TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hannibal_Barca_ Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by Hannibal_Barca_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

What is considered a "top 20% man" is a result of aggregate demand, not individual preferences. It is essentially an emergent phenomenon that arises from many individuals expressing their preferences. Individual women can and do deviate in their preferences and if you were to ask individual women to organize pictures of men in order of appeal, you would find that they aren't all into the same guys. What you would find though is that some men seem to rank higher than others enough of the time for…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 10:30 PM
1

Generally speaking I agree with you, but some people have very distorted views of reality. Sometimes she isn't gaslighting you, she just had 20 arguments in her head and a highly validating discussion with no actual advice or reality check from her girlfriends and when she starts the 21st argument with you in person, but you have no idea what she is on about and you think "she's crazy".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 10:17 PM
4

Misandry can lead to the full force of the state to be used to arrest and convict a man for something they didn't do severely limiting their freedom and autonomy... and that can also lead to being raped, murdered, hintered, abused, sexualized, enslaved, objectified and denigrated.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 07:30 PM
1

It's not sexist, because my generalized hatred of an entire gender is grounded in histrionics!
/r/AntiFeminists11/08/22 11:17 PM
3

The notes regarding prison are particularly egregious given the massive level of inequality that already exists in the justice system.
/r/AntiFeminists08/08/22 06:54 PM
2

Appreciate your comment, I had not come across the false abstraction concept before :) The person who was stalked and violently attacked, was followed into their apartment as they were getting home and closing the front door sort of thing. They filed a police report with the assailant was arrested and convicted. The person then moved away from their apt back with their parents for a couple years, because they didn't feel safe, and they did undergo therapy. They have thankfully recovered after a …
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 11:16 PM
2

Is it just me, or is raping someone with the intention of it leading to pregnancy ethically materially worse than just raping them without that intent.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 08:59 PM
1

Men also are more likely to work in undesirable locations and times. Men also are more likely to work in jobs that are considered low status and dirty, but which pay a premium. Men are more likely to work in jobs that take a toll on physical health (like pilots dropping chemicals on crop fields)
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 08:57 PM
1

You know all those diversity training courses we take that go through things like unconscious bias? One thing that struck me about them recently is if you look at the examples provided in these courses, you almost never see examples where a straight white man is in the role of "victim" or person being incorrectly judged. Here's the thing I find sort of funny about this. If a straight white man is the boss, he understands others like him and these training courses help him bridge the gap with oth…
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 08:52 PM
3

Agreed that it is overexaggerated. The thing that bothers me about discussions regarding sexual assault is the false equivalence implied by the narratives of these kinds of experiences. There is a massive difference between an unwanted and short experienced groping, a not fully consensual sexual experience between existing partners, someone doing something they don't really want to in order to be polite, someone intentionally getting another drunk in order to take advantage later on, and someone…
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 08:38 PM
1

I've considered this idea in the past as well so I figure I should add some flavour/notes: A situation where fewer men reproduce, but more women reproduce might actually be the natural state of human nature. It's a demonstrated fact that more of our ancestors are women than men. The situation where men and women pair off into married couples might be more anomalous than people think via "artificial" socially enforced monogamy. Socially enforced monogamy exists because it leads to more stable soc…
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 08:19 PM
18

To add to the reasons why it's a terrible analogy, a stab wound is clearly detectable even long after the fact. In a sense a more apt example would be someone saying help I was stabbed, while having no visible markings of a stab wound, but even that brings in a host of issues. It's kind of an analogy that is so bad it's beyond repair. Edit: Also worth noting that framing the issue of sexual assault as unwanted penetration is sort of strategically silly, because once you add in knives and bullets…
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/22 07:17 PM
10

I feel you, and agree fully with your sentiments. I would only add that I find it frustrating that there was an obvious shift that professional feminists could have taken that would of ensured them continued work during their lives that wasn't taken. The focus of feminism has been the emancipation of women from traditional roles, but there has been no similar emancipation of men from their traditional roles. Modern women want traditional 1950's men, but with the extremes bits that negatively aff…
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/22 09:06 PM
3

Yikes, as someone in the field this is embarrassing.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/22 04:46 PM
3

Based on my experiences, I have no basis to conclude that there are fewer or more women than men who have a lot to offer a prospective partner. There are plenty of women and men who unfortunately offer very little as well. These are the ones who jump from partner to partner short relationship after short relationship. At the end of the day being a good partner is a combination of value system and a skill that people work at.
/r/AntiFeminists02/08/22 01:47 AM
6

yikes the projection.
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 11:42 AM
1

You are describing deflection which is essentially using deception to obfuscate. Moving the goalpost is more like openly changing the foundations of your position.
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 11:26 AM
1

They are also just straight up ad hominems. Newmaniac is assuming a situation where both people are engaging in this sort of behaviour which is common, however I would point out that they are commonly used in response to actual arguments. I have an interest in philosophical discussion, and in my experience, what happens is the discussion starts out civil and as the feminist realizes their arguments are falling flat (normally because they are spouting buzzwords and one liners they think are cleve…
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 10:45 AM
3

It was a tangent to the framing of how I was describing relationships. The idea is we stay in relationships based on the perception that both parties are contributing and the way money plays out in divorce, there is an artificial skewing of that perception which tends to lead to more divorce; it's an interesting unintended consequence.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 10:27 PM
3

Owe is the wrong term to use because it relates to an obligation, and may imply a transactional dimension to the relationship. I think you are getting at where I go with it which is not that you owe something, but if you care about your partner you should have some drive/desire to have a positive impact on their life. You may not want to put out the trash or do the dishes specifically, but you can still have the overarching drive to be helpful/useful/show you care which drives behaviour. The tri…
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 09:38 PM
3

This unironic example of a feminist moderator saying they only accept pre-approved responses and perspectives on the forum is why it's so hard to tell sometimes when a feminist post is genuine or setting a straw man / trolling. It's not even just one of the rules... it's the top level one! ahahha
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 04:32 PM
18

I somewhat agree with her as well, but in the sense of your partner is going through some pain/unpleasantness in general, you should make some effort, and more so if they are doing so sort of on behalf of the relationship. I don't think anything is "owed" though, and I dislike the mindset that comes with framing the topic in that way. If people in relationships start going down the path of thinking that way, they've already messed up.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 04:25 PM
4

Men obviously don't work like that, our hips are angled differently than women's, and we have these things called testicles that don't super love being crushed. This just comes off as wanting to make men suffer for the sake of it, and if that solution is linked to concepts of gender equality, its a great way to nudge men dislike that idea. Women are unlikely to enjoy all the sexual harassment they would get sitting in public in provocative positions likely leading them to dislike men more than b…
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 01:10 PM
1

It's a good point, but the stats are still ridiculous.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 11:42 PM
64

I can't help but interpret this as a belief that "Men should not have places where they can discuss issues that affect them, because they may realize there are issues that affect them and start speaking up about it". I think we should call it what it is, it's sort of sad and terrible of a perspective.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 11:26 PM
2

I see this 10 hours later assuming the against men's rights community mentioned in the post is also a banned subreddit since yours was. It's not, and the dramatic difference in treatment is a clear demonstration that there is a problem/there has been an overcorrection.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 10:31 PM
8

In other words "Hates men, but loves the dick".
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 10:53 PM
1

A cold hard truth about the world of bullying, it's almost never racist or gendered in origin, people are just picking out the most obvious traits to antagonize... it's about them engaged in a generalized anti-social behavior to compensate for some negative feelings they have.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 04:53 PM
1

Formal accusations with a police report? Uncommon. Informal accusations? Common.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 11:14 PM
7

wait... this was her response because her food would take a couple minutes?
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 01:40 PM
1

Agreed on personality. Also agree that sexual compatibility is more important for a higher probability pairing. The reason I didn't say that is vs. high sex drive is what we can make of the data on its own. Basically I was thinking about it from the frame of mind of "what if we just know person A's #, but not their partners?", what can we reasonably infer and you can't infer compatibility with just that. I also agree that there is a lot of variability (like people with a low # but high drive), b…
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 08:05 PM
1

Not very inclusive of them.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 05:49 PM
2

Preference comes into play, I am also thinking about things like high sex drive, high impulsivity, high need for attention/validation, past trauma, poor skills that make someone a desirable lifelong partner. I also think it's worth noting that this is these are the sorts of statistics that should give both men and women pause regarding their choices, sure women a slightly more impacted, but men are definitely very impacted as well.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 05:34 PM
3

Great compilation. I think there is an interesting cause v. correlation element here worth unpacking. I suspect the causal connection can be broken down further conceptually: Past relationships have an impact on things like expectations; but Traits that a person has that leads them to more sexual partners also might not align well with happiness in marriage
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 04:57 PM
0

Although I strongly support legal abortions, and I think this is a step back. I do find the obvious hypocrisy interesting - how negatively people who claim to care about equality are responding to equality of reproductive rights. My hope is that this leads to water cooler discussions and people engaging with these topics from an angle they haven't before and leads to an outcome where abortions become legal, but also that the legal framework takes into consideration some of the concerns that men …
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 10:33 PM
1

Not understanding why others may interpret this terrible just screams social cognitive deficit/very low empathy.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 12:03 AM
1

I am often critical of feminism, but I feel like there are women who are legit feminists, then there are women who try to milk it + traditional norms for all it's got. Unfortunately a lot of the latter group also refer to themselves as feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 06:48 PM
6

The crazy is intentional and serves a function. The point is that no matter what, you are implicitly guilty/flawed/deserving of some punishment. No matter what the discussion is, it can always be brought back to that original sin, so the person questioning the ideology is always wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/22 03:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter