TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Harnisfechten Archive

View 0 posts and 95 comments by Harnisfechten on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"OMG HOW DARE YOU TRY TO CONTROL WOMENS SEXUALITY WE CAN HAVE SEX ITS NATURAL TO WANT SEX WE'RE ALLOWED TO HAVE SEX WHENEVER"
/r/MensRights17/04/20 11:38 AM
0

I am the polar opposite of both those things you're calling me. you're delusional.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 06:57 PM
0

yeah, you can be compared when you're acting like them. act like an adult. Not all women are trash, just like not all men are trash. You don't get to sit there and whine about feminists being mean to you when you turn around and say "there are no good women, they are all the same (ie. bad)".
/r/MensRights04/03/20 05:23 PM
0

I mean, a lot of men are garbage too. Probably the same percentages really.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 01:09 PM
0

that's just as silly as some man-hating feminazi who says all men are pigs and thinks all men are trash. you're exactly the thing you hate.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 01:08 PM
24

I mean, that's not true. there ARE good women out there.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 08:24 PM
3

you don't need catchphrases and buzzwords and propaganda to tell the truth.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 08:09 PM
1

that might be something different. I'm sure 20% of couples have 80% of the sex, but I'd also bet that 10% of men are getting 50% of the hookups.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 01:22 PM
1

the proportion probably varies.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:17 PM
2

I don't think they can make you go. if you have the assault on video, seems obvious to me. you shouldn't be covering for her dude. wtf. she's crazy. leave her. protect yourself and your kid. You should have let her get arrested. And you shouldn't have called to try and get her out of going to therapy - she should be forced to go.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 08:34 PM
6

it's just Price's Law. 10% of men will be accounting for 50% of the sex. the other 50% of sex will be divided among the remaining 90% of men.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 08:32 PM
1

A public business has a legal obligation to not discriminate those that do can face legal action and jail. It's so sad in 2020 I'm having to explain why having a sign on your door saying no Irish is wrong. you're conflating the law with morality. I agree that it's morally wrong. and yes, we all know what the current law is. What you want is the opposite on freedom you want society to be split into small groups that only serve their gender or race. So ridiculous. freedom doesn't mean people will …
/r/MensRights18/02/20 07:03 PM
1

no that's the point. they should have that right. a person has the right to choose who they interact/assemble/associate with. They should not be compelled by force of the law into associating with people against their will.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:58 PM
1

Business only officers services to X gender or X race I have massive issues with. you may not like it, but they should have that right. I'm for equality I'm not going to support anything that affects peoples needs e.g. if I'm a woman and I have a barber next door and I have hair shorter than men but I can't go as it's a men only space so I have to go across town and be charged £40 for the same thing. I find that wrong, it goes against my morals that's fine. you're allowed to not like it. But you…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:53 PM
1

And you don't get to illegally discriminate based on gender. law = rights. are we talking legal, or moral? You say women only gyms are bad well so are men only barbers. I don't say that women-only gyms are bad. the double-standard is bad. everyone should have freedom of assembly. every business should be free to offer services (or refuse to serve) whoever they want.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:59 PM
2

"i'm a trans-woman who is starting transition tomorrow"
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:54 PM
2

my missus gyms with me and she struggles to workout without being stared at or approached nice humble-brag lol
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:50 PM
1

she can drop him off?
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:49 PM
0

Men only groups are needed, places where issues facing men like medical conditions that only affect men can be openly discussed and everyone can relate. Or issues like children and metal health. you don't get to decide for men what is important. you also don't get to decide when/if men get a safe space.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:46 PM
1

I think it can be evaluated in a case-by-case basis it can't, and it shouldn't. the right to freedom of assembly is important. government should get no say in who I choose to interact with or refuse to interact with.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:45 PM
1

it's not imposing religion on others to refuse to cater a gay wedding.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:43 PM
1

blaming the right for the fact that the left has been demonizing men for decades
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:39 PM
1

they should have that right, actually. they'd get boycotted, they'd be eliminating some of their potential customers, and it would just make the store next door that does serve black people/jews more competitive.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:32 PM
1

yes and business owners should be under no legal obligation to be forced to serve ANYONE.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:31 PM
15

typically they "model" on instagram, but maintain another private website, or use something like snapchat, and will sell nudes.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 07:22 PM
1

And those laws are TOTALLY fair to the people and all the murderers and thieves are always caught! /s uh, what? the fact that some criminals aren't caught has NOTHING to do with the fairness of a law. Anyone caught up with what is legal and not focusing on what is actually fair and right, is already just plain in the wrong. yes, and making it illegal for single men to adopt, while it's legal for single women to adopt, is immoral and wrong. No man is ENTITLED to fatherhood. Just as no woman is en…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:13 PM
1

it legit doesn't matter if it is sexist in this case is what I'm saying. it doesn't matter if a law is sexist? I think no laws are fair toward anyone really? how about "murder isn't allowed". that's pretty fair to everyone. How about "stealing isn't allowed". That's fair to everyone.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 12:59 PM
4

I don't think most people should raise kids. dodge. And the reason women haven't been banned is because they haven't been reported but they are not equally abusive that's empirically false. Men violently sexually abuse children more often source? ENOUGH that they pay well for opportunity if they can, and should just accept that maybe a tiny chunk the world just isn't fucking fair for that reason. black people in the US commit murders at a disproportionately higher rate than white people do. So..…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 09:09 PM
3

ok so you agree that it's sexist for that law to ban men from adopting children but not also ban women. cool.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 09:07 PM
3

ok so would you support single women also not being allowed to adopt children?
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:40 PM
4

I'm SO fucking tired of our argument being "what about shitty women". It's not a good argument. you're tired of people using your logic against you? so would you agree with banning single women from adopting kids because sometimes women abuse kids, and women need to be responsible for that?
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:38 PM
5

are women responsible for the women who are abusers?
/r/MensRights05/02/20 04:51 PM
5

what about shitty women who abuse kids? why is it not also illegal for a single woman to adopt a child?
/r/MensRights05/02/20 04:49 PM
2

sure probably. I've had that happen to me too. Both sexes have to deal with it.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 01:21 PM
1

in my experience at least, women get treated very differently at car dealerships and garages than men do. and before you start going off on me, I'm about the furthest thing from some crazy radical feminazi, I support men's rights, I support true equality. But to deny that there's ever any differential treatment between men and women is stupid. It goes both ways though.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 02:36 PM
6

try applying to any kind of office/admin job as a male. you don't stand a chance against a women applying.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 02:04 PM
1

I mean, go to a car dealership, or a car mechanic. male privilege, in that sense, does exist. it's just that female privilege also exists. it's not a story of oppressor vs oppressed, it's just about men and women having different advantages and disadvantages.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 02:03 PM
3

yeah good chance. "male empowerment" just screams "become a woke male"
/r/MensRights31/01/20 01:57 PM
4

debatable. prosthetic hands are MUCH better than prosthetic dicks right now.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 09:09 PM
-1

comments I never expected to read on reddit lol.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 09:09 PM
2

that's fair. the car does look like it was braking. it could have been going 20, or 30 mph.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 09:04 PM
5

hold her like what dude? he grabbed her, pulled her away, and then let go.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 09:03 PM
-1

I mean.....by the time he grabbed her.....the car was already passing her.....she woulda been fine. still, I get your point.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 09:02 PM
2

that sub is a dumpster fire. I don't understand it. It's full of the angriest bitterest women that are worse than the worst male incels.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 08:35 PM
0

I'd rather see a criminal walk free than an innocent person thrown in prison.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 04:41 PM
-1

I'm not assuming that. I know it's not automatic. BUT, it seems to happen frequently enough to be a concern, not to mention that even without jail, the false accusation always comes with destruction of reputation, job loss, etc.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:46 PM
0

you're confident that being raped is worse psychologically than being falsely declared a rapist, losing family and friends, losing careers, losing reputation, losing years of your life in prison (possibly being raped and otherwise abused), being a convicted criminal and sexual predator, and ruining your life? I can tell you right now, I'd rather get raped than be sent to prison for 5-10 years as a convicted sex predator.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:02 PM
3

people shouldn't be downvoting you. I get your intent there, the idea being you want other false-accusers to confess and get innocent people's records cleared. the problem is that if you don't punish false accusations, there's no reason for cruel or vindictive women to not do it. but maybe you have a kernel of truth there. maybe we don't punish the specific act of making a false accusation, but impose a punishment based on the time it took for you to fess up. So if you make a false accusation, a…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:00 PM
0

b-b-b-but women don't lie about rape?
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:51 PM
2

I'm sorry. just try and pull through it man. it'll end eventually. you seem to have a good grasp of your own mental condition and what issues this has caused you, so the priority is to just make sure you end up ok. You'll need to grieve the fact that this lost you months of your life. You can't get it back. and accept that there will be no recourse, no punishment for the hag that did this to you, and no compensation to you. I know you said you'd lose retirement benefits, but seriously consider l…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 03:39 PM
32

I mean, what rights do women not have?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 02:39 PM
1

it's not even a good design. a better design would be to make the seat part curved or sloped inwards. the little lip and the triangle shape would make you able to spread even further. or just put a foot on your knee.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 02:39 PM
-2

yeah if my wife accidentally shot me I wouldn't want her to go to prison.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 02:52 PM
2

Oh, so you're just batshit insane then. Gotcha. I'm not the one who thinks some millionaire octogenarian from Vermont cares about him more than any other scumbag politician ;) Go masturbate to your Libertarian fantasies elsewhere. that's rude. I mean, you asked, it's not like I started spewing ideology at you. But when you make a sarcastic comment implying I would be opposed to dissolving the federal government, or the federal military, and it sounds like you were betting on me being some Republ…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 08:18 PM
3

Sure, lets just dissolve the federal government then, since it's the largest socialist jobs program in America. agreed. let's get down to State level and go from there. The military too. yep. And kick veterans off of medical care they're only on medical care because they got sent 3000 miles away to blow up brown people. And end every single benefit program in the country. now you're getting somewhere. Oh and lets stop building/maintaining roads. that's silly. roads are useful. people have been m…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:24 PM
2

He has a 75% approval rating in Vermont, which was a real red state before he took over. Numbers say he is doing a great job. And shit, at least a political paper trail exists with him 1) a bunch of rich white champagne socialists like the king of rich white champagne socialists. shocker. 2) a "political paper trail" isn't exactly a desirable thing anymore. politicians suck. Edit: also I feel like you already know that this correction is coming, but he isn't a Marxist socialist. Hes seen the Nor…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 05:25 PM
3

Bernie is a loser champagne socialist of the worst variety. boy got kicked off a commune for being too lazy, that should tell you everything you need to know.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 05:14 PM
4

"toxic masculinity" is a moving target. a shell game. it doesn't have a fixed definition. It has as many different uses and definitions as feminists have hair colors and genders.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:07 PM
3

I know, it's just the excuse people use now.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:27 PM
1

yeah, and doing unnecessary wisdom tooth extraction when it isn't medically necessary is also wrong. what's your point? and yes, if they can do xrays and see that the wisdom teeth will cause a medical problem in a year from now, then sure, they can remove them. an intact foreskin =/= wisdom teeth obliterating someone's set of teeth.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:26 PM
4

There are many valid reasons to have operations on newborns. yeah nobody has a problem when they have to do some heart surgery on a newborn to fix a heart condition or whatever. nice try though. we aren't talking about medically necessary operations to fix problems. an intact foreskin is not a 'problem', it isn't a defect, it isn't something that needs to be fixed. but nice try at obfuscating the issue and comparing slicing off a perfectly healthy and intact foreskin with a doctor performing lif…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:23 PM
11

what's sad is that people need to be convinced to not mutilate their baby boys. how about you provide facts and reason for why it's ok to chop off part of the penis? male genital mutilation is just as deplorable as female genital mutilation. So unless you're ok with people chopping of their baby girls' labias and clits, I suggest you look at your own beliefs and try to reason it out.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:53 PM
2

yeah never got this. feminists seem hell-bent on pushing men to express emotions in a certain way, otherwise they're "repressing emotions" or "being oppressed by the patriarchy" or whatever. I don't cry. since I was a teenager, I can count the number of times I've cried on one hand. It's just not how I express sadness.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:48 PM
3

studies show that 100% of women have experienced sexism at least once, and 100% of men have committed sexist acts at least once
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:47 PM
14

how horrific. 4 kids. what a terrible woman. and it wasn't even like it was one drunken mistake or she made out with a dude while drunk in a club (which would be bad enough). she slept with the guy multiple times while away on a trip.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:45 PM
7

well that's the logic. I mean, dirt under fingernails is a prime cause of colds, coughs, flu, etc. when you touch your face or eat.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:40 PM
7

What’s next? No one should ever do any preventive medicine at all for any reason? preventative medicine cutting off a perfectly healthy functional foreskin from a healthy baby without any problems is not "preventative medicine". preventative medicine is like "take vitamins, get regular checkups, get regular bloodwork done, eat healthy, exercise". It doesn't include "chop of body parts so that they don't get dirty later" don't try and slippery-slope this from "chopping off body parts because they…
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:39 PM
5

That’s a ridiculous comparison and you know it. Nobody is talking about cutting off a dudes dick head. We are talking about a little bit of extra skin it's literally a piece of the penis. stop trying to minimize it as "oh just a little bit of skin. imagine cutting off a baby's nipples or ears because "it's just a bit of skin" Women get labiaplasty all the time, wouldn’t you say that’s pretty damn close to a circumcision for women? key being "women". not babies. do you support slicing off labias …
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:25 PM
9

do you know how gross and filthy you need to be to get smegma? you have to like, go without showering for probably a month. How disgusting are people who literally want to chop off a piece of their body because they let it get so dirty? imagine if someone grew a foot fungus, and their solution was to chop off their feet.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:51 PM
8

I’m just wondering, why do people care about women having genitals mutilated? I was mutilated when I was born and I’ve never really cared. Is there some kind of benefit to having your labia intact? Or is it just that some people want the choice? I don’t know
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:49 PM
5

how is it a crock of shit? would you agree that cutting off a woman's clit would make things less sensitive down there?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:48 PM
0

100% of patients who get breast cancer have breasts. weird right? maybe we should start chopping off breasts.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:46 PM
5

They all have perfectly fine working wieners. their foreskin doesn't work anymore. how can you say it's "perfectly fine working" when a piece was literally sliced off? if I sliced off the external part of your ear, and then said "oh well, your ear is working just fine", would that make sense? I mean, would your life be sooooo much better with just a bit more skin out there? Heck, cutting off your ear is better for cleanliness anyways!
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:44 PM
11

what's sad is that even within this sub, there's people supporting MGM
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:40 PM
1

yeah most people aren't getting gonorrhea from rubbing elbows with each other. I mean, chopping off babies feet would mean less athlete's foot and toe fungus in the future. Good idea right? I mean, cutting off feet has health benefits.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:40 PM
5

Another instance is removing extra parts like a minor having a third foot or 500 teeth. a foreskin isn't "extra parts". no more than the clitoris or labia are. stop comparing being born a 100% perfectly healthy functional boy to having some sort of genetic mutation like growing an extra foot.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:19 PM
14

correct. I don't believe ANY pieces of skin, fat, flesh, bone, etc. should be chopped off babies.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:49 PM
6

no no no I'm not talking about "the only available option to cure an infection or cancer". I'm talking about "well we don't want our kid to get athlete's foot in the future, so let's chop off their feet". removing the foreskin is not "the only available option to cure an infection or cancer". the baby doesn't have an infection or cancer.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:49 PM
9

cutting off the "entire" foreskin vs the "entire" breast. you could also trivialize breasts as "just a bit of skin and fat".
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:20 PM
14

it's perfectly reasonable to use FGM as a comparison to MGM. FGM is pretty much universally hated, including by people who are ok with MGM, so it's a pretty good point to make to those people.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:17 PM
9

chopping off penises would also mean less STD's. great idea.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:15 PM
8

it's the typical "we've always done it this way" or "well we (your parents) did X, so you need to follow".
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:13 PM
3

tonsils aren't "extra parts". they serve a purpose. just because sometimes they have to be removed for medical reasons doesn't mean electively amputating pieces of children is ok. are you ok with female genital mutilation? you know, slicing off the labia and clit?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:09 PM
4

....parents typically clean their young children, yes. and eventually they are old enough to clean themselves. what are you even saying?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:08 PM
2

removing wisdom teeth is a medical procedure done when the rear molars are causing dental problems. it's not medically necessary to chop off a foreskin.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:06 PM
3

should a parent be allowed to decide to have their child's legs cut off?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:05 PM
3

did you get your feet removed at birth to protect you from athlete's foot and toe fungus? just wash your dick dude.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:05 PM
2

Alright so back to my original question, how would you deal with people who couldn't pay restitutions? they can work. go pick up trash or wash dishes or something. And how would you deal with someone killing another while drunk driving? mostly the same as we do now? It would have to be stupid high, which most people can't pay it's possible that the price for taking a human life would be the death penalty. I'm not going to rule that out. Also, courts right now routinely compensate families a cert…
/r/MensRights04/12/19 12:53 PM
1

no because what I'm proposing would entirely eliminate prisons. either you get a bullet and a shallow grave (serial child rapists, mass murderers, etc) or you pay compensation to someone for damages. I'd also be eliminating all victimless crimes. Which sounds nice until you realize I'd eliminate all restrictions on firearms (owning an object doesn't have a victim), decriminalize drinking and driving (the act itself has no victim, and you're liable if you injure someone while being negligent), le…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 08:22 PM
6

So you'd kill a ton of homeless and poor people. nothing I said would indicate that. If I've got no money and steal your wallet, how would you deal with that? maybe mandatory work to repay the debt. I didn't say that death penalty was an alternative. I said that death penalty was only for certain crimes that reached that level.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:23 PM
3

here's a thought. 1) we eliminate all victimless crimes. yes, that means legalize all drugs, ownership of weapons, etc. 2) when someone commits a crime, they must pay compensation to the victim for damages. Basically, all crime becomes a tort law issue. 3) in cases where damages are deemed to be "un-repayable", or the perpetrator deemed too dangerous to allow back into society (serial rapists, serial killers, etc), they get the death penalty.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:58 PM
2

More than a third (37%) said they could not get contraception services locally that sounds like BS. if they live near a pharmacy, they can get it locally. that's absurd.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:05 PM
4

"it's ok because the only chick I saw naked was ugly"
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:03 PM
5

many americans are weird about it. like they insist on it being done, and it turns into a weird "well my father was and I am and I want my son to be the same", or then the women who are all "ew gross they're yucky when they're uncut".
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:02 PM
5

so turns out that management, business/financial ops, sales, and healthcare practitioners are all majority female. but feminists still complain about "not enough women in X fields"? they never complain about not enough women being in the maintenance business, or in construction.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 01:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter