TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HappyVer Archive

View 3 posts and 156 comments by HappyVer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Racism is prejudice or discrimination against someone on the basis of race. Of course, it's not appropriate for a workplace to have a racial preference to hiring white people over black people. That's racism. If the same thing happens in relationships, that's also racism. Where in the definition of racism does it say it's not racism if it's a relationship, but it is racism if it's a job? The definition of the word racism doesn't say it only applies to things such as jobs, but it doesn't apply to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 08:51 AM
3

Perhaps by Red Pill lifestyle, OP is specifically referring to spinning plates? Can you clarify, OP? Regardless, Red Pill concepts definitely apply to women in their 30s and 40s at least. There are men who have used it with women in those age ranges. If you want, you can go try it out on 50 & 60+ y/o women and report back. If OP is 26, I think there will be other reasons those older women aren't into him though. Don't blame it on the Red Pill. See the other discussion here for a list of reasons:…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 07:34 AM
1

I didn't even realize YouTube allowed videos like the ones you linked. It's important to note that not all "try on haul" channels are like the ones you linked though, so I wouldn't necessary blame all "try on haul" videos. If you're specifically talking about the ones that contain nudity/see-through clothing like the ones you linked, then it's an interesting topic you bring up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 06:21 AM
7

The core concepts of the Red Pill aren't necessarily misogynistic in itself, however I feel some people in the Red Pill community can act in a misogynistic manner. Let me explain. The core concepts of Red Pill are based on evolutionary psychology. There is science behind human mating strategies. One of the earliest contributors to material in this area had a background in psychology. Red Pillers want to know how the game works and then use that understanding to play the game in the most effectiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 06:45 PM
4

There are different cultures around the world and there are different states/countries. There are plenty of cultures left where more traditional arranged marriages still take place (some parts of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East). In some parts of the world, there are still even uncontacted tribes that don't have electricity and still use bow and arrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 11:39 PM
3

Your original post specifically focuses on red pillers though. The equivalent for women is Female Dating Strategy (FDS). It would be interesting to know why you think women of FDS don't participate in the 4B movement or WGTOW. Why doesn't FDS go their own way? I feel that's the appropriate analogy. Nobody is denying that some men and women basically drop out of the dating market and just decide to stay single. I actually think FDS is more toxic than the red pill. FDS throws around more insults a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 09:05 PM
3

OP could ask the same question to women of FDS why they simply don't participate in the 4B movement or WGTOW. I think she'll get a similar answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 08:41 PM
1

Oh I see!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 12:35 AM
1

Oh I thought you wrote you're an amputee though.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 12:32 AM
2

Well, that lady from India in the story apparently had two hands transplanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 09:55 PM
3

That's so sad. Have you considered a hand transplant like that front page Reddit post https://np.reddit.com/r/BeAmazed/comments/1c5d7aj/an_indian_woman_who_lost_her_hands_received_a/ ? Or do you think that is impractical and the story exaggerates the simplicity and success rate?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 09:47 PM
15

While that may play a small role, that's not the main issue. It says "nearly half of all young people are single, with 34% being women and an astonishing 63% being men." If you look at the original study, when they say "young people," they're referring to 18 - 29 year olds. One of the main reasons for this is because older men outside of the 18 - 29 year old age range are dating younger women. This makes women from that 18 - 29 age range less likely to be single, and also men from that 18 - 29 a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 08:23 AM
69

For the flashing incident, in most states, it's actually legal for women to be topless as long as it's not for sexual reasons. Though it's arguable this was sexual in nature, it's legally not seen as bad as exposing genitals. The article you linked said she was in police HQ at the end, so she likely got charged with something.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 09:10 AM
10

I think it really depends on your details. When some men here think of the term "woman" they only think of women they find attractive. The women that are 20+ years older than them are invisible to them and they don't even think about their experiences. From friends I know that are 40+ years old, some of these women do have problems getting a serious monogamous relationship. Sometimes they get pumped and dumped. I know some that haven't had a boyfriend for years even though they're seriously look…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 10:24 PM
1

Which survey are you looking at? When I looked at the last survey, it said 73.3% of people here are 30 y/o or younger. I'm also surprised at how many virgins post here (i.e. put 0 as their n-count on the survey).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 08:55 PM
8

It seems like the average man on this subreddit is in their 20s, and has had a really bad love life, either without experiences or experiences that left him bitter and jaded. I completely agree. I feel it actually gives this sub a clear bias by having so many younger men here. Don't think all men are like the ones posting here. Younger men in their 20s are overrepresented here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 08:08 PM
1

Agreed it's different. I will explain why. Insults that can't be proven true or false are not defamation (by definition). An insult like bitch is never defamation. It's someone's opinion if they're a bitch or not. You can't prove it true or false. Being a "bad date" is your opinion and isn't defamation either. Just because it's mean, doesn't necessarily mean it's defamation. It's defamation if someone knowingly makes a false statement about someone and causes them harm. "Examples include claimin…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 08:24 PM
1

If someone disliked you and intentionally published false information online about you (to be found by all potential employers), you don't think you should have any recourse? Nowadays with AI, someone could even create a fake video of you doing something inappropriate/embarrassing and put it on social media or get it to the top of search results whenever someone searches for your name. You don't think defamation lawsuits should be a thing? I suppose if you want to go back in time before disputes…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 07:21 PM
3

People aren't necessarily saying they can't do anything about it. They could override certain biological urges with their mind, but I feel you would need to give them a good reason why they should do so. Is your problem primarily with the actual actions/behavior of these men, OR is your problem with how these men justify their actions from a biological perspective based on what some of their ancestors may have done? If it's the former, you would need to give a logical explanation why they should…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:13 AM
8

He's saying masculinity should be redefined from a focus on physical strength to intellectual capabilities (i.e. "mind over body"). He believes focusing on the physical is primitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 07:46 AM
5

A man who willingly adopts the caveman essentialist arguments to defend what's masculinity is detrimental to Men's Rights because they conflate redeeming masculinity with restoration of old values/times, in which language wasn't used and 'civilization' barely existed. Can you give some examples of how men do this? I'm talking about the average modern day man, not some extreme case of a man who committed a violent crime and ends up in prison. I feel you're blowing it way out of proportion by comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 07:37 AM
1

I know how much was actually paid. The case hurt her reputation and career and she had to pay a lot of legal fees. It cost her millions. The money is nothing to Johnny. He's rich. It's also a good warning that if she continues defaming him, she'll have to shell out even more, just like Trump keeps having to pay more and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 12:37 AM
-2

If she married you, then I wouldn't worry about it. She married you because you were the best option she felt was available. Some women are alpha widowed meaning they had an opportunity to date/have sex with a high value man, but the man had a variety of options and only wanted to have sex with her and wouldn't seriously commit to a real relationship with her. To put it another way, a guy (who is a 9) swiped right on her (who is a 7) and he pumped and dumped her, and now she thinks she's a 9 bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 12:32 AM
2

I feel it's biological but in the sense that people find younger women to be more attractive whereas older men could potentially be seen as more attractive than younger men. People value a woman's youthfulness more, which is why significantly more women often use makeup, skincare products, and get plastic surgery to make them look younger. Citations: Man's age vs. the age of women that look best to him: https://i.insider.com/54455482eab8ea361710fecc Woman's age vs. the age of men that look best …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 11:27 PM
1

It would be problematic because you can practice/study for IQ tests (which technically is supposed to make the results invalid). If you keep practicing the types of questions you get on IQ tests, you can learn to do them very well (though you're not necessarily actually more intelligent). The same kinds of questions & patterns pop up all the time on these tests. If it really mattered, we would have people start gaming the system.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 11:03 PM
1

My theory is that a lot of girls have experience either attempting to date or dating short boys who haven’t gone through puberty and don’t have a normal relationship, which is why we’re generally hardliners against dating shorter men. Don't you think a lot of guys also have the same experience with short girls yet the same thing doesn't work in reverse? Guys ask out and get rejected by shorter girls all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:58 PM
1

Okay...? What's the point you're trying to make?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:35 PM
2

OP said the case he posted was already dismissed. That's not the point of his post. He said the point of the post was to discuss lawsuits surrounding allegations that are factually untrue. Even if you think Depp v. Heard is irrelevant, there are plenty of others such as Carroll v. Trump. Defamation lawsuits can win.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:03 PM
1

If you simply had a bad dating experience, that's not a false statement in itself. As I said, it depends what was said. Sure, one could say it's a slippery slope, but at the same time, it's not right if someone goes around making false statements about you. How would you like it if someone did that to you? People can win defamation lawsuits. We've all seen instances of this in the news recently, such as with Depp v. Heard. If your statement is truthful, then you shouldn't have anything to worry …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:28 PM
4

I think the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard defamation case showed that you should expect to get sued if you go around lying about things to try and hurt someone's reputation. I would absolutely sue someone if they went around spreading lies like OP mentioned in the original post. How would you like it if someone falsely spread similar lies about you? If you're going to make a statement about someone, it should be a true statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:19 PM
-2

It depends on what "mean things" were said. If you're spreading lies about someone defaming them lying that they raped you, or falsely stating “he has a micropenis and watches scat porn,” you'd better expect to be sued. That's not right. How would you like it if people spread lies about you stating you abuse your children or that you abuse your husband just like Amber Heard? You don't think you should have any recourse? Most of us know the Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard defamation case. Lie like tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 07:43 PM
28

Men and women are obviously not the same in all aspects. Clearly there are physical differences. Perhaps it would be more interesting if there are specific aspects of equality you want to discuss where it's debated that men and women are equal? i.e. Equal in what way?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 01:22 PM
–

You're focusing too much on the "best sex" part. Just because someone is good at sex doesn't mean that partner is the best person to marry. Guys do this also. You don't choose a partner solely based on how good they were at sex. You choose based on a variety of factors. The people that have had the most sex in the past are more likely to be better at it, but you're probably not looking to marry the most promiscuous woman possible just because she's better at cowgirl.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 12:16 PM
0

I actually think we agree on most items regarding relationships. The main point we seem to disagree on is how this relates to the Monty Hall problem. To me, it seems you're just trying to illustrate that the men are usually the suitors and the women usually only choose from those who pursued them. I agreed with that part in my original response to you. Are you trying to illustrate more than that by referencing the Monty Hall problem? The main part of the problem that actually makes it a paradox …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 12:01 PM
1

You're conflating dating/sex vs. marriage. The most Red Pilled guys will have sex with or date the OnlyFans models, but they often just want to spin plates and have no intention of marrying them. I also hear from the Red Pilled guys that they don't want to marry women that work in the sex industry or are so promiscuous. Both can be true. It can differ depending on if you're just having sex with them and spinning plates vs. marrying them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 11:02 AM
3

The cutoff for women being able to reproduce is probably because of evolution. If an older woman were to get pregnant, it would increase her chance of death during pregnancy or childbirth, so the trait was naturally selected against. For example, a 60, 70, or 80+ year old woman being pregnant could potentially be a risk to her life. If all humans were to live longer, such as to 200 years, and we were relatively fit at 100 years old, we would probably evolve so that women could have children unti…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 09:20 PM
0

I'm specifically wondering how each part of the Monty Hall problem relates to relationships in your analogy. For example, perhaps you're implying the woman is choosing from the 2 doors in the Monty Hall problem. I disagree with this analogy because: In the Monty Hall problem, the car (what the person wants) is ALWAYS behind those two doors. In relationships, the person that the woman wants to be in a relationship with isn't necessarily one of those people that pursued her. In my example before, …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 05:33 PM
4

People don't exactly think of it like you're thinking of it. However, I do think the idea is ingrained into society in a different way. Parents do pressure their children to get into relationships before they get too old. When the children are in their 20s, parents might ask if they're dating to push them in that direction. When the children are in their 30s, parents might keep bugging their children asking when they're getting married or when they're going to give them grandchildren. When the c…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 08:06 PM
8

Don't take this as disagreement with you. I just want to clarify a few points. In the US, as early as 1862, women could have opened their own financial banking institutions to serve other women if they wanted. That's what happened in 1879 when Sarah Howe opened a bank called the Ladies' Deposit Company in Boston to serve women (though she ended up defrauding customers). There were other women's banks as well such as the First Woman’s Bank in Tennessee in 1919. Citation: https://daily.jstor.org/a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 06:26 AM
2

It's because women often mistake those dark triad traits with attractive traits. For example, a narcissist may come off as confident. A psychopath may come off as stoic. Confidence and stoicism may often be seen as attractive to women. Citation from the article The Sexual Appeal of Dark Personalities: "The men who were high in Dark Triad traits were rated as being significantly more attractive than the men who were low on them" "they are often mistaken for attractive traits" That's the main reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 04:37 AM
2

Depends on the study you're looking at. There are also studies that show the opposite. "Almost every woman thinks she's "hotter" than the average: Differences in self-assessments of physical attractiveness between women and men" "A random woman, compared to a random man, is 63% more likely to rate her looks higher" https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329327914_Almost_every_woman_thinks_she's_hotter_than_the_average_Differences_in_self-assessments_of_physical_attractiveness_between_women_and…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 03:05 PM
1

I didn't say there were. Sheryl Sandberg was recommending women date the "bad boys," but don't marry them because the traits that make bad boys sexy don't make them good husbands. Some people (including women) have certain preferences for sex/dating and a different preference for who they marry. Going back to your original contention that "the idea of men wanting traditional pure wives is false in reality," perhaps this explains it better: Some argue that men have an aversion to marrying promisc…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 09:59 PM
7

I think you're really over exaggerating this. I don't think it's rare to find a woman that's quite reasonable about this. If you feel used and taken advantage of, then don't date her anymore. It's a huge turn off for me if I feel the woman is taking advantage. I can imagine how terrible things would be like if I married a gold digger like that. That's not for me. When you use the phrase "Dating has become..." you make it sound like you believe things weren't like this in the past, but now they h…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 11:02 AM
1

You're implying that men get mad or go crazy over it, which is not true. Men indicate their preference, but we don't get mad or go crazy over it. What's wrong with having it as a preference? Men marry non-virgins all the time as well. Even if you personally believe men get mad or go crazy over it, that's irrelevant. It doesn't prove your original contention that "The idea of men wanting traditional pure wives is false in reality." Men's preference is similar to what Sheryl Sandberg suggested for…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 07:01 AM
1

It's not only men that say this. Sheryl Sandberg, former COO of Facebook, wrote in her book Lean In that her advice to women was: "When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands" That's basically the same thing you're accusing men of doing and how they want to have fun, but marry a more traditional wife who…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 09:19 PM
–

For anyone who thinks it's not true, as it says in https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513810000231 "Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices" "When searching for a mate, one must gather information to determine the mate value of potential partners. By focusing on individuals who have been previously chosen by others, one's selection of mates can be influenced by another's successful search—a phenomenon known as mate copying" Additionally, as it says in h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 12:05 PM
–

The classic example is the guy who they're already f*cking isn't 'emotionally available' which really just means she's not going to be getting a relationship out of him. He might be 'emotionally available' just not to HER. lol. Or he might be very emotionally intelligent around her, he just uses that to f*ck her and doesn't want to be in a relationship with her. Yes, very true. I'm glad others realize that when women use euphemisms like how the guy is "emotionally unavailable" or "not serious", …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:09 AM
1

I have no idea what you're so angry about. We were having a civilized debate. You're the one who made the reference to the Monty Hall problem and the onus is on you to explain how it applies in this situation. I've already told you why I think you're mistaken in my previous comment. All you have are insults in your response, not an explanation. You're the one in violation of Rule #2 of this sub. Your basic options are: 1) Actually explain your position as to how you believe the Monty Hall proble…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 09:09 AM
3

That's fair. Though I feel from the items you list, people dating in their own country (not being passport bros) could also similarly be dishonest about those items to the same degree, right? Which of those items you list do you think passport bros are least likely to be honest about?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 07:07 AM
5

You state that some of these passport bros are using their leverage (such as income) to take advantage of women. What if you were basically in the situation of the woman? Let's say a man that was wealthier and more educated than you wanted to date/marry you (basically a similar power imbalance as with the passport bros)? Would they be taking advantage of you? Is that situation okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 06:12 AM
2

Do you think you should be banned from dating/marrying guys that make a certain amount more money than you (e.g. 5 times the amount) since there would be a power imbalance between you and the guy? Is this situation okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:44 AM
6

Do you think you should be banned from dating/marrying guys that make a certain amount more money than you (e.g. 5 times the amount) since there would be a power imbalance between you and the guy? Is this situation okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:43 AM
4

Do you think you should be banned from dating/marrying guys that make a certain amount more money than you (e.g. 5 times the amount) since there would be a power imbalance between you and the guy? Is this situation okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:39 AM
7

Assuming you're talking about the country, it's spelled Colombia.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:21 AM
9

I agree. When people cite statistics like this, people know they're being intentionally misleading. It weakens the message if people feel you're being disingenuous. Even when people cite rape statistics, people already know that it's greatly inflated to make it sound like a huge problem. It dilutes the severity of these terms and trivializes it for those that actually are victims of serious crimes. When they create the statistic, they often use a very broad definition of rape/sexual assault/sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 09:37 PM
1

When you cherry pick when picking starts sure. Men pick from all available women, women pick from the men willing to date her. I agree. Yes it does. Picking from a group of objects you want has a much higher success rate than picking from all objects. You should learn about the Monty Hall problem. Women pick from 2 doors, men pick from 3. I am aware of the Monty Hall problem. That's not how the math works out in this scenario at all. First of all, there aren't only 2 or 3 doors, and there's no m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 10:20 PM
4

Men are expected to do the approaching, and 99.99% of the time the woman will reject him Exaggerating much? If you're actually getting rejected 9999 out of 10000 approaches, you probably need to change something.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 09:23 PM
4

You can think about two platonic friends (such as two guys) that go to get drinks or dinner. I always think the expectation is that we'll split it. I feel it should be the same if it's a man and a woman going out also. It's not that I necessarily mind paying for everything under certain circumstances (even if I'm just doing something with a friend platonically). However, I don't want there to be an expectation that it's my responsibility to pay for everything though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 08:46 PM
1

I asked a Korean person living in Seoul, South Korea about this and even showed him an article about it. He said he's never heard of it. Perhaps the movement itself is not as popular as some might think.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 11:18 AM
83

After thinking about it, that's an interesting point actually. Basically, the more women you have in the relationship, the more likely divorce is going to happen. Divorce rates based on one study mentioned on this LGBT friendly site: Gay divorce (2 men; 0 women in couple): 15% Heterosexual divorce (1 man; 1 woman in couple): 18% Lesbian divorce (0 men; 2 women in couple): 30% Maybe men should be seen as less of the problem. It seems the more men you have in the relationship, the lower the divorc…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 08:04 PM
4

I agree with most of what you say. However, when you say "It isn't considered real," I'm actually surprised some people say it's not real. I think it's important to understand the definition of friendzone https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/friendzone . Nobody is saying you're intentionally putting someone in the friendzone, but the concept still exists. Additionally, I don't think it's right to consider him a creep. The guy on the other side is a real person with real feelings. Just like…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 07:41 AM
7

Being friends takes effort from both sides. You don't have to be their friend. That's YOUR choice. Don't try and make it sound like you're forced into being someone's friend. It's your choice to cut ties. It'll probably be best for your mental health if you go no contact. Some women want to keep guys around as a "backup" or "orbiter" even if they don't think of it in those terms ( https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/wiki/terms/#wiki_beta_orbiters ). If their preferred guys don't work out, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 07:08 AM
1

Wouldn't you say most people that have a family, wife, and kids (as in your examples) have achieved some level of companionship and love? How will the guy in your example chase more companionship if he already has a wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 08:37 AM
3

In the two examples you mention people that are unhappy and miserable that "have a family" and have "wives and kids." However, in the end, you suggest we chase "companionship" and "love." Are you suggesting that your examples don't have companionship and love even though you mention they have a family, wife and kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 08:21 AM
2

Okay, got it. I agree that there's a limit to what would be considered defense. The video doesn't say he continued to fight when the opponent yielded or fled though. In the video he only agreed that it was done "purely in defense." What I'm saying is only based on the video posted. I don't have further information about what actually happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 04:27 AM
3

Yes. If you disagree, please explain. Even in your link, it says nothing regarding it being synonymous with doing something in defense.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 04:06 AM
14

The problem is that Dr. Phil said to the guy "you say she has come at you, she has attacked you, and that often times you have done what you have done purely in defense." He responds, "yes." Then later Dr. Phil berates the guy repeating several times "never, ever put your hands on a woman in anger." Him doing it in self defense is different from him doing it in anger. The guy didn't say he put his hands on her in anger. He said he was attacked by her and did it in defense. That's an inappropriat…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 02:22 AM
1

I'm not necessarily saying I refer to promiscuous women that way either, but if some other men have done so in the past, you should know the women of FDS use similar language towards men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:25 PM
2

We're not necessarily saying they're not physically attractive anymore. If you're saying there are guys you've happily fucked that you wouldn't date, it's probably because there are some attributes they have that make them undateable, but you don't care so much about those attributes if you're just having sex (e.g. maybe you think he's hot, but uneducated). If a guy used the terms "She's for the streets", "For recreational use only", "Low value woman" (as in your original post), they're saying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 03:05 PM
5

It's as I said in my original comment. You keep conflating the bar for fuckable vs. the bar for a serious relationship. You would shake a guy's hand or hug him even if you wouldn't have sex with him, right? Why? It's because the bar is different. For guys, the bar for fuckable is different. We view them as bad in the sense that we might not see them as marriage material, not that the act of sex would necessarily be terrible. Don't conflate the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 02:01 PM
10

Because it feels good because the body releases chemicals such as dopamine. Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 01:37 PM
6

There's a difference between having sex with someone and having a relationship/marrying someone. Women too often conflate the two. For guys, just because he would have sex with her, it doesn't mean he sees her as serious relationship/marriage material. The bar for fuckable is a lot lower. Don't get an inflated ego just because someone would fuck you, but they wouldn't marry you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 01:31 PM
7

You even wrote here https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomenNoCensor/comments/1b94lhw/women_who_have_dated_abusive/ktu5olz/ that you're FWBs with said doctor and lawyer. My current two FWBs are a (crit care) doctor and a (corporate) lawyer. I concur with /u/funfacts_82 that you're not dating. The F in FWB stands for friends. That's fine if that's what you're looking for, but don't lie about it. For guys, there's a big difference between the bar for fuckable and wifeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 02:42 PM
43

South Korea’s birth rate halved as a result of this movement gaining traction That's not true. First of all, how did it halve? Secondly, Korea has always had a declining birth rate for the last three decades. The birth rate decline has actually slowed (not increased) since 2019 when the 4B movement started. Birth rate decline was faster in 2014 - 2018. The 4B movement started in 2019. From 2019 - present, the birth rate decline per year is not as bad as historically. Year Birth Rate Growth Rate …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 06:50 PM
29

Didn't even think of that. Apparently!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 06:08 PM
34

It doesn't matter. Women also called for all other women to go on a sex strike for various other reasons in the past and nothing really happened. It's never worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 06:01 PM
2

Why is it bad for society?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 09:16 AM
1

Okay. Thank you for clarifying!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 06:44 AM
2

complimentary and synergetic character of male/female relationships has largely disappeared Can you explain what exactly you mean by this and why it has largely disappeared?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 05:30 AM
3

I concur I feel everything isn't necessarily as bad as this sub keeps saying. There just seem to be a lot of bitter people on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 05:11 AM
1

That is an extreme case, but it happens at a smaller scale all the time. The wall is just indicating how many women inherently know they're most desirable in their 20s or early 30s and that would be the best time for them to marry the highest value man possible, otherwise their options will not be as good later on. For example, one of my single friends said she "wants to get married soon before all the good guys are taken." <-- this is really just a euphemism for the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 07:08 PM
-1

That's not true. Scientists can create artificial wombs, but right now they're generally held back by ethics. Right now there's "a 14-day rule prevents human embryos from being kept in artificial wombs longer than 14 days." They've done it for animals to grow lamb fetuses, but they stop growing them after 4 weeks for ethical reasons. If human extinction was at risk and ethics were thrown out the window, I'm pretty sure scientists would agree the artificial womb would be the easy part. The egg/sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 11:52 AM
6

I can agree that seems to be accurate. Even in the linked study in OPs post, it says: 76% of women said they were the ones who ended it. 62% of men said they were the ones who ended it. It's really not that far off, even according to the linked study.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 12:41 AM
9

women can have a baby without men or their sperm right now This is just research, not something that can be done today. It literally says in the article "some scientists doubt that Nayernia’s engineered sperm could ever be functional enough to inseminate an egg successfully."
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 12:09 AM
8

I see a lot of proposals on this sub for socially/government-enforced nuclear families forcing people to breed and even taking women's jobs away to make them sit at home and breed all day (despite 74% of healthcare workers being women) Can you link me to all these proposals on this sub? Specifically the ones regarding taking women's jobs away and forcing them to breed all day. I seriously haven't seen these proposals.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 12:01 AM
9

Here, I think a lot of men also have an implied bias where even the word “woman” only brings to mind the attractive young lady he would like to bang. The woman who’s been working at the post office longer than he’s been alive, the lady with the mobility scooter at the grocery store, they’re not “women” to them so, in their minds, they’ll still date any breathing woman. This is absolutely true. There are numerous articles out there about women who feel "invisible." At first, I didn't believe it, …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:07 AM
4

To a certain extent, yes. However, I've seen women get even more emotional and upset regarding their relationships. I've seen women who also seemed to derive their self-esteem from their relationships and got upset if she saw someone else's partner do something that she wasn't getting (e.g. flowers delivered on Valentine's/birthday or a ring) I was discussing something similar with a woman once and it seemed men cared more about the physical, whereas women got more emotional. But from my experie…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:16 AM
2

Well, with that kind of a response, I'm not sure what exactly you disagree on regarding the wall. Men generally find women to be less attractive as they get older. The younger women (who men find attractive) will get the high value men leaving older women with not as many good options to choose from. I feel women already know it's ideal for them to get married in their 20s or early 30s, otherwise their options will not be as good later on. What specifically do you disagree on regarding the wall?…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 07:42 AM
–

Until a guy starts bringing something to the table to match female sexuality his opinions about these women does not count. What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:46 PM
–

Okay, but this does speak for a wide variety of men & women: https://i.insider.com/54455482eab8ea361710fecc https://i.insider.com/54455482ecad04a7637efb7a From Dataclysm. Men of all ages find women in their 20s to be most attractive. Biology and natural selection determined that men find women that are more fertile to be attractive. Men are attracted to fertile women that are more likely to produce successful offspring. Attraction decreases as fertility decreases. It's not a conscious choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:44 PM
–

Do you believe Red Pill is toxic? If so, how is it toxic in ways that FDS isn't toxic?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:26 PM
–

I would expect nothing less from someone with your username and flair! How has it destabilized society, subjected humans to indignities, and let to psychological suffering?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:18 PM
–

Do you have some examples?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:01 PM
1

I'm saying why not hang out with someone if it's a good time? I would hang out with friends and family because it's a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 01:19 PM
1

You believe "There is no wall" and "‘The Wall’ is a construct invented by insecure men..." You also believe this is some modern concept that porn helped create. The concept of a woman being seen as less likely to be marriage material after a certain age isn't something new. If you go back centuries (or even longer), they had similar ideas and called this being a spinster or old maid. The younger women (who men find attractive) will get the high value men leaving older women with not as many good…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 12:26 PM
1

A feminist described it to me once saying feminists believe women should be able to express their sexuality just like men and sleep around like men since feminists don't believe in the double standard that exists in society where it's seen as unacceptable for women to do that. Yes, she did practice what she preached.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 09:26 AM
1

Why not? I might not be sure yet. Just like it's a positive thing to go hang out with friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 03:08 AM
2

You can try and throw insults around, but it doesn't change the biological facts. You keep trying to deny the wall, when the concept underlying it isn't even new. It dates back centuries (if not longer) when terms like "spinster" or "old maid" were used. Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines spinster as "an unmarried woman and especially one past the common age for marrying; a woman who seems unlikely to marry." In real life, I've actually only heard women use the term "spinster." These underlying …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 05:49 PM
4

Data shows that "Globally, Men and Women Are Equally Lonely": https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/512618/almost-quarter-world-feels-lonely.aspx
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 06:45 AM
1

They will if the man's RMV is high. For example, Leonardo DiCaprio is 49 and continuously dates 20 year olds and then dumps them when they turn 25, and then finds a new 20 year old: https://i.redd.it/jtmyrtyqmcl21.png Or how Donald Trump's been married several times, currently to a woman 24 years younger. I also know guys who are pretty average and have dated women 15+ years younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 04:34 AM
1

I'm not sure if you don't fully understand what the wall is or you're just denying it. The wall isn't really that offensive of a concept. It's just biology. I feel it's already something that women inherently understood even before the term was used. Women just express the concept in different terms - for example, one of my single friends said she "wants to get married soon before all the good guys are taken." <-- this is really just a euphemism for the wall, and this concept existed even before…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 04:00 AM
1

I agree. I'm not saying no men are attracted to older women. However, you have to realize this is reality (CHARTS: Guys Like Women In Their Early 20s Regardless Of How Old They Get): https://i.insider.com/54455482eab8ea361710fecc https://i.insider.com/54455482ecad04a7637efb7a https://www.businessinsider.com/dataclysm-shows-men-are-attracted-to-women-in-their-20s-2014-10
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 07:31 PM
1

I agree, but what determined what men find attractive? Biology and natural selection determined that men find women that are more fertile to be attractive. Men are attracted to fertile women that are more likely to produce successful offspring. Attraction decreases as fertility decreases. It's not a conscious choice. If there was a man that had genes that made him most attracted to older women in their 50s, those genes would be naturally selected out and not carried on to the next generation sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 06:12 PM
1

But again, to reiterate OPs point, he's not saying you will be sexually irrelevant when you hit the wall. He states in his post: "Guys would hit on the 20 y/o girl next door and a 35 y/o, but they are on different categories. The 20 y/o he'll take seriously and the 35 y/o could be just to smash." This is true. Some guys might still try to have sex with you after you hit the wall, but it doesn't mean they're as likely to see you as relationship/marriage material.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:05 AM
8

I agree with #1. For #2, I'm sure women really love waiting around for an extensive period of time when they're 35.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 07:56 AM
2

I agree with the post, except for the "isn't fertile anymore" part. I completely agree women too often conflate being able to get sex with being desirable for committed relationships/marriage. The two are not the same. I think too many women intentionally misinterpret "the wall" as meaning a woman's value magically goes from high to low overnight at a specific age. That's not what "the wall" means. The concept of the wall just means that a woman's Relationship Market Value (RMV) declines a lot a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 07:53 AM
2

What you're saying doesn't contradict what he wrote in the post though. He said "Guys would hit on the 20 y/o girl next door and a 35 y/o, but they are on different categories. The 20 y/o he'll take seriously and the 35 y/o could be just to smash" Which is true to some extent. You're putting too much weight on the sex part and not the committed relationship/marriage part. The two are separate things. Just because a guy would have sex with a woman, doesn't mean he would wife her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 07:26 AM
2

I agree it's more likely to happen to older women, but I would say it's based on a person's Relationship Market Value, not just age. A man doesn't only solely take into account the person's age. He will take a variety of factors into account. It can happen to women of all ages. It's just a bit more pronounced in that example. I'm just trying to illustrate that when we talk about "pickier," it completely depends whether we're talking about just dates/sex or we're talking about a committed relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 12:47 PM
1

Dating vs. a committed long term relationship are different things. For example, on this page a woman writes: "I’m a Single Mom Who Is Ready To Give Up On Men Because They All Want Sex" "I have no shortage of “dates”." "we usually go on a few dates, everything is going wonderful… but nobody ever COMMITS" As others say, women are the gatekeepers to sex, but men are the gatekeepers to relationships/marriage. Just because a woman can get a date/sex, it doesn't mean they can get a relationship/marri…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 12:22 PM
1

Do you hold the same standard if a platonic friend who's a woman invites you to go to do something (e.g. get dinner or drinks)? You would expect them to pay? However, I was reading one of your other posts where you suggested "how you’re really hungry but low on cash, how you’d love to stay for the date but you cannot pay" - I feel that is actually a legit reason for me at least. If I feel a person I'm hanging out with (male or female) legitimately can't afford it or it's a burden on them, then I…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 10:02 AM
0

If you don't like equality, you can go blame feminists. I still haven't heard a convincing argument against fairly splitting the check. The best you can do at this point are insults?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 09:12 AM
0

Perfect! More women should state that up front to help men weed the gold diggers out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 08:45 AM
3

Accepting a date is completely different than being in a serious committed relationship with that person. Accepting a date can lead to sex, which is why men don't mind accepting the date. Being in a committed monogamous relationship with that person is a different story since that means not having sex with other potential sex partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:02 PM
6

The preference for younger women comes from biology and natural selection. Men are attracted to fertile women that are more likely to produce successful offspring. Attraction decreases as fertility decreases. It's not a conscious choice. While I wouldn't necessarily define "the wall" as 29, there is scientific evidence to show that once women are less fertile, men's attraction to them decreases. That's where the concept of the wall is from. If there was a man that had genes that made him most at…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:39 PM
0

The scale is useless if "all women are 10's." I think we should use a scale based on percentiles. For example, out of all the women in the world, what percentile would you be in? Not everyone can claim to be in the 99th percentile.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:31 PM
1

The operating costs for a restaurant are built into the price of the food. Some restaurants state on their menus up front that there's an additional surcharge fee charged. I'm not even sure I understand your analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:09 PM
2

It's just dumb. The scale is useless if "all women are 10's." The 1 - 10 scale isn't well defined. I think we should use a scale based on percentiles. For example, out of all the women in the world, what percentile would you be in? Not everyone can claim to be in the 99th percentile.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:10 AM
12

Okay, but that's not what everyone was taught by their father. Maybe someone's father taught their children equality and to fairly split the check. Why are you trying to pressure men into paying with your insults?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:43 AM
3

It's not, but I could ask you the same question - is fairly splitting the check that big of a deal? It's important that it's not a given that the man always pays, otherwise it will result in the man getting taken advantage of. Sure, he can pay if he wants, but that should be completely his decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:23 AM
1

Having fuck buddies is totally different from a serious monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:06 AM
4

So if you were in your 20s and single, you would be looking at the same level guys as if you were in your 50s and single? Do you think a person's standards change relative to their own value?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:06 AM
24

Then it doesn't make sense for OP to make up fake statistics like "90% of men..." when a majority of men aren't even single. As stated, about 60% of men are married or cohabitating (i.e. have a wife or live with their long term partner).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 12:27 AM
-3

I know you're upset, and I'm sorry the world works this way, but men are just biologically attracted to younger women. I know you're still in the denial and anger stage, but you will eventually reach acceptance. I'm sorry and I wish you the best. Citation: https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/dVqM-IoT9j01u0OEMWWhN_ck-ec=/0x0:751x802/750x800/media/img/posts/2018/08/Screen_Shot_2018_08_09_at_2.52.05_PM/original.png
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:14 AM
3

Their minimum standards for what though? Sex or a monogamous long term relationship? Yes, men's standards for sex are lower. Many people say women are the gatekeepers to sex, while men are the gatekeepers to marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 12:43 AM
5

Women's standards are inflated for a variety of reasons. Some higher value guys (e.g. a 8) don't have a problem swiping right on lower value women (e.g. a 5) and having sex with them, even though they'll probably ultimately not be serious about having a long term monogamous relationship with them. This makes those women have an inflated sense of value. Now that they've dated/slept with guys that are 8's, it makes them think their own value is a 8 and that they deserve to be with an 8, even thoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 09:29 AM
–

Looking at your post history, you're mainly here to advertise your low quality YouTube videos full of crappy stock footage? I suggest you work on making higher quality content.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 08:35 AM
4

In choosing the man for what? Sex or relationship/marriage? Regardless, the women usually only choose from the pool of men that pursued them in the first place. The man that they prefer might not be in that pool since those men never pursued them in the first place. That's why the science & math shows the suitors are more likely to get their higher preference. Absolutely. The women usually still only choose from the pool of men that pursued them in the first place. This is not true. Men are stil…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 01:22 AM
6

some of you might disagree with the premise of women being the gatekeepers to sex. But for the sake of argument, let’s assume that they are and that they carry the responsibility of choosing “the right man”. I agree with the premise of women being the gatekeepers to sex. However, it doesn't mean they fully carry the responsibility of choosing the right partner. Men are often considered the suitors (i.e. they ask the women out and pursue the women). Women accept this offer or don't. Aside from hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 12:47 AM
0

You can't really tell by only looking at success rate. There are some people I know with very high success rates, but it's because they only have the confidence to go for lower tier partners. This isn't necessarily ideal. There are some people I know with lower success rates, but it's because they often go for the most attractive partners (and often fail, but sometimes succeed). Some people would prefer that 5% chance of being with a 9 instead of a 50% chance of being with a 6.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 08:56 PM
2

There's a difference between sex and a monogamous committed relationship. Yes, men have lower standards for having sex with someone. However, they have higher standards for who they will have a monogamous committed relationship with (i.e. be their boyfriend or get married). The reason is that once the man enters into a monogamous committed relationship, that means he isn't supposed to have sex with other women anymore. Men prefer not to give that up. That's why when it comes time to enter a more…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 06:57 AM
1

I'm not saying looks aren't important. There are many things that come into play, including looks. I'm just saying financial resources can play a role and affect other aspects of your game such as increase your status.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 07:59 AM
1

Perhaps. Here's an example of what I'm talking about: https://i.insider.com/5db36222dee019314343a5b6 is what Elon Musk looked like a long time ago. With his money, it's reported he's had cosmetic surgery (https://www.vanityestetik.com/en/blog/elon-musk-before-and-after-plastic-surgery-journey/) and hair transplant surgery and he started dressing better and has now had enough sex to make 11 kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 05:07 AM
1

Well I made the average American's annual income in just one week last week How would you say having this money is beneficial in regards to relationships? Also, you didn't say how you used your money to bring in more women. Just keeping it in the bank won't necessarily be helpful. In addition to the ways I previously mentioned regarding using it to improve physical appearance, you could also use the money to make it appear your status is higher. Do you have a fancy car? Do you have a fancy home?…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 03:38 AM
2

That's fine if that's your preference. The money aspect isn't absolutely required. People who aren't wealthy have casual relationships also. However, having financial resources isn't going to hurt. If you're wealthy, that can affect your physical attractiveness. You could buy a high quality outfit & accessories; have your hair done well or even get hair transplant surgery; afford a personal trainer at the gym, etc. My guess is if you have specific people in mind that you'd consider having casual…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 02:02 AM
0

First of all, who doesn't want money. Secondly, casual sex doesn't necessarily mean you only have sex with the person one time. It could be an ongoing thing with that same person. I don't know why you used the term sugar baby. I'm not talking about paying the girl. It could be a FWB or other casual relationship. It's similar to why it's beneficial to have money if you're dating someone. Having wealth can make you appear more attractive. What home are you going to bring them back to if you don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 01:35 AM
1

I agree men are less interested in caring for a newborn alone. Even professional fields that involve childcare or early childhood education are dominated by women because men are less interested in doing it. That's my point though. If men are childfree, I feel it's also very likely by choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 12:39 AM
4

Interesting point. I hadn't looked into it before, but now that I look it up, it does seem that reliable birth control caused the sexual revolution and is responsible for the increase in casual/premarital sex since it significantly decreased the risk involved. Now I understand why some very conservative people are against birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 02:04 PM
5

Yes, I concur. American men can be passport bros since men care more about a woman's physical appearance and personality. They care less about her current socioeconomic status or income since men aren't so much looking for a woman to support him, and he can basically elevate her to his level anyway if he brings her to the US. The foreign women often like American men since they're wealthier than the men in their country and can help them get US citizenship. It'd be much harder for American women…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 11:22 AM
1

If men really wanted, they could just get a gestational surrogate to have a child just like gay couples do when they want a child. However, I feel men usually don't do it because they feel that there's no time limit and they could always have children later in life. Men don't really get a sense of urgency that time is running out. It's also arguable that women have more of an innate desire to raise children just like how in most other species the mother feels the biological need to take care of …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 02:59 AM
4

Yes, you can. I think you're stuck on the fact that different people have different preferences. The same thing can happen in another market (think of how the market determines the value of an iPhone even though some people prefer other phones). You can place people in the market based on how desirable they are. I'm sure many ladies here would love to be in a relationship with Leonardo DiCaprio. A lot of ladies like him, and I'm sure there are some that don't. Regardless, he is very desirable an…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:23 PM
4

It's both. Why do you think it's one or the other? It is a market. In this marketplace, most participants make decisions based on their own personal romantic feelings. If a lot of attractive people like a specific person (for whatever reason, including personal romantic feelings), that person's value in the market is likely to be higher. That person is very desirable. If nobody likes that specific person, that person's value in the market is low. That person is not desirable. You would have a ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:30 PM
1

They often brought middle eastern men as a blueprint of how men should spoil women In Muslim countries in the Middle East, they're allowed to have up to 4 wives as long as they can take care of all of them. In some places in the Middle East, women's rights aren't so great. I'm sure some men here would love to import Middle Eastern culture to the West so they can have 4 wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 05:29 PM
2

I know people are attracted to what they can’t have People are not always attracted to what they can't have. I will not give you a bottle of my bodily fluids, but it doesn't mean you're going to start wanting it just because you can't have it. ​ If humans are extremely loss averse Who says humans are extremely loss averse? I'm sure she would prefer not to lose you, but that loss isn't nearly large enough to force her to go out with you if she doesn't want that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 08:55 AM
–

Okay fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 10:43 AM
–

Okay, care to explain? You previously stated "They're the passive actors they would't be looking for one they just expect it to appear." Though wouldn't you say the act of a woman creating a dating app profile and using the app and taking the time to swipe through profiles would be considered actively "looking for one" and not "just expecting it to appear"? That act is not as passive as people meeting in-person where a man needs to take the initiative to go up to a woman, talk to her, and court …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 10:12 AM
–

That's interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:46 AM
–

I think it's better to tell your partner what you'll do. You try to work it out, and if you can't reach a resolution, it's better to blatantly tell them (in a nice way) that you'll have sex with other people since they're not meeting your sexual needs. I don't think it's cheating if you tell them ahead of time that you no longer agree to sexual monogamy with them (but perhaps you want to keep the other aspects of the marriage).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:45 AM
0

I understand that historically when people met each other in-person, women were more passive and men were often the suitors in relationships. Nowadays with dating apps, are women really that passive? To some extent, the actions a woman takes in a dating app are similar to the actions a man takes (i.e they both create a profile advertising they're single, they both swipe right, they both message each other). Do you think that today with dating apps they're just as passive as historically?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 08:27 AM
1

Not necessarily. However, there's ambiguity in the statement. Ultimately in reality, men won't be a fan of the statement (even if they pretend to support it to be politically correct). It's just like how women would also not support the saying "the future is male."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:10 AM
1

Why can't men's priorities be considered an honest intention? Stop trying to demonize male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:06 AM
9

I can see what you're trying to get at. I might slightly agree. However, I disagree with the following: In the first example, you're talking about someone interpreting someone else's non-verbal communication. One could argue that the person trying to communicate the message (i.e. the sender of the message) bears some responsibility for correctly communicating it in a manner that ensures the recipients understand the message. i.e. if someone "wants to leave" or "is trying to get someone's attenti…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:42 AM
1

If men as a collective woke up and said, "hey women, you have no rights... I disagree this could reasonably happen. Just like there were some women that once said that if all women stopped having sex with men, then they would be able to force change. Then one woman called for other women to do that, and nothing happened. It's not reasonably possible that a man would be able to get all other men to do something like this. Just like it's not reasonably possible that a woman could get all other wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 08:52 AM
22

There was a New York Times article and several studies that showed that when the one child policy was in effect, many parents didn't necessarily kill their newborn daughters, they just hid them from the government (meaning they're alive but not counted in the official numbers). This has caused some of those undocumented girls to now have problems going to university or getting a job. That is what the article and the studies were reporting on. There are many undocumented women in China that aren'…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 04:32 PM
2

I would recommend you change fields ASAP. The people who are successful at computer science are the geeks who really love every aspect of it and spend a significant amount of their free time on it just because they want to learn everything about it. I know several people who got degrees in computer science, but their heart was never into it. They never put in that extracurricular time, so they weren't really too good at it and were never able to get a job in the field. Any field could potentiall…
/r/askTRP10/03/21 09:24 AM
1

I didn't. She had heard of it before and brought it up on her own, but I don't think she knew many details. I also said I didn't know much about it.
/r/askTRP14/07/20 04:49 PM
37

FWB
/r/askTRP13/07/20 11:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter