TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HankDevereaux Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by HankDevereaux on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

You want 'decent' not 'descent'.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:45 AM
1

You have been misinformed about what empirical means. From dictionary.com: "depending upon experience or observation alone, without using scientific method or theory, especially as in medicine." When you have a site with a tremendous amount of traffic and that site's content is primarily pictures of attractive women and it has a recurring series focusing specifically on thigh gaps the balance of probabilities shift heavily towards thigh gaps being an attractive trait in women.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 10:22 PM
1

where is your empirical evidence on the male preference for thigh gaps? This is a whole heap of it. The Chive isn't exactly an unpopular site either.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 05:32 PM
2

Women can still feel the pain of rejection.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:11 PM
1

Depends on exactly what you mean by force. The fine and imprisonment part is not something that's carried out, but in order to receive federal student loans you must sign up for it.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:04 AM
2

I think the subtle difference is that many feminists claim that the feminists that pull fire alarms and do all that bad stuff aren't true feminists. Whereas 46n2arejustaheadofme is making the claim that the proportion of good stuff to bad stuff done by feminists is such that you can't claim the "bad" feminists to not be true feminists because they comprise such a large portion of the movement. I don't want to speak for 46n2arejustaheadofme, but it seems their argument more plainly stated is this…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 08:30 PM
8

Pederast is specifically an older man with a young boy.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:55 PM
8

According to the most recent data, females account for 55 percent of Americans living in poverty. I was definitely surprised to read this. If the majority of homeless people are men how do they end being the minority of those living in poverty? I know poverty and homelessness are not equatable but it's still weird considering if that figure is correct then it means that men, more or less, are either homeless or not in poverty (broad generalization but I think you can see my point that men would …
/r/MensRights15/01/14 11:57 PM
-24

I don't see how this is relevant to Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 12:11 AM
1

That is a totally valid opinion but as far as I could tell (maybe I glossed over it or misread) she's not receiving any sort of court mandated psychiatric help. You can't conclude that a mental imbalance was the cause of her actions and then do absolutely nothing to remedy the imbalance.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 01:53 AM
6

They refer to the boy as the victim and say there might be other victims. I think this article is just fine. You can't expect them to use the term rape when by all appearances the sex was consensual and she's not even being charged with statutory rape. Aside from the comments at the bottom of the page there is absolutely nothing to be mad about here.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:40 PM
1

Am I the only one who didn't have much of a problem with this article? Adding this qualifier, Admitting he was talking in ‘broad brush strokes’, the director of undergraduate admissions at Oxford added: ‘If you are using timed multiple-choice assessments, that has a bearing on the likelihood of the female students even finishing the section.’ made a difference to me. I understand that it's frustrating to their attributing success to what's essentially blind luck but it didn't seem all that unrea…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 12:50 AM
6

Depends on where you go. My (public) highschool has had virtually 100% graduation rate for a while (maybe one kid a year didn't graduate).
/r/MensRights20/10/13 06:39 PM
1

I'm confused. From your original post it seems like you're saying that sitting with your legs open causes back problems but here you're saying sitting with them crossed is what's bad. Edit: NVM I just re-read your original post. I don't know why I thought you had said sitting with open legs is bad.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 01:30 AM
1

Can I get a source for the bad for your spine part?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 12:09 AM
58

"there wasn't any evidence" pleaded guilty in an Alford plea that admitted prosecutors had enough evidence to convict her.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:42 PM
2

I really think some kind of self-post actually articulating the point the image is trying to make would have been much better. The very idea of men's rights is incomprehensible to some people; it simply has not occurred to some that we might face discrimination. If we are to make progress, those minds are the ones that need to be changed and an image like this seems childish and comes off as we're getting mad that women are involved in video games now (I know that wasn't the intention of the ima…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:54 PM
7

I would say in this one particular instance it could be considered nitpicking but that phrase, "women and children", is extremely prevalent whenever talking about groups of people dying. It's definitely used in a way that implies their lives have more value or it was more tragic that they died. I don't think this is an issue that needs much attention but it's clearly indicative of society at large's view of men, to wit their disposability.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 06:34 PM
1

Where did he get the numbers for domestic violence? When I looked through the CDC website the surveys I found had statistics that are contrary to what he was reporting.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:33 PM
4

Where did you read about her other offenses?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:54 PM
13

then frankly you wouldn't belong on a death penalty case jury. Why? Only people who support the death penalty should get to decide who suffers it? That's a good way to put a lot of people to death.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 01:38 AM
13

It says "guys are wired for sex" (at least I think it says sex, there is a glare in the photo). That doesn't seem to indicate it's a matter of social pressures (at least in the author's POV). 'Wired' definitely implies an innateness. For example, you wouldn't say men are wired to be the primary earners in a family.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:44 AM
8

I wasn't too bothered by the article except for two things. She completely misunderstands what culture is. If the editor of Esquire says that in the context of his magazine women are used to sell copies much in the same way cars are (that's what he meant by ornamental), that doesn't mean everyone got together and had a discourse about the issue a decided it was morally okay. To jump to this conclusion: So we are basically living in – and allowing to flourish – a culture that says, out loud and p…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 08:04 PM
6

Or if someone was only looking for a white assistant, or a protestant assistant. It's just not right to preclude half the population from getting a certain job because they have a y chromosome.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:21 PM
16

How the hell was that transphobic when he specifically said that he is perfectly okay with her lifestyle of living as a woman? I agree that he could have perhaps been more sensitive in his word choices but you would have to deliberately misinterpret him in order to reach that conclusion. "I support 100% anyone's right to be transgender." That is unequivocally not transphobic.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:12 PM
-1

16, under 18, forced by public defender to make a plea Slow yo roll dog. It may be easy to criticize the public defender but it aint right. PD's are underpaid, under appreciated and overworked. Unless you happened to have sat in on Banks' discussions with his counsel you have no reason to think Banks' was forced to take any deal. It wasn't the PD's job to litigate with reckless abandon; remember Banks was facing 40 to life if he pled not-guilty and lost. It was his job to ensure the best interes…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:26 AM
1

I thought you meant recorded video is not considered evidence.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:45 PM
1

According to whom?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:30 PM
52

The jury was also told that Ms Doyle had previously stabbed the engineer twice – on one occasion in 2006 – but there had been no prosecution in relation to that. Since when is it not illegal to stab someone?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:16 PM
18

How a sane person says that with a straight face and not on a sitcom is beyond me. It sounds like something you'd hear in the town meetings on Parks and Rec.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:44 PM
18

Year after year the same quasi research topics pop up, sometimes even under different headings, and the same old garbage trotted out. This one had me cracking up. The hallmark of science is being able to replicate results, but apparently that's a bad thing in this case.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:23 PM
3

It's a joke man.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 07:35 AM
10

It'll be interesting to see what they do with special forces. IIRC women are/were specifically prohibited form becoming Navy Seals.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter