TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HarryLillis Archive

View 0 posts and 98 comments by HarryLillis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Nah, when they call you husband material that's when you dick them like your wife. You have to be chill, though, and if you're an American white fellow you are most likely not, since our culture is inferior to most other cultures. Experience some cultural exchange, even if you can't travel, get a beginner's mind mentality and talk to foreigners online.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:48 PM
–

Not being an asshole takes a lot of work and isn't something you can take for granted. Instinctive empathy is powerful but it's not nearly all of the information and work a person needs to be truly empathetic for the purposes of an organized society. The Red Pill is just a list of mental stop signs to prevent further work on not being an asshole, so, if you're wondering why women are picking assholes over you, it's because you're both assholes and the other person has at least one other quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 05:32 PM
-2

I mean if the debate were just if men or women have it harder then it'd be over in a second, it's unambiguously women. Also I would never acknowledge that nonsensical statement about attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 05:26 PM
1

That's not very much information, the equivalent of what I meant by nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 05:24 PM
1

Ah, if you're a bit older then you're coming from an episteme in which that was more normal. The culture has substantially changed to the point that our expectations are more similar to foreign norms. I mean, certainly people still do this but given the violence of patriarchy, most women hate being approached. I've had a lot of success with meeting women in the ordinary way. You do know nothing about them, and no one is attractive if you know nothing about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 01:17 PM
-1

You know people in other countries often complain about US tourists striking up conversations with them, a stranger. In other cultures people generally initiate conversations on the basis of shared experiences. How tf would a stranger appeal to you? You know nothing about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 10:07 PM
-2

Your perspective isn't aesthetic enough to justify misanthropy. Look to the heavens, guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 10:03 PM
6

That's the exact opposite of the truth. Dating for straight women is a nightmarish endeavor specifically because men hold themselves so cheaply that women can't so much as make a dating profile without getting an unmanageably huge number of messages in their inbox. Not one of those men is going to succeed, and if anyone does it's going to be the one who messaged that profile out of genuine interest and took the time to write a good message so that it actually stands out. Even then, some guys hol…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 06:21 PM
-2

You should never approach someone you don't know; why would you talk to a stranger? One inevitably meets people through the usual channels.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 06:14 PM
1

Given the current state of income inequality in the west, it's objectively the case that the statistical majority of women by far are not wealthy enough to even have the epistemics to develop an expectation of opulence. So, I don't know if you're all a small statistical portion of the upper middle class with no sense of scale or political awareness, but literally everyone who ever spoke to you as if these fantasies about the character of women were not utterly fucking ridiculous was doing you a …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 11:28 PM
1

You believe the character of women has fundamentally changed in a century? By what mechanism?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 07:18 PM
1

I don't know why all you dorks continue to refuse to form a theory of mind for the way women experience attraction. You're all operating on the assumption that women's experience of attraction is comparable to yours, which is only true during ovulation and only for some women. Also, while your conditioning causes you to commodify and quantify the physical attractiveness of women for particular traits that happen to be in right now, this is not only not inherent, but it's also fairly recent. If y…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 05:22 PM
1

You're referring to entirely distinct cohorts of opinioned peoples and drawing conclusions from the contradictions of people who would openly contradict each other. So you've described nothing that isn't the argument they're having.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 05:03 PM
-1

If I had a son I would have to worry less about their physical safety, where as if I had a girl I would have to worry less about preserving the gentleness of their soul.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/20 06:31 PM
1

What gets the best out of a person is charity, kindness, and nurturing in all matters always, regardless of what sort of relationship you have with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/20 03:15 PM
4

Probably just male conditioning making them associate the condition with a lack of virile worth. One review of the Enchiridion of Epictetus would cure that right up.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 04:02 PM
3

I am a man and most of my friends are women. The typical rearing model for men creates degenerate, cowardly, incompetent, and abusive people, so unless that man has substantially broken from the societal norm or never started there, their company is completely intolerable. The conditioning of women is terrific; the only problem with it is that the other half of the conditioning is male conditioning. If everyone were conditioned like women then society would be far better off.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 07:47 PM
2

It is impossible to be a red piller without suffering from deep frustrations with women, whether you're in a relationship or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 06:46 PM
2

Ah. You are responsible for your own frustrations with women, then. Reform this disgusting view.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/20 01:08 PM
3

Working under Capitalism is also exploitation of the body, no question. When you look laterally for your frustrations rather than at the rich, you're thanking the boot on your neck.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 08:42 PM
2

I can't stand the company of most other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 08:38 PM
1

I don't know what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 12:06 AM
1

Prime for women is 40s. Of course it's a qualitative evaluation so it's not extremely straightforward but when you evaluate for sexual satisfaction instead of less relevant factors like high libido then the sexual peaks of men and women are both mid-life.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/20 02:28 PM
1

Male prime starts at 30. Are red pillers so counter-factual you can't even get the basics of reality straight?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/20 02:11 PM
1

Oh yeah, no one's ever in the clergy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/20 02:09 PM
1

I don't know how beastializing figures into this.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 01:53 PM
11

I like them both at the same time, with all parties' consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 07:05 PM
1

What are you even on?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/20 03:47 PM
7

Yes, she gave out the method by implication in her comment. Do not use harassment or approach on the basis of appearance alone. Approach someone because of common interests and logical reasons to think cohabitation might be a good idea. Ideally you should know them a little bit first.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/20 03:04 PM
1

I was just stating a person's objective moral obligations, not referring to any particular philosopher, but if any particular philosopher appears more in my previous comment than another it's Epictetus, not Aristotle. There's unrelated principles, as well, that merely emerge from contemporary society. I'm not sure why recognizing the existence and obligations of morality always compels some user or another to accuse the person talking about it of receiving an education; somehow the criticism see…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/20 03:45 PM
1

Yes and no, if that statement were an accurate description of the causal chain leading to the obesity epidemic then yes, everyone has an obligation to do the best they may. No, in that the obesity epidemic is caused by harmful epidemiological policy rather than the actions of individuals, who can only take personal action to change their results in a relatively small percentage of cases. But yes, the reduction of harm everywhere is the aim of morality, harm to the self is as harmful to society a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/20 12:30 AM
1

Yourself, and so consequently society. Though, this is an all other factors being equal statement so it wouldn't apply if you like one of them more.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/20 12:08 AM
1

Women are murdered by men at an alarming rate; they're mostly looking for someone who will not murder them. If you see yourself getting looked over for men who lack some kind of aesthetic nicety from your perspective, he probably has less built up resentment of the sort that sometimes erupts in murder than you do. Not that you'd murder someone, but you may seem like you might.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 10:37 PM
2

I've never been hurt in any meaningful sense and yet I sustain a belief in objective morality and its universal applicability to all situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 10:28 PM
1

The hypothesis space is infinite, actually. A person is obliged at all times to cultivate their virtue. The people you spend the most time around influence you; you become more similar to them. Your shared experiences make you more the same person than before. When you co-habitate with an unvirtuous person you are indulging the more harmful and degenerate aspects of your mind, which only worsen with practice and repetition. You have probably seen an elder person with a remarkable set of virtuous…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 10:27 PM
1

You had to change a word because you did not find the meaning you wished to respond to. As I did not say or mean that, your response has no relevance to my comment. Your misogynistic fantasies taped onto the end there are just vulgar.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:41 PM
0

Everyone has a moral responsibility at all times to consider the moral, aesthetic, and political ramifications of all of their actions and choices, and there is no single decision in life which does not have a heavy component of all three of those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:39 PM
1

It is factual, but you would have to believe in objective morality. I said I was blue pill, certainly a kind person is not owed a romantic partner and a kind person can happily go on as a hermit, but if you're picking between two people for a romantic partner and all other factors are equal, there is a moral responsibility to pick the kinder of the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:38 PM
8

I mean, 100% blue pill, but, any gender dating people of any gender, there is a moral responsibility to date kind people and not date unkind people. Dating unkind people is a moral endorsement of their treatment of others. There is a societal responsibility inherent in everyone to advance the moral treatment of others to the fullest possible extent. It's just that the "women date assholes, why won't they date a nice, codependent guy like me who dumps all of their emotional labor on them all the …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 08:25 PM
3

Yes, I'm blind in Bermuda, Guam, Montenegro, and Chile.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 01:35 AM
2

Ha! Nothing red pillers claim is even remotely borne out by reality; nothing even nearly resembling any of their claims has ever occurred. You must have created this account for the express purpose of fabricating this claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 11:33 PM
4

Years wasted by experiencing your preconceptions instead of what was in front of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 08:22 PM
2

That's all it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 04:54 PM
3

Yes, it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/20 04:54 PM
4

I have never "practiced" and no one has ever thought of me as creepy. The creepy label comes in when malintent or resentment is palpable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/20 10:00 PM
13

Have you contemplated the possibility that men's refusal to eschew artificial standards of sexual performance that pertain only to male virility and not emotional engagement or anything satisfying to women, along with the expectation that women consent to sex in far more situations than are comfortable for them, would produce the result of making sex occasionally seem like a chore?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/20 07:15 PM
0

A regular habit of looking critically at one's own misogyny will make one popular with women. You don't even have to talk about it; your body language will make it obvious that you're not dangerous. Until you have this habit, you literally are dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/20 06:37 PM
11

Are you honestly suggesting that 80% of men don't fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/20 06:32 PM
1

It's not useful in America either, since it's pure nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 05:53 PM
1

I'm not. As the life span increases so too does the maturation period. 18 year olds are no longer adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 09:42 PM
1

They are utterly a child and you are sick if you are a full grown adult and fuck one.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 02:55 PM
1

As a 28 year old, I would not fuck a child, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/19 04:31 AM
1

Keep weeping in obscure corners where no one can see your humanity so that you can write "lol" in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:21 PM
1

Well your assumption is random and not the case. What you're talking about has nothing to do with what that person said. Obviously human beings have an instinctual and irrational side. This is nothing like saying that aspect of a person is monstrous. I accept every element of my nature without judgment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 05:42 PM
1

What makes the animal a monster? You should be fine with your instinctual side.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 05:41 PM
3

I make no claims to moral superiority, but the claim that an individual bears moral responsibility for participating in an infrastructure they have no means to change is absurd. That's the Vegan view, "Oh, I'm an ethical consumer at least so I'm doing alright." There's no such thing as ethical consumerism. It's not possible in the current order of the world. Human cruelty exists but is also the product of societal forces for which the individual cannot be made to account. We do our best. Most pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 06:14 AM
6

On what basis do you assume that mental illness is more common in the developed world except perhaps detection rates? I'd assume it's probably much higher in the undeveloped world, since there is suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:55 AM
5

If you suffer from high testosterone, sure. People with normal amounts are fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:24 AM
0

And you have a great deal of experience in killing people joyfully? I don't think anyone's confused on that point, though, there's this pervasive notion that war is the zenith of the male experience. I don't think it's true since nothing fucks men up more, but hey. If you believe your cause is righteous and you're getting good at a skill then yeah, obviously someone would enjoy killing from time to time. How does that make them a monster? And if you mean some undercurrent that's unrelated to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:23 AM
0

There's no question that all animals have powerful instinctual behaviors. I fail to see how that has anything to do with the statement I quoted, or PCP.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:06 AM
3

Oh, no. But I suffer from nothing symptomatic of either high or low testosterone levels. Why do you ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:00 AM
1

I don't know what you're asking. What are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:49 PM
5

Every man also has a monster inside of them that could come out Do you actually believe this? Have you ever felt this in yourself in some way? I've been a man for some decades now and have no reason to think this about myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:52 PM
1

I'm not particularly interested in talking about how "grounded" I am, as I simply know with absolute certainty that I am. I know the importance of the dialectical process more than most people on Earth, I live and breath in it. However, there are those who say the Earth is flat. I will not entertain their ideas. It is exactly the same level of lunacy to deny Feminism. You can debate within Feminism, the differences of opinion are great and the methods of application are varied. If you don't feel…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 07:21 PM
0

Believe me, if you had a sense of irony, this conversation would not be occurring.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 01:30 AM
1

In the case of Feminism, moderating with opposing perspectives is moderating with bigotry. I am grounded in every subject in the manner you describe, but you are simply behind in your knowledge of the subject if you believe there is any benefit to the voices opposing Feminism. I'm a man myself and so men's issues are important to me. The answer to them, however, are all found in Feminism. They were also all brought up by Feminism. Every expectation and disadvantage felt by men is a product of Pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 01:29 AM
1

I don't mind being a bigot if the word is applied to say I am too certain that two twos are four. I do mind if it is applied to say that I deny the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:17 AM
2

Go ask a biologist, "Would you say the endocrinological distinction between men and women is sufficient to argue that contemporary gender roles are biologically derived?" I hope you will not be surprised by the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:16 AM
4

I didn't mention archaeology. Biologists will not agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 11:22 PM
0

I wonder at nothing where this subject is concerned. I simply have to wait for the passage of time for bigotry to die.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 11:15 PM
1

Well, from the Feminist perspective there's nothing valid about opposing perspectives, which is true, every opposing perspective to Feminism is garbage. It can get tiring to explain oneself over and over again. Basically your analysis isn't consistent with any genuine application of evolutionary theory. In that field they're not actually certain if gender roles were at all established by the process of nature or if this was a strictly sociological construction. There is not, as of now, good reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 10:21 PM
9

If you tell your wife how little you get out of your relationship, she'll simply dwell on the subject and agree with you. This "withholding affection" nonsense accomplishes nothing but withholding affection. She'll then simply think back on all of the time you haven't been affectionate and think, "Oh, I'm not in a relationship with a man who loves me." Love is not an abstract state, it's the sum of a series of mutual behaviors. If you bring it up, I don't think you'll be able to prevent her from…
/r/askMRP17/11/15 06:10 PM
1

What if the woman hated the guy's family because the guy's family really sucks? Most families suck in my experience. I mean, naturally it would depend on the tone that had become acceptable between the two regarding the shitty family. With my girlfriend and I it's generally fine that I admit I think her family has an immoral morality. So if they're already comfortable admitting that the family sucks, why would that be a disrespectful reason? Naturally you keep that reason between yourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 05:27 PM
1

Well /r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for abusers, so /r/RedPillWomen is a subreddit for abuse enablers. It's very plain by reading the subreddit, which is a sad place.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 05:21 PM
12

You just look acrost the river, now.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 05:40 PM
2

I don't think you're right about the first part, you can't have a happy relationship and ignore your problems. If I ever want to discuss a problem I have no issue doing that with my girlfriend. We can always talk. If you can't talk with your partner then you simply need to leave them and find a partner who will talk with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 03:45 PM
1

I've had sex with a lot of women and a few men. I wouldn't quite know how to say "success rate" because it's not something I actively attempt or approach. I have an open relationship and I socialize frequently and people seem to like my appearance, voice and conversation. Generally there's frequently someone present who has given some kind of social indication that their interest is perhaps more than friendly, and so you just talk. Perhaps this is an advantage of living in a city.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 03:41 PM
2

I can't say my partner and I have ever wronged each other, that seems a lot more severe than anything that has ever happened between us. I also don't necessarily feel she needs to make it up to me if she hurts my feelings or something, partly because she instantly feels absurdly remorseful, and partly because I'm a grown person and don't require some kind of recompense for every way I've ever felt hurt. It sounds like you're immature and attract immature women. Next question.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 03:20 PM
3

I don't enjoy him at all. Quite partial to Bing Crosby. I also enjoy Peggy Seeger, Ewan McColl, John Jacob Niles, Stephen Foster, Tchaikovsky, Beethoven, Mozart, Stravinsky, Shostakovich, Anais Mitchell, Leo Kottke, Hank Williams Sr. and Little Jimmie Dickens. Time has very little to do with music.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 08:57 PM
7

I'm not sure why that would be offensive. I'm 25.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 08:41 PM
7

If you have a constant desire to have sex, you have sex addiction, not maleness. I'm a man and am not cognizant of these problems. What are you talking about with the second one? Who thinks of you as inherently evil or malicious? My experience has almost exclusively been the opposite, that as a man my intentions are well thought of even when they are poor, or that when I perceive poor intentions in other men, other people don't perceive them. The third one, sure, but does this affect you on a da…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 08:24 PM
1

What makes you say that? Most songs are about fucking. I perceive no difference at all between those things, the job of an artist is often to take the private into the public context.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 07:48 PM
1

The way to put on an engaging performance is to find true emotional expression.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 07:38 PM
2

Nice, people rarely get the reference. I modeled my singing voice after Bing Crosby. My statement was already evidenced by the comment itself, unless you want to dispute the fact that human beings will experience emotional vulnerability in periods of their life. It follows plainly that you can't effectively plan your mentality around preventing the inevitable. Also your statement is strange to me simply because I'm an emotionally vulnerable man but I also have no particular struggle in attractin…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 07:26 PM
3

Do you have some kind of proof of this? It's not at all consistent with my own experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 07:12 PM
0

I'm confused as to what you think "blue pilled" means. Do you mean subscribers to /r/TheBluePill? I am on the "Blue Pill" side but I am also an attractive man with a wide variety of sexual experiences just like you describe. So, am I a wrench in your question or am I not understanding what you're asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 06:37 PM
3

Lack of emotional vulnerability is a weakness. The reason for this is that you will at times be emotionally vulnerable, because you are a human being, but if you have structured your identity around this being unacceptable, then you'll have no outlet or support for it. You'll have surrounded yourself with people who agree with you and then you really can't express yourself. I mean, it's just poor planning. Eventually all of that self-suppression will lead to a collected store of emotional baggag…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 05:31 PM
-3

RedPillWomen is a subreddit for abuse enablers, so this doesn't surprise me. It surprises me a bit that a subreddit for abusers and a subreddit for abuse enablers don't get along well, though. I guess everything would be expected to have that kind of tone in this world, however. Now, you obviously got everything she was saying incorrectly, but I think it is basically sick for a man to be attracted to a fifteen year old regardless of her having secondary sexual features. I agree with her that it …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 05:16 PM
2

I don't think you can objectively measure attractiveness such as on a normal distribution, which would be necessary to test this idea. I also don't think it would play out this way even if you could, since there are people who are considered by many to be outwardly attractive but who can't pair off effectively because they're unkind, or stupid. Yet there's also the problem with separating them, as people who are stupid, unkind, lacking in confidence, or incompetent also seem less physically attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 05:02 PM
0

Hate speech has a specific definition, it occurs against protected groups and often incites violence. As women are constantly victims of violence, the misogynistic paradigm is perpetuating a war against women. Hate is not sufficient and subscribers to /r/theredpill are not a protected class. I do hate all of you. I hate my enemies. It gets me going in the morning. I hate people who participate in hate speech. There's simply no contradiction there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 07:33 PM
1

That's fine as long as they keep it in private. I've masturbated to Egyptian wall paintings (not regularly, just this one that evoked a certain image,) but no one will call me a pervert if I buy a book of them unless I masturbate in line at Barnes & Noble.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 10:04 PM
1

You assume all photographs are sexual?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 03:43 PM
-7

I didn't say they do, I was just defining it in a reasonable fashion. I can say the claims that there would be an outcry if the reverse of this situation occurred are just random. Everyone likes to encourage reading. And yes, that person sounds awful and strange.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:27 PM
-8

I can't be wrong about it being fine, a person not liking their photograph taken is just an individual with a hang up.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:15 PM
-16

Someone who is making the subject aware of their presence in an overtly sexual way, such as by taking upskirt photographs or things of that nature, is obviously being a creep, and anything short of that is not.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:48 PM
-19

Feminist here. No, it's fine to take pictures in a place of public accommodation so long as you're not being a creep.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:31 PM
1

The Patriarchy is not a notion that permeates society, it is society such as it is presently constituted. It is not a gender equivalent ideology to Feminism. Feminism is the pursuit of equality in a Patriarchal society. To deny the utility of Feminism is to deny the existence of the Patriarchy. Furthermore the influences of Feminism could only further equality, as the Patriarchy disadvantages both genders. You're only working against us in here.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:20 PM
1

It's the same rape culture, not a bit different than the one we feminists are talking about. Patriarchal civilization disadvantages everyone.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter