TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hannyu Archive

View 2 posts and 651 comments by Hannyu on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
56

IntactivismHannyu/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:06 AM
44

Edu./Occu.Hannyu/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:13 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Okay but can we reclaim fag from a slur back to general behavior based insult? It's a really satisfying insult and I hate that to be a decent person means not using it because it's tied to sexuality. Actually, can we just have a word draft like once a year like how Chapelle Show had the race draft?
/r/MensRights24/07/26 08:56 AM
8

Straight man, not taking the bait on the chivalry trap used to get me laid so much. "Chivalry is dead and women killed it." is a panty dropper even if they act offended publicly. On god, if straight men would take some lessons from our gay bros on not stumbling over women, they'd have a better batting average. And not be chasing low value women (unless that's their target audience. Sometimes degeneracy is a good time, not yucking anyone's yum.)
/r/MensRights24/07/26 08:49 AM
2

I didn't say that men don't do most of that labor, but you were acting as if it is a zero sum game which is not the case.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 08:30 PM
3

And some of them do. I know a few women that will work circles around most men in male dominated fields (agri, industrial, etc). You aren't making any valid points, just spewing anger and hate. The domestic work has to be done, rather by men or women. I don't have a problem with men doing it instead of women. Has to be done either way, rather single, married, or otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 08:12 PM
1

Yes, we're all aware of this. It doesn't change the point I was making. Would you prefer if I used venomous creatures being brightly colored as the analogy instead?
/r/MensRights22/07/26 08:02 PM
4

Okay. You just sound irrationally angry. Those tasks have to be done one way or the other, and filling everyone's schedule to the point no one can keep up has shown to be a deteiment to our society, not a boon. Not respecting work because it's not physical labor is just ignorance on parade.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 07:58 PM
5

I don't care if men or women work, or what the division of labor is honestly, I respect domestic labor so it's whatever as long as it's contributing to society for me. I just want to be able to have a single income household become a normal thing again, not needing 2 incomes and a side hustle just to get by.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 07:54 PM
3

The "nuclear family" wasn't even a household term until the post WW2 era, before that it was mostly used in academia for about 20-30 years. Feminism as an organized movement started about 70 years before the nuclear family term was coined. It achieved the 19th amendment around the time the term was coined. Not that you're wrong about feminism not being what it claims. It absolutely is not, it's a female supremacy movement, but lets not just make up historically verifiable things that will get yo…
/r/MensRights22/07/26 07:18 PM
6

This. It was government and business supported feminism because it diluted the labor pool. Keeping wages down is easy when you double the pool of laborers available. They never gave a fuck about empowering women, they cared about how much more money it let them shove in their own pockets.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 07:04 PM
4

That gets down into law that varies by state, much less internationally, so I wasn't going to propose anything on that front, but yes that could be a resolution for some areas.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 03:53 AM
26

I'm glad we knew so we could prepare accordingly, but I definitely see merit in it considering these women are condoning literal eugenics against half the population.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 02:40 AM
69

Let them keep exposing themselves. It's always been misandry. Now they just feel comfortable admitting it publicly. Which makes them easier to avoid. It's like the racist with the rebel flag flying in his yard, if they display their colors it makes avoidance easy.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 02:37 AM
1

I wasn't even talking about just physical characteristics. I mean what we want in a partner. Someone who beings peace, comfort, support, not chaos, drama, and emasculation.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 10:05 PM
1

The best part is that it is shown, re fucking peatedly, that most men prefer a low maintenance look. Yes, attractiveness matters to men, but women are missing the mark on what men are attracted to.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 07:01 PM
9

Exactly. They used to lump them in generically with incels before manosphere became the new "thing" They'll use any available subgroup to undermine the actual MRM and to avoid giving it legitimacy.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 04:50 PM
12

Women are, for the most part in western society at least, the gatekeepers of sex. By having a legal, accessible option that takes away a lot of the "soft power" tied to sex. Also, if it's legal it can be regulated - that means it should help reduce the issues you talked about compared to accessing it illegally. It should also help reduce trafficking of women for sex, because when they can legally get it, the demand for illegal supply drops. It also looks like a win for feminism and women's right…
/r/MensRights19/06/26 02:24 AM
6

That starts with making companies compensate people for production instead of to own their time. And stop the "other duties as assigned" clauses so that you can't be hited for 1 job and made to do 5. Daycare mentality is created for and by the executive class so that they can own you. There's a reason they want people back in office and off remote work. It's about power and ownership. Basically, we'd require a complete systemic overhaul and actual worker's rights to actually resolve the issue.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 12:32 PM
1

Honestly this is stupid, but I also hate US work culture and am generally in favor of getting more vacation time however we can get it, like other civilized nations with actual worker's rights have. In this instance, I think I care more about fucking capitalism than I do about it being sexist, so fuck it, good luck to them.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 12:26 PM
2

Because it's not necessarily a real thing. It's a reframing of some aspects of the male experience in a way that they can weaponize it against us and it be socially acceptable. It's what women have been doing to men for ages to shut them down - emotional abuse and manipulation. Let me try to give a parallel example, but it may or may not be a perfect fit as I work through this... A lady in my small, southern bible belt dwelling town was recently posting on social media about the lack of communit…
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:53 PM
1

The only time I've seen femnists address violence by women is when it is targeting other women. Mostly in regard to lesbian domestic violence. And even then they are doing so with the utmost mental gymnastics to try to blame men and "the patriarchy." Because it's somehow totally men's fault that women beat on each other in their view, because they seem to think everything is to be blamed on men.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 02:23 PM
2

Ahhh. I didnt see his follow up so I was confused. Appreciate the clarification!
/r/MensRights29/04/26 06:00 PM
3

What do you think I said that was racist exactly? Because I made the comparison to some middle eastern cultures? I made that comparison because those envrionments still exist there to this day. Why do I need to dig through history for examples that are not current when we have current examples? To call that racist is a stretch. At worst you might could claim it's anti-islam, but even that would be pushing it to have any validity.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 05:48 PM
13

Which is absolutely insane. I've mentioned my wife here several times over the years, often in the context of how greatful I feel that she does not embody the negative behaviors of modern feminism, and I can't remember having not one single instance of anyone having a negative thing to say about me having a wife or about her for being a woman.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 05:24 PM
4

I get where you're coming from, but at least as far as western culture is concerned, he isn't entirely wrong even if he expressed his opinion like a jackass. My thinking is this - if modern women continue this misandry movement they are currently engaging in, eventually their rhetoric of violence against men will lead to some women thinking they need to actually do it, not just talk about it. When that starts happening, what is the overall result going to be? Men will stop being tempered and pat…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 05:02 PM
1

Tbh ubtil he grows up, we'd probably be better off if he stays a virgin and doesn't procreate.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 02:16 AM
3

No, no it's not. It's an emotional reaction not supported by science, logic, or reality. It is hard to be taken seriously about actual men's rights and issues when people like you are out here spouting MAGA level nonsense like this as if it's factual.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 02:15 AM
1

Ted season 2
/r/MensRights20/03/26 06:11 PM
2

That damn "yes homo" will get you every time!
/r/MensRights20/03/26 03:56 PM
8

Screwing another dude would be pretty gay I guess. Unless you say no homo first and don't look in his eyes.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 03:31 PM
1

I try to keep a no regrets view on life, so I try to take moments like failed relationships, bad jobs, etc as learning experiences. Like yeah it was a dogshit experience, but did I learn and grow from it? Then I'm better than I was and it wasn't a waste of time.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 09:31 PM
2

Honestly I don't think any of them would have ever had any problem (other than falling over their own feet 😂), but better safe than sorry, but that would be true rather they were guys or girls. I've picked up plenty of bros from the bar at 3am to get some coffee and food, drove 'em home, and got them put to bed too. It kept them from trying to drive home, which in itself was worth whatever it cost me in time and money.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:02 AM
3

Reading comprehension is clearly not your forte, but even when having it clarified and further explained, you insist on doubling down about what I said and meant. I'm so glad you know what I said better than I do and were able to inform me. I applaud your commitment to the lifestyle of stupidity.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 12:38 AM
1

I didn't say that. You're putting words in my mouth. I would have walked home anyone drunk who needed it. I've driven many men home over the years to get them home safely too. It's just basic decency. Anyone inebriated would be best off to not be out wandering around alone, it makes them an easy mark. The difference is, men have been far less likely to ask for the help. The girls would call us and ask us to come down and walk them home.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 12:25 AM
1

They want to be the only victims.*
/r/MensRights04/02/26 11:30 PM
7

Did it occur to you that they may have been taking their blackout drunk asses home -so- that nothing terrible would happen? I walked many drunk women back to their dorms or apartments when I was in college just to help keep them safe, because it was the decent thing to do. We had a group of guys in my dorm (co-ed dorm) that would go walk girls back from the bar or frat parties or whatever so they didn't have to be walking alone after dark, and we tried to spread the practice to guys in other dor…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 11:20 PM
1

Because it impacts men more is exactly why. It's seen as "normal" for men to go bald. Rather right or wrong, that is the general societal perception.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 11:08 PM
1

Disability? I can't wait until I can stop wasting money on razors for shaving this shit off. I hate how hair is treated like some kind of fucking holy grail.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 11:04 PM
10

You dodged a bullet. They aren't all that way, albeit a -lot- of them are, but there are some who will be genuine, supportive, and loving partners. Be glad you weed the rest of them out before getting married or having kids with one of them.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 10:52 PM
9

The best thing you said was at the bottom and I think it needs to be isolated and pointed out. "Just be a man." Men need to stop listening to women about how to be a man, what it means to be a man, how to act as a man, etc. Be yourself. You are a man and they can't take that away from you. There are as many ways to be a man as there are men on the planet.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 10:49 PM
4

Facts. And I never forget it - I basically hit the lottery. The more I see how many women these days act, the more thankful I become for my wife. Marriage is high risk. Best advice I can give is find a woman who wants to be with you, not one who needs to (for various possible reasons - financial, emotional, social, whatever hole she's trying to shove a man shaped plug into.)
/r/MensRights31/12/25 09:30 AM
2

Gender should be a protected class, which should include men - meaning if you're targeted because of being a man it should be treated as a hate crime just like if you targeted someone over skin color or sexuality. The problem with that is feminism had demonized being a man so well in their propoganda that most people will mot actually see it as a real possibility. In their minds men can't be victims, much less targeted for being a man. It's a good example of the limits to fighting only in the le…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 08:28 PM
1

But he brings up a good point - it's more than just feminism and misandry. It's also the result of class warfare. The wealth gap is insane and looks to only be getting worse. When traditional jobs won't make a living, what do kids do? Dream of the jobs that will let them be free and wealthy. I see it more as a condemnation of our economic situation than our social one on this particular issue.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 09:48 AM
1

That's by far the most extreme response to it I've heard to cat calling rejection. It's typically something like "well you aren't that pretty anyway", which yes she was or you wouldn't have been hitting on her, so it can be disregarded as a bruised ego. Chanting die bitch die, wouldnt blame you if you called the law on them.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 10:14 PM
2

Insults are not the same as cat calling and you know it. Unwanted compliments vs insults are what you're trying to equate. There is no logical equivalence there at all.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 10:11 PM
1

You think young men don't get taught to be aware and alert to our surroundings too? That we just go through the world all la-de-fuckin-da without a care in the world? You're taught to carry mace, well hell I was taught to carry a gun. This thread is full of men saying specifically that they stay alert and aware. Your feelings regarding safety do not overrule reality.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 08:28 AM
2

ban·ter /ˈban(t)ər/ noun the playful and friendly exchange of teasing remarks. "there was much singing and good-natured banter" verb talk or exchange remarks in a good-humored teasing way. "the men bantered with the waitresses" You're half right. There's not an "exchange" of remarks if you don't engage so it's only a one sided attempt at banter. You can absolutely say it is rude and bad behavior, hell you could even call it harassment if it's repeated and they have been told to stop, but to try …
/r/MensRights24/12/25 08:23 AM
4

Uncomfortable and unsafe are not the same thing. Absolutely that would be uncomfortable, it's poor manners and behavior, but it's not the same as unsafe or dangerous. This is a great example of the root argument being disucssed here between feeling a certain way and reality not matching that emotional response.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 08:18 AM
56

Where her content really shines to me is when she's holding women accountable. Her content that tries to educate women about men...sometimes misses the mark. Or is a bit too broad. It'd be like me as a non-native speaker trying to teach someone a new language - it might be "correct", but that don't mean if's right.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 03:18 AM
2

I asked my dad when I was younger why he didn't have it done to me and I really liked his answer. He felt it was a religious act and that as such, I should be the one to decide that for myself when I was old enough. I'm the same way about my kids, they should decide for themselves once they are old enough. I decided if God wanted me not to have a foreskin he would have made me without one 🤷‍♂️.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 01:44 AM
3

I believe my wife threatened to sue them if they kept harassing about our kids too. We were scared to leave to shower or use the toilet because we were worried they'd whisk them off and do it anyway.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 10:23 PM
2

It's a start. I'll take what I can get. Frankly we should want equality in both, so even though this likely won't pass at least it's a start.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 08:31 PM
4

We chose not to mutilate our kids. They came around with they were in NICU and constantly tried to get my exhausted and stressed wife to slip up and agree to it every time I was out of the room. Hospitals are the worst. They make it very clear men are second class citizens at best.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 08:29 PM
1

Maybe more recently. I remember growing up that hair loss was all but shameful. I don't remember seeing bald as a common style choice until about 10 years ago or so.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 09:38 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEET Here is the wiki for it. It has become used more as a slang reference these days and is kind of broadly used to cover traits or actions that would be considered a "failure to launch" so I don't really want to get into trying to speculate and describe it in my own words too much and then have someone be pedantic about it.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 09:36 PM
2

If they think I'm fucking up my life by working hard, trying to be a good dad, and having a hobby then they can fuck right off 😂. Do I do it all perfectly? Hell no, but show me someone who does and I'll show you the 2nd coming of Christ.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 04:37 AM
4

Man I'm a millenial and I work full time running a warehouse, have a leatherwork and print business on the side, raising twin 6 year olds and I still like video games 🤷‍♂️ they're my life long hobby like hunting and fishing are for my dad.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 04:13 AM
5

I agree, they are a problem. Not strange or shameful at all. However, if being into cross stitch or fashion or whatever non traditionally masucline thing is your thing, fucking rock that out like a boss too is all I'm saying.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 04:03 AM
3

Most likely they "support" it to avoid cancel culture if I had to guess. Not supporting it would have them attacked and labeled as bigots, racists, etc. Some companies still get attacked even if they support the causes for not being "woke" enough. It's really out of hand.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:54 AM
3

Those in charge of what exactly? Sorry the first part of your comment I'm missing the context on. Social aspect is part of it, but the men who are already retreating from society are less concerned with that, and that is a growing demographic as a result of the war SJWs and feminists have waged in men for decades. And yes you can watch porn, but they still have a biological impulse for sex, not just getting off, so if they could have that without the social requirements that come with it current…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:43 AM
2

I mean if prostitution was legal wouldn't it basically just be sex work at that point? All I've seen is feminists oppose the notion of it being legal (under the guise of objectification, but considering it would be a trade by choice if legal, then I guess they would be mad at them objectifying themselves? And also contradicts with the notion of female sexual empowerment and freedom...)
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:28 AM
2

Right, I'm not saying it would be my preference or anything, but I realized that my biggest concern for them into adulthood is being falsely accused by some crazy bitch either because they get caught doing what teenagers are going to do or because they're trying to use them and threatening/trying to control them with "if you don't I'll say you raped me."
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:24 AM
6

Exactly. Some of the hardest working people I've ever met barely had a pot to piss in. Most of the wealthy people I know came from a wealthy family already or got incredibly fucking lucky.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 03:00 AM
6

Well my main point was just that we are already seeing the signs of it, which suggests that unless society reverses course, you may very well be right about what to expect in the future. Isn't OnlyFans like a porn site rather than actually sleeping with them? I'm sure they're fine with that, it keeps men on the hook wanting them but they can still remain inaccessible or more likited in access. The desire for them and thus their power that comes from it, decreases greatly if you can drive down to…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 02:59 AM
3

I've yet to run into that. MRAs I've run into have pretty much all been about letting men be men their own way, which can include but isn't required to include traditional masculine ideals.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 02:50 AM
4

I told my wife a few weeks back I would be less concerned about my kids as teens if they were gay. I see the rise in feminism as that big of a threat to their future, that I think being gay, even in the rural bible belt, would be less dangerous. And I can remember a time when I was a kid in this same area that being openly gay would get someone jumped and the shit beat out of them... It has changed that fast.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 02:47 AM
40

I mean aren't we already seeing some signs of this in Japan, the UK, and the US? NEET culture, decline of marriage and childbirth, being called "less ambitious" because they are not getting married and having kids, thus living for themselves and not driven by providing for a family. Also why feminists fight prostitution being legal. If it was truly about female empowerment they would be supporting them being free with the sexuality to do that if they want to. Instead they realize that would unde…
/r/MensRights04/01/21 02:39 AM
6

Be told its all your own fault, you just don't work hard enough. Like hard work magically fixes everything. Must be fuckin nice living that Mayberry life for those people.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 02:33 AM
3

I'm bald because I choose to shave my head, not because of hair loss, I never understood the link some people make between a full head of hair and confidence with men. I feel way more confident with it shaved by choice than with a full head of hair personally.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 02:31 AM
0

Well you were right up until the end. The ideals associated with traditional feminism could have coexisted with men's rights, but feminism in practice, especially these last 2 waves, has not been about women's rights but the destruction of men. So we can't really coexist with a group that is demonizing and trying to destroy and/or subjugate us.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 09:49 PM
3

This sub supports mens rights. That includes their right to do feminine shit if they want to. It's about having the choice for each man to make that decision for themselves rather than others making it for them.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 09:42 PM
2

This is just bullying by the school system. Imagine a system of bullies not doing anything about bullying. shockedpikachu
/r/MensRights07/12/20 09:40 PM
1

I do this as an adult to a degree. If I find something I like I may buy 5 or 6 of them, particularly with something like jeans. Takes all the hassle out of it. Grab n go.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 08:41 PM
6

Exactly this. Its jewelry, sneakers, hair styles, something. There is going to be something they have to stand out and pick on others about.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 08:35 PM
5

Thank you :) I do my best but still feel like I'm screwing it up half the time 🤦‍♂️ and then I have a weekly panic attack about only having 12 years left until they're adults to try to get them ready for the world, but also trying to let them enjoy being kids.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 03:32 PM
43

I just had a conversation with my wife the other day about guys and nail polish. I think its a pretty feminine thing to do but she was pointing out that for some subcultures like grunge/emo its part of their look. Either way I don't give a shit, if they want to do it let them. Its not hurting anyone else even if it is being viewed as feminine. So even if its not my personal preference you best believe I'd be cussing the school admin like dogs if they tried to do this to my kids.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 03:10 PM
1

When my parents split up when I was 10 or so, the judge pulled me into his chambers to talk to me 1 on 1 to see who I wanted to live with and determine if I was mentally competent enough to make that decision. I (mistakenly) told him I wanted to stay with my mom but if it wasn't working to be able to move in with my dad no questions asked. He made sure it was part of the legal ruling that I could make that decision of my own volition at any time and thank God he did. Since that day I've told any…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:29 AM
2

I personally would hang them up and skin them like a fish while still alive.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:22 AM
6

And doing gymnastics from my understanding can actually interfere with the menstration cycle to the point of stopping it for some women. So that would be in the opposite direction of whats hapoening here...
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:20 AM
2

Yes. Their job is law enforcement and not to protect and serve. They're basically like the guys who would break knee caps for the mob to get paid, but for the government. It's all about money.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 06:18 AM
41

I don't know that I agree with your last statement even that most pedophiles are men. Men get the most attention for being pedophiles, so it certainly seems that most pedophiles are men, but when women do it they call it "hot for teacher" "inappropriate relationship" "they were in love" and insert any number of other deflections or excuses that down play the reality - if they were men they would be hung out to dry like the pedophiles they are. Until society starts holding women accountable for t…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 10:38 PM
1

Well, that person wins my piece of ahit of the week award...
/r/MensRights09/04/20 10:33 PM
1

Yeah from the information coming out about it she is just an incredibly shitty human being (literally if one of the things coming out is true which says she took a shit on his bed)
/r/MensRights03/04/20 06:20 PM
34

Lovely how many of them are openly admitting to either being willing to rape or coerce a man into doing something. If the tables were flipped the men in the video would be on a fucking registry somewhere, having their lives and careers destroyed - and not even for actually doing something, but just for suggesting it.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 06:15 PM
8

Feminism is no longer needed in the west for sure. In my opinion the goal should be to reach a point of equality where the MRM no longer needs to exist either.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 06:02 PM
3

TLDR she accused Johnny Depp of abuse, got him all but blacklisted in their industry and was trying to drag him over coals in divorce. Now it comes to light that she is full of shit and has been the abusive one. A lot of people didn't believe Depp for a long time because apparently those with vaginas are innocent perfect beings that never lie, until evidence just continued to pile to an undeniable point. And even now some try to deny it, kind of like flat earther's.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 05:54 PM
9

If anyone has grounds and clout to do so it would be Depp in this situation for sure though.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 05:47 PM
4

I agree with you that a lot, damn near all, of what comes from feminist thinking is opposed to common sense, but when you look at say, the make believe wage gap, on the surface that sounds like a bad thing. Oh no they get paid less. Then you learn about why, lack of them wanting high risk/high pay jobs, lack of working tons of over time, choices not to advance careers in favor of personal life. So it actually takes some education on the issue to understand. Or their fabricated rape statistics, w…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:01 AM
2

Not true. Were her advisors, regional governors, local authorities, military authorities, etc female? Those are all positions of power. Yes the monarch may be the top of the pyramid so to speak, but the quality of people in those other positions can very well be what makes or breaks a society.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 07:15 PM
3

I've always made my stace on this perfectly clear with women. I believe in equal rights. And lefts. Try to hit me like a man and you can catch hands like one. Want to be treated like a lady, act like one. Of course then its "well you'll go to jail" "yeah and I can stomp your ass until they get here" When faced with the reality that I am willing to go to jail to defend myself from physical abuse they re-evaluate their stance on thinking its okay to hit me.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 06:13 PM
7

It's not common sense though. It's something learned. Common sense is a phrase that gets grossly misused to under-value learned skills and information. Just because you have been aware for 20 or 30 years doesn't necessarily make it "common sense" it just means you have been aware longer. That could be anything from someone being stupid and lacking common sense to an age difference where in you are aware simply because you're older and have been around longer.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 05:57 PM
4

Yeah pretty sure that one can happen already. Get raped, she gets herself knocked up, then refuse to pay child support on the rape baby.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 05:33 PM
3

No, its really not. There's a more to it than just sex, but thats another topic. Honestly though, I wouldn't be upset if my kids were gay in this day and age, even in the bible belt of the southern US. I'd be less worried about dealing with someone giving them shit for being gay than some teen pyscho trying to ruin their lives with false accusations.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 04:19 PM
7

The two aren't mutually exclusive. As long as women are using fools like feminism, #metoo, and legal advantages like affirmative action you have no choice but to fight them in order to fight for equality and respect. Those are the tools of oppression, along with their propoganda about how men are supposedly priviledged and everything is geared to favor men. If you don't fight back against those things you might as well be pissing upwind. Thinking you can just fight just for issues and not agains…
/r/MensRights16/02/20 04:02 PM
1

You went on a rant then excluded the vast majority of the people I was originally talking about, which made your whole fucking rant senseless and unnecessary. If you had reading comprehension in the first place you never would have needed to respond. You are just trying to get the last word in, which means its worse than I thought. You're not illiterate you're just an asshole.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 05:41 AM
2

The legitimately disabled and those left to care for them are directly who I was fucking talking about for most of my post. Jesus H Christ people, reading comprehension! I'll be sure to let all the young people with expensive medical situations know its their fault they had such a bad thing happen and at their age they didn't have time to work up the ladder to a high paying job and save up to pay for it all plus expenses after they get fired for not being able to work anymore too. You're in a sp…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 03:34 AM
1

If I'm contesting the kid being mine then I'm going to jail I guess. If you pay then you might as well be in jail anyway. Question is do you want the state or your ex to be your warden?
/r/MensRights22/01/20 12:51 AM
0

Who is to say they weren't able to afford the child at the time? Circumstances change and often due to factors beyond a person's control. Was it their bad decision that the company they worked for went under? That one day they just stopped paying them? That nowhere else in the region is hiring for jobs that will pay the bills like their old job? Is it their fault they got hit by a drunk driver and are on disability now? Is it their fault they got cancer and can't work and have huge medical expen…
/r/MensRights22/01/20 12:42 AM
1

Wow thats just beyond ridiculous.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 05:22 AM
3

I was telling a coworker this today. Never pay and then try to dispute. Paying is as good as admitting responsibility. I try to tell my wife this too, if you don't owe it don't pay it, if you do then you've already lost.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 03:44 AM
4

You are aware that many of these people are good, hard working people? They aren't all lazy do nothings, drug heads, they aren't poor because of bad decisions, just like many who are wealthy are not that way based on their own work and success, but because they inherited it. Some people get dealt a better hand in life than others, some never have opportunity to escape their circumstance. I tend to vote republican (see: events in Virginia right now as a prime example of why), but economics is one…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 03:42 AM
6

I want r/crappylaws to be a real thing now. It would be both informative and entertaining
/r/MensRights21/01/20 03:33 AM
1

It did though. In that view you are disposable. Once you're burned out they discard you like a worn out machine cog. It lacks humanity to hold that type of view which is why I hate it.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:52 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing with you, but in America a lot of people see society as synonymous with economic prosperity. People are seen as disposable parts to be replaced when they break. So if they can work you until you break then discard you, they view that as a win for society. They think things are working they way they should. I disagree with that, but I have to acknowledge that view point even if I find it disguisting.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:54 PM
3

The one that always chaps my ass is how they keep trying to use "boys will be boys". I grew up in an area and time where that was a common saying and never used in a manner to make treating others with disrespect (bullying, aggression) okay. Boy gets his leg broke because he was trash can lid surfing behind an ATV? Boys will be boys. Underage drinking, falls and gets a minor concussion? Boys will be boys. Things like that, but never, not once by anyone other than SJWs and feminists compaining ab…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:50 PM
1

Twice unless you're using military time
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:43 PM
1

Well for society as a whole, it is good. We're more productive to companies and society that way. Not so good for the individual, more wear and tear and abuse taken for someone else's benefit. So I think it comes down to which point of view you're using as to if its good or bad.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 04:42 PM
5

You can find plenty of conflicting studies and medical opinions on the topic. Just search this sub for the topic, shouldn't be any shortage of them. Point here being, "studies" don't necessarily amount to jack shit. Especially depending on who funded them.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 09:46 AM
1

No shit? I missed that one. I thought they were actually doing good 😔
/r/MensRights08/06/19 09:32 AM
1

It's not the useage or the sign. It's that they have been taking out men's restrooms (which in public places usually have like 3-5 urinals and 2-3 poop cubicles) and putting in 1 family/nongendered restroom. So take out 5-8 toilets and replace with 1. If we took out women's restrooms and did the same thing there would be a melt down over it, but since it's men no one cares. It's about the principle of it. So yes, that is significant. You're the one using the words victim and opressed. Don't try …
/r/MensRights19/05/19 05:15 PM
3

The trans community is absurdly small statistically speaking. Not loud enough to really make any noise on a national level on their own, especially when some of them want to fly under the radar. However, it's easy to use them as a tool to demonize men, especially straight white christian ones. You paint them as this helpless opressed class of people and demonize men for keeping them down. Then you start trying to capture territory, both philosophically and literally (ie seeing mens bsthrooms dis…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:38 AM
2

They aren't mutually exclsuive. The left and feminist have been trying to use the trans community like a weapon against men, especially conservatives. The trans community probably suffers the most from this since the backlash will largely be directed at them and they're a pretty small group (compared to the population as a whole). Since they get used as a weapon against men, it makes sense that the overlap and conflict in men's rights and the trans community would become a topic of conversation.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:33 AM
3

I've noticed a lot of places removing men's and just having women's and "family" restrooms. I don't mind more family bathrooms, especially when I have to take my kids, but when I need a fast in and out piss I want a men's room.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:30 AM
1

A fetus is a human. We have a fundamental disagreement here. I would say that biology sides with me on this one. A plant is a plant even when it's just a germinating seed. A human is a human when it's a developing fetus. State of development doesn't take away what it is. It's not a metamorphisis like butterflies. I've already explained to another guy in this thread that the self defense argument doesn't hold water for pregnancy. If you start a fight then shoot the other person if they fight back…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:21 AM
0

No, the leech would not be entitled. It is an outside force. A fetus isn't. I've already covered that. Instinct doesn't make it okay. We've built society by denying our base instincts in order to evolve and do better. So I would disagree with your asserment that natural instinct is part of legal doctrine. I've already established that it isn't felony assault and suppoeted my reasoning as to why it's impossible for it to be. I'm not circling this with you again. You're being obtuse and not even d…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 10:07 PM
1

It absolutely took stance on rather it has a right to the host's body. In the case of the fetus it is a result of the host's actions. It doesn't choose the host, the host's actions choose it. That entitles it. In the case of the leech the leech is taking action to attach to a host. That requires intent on the leech's part to attach to me. As I said before, independent action on part of the leech. Thus it has no entitlement to attach to me. Having sex doesn't force you to, but you run the risk. S…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 09:44 PM
1

It is a human, and I've dismantled your argument for it being self defense. Again, a leech can act independently. It may need a host, but it is able to take that action to find a host. A fetus can't. They are predetermined to their host, by the host's actions not their own. Lastly, a fetus doesn't independently attach itself to me. It develops as a result. It has zero decision making or choice in the matter. Just because I go swimming doesn't force a leech to attach itself to me. It takes indepe…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 09:26 PM
1

I'm replying to comments that pop up on my reply box at this point, not following you. You can drop it any time you want. Words have meaning. The purview of cannibalism is defined by the meaning of the word. So yes, if the meaning of cannibalism doesn't align with what you're saying it means then it means you are wrong. That is a valid counter to your argument.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 09:07 PM
1

1) a leech is not a human 2) a leech is an already independently functioning organism existing outside of my body. A fetus isn't. 3) a leech attaching itself to me is not a result of my own actions. It takes the action of attaching itself, as you said even if I go swimming in leech infested waters. A fetus would be the result of my action of intercourse. Completely invalid comparison. Context matters.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 09:04 PM
2

It doesn't mean they can't commit crimes, but their state of development does. I already covered this in another reply to you on here. I also covered that it isn't cannibalism and that they are incapable of assault. So this reply really just circles back around to topics I've already addressed
/r/MensRights18/05/19 09:00 PM
1

The other creatures aren't humans. They don't have the same rights as humans. Now you can argue the validity of the morality of that til you're blue in the face, but as the apex animal on the planet we get rights that they don't. So you have to work within the confines of the context. You're talking about killing another human in one scenario, but not in the others.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:55 PM
1

Wrong. The fetus is a consequence, not a cause. They did not elect to be brought into existence. Their consumption of nutrients is a direct consequence pregnancy resulting fom intercourse. There in, they ARE entitled to them, as they are a result of the host's actions. They are blameless. The fetus is taking no elective actions that they can be blamed for. Now you can argue that the host isn't at fault if she is a victim, but I've already established that exceptions are generally granted and app…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:51 PM
1

You can be human and incapable of certain actions. I.e. coma patients. A quadrapalegic can't walk, a mute can't talk, the blind can't see, such and so on. So now we've established that you can be human and incapable of actions that other humans take. A fetus is trapped inside an amniotic fluid sac, developing into a being capable of independent function. That makes it physically incapable of taking action to assault someone else. Since we've already established that pregnancy is a consequence no…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:46 PM
3

Man I live in the bible belt and you can get free condoms all day at the fucking health clinic. If you can here surely you can in other places.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:31 PM
2

No, pregnancy is a consequence of the action of intercourse. That draw of nutrients is not the responsibility of the fetus and they cannot be held accountable for someone else's actions. That would be akin to saying its okay to kill someone for breathing the same oxygen as you, stealing your oxygen. It holds no merit legally, logically, or ethically. So either the woman is trying to escape her consequences, or is a victim as mich as the fetus, and even most pro-lifers agree with exemptions for v…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:27 PM
3

"Grevious bodily harm"? Get the fuck out of here with that nonsense. You clearly have no idea what grevious bodily harm really is. Also, they are unable to defend themselves. Certainly defenseless. Innocent can be peocen in that they are a consequence of intercourse. They did not choose to exist. They hold no blame in that. They are not guilty by simply existing when they didn't even initiate their own existencr. Since they can be proven innocent, there is no case for your off the rocker neglige…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:23 PM
4

No, its not. Not even close. A fetus has taken no actions to be held accountable for. It's incapable of that.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:19 PM
0

Talk about a stretch. You know about cause and effect? And how babies are made? Just in case - babies are an effect of intercourse. Thereby, they only exist because of the actions taken by others. There are incapable of assault, much less sexual assault. Mental gymnastics and going for a gold medal on that one. Yes, they could be considered a parasitic life form, but you could say that until they're like 4 or 5 and able to feed and care for themselves independently without starving to death. Inf…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:18 PM
1

Defend themselves? Delusional. Pregnancy is a consequence of actions. It's not protection, its escape from consequences, excepting for women who are victims of a crime (ie rape). Even most pro-lifers support exemption for mother's health, rape and incest.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:08 PM
-1

Different situation entirely. This so called counter argument is a perfect example of why context matters. In one scenario, a defenseless and innocent being is murdered. They've had no opportunity to live life and do good or bad. In the other, someone is either making the choice to do bad or defending themselves or others from it. First, notice in both that it is about the person not the tool. Second, if someone gets shot/stabbed/etc while attempting to do harm to another, they first violated th…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:06 PM
4

Men's fashion choices are overall lacking. I dread clothes shopping because of it.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 12:06 AM
1

I disagree here. Biology absolutely plays a factor. Less so in modern times with the tools and technology we have to assist, but for much of history women would not have been able to do much of the work in these types of jobs physically. Especially not considering the down time and physical drain of child bearing. At best the progress would have occured at a noticably slower rate, at a more realistic glance, it probably would have resulted in far more injuries, deaths, and a failure of humans to…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:32 PM
5

Few things are more annoying in 100 degree weather with high humidity and a case of swamp ass than hearing office women complain about the battle for the air conditioner.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:25 PM
3

Honestly, I think being a post-op trans is something you should have to disclose in the same manner you should disclose STDs. It may not seem like as big of a deal due to not having the same physical health concerns as an STD, but finding that out too late could potentially have a devistating mental health impact. While it's their right to live that lifestyle, I also respect the right of others to not have to agree with it or want to be intimately associated with it.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 04:44 AM
3

They already do as much of this as they can and push for more. Even 12 years ago when I started college it seemed like half of freshmen orientation was about giving women special treatment. That was also the first year at that college that they started requiring you to attend a semester class of what was supposed to be helping you transition to college life. I can't imagine its gotten any better since then.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 04:33 AM
2

It brings a degree of personal and community to fulfillment to many people. Rather you agree with them or not, the societal impact religion has is easy to observe both at the level of the individual and the community. Yes, it can also have a negative element, but that can be said of just about anything else as well.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 04:16 AM
2

I'm almost 300 myself and honestly, I'm taking my chances on overpowering the gunman. I sure as shit ain't outrunning him or a bullet, so at least that way I have a chance.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 06:50 AM
1

I mean, I think this is a little different from a mall cop playing hero. This was a true imminent danger life or death situation. Self defense rather than initiating violence against someone breaking into a car or stealing from Macy's.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 06:45 AM
1

Yeah I used to ask questions like "who the fuck does that?" before I had kids. While I would still never hit a 3 month old, I understanf the place where that comes from. It certainly doesn't help that in the US we have an obscene divorce rate leading to more single parents and no paternal leave to help out in those early months when things are hard. There's no real systematic support network, just people going "well don't have kids then" like that's actually a good idea (for why it's not: see Ja…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 06:16 AM
6

That's one of the easiest arguments to destroy, as you certainly won't see them advocate for men to take more roles in the fields dominates by women. Hell often you'll see them become enraged at the notion.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 04:26 AM
2

Let them judge based on a portfolio of assets and finances and I bet those number trends change 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:09 AM
2

Live your life and do what you want as long as its not stepping on my toes 🤷‍♂️ As others have said, egalitarian, so I'm not going to give you special treatment nor am I going to treat your poorly based on your status or identity as a trans person. Personally I tend to think they have some mental health issues that need to be addressed rather than being born with the wrong equipment in their pants. Main thing that points me to this is the still absurd suicide rate even post transition surgery. T…
/r/MensRights12/04/19 04:18 AM
0

"They don't just do what they want and judge others for not going into harder professions." Except that exact thing literally happens daily. It's a foundation of the right wing economic ideology. "What I do is more important than what you do so I deserve more." "I pulled myself up by the bootstraps and work harder and deserve more than you." "Doing job X doesn't deserve a living wage." Such and so on. This also bleeds over into people who are less successful in reality than they are in their own…
/r/MensRights12/04/19 03:29 AM
11

I mean, it should be that way - to be able to trust your healthcare professionals, but it's not even close to reality. As long as we have special interest pharma companies and people running hospitals like a for profit business instead of a public service that will never really be the case. Not to say that I entirely blame doctors, nurses, etc. They're largely doing what they were educated and trained to do. The problem is their education and training is ultimately guided and regulated by people…
/r/MensRights12/04/19 03:12 AM
1

If the police get involved in a DV situation you're probably the one going to jail anyway, even if you were the one being abused. If you're doing the time might as well at least be for self defense instead of for being abused.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 04:44 AM
2

I believe in equal right and equal lefts 🤷‍♂️ I wouldn't let another man beat on me and I won't let a woman either just for having a vagina.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 04:42 AM
5

Yeah I never understood that thinking. I've been called racist because I don't tend to find black women particularly attractive. I don't have anything against them for their race or think they deserve any less in life for it or any such nonsense. I just generally don't find them as attractive as white, asian, middle eastern, or hispanic women. I also don't find other dudes sexually appealing, that doesn't make me homophobic, just straight.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 04:38 AM
6

I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day
/r/MensRights11/04/19 04:32 AM
5

I come from a pretty heavily religious area in the bible belt. Its gotten so bad that I'd almost rather my kids deal with the hardships of being gay in an area like this than have some entitled thot try to ruin their lives for having a crush.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:05 PM
8

When I see this it's not usually looking for reassurance or positivity, but solutions to a fucked up situation. In these cased people usually know they fucked up and piling on isn't constructive, they're looking for solutions and help not someone virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 04:27 PM
4

When combined with being another minority (LGBT) it helps, more so when you're high ststus and wealthy. If he got found guilty there would have been outcry about racist and lgbt-phobe and such and so on.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 12:24 AM
5

Ask Jussie Smollett? Seems to be working out for him getting all charges dropped for faking a hate crime
/r/MensRights28/03/19 12:07 AM
14

Because they're not white basically.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 12:05 AM
1

In fairness, all of the things you listed should ve legal in my opinion. If you're responsible enough to operate a car or motorcycle then you should be deemed responsible for how much precaution yoilu want to take with your own life. A woman should be able to sell her body if she wants. I'm also not against the decriminalization of drugs, though feel it is a deeper conversation than a surface "make it legal"
/r/MensRights25/03/19 04:05 AM
2

Pro life is about opportunity to life. It's not the idea that you can't discard your own life with stupid ass decisions like coat hanger abortions or suicide by cop.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:59 AM
1

They were who I planned to speak with first. Since VAT is for international shipments I'm wondering if I'll get directed to customs. Basically what they have been doing is sending things out, having them modified to increase value, then returned state side. So they're having forms filled out saying the inbound value is the same as it was when it was exported, which is a known lie, and acting as though no improvement or change in value occured. This allows them to avoid VAT tax when its re-import…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 06:00 AM
1

Honestly I don't know. I'm in an at-will state, so even if they couldn't directly fire me for that they'd just make up bullshit to write me up and then fire me and say it was unrelated. I'm not knowledgable enough about the laws related to that stuff to know what, if any, kind of protections I would realistically have against retaliation or how well it would actually be upheld in court in a state like this.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 05:46 AM
1

Some of it was emails that I printed and kept for evidence, some of it was just written logs of incidents with time and date and notes on it with my side of the story rather actions or conversations. I have had to use something like this before and will again if needed. I also have emails showing my current employer planning to dodging VAT taxes 🤷‍♂️ I'd like to turn them in for that now, but would lose my job since they would know it came from me even if it was "anonymous". When I find another …
/r/MensRights13/03/19 05:27 AM
2

I used to feel that way about lists too until I had to keep one to defend myself. Had a supervisor who I thought (correctly) was out to get me fired for personal reasons with no work related cause for his behavior. I realized I needed to start keeping a log of everything from my side to protect myself.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:07 PM
8

It is. I watched the video of him on the View tqlking about it, and thats exactly what he was getting at. You need a mother and father figure. Doesn't have to be biological. He compared how he seens Stallone as a father figure in his profession for what he did with him on Expendables.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:18 PM
1

Unless that genius was hoping to see her hang herself and get fired?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:38 PM
2

Reminds me of trying to dodge Nestle for being a shit company. You can try your best but they own so much shit its almost impossible not to use something they own even if its under a different name.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:36 PM
1

I agree. And it's usually buried in there somewhere. Either a teeny tiny footnote in the publication that you need a magnifying glass to see, or a one off line in the middle of the article about it that a casual reader will miss or be too bored to notice the significance of. Otherwise they do their best to present it entirely as the insitution that did the research. Also killed me that I saw them scrub out all the techs and assistants who did the actual work, and only note the PhD who just took …
/r/MensRights25/02/19 06:40 AM
1

A lot of times they do their best to mask the funding for the research. It may be produced by the USDA for example, but they won't openly acknowledge funding from special interest groups or corporations unless you happen to know where and how to find that information, which is something most people probably don't as they generally don't concern themselves with it and have no reason to doubt science without exposure to see these types of things. Also, I was refering to them ignoring findings that…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 06:00 AM
2

Think we have one of very few men's shelters in the US also. For as backwards as this state can be mens rights seems to be an area where we fare decently.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:48 AM
7

Unfortunately this is true in all fields. I've seen the same when I used to work in agriculture research. They would ignore all tests and findings that didn't support their agenda and promote the one successful one that did, as opposed to treating it like an outlier fluke, which it often was. The real problem was not about political bias here so much as money. Their funders wanted results, so to continue getting funding intellectual dishonesty became accepted. Ethics and intrgrity were lost to c…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 02:51 AM
1

It either benefits women or oppressors. Though the former is working hard to become the latter
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:56 AM
1

I have glasses. Still had to squint on mobile.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:18 AM
2

Thats exactly their goal at this point - to obtain all power and rule over men. They feel entitled to that because they believe (wrongly) men were doing that to women for all of the history of civilization. They don't seem to understand that for most all of history it has been the haves ruling the have nots, rather than men over women.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:17 AM
3

Exactly. Replace it with Jews are evil! From a white guy in a group of white guys. People would collectively lose their shit about anti-semitism, nazi-ism, etc. If not they would be presumed anti-semites, nazis, kkk, whatever and rightly so.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:15 AM
4

If they are that scared of every man in general, when we make up half the population, then they are definitely the ones with issues. I mean, everyone here knows that but I still feel the need to point out just how absurd that reasoning is.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:09 AM
6

If by trained you mean told "food is in the fridge, pans are in the cabinet, if you get hungry you'll figure it out" then sure 😂 My parents both worked nights when I was a teen so I basically saw them in passing or on weekends when hunting season wasn't in. Was more of a necessity than trained.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:07 AM
3

I mostly lean pro-life (excepting life threatening situations and rape victims, basically I disagree with abortion for convenience. Personal responsibility in not getting pregnant in the first place is my stance on those.) so I'm not really upset with that. Just love how he signed in a drop in taxes but is hiding the increase to taxes on fuel though, so more money for the Waltons, Tysons, Hunts, etc of the state but hitting the already generally poor people of the state with an offsetting increa…
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:04 AM
3

The electoral college did its job - stopping the entire country from being ruled by the heavily populated northeast and west coast. That said, I don't think dems anticipated the support they would lose in younger generation by rigging the primaries against Bernie and not doing a good job even trying to hide it. Nor at anticipating how unlikeable Clinton was. They picked the only candidate who I think could have possibly lost to him. I know far more people who went to vote against Hillary than fo…
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:51 AM
1

Same argument I heard in 2008, if you didn't support Obama it could only be because you were a racist. And guess what? It worked. They successfully shouted people down that election with that rhetoric. I feel like that started the downward spiral that led us to a place where we could end up with Trump as president.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:42 AM
3

This ass backwards state actually doing something right
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:39 AM
22

Who thinks men can't cook? Many of the most famous and respected chefs in the world are men...
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:38 AM
2

I have to say in regards to the workplace that's not actually been my experience nor that of people ai've talked to about it. I've run into more male bullies who have ego issues and want to flaunt their authority, or bring shit from their personal lives to work and try to exercise power the only place they feel they have any. As society has moved further away from it being acceptable to kick the shit out of someone if their behavior becomes too out of line this behavior has increased. Work place…
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:45 AM
2

Thanks for reminding me!
/r/MensRights08/02/19 03:53 AM
2

I think our work culture contributes to this along with the gender issues. Men of power want other men to suck it up and accept their position because its easier to maintain power and status if you can silence potential competition. If you speak out about injustice, including those caused by other men, you hurt their power dynamic. This isn't a patriarchal or gender issue so much as a socio-economic one when viewed from this angle.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:35 AM
3

Problem occurs where she is trying to physically control him. If she were strong enough she would have forced him into contact. If a man did the same it would be at minimum sexual assault. That crosses the barrier from plain old rejection into fending off assault.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:12 AM
10

Be smarter than her. She obviously wasn't interested in learning why this is wrong despite her social conditioning. Add an Ex to that girlfriend before your world gets ruined.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:07 AM
1

If he knew about this video for sure. Otherwise before it was said and done he'd probably be arrested for attempted rape
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:05 AM
5

In an ideal world we could sit at the table like adults, air our issues, and work out solutions. In reality, some people will never learn their lesson until they're punched in the mouth. The problem is our society has very heavily geared itself to only letting one side do the punching. It's not ideal, but I agree that fighting back may be a necessity at this point. One thing counterculture icons such as Ozzy and Manson taught us, bad publicity can be better the no publicity, and right now MRM ge…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 11:57 PM
2

I mean, I think its less legitimizing the idea of toxic madculinity and more of a satire/ironic naming to point out the absurdity in the whole concept. Kind of like the boss who accuses everyone who calls in sick of being a faker until he's the one sick and is like "oh, well, shit..." when he comes back to the office and everyone calls him a faker.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 11:45 PM
3

Unfortunately being combative with feminism is a must. They actively try to shut down MRM because they somehow perceive it to take away from their causes. If their causes were legitimate there would be no need to try and shut down MRM. The problem is very few of their causes, at least in first world countries, are actually legitimate anymore. It's not about women being equal, uts about women being superior. They feel entitled for any past slight that may have possibly occured to any woman ever t…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 06:26 AM
2

This is really awesome what you're doing. I felt like the questions were well thought out in terms of how they were presented (many surveys like this are overly vague and don't allow for answers that are situational) and showed clear purpose. Very interested to see the results and what kind of participatjon you get overall and results from MRM/egalitarian types vs non-MRM responders.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:50 AM
82

A lot of young men are. More than what will even speak up about it, which is an increasing number as it gets worse.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 08:00 AM
2

Happens in high schools too. Watched every local scholarship be awarded to a girl in 2007. Granted she had a marginally higher gpa, by like 0.1 or 0.2, but she lacked the like slew of extracurricular activities the rest of the top 5 or so of our class had (3 of which were guys and one other girl, but she was bottom of the 5). It was pretty obscene and blatant that they didn't truly look at any of the male candidates (FWIW, there was another guy in my class who was probably more deserving academi…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 08:14 AM
1

His politics aside, Amiri King (made his name on comedy videos then got more into right wing social media) has been fighting CPS due to his ex causing issues and trying to get his kids taken away. I believe as a result he has set up or may still be trying to set up a foundation for fathers fighting for custody, particularly against women who use CPS as a weapon. May be of interest to people here.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 01:54 AM
2

I think the difference in these is it seems to be acceptable for both men and women to talk to men that way, but only for women to talk to other women that way.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 01:39 AM
15

Yeah thats one thing I hated, how they threw down Stark and Banner, but this teenage girl could out tech them like they were rookies. Nonsense. I liked her too, but that was absurd in every sense. Was nothing but a fempower bullshit play for SJW points
/r/MensRights23/09/18 11:24 PM
6

Should be much worse. Any scholarships he may have had, potential career as an athlete, and now his work prospects after being found innocent. St 26 they'll want an explanation of why he wasn't working at all up to that point in his life with no education to show in its place. He should be able to sue her for everything she has and then some.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 07:06 PM
2

See, there we go with the -phobe and -ist shit. You can't have a real conversation about something when you've automatically dismissed it by labeling it like that. Currently people would largely support lynching pedos I imagine. Doubt many would take offense to publicly executing them given what they are.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:00 PM
1

Grow some balls? What the hell do you expect me to do? I don't know nor have any proof that anyone is a pedophile. Can't go around making accusations and calling people kid diddlers with nothing but suspicion. If I did have evidence I would put their ass 6 ft under. I wouldn't trust the cops to get it right. Discuss them. Call them out. Call out what spending habits you're talking about. Spread awareness. I nor anyone else is stopping you. I think you majorly misread my comment and took it as so…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:54 PM
3

You mean like when they said "what happens if we let the blacks start marrying whites? Are they going to let the queers get married?!" Remember once upon a time homosexuality was illegal in most of the US (or at least the actions related to it such as sodomy). The idea that it would ever be allowed was scoffed at because it seemed so absurd. I suspect it will come with challenging the age of consent. "But how old is 15 really?" (Question that was asked after R Kelly pee'd on that girl. There was…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:48 PM
2

So you're using anecdotal evidence? Then let me also - I know a lesbian couple who gets abused by the LGBT community because they just want to mind their own business instead of throwing parades and making a big deal out of their sexual orientation. Just because you've not seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And that national attention? That had a huge impact, regardless od if it was a minority or not. If you can't see the pattern and connection in people's arguments and behavior over time fr…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:41 PM
2

I didn't say it was bad. I said it was abnormal (as in not normal, not in a derogatory way.) Nor that it harms anyone. Just that the link in it opens up the gate. Remembwr there was a time during the civil rights when people said "its not like they're lettin the queers get married". Now they're saying "its not like we're letting pedos sleep with little kids" but we'll see how that plays out over time. It also set a precident on how to force public opinion by shouting people down with name callin…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:33 PM
-8

It is different. I didn't say it wasn't. I said that the tactics used to push for social acceptance of LGBTQ will be used eventually to try to push the normalization of pedophilia.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:16 PM
6

No, not "expressing it openly." You're reading what you want, not what was written, even after you fucking quoted it. There's a difference in being openly gay and being in your face, demanding it on every TV show, filing lawsuits against businesses, and expecting special treatment because of your sexual orientation. There's a difference in being openly gay and trying to publicly shame anyone not holding your nut sack for you because you're gay. The latter type of actions, the ones done to shout …
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:12 PM
8

The fuck are you talking about "again" and whats with the name calling? Get a grip. I didn't change the fucking subject. I never said it was okay that we have a bunch of fucking pedos in positions of power. I said that eventually their terrible behavior will become normalized because we keep normalizing sexual behavior that isn't "normal" No part of that is saying its okay. It's just saying that its what will eventually happen because of the way we've taken society. Not that its a good thing.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 04:47 PM
1

I expressed the normalization of non normal sexual behavior. That includes gay. Sorry but statisticaly it's not a "normal" behavior. Think you're taking things the wrong way.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 04:42 PM
8

I have said it before. Many people have said it. That as you continue to normalize abnormal sexual behavior then eventually this will happen. We got screamed down as -phobes/-ists and they yelled slippery slope fallacy. Now its looking like we were right. Not to say I have an issue with gay people, just with the way its become in-your-face and like some of them expect special treatment for their orientation. That part of it is what leads to ahit like them trying to normalize pedophilia.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 04:19 PM
2

TL;DR old people have always complained about "kids these days"
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:30 AM
11

Shut your face, bot. It's after midnight I'll make all the spelling errors I want!
/r/MensRights14/09/18 05:11 AM
10

Damn that was a good listen. So much quality stuff there. I love the bit where he's really breaking down male disposibility and how they call that priviledge.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 05:09 AM
99

It's from Sun Tzu's Art of War. The woman was defeated from the moment she made that bad claim.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:25 AM
1

Update on the situation that led to this post: Thank you fine folks for the resources. This helped a lot, as the initial article apparently wasn't enough to stop the poster's claim that being uncircumcised causes penile cancer along with crazy misinformed accusations about the uncut and smegma, cleanliness, etc. I've shared some of the sources you all shared with me and hopefully in the face of over 30 articles of "you're wrong" they'll shut up, quit trying to bully their daughter into circumcis…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:43 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:46 AM
1

Sure
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:46 AM
1

Whats the link for the wiki?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:11 AM
2

Not familiar with Google Scholar. How do I get google to access it instead of just a plain google search?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:41 AM
6

Creationists are far more reasonable than feminist in my experience, and I've lived in the Bible Belt my whole life.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:12 AM
3

Be glad. My kids had to go to NICU for a month being premies, we got constantly fucking hounded about it even when we said no repeatedly. Then they would try to ask my wife when I wasn't there (actually, they tried to do that a lot and tried to bully her into whatever they wanted). They even tried to word it in a tricky way to get us to accidentally agree to it. I was scared to leave them there for fear they'd do it when we were out getting dinner or some shit. Fucking ridiculous. At one point I…
/r/MensRights30/07/18 03:02 AM
2

I'd have told him better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. I will say that thankfully my parents always made clear to the women in our house that if they came at me like a man I had the right to defend myself and stomp the hell out of them like a man.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 06:05 AM
37

I'll say this, I've seen a rise in women turning away from feminism finally. It's gotten to a point where the radical aspects of it are now open and mainstream, where as it seems like in years past (pre third wave) the more radical ones were hidden behind an army of women who truly believed it was an equality movement. Unless you were involved in the feminist academia, they largely went unexposed for their insanity. Slowly but surely, getting the information out there combined with their own abs…
/r/MensRights20/07/18 04:10 AM
10

We already see what happens. They fear them, psychologically abuse them, and try to brainwash them into the cult of feminism. On occassion a few wise up and realize how fucking stupid they've been due to having a male child, but it seems like that group is the minority among them.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 04:14 AM
2

I'm juet trying to figure out who has time to go to starbucks on a work day and where do they get away with wearing ugg boots to work? Clearly I need to figure out how to get a job in that sector, if you can afford all that and have the time to go enjoy it.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 04:11 AM
14

I was always under the assumption it was Mexico through central america that counted under "hispanic" or even south american for the really geographically challenged, but not including actual spaniards fron europe.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 04:07 AM
14

I heard this story on Facebook earlier, but it was shown as a racist beating saying she yelled at him to go back to his country and shit like that. Power of propoganda is fucking absurd.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 03:22 AM
1

Tried to look at this but OP's link isn't working. Anyone got another?
/r/MensRights10/07/18 03:19 AM
4

Sadly I don't see feminists letting that happen. The left is their turf and I don't see them sharing with men willingly
/r/MensRights10/07/18 03:13 AM
36

But I mean, isn't that part of gender dysmorphia (or however you properly spell it, I feel like that may be wrong)? So that wpuld be a mental health condition. Not to say people with mental health issues shouldn't have respect, but I don't think it should be treated as normal either.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 05:08 AM
2

Does it count as doxxing if they're a public figure (such as a college professor) so long as you aren't sharing personal contact info, ie home address, personal email, non work phone numbers?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 04:44 PM
1

If they would get rid of identity politics they would draw in a lot of moderates as well. But I'll have nothing to do with leftist america and that identity politics bullshit game of blame the white man for everything.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 01:11 PM
1

If we could financially, I would probably be a stay at home dad. My wife can't handle the kids non stop and gets spazzy and needs the change of pace/scenery work offers. I would love the slower pace, spending more time with the kids, especially if I weren't hurting and exhausted from working my ass off in the heat or cold every day.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:21 PM
1

I mean, there used to be a plant that was a natural birth control. The Romans fucked it into extinction.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:06 PM
1

Nevermind, you clearly lack comprehension and critical though to see how I tied the comment to feminism and what has been happening on this sub lately to show the parallel in behavior between feminism and what I have seen on here lately, which is an attack on the nuclear family (which ties back into the comment I was replying to, coming full circle.) Get the fuck outta here with your attempt to shame me for something you just didn't understand.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:26 AM
1

Well feminism also led to the 2nd part in my opinion. Mass joining of women into the work force essentially doubled the labor pool without doubling the jobs, at a time when technology boom led to jobs that used to take a team being done by 1-2 people. It all played into stagnanting wages.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:03 AM
1

It was in regard to the person I responded to talking about feminist attacking the nuclear family and marriage. The same has been happening on this sub. Response was on topic for what I responded to.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:00 AM
1

I used to see that, trend has shifted over the past 6 months or so from what I've seen
/r/MensRights21/05/18 12:55 AM
2

No, I said that if men were without hope for their future they would eventually revolt. That could be violent, and I think to a degree likely would be. I never argued that women shouldn't be able to choose their partners, I argued the monogomy benefits society as a whole - including women. They're free to choose from avaliable men in a monogomous society. They do it all the time in the one we currently have. I don't want to control them nor men. I want them to have a mutually beneficial society.…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:43 PM
1

I've already said I don't know what ypu're calling concern trolling. Its not a phrase I use or am familar with. What I said about this sub is not completely false by any means though. Not only from my experience but what I've seen happen yo other users. So yes, it was devoid of facts.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:30 PM
3

A child having input from school is fine, but lets remember who is responsible for the kids - their parents. Not school. The parents should have as much responsibility and input in raising their children as the government. Unless you want the next generation to be brainwashed feminists, because leaving them in the care of the government funded schools will get you that result.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:28 PM
-7

What has he done, other than go off on a tangent personally attacking me for having an opinion, devoid of fact or reality you mean? Well by doing that he made any productive and reasonable conversation impossible while claiming I did it. What more does he need to do, shoot me in the fucking street? People like him have started attacking people not ideas. It makes productive discussion impossible. Supporting something that women benefit from isn't being "more concerned with women than men" if you…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:26 PM
5

This doesn't benefit kids. This benefits corporations. Having both parents working full time just means kids aren't getting to spend as much time with EITHER of their parents. It is giving up child rearing to the state (schools) in exchange for material possessions that kids don't need anyway.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:19 PM
3

No its not. The only men I've seen spend more time with their kids than the nuclear family model is single dads, which are still pretty rare, and even they don't always as they tend work more than many men in a 2 income nuclear household to pay the bills alone. Divorced men tend to see their kids less than their dogs. Men who had kids and never married are usually in the same boat as divorced dads. Nothing consistently offers you better access and more time with your children than a nuclear fami…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:17 PM
8

You are disconnected from reality. Enjoy your fantasy land where you only hear what you want and don't understand reasoning, logic, or context. Please do us all a favor and go to a psychologist so they get you some help, especially since you're in possession of a gun. People like you are what gives the responsible gun owners a bad name when you eventually snap.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:12 PM
1

Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be getting shut down. They're letting them run rampant. There's exposure to different ideas, and then there's ideologic cancer. They're the latter, an illness that will kill this movement.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:08 PM
-14

I'm no feminist and you have no fucking clue what you're on about. What the fuck is a concern troll? I'm not being concerned about women if that's what you're implying. I'm concerned with the direction this movement has gone due to people like you. If thats whatbit means then paint me guilty I guess, I don't really give a fuck what your opinion of me is. I never said don't have conversation. There used to be a lot of it on this sub. But it was about how to achieve goals, not tearing down other m…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 06:05 PM
1

No, advocating against the nuclear family is thoigh. It's exactly what women do because they claim it oppresses them. Men claiming it doesn't benefit them is the other side of the same coin.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 05:59 PM
6

Our society has developed in a way that for most families under 50 both parents are working full time. Which is detrimental to the kids, since most of them are being raised by their schools rather than their parents. That's not specifically a men or women's issue, but both all of us. And one we should be working together to solve. But until we can do away with the left weaponizing women with feminism for votes there's no chance of that.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 05:57 PM
2

It's also not about being feminism for men.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 05:53 PM
7

You said "if two people have a child they can't afford that child needs to suffer" BEFORE suggesting sterilozation as a possibility. You specifically said the children should suffer for their parents deeds. You are now saying self defense. You did not phrase it in that light. You were talking about putting down frustrated young men instead of helping them. Know who else talks like that? Femnazis. I'm fine with self defense, I'm a gun owner and huge advocate myself, but I also support training an…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 05:27 PM
9

Yes, lets just abuse/neglect children because their parents made a decision they had no choice in and start shooting our young men for being frustrated with society. What a fucking incredibly stupid idea. Talk about dangerous thinking. Lets do this the dumbest fucking way possible because that's easier for you. Talk about entitlement.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:32 PM
8

Oh shit, I didn't know they had shut it down. That explains a lot. That's the problem with them shutting down havens like that. They self segregated. Before at least we knew where they were and could more easily identify them. To someone not familiar with the MRM to come here and see thid place the past few months, I couldn't blame them for their misconceptions.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:27 PM
2

Not immediately. It will take a few generations for the taboo to drop, just look at the shift in the US as religion has become less important and secular ideas have risen. Tattoos and piercing have become normal. Look at the rise in interracial couples a just a few generations removed from the civil rights movement. It may not reach 80%, but if it was even 40% that could be disasterous to our society as we know it.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:25 PM
-6

This sub has gotten nearly as bad in the past 6 months or so. Saying anything pro-family is perceived as anti-men (because it's not anti-women) and you're treated like the enemy. When I first started coming here this place didn't hate women and supported men and women working together for functional society. Lately it seems the anger has grown out of control and it's getting overrun with incel/mgtow types who are as against the nuclear family as feminist. I'm holding out hope the mods will start…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:05 PM
1

Look at my original post. I never said I would be concerned about getting the money. Other people assumed that. What was described in the original picture though sounds like a marriage in every way but having the piece of paper, which from my standpoint, is why common law marriage is a thing. 8 years is a lot of time to invest in a person, in the relationship and building a life together. If someone purposefully did things that negatively impacted your quality of life - like lying to you for 8 y…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 05:15 PM
3

Something important to not overlook here: video games adapted into movies typically do not perform exceptionally well. Even the very popular AAA games. So part of this could not only be failing to appeal to the audience you want in women but to a wider audience that just doesn't watch video game based films much.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:10 PM
1

I think the success of Deadpool shows that there is definitelty an audience for non-pc or even counter PC movies.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:01 PM
3

Idris Elba might make me go watch a Bond for the first time since the Casino Royale reboot.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:55 PM
1

I'll watch the new one, but when its on like Netflix or Amazon Prime. I'm interested in it, and think she was a great fit to look the part of the new style Croft. This has more to do with the trouble of finding a babysitter for twin 3 year olds than desire to see it though. Same reason I haven't seen the new Avengers and we're currently trying to find one so we can go see the new Deadpool
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:49 PM
1

It's absolutely life changing. If you're denying that then you're forcing a disconnect from reality to fit your world view.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:33 PM
1

I understand the concept just fine. How do you know that she isn't holding herself out as married? There's not enough info to makr tgat determination, but rsther what informatuon is provided indicates a long term relationship with cohabitation, or marriage without the piece of paper.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:32 PM
1

That's not what I said, but thanks fot putting words in my mouth. If thats what you took from it then I don't see any point in wasting more time on this with you, since you're seeing what you want and not the point I'm making.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:13 PM
-1

If you still don't understand it, do yourself a favor and go MGTOW and don't have kids. Your significant other, especially one you've been with long enough that you're living together, deserves your honesty and trust. Rather it's about diseases or finances, its the same. The principle is the same. Otherwise what you have is a fuck buddy roomate, not a girlfriend or wife, not a relationship, and you need to be clear and keep those boundaries.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:21 PM
1

Calling it a violation of human rights is a pretty big leap. I know not all states still have it, but it is still a very good point of reference to realize how long 8 years with someone really is.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:07 PM
1

That's not what I said. However, there are some ideas that are pretty central to the concept of what marriage is. What he's doing would betray that.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:17 PM
1

It's a fair comparison in that both are massive life changing situations which should not be hid from your partner. Not equality of outcome, equality of principle. One would be a massive change for the better and one for the worse, which is why I picked it as the comparison. To illustrate that doing it with a negative outcome would not be okay, and if you maintain concistency in principles, it is not okay to do it when it would be a positive outcome either.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:11 PM
1

It said it was an investment account. I can only go off the information avaliable. It may have existed before her. If so, he should have told her before 8 fucking years. Go that long in a relationahip and don't disclose something and you're hiding it which is no different than lying about it. Also I've covered that 8 years is long enough to qualify for common law in a lot of places. I'm tired of repeating it. 8 years and you are building a life together. Regardless of what your tax filing status…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:07 PM
0

I've already covered that an 8 year relationship wpuld qualify for common law marriage in most places where it still exists. That's long enough that you are builsi g a life together. So take your caps lock and go sit down.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:01 PM
-2

That's not how marriage works - well, not how its supposed to. People like you thinking this is okay is probably why the divorce rate is sky high. When you build a life together it's not mine and hers its ours. It's we. We become one team working together. When you break that bond and that trust, you are being dishonest to your partner. No ifs ands or buts or excuses about why. You trust them or you don't. If you don't then one of the core values a relationship needs to be built on is missing. S…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:40 AM
-3

If you're together 8 years and living together, you're building a life and home together. Just because you're not married on a piece of paper doesn't mean your not living like a married couple. There's no way you spin this by singling out that he's the just the boyfriend instead of husband to make me believe his behavior is justified. I would see it the same way regardless of the offender's gender as well obviously. I do think it's fair in comparison. That kind of money would be more life changi…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:40 AM
-4

If it was a significant sum like this? Yes. It would be like saying you have an illness and not disclosing that it's AIDS to your sexual partner. Half truths are still half lies. If it wasn't a sig ificant amount, and she told me but didn't make a big deal out odnit, I would assume it was like a retirement fund or something, for comparison.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:19 AM
-6

I'll say this: 8 years is a long time. Long enough to qualify for common law marriage in a lot of places where it's applicable. If my wife hid massive amounts of money from me like that for 8 years the odds are pretty damn high we would be divorced. Not over the money. Over the dishonesty and broken trust. Damn the money, the respect and trust being broken like that would be hard to recover from.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:05 AM
5

I come from the south and know some men who might fall into this, but I think you've phrased it in a terriboy negative light unfairly. The ones I know like this are very traditional, they believe their role is to work and provide and protect, and that a woman's is to take care of the homefront. House care, child raising, etc. I'm not saying it's right or wrong - that is going to be up to the individual couple and their beliefs and what works for them. Just that it should be fairly expressed.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:53 AM
3

Eight years. If thats time lived together couldn't common law marriage apply in some states?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:41 AM
2

I know several women in the 45-55 age range who once identified as feminist and are now sickened by it. They all say this isn't my feminism, this isn't what we fought for. They feel like they do have equality of opportunity (and soke advantages just as they feel men have some, and that the inherent differences in us cause that and its not a bad thing). We need those women to speak up and guide their daughters away from the man hating ways of current society. We can fight to fix things and bring …
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:34 AM
1

Unfortunately a lot of people have tried to paint this sub the way you just described The_Donald and would react the same way to it. Simply because they don't actually know what the sub is really about and just take it at face value when feminist infested publications claim it as a hate group.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:26 AM
1

How so? Women would choose mates on other factors if we all had the same economical status. Money/economic security and lifestyle would not be the leading factor. I wager that you would then see choices of mate picked on 1) physical attraction followed by 2) personal compatibility. In other words, the two things men usually base their selection on as opposed to what a woman offers economically. You would also likely see a decline in divorce rates as people would make better choices about who the…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:17 AM
2

Your old boss believed in actual capitalism, where you reap what you sew, not a fraction of what you sew while 1-2% of the population amasses absurd wealth by profitting in huge margins on the working class. My company charges between 4-5 times what I make hourly for what I do. I'm jot saying they shouldn't make any profit, but 4 fucking times what I do for actually doing the work? That's fucking absurd. They call what we have capitalism, but I don't believe that is what it is anymore. I see som…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:54 AM
1

I mean, the similarities it shares with a cult aren't even subtle.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:29 AM
1

I mean you can't really expect to get the truth out of people while recording them. They will be reserved and not speak their mind fully. Also interviewing multiple people at once leads to group bias, even if it's just two.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 08:30 PM
2

Which is such an absurd idea. The exact opposite of what they need. Their extreme work culture is detrimental to personal life, which includes relationships and child raising.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:59 PM
5

But it implies people who ackknowledge false accusations are now a big enough part of his base to pander to... which means its growing
/r/MensRights05/05/18 03:15 PM
2

I've heard their ads for about 6 months in Arkansas now, but don't know anyome who has used them yet. They market here as a law firm focused on representing men in divorce though, the only law firm I've ever heard do that.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 02:54 PM
23

Ask how tall she is, anything under "above average" height -> "sorry I don't date dwarves or hobbits." Same thing they do to men
/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:03 AM
2

I mean, this trend is nothing new. When a job is valuable to employees, ie requires employers to offer good wages and benefits, compete for the best employees, rather than potential employees fighting over a job - which reduces their negotiating power - then the employers are going to do everything possible to flood the market with more potential employees to drive down labor cost. Happens in nearly every industry at some point if they go unchecked by government. It's sad and sickening to see th…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:09 AM
2

I used to work with a lesbian who was rather conservative as is her wife (I mean not super surprising given where we're from.) by LGBT community standards also. She said they didn't really want to be involved with the community because they would give them shit for not going to marches and parades and being eccentric/flamboyant to the point of raunchy. It was really sad to hear that an already small community was treating them that way. She was like damn all I want to do is go to work, go home a…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:51 AM
1

To be honest I looked at this and cringed. Not because of the idea that a man can have goals and expectations, but that the list of wants is as cringe worthy as the ones most women have. Men constantly talk about their unreal expectations of men. I don't think the way to fix that is to also be unreal ourselves. A relationship built to last should not be soley about status. You want to know why we have so many divorces and families ripped apart, look no further than basing your family on superfic…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:30 PM
2

Oh for sure. It was just a semi-related note regarding him broadly rather than this particular idea. On this idea, I tend to agree with him
/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:12 AM
6

Nietche also proposes a lot of nonsense. He's pretty hit or miss.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 09:27 PM
1

Marriage laws are fine. Divorce laws are whats fucked up.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 02:15 PM
2

I don't see where you've proven anything, but whatever, I've wasted too much time on this already.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:28 PM
2

I heard about this briefly recently, didn't know who he was though, thanks for the references. Is it distasteful? Sure probably to some, particularly the overly sensitive or with shit for a sense of humor. Does that matter? Not in the fucking least. Free speech only really needs to be protected when someone is saying things others don't like.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:14 PM
1

I don't know what all control factors have or haven't been used in the past, just that the results have consistently shown the most benefit from and to the standard family model. I really don't have the time to go hunt them up and analyze them, but if you want to in an attempt to prove your point then be my guest.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:06 PM
1

Well first, look at the elderly or people with health problems/injuries/disabilities where sex isn't an option or is greatly reduced. Look at people with low libido, rather naturally occuring or environmentally produced (vis trauma or side effect of medicine, etc). Also people who just don't see sex as a top factor in a relationship, because you can get sex without one, meaning for a relationship they prioritize other factors ahead of it. This will add up to a not insignificant number of people.…
/r/MensRights24/03/18 11:03 PM
5

Not familiar with count dankula, but this is kind of amusing to me as a baker.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 08:00 PM
2

You can posit it on a micro level, not to show that it has a positive influence on society as a whole.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 07:21 PM
2

Well that video goes off on a tangent from the conversation, but yes we agree to disagree. That video is basically propoganda for a male version of modern day feminism. I'll skip on drinking that koolaid. I'm not saying it doesn't make some good points, it does, like the fact that men and women love differently. However it chooses to turn that into an entirely negative thing, to use it to attack women. I disagree with those conclusions. I'm not out to tear down women, I'm not the male version of…
/r/MensRights24/03/18 07:19 PM
1

By talking to people. Friends, family, coworkers, etc. Especially people I've known for many years. Observing a shift in their attitude towards men's treatment.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:40 PM
2

I don't think I would go that far. People don't notice many things until it impacts them psrsonally. People are generally too busy to be worried about other people's business. Plus being raised that being nosey and in someone else's business is bad behavior. I wouldn't say that is the same as lack of compassion or morals.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:37 PM
3

It's not important to everyone. Different people different needs. The problem is like I said, poor decision making in finding someone who meets their needs. Not the insitution itself.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:34 PM
2

Okay so where is your support for this? Look at studies, they consistently show that the nuclear family is the most beneficial.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:31 PM
2

I mean, I'm not ready to start knocking the institution of marriage yet. A strong presence of the family unit is good for society, kids, the future. What I will knock is poor decision making in selecting partners and failure to communicate and plan for life before getting married, and this applies to men and women. Too many people are scared of being alone and make poor life long choices in trying to avoid it. Men do stand to lose far more in the event of a failed marriage though, without doubt.…
/r/MensRights24/03/18 04:11 AM
18

I've come across an increasing number of ~70s era feminist who no longer will identify as feminist and denounce the behavior of this generation of feminism. They will straight out tell you it should never be about hating men, tearing men down, treating men like trash, or blaming men as the source of all problems, but about building women up so they no longer want any part of it as it has no elements of that left. They're becoming disgusted by how their husbands, sons, and grandkids are being tre…
/r/MensRights24/03/18 04:04 AM
0

Very much this, or the expectation that men should be mechanics, plumbers, electricians, tech gurus, pretty much a one stop shop for fixing everything at any time. What's worse though is the other men who reinforce these stupid ass stereotypes as some form of dick measuring. Obligatory acknowledgement that not all women do this, but the type of women who would complain about male incompetence are the kind who would fall in this category.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:54 AM
2

I actually saw one of the more outspoken #metoo type people on my Facebook feed calling her out over this recently. I was pleasantly (very) surprised. But that was one person out of a slew of that group.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:32 AM
1

"How many rapes is acceptable per instance of a guilty rapist being set free under the "better to have X offenders go free than one innocent person be imprisoned" philosophy? Put differently, in order to ensure that not a single innocent person is imprisoned, how many rapes would be acceptable in order to ensure that outcome?" Based on our innocent until proven guilty structure, as many as it takes. What should be happening is not to risk convicting innocents, but to become better at proving rap…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:38 PM
2

Home school. It's not just for crazy bible thumpers or cultists, that crazy BS propoganda was just to help put butts in desks so schools could get paid for it.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:24 PM
1

Where do you people live that welding is a profitable job? Where I am that is like a $10-12/hr job.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:12 PM
3

I think they have the high ground, our society was established with the idea that getting away with a crime is better than imprisoning innocents. Your stance would alter the judicial fabric of our society, not just on rape and murder cases. It would set judicial precident that would be applied to other situations also.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:52 AM
2

Our legal system is flawed now from how it was designed, you're right there, but rather than accept this and use it to further deteriorate our rights, we should be pissed off at the idea that a strip search in an airport would be acceptable at all. The idea that it's okay to give up rights in exchange for comfort is pretty much the opposite of the ideals the US was founded on.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:39 AM
1

I'm on a 5 also, but I think 5c, 10.3.3, doesn't work. Edit: just point to say, may be a new software version feature
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:54 AM
7

Two male police offers were demoted after a female coworker accused them of sexual harassment. AFTER one of the male officers had reported her and she had been fired for sexually harassing the two men. Thankfully these guys are standing up for themselves and fighting it, including witness statements contradicting her story and it appears there may be video recording local city authorities are getting to review. Reddit kept giving me an error while trying to add the condensed version to the topic…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:16 AM
14

Sarcasm can be hard to express through text, especially when you don't go over the top with it. An example being your home schooled comment. I want to assume that is sarcasm because some of the most succesful people I know were home schooled and they had a better education than most coming out of public schools (relative to their geographic area), but the comment actually reads in a serious tone to me, given the rest of the content.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:53 AM
2

No I don't think so, but I imagine in local circles his name is known. I'm sure the false accuser spread it around.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:24 PM
1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/identity https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/politics I didn't post them because the dictionary is easy to find. I've sent you messages saying READ THE OTHER MESSAGES IN THE THREAD WHERE THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN DONE. Jesus fucking christ. It was one of the first replies I had, that I had already explained in the thread my answers to the questions you were asking. I don't owe it to you to repeat myself, defend myself, or explain myself. That doesn't…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:10 AM
12

That's all? I feel like that compensation is short changing him heftily, considering the damage done to his reputation, job prospects, and chances with other academic insitutions meerly by being accused. Not to mention court costs and lawyer fees...
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:51 AM
1

Look, believe what you want. The words are defined and you're trying to redefine them to fit your view. Go tell the dictionary it's wrong. I'm done wasting time, there obviously won't be a consensus here.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 12:33 AM
1

You're purposefully being pedantic now, and incorrect while doing so. MRA does have identity politics. It is a movement seeking political change for a certain group of individuals. Being identity political alone isn't enough to make a movement bad. The manner in which they conduct themselves in that pursuit is what makes them bad. I've never said the alt-right is currently a good movement. I said it's a growing one and that isn't surprising. I've said what I think it has the potential to be. I n…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 05:47 PM
1

We're in similar boats but in opposite sides. My guy lost in primaries. I didn't really like Trump for president, but Hillary was probably the one person in America that was harder to like than him, and with a ton of baggage to make it easy to not trust her (I still think she's fucking crooked and feel like she's using her remaining influence to power the Mueller investigation.) If Bernie had won the DNC I would have voted liberal for the first time most likely. He had a lot of stuff I disagree …
/r/MensRights05/02/18 01:29 PM
1

Absolutely. There is no argument to be made that they did not start out in identity politics. Of the 3 groups, 2 of them have identity politics tied to their names BLACK lives matter, FEMinist. Their entire purpose is tied to their identity politics. BLM just rose up within the past few years, it's not like it's some 200 year old movement whose true origin was lost to history or anything. I'm not saying the alt-right doesn't have roots in identity politics. I never denied that they do. In my oth…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 01:17 PM
3

Oh I completely get that. They have a long way to go before I'll associate with them, until the associations with hate groups are broken, but just being male, white, and more socially conservative, I get associated with them by default even if it's not true. I think the same happens for a lot of people. People got tired of saying "I'm not a racist just because I believe in following our laws." And started saying "fuck it i don't care if you think I'm racist." and embraced it. I think since that …
/r/MensRights05/02/18 02:18 AM
2

Identity politics is EXACTLY the foundation of BLM and feminism. Get the fuck outta here with that left wing propoganda bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 01:59 AM
1

You didn't read the original post where I said it would become like BLM or feminist, I never said it would be perfect or not identity politics. So you're going on a fucking rant for a tangent issue that was never denied.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 10:36 PM
2

I do agree though 100% both sides should experience the same scrutiny to their actions. I mean the republican economic stance is a nightmare. And we should be able to call that out without being a "liberal sjw snowflake" just like we should be able to talk about immigration reform without being "racist xenophobe bigot"
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:59 PM
9

Well you provide me with a good example here - calling them xenophobes. Some on the most extreme end of the scale may be truly xenophobic, but the vast majority are tired of being called racist and bigot because they want to enforce our immigration laws. We already fight being underpaid, and it's an even bigger fight when they can hire illgals under the table for a fraction of the price. This is a real issue in a lot of southern states close to the border. It may seem like an asinine overexagger…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:51 PM
5

I still use my hotmail email account from before google was really a big thing. I've had that email for over half of my life.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:56 PM
5

Like I said elsewhere, I think the alt-right is an infant movement. It's associated with the hate movements because that's currently the outlet they have to have a voice, but I think it will grow and leave the hate groups behind as it matures. Remember, the MRA is still fighting things like feminist propoganda to associate them with hate movements. It's going to be even harder for a movement that also has a racial component. These things take time. We'll see how it plays out.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:55 PM
9

I don't necessarily agree with your assessment of the alt-right, that seems very much like an assessment made by liberal media, not one grounded in reality. You can't associate alt-right purely with republicans. A lot of people would consider me alt-right because of my social views(ie tired of being demonized for being a white male), yet I don't share repliblican views on many other issues (honestly don't care one way or the other about gay issues- I'm fine with equal treatment, not special trea…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:48 PM
1

I feel like that varies by industry. I don't want to go in a hardware store and ask a guy who looks like he's never seen a day's hard work where to find the parts I need, but I don't want to go to a bank and ask for a loan from someone who looks like they live in their parent's basement.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:25 PM
41

Well the accepting part is because the movement isn't just a response to male issues, but white male issues in particular. It's what separates the alt right movement from the MRA movement. It has a lot of overlap because in the US white people still happen to be the largest race demographic by far. But yes, call someone racist enough times and they won't give a fuck if they actually are racist anymore. For one the accusation loses any meaning or validity, and for two they've been dehumanized to …
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:03 PM
-1

I figured it was the most likely candidate sadly
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:52 PM
1

I live one state south of you, according to the state you mentioned in a previous post. I see plenty of them. Most of them are straight laced. They dress more casual than office wokers, generally jeans and a polo or button up, but not in V necks with skinny jeans and sneakers that don't match with a weird beanbag hat. Which is how hipsters here dress.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:48 PM
6

"calls the #MeToo movement “a frenzied extrajudicial warlock hunt that does not pause to parse the difference between rape and stupidity” and “a classic moral panic, one that is ultimately as dangerous to women as to men.” I hope the history books will look on this like the Inquisition or the Salem witch hunts. Because that's exactly what it is, it just hasn't quite reached that scale yet, but not for lack of trying on their part.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:43 PM
1

Lutheran and baptist and they're hipster? Yeah, you live in a bubble. Edit: also teachers wearing shorts? coaches and PE teachers maybe. A kilt is a cultural garb, which falls under exceptions to the standard rules.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:29 PM
1

It's not an invitation to touch someone, but it is certainly putting a message out that you want to be approached/desired. If you wear a cop's uniform you can't be fucked up when people run up asking for help. So if you dress like a whore don't be fucked up when you get propositioned.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:23 PM
2

Until they want that particular man to be interested, then it's for men. But as far as the rest of us peasants are concerned, its for themselves.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:21 PM
2

Dave Chapelle's skit on the whore's uniform is great.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:20 PM
34

I can't decide if this is the start of Army of Darkness, 1984, or one of those true crime type tv shows, but about his suicide. All depends on what tone you read it with.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:56 PM
11

Freshly baked pies Fuck that, cooking is for everyone. Many of the top chefs in the world are men. I don't know how they stole cooking as a "woman" thing to be offended by it, but cooking is a human thing, we all have to eat.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:53 PM
2

My mom would definitely fit the RBN bill, and his description is pretty spot on with their behavior.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:41 PM
4

Seen this before but still love it.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:33 PM
34

I hate that google is so engrained in everything now. They've bought so many smaller things that I don't think I'd be able to fully disconnect from them if I wanted to. It'd be like trying to get Johnson&Johnson out of our household supplies.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:13 PM
186

They wonder why the alt-right is seeing a revival, but are too stupid to see this is why. It's not about reviving nazis or the kkk or aryan brotherhood or any of that shit, it's the beginning of a new movement spawning from the old. It will eventually be the white BLM or feminism or whatever PC culture shit is going on. White people, white men in particular, are getting fed up with decades of this "you're the one to blame for everything" shit. They're starting to fight back.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:10 PM
94

Oh man, I love the asking is an aggression thing. So they jump off the deep end of reality, ask people to respect it, then won't explain what they're dealing with because it "triggers" them. What an amazing way to never get called on your bullshit without making the one with some common sense the bad guy.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:03 PM
2

Their height may very well make some women not want to sleep with them. Not all, it is a generalization statement. At least not as a first choice, but they may be acceptable as a 4th or 5th choice. The same can be said for men not wanting to sleep with super tall aka "amazon" women. Not that they won't but that generally they won't be the first round draft pick.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:47 AM
2

I have before, yes. Sex appeal isn't the only factor in a relationship.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:39 AM
6

Would 4'9 make you a dwarf king? I'm not sure where the height cutoff for that is.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:36 AM
1

Most of our customers are repeat customers within a small industry, so I've dealt with them across multiple exchanges over the past few years. If I worked in large retail like WalMart or Amazon I would agree, that would be a leap.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 10:08 PM
2

I would immediately assume a statement opened like that is going to be followed with some form of irony, satire, or a joke.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:48 PM
15

Foreigners see real victims, American women don't realize how spoiled they are.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:19 PM
1

Alternatives like money, good references for strong work ethic, and instilling a sense of pride in your work. I work had to do a good job because of 1) money. You pay them enough to care. We don't do that currently and 2) my name is attached to that work, and that matters to me. Not for the company or customer. I think 60% or more of our customers are fucking idiots and I hate them. I still do my job and do it well. I know that because of that I can get good references, have job security, etc. Y…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:35 PM
1

Sadly the obedience is education bullshit is an epedimic in our society, not just with feminism. Many work places don't want thinkers, they want yes man drones. Universities don't want to promote free thought any longer, they want to promote their PC approved ideologies. Older generations don't want "rude" disobedient children (which is what they often call anyone who disagrees with them.) Obedience is Education and the Cult of Positivity are hurting our society, fueling not just ideologies like…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:32 AM
3

I hope they enter that shit into the court. "Man fired for saying this, then CEOs echo sentiment." Will look real good for google I'm sure.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:12 AM
5

Wow, whoever wrote this garbage has no business in any sort of journalism, even the op-ed column. Also the whole article is basically "this isn't the answer we want, so you're bad CEOs". Suck it up buttercup, at the end of the day these people are running businesses that answer to shareholders who expect profits, and don't accept warm and fuzzy diversity stories in their place. They gave real answers - these are viewed as nerdy man fields, things most women don't want to be associated with since…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:10 AM
9

A victim of stupidity.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 07:00 AM
6

Every time this gets said I'm like okay come on with it then by all means. I want to hand over the keys. Then when they see they don't have a fucking clue what they're really asking for maybe they'll drop this bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:41 AM
15

Jesus fucking christ, some people infuriate me. A little kid had a fit and flailed and hit you on accident? Welcome to parenting you dumb motherfucker! Especially an orphan kid who didn't have discipline and boundaries set as a toddler. He never learned to behave most likely. That said, mixing a kid of those conditions in with infants and only one set of hands to meet their needs was a bad idea from the start. It's especially hard with 2 infants (twins are... challenging to put it nicely.) Anyon…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:35 AM
2

He may not be the best example. That dude rolled a natural 20 in Charisma, enough to overcome his looks for sure.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:19 AM
3

I have a supervisor who is a complete jackass. He used to give me problems constantly trying to get into a dick measuring contest. Best guess was because I came in learned fast and worked hard to be good at my job. Eventually I took over the department and he got a promotion out of it (had to justify keeping his lazy no work doing ass I guess?) So I see him less since then thankfully. Was no secret I had problems out of him constantly to the point other coworkers noticed and commented on it. Fas…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:13 AM
2

Any friends I have to went into law enforcement are no longer friends, they immediately showed that they were untrustoworthy with their choice of profession.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:14 AM
1

One very important thing about searches, entering your home, etc: I need your warrant.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:11 AM
4

Pro tip 1: never trust the fucking police. Pro tip 2: lawyer up even if you're innocent. Keep your fucking mouth closed without one present, as they'll try to twist ANYTHING to fit their narrative. I've seen very few morally bankrupt professions that match law enforcement. If you need to break the law to enforce the law, you need to reevaluate the fucking law. If you can lie, deceive, manipulate, sleep deprive, psychologically abuse/torture someone, twist their words to fit a false narrative jus…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:08 AM
3

I mean, I don't feel like this is news to most men, but science supporting it is nice. My feeling was always that it's a sign of bad character in women to do this. It's like being too lazy to work, so you steal because it's easier. Let someone else do all the work then swoop in.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:47 AM
1

When my now wife first moved here girls from high school that I hadn't seen in like 5 years or more would come up to her at her job and make snarky comments like "oh YOU'RE the one with Hannyu?" There was a second wave of it shortly after we got married and she took my last name as more people realized. She would tell me stories about it and I'm just like I don't even know who the fuck that is, but apparently they know me? Edit: also absolutely not giving them attention. When they see that you h…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:37 AM
3

It feels that way because it IS that way and I say this as a generalization know it's not universal
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:32 AM
3

This is where I want to see equality. Work life balance for men. There's no reason in a modern society we shouldn't be able to figure out a way for both mom and dad to be able to have a presence in a kid's life, not mom raising them while dad serves as a breathing ATM. Not only would it benefit men, it would benefit the kids and the future of our world because of the benefits to the kids.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:21 AM
2

The real answer right here.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:18 AM
3

I'd just like to say that if your life's in a place where suicide is better than going on a date with an overweight woman, you're either in a really good place or a really bad one. Hopefully the former.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:15 AM
5

This reminds me of a thought I had the other day: women who want to put in the work for equality don't need feminism because they're too busy doing something with their lives.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:10 AM
2

I didn't really read this as fat acceptance. I read it as even being in shape, most guys aren't going to look like The Rock or Will Smith. You can be in great shape and be ugly. Likewise, most women will never look like Gal Gadot or Scarlet Johanson.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:06 AM
1

Tell him the truth about who Sheeran's fan base is? That actions say more than words - they can say what they want, but they're still listening to the music, watching the movies, etc.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:46 AM
1

Oh absolutely. The other is fun to go along with as a bit tongue in cheek about how they act or would act, but there's definitely a line where I go call the cops if you want over nothing and enjoy the trouble of filing a false report, but if you touch a hair on their heads I will end you.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:24 PM
1

I dkn't know, I think the lack of tact is what makes him fun. Tact is another way to say boring ass politician speak. He got voted in because he wasn't that.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:10 PM
2

I love Amiri King, dude is savage to anyone.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 10:54 PM
2

Really, the 2017 population estimate for the entire country was 325 million, but 311 million of them are women?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:11 AM
2

It's a lot more than 1%. You don't get a million woman march of people in pussy hats with 1%.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:32 PM
2

If so it was not well conveyed as parody.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:32 PM
2

I agree, sometimes he needs to just put Twitter down, but I also see where the media has gone full left wing agenda, there's no truly unbiased news anymore and social media is a great platform to get your message out directly.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:21 PM
5

You can be introverted and be a good manager. Being introverted doesn't mean you can't interact with people as needed, it just means it's mentally exhaustin, where as for an ectrovert things like golding with the boss is more likely to rebuild their energy reserves, not drain them. As for rather it is about work or should be, my experience is that varies from work place to work place, but there seem to be more places where knowing the right people matters more than work ability.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:32 PM
2

You can discuss the two independently. Not all people in group A are necessarily part of group B. That's basic logic. Also, I'm not using anti-capitalist talking points. I'm using my own talking points. My stance has repeatedly been balance, not socialism or anti-capitalism.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:05 PM
6

The feminist movement has chnged from the 70s, it's not what it was for our parents generation. Stop denying that your movement has been taken over and is no longer an equality movement and hasn't been in over 30 years.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:55 PM
2

Well first, the fuck does feminism have to do with what I pointed out? which is that there is a difference in anti-capitalist and anti-oligarchy/plutocracy. I'm not feminist, I don't support their movement, and I directly said I'm not anti-capitalist, I'm against corporations being the true powers in our country, not our republic of elected represenatives. They rarely stand for their consituents now, and are bought and paid for via the lobbyist system. I don't support businesses being a politica…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:53 PM
10

Job killing? I mean, you're probably right on the groping, but job killing is a hard sell. I'd also disagree with racist, but I don't subscribe to the modern view that anything less than kissing ass of minorities and walking on eggshells for their convenience is racist. Wanting to keep immigration legal isn't racist. Not giving special treatment to minorities isn't racist. Calling shithole countries shitholes isn't racist, it's just the truth. Haiti is a shithole, regardless of what color people…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:46 PM
5

I don't support the good ole boys network, which is what I call the whole golf/squash/sucking up thing (its the term i know it as from sports) It should be about your work, not about kissing ass or giving blow jobs. If someone is getting raises because they spend half the day brown nosing while I'm out there getting the work done, fuck them they're a piece of shit, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:41 PM
2

Anti-capitalist would be against any free trade, they would look for government control and regulation of all assets. It would be truly reflective of -984/Brave New World level government opprssion, intrusion, and oversight.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:17 PM
5

That's what they say, but it is most certainly not supported by their actions.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:12 PM
2

The lack of self awareness to what the world is vs what she apparently perceives is headache inducing.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:38 PM
25

I mean, no shit? This is consistent with what he's said all through his campaign and presidency. He has repeatedly negatively responded to questions about identity politics and claimed that he is for all (legal) Americans. He's crass and rough around the edges, but he has consistently been who he said he was. I don't know what is surprising about that to anyone at this point?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:10 PM
9

I think the thing here is that women CHOOSE to use sexuality to get ahead. They weren't REQUIRED to do so. They took the easy path, not the right path (hard work and merit). That to me is sufficient to not support a patriarchy. To me for it to be a patriarchy, sexual exploitation would have to be required, not optional. But so do men in some cases when they're able, they're just far less able to than women usually. I would say the bar for how attractive a man has to be to pull this off is far hi…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 04:55 PM
1

Speak for your goddamn self, pedo. Little kids aren't sexually appealing to normal people. I've reached a point where I tend to think 16-18 year old kids are like 12, damn sure not potential sexual partners.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 04:35 PM
9

This is a bad argument. It like the "teach men not to rape" argument. You can teach people not to kill, rape, or falsely accuse until you're blue in the face. Some motherfuckers are just scum who will do those things no matter what. You know what does stop rape and murder? A bullet to the face, a taser, whatever way you choose to defend yourself. Taking ownership of your own protection. It's the same for false accusations. Be aware. Take precautions not to put yourself in a compromised position …
/r/MensRights28/01/18 04:26 PM
4

Apparently Christianity isn't the only teligion taking a day of rest on Sunday
/r/MensRights28/01/18 04:16 PM
15

Oh man, I was taking this post seriously until I got to anarcho-voluntaryist. You do you, I've dealt with enough of your kind to know it's nothing but a capitalist cult. You proclaim capitalism will take us to the promised land, benefit the individual, have a meritocracy, when reality shows us that is not true. Then you go "this isn't REAL capitalism, it's crony capitalism!" Which is as stupid as the "not real socialism" argument. And it is what has happened with -every single one- of the so cal…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 04:15 PM
-22

The feminist movement in it's modern form is not a women's rights movement so much as a female superiority/anti-men movement. This post is here to show the difference in true feminist movement vs the anti-male movement prevalent in western feminism.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 04:04 PM
47

I think a lot of what gets called anti-capitalist isn't actually anti-capitalist, it's anti-oligarchy/anti-plutocracy, which is where unchecked capitalism can end up just like unchecked socialism can end up in opressive communism. Just feel that it's important to make this distinction. I'm not anti-capitalism, I'm anti-the bullshit we currently have where corporations are the ones with real power. Where money buys political power. Regardless of which political party is in power that shit stays t…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 03:54 PM
1

I don't think we have the same ideas of what would consitute a restart for sure. I'm not talking about the complete collapse of society, simply the degredation to the point that female superiority gets exposed as false and we get back to letting men do the things men do. I don't think societal collapse is necessary, just the collapse of the social power structure so that we can re-balance and move forward as equals.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 03:47 PM
9

My wife frequents that sub, tells me stories of the stupid fucks who post there. It's amazing to me that some of them don't forget to breathe, much less carry on anything resembling a relationship. As soon as she starts one of those stories I have to mentally prepare myself to increase my capacity for handling stupidity for the day.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:04 AM
1

The number of people who make emotional decisions and end up on juries is mind boggling. Half the arguments in TV show courts is emotional appeal, not law and logic and people just eat it up. Innocent until proven guilty is dead. Our justice system has become a farce.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:47 AM
5

It really is. I want a better world for my kids, but what I see now is that they will inherit one worse than us, which is worse than what my parents generation inherited. I don't know what to do to make it better except to restart.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 12:58 AM
12

Change will happen when female superiority is proven to fall on it's face. When men quit on society, quit being the work horses drivng it while being demonized. Quit caring about school, work, or having a family. This has already started to some degree. NEET culture, MGTOW, things like that. Of course they're hammered with horrible negative stereotypes, even by other men who don't realize what has led to them making those choices. Feminists are right about something - the future is female. Becau…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 06:34 PM
1

Yeah that's why I added the edit, once I saw it wasn't just him being charged
/r/MensRights27/01/18 06:21 PM
7

Wait this poor dude got charged? What a load of shit. Remember when this came out and cheering for him. Edit: nevermind apparently both caught charges. I'm okay with that, even though I don't really think this was press charges worthy,
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:30 AM
3

I thought common core math was bad, it looks like the gold standard next to feminist math.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:29 AM
1

"The global goals" fuck you and your new world order bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:25 AM
3

Report my kids fucking kidnapped or some shit
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:56 PM
8

In this situation, where he has been found innocent in several different investigations - even the kangaroo courts of the schools it sounds like - he should 100% be able to sue the hell out of her for defamation of character, pain and suffering, medical expenses due to this causing him depression and PTSD according to the interview, for potential loss of earnings, as it seems his issues have prevented him from finishing his studies and may precent him from getting jobs if potential employers lea…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:06 AM
41

White with white kids, I worry about shit like this constantly. I rarely will even take them to the restroom to change them because some crazy bitch will stare at me like I'm a predator. For changing my kids fucking diaper. I'm paranoid that one of them is going to be the crazy one who makes a scene over nothing and has me answering to cops over a diaper change.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:57 AM
1

I honestly didn't know if every place had bondsmen or if some places required posting full bail.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 05:16 AM
2

Definitely more so. I can at least understand how women get pulled into the cult of feminism.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:41 AM
1

I originally misread this as "any time in a past life" for some reason. Then just shook my head like yeah, I could see someone trying that shit "his past life raped me in my past life". And it doesn't even seem like a stretch for feminism to do that if they could figure out a way to make people believe in reincarnation.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:39 AM
2

Sounds like they need to go get their balls out of the jar feminism put them in and use them.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:34 AM
2

Why would men's rights get along with an ideology that acts like men are straight from the bowels of Satan? Not putting up with bullshit feminism everywhere and looking for a place to express thoughts as a man without being called nazi mysoginist cis white racist literally Hitler, whatever fucking buzz word is the flavor of the month, is exactly how I found men's rights. I realized I couldn't be the only one fed up with that shit. Then I found that men had been fighting this shit since before I …
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:20 AM
2

This is exactly what it's going to take. Women who care more about their male sons and spouses than female superiority.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:54 AM
2

Not sure about other places, but in Arkansas you can bond out for a fraction of the bail price. Basically if you show up and don't skip out on court and shit you're good, but if you try to skip out, they'll collect assets to cover the full amount. I got in trouble as a teen because a friend of mine broke into a store on a dare (not the smartest friend, but whatever) so when the dipshits that dared him told me (they didn't think he'd donit then freaked out when he did) I went in to get him out be…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:52 AM
0

It's sad that I have to ask, but /s?
/r/MensRights25/01/18 06:29 AM
15

This right here. I couldn't give a fuck if some SJW snowflake thinks I'm a "literally Hitler" nazi. I do care if it costs me my job, future job opportunity, etc that may hurt not only me but my family by extention.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 01:28 AM
6

I see a lot of "troll, fake, satire" etc in this thread. Go look at social media. You see shit like this posted and shared at an alarming rate. It's not satire or trolls, it's feminist brainwashing combined with ego. People love oversimplification and they love being right. These little catchy pictures make them feel justified and and superior about the feminist lies they have believed for years.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:17 PM
2

I'm fine with child support conceptually, but I will say in many cases it lacks oversight. When I see dads who split time and expenses with their ex in child care also pay a hefty child support payment struggle while she rocks high end clothes, new phones, expensive haircuts/dye jobs, manicures, etc, that suggests to me she's probably not spending that money on the kids appropriately. Unfortunately this is a situation that I see too often for comfort, at least in my anecdotal experience.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:33 AM
3

I really liked that he pointed this out: when women work full time, men put more into the home, which reduces their earnings (of course due to less dedication to work due to other responsibilities). For my generation, it's become common for both parents to work full time jobs to get by. I see very few people my age who have stay at home wives, and the ones who do are always talking about being poor and struggling financially, or receive some form of government assistance. So what I wonder then i…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:27 AM
1

See my other reply about this. It is a commonly misused word. I was trying to get clarity on rather the post I replied to was using it in it's correct form or incorrectly as a slang for psychopathy. The post didn't offer the context necessary to be sure. I don't care rather it was misused or used correctly, I just wanted to clarify OP's intended message.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:04 AM
1

I'm looking at it like this, to use your broken glass analogy: if no windows were broken, sure we wouldn't need to pay anyone to pick up glass, replace windows, such and so on, but reality is windows are going to get broken, people are going to be needed to deal with it. The only way that doesn't happen is to get rid of windows. So to me, an idea like the broken window fallacy can only exist in a vacuum. If you apply that idea to other concepts, you would eventually arrive at the conclusion that…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:59 AM
3

The way I saw it the DNC was the Clinton machine.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 02:08 AM
1

Congratulations, captain obvious. Now let me tell you something else obvious: It's a commonly misused word! I don't care if it was misused, I deal with people misuing words all the time, not a big deal, but it does matter when you need to clarify intent of what they intended to say. I was asking if it was misused because the post I responded to did not have the context to make me feel sure as to how it was intended.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 01:06 AM
1

Dismantling the GOBN (good ole boys network as I know it from sports, sure we can find a better name) is a great idea professionally as far as I'm concerned. Lets fucking operate on merit, not ass kissing and favors. We need no better example of what's wrong with that model than the US government. Favors, back door deals, lobbyists, and very little actual representation of the constituents.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 11:27 PM
17

I've developed a habit of repeating any conversations I have via phone in email at work, so that there is a record of it in 6 months long after I've forgotten and someone comes asking about it, I don't have an email that says "hey heres paperwork for the thing i called you about 5 minutes ago" instead I have one that has all relevant information avaliable.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:08 PM
5

THANK YOU! I don't hear other people say this often enough.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:05 PM
-3

Are you meaning psychotic as in psyhosis or psychopathy (now called ASPD or somethig like that for anti-social personailty disorder)? If the former, you're correct, if you mean the latter, not so much.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:01 PM
1

You see it as a net drain, I see it as someone who is able to provide for themselves by having a job. We aren't getting rid of government, or the people it employs, so being angry that we pay for the trash guy instead of congress' vacations is stupid. You can harp about the virtue of government jobs being necesary or not, doesn't changr reality, which is that they behaved poorly and possibly created jobs that were most likely to benefit men by doing so.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:08 PM
-6

A small part of me feels victory knowing they're generating jobs cleaning it up - jobs that most likely will be done by men.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:56 AM
1

I think you're mistaking OP's intent here. While it would focus in female victims, it would do so in a manner that is pro-woman rather than anti-male. This means creating a legitimate alternative to feminism, which is one of the largest groups opposing men's rights issues, despite what they say. So not only do you still give women an organized space for their issues (which they should have just like we have MRM groups like this one) but you do so in a way that deflates an anti-male ideology. It'…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:54 AM
5

Bit of a tangent here, less MRA related, but I feel it's related to your post so... I still can't understand why they basically rigged the DNC for her. They pretty much found the one person easier to dislike than Trump for a lot of people and said "fuck it lets go with this." and then acted surprised when it blew up in their faces. They played identity politics and lost. Their plan for 2020 looks to be double down, and go for minority woman this time with Oprah so far. I mean, my candidate lost …
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:20 AM
3

My issue with this is that it's anecdotal. Being gay what control check does the author have on how men behave sexually towards women to make that assesment definitevely? He wouldn't truly know how they behave internally at all having no experience in the matter and his view on external behavior would be warped by his own bias on sexual behavior. I would never claim to understand gay sexual culture in such a way because I have no idea what that's like being straight. A bisexual could perhaps off…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:04 AM
8

"Boys will be boys" is another phrse they have taken and warped from it's context though. I heard it a lot growing up, it was always used when someone broke an arm trying to ride a no hand wheelie, or flipped a dirt bike, or had a scuffle during sports. Never once to describe finding inappropriate behavior toward women as acceptable. Feminists and their ilk are the only ones I've seen try tonuse it in that way - merely another tool used in demonizing of men, but this time used to attack the most…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:18 AM
6

I don't know that you can though, as those are pretty much the pillars of feminism, especially the modern waves of it more so than ever. It's reached a point where I know quite a few women, particularly 45+ demographic, who once identified as feminist and have turned away and shunned the idea because it so blatantly no longer stands for what they believed in. (These of course would be your average joe type woman, who saw it as a banner for an equality movement and did not at the time see it's tr…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 03:59 AM
7

Can't speak to major issues, like possible suicides or substance problems, but I know a lot of divorced guys. An absurd amount. My experience as far as what has worked best, albeit anecdotal: Give them as much normalcy as possible. If you had a "bust their balls" kind of friendship with them, keep it up, don't get all weird and scared to hurt their feelings because things suck for example. Normal relationships are good when their most important one is fucked up. When the topic comes up, and it w…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:05 AM
2

It was to the troll, I must have screwed up and replied to the wrong post.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 03:48 AM
1

Well the post has gotten quite a bit of engagement, so maybe it's worth more than you're giving it credit for. There are multiple viable methods of helping the MRM, and stirring discussion is one of them. This post seems to have done that successfully.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:05 PM
1

Oh man, that thread was a gold mine. Thank you! The only part of his argument I'm enclined to believe is the part about being an economist, and that's purely on my anecdotal experience where all of them I've met to date are off the wall nuts who seem disconnected from reality, with a 50/50 on also being a massive would be know it all asshole, like his guy. So he fits the profile I've experienced with economists.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:58 PM
1

You are batshit crazy and out of touch with reality.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:15 PM
1

No, I'm conservative and this person is either a troll or fucking nuts.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:05 PM
1

If I had any musical ability at all I would work on this, sadly I don't.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 05:04 PM
1

Every time I hear someone listening to before he cheats I go on about he's probably cheating because she's fuckin' crazy.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 05:02 PM
1

I watched the Others as a teenager. Ranted about how fucked it was and that woman not deserving kids for days. Still makes my skin crawl. I always thought Chicago was meant to be satire or tongue in cheek, it was just too absurd for me to think it was serious..
/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:34 PM
2

That last line... I and many other guys I know would gladly be stay at home dads if we could. Reality is for most everyone in my generation both parents have to work now just to get by, it's just not economically feasible.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 06:07 AM
2

I can't really explain my reasoning better without going into spoilers for the new game, which I don't want to do and ruin it for others who may still be wanting to play. It's really about how she reacts to being saved.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 05:49 PM
1

A lot of people have moved to online versions, things like roll20. Can play without the face to face social problems like you're mentioning.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 01:40 AM
25

My wife and I just beat the newest Mario game the other day. When we got done with the story I was like "you know what, fuck Peach. Should have let Bowser have her if that's how she shows appreciation for dying dozens of times to save her stupid ass." Then I was like damn, mario really is a low key commentary on our gender roles and male disposability.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 01:24 AM
1

See, in that definition it'd still be impossible for most white people to be racist. It requires the power component. Guess what? Most white people are fucking poor/middle class just like everybody else. There's no damn power for them. In our society money is power, not being a particular skin color. It also would require prejudice, which exists independently of power. So by their definition if you're poor and prejudice, you're not racist because you lack power. There are so many problems with t…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 12:24 PM
1

I've seen as many men do this who are trying to hide behind work to avoid their family as those who think like you. Also what you run into for non married men, spending all that time at work doesn't leave them with time to start up relationships with women. So in both of those cases your hypothesis folds. It's going to be something that changes on a case by case basis, not something you can throw a blanket statement at.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 12:07 PM
3

GoT is coming to an end next season and he'll surely be looking for other work in the field. Sticking to his guns on this one could have been suicide for his career's future past GoT
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:50 AM
1

The Irish are a long history of evidence that white people absolutely can get fucked over as bad as anyone else, if not worse. I was watching some show or movie and one person was like "name a people more lucky than the Irish" and the response was something like "I could name ANY other people." Felt pretty spot on.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:22 AM
3

In work place culture other men can most definitelty be a bigger negative impact than women. I know so many men, especially older ones, who define themselves by what they do. They think if they are successful at their job that makes them a good person. They think time at the office is a badge of honor. It's completely warped, they have no sense of self or identity beyond their status as a drone to make someone else lots of money. Now me personally, fuck that. I work to make a living, I don't liv…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:06 AM
1

I wanted someone who was not reliant on me. Capable of taking care of herself. Things that told me she wanted to be there, not that she needed to. Most of the marriages and relationships I've seen fail are because one person was being propped up by the other, instead if them working together as a team. You have to want to see them succeed, not have fear that their success will harm you. Of course success is different for everyone, it doesn't have to be just financial/work place success. Maybe it…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:15 PM
49

That was the MRA equivalent of "my lawyers will bury your ass in paperwork for years!" Absolutely savage, in the best kind of way.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 06:02 AM
1

Today I learned! I'm not surprised though.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:41 AM
2

Today I learned! I'm not surprised though.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:41 AM
1

My response to this song was always "well from the sound of it, he left because you're fucking nuts." It's like some women can't comprehend that men care about more than their vagina. Or get incredibly angey when they can't use it to control a man. Not belonging in a padded room is pretty high on most people's list of things they look for in a partner.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 05:36 AM
1

I do question, but I also question NOT believing. I try to look at it from all sides, not just mine. For me now as a parent Santa is more "real" than he was as a kid. Getting to be Santa for my kids, that's magic I can get behind.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 03:17 AM
1

Man you're dense or something. I know how to do greenhouse gas experiements. I did agriculture based studies on it for 3 years. I know about the greenhouse gas effect. You didn't explain to me anything I didn't know. This is also where I saw poor excuses for science take place, like the guys who tried to sweep up a spilled sample and act like it wasn't contaminated. And the guys who tried to pad their yield weights by not properly cleaning their grain. And the PhD who openly admitted to sending …
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:32 AM
1

My point was that people have started treating science like a religion. That the most obvious evidence of this is how they act toward those with dissenting opinions, then gave some examples. You got your panties in a bunch and went off on the equivalent of a religious tirade about your science god and attacked the (presumed) non believer about the supremacy of your religion. You became a walking talking example of what I was pointing out. What's weak about that?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:07 AM
1

I was introduced to it as a child, I have religious parents, but they believed that if I were going to be religious (or "have a relationship with God" as they called it) that I needed to make that decision. They were very much about personal responsibilty and that extended into religion as well. They felt that I should be responsible for my own religious views (or lack of).
/r/MensRights30/09/17 01:02 AM
1

I didn't answer your questions because they have absolutely no relation to the comparison of how people treat science like a religion. I said plainly in my last reply that I wasn't expressing in any way that I identify with those views, I was simply stating that they exist. You're expecting me to defend views that aren't directly pertinent to the original point, which would be a waste of time and off topic, so no I didn't address them.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 12:55 AM
1

Thank you for being zealot exhibit A. You went on a massive rant for absolutely nothing other than the fact that I said there are people in the world who disagree with you and expressed some of the ways in which we see those differences expressed in the wolrd. I didn't say they were right or wrong or express any leaning one way or the other, I simply put out that there are conflicting views similar to how there are different religions (and even denominations within a religion. You went on a tira…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 11:11 PM
1

Climate change? Absolutely, you have one group carrying on about man made impact and another group saying we don't have enough data to draw that conclusion and another saying it's just natural long term weather patterns. Can't agree at all beyond that they're talking about weather. Just like different denominations (catholic v prodestant or jew v muslim). You're only looking it it from your prespective on the topic and disregarding the others. Know what a lot of religious people have done in def…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:40 AM
1

You're making wild assumptions there. I wasn't indoctrinated into a religion. I was introduced to religion but was encouraged to make my own decisions regarding it.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 03:23 AM
0

No, I've seen the zeal that people attack or defend science (see: climate change) and how they change doctrine constantly (see: food X is healthy 2 years ago, unhealthy the next year, healthy again this year) and how we pretend to understand things in the name of science that we don't yet know half as well as we like to think we do (see: mental health). Sure you may research now instead of pray, you may have science conventions instead of sunday church, biology and chemistry may be taught in pla…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:18 AM
1

Depends on your perspective. People used to worship what they considered magical. As our understanding of those things previously viewed as magic grew we started calling those studies science. Look at the scientific community objectively and you can see the similarities in many aspects. Down to the changing and opposing views on many topics that we still don't understand well enough. You might change the name of the god and how you worship, but at the end of the day science is becoming the relig…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 01:48 AM
1

Coming over in that context implies it to be true. It would be like saying "I don't believe you" instead of "you're lying." Same accusation, softer wording.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:43 AM
1

Actually that entirely depends on your age/experience and location. A bachelor's degree in rural areas with a shortage of opportunity isn't going to be worth as much as a place with an abundance of job opportunity. That's what happens when workers compete for jobs instead of jobs competeing for the best workers. It's how we ended up with entey level jobs that want a 4 year degree and half a career's worth of experience, because they could get those people in those jobs for far less money when th…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:29 AM
1

I think over time you'd see it with any system as it approaches the wctremes and the elite leech as much as posibl out of the lower classes. When men weren't enough to sate their greed for power any longer they would likely start a movement akin to feminism to get women producing for them. This also gives them more control over the youth with more adults working and fewer child rearing, so they can essentially raise them in their system to be the drones they want without the muss and fuss of soc…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 12:25 AM
3

It's amusing that you think the alt-right would let any kind of men's rights movement in. MRM runs contradictory to the near worship of capitalism when you go that far right. That region of the right is where you'll find rhetoric such as "shut up and be a man" "you're just complaining" etc about the MRM. And I say this from the perspective of a conservative leaning American.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:35 PM
2

Cuntescension, I'm stealing that. Love it.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:28 PM
3

Valid points are valid, regardless of the medium used
/r/MensRights27/09/17 05:19 PM
1

"You are however coming over butthurt now." You actually specifically referenced me as an individual. If you think using "coming over" somehow breaks that, you're failing English again. Meanwhile, I made a statement of fact, that some millenials had come of age during the worst economic situation since the great depression, which in turn was attacked as me saying that it was equally as bad as, which is not what I said.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 12:09 PM
13

Inherent difference =/= privilege. Generally speaking, being physically stronger by nature than women isn't a privilege, it's just nature. Privilege implies that there is an artificially/socially created advantage. Almost any privilege that you would list would actually be related to economic status, or a result of privilege programs like Affirmative Action.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 05:08 AM
16

How is debunking the false idea of male privilege not a men's right issue? To make progress you also need to break down the wall of lies that has people believing you have a privilege that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 04:16 AM
1

You know how you alienate young people? Calling them butthurt for disagreeing with you is a good way to do that. It seems many older people have this assumption that having a differing opinion or telling them they are wrong is akin to being offended or butthurt, when that's not necessarily the case. I try to correct these types of wrong statements not because it hurt my feelings, but because they further divide us, which isn't beneficial. I won't be bothered on a personal level by him being wron…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 05:59 PM
1

How is that a wild assumption when you said 100% of women would hide being pregnant to avoid getting fired (which is illegal and protected against in anti discrimination laws by the way.)
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:54 AM
1

Nice appeal to authority there. Many leaders in history have seen their movements become fanatical and out of control and later regretted their hand in that happening. Not a millenial specific issue. Movements evolve with time, the good and bad. Are feminists worse than the rise of street gangs in Gen X? Worse than the war protestors who spit on our soldiers during the Boomer generation? Every generation has their undesirables. You're choosing to finger point at ours while ignoring your own. My …
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:51 AM
3

Just because I'm saying you're wrong doesn't equate to being butthurt. You can disagree with someone without having hurt feelings. Sounds like you're projecting to me.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:58 AM
2

Yeah because the growing belly, morning sickness, needing to pee every 15 minutes, weird cracings at weird times, and glowing like a flashlight in a dark room are all easy to hide. Further assuming that all women would try to hide it, when that's very much not true. A considerable portion may try to early on, until they're not scared of a miscarriage or have decided yae or nae on an abortion, or tell their family, whatever they want to do before disclosing to the public, but the idea that any si…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:38 AM
1

Maybe so, but I think for people like that power is the goal. Wealth is just the means. Without men to rule over what will they have power over, nuts and bolts? What good would all their power do then?
/r/MensRights20/09/17 10:55 PM
2

I didn't say it was as bad as the depression. I said it was the worst economic situation since then. You're drawing a direct comparison that I didn't make and attacking me for your failed reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 10:46 PM
1

Because feminism is a millenial problem? Get real that path was started before many of my ancestors were even in America. Also, false assumption of me being offended. Just because I disagree with you doesn't equal being offended. Speaking of history and low engagement, the younger generations traditionally have been less involved than their elders in terms of voting (which from your wording seems to be what you're referencing). Again, not a new trend or an only millenials issue. I'd like your so…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 10:44 PM
2

No, it's not. There's a reason anecdotal evidence isn't a valid supporting argument. Even OP made sure to point out that it isn't a majority of the generation that had issue with free speech, just a very vocal minority. Pointed out with percentages. That contradict your anecdotal sentiment. Actually do any research at all and what you'll find is that millenials have been anything but spoiled as young adults, many of us having come of age in the worst economic situation since the Great Depression…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 08:13 PM
3

How many women do you think manage to go around hiding an entire pregnancy? I mean that's pretty detatched from reality.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 05:38 PM
2

Absolutely, but they would rather have useful idiots.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:48 AM
2

I was pointing out that this is not a reasonable situation for generalizations. It was an ignorant statement and you got called on it.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:41 AM
3

While it does mention that it would benefit women, that's far from the only point she makes regarding it. She also talks bout how increased paternal activity benefits society as a whole, including the man himself and the children along with women. She talks about her dad being important in her development. Also how it benefits the work place, as you have less worker turn over, less time and money in training new people. She mentions at one point something related to it that leads to an increase …
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:15 AM
9

It doesn't screw over anyone if your work place isn't being run like shit. No required notice? Most people find out about pregnancy around 8 weeks in, or roughly 2 months. If 7 months isn't enough time to make accomodations then your work place is being run like shit. Or people could just stop having kids because the work place is overly demanding, but then our country has no future or the future exists in kids who are born soley from unresponsible parents, either way not a good looking outcome.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:08 AM
10

She spends a significant amount of time speaking about the importance of fathers and why paid parental leave is important for men and women. The first 6 minutes are very good, the next 2-3 are good, the last few aren't terribly strong.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:03 AM
2

You're applying a very broad brush to a generation spanning 20 years. Also ignoring where a considerable majority of them still support free speech. The problem isn't that millenials are more problematic, they've just got technology that allows the vocal minority to be heard very loud, constantly, in a way that past generations didn't.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:48 AM
2

Liberal teachers certainly haven't helped. I'm just shy of 29, pretty much dead center of the millenial generation, and there was a huge shift towards that type of ideology from my early years to when I graduated. The thing about it is that it wasn't taught as a way of thinking, but as THE way of thinking. Critical thought and expression were shut down. I was encouraged more to make my own decisions and reach my own conclusions more in elementary than high school.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:42 AM
2

This may be true in some cases but certainly is not indicative of an entire generation. You act as though every millenial had a priviledged upbriging or never experienced hardship, sacrifice, or hard work.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:38 AM
2

1984, Brave New World, and similar literature should have been warning signs, not instruction manuals.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:36 AM
1

In older times this was probably more true than today, but then you also have to question what degree was Abrahamic religion being used as a tool by women to achieve their goals? Similar to how they used the KKK to advance their goals, and now use left wing identity politics and the religion of feminism. I would question if religion was less a cause and more like using a hammer as a weapon instead of to hit nails.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:35 AM
2

"They've basically castrated the workforce that keeps them rich and fights their wars for them." And it's starting to blow up in their faces as more and more men stop giving a fuck about society. By trying to castrate them they've also removed or dampened the effects of many of the traditional motivators for men.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:30 AM
3

"Poor people don't have the luxury of being offended at Shakespeare or Homer, they have real fucking problems." This right here, truth bomb.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:22 AM
1

Thank you for that last note. Being a millenial is awkward for me, as I'm too old to identify with the later half of the generation (especially with my upbringing being more old school) but too young for the older half that more closely identifies with Gen X. Personally I favor protecting all free speech. Including what they define as hate speech (which seems to be ever growing and a way to shout down opposing views. We don't like what you said, it's hate speech now!). I also include business in…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:20 AM
1

Except it's not 1-4%. Add in the infertile, people who simply choose not to reproduce, homosexuals/other non hetero, and religious figures who abstain from having kids and that number gets higher. Even if you have a 1-4% variance, that's enough to say that a rule isn't universal and doesn't always apply.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:47 PM
1

You made the point I've been trying to make, there are people who produce for society without children who are not homosexual as well. They provide benefit for society without it all being done for the purpose of sex, as you said from a continuity standpoint they serve at the same functional level as homosexuals. Which is exactly what I've been pointing out the whole time, that the "everyone only does it for sex to continue the species" argument isn't universally true for everyone. It's not the …
/r/MensRights03/09/17 10:23 PM
1

How do you figure the only alternatives are killing or dying? That's simply not true. Look at the people who have been unable to have kids, or those who chose to forfeit relations and kids to focus on their work, the kind of people who are married to their work, not just as an insult thrown at workaholics, and the people who could have kids and choose not to because they don't want the burdennor reaponsibility. Throughout history there have been plenty of them. Also how do you figure homosexuali…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:55 PM
1

You don't see it because you are ignoring the part of human nature where people will kill and produce for power well beyond what you need to get laid and have kids. If getting laid was the end all, people would only produce what was necessary to have kids and then stop. It doesn't account for those who are ambitious, curious, power hungry, or naturally insatiable in some way. It doesn't account for the people who have chosen not to partake in sex, rather for religious or personal reasons, who st…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:00 PM
0

That's still a grand generalization. There are plenty of cases where that can be shown not to be true. You're looking at things in a macro scale and in the process over simplifying. In a conversation based on specific elements of human nature, those kinds of generalizations are not constructive nor helpful.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:54 PM
2

That depends on where you live. Where I live is an at-will state, no union, and they don't set their own schedules.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:43 PM
3

I wouldn't say low paid. Maybe at the lowest tiers, but RNs make pretty good money, even in rural areas.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:42 PM
3

There were only 1 or 2 male nurses that I saw when our kids were in NICU. That is a fucking heart breaking place to be, much less work. Hats off to you for doing it, regardless of who you do it with.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:39 PM
0

I would disagree with that. Sometimes removing your enemy from the face of the earth is simply removing them from the face of the earth. Sometimes it's about resources to survive, because staying alive is more important than sex, being a prerequisite to it. People have willingly led lives of abstinence and become eunichs in order to serve the god/gods they worship. To those people there was a higher calling than sex. There's an entire section of men who are abandoning sex because it's not worth …
/r/MensRights03/09/17 03:23 PM
1

That would be a claim that can be proven false. Many of our advances in civilization have been in order to get better at killing eachother while keeping ourselves alive. Weaponry (which also improves hunting and survivability against non human animals as well), medical triage treatment techniques, just as the obvious examples. We might consider many of them out dated now, but at the time they were game changers.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:29 AM
1

Oprahism, love that. I don't think any self respecting religion wants to be associated with the cult like mentality of feminism though.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 05:24 AM
1

It's not just feminist. You see this ideology all over the SJW faction of the left that plays identity politics. Look no further than calls for reparations for slavery that still persist 150 years after the american civil war, the pushing of ideas like white proviledge and promoting white guilt. When they wanted to put in that pipeline in North Dakota they were constantly reminding us who the US -really- belonged to and how the rest of us were just thieves. Even though those events were long bef…
/r/MensRights26/08/17 10:13 PM
2

Volunteer it? Hell start with getting them to stop shoving it in your face. Asking repeatedly, and rewording it trying to trip you up so you agree by misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 09:37 PM
4

I look at it like this, how would women react if we said we better cut their breasts off because they might get breast cancer one day? It's fucking retarded. We can't go around butchering children because of a very heavy "maybe".
/r/MensRights26/08/17 09:35 PM
2

The number of people who didn't 100% this is disheartening.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 09:29 PM
1

Husky, chubby, fluffy, whatever word you want to pick, they generally have the same use - a replacement word for fat, or to describe varying degrees of fat.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:35 PM
3

It can be indicative overall fitness, but there can be coorelation without causation. You can still be chubby or considered overweight/obese and be capable of benching your own body weight. When I was 18 I weighed 225, benched 300, military pressed my body weight, and was still considered fat by my peers and the BMI scale. I did sit up sets by laying my lower back at the edge of the weight bench, locking my feet in the gap for the headrest, going shoulders to the floor and coming up elbows to kn…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 04:48 AM
7

Not when the reason is because you're seen as a predator though. I hate it, I've always liked kids. They're great, they're usually happy and will tell you what they really think, they don't have the social nice-ness (aka lying skills) of teens and adults. So I absolutely hate the perception of men being predators. I hate that I feel like my toddlers need to go to the bathroom with my wife because someone might jump to weird assumptions/accusations if I try to change them in the men's room. This …
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:58 AM
5

Yeah you can definitely feel the intensity and anger ramp up the further you go. I think it would have a stronger impact if you kept it short and sweet, and impartislly written.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:46 AM
5

So if you're fat and strong it's okay then? Being able to bench your own body weight isn't necesarily a great metric. Aside from that, I think we have bigger issues to deal with for the MRM than fighting with someone about being perfectly healthy.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:41 AM
3

I'm not color blind and I still think it looks like eye cancer.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:37 AM
1

As would I, but until that happens, I would rather my tax dollars compensate my fellow man than go to some other programs we currently fund. Like I said, they need to have accountability, but I realize things are a process. Step one is compensation for those denied due process, next we can work on making the guilty parties take responsibility.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:23 AM
3

I won't say this is all women by any means, but I have encountered a significant number of them like what you're describing. When they would describe wanting a "man" they could treat like that I would point blank tell them "what you're talking about sounds like a girlfriend with a dick, not a boyfriend." Obviously some of them would get pissed and have a fit, but what really shocked me was the number of them that started to get really mad then thought about it and then openly agreed that yes, th…
/r/MensRights19/08/17 02:46 AM
0

I see our tax dollars wasted in far worse ways than this. I'm okay with it. Edit to clarify: I'm okay with my tax dollars going to this as opposed to other programs, not with there being no accountability for those who denied them due process.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:50 AM
6

If I had a 3D printer I would!
/r/MensRights18/08/17 08:05 AM
1

Like I said, I'm not using it as a damn scientific stand in, but as an example of people responding to an issue. Sure, some if may be anecdotal and not true, but there are a wide enough selection of such articles avaliable that somewhere in them has to have a common thread that can be picked out. Similar to the idea that every joke or stereotype has a grain of truth, even if it's been inflated or exaggerated.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:48 AM
1

I've yet to see any stats saying it isn't the case either. What I'm talking about is entirely unrelated to feminists, so I'm not sure why you're dragging their whining into it, unless you're trying to associate me with them indirectly because I disagree with you, in which case, you're so off target you wouldn't hit the side of a barn with a grenade. My point on articles wasn't that they're scientifically sound (and quite frankly so much biased, bad science and statistical manipulation happens in…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:08 AM
1

It's not an exception when it's wide spead. I mean there's no shortage of articles out there complaining about the different approach the millenial generation has to the work place.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:09 PM
1

Not necessarily. There are plenty of men who value being a good dad above anything work related. A job is just a job, a means to an end. When I'm dead they'll replace me with another warm body and keep rolling. Beyond our ability to make them more money they couldn't care less. A lot of people in my generation saw our fathers give up being a good dad to be a good worker, just to get fucked by the companies they had devoted themselves to when times got tough. That faith in our system was shaken t…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:15 AM
2

This is so much why I hate our current system. The high school popularity contest never ends, it just gets a makeover. People ripping eachother apart for scraps from the master's table. Just makes me sick how many people can't see it and worse, the ones who can that don't give a fuck like that's how it should be. It's like we haven't learned a thing in 6,000 years except how to convince more people embrace servitude and attack those who don't. I've resorted to saying "1984 should have been a war…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:49 AM
1

Yeah I can't say it with certainty, but I'd feel pretty comfortable betting on it and I'm not a gambler.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:14 AM
1

Because if they did this study honestly, it would most likely show that wealth is the biggest factor, or at least that's my guess. Why would they want to do that? They want people licking their boots and treating them as saviors for providing jobs, rather than realize they're paying them a fraction of the value of their work and that many problems could be reduced if not eliminated by reducing wealth inequality. It could further lead to reducing other major contributing factors like education, d…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:11 AM
3

I've said this for years, people generally just look at me like I've rattled off an elaborate conspiracy theory or climed to be abducted by aliens. Glad to see someone else talking about it.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:01 AM
0

My problem with that is you seem to think that makes them incapable of being right. Would you care so much if they weren't religion affiliated? As for politics, everything is political any more. If these people want to make meaningful change to the health community then being politically active is a good way to get their voice out and drum up support.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 12:09 PM
2

It's 2017, haven't we figured out that Snopes is not a reliable source? If you want to talk about bad science, at least go for something from like the AAP that disagrees, not Snopes.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:23 AM
3

If you're getting 9/10 doctors to say that I want to look at WHERE you are polling these doctors from. 9/10 doctors in California and 9/10 doctors in Texas are likely to be very different things. When I'll really take that kind of statistic seriously is when 9/10 doctors from California and Texas agree. Also what type of doctor? GPs, pediatricians, psychologists? In general, I find this type of polling statistic unreliable at best. If it was Brexit would have failed and Trump would have lost, no…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:16 AM
2

I would even consider that independent could include owning your own business, where you're not depending on working for another person to provide your income, but on your own ability. You're absolutely right though, the concept has changed drastically.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:04 PM
3

This combined with the old "men's work" vs "woman's work" ideas where I come from that have yet to die. It's nearly impossible to get an office or clerical type job as a man here because they still see that as a "woman's job". I see it as a job that pays better, with better hours, a better environment (out of the elements), and better benefits. I see it as a job I can probably do for another 20 years without having to have my shoulder surgically repaired because the work I do now is damaging it …
/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:08 AM
2

What's sad about this to me, is that it's not necessarily untrue. Capitalism as we know it now in the US does exploit people. Especially now that in some places they've made it illegal to collect your own water and energy, effectively forcing you to live on-grid and participate in society. More sonif you have kids, as they'll try to claim an off-grid lifestyle is detrimental and use it as an excuse to take your children until you comply with how they want you to function in society. A principle …
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:58 AM
1

Would the people behind EEOC actually do shit? I always figured they were some of the ones pandering diversity and affirmative action.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:49 AM
9

I was wondering this as well. Edit: This was also around the time I was born (89). So I'm wondering if this coorelates to the beginning of the cultural shift our country seems to have taken since I was a kid compared to now. Especially when you hear things from older co-workers at pretty much very place about "this used to be a good place to work, we used to work and be able to have fun, they used to value/care about their workers" and such. Wonder if that shift in work environments and the shif…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:54 AM
8

Far more accurate
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:33 AM
2

We had premie twins in NICU for a month. It was a constant goddamn fight about not circumcising them. I was like you, afraid we would make a trip home for clothes/shower/pet care and come back to find them circumcised. It was infuriating. When we got home our pediatrician asked for a few visits before he remembered while asking us in the middle of the third visit and didn't ask any more thankfully. It was one in a long list of shit that was absurd. They were all but bullying my wife about breast…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 04:59 AM
4

When they start the "real men" shit I ask are you being a "ream woman"? Playing games isn't very "real" of them.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 11:00 PM
6

Well rather you support trans or not, it's undeniable that it would be a make or break issue for a lot of people. I absolutely see how that could be false representation of oneself in their eyes. If we would define false representation as a basis for rape in a hetero situation, I think you would have to here as well.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 05:23 PM
13

It's a societal problem. Children are not taught to think for themselves anymore, but to be a good little drone and follow orders. Believe what they teach you, unquestioningly. Go to college because you have to get a degree to mature into an adult drone sonyou can make other people rich. We might have put it in a fancier suit, but the game is still the same: find the best method possible to control people and exploit them to gain more money for those at the top. Used to be slavery, now the slave…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:12 AM
3

It wasn't even the only moment in that episode that I felt that way about sadly.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:05 AM
3

They may not help pro bono, but may be willing to make payment arrangements with you for after everything is settled. Talk to the local law endorcement. You may be able to arrange for them to escort you to your home to gather your possessions. If you have to sell or pawn them for now to get by.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:53 AM
2

Like someone else said, many will do free consults. Explain your situation, that along with your home she has barred access to your place of business. You may find one who will be willing to arrange a payment plan with you for after you are able to operate again. They may even be able to speed up the process of getting a roof back over your head and your business back running. One thing is for sure at this point: it damn sure can't hurt to ask. Even if they say no you're not going to be in a wor…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 01:46 AM
19

Just be glad that most of them don't realize poor men are probably worth more to their family dead than alive, financially speaking. We looked at it a few years ago, if I were to die at the time my wife and kids would have made as much or more in widow/dead parent benefits than from me working. I make a bit more money now, so it may no longer be the case thankfully. It's a really shit feeling to break your back daily to help provide just to find out dying would provide better than living.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:08 AM
1

I tend to watch more foreign media, or shows that don't focus on relationships myself. We also watch a lot of stuff geared toward learning new things from music trivia to how to cook new treats to interviews with people in foreign countries to see how they view things differently from us in the US.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 04:29 PM
3

That entirely depends on what type of TV you consume and what your goal of tv watching is. Vegging out on reality shows? Sure, I can agree with you. Watching for entertainment because you enjoy a great story? I don't see how that's any worse than reading fiction books or playing video games for enjoyment. There's nothing wrong with having fictional role models. They just shouldn't be the ONLY positive role models in someone's life.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 06:57 AM
1

I agree and have said the same toany people - false accusers should get the sentence the accused would have gotten if guilty. The problem is in cases lacking evidence that it's basically a he said she said argument. In that case we should rightly default to innocent until PROVEN guilty. However, that also means potentially letting a lot of rapist walk. In regards to that though, I look at the men who founded our system (in the US) and what they invisioned for our country. I would point to Benjam…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:05 AM
6

That bald fuck meaning Bruce Willis? I apparently completely missed that in Die Hard. Brings a new meaning to the movie title.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 02:10 AM
1

I know some are saying not a men's issue, but with protection of family often being a trait ascribed to men - rather rightfully so or not aside - it's an issue that I see as heavily impacting men more than women. In additiin to that, I'd wager that shooting as a sport and hunting are probably more popular among men as well. So while it may not be directly men's issue or a hot button item, I don't think it's entirely without merit.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:17 AM
2

I really thing as MGTOW grows numbers 1 and 2 are likely to reverse. As men want less and less to do with them the number if false alligations due to ego will rise. It'll become a form of control. Do what I want or I'll accuse you and ruin you.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:59 AM
3

All too common. Cry rape instead of taking responsibility.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:56 AM
1

Every school horror story I hear these days reaffirms my belief that homeschooling is going to be the right course for my kids
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:54 AM
7

This just... When I read things like this I always think of paladins from fantasy rpgs. That level of zeal and conviction. That's what I want someone to have and punch her in the face with. That monster is going to destroy her children. I wish shit like this were admissable as grounds for the state to remove them from her care.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:15 AM
4

Yeah. Immigration. Ask Germany and Sweden how that's going. It kills me that feminists jump on the refugee/islam train. If they really valued women's rights at all they would want to keep that shit as far away from any woman they cared about as possible. I mean, I'm married, job, etc. not what would fit the MGTOW crowd. My wife was as disappointed, if not more so, about the pandering BBC just did in making a female Doctor Who. Generally believes feminism is outdated and actually harmful to women…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 06:03 AM
6

Yeah, they've upped their bread and circus game since the Roman days. Started using 1984 and Brave New World as fucking operator manuals instead of warning labels.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 05:49 AM
2

Not really. I was taught equality and respect, be it for man or woman. Growing up I saw on a regular basis the difference in status men and women have in society. Women being placed on pedistals and treated like princesses, men being treated as there to serve them, disposable. I had girls in class be hostile to me for being one of the top in my class with little effort - and not just because I didn't have to work for it, but because they acted like I was taking away from them by not being stupid…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 05:45 AM
0

If you're a man with family they think you should be spending that "free" time at work instead of gaming or watching sports.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:41 AM
3

This is how I break it down too. Cost per hour of entertainment. Books and video games are both really cheap on the cost:hour ratio.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:34 AM
1

Depends on the game. Some you can clear in a few hours. On the other end of the spectrum, some like The Witcher 3 took me like 200 hours on my first playthrough but I did the vast majority of the side content.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:32 AM
5

My motto: I work to live, not live to work.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:29 AM
4

One benefit of being a millenial: we watched employers, en mass, fuck the older generation of employees and didn't even give them a courtesy reach around. People who had dedicated years, missed ball games and dance recitals, had their marriages fall apart because they worked and weren't home being a spouse or parent, fucked over in an instant when the economy took a nose dive leading up to the 08 recession and in the aftermath of it. They gave their lives to their work and got shit on. Who in th…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:28 AM
3

Isn't this already happening in several places? I'm not great with international happenings, but I've been led to understand that the UK, Japan, and a few other European countries are experiencing negative impacts from this type of feminist rule already. Lower interest and participation in society, lower rates of marriage and births, a general IDGAF from the younger male population because society is stacked against them and it's not worth the fight to them.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:54 AM
7

"and the company did their best to keep you poor enough that you couldn't afford to leave." Glad to see society has come so far. /s
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:49 AM
1

Why are kids classes a bad thing? I've never bothered taking any martial arts, but I thought a lot of the fundamentals involved were discipline, self control, things like that. Seems like a good way to get kids involved and wanting to practice those kinds of good habits.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:05 AM
1

Sorry, but that's still bullshit. Slavery and the days of women not being in the workforce are plenty far enough removed that they can't be used as an excuse. You're not wrong that we should be making better candidates, but the way we do that isn't by tearing down white men and the middle class - and that is the result we're getting with affirmative action. It's not takig away from the wealthy, because they're wealth is stronger than affirmative action can touch. Instead it hits middle class wor…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:56 PM
1

I can answer that one: a fucking hilarious sitcom starring Tim Allen
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:07 AM
1

Sometimes people have trouble differentiating between trolls looking for a fight and people who honestly don't know and are looking for answers. Since it's hard to convey tone on the internet, communication breakdowns like this happen.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 05:05 AM
2

Wealth inequality is a -very- different beast than racial or gender based merit. You're trying to apply football rules to baseball with that kind of argument. One of them is actual priviledge provided by money. The other is bullshit. We don't need affirmative action, we need to stop destroying the middle class. They're not even remotely the same problem.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:58 AM
1

Well in Gallileo's case, he was right rather than crazy. Steve Jobs certainly was a douchebag. He's probably as close to a real example of what I'm talking about as you can get. But he can't be honestly credited for a considerable portion of his work, as he was well known to be an idea thief. He benefitted primarily.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:27 PM
1

Well what's interesting is the idea that at 18 you should set out on your own completely jndependent and "launch" so to speak is really a very American thing. For many other countries it's pretty standard to live with family into adulthood and becoming established. The out at 18 version of the American dream also died when higher education became the norm rather than the exception. Now you have people going through an extra 4-8 years of school riddled with debt before even trying to launch. Olde…
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:12 PM
1

Sorry, but they are two different things. Thats why we call them genital mutilation and rape separately. Words have meaning, and that kind of thinking of mgm=rape is the kind of thinking the extremist feminists use to depend their positions.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 02:02 PM
2

That makes so much more sense now. I thought something in my post may have been worded in a confusing manner or gotten misread.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:39 AM
1

In the modern day neither Judaism nor Christianity are raping kids and approving of it. That shit with Catholic priests isn't a religion sanctioned thing, it's them being fucking sick perverts. I'd have to do more research, but I'm fairly sure you're not going to find that as a God approved action in the old or new testament at all. I believe Muhammed or however you spell his fucking name did take a child bride (by today's standards) of 9 years old in the Quran, but the other side of this is tha…
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:38 AM
9

My outlook is this, the dick sucking of STEM is ridiculous. If everyone got a STEM degree they'd become fucking worthless due to over saturation of the field. People would have STEM degrees and not be able to find work in STEM fields. So the answer isn't to double down on "STEM or GTFO". I'm not saying gender studies is a legitimate course of study, but there are others that are that get shit on for not being STEM. We need business people, teachers, lawyers, medical professionals - and not just …
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:27 AM
1

Can't say I agree with this. Having passion about something has never made me act like a lunatic. Nor would I say that it has a proveable net benefit to society rather than the individual.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:20 AM
1

No, a lot of us have those, but we also have morals and ethics and a limit to what we will do to advance. Being able to look at myself in the mirror means more than being a worthless piece of shit to make a little more money than someone else
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:18 AM
1

What are you calling "most denominations?" Because almost all prodestant denominations I've seen still practice it. Maybe the Catholics don't, I can't say I'm as familiar with their practices, but that's only one denomination, even if it's a large one.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:15 AM
1

Well when you mentioned mobility and high paying job together, I took it to mean upward mobility.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:12 AM
5

I hope so. Ours are 2 1/2 and it was every fucking time a doctor or nurse came around we were getting asked about it and looked at like freaks for not having it done. It was incredibly bothersome.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:11 AM
2

Did you not read all of what I said? Christians did adopt it. Hell, there's sections about Paul arguing with them about the old laws and having the dispute settled. Someone in this sub made a post on it a while back, breaking down circumcision via the new testament. In it, it is no longer a biblical requirement for Christians as it is for Jews. This means that they needlessly and wrongly continued the practice.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 06:09 AM
3

"Who will do anything to rise to the top" actually sounds more like a sociopath than a gender thing.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:09 PM
38

To them it is. They don't want to accept that hiring in merit means that straight white men might have more merit than them in the workforce.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:07 PM
8

Which is really a terrible excuse. If you're not with a steady partner and worried about STDs you should probably either 1) be wearing protection anyway (while it isn't a fail safe, any help is better than no help) or 2) make better decisions and not sleep with people you have concerns about catching fucking HIV/HPV from. In either case, common sense does more to help prevent than circumcision, even if those studies weren't bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:04 PM
1

Well there is a healthy dose of anti-semitism in this sub along with a general anti-religion vibe. However, I do agree that calling a spade a spade is fair. It's a Jewish religious practice that was adopted by christians and muslims. That's not anti-religious, it's just the truth. The boundary is when you go from "this is where the issue came from" to "fuck all religions, get rid of them because we disagree with them!" Which is something I do see expressed in this sub too often.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:54 PM
1

Question here is how much larger is the muslim population than the Jewish population? I think a per capita comparison would be more relevent for this.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:44 PM
11

My problem is doing it as infants. If they were adults doing it of their own volition for religious reasons I would have no issue with that.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:33 PM
24

If you have one be prepared to tell them no on circumcision 5000 times. I was pissed off by the time we left (our twins were premie, had a month NICU stay) and we were constantly asked. Then our pediatrician asked us for like our first 3 or 4 visits. I finally got him to stop by going "look, that's the way they were made. If they want to change it for religious reasons later in life, that needs to be of their own choice."
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:29 PM
1

Do you know what post-partum is? It's a condition that presents after a woman gives birth. You wouldn't be able to perform eugenics on someone for post-partum because they have to give birth first. Also, many women experience post partum and don't harm their children. Like I said, I think the post partum has to coincide with an already hefty dose of crazy for them to do something that terrible
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:15 PM
4

Source on IQ being a good predictor of upward mobility? I've always heard the exact opposite, that IQ isolated is a terrible predictor - that it has to be combined with other factors such as social likeability (someone wants to hire you), starting social status (easier to have connections to help if you're wealthy, or poor enough to get the government to pay for your formal education), and of course hard work and a dash of luck. In otherwords, while having a high IQ may help, the social componen…
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:32 PM
7

Part of me agrees, because it presents a pretty graphic imagery, but part of me is also like fuck that, look at it and see what it is instead of hiding it behind a tag that makes it easy to ignore
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:25 PM
1

They're not permanently impacted with post-partum, so while it has the potential to cause acute reactions for a period of time, it's not like they're permanently bit-shit crazy. At least for the sake of this particular argument. I personally think illness or not if you're capable of infantcide then you've got a hefty dose of crazy.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:08 PM
7

You're trying to justify killing infants because "muh hormones". You're getting talked to like trash for being trash, not because someone is being abusive.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:59 PM
46

Why not? It's true. It's a Jewish religious practice that spread into Christianity (wrongly, if they read the new testament themselves instead of listening to what people tell them they would know this) and then was kept active by lies by the medical community that there were health benefits to mutilating your children.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:52 PM
1

You nailed it at the end. You don't have to agree on everything. Just the major things. (I.e. Father's rights, genital mutilation, fairness in the legal system, male health issues being unaddressed/expendable male society) You build a platform for a movement, just like a political party. Obviously even within the party people have different ideas, but the main goals are generally the same. They bring unity and a sense of identity and clarity about what their movement is.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 11:40 PM
12

Not even mental health care. More like fixing the underlying environmental and social issues that push men toward suicide. Sure, mental health is a component in the statistic, but far from the only one or even the most important one right now.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 06:54 PM
3

If I killed 6 million people and said "I do this in the name of the god Blutarg!" does that make it true? Especially if I were not only committing genocide, but committing genocide on your chosen people. That's not about religion, it would be about me being a madman.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 05:02 PM
2

I did say largely, not exclsuively. I know they weren't all in retaliation to Islamic expansion. The main ones that people tend to remember and talk about were though.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:59 PM
1

It's my inspiration. Sadly, I think I'll die about a milleina short of such a majestic feat.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 05:12 AM
1

I just was impressed with how he performed on the field in light of all that shit going on in his life. I mean lets be real, that dude didn't have a problem getting laid. Star college QB at any D1 school wouldn't. I take it with a healthy dose of skepticism, as I do when anyone with celebrity status is accused like this. Not saying he did or didn't, but my natural inclination is definitely to say prove it.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 05:11 AM
3

It hurts how true this is. How at a young age I knew teaching was largely a woman's profession and further one that is largely hostile to males. I had 3 male teachers I can remember in school that weren't coaches who were required to also teach. One of them was ancient and filling in until they hired a permanent physics teacher. The other 2 were DLC and not physically in the room, just on a TV and we had a female monitor in the room with us.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 05:01 AM
5

My problem here is you're crediting some actions to Christanity that most certainly can't be credited to it. The fucking holocaust? I mean seriously, some shitty things have been done in the name of Christanity - the Inquisition, the Salem witch trials, etc. The holocaust certainly doesn't belong on that list. Killing Jews and claiming you do it in the name of Christianity is as absurd as saying you're purposefully spreading AIDS via homosexual sex in the name of Christianity. Those things just …
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:55 AM
2

That's like saying "don't point out how bad A is without pointing out B, because B is also bad." That in no way changes that A is still bad, it just derails comversation about it.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:41 AM
1

This really reminds me of the difference in my mom and dad. My mom is 100% the type of right wing religious nutjob that liberals fear. She makes moderate conservatives shake their head in shame. She would run Christianity down your throat while being a poor example of what it's really about. My dad's like this is what I believe, why I believe it, make your own decisions about what you believe and why. It's night and day, even though they share the same religion.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:38 AM
1

And it sounds fucking MAJESTIC. Like Ramuh's beard level majestic. For beard reference: http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Ramuh_(Final_Fantasy_XV)
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:27 AM
6

Who needs facts when they have feelings?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 09:02 PM
1

You're correct. It was late at night and I used the wrong term in my half asleep state.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:32 AM
1

Not at all. Cognitive dissonance. They'll double down on their stance, even though it's wrong and they know it.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:34 PM
4

Glad I'm not the only one who felt that way.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:31 PM
1

You're right, it was just in the full context of what you said it made it sound like being in the know about who's who was a really important thing. From what you've said here though I must have read it in the wrong way. Sometimes tone is hard to get on reddit.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:14 PM
6

One thing I really like about this is that she acknowledges the benefits of marriage. Notes that the institution of marriage itself is not a problem, but rather the drastic lack of balance in the distribution of power in a marriage now. Very good speech overall. Really like the real world examples she used to illustrate the issues and relate them to things most people have seen or experienced.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 02:16 AM
1

Not that I in any way agree with the troll, but I do want to make an argument here regarding popular figures in any movement. That is simply that who they are is relatively unimportant to some of us. What is important is what they say. I couldn't tell you the names of major feminist leaders, not many political leaders other than my own, but what I can remember is what they say. The salesman is less important than the product so to say. I've lurked this sub for around a year now and if someone me…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 02:02 AM
3

A lot of men know, but probably a far greater number haven't heard it laid out cohesively like this.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 01:42 AM
4

Yeah it wasn't even a good attempt at humor. It was just straight up degrading.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 01:20 AM
3

One thing I can be proud of my state for, first shelter for men!
/r/MensRights09/06/17 06:09 AM
0

You're making assumptions to build your argument now, and false ones. I'm very much aware that men and women are fundamentally different. I also know that despite those differences you still can't apply a generalization that broad and expect it to hold up as true. MRAs are constantly debunking feminist myths built on that exact style of thinking. So yes, when you use the same tacts as feminists to make an argument, I will compare you to them and call that out. That's not tone policing, it's the …
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:53 PM
0

The fuck are you on about? You were talking about every woman secretly testing men, not getting pregnant. You call a statement of fact tone policing? If you do the SAME THING as someone doing a WRONG THING then you are ALSO WRONG. That's basic fucking logic a 2 year old understands. You might want to look in the mirror for that mangina, because you clearly can't handle being told you're wrong.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:04 AM
-1

It's wrong because it's not accurate. If it is, by all means prove it. The fuck are you talking about tone policing? You said something objecticely wrong and I called you on it. That's not tone policing.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 02:05 AM
1

I had no idea the legality of it, just was an idea. Even if it won't hold up in court they might could find out for their own peace of mind
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:00 PM
-1

Painting all women as anything is as wrong as painting all men as something. If you start thinking in extremes you become just as bad as the feminists.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:58 PM
2

One thing I've learned is that a lot of women who call themselves feminists aren't actually feminist. They want women's issues addressed, but if you took the actual cult of feminism, and told them about it without revealing that you were talking about feminism, many of them would balk at it.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:29 AM
1

So basically ... lets use some common sense? Because if i were going to tl;dr your paraphrase, that's how I'd do it.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:24 AM
1

If you're marrying one like that, you're picking the wrong women. Granted it probably is the majority of them, but better single than marrying a psychological terrorist.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:15 AM
1

It's expensive but one potential way to bypass this would be to order DNA test kits from 3rd parties, like ancestry or 23andme. One for presumed dad and kid. It's not going to be as conclusive as the other options, but those other options don't give men any information apparently. Obviously if you share like 1% DNA, you're not the dad. I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know if you could have an expert examine and verify the results and have it hold up in court or not. But if any of you are lawyers or…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:12 AM
6

This is one thing I was thankful for, my parents taught me never to beat a woman, not never to hit a woman. I was told if she wants to step up and hit you like a man she can take an ass whooping like a man. That respect and not hitting someone was a 2 way street. When we were kids the girls wouldn't hit me like they would the other boys our age because they knew I would hit back. I felt bad for them, getting bullied because the girls knew if they defended themselves they would get in trouble. It…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:02 AM
2

Well that's not looking at the whole picture. You can worry about both simulataniously for one. Worrying about one doesn't take away from worrying about the other. Secondly, that foreign culture would behead us as quickly as they'd rape our women. Women aren't the only ones who stand to be victims of that culture. Sure it may be considered worse to women, because they treat their own women like shit, but it's not like they're wanting to take the infidels out for a fuckin Saturday afternoon beer …
/r/MensRights05/06/17 12:13 PM
2

Western gynocentric culture may be worse to men, but that doesn't mean Islam isn't terrible to women. Acknowledging one doesn't mean ignoring the other - that kind of thinking is what feminists lean on to justify keeping men down. If it doesn't advance their goals then it works against them, even though thats not true.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:09 AM
1

/u/zulu127 beat me to it, you saif that you laugh at them.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:01 PM
1

My problem with this is that it implies money is the only thing that matters. Yes STEM fields among are the most lucrative. They are not the only WORTHWHILE degrees to pursue. Obviously the medical field is another that happens to be lucrative. Aside from that though, even other fields - such as education for one example - are worthwhile. Some things matter more to people than the money. There's nothing wrong with that, and it's not something to be laughed at - unless you think it's cool to laug…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:48 PM
1

Wow you're right. It's not much of a difference but still male civ is higher. It really puts the male suicide problem into perspective on just how bad it is
/r/MensRights30/05/17 04:16 PM
1

For some reason the fact of civilian males being higher than even veteran females is sticking out to me. I feel like there's a factor there that I'm missing, about why the disparity is still so high.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:52 AM
2

As someone not terribly familiar with this issue in the UK, I have a question. I've heard a few times over the past decade or so that feminists have had a very noticeable negative impact on men there. Things like decreased productivity, higher male unemployment and men not seeking jobs as much, fewer men in education or seeking higher education, and fewer men interested in relationships. I hear that a lot of it largely stemmed from the growth in popularity and acceptance of feminist ideas to the…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:43 AM
1

Why do you say conservatives in this? I'm generally conservative by today's standards, and I agree that if we have a draft they should have to sign up for that shit too. I was pissed off when I registered to vote and learned that women were able to do so without signing up for selective service. There wasn't that weight on their shoulders that whoever they voted for could be the difference in them going to war or not - or how likely they were to have good leadership to help keep them alive if th…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:35 PM
1

Thankfully it is on Hulu, smaller platform but I was able to find it and watxhbit on there earlier tonight
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:26 AM
3

I would agree with him 100%. Many of the issues aren't singularly men or women issues, they are societal issues. As you pointed out many of tem are issues with our economic system - people looking to see how they can stand on your shoulders to elevate themselves. I've told my wife before that one of the greatest things about being poor and ugly is you know people who like you genuinely like you for who you are - because you have no value in money or looks to offer them.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:17 AM
2

I hate this saying so much. Thankfully mine would probably find it as stupid as I do.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:51 PM
2

On religion and circumcision: I'm religious but by no means devout, come from prodestant background. My reasoning was that if God made man then he designed them the way that he wanted them. Foreskins and all. If my children decided for themselves to get circumcized for religious reasons, it should be their own decision.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:39 PM
2

So find appropriate topics. At least two people now gave suggested this is not the place for that one.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:15 PM
1

I feel like you're close but no quite on key. Many people seem to be mixing race and culture, which is understandable as they do often overlap. What I think we have to look at is what cultural influences predispose someone to criminal behavior. Poverty could certainly be a contributing factor to that, but I'm very hesitant to believe it is the only one, or even the most important one.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 05:45 AM
8

The point is it's not on topic/relevent to the discussion at hand. Bringing fights over religion into issues like this is how you destroy a movement, too busy in-fighting over disagreements to focus on the things that are agreed on.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 05:31 AM
3

Well I think that is a pretty extreme stance, I'm not asking for a complete societal overhaul here, but forgetting to lock the door when you poo should not be even something you consider on the list of stuff that could get someone charged as a sexual predator.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:22 PM
4

I got to the point where he said she was hitting his friend and noped out. I'm not at all an advocate of hitting women, but I'll be damned if any woman is going to hit on me, or my friend in my presence. She would've gotten the ass whooping she clearly never did as a child.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:09 PM
10

Imagine when that young girl has tumblerina parents who want to charge you as a sexual predator for taking a shit and forgetting to lock the door, because they didn't teach their kid how to knock.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:03 PM
11

With what I read through the thread, it sounded like the woman's story changed more than a clock's seconds hand. That alone to me seems like solid grounds for reasonable doubt? So to tell him he's better off pleading guilty sounds like a case of lazy defender who didn't want to fight an uncertain and biased case, even though it sounds like it was the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:51 PM
21

I wonder if he could possibly get a suit for incompetent counsel and have his conviction overturned? Not real familiar with legal proceedings, especially in NY, but would it be worth him looking into?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:38 PM
2

I think one thing that may be missed here, especially to those unfamiliar with SNL, is that they do a lot of satire. My thought when I saw this (aside from being funny, because well, conedy is comedy and I laugh at everyone.) was that it was done to draw attention to issues like this and show case how lighty we take it as a society.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:41 AM
1

I'll give her credit for addressing that, saying she was surprised about how women wanted a masculine man not a chick with a dick
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:44 PM
1

I read a few years back about this kind of being an issue in England, that women had become placed on such a high platform that men just started saying they're not worth it and women wouldn't come off it and approach them. It was creating a lot of animosity between genders and hurting society as a whole because men were becoming less productive without feeling that a woman/family was depending on him to bring home the bacon. Sadly I can't source it since it was a long time ago, but it really stu…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:37 PM
1

I'm not a physician so I really don't know how to properly compare it. I think the comparison is that clit mutilation would reduce sexual pleasure for a woman the same way reduced sensitivity from circumcision would a man. As an uncircumcized person, I always figured it would be a better sexual experience to be cut, since less sensitivity would seem to equate to more longevity, but I really don't know. I don't have any issues with my sex life so I don't really have any reason to find out first h…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:07 AM
1

Typically they will be more sensitive because their penis head is not exposed constantly. Of course every person is different, but that seems to be the standing theory I've seen most often.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 04:23 AM
1

Ah. I can see where with the modern use of that terminology it could cause a major ruckus and confusion. I think I'll definitely avoid using it, just for the sake of clarity.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:36 PM
1

Or the fact that being a "man's man" is demonized. Femnazis attack men who actually like being an alpha and the values associated with traditional masculinity. Which is ridiculous. There's nothing wrong with it any more than with being a more sensitive man.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:57 AM
4

It definitely happens, especially with younger children. Thankfully I was old enough that the judge sat down with me in a room, assessed my ability to make decisions and went with what I wanted.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:49 AM
4

I wouldn't call anything about feminists (especially femnazis) conservative.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter