any other. Censor may not be the right word. There’s tons of important things happening in the world that people SHOULD know about and SHOULD be talked about. That is not media job/goal. Give people the information and stories they want to see so people keep coming back, so they can sell ads. It’s a chicken and the egg. The media will only report on it once the target demographics care about it.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 06:52 PM
5

She may seem superficially nice, but any relationship is built around communication and respect. If she can’t have a conversation and only wants to pretend the way she acted in the past didn’t happen, she’s not the girl for you, or a nice girl. Just someone who has a persona of a nice girl. Also, if you can’t or aren’t comfortable having a conversation with her about the past and how it made you feel, how it seems weird that she pretends you two are cool, then you aren’t the right person for her…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:20 AM
12

Sexist yeah, but not hate speech.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 04:23 AM
-2

Wouldn’t removing tonsils be a more apt comparison
/r/MensRights19/07/21 08:15 PM
27

Do you support the idea of equal men’s rights? Especially in this situation, accusation of abuse without charges means he must leave his house and not return, and must wait for a long time for a police escort to get his things? We are not saying that women shouldn’t be believed, but this is a situation many of us have heard of before, and doesn’t seem like a fair solution.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 02:45 PM
38

But that is secondary to the point here- he is a person who deserves to be believed as well and supported through this. Something as simple as being able to get his clothes is a big deal.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 01:22 PM
1

Absolutely not trying to say otherwise
/r/MensRights22/04/20 01:34 AM
5

I can’t comment for USA, but in Canada(Ontario) a child can end up with multiple people who qualify as a parent. From my understanding, this could be the biological parents, a biological parent’s spouse or common law partner or someone who supported the mother during the pregnancy. When my kids were adopted through Childrens aid we heard all sorts of crazy stories about kids in the system with 3 or 4 parents that all had a legal right. Of course in a case like the one shown, if he’s paying child…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 12:52 AM
1

Yeah just 31 of the states. Much less than the 19 that don’t.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 06:08 PM
1

Fair enough. Death penalty. Good ol American Justice
/r/MensRights23/09/18 05:27 PM
0

That’s a nice soapbox you have. For a punishment to be preventative and stop another from committing the same time it must be extreme enough to create fear so it is never worth taking a chance. Rape sucks. Yes. So does completely destroying a mans life. Financial restitution is not a fair punishment, and can be avoided with a bankruptcy declaration
/r/MensRights23/09/18 04:42 PM
1

I say 12 years in a men’s prison and give the dudes carte blanche to rape her every day, so she learns exactly what she accused him of.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 03:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter