~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3564 | Double standards on twitter finally getting recognised (original tweet had 31k likes) | Discrimination | HarrisonMccoid | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 12:29 PM |
| 651 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why? | HarrisonMccoid | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 11:52 AM | |
| 204 | Neymar being abused, turned into a cute relationship meme, his abuser also accused him of rape and assault but it was a false allegation | False Accusation | HarrisonMccoid | /r/MensRights | 17/08/19 09:05 AM |
| 165 | They don’t like it back | Humour | HarrisonMccoid | /r/MensRights | 19/08/19 09:11 PM |
| 26 | Megan rapinoe staying van djik should win a trophy due to being “cute” , imagine the backlash if the roles were reversed. “Don’t objectify women, so you’re just going to ignore all her accomplishments” etc etc | Social Issues | HarrisonMccoid | /r/MensRights | 23/09/19 08:41 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Megan rapinoe staying van djik should win a trophy due to being “cute” , imagine the backlash if the roles were reversed. “Don’t objectify women, so you’re just going to ignore all her accomplishments” etc etcFight fire with fire my friend | /r/MensRights | 24/09/19 09:58 PM |
| 3 | Megan rapinoe staying van djik should win a trophy due to being “cute” , imagine the backlash if the roles were reversed. “Don’t objectify women, so you’re just going to ignore all her accomplishments” etc etcIt’s football, the trophy for best male player, and she’s suggesting one of the players win based off being “cute” | /r/MensRights | 23/09/19 10:42 PM |
| 2 | Megan rapinoe staying van djik should win a trophy due to being “cute” , imagine the backlash if the roles were reversed. “Don’t objectify women, so you’re just going to ignore all her accomplishments” etc etcWhat do you mean? | /r/MensRights | 23/09/19 10:07 PM |
| 5 | Megan rapinoe staying van djik should win a trophy due to being “cute” , imagine the backlash if the roles were reversed. “Don’t objectify women, so you’re just going to ignore all her accomplishments” etc etcYeah and crying about equal pay etc. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/19 09:15 PM |
| 1 | Megan rapinoe staying van djik should win a trophy due to being “cute” , imagine the backlash if the roles were reversed. “Don’t objectify women, so you’re just going to ignore all her accomplishments” etc etcStating * | /r/MensRights | 23/09/19 08:42 PM |
| 1 | Double standards on twitter finally getting recognised (original tweet had 31k likes)Yes , I’ve had this discussion with several people now, it really is inference and how you perceive it to be wrong. Obviously we can all agree that this would be an issue if roles were reversed, but isn’t that the best way (well, in my opinion anyway) to fight hypocrisy of feminism, by pointing out instances of this | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 07:22 PM |
| 0 | Double standards on twitter finally getting recognised (original tweet had 31k likes)That’s fair enough, thanks for the comment , much love <3 | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 05:30 PM |
| 19 | Double standards on twitter finally getting recognised (original tweet had 31k likes)I rate this response highly and agree with it for the most part, I am on the same thought as you, however in this 21st century, as far as I see it, we have to be as petty as woman to allow them to understand where their argument falls through. Fight fire with fire I guess. For example this scenario, if we don’t say anything, or it goes unnoticed, then women get the furthered free reign and hypocrisy they want | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 04:11 PM |
| 6 | Double standards on twitter finally getting recognised (original tweet had 31k likes)Yeah but it’s more the principal of it is it not? | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 04:05 PM |
| 16 | Double standards on twitter finally getting recognised (original tweet had 31k likes)Yeah I suppose I agree, but it is the issue regarding is a man recorded a woman getting changed, for his own personal use, like she has there. He would be questioned and made to delete it | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 03:55 PM |
| 88 | Double standards on twitter finally getting recognised (original tweet had 31k likes)Which they would, which is the point | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 03:53 PM |
| 15 | Double standards on twitter finally getting recognised (original tweet had 31k likes)Just means , would you react in the same jokey way | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 03:28 PM |
| 1 | Double standards on twitter finally getting recognised (original tweet had 31k likes)F | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 01:07 PM |
| 1 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?Ok I understand, an I apologise, it was never my intention | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 03:46 PM |
| 1 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?With you on that one chief | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 02:44 PM |
| 2 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?Thank you for letting me know, seems the article is quite poorly constructed then, | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 02:40 PM |
| 3 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?exactly my plan | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 02:38 PM |
| 2 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?Oh, so misinformation on the daily mails part then? They portrayed it as if she was directly involved | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 02:37 PM |
| -3 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?I’m debating just keeping it up because you’re crying so much about it? I only put it on with the intention of understanding why there was no picture for the woman, but multiple people have added talking points in the comments and I’ve replied and been interested in other stories similar to this one , or explanations as to why this has happened. I’ll delete the cunt if you’re that bothered | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 02:34 PM |
| -10 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?Translation I couldn’t give a fuck about karma ? It’s already at 600 anyways I think most people have seen it by now, you really think I’m sitting here manspreading so my balls can droop to my ankles while I refresh this shit to see how many little orange arrows I got? | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 02:30 PM |
| 3 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?I don’t think there was a victim, they appear to have been having an old orgy | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 02:19 PM |
| -11 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?Why would I do that? Some of the comments have made me laugh, Joyce being granny banged at 85 is pretty humorous , plus this is the top comment so anyone with a mild interest will be able to see the issue is resolved | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 02:11 PM |
| 3 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?I understand it most likely isn’t, but it’s still a talking point. And I doubt they failed to find a picture, as 3 of the 4 males look to be pictured within custody | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 01:42 PM |
| 2 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?Oh no probs , I might not have been clear enough , thanks for the input tho | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 01:04 PM |
| 2 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?Fair enough, like I said I was just wondering | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 12:59 PM |
| 6 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?I haven’t seen many articles like this on snapchat, but it just caught my eye, I’m sure it is an anomalous article | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 12:54 PM |
| 40 | Daily mail exposing 4 men for “lewd sexual activity” in a forest but didn’t show the females face in The article at all, why?Ok thank you , was just curious as to wether there was some form of bias going on as per usual | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 12:01 PM |
| 1 | They don’t like it backI think people are taking this joke slightly too seriously, it was just taking the piss at the end of the day, and I do see a difference asking about height and weight, but again, you can’t ask about a feature of someone, and then get asked a feature about yourself then get offended , it is a double standard | /r/MensRights | 20/08/19 09:07 AM |
| 20 | They don’t like it backI just think that, the point that was being made by the joke post, was that why should women be allowed to scrutinise and dictate/decide what features the man should have , but when a man does the same back, about her physical appearance, same as she did, they find it offensive. Women and feminists like to judge men on their appearance only, but don’t like it when we do it back (idk if that’s right , but it’s what I take from it) keep in mind it is only a joke post | /r/MensRights | 19/08/19 09:33 PM |
| 29 | They don’t like it backIt wasn’t me, it was someone else, I just found it funny , sorry should’ve put that in the title | /r/MensRights | 19/08/19 09:20 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter