TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HandOverYourCummies Archive

View 3 posts and 131 comments by HandOverYourCummies on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

you're not worth the effort have a nice day
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:17 PM
1

You removed them. how original
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:35 PM
1

I'm sorry I have no fkn clue what the 3 last lines mean.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:32 AM
1

bad bot terrible, shitty, awful use of processing power, storage and network bandwidth. And that's coming from someone with my username
/r/MensRights15/03/20 03:57 PM
3

Not within the lifetime of anyone reading this comment and if it does happen, not without being cancelled by higher political decisions like in Germany. Intersex sooner maybe since it's not directly opposing religious cancer and/or """"""insulting"""""" the victims to say we dont want to force intersex into a case. While saying to/about cut people that we oppose what happened to them seems to often end up in a fight
/r/MensRights13/03/20 04:40 AM
1

A pleasure to see the fight for fundamental human rights being led so well
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:17 AM
1

the world health organization and UNICEF keep saying it helps against HIV UNAIDS finances the practice in this name and many health NGOs silently follow this or openly present it as a good measure.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 11:38 AM
1

What ya gonna do to them big boy ?
/r/MensRights01/02/20 05:42 AM
3

http://archive.ph/ijq4t by /u/Markalite
/r/MensRights16/12/19 05:38 PM
1

We should agree on what a mutilation is first. Imo definitions such as "important wound to the body that was forced on you" are pretty terrible because they are subjective in nature (what is "important" ?(for me I'd genuinely rather lose a finger than be circumcised, but that's my individual take on what bodypart is important to me) as we see in this here post we can't agree on that) Imo we should use the definition that goes as follows: removal of a part of the body without consent from the vic…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 05:56 AM
3

for no reason. I can think of 2 reasons 1) The opinion of people who got cut and are happy with it is not relevant to whether or not the practice should be pushed on non consenting individuals (who i should add can die or suffer other heavy wounds, altho even without that the absence of consent or necessity should be reason enough). 2) It also takes with it the issue of whether or not they truly are ok with it or, as many victims of many forms of culturally enforced practices, are layering vario…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:36 AM
1

My personal experiences follow what you say yea. 2 experiences I had make me feel you're right When I was around 15 I defended circumcision after a girl (my crush might I add) in my class said it was effective to prevent HIV but took away some sensitivity and it wasn't really cash money to do that. I remember to this day (am 24) how I instantly said there's no prof, like without any thought or knowledge, and the way it felt in my head, like my brain was hijacked by instinct to say it. Always bot…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 11:48 AM
1

Some positivity in this world and this sub sees it, thanks :D
/r/MensRights24/11/19 11:32 AM
2

If it's consensual then it's awesome they found eachother. Looks fake as hell tho
/r/MensRights17/11/19 07:05 PM
4

I was seeing 2 psychiatrists for emotional health issues and once talked to them about being upset i was circumcised as a kid and they sad I must be insane to be upset by this. No amount of talk will ever convince me I'm the one wrong to be upset people just took away part of my body for no necessity or without my consent, especially my genitals. after that a lot of things clicked together, like the fact I went to mandatory military service, basically serving a state that fucked up its most basi…
/r/MensRights17/11/19 07:10 AM
–

ok technically 1 country in the world outlawed circumcision under <16
/r/MensRights21/10/19 10:33 AM
–

South Africa c'mon, we both know nobody listens to this in SA, they have insane amounts of dead and maimed from Xhosa, this is a PR move nothing more. Iceland sees many American tourists who contribute to their economy so the threat from the ADL may have caused a temporary stay. If they made the same threat to New Zealand most would say we would prefer if American tourists didn’t come in the first place. I hope so, will keep an eye on the news around NZ.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 10:19 AM
–

Look at Germany 2011, where they reverted the decision to oppose circumcision and now have a special exception to child protection laws just for MGM Look at Iceland, which received threats from US politicians and the ADL when a party there tried to ban circumcision. No country in the world made it illegal, there's a reason for that beyond these individual countries' ethics or laws/principles. What the country will decide isn't all, external influences and cowardly politicians can easily fuck it …
/r/MensRights21/10/19 09:50 AM
–

Having said that the matter must still be solidified in law. Most likely wont happen, but one can hope
/r/MensRights21/10/19 09:33 AM
1

the ADL ? Or another ?
/r/MensRights19/10/19 11:25 AM
3

yet another group backtracks their support of child body integrity At that point who's surprised
/r/MensRights05/10/19 06:22 AM
4

Isn't this very old news and it didn't go through ? Genuinely hopeful it's still in discussion, but I thought it got shot down for a new while in Iceland.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 07:17 PM
8

This is 7 years old, the law was then changed to explicitly make an exception to child protection, just for male circumcision to be kept, so that this ruling would have no influence on anything Here's the proof: german civil code article 1631 aliena d https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html#p5749 So not only Germany didnt ban it or punish it, they specifically say in the law you have the right to do it. There's days I understand people who just want to see everyone die
/r/MensRights07/09/19 06:37 AM
2

Idk how that works, all I know is the only parts I can feel something enjoyable are the back of the scar (the upper side of the shaft) and the glans.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 06:33 PM
1

is there any way to get any legal retribution :( Most likely not, but you should ask /r/Intactivists , they might know better.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:44 PM
1

Yeah the nerve endings, do you have any explanation on what I am missing out by not having them? Apparently you lose some special nerve endings that are only on the foreskin and have a lower threshold than the other nerves. Meaning some subtler touches you could feel if you had a foreskin, well you won't there. I still have my frenulum and some torn bits of the frenular delta cuz the moron who cut me didn't bother with them. It doesn't feel anything particular I'd say. At your age it's perfect t…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 11:14 AM
1

Are you able to link me the most effective restoration technique for a young person This question pops up all the time in restoration forums and honestly it looks like no one has an actually trustworthy answer. Whenever people ask what the best restoration method is, the answer always is "whatever works best with your time/budget/occupations". The thing is there's not enough data and studying done on comparing these to have a definitive answer. What we know is, the younger you are the more effec…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 07:01 AM
1

How much is foreskin restoration worth it? I don't know man, that's a subjective thing. Most people who finished restoring will say it was absolutely worth it. Personally I only started 6 months ago and farted around for half of that time, but a week ago I had a slight rollover happening at random and I hadn't felt such a strong, wholesome feeling in years. Circumcision obviously affects you badly, so why not give this a shot ? Also sorry to say but LDAR all day has an impact on your happiness a…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:55 AM
2

I doubt it'll be affordable or even possible before most people on this sub turn 70
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:27 AM
9

Get into intactivism, even if just very light forms of it Check out foreskin restoration
/r/MensRights23/08/19 06:57 PM
1

Engage yourself in intactivism, even if lightly, that helps a lot AND helps a lot for the next generations to be more likely to be safe from this shit. Also restoration, look that up /r/foreskin_restoration Not perfect ofc, but by doing these 2 things, you have the knowledge that you're making the best thing you can do to regain some semblant of a foreskin, to tell people who cut you to go fuck themselves, and to help having less people be cut. Which results in you feeling better about it, albei…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:58 PM
2

shitty everything
/r/MensRights05/08/19 07:24 PM
7

This is about a male's right to not have a part of his body removed in absence of necessity or consent, how is this not men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 02:47 PM
6

Well sometimes it's really clear, like article 1631d of German penal code, specifically making an exception to bodily autonomy of children to cut parts of their penises off. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html#p5749
/r/MensRights18/07/19 03:03 PM
1

Glans lose sensitivity due to chaffing and any other removed part will be that less to compensate for older age's natural decline of sensitivity (like if you already have no or little pendulum left) It makes any issue related to sensitivity and or erectile dysfunction more likely to happen, and to happen sooner in life.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:10 PM
1

I'd argue the babies in the US scream enough to make it clear as well. Altho in the end neither avoided the cut
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:09 PM
2

You should(n't) see the twitter accounts fetishizing cut guys with captions describing how they screamed as children when being cut.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:07 PM
1

And they also push for it to be practiced in other countries, especially african countries.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:58 AM
6

I mean this is the first time someone ran to this specific place, maybe they just run in the streets usually ;)
/r/MensRights12/07/19 05:10 PM
1

Removing ease of access at the parents most vulnerable period. Very good point, that must play a huge role
/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:52 AM
2

I'm surprised because where I live we have <0.4% of cut rates and no official health group would dare do this. One hospital stopped giving them after a child in Germany died from it, and they were absolutely shit on until they backed down. It's nice, altho it's never confrontational enough imo, but yeah it's official stuff it's never going to be like "grow the fuck up you demented savage"... I wish tho Thanks for the source. It is however, reasonable for parents to weigh the benefits and risks o…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 06:51 PM
1

banned ? Where can I see a source for this ? Like I believe you but is there an official health organization admitting it publicly, is it in all hospitals rules ? Or it's more of a in practice thing but really nobody dares put that on a paper ?
/r/MensRights09/07/19 05:53 PM
7

That's good but the point of the movement is not about you but about those whose body can still be spared.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 01:18 PM
1

There are people who aren't, and it is in no way necessary. Your experience of being cut doesn't define why others should be when there's no need to do it and many people are upset having been cut.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 10:24 AM
1

something something circumcision and "professionals" doing them
/r/MensRights30/06/19 06:02 AM
–

male circumcision is still allowed almost everywhere Where is it not allowed ? answer: it's legal everywhere in the world. Anti constitutional but legal.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 11:41 AM
1

hot
/r/MensRights27/06/19 05:12 PM
1

Don't wanna sound paranoid but I'd like to see these fliers and posters in IRL settings or from official accounts. I don't doubt mgm supporters can be that degenerate, but I'd prefer 100% impossible to deny stuff so I can throw it at non intactivists.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 08:08 PM
6

The "this doodle's reach" map isn't trustworthy as it shows only for the german date of father's day, in Switzerland we got it today so it's counted as a separate doodle, idk if there's a way to see it internationally, too lazy but just so you know the reach isn't just germany as shown on the map
/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:02 PM
8

"Groups who don't ask for consent from their mutilations' victims now upset they weren't asked for consent before being told to fuck off" What a world of pure shit and hypocrisy we live in.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 08:56 PM
3

Any other forced penetration would be sexual assault, which had the same maximal sentence but a lower starting sentence. IIRC tho rape was also defined exclusively as a penetration with the penis.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 07:22 PM
5

Well... That debate rages There is no debate, just a constant work to deny what is obviously factual, and this is presented as a debate
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:17 PM
5

definitions are important and not everyone agrees on them. Personally I follow this definition for mutilation: the removal of a body part whole or partial, for no medical necessity and without consent. That way there is no subjective criteria to count what is mutilation, like "but X is worse than Y". There is no objective way to know what 1 person sees worse than another, for your information the majority of women who underwent FGM do not complain about it and get agressive towards people who sa…
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:43 AM
3

If it were publicly recognized that forced child circumcision is abuse, we would have long worked for better alternatives than genital cutting, so the number would most likely be way lower again.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:33 AM
4

GET BACK WOMAN THIS IS A MALE ONLY SPACE ofc you're welcome here
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:34 PM
1

“This is part of a larger effort to end the alternative summary reporting program for all medical devices.” Made me think there were chances for them as well.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 04:08 PM
19

What does that change ? There are religious reasons for FGM, stoning, murdering homosexuals, forbidding music, forbidding technology.... guess they're valid cuz muh sacred texts ?
/r/MensRights23/04/19 06:13 AM
10

don't forget to cut off your eyelids for the crust in your eyes in the morning, slice off your ears for the wax, rip away your nails so there's nothing that'll get under it.... man this medicine thing is easy
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:56 PM
4

And Switzerland and Germany and Europe overall and Texas.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 07:32 PM
2

Nice Oh I also forgot feminists and actually the entire population screaming at you that FGM is worse therefore you should never talk about MGM NGOs who "defend" children laughing at you and saying it's not an issue (they pay for it to happen, well UNICEF does) (fuck you UNICEF, and fuck you too Amnesty international you hypocritical pieces of shit)
/r/MensRights08/04/19 03:08 PM
1

Thanks I felt really inspired that day :)
/r/MensRights08/04/19 03:04 PM
1

but I'm worried that people in my class (especially those who are circumcised) will be super enraged and hate me. If you openly make a nation-wide campaign against it, you can expect the media to call you an extremist (everywhere) local jewish writers to write about how you are starting a new Shoah (happened in my country, Switzerland) have foreign politicians write to you to tell you to stop this (Iceland or Denmark, don't remember anymore, by US politicians) have politicians and organizations …
/r/MensRights07/04/19 06:16 PM
12

Yeah and this doc would be fully functional without his brain. Worth a shot.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 04:14 PM
154

And here they fucked it further than intended, but sure sure it's fully functional and like before. Change form, not function, magic.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 01:26 PM
678

it was still fully functional haha yeah sure classic medicine there
/r/MensRights07/04/19 12:05 PM
1

Tbf here it was a crosspost that also showed how the original sub just laughs at this.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 09:44 AM
2

hilarious comments, I'm still waiting to see how they'd react to a gender swap of this
/r/MensRights07/04/19 09:21 AM
28

Yeah talked a bit with an activist for UNICEF at a local train station. Dude said he felt bad he wasn't cut I asked him why he wouldn't do this now since he has the choice available unlike me and he said it'd hurt so I told him to get fucked if he thought babies didn't feel it. Incredible how people can be hypocritical about it being consensual.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 07:13 PM
3

Not availible in my country (CH), anyone would be kind enoug to paste the raw text or make a summary plz ?
/r/MensRights25/03/19 11:44 AM
8

How sad
/r/MensRights25/03/19 11:44 AM
17

Tfw satanic rituals like carving a cross on the forehead of a baby are actually LESS violent and insane than real world cosmetics.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 11:42 AM
28

"child dies from other person's """""personal choice"""""" Fuck this world
/r/MensRights24/03/19 06:56 PM
5

"medical"
/r/MensRights24/03/19 05:27 PM
7

For having a carbon copy of the rights and duties women have. Well hopefully while also giving more rights to everyone. At a personal level I mostly go against child genital mutilation of boys and the military service being mandatory for men only, and also the fact the definition of rape in my country only takes men as agressors and women as victims (that point will most lkely be changed soon tho)
/r/MensRights19/03/19 08:32 PM
2

Oh well I tried.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 07:03 AM
1

I need proof pics send d1ck
/r/MensRights18/03/19 09:50 PM
1

yes, go away woman >:(
/r/MensRights18/03/19 08:28 PM
8

circumcision for no medical necessity nor consent is mutilation. This sub is mostly against the "no consent nor necessity" version, some argue there's never true necessity for it if we did medecine right, but I safely bet more than 90% of people here are ok with fully informed and consented to circumcision. because of a decision my parents made OP clearly falls into the mutilation category
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:35 PM
12

No Every single group that mutilates their offspring uses euphemisms for these acts, in indonesia when they cut their girls the don't say to their daughter "we mutilated you for health benefits", same here. Using them is accepting to enter into a vocabulary designed to make words less impactful and is starting on a skewed position Carving the sexual organs of a baby for no necessity is one of the most depraved, disgusting acts our society does, there's no way it should be wrapped in some cuddly …
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:19 PM
3

k
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:37 PM
1

I trust you but I like to use exactly the words of the opposition so as to make sure they can't in any way say I lied. and my source is the Food and drugs administration who says "donated human male neonatal foreskin tissue" in their papers, and never "sold". I trust someone who uses forcibly removed genital tissue from children isn't going to shy at the "for money" part, but it hasn't been mentioned so I don't use it Also I hope everyone who uses stolen child flesh for "science" dies in a septi…
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:20 PM
1

Yea but the first definition of compulsory from google is "required by law" so no. But I get it the second def. is "coervice" so yeah.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 11:39 AM
1

cue audience laugh and pass to next funny subject of the week I'm not surprised anymore how so many movies/games/books depict characters who want the whole world to just die.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 07:08 PM
8

Yea sure it's not like it means an entire industry has financial interest into not letting this practice die out.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 02:05 PM
1

It's not compulsory.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:56 PM
1

I mean if it's the US then you can add millions of circumcised boys since their foreskin is used as "donated" in many products or tests.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 12:15 PM
1

Saw these ones. I believe these, just that I was hoping to come across Amnesty themselves admitting they don't want to oppose this, as in their own website docs or videos. Ofc I guess there's absolutely nothing out there where they openly admit it :/
/r/MensRights23/02/19 07:20 PM
1

Do you have a link or source for that ? I'm building up a database on what NGOs/groups are supporting it and so far haven't found anything officially acknowledging they support it from their own words/website (they sure do avoid the question though so it's suspicious)
/r/MensRights20/02/19 07:04 PM
6

this picture is almost smaller than my dick
/r/MensRights18/02/19 08:14 PM
1

Nowhere since it's her private pics or at least you present that as such.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:17 PM
1

that's really hot but fuck off
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:10 PM
2

It's that one, not OP but it's like THE one people always use
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:35 AM
4

A dating expert dating. expert.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:50 PM
35

life's hard in the 21st century :(
/r/MensRights23/01/19 02:44 PM
1

You know the feeling when you thing you have an original joke but then the first comment is exactly that ? yeah this feeling.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 12:45 PM
12

cutting parts of the genitalia for no necessity, that's not a medical procedure.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 09:46 AM
2

She deleted everything in a matter of hours. Some users on twitter archived the stuff but I cant find them anymore. They used the #FireChaya, so if you search that up the people who used it might help you.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 04:04 PM
6

Just saying, I tried to get help from my psychiatrists for that. (living in a non cutting culture) I was seeing them for other issues, mostly of self harm and (according to them) borderline personality disorder. When I mentioned being upset about circumcision they said I should get committed to a mental hospital and recommended medications. They never pushed for hospitalization before that. They said being upset about that must be a sign of psychosis (losing touch with reality, characterized by …
/r/MensRights06/01/19 03:38 PM
3

Don't forget the whole "sell the tissue" thing
/r/MensRights28/12/18 11:33 AM
2

Ah another man of culture I see :)
/r/MensRights28/12/18 11:32 AM
9

Children is much much cheaper since they don't use anesthesia Yeah they cut corners in this, not just the kid, do it with less trained personnel, less uses of anesthesia, less time passed on it, often without any prior meeting needed to take the decision, it likely has a higher percentage of the money being net profit.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 08:59 PM
4

Whatever the amount we should see in 2019 :)
/r/MensRights27/12/18 08:06 PM
6

I wonder if it's them being overly cautious due to the amount of trolling or if something is fucked in the sub's parameters
/r/MensRights27/12/18 07:09 PM
13

If someone could kindly repost this to r/intactivists , it'd be great. Everytime I post there my post is invisible and I have to tell the mods to manually change it, I'm curious if people who never posted on their sub before have the same problem.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 06:16 PM
1

Switzerland
/r/MensRights26/12/18 11:20 AM
3

No surprise, but disappointing :/
/r/MensRights25/12/18 07:39 PM
1

Wait I though the Denmark debate wasn't finished ?
/r/MensRights25/12/18 07:17 PM
6

Same, the NGOs who regularly set up posts at my local train station all support this shit or are too cowardly to ever come out as opposed to it (UNICEF, MSF, Amnesty, coalition sida.....), and I go tell that to the people who represent them there every time. It gives a lot of interesting discussions and hopefully of people eventually being less naive. But I live in a culture with <0.4% of people being cut, so obviously it's easier for them to admit there's something fucked up about circumcision.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:55 PM
9

The idea that it is somehow "healthier" permeates even among people who are against it. This myth really needs to be dispelled. I mean go see the position of UNICEF on the matter, or médecins sans frontières, sidaction.... it is truly insane how most NGOs are either lying or incompetent on the matter.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 04:28 AM
10

Yes. It's still from a foreskin. Like no the litteral foreskin didn't touch her skin, but a product derived from this flesh, same pain, same absence of consent, and that's all that matters.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 08:28 PM
5

Tbf porn has no limits.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 09:01 AM
3

you can't prevent people from practicing their religion in the U.S.. So why is it illegal to do excision in the US then ?
/r/MensRights11/11/18 04:47 PM
2

Men are the ones who get tied to cutting board and get parts of their intimacy ripped off before they're 1. Sounds to me like nobody knows what consent is or cares at least
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:17 PM
16

Let me randomly choose a subject whom I shall address in a popular Earth dialect. Salutations, fellow human! Is today's gravity strong enough for your liking? Where can I obtain 20 milligleebs of protein liquid for the morning feed-cycle? Fuck dude for a moment I thought I was at r/writingprompts, lost it
/r/MensRights28/10/18 12:21 PM
24

I mean, best case scenario nobody gets mutilated at any point in their life, only people who want bodymods should get bodymods. but then again people are shit
/r/MensRights25/10/18 07:18 PM
29

Nah the dude who makes these comics has a very, very strong focus against male circumcision in his comics and always pushes into light the hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance on the subject. So here it's most likely to show how the reaction changes solely based on the gender of the victim.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 06:32 PM
8

The amount of effort in a post matters jack shit, what matters is if it gives something useful or not to the subreddit it is posted in.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 10:46 AM
2

Lol I remember reading a book on trauma recently and they talked about CBT and I was like "cock and balls torture ? how does that help ?" turns out it was cognitive behavioral therapy but the only CBt acronym I knew was a porn genre.... I get what you mean, but tbf sometimes it's annoying to write full long-ass text and If you're on character limits you get new habits. EDIT: welp, the tbf was a reflex
/r/MensRights03/10/18 07:27 PM
22

different people different tolerances to different injuries and perceived damage, I know people who attempted suicide for bad grades. At 13, your worldview is extremely different than whatever your age is, and you know that.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 07:03 PM
59

Ah yes, refusing to be complicit of child genital mutilation is breaking the law. What a civilized society we are.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:23 AM
27

If marking children's genitals with a knife is so integral to your identity you can't live in a country that forbids it... then fucking get out thank you very much.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 10:45 AM
3

Look up r/intactivists and don't get your hopes too high, if you invest too much into the subject and trying to change the world on this, you're gonna waste a lot of strength and energy getting upset at this shit.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:14 PM
2

No, you can also take off from the 6.5 billions the USA, Jewish people, and anyone who simply doesn't even know what is removed from the body or that anything is in fact removed (as a European guy, most people where I live don't even know something is removed)
/r/MensRights24/08/18 08:50 PM
27

subincision, google, regret.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:48 PM
3

this kinda smells like the medium angst part of r/incels.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:05 PM
12

Taking that a step further
/r/MensRights02/08/18 05:19 PM
213

fuuuckk now this is next level debunking for a shit meme x)
/r/MensRights28/07/18 07:35 PM
78

99.9999999% sure it's troll
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:16 PM
7

Modern mags Page 10: The #MeToo movement Page 12: I tried skin treatment derived from baby boys amputated parts haha it's funny dick facial joke Page 14: my body my choice Page 16: body positivity Yeah fuck these people
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:34 AM
1

it might eventually work. right now it doesn't
/r/MensRights26/07/18 07:25 PM
13

You can non-surgically restore a "foreskin" It's not a real foreskin that you'll get back,but rather new shaft skin that'll do the cover of the glans It doesn't get the frenulum back nor the ridged band it takes years it's possible to fuck it up bad few medical professionals would even know what it is so you can rely solely on forums But afaik (and I've dug for a while) there's nothing closer to having a foreskin again. r/foreskin_restoration and r/restoringdick Foregen is a company that claims …
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter