TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HarryPeckerCrabbe Archive

View 0 posts and 132 comments by HarryPeckerCrabbe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

There will not be mandatory paternity testing to fight this fraud until men start demanding this occur. In fact, whenever I have posted about this on AskMen in the past, there have been a significant number of men who say it would destroy trust in their relationship. In reality, men who do not want a paternity test could opt out by signing a form (in private) that has a list of risks associated with a test waiver detailed on it. This is a question of fraud, and practically everywhere you look in…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:04 AM
1

When are people going to wake up to the fact that progressives are the most hypocritical group of individuals out there? Want another example? Check into Margaret Sanger's (founder of Planned Parenthood) background and her beliefs on eugenics. Read her autobiography about her presentation she made to the Women's KKK chapter in Silverlake, New York. She was quite popular with the KKK afterwards. But you would never know that by listening to Obama, Clinton, and Planned Parenthood advocates.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:58 AM
16

Man cheats? It's the man's fault. Woman cheats? It's the man's fault. Female logic.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:59 AM
11

I'm a successful, educated man who has been married ten years in a stable relationship. I can state unequivocally that, if I was to make the decision again, I would not have gotten married. The very marginal benefits of marriage are markedly outweighed by the risks, sacrifices and the opportunity costs. Just isn't worth it, quite simply.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 03:40 AM
12

I was a biochemistry major at an Upper Ivy League school, and my department bent over backwards to attract undergraduate female candidates. While roughly thirty of us graduated in the major, not one was a woman. However, women took some of the easier science classes, such as intro to biology, and they were welcomed as colleagues. It is hard work and takes sacrifice to run the gauntlet on some of these tough majors (chemistry, physics) that, for whatever reason, few women seem to want to pursue. …
/r/MensRights20/07/15 12:05 PM
51

The unfortunate reality is that it rarely is clear that someone is "crazy" upfront. Men often only find out years into the marriage. This warped thinking is the result of women being repeatedly told that they are victims in society.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:13 PM
1

You need to distinguish between an advocate for a strong central government in the late 1700's v. a "progressive" post WWII (proxy vocabulary for Socialist / Communist). The latter goes to the current Administration's intrusion into what historically was considered private affairs (and responsibilities). Read some of Hamilton's writings on those topics as well as views on fiscal responsibility and the free market.
/r/MGTOW19/06/15 07:32 AM
2

The real question is why Hamilton, if you are going to do it all? Why not Andrew Jackson on the $20? In my view, Hamilton was a known free market advocate and Federalist. His politics don't align with the current 'progressive' administration. This further strikes Hamilton out of the national awareness. Additionally, the $10 bill is more widely circulated than the $20 bill. By putting a woman on it, it pushes a particular progressive social agenda. I wouldn't do it period, but if it going to be d…
/r/MGTOW18/06/15 10:06 AM
2

Well then, stop me. Or, are you just insensitive to people who exercise their rights to express their viewpoints. Perhaps you are a little bit on the tender side. By the way, Feminists across the spectrum use the term "Womyn's Rights."
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:53 AM
4

This will continue until men, in much larger numbers, stand up and start screaming (and form themselves into a powerful voting lobby so politicians finally need to listen, chucking aside much of the a Womyn's Rights nonsense).
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:43 PM
2

Feminism is a political action movement to advocate benefits for, and one-sided adjustments in the traditional social contract in favor of, its constituents, to the detriment of others in society. Often, this cause is advanced by employing 'statistics' that are knowingly false or present a misleading view of reality, all the while employing ad hominem attacks against those who object. All's fair when you are a victim. Of course they are not going to call for quotas in the ditch digging business …
/r/MensRights15/06/15 02:49 PM
3

School of hard knocks . . . I have a few old buddies from high school and college I would trust before anyone.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:35 PM
4

I have known people like her, and you're probably spot on. Bringing her onboard to begin with was a mistake. In both business and in your personal life, you got to stay way clear of people like her.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:17 AM
9

I am a successful entrepreneur who built, then sold, a company in U.S. When I sold my company four years ago, I did so for more than Reddit's most recent valuation. In other words, I have experience in running companies this size. My recommendation to the equity owners of Reddit (Advance Publications is the majority owner): Time for a management change - and do so quickly.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:30 AM
9

All four women interviewed have the same level of maturity as my four year old daughter.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:37 PM
8

Just the other day I had a several of my posts deleted that (in my view) effectively destroyed the tripe (and ad hominem attacks) being spouted by a Feminist / Progressive / Womyn's Rights advocate on the topic of gender relations. My posts were logical and factual, in contrast to the person who was accusing me of being sexist (don't agree with the progressive narrative? -- you're sexist!). At the very least the moderators were complicit, although I suspect more was at play. Done!
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:39 AM
18

The best line in that whole thread is: Feminists: "we need men like a fish needs a bicycle!" Men: "we need women like a bicycle needs a fish."
/r/MGTOW08/06/15 03:05 AM
3

Women have managed to have themselves officially labelled as "victims" in modern developed societies, so you get nonsense like this. Facts don't matter, just the progressive narrative. The lack of critical thought is amazing. Feminism is a political action movement that seeks to do what all political movements do: utilize the force of the State to bestow benefit on their special interest group at the expense of other segments of society. This is accomplished in part in how you define things (wom…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 10:43 PM
11

More like 80 - 90% in reality . . . . The definition of "relationship" for most is a fairly pliable thing.
/r/MGTOW22/05/15 09:07 AM
10

Women have been officially labelled "victims" in our society. This is a natural result of that process. Look also at the limited level of scrutiny rape claims, such as the ones that happened at UVa and Duke, sometimes initially receive. Despite being major felony charges, with individual liberty at risk, a healthy level of scrutiny is often suspended. I have traveled and lived globally. I am in position to compare how women are treated in various cultures. To paraphrase one commentator I heard, …
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:09 PM
12

As someone who now lives overseas, and who has traveled extensively during his adult life, this article is spot on. While it is difficult to see while living in the U.S., the comments are pretty damn accurate. I actually don't recognize American culture at this point relative to what I grew up with several decades ago. Thanks for posting.
/r/MGTOW26/04/15 09:27 AM
22

Frankly, this is what happens when a group of people start believing their own bullshit -- that is that they are victims due to some amorphous, hard to objectively verify discriminatory force in society. We all have obstacles that we need to overcome in life, people just need to get on with it without always looking to blame others for their failures (like this womyn here) or just plain old bad fortune/circumstances. If this nonsense is ever going to stop, a broader cross-section of men in socie…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:05 PM
0

I won't disagree with you!
/r/MensRights12/04/15 09:58 AM
6

Of course: (i) they have convinced themselves that they are victims, and are righteous about it - society owes them compensation; (ii) feminism is a political action movement, whether it acknowledges it or not, whose goal is the same as other movement - lobby the government to use its force to give them special treatment and benefits, in exchange for votes (Yeah, Hiliary! She has done so much for Womyn's Rights!).
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:30 AM
15

The women's vote is fairly powerful, and politicians are kowtowing to it. It all gets framed as a "womyn's rights" issue to protect these poor "victims". In the meantime, fairness and common sense go right out the window.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 01:57 AM
2

I have a pre-nup, and this is exactly how we approached it. My wife is trained as a lawyer and had separate legal counsel. My lawyer told me that in just about all instances he can recall, having a pre-nup was markedly better than none. Note also that a pre-nup will help prevent bad behavior on the part of the wife during the marriage. My pre-nup has a fairly stringent infidelity clause, and while my wife is not the type to mess around, she damn well knows that if she does step out, she will be …
/r/MensRights12/04/15 01:50 AM
2

In the corporate world there routinely are all-female support groups and events, including offsites, but no one bats an eye about it because women successfully have defined themselves as victims. The large companies and private equity firms I know bend over backwards to promote women who even begin to try to tough it out. The jobs aren't easy for anyone. Often, the charge of "gender discrimination" is just a clever means, in the real world, for some women to get ahead relative to a lot of very h…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:34 AM
11

As a successful entrepreneur who is now in his late 40's, and who has seen a thing or two, your comment is spot on. Feminism in the working world is more about gaining a commercial advantage and special treatment vis-a-vis very qualified men who work their asses off.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:27 AM
2

Of course they didn't - that's not the point. The MO employed by these professionals is to create a big media fiasco, promoting the notion that women (or whomever) have been obviously further "victimized" and need additional special rights and protections, thereby harnessing even more government force in their favor. Facts be damned. The finding of a lack of evidence, and the rights of the accused (guilty before being proven innocent, mind you), is an afterthought that is barely noticed. They ar…
/r/MGTOW24/03/15 09:49 AM
4

Women have successfully portrayed themselves in popular culture as victims. This view allows them to get away with this bullshit. Men need to start calling out this nonsense forcefully..
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:39 AM
5

Womyn's groups have successfully portrayed themselves as victims and in need of special benefits and advantages from politicians, who are eager to gather votes. Nothing will change soon unfortunately.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:24 PM
2

Good living, friend. Congratulations. Some of the photos remind me of the South Island in New Zealand.
/r/MGTOW05/03/15 06:40 AM
13

This is why you should not get married if you are a successful entrepreneur or professional. A whole lot of nonsense, for very little in return.
/r/MGTOW02/03/15 03:22 PM
2

Why is anyone surprised? This is what happens when any group successfully has the "victim" label attached to them -- and the facts be damned.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:55 AM
2

Didn't you see the red flags going into the marriage? I am in my late 40s and have been married for ten years. I waited until I found someone who presented the right risk profile, in addition to personality and attractiveness, before deciding to move forward (and even then with a pre-nup). Absent feeling comfortable around a whole host of issues, I would have remained single. Feminist mother-in-law is almost as bad as having a feminist wife - my heart goes out to you. Good luck!
/r/MGTOW29/12/14 09:48 AM
6

Man in his 40s here, married for ten years (to a traditionally minded Chinese woman who was educated in the U.K.). I am a graduate of a liberal East Coast school (Ivy League) where I played football (which made me and my teammates the odd guys out on campus). Two points: (i) this victimization mentality run amok is not a new one - it clearly existed back in the late 1980s / early 1990s and was gaining momentum, and (ii) the clear cut results of a simple cost/benefit analysis led most of us more …
/r/MensRights11/12/14 11:42 PM
1

There is published, peer reviewed research that found false rape claims were 41% of all such claims in one mid-sized metropolitan area. There is other evidence also indicating that 2% figure, which is borrowed from overall felony charges, is not in fact accurate. False rape claims very likely occurs much, much more frequently. The Feminists don't want you to know that.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 02:15 AM
3

You need to sharpen up on your knowledge of due process. Recall also that the University of Virginia is a state sponsored and funded school.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 02:12 AM
6

You need to take a criminal law class so you understand the concept of due process. Protections are in place for a reason.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 02:09 AM
5

There are a couple moderators in particular on AskMen and OneY who believe they own the place and are therefore at liberty to engage in censorship (rather than encouraging more speech to counter opinions they disagree with). That being said, those spaces are infinitely better than the women's (sorry, womyn's) focused threads. I have never seen some much group think in my 40 years+ of life on this good earth than exists on AskWomen and TwoX. And if you don't follow the narrative over there, despi…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:22 AM
2

There is also a strong correlation between the number of sexual partners a woman has had before marriage and the chances of divorce in her first marriage. The published, peer reviewed study was conducted at Indiana. I haven't seen comparable statistically significant findings for men.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:15 AM
1

Genuine high end hookers.
/r/MGTOW21/11/14 09:30 AM
1

Many are not well off when they first get married. You also have society, culture, family (particularly female members) and the sense of being the odd guy out when everyone else has done so. Key points: if a professional man or entrepreneur feels compelled to get married because he wants children, he better hire a very good lawyer and enter into an extensively negotiated pre-nup in which the wife-to-be has her own legal counsel.
/r/MGTOW21/11/14 09:27 AM
1

Discussing this on a men's forum is one thing; taking the argument to neutral, or even women's (sorry, womyn's) forums, is another. I have gone head to head with some of the moderators on AskWomen, and quite remarkably haven't been banished yet. They may try to quash free speech and open debate, but thoughtful citizens of both genders shouldn't let them.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:58 PM
6

Of course there are double standards. Today's Feminist movement is nothing more than a political action campaign to accrue benefits, and avoid responsibilities, for a particular segment in society (women . . . . sorry, womyn), just like every other special interest. Another example: womyn complain about their objectification in the media but it is women who overwhelmingly buy fashion magazines and who sits on their editorial board. But somehow men get blamed. If you go on tumblr, womyn complain …
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:08 AM
3

Can I borrow this list sometime? I will quote you obviously. Brilliant, and quite comical.
/r/MGTOW10/11/14 02:18 AM
4

This is the type of behavior you get when you have a complex, opaque tax system. As I mention above, I now live in Hong Kong. I can do my taxes myself, all at a flat tax of 17%. Despite spending ten years as an investment banker in New York and being educated as a lawyer, I don't think I would try to do my U.S. taxes (not to mention the fact that having an external accountant do it helps avoid audits). The whole system is a big work program for lawyers, lobbyists and accountants, most of whom do…
/r/MGTOW10/11/14 02:15 AM
3

A few observations: I now spend most of my time in Hong Kong. Here, if you don't work, you starve (although this is changing, much to the chagrin of the older generation). The amount of entrepreneurial activity is amazing, as is the dislike of the communist system. There is more innate business skill and acumen within one square block in Mong Kok than there is practically any Fortune 50 boardroom; I own a house in Westchester County New York. It is extremely difficult to find good tradesmen to d…
/r/MGTOW10/11/14 02:01 AM
2

You raise some very good points -- thanks.
/r/MGTOW09/11/14 11:32 PM
8

Anytime a country is seeing growth in waitressing jobs outstrip manufacturing, you know the economy is fundamentally doing poorly. The former are typically part time with low pay (labor supply exceeds demands, even today), while the latter form(ed) the backbone of the American middle class. Why has there been such a weak economic recovery since the Lehman Crisis -- completely uncharacteristic of economic behavior post other downturns? Why have real wages for Americans not budged over the past de…
/r/MGTOW09/11/14 07:08 AM
3

I couldn't agree with you more! With $18 trillion of on-balance sheet, and an estimated $170 trillion in off-balance sheet unfunded, liabilities and counting. The U.S. will be in dire straits ten years from now as the baby boomers are solidly in retirement. Godspeed.
/r/MGTOW24/10/14 12:08 AM
14

To state what may be obvious, part of this involves a bailout: finding a man who will bail out the woman from all of her past bad decisions and behavior. Does that sound like the demands of a strong, independent, conscientious adult? Unfortunately, this attitude is also embedded in much of feminist thought these days, which has roots in Marxism, except it is big government which is doing the bailout for past mistakes.
/r/MGTOW23/10/14 09:11 PM
2

Why is anyone surprised, however repugnant this is? This is reflective of a broader pattern in society. Take a few minutes and think critically about the entitlement state, the political process and political efforts to secure voting blocks, the "Womyn's rights" movement, and the portrayal of women as victims in society. It is part and parcel of the same thing, and if you speak up against it you are "anti-womyn".
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:19 AM
3

Why is anyone surprised? This fits the pattern in society, doesn't it? It's all about portraying women as victims to marshall state resources and state force, often with an undisclosed agenda of securing the female vote.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 11:08 PM
3

My wife was educated at Oxford and is a senior executive at a publicly listed company, and she clearly would rather make dinner for her family and bake cookies where and when possible (she and my daughter just did so this past weekend). She is very traditional in her views towards family in most respects. The Feminist view that women can't and shouldn't assume traditional gender roles is complete nonsense, and represents the "group think" mentality that many find offensive. We have been happily …
/r/RedPillWomen08/09/14 09:22 AM
2

The level of "group think" on the subject of male/female relationships is downright shocking, isn't it? Society, in particular the university system, has inculcated into women's minds that they are victims and systemically at a disadvantage to men (the so-called "patriarchy"). The close-mindedness ironically often comes from the "progressives", who are the first to trumpet their willingness to look at topics with an open and critical mind. Yet, they often resort to ad hominem attacks (you're not…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 12:08 AM
2

This is problem because the government, through its intervention and determining its preferences, is distorting the market, undercutting personal responsibility and relieving women of bearing the true costs. But you are right in that many trades pay well, are honorable and actually get stuff done (cf. a degree in Womyn's Studies).
/r/MensRights16/08/14 04:09 AM
1

Bingo! Spot on. Government intervention (to win votes) distorts the market, leading to inefficiencies.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 04:05 AM
5

I earned a B.S. in Biochemistry as an undergraduate. Biology is easy -- it practically was a soft science. Physics, chemistry, organic chemistry, math, etc. were the classes that really required hard core dedication. I got an A in biology and really didn't need to try. The guys who aced advanced physics or math classes were the real hard core motherfuckers.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 04:04 AM
2

Much of the entitlement state is centered on delivering benefits to single women when you really think about it. It is no surprise that more men lean towards the Republicans (even they are also Statists today) while women are more likely Democrats advocating State entitlements (of course secured through the use of State force).
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/14 10:05 AM
0

Women's Studies degrees > heavy student loan burden > unemployed or under-employed > yet another Obama bail out to garner votes. The Statist business plan is fairly straightforward.
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/14 10:01 AM
1

Most brilliant economist indeed! Thanks.
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/14 09:59 AM
2

Most of the risk actually centers around marriage. Yes, you can get hurt before marriage, but the risks are more limited and can be more readily mitigated (e.g., multiple forms of birth control). Before marriage stay away from crazy, and get to know someone before jumping in bed with them. Regarding marriage, I would say: think carefully whether you generally want it, or are caving into societal or family pressures research potential downfalls, including reading stories and other accounts about …
/r/MensRights21/07/14 10:17 AM
2

You know you are on the winning side of an argument (intellectually, at least) when the opposition suppresses free speech and respectful open dialogue.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:35 AM
1

To paraphrase the common saying, you know them by their actions. Thought control, pure and simple. Welcome to modern AmeriKa.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:52 PM
3

So much for fair, honest and open debate, right? You will know them by their actions. Disagree with my political or social point of view, no matter how rationally argued or factually supported? You're racist! or You're sexist! Welcome to AmeriKa!
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:01 AM
3

Well stated - thanks.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:22 AM
1

Thanks for posting - I'm also a big fan of Stefan's work and always find it well reasoned. As a man in his mid-40's, I think it should be mandatory for any young man contemplating marriage to do two things before walking down the aisle: (i) read through some of the divorce stories on Reddit and other blogs so he fully understands the true odds and consequences of divorce, as well as what the force of the State can do to them if they find themselves in that predicament, and (ii) watch Stefan's an…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 03:01 PM
2

You should try to Google it -- it read a good, objective article on the topic about a year ago and forget the periodical. Check out also the YouTube videos of Stefan Molyneaux (Freedomain Radio) who has done a few excellent videos on the topic.
/r/MGTOW04/05/14 03:39 AM
3

Good response to the nonsense post above. Thank you.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:00 AM
10

As a Feminist ("please don't kill me"), you are more than welcome here, and your thoughtful insights are appreciated. However, I have to say it, if a man goes to the Feminist threads and states he does not agree with the views expressed because of a range of facts, he gets plenty of down votes at best (n.b., you currently have 25 up votes on your post above) or gets banned at worst. Recently, on a thread about male rate, I presented some statistics on prison rape and how it has lead male rape to…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:43 AM
2

Remember the Duke rape case!
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 08:13 AM
1

Your description of modern dating as a disaster zone, and how the various groups react, is about as articulate and spot on as I have ever read. I also got a good chuckle out of it. Upvote!
/r/MGTOW25/04/14 05:01 PM
0

I currently split my time between Hong Kong and Shanghai. I find the concept of the Kept Woman (second and third wives) in Chinese society to be quite fascinating.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 10:21 AM
1

As a man in his mid-40's, I can confirm the power does reverse and does so quite viciously. It's funny to watch, isn't it?
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 10:17 AM
1

The State progressively providing social benefits to women, a key voting block, has continued to play itself out over the past 40 years, and continues to grow. There is some interesting political commentary available about women's suffrage, the growth of the nanny state, and unsustainable national debts (both funded and unfunded / off balance sheet liabilities).
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 10:00 AM
12

Absolutely - spot on. The wrath of the universe would be poured down on you for being so deceptive.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 03:25 AM
1

Yes, combined with a media circus and a guilty before being proven innocent verdict due to political correctness.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 11:17 PM
0

Another Duke rape case?
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 02:35 AM
2

Particularly if they get thrown in jail for victimless, violence-free crimes like drug possession for personal use.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:42 AM
1

Divorce is certainly one aspect, but women having children (often multiple children) without first entering into any type of marriage relationship is also an enormous problem, so divorce/alimony never enters into the equation to begin with. I read one statistic that 40% of all women having children today in the U.S. are having children out-of-wedlock. In some thriving economies, like the one here in Hong Kong, the out-of-wedlock birthdate is 3%, while Hong Kong children annually rank in the top …
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 10:39 PM
1

I don't think most of these young, twenty something Red Pillers actually realize their views on the Western entitlement state is a quintessential Feminist position.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 04:01 PM
1

There are very strong correlations between the rise of the welfare state and the breakdown of the family. For example, the out-of-wedlock birthdate among Black Americans at the advent of the Great society was 15%, slightly higher than whites at the time. Today it is 74%. I'm not making any value judgments, but what is clear is that children in single parent households are exponentially more likely to grow up in poverty and suffer all the negative effects of doing so. The argument is that because…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 03:57 PM
1

Many of these so-called Red Pill Advocates here are borrowing from the Feminist / womens' rights play book in toto, and they don't even realize it. The entitlement state (including ACA) / regulatory state / deficit spending model follows the Feminist political agenda to the letter. Washington D.C. elites, including lobbyists, are telling people on Main Street how to live their lives, including what insurance to buy (if any) and how much they need to pay for it.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 03:47 PM
2

Agree that government jobs really don't contribute much to overall economic activity. Most are ministerial or regulatory (unnecessary) in nature, not productive.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 12:51 PM
10

Be certain your sons study one of the sciences or engineering. If they don't want to go to college, a young man can make a great living in one of the trades if he goes on to start his own business. Encourage him to be an entrepreneur in his chosen field.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 10:04 AM
4

Very good point about infrastructure spending. If you are going to incur debt or print money to counter a downturn, that's what needs to be done for, among other reasons, to ensure people build their skill sets and work track record. Instead, people were paid to sit on the sofa at home and watch Jerry Springer.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 10:01 AM
2

Now that's good! Upvote!
/r/MGTOW04/04/14 09:11 AM
0

Your arguments, in many regards, aren't far off what many evolutionary biologists would state. Certainly male and female sexual practices have co-evolved over four million years plus of hominid evolution, ergo a natural Ying/Yang relationship. It will be interesting how the advent of things like penicillin and the nanny state impact evolution over the next 100,000 years - certainly birth rates are markedly declining.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 06:02 AM
1

Two thoughts: (i) you just can't engage with someone like this - no matter what the objective facts are they won't listen to reason, and (ii) a decent portion of her tirade is reflective of modern Feminist thought, despite her being labeled a nutcase.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:51 AM
1

How many are aware that 94 out of every 100 workers' comp claims are filed by men? Men work at significantly more dangerous jobs. We all about the supposed glass ceiling, but what about the glass basement?
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:45 AM
1

The most violent domestic relationships? Actually, lesbian couples. But you will never see that publicized in the mainstream media or in sociology texts. Indeed, it is actively avoided. Doesn't fit the narrative.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:42 AM
1

Behavior and individual choices matter! But don't raise this with the PC crowd -- it doesn't fit the script, and you'll be accused of sexism despite the objective facts. Welcome to Orwell's 1984.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:30 AM
1

Certainly, a good portion of Feminist dialogue is right out of the pages of Orwell's 1984, where the search for the truth is not a motive to be considered. Feminism is now a catch word for a sophisticated lobbying group.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:28 AM
4

Right out of the pages of Orwell's 1984.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:23 AM
2

You're right -- the two Statist parties don't present much of a choice, and both are corrupt in my view. This is why I lean strongly towards libertarianism and voluntarism. Government inevitably screws things up. For example, few realize that the poverty rate in the U.S. was declining at a rate of 1% per annum before the advent of the Great Society. Since then? We have spent in excess of $21 trillion, through various programs, and the rate has been static, if not increased marginally. Out-of-wed…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 03:58 AM
2

Thanks for the comment. I am amazed at how many young guys who proclaim to be Red Pill advocates here are supporting the growing nanny state, particularly the ACA, which means higher-than-market premia for them (to cross subsidize other Democrat political constituencies). I suspect a lot of these guys don't have much real world experience, in contrast to your poker partners. Frankly, you can pick up some of these guys arguments written on this thread, drop them onto the Feminist or Women's Right…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 03:33 AM
0

I am an entrepreneur and have been (and currently once again am) in the position of being a smaller competitor. It's the nature of the beast -- if you want to succeed, you got to be better than the others, including the big guys. But guess what system best entrenches the big guys, because they have the money to engage in lobbying and influenced peddling? -- yes, big over-reaching government with politicians that need to raise re-election funds. If a company is selling its products significantly …
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 03:01 AM
1

This is straightforward: single women (often with dependent children) are more generally looking for the security of the big government Nanny state (some would argue due to their evolutionary biases). This is why you see womens' groups and Feminists come out strongly in favor of things like Obamacare -- this is no coincidence. This also makes me scratch my head why so many so called Red Pill men support the ACA -- their position is in line with practically all women's groups. Married women, who …
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 02:48 AM
1

Thank you. Finally another voice of reason on this thread. Up vote.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 01:33 AM
1

Thank you. These Muppets commenting on this topic just want their subsidized/ free health care, and could care less where the system will end up in twenty years. Instead of providing examples of how government control and administration have worked (Nanny state), they engage in ad hominem attacks. Is this the red pill subReddit? Appears to be just the opposite given some of the clowns it has attracted.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 10:54 PM
-6

Again, nice try. You Muppets appear to honestly believe the D.C. beltway mandarins can run the healthcare system better than the free market? - amazing. Why don't you start by living in a geography, such as Hong Kong, where there is in fact a very limited government with a flat tax, and see what life is actually like and observing the wealth creation over the past twenty years vis-a-vis countries like France, Greece and Italy, where the Nanny state controls significant portions of the economy. T…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 10:46 PM
-7

Nice try. I indicate my credentials because I have a substantial amount of experience, and I can readily see through the nonsense, talking points and cliches people use when they clearly don't know what they are talking about. There is a lot of smack being thrown around by ideologues looking to protect their vested big government interests. There is no "stonewalling" above (whatever that may mean), but a fair amount of substance for a blog, easily recognizable by someone knowledgable about the t…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:33 PM
-1

You can eliminate military budget in its entirety, 100%, and you still are running a sizable deficit. It is entitlements that are killing the country.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:27 PM
-1

I don't know why people down voted you - this is the most astute comment on this thread. Big government and the Nanny State is part and parcel of feminism and the female voting block. Small, constrained, limited governments, are indicative of free markets, competition and change (witness technology over the past ten year, which government interference has been notably absent from). Put it this way: big governments protect entrenched interests and are able to be influenced by large money concerns…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:19 PM
-1

One also needs to distinguish between quality of the care capable of being delivered and people's individual behavior, and incentives that are presented. Quality of care pre-ACA was generally quite good (with exceptions, generally indicated geographically), with American institutions such as the Cleveland Clinic, Mass General and Mayo Clinic doing global best-in-class work. Problem in the U.S. is and unfortunately will continue to be individual behavior -- obesity, smoking, drug use, animal fat …
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 04:06 PM
-4

You're clearly talking rubbish. Among other things, I built a healthcare company from nothing over a 9 1/2 year period and sold it two years ago for $285 million. Healthcare is one market I know inside out. And Glass -Steagall/de-regulation/subprime mortgage crisis of 2007? Again, you're clearly an novice. I practiced securities law for three years on Wall Street right out of law school before I became a healthcare entrepreneur. Please stop wasting my time.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 03:04 PM
6

Sorry, Libertarian here. And very shortly the biggest expenditure will be interest on the debt itself.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:38 PM
-3

Interesting, I just noted the Affordable Housing Act of 1992 and it's impact on the 2007 crash, and it's clear you didn't even make the connection or understand the relationship. Go study the topic for real, rather than forming a view based on cliches and talking points, and we'll have a grown-up discussion. Additionally, no one claimed their was a bona fide cash market in healthcare in the U.S. before The ACA. Perhaps you should look at the experience in Hong Kong between 1965 and 1997. So the …
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:36 PM
-6

Sorry, but you clearly aren't looking at the empirical evidence if you think the government is smarter, more efficient and better able to institute productive change than the free market. For example, Compare what has occurred in technology over the past decade, with minimal government involvement, vs. businesses such as Amtrak, the Washington DC schools, and the U.S. Postal Service. Study also the impact of the "Affordable Housing Act of 1992" and the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on the m…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:09 PM
7

Well stated!
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 09:16 AM
2

Do you want the neighborhood Vaseline queen teaching your kids morals, and helping to oversee their education?
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 09:13 AM
2

This is an important point - do you want a woman who has laid down for twenty or thirty guys being the one teaching your children morals? Do you want this woman helping to oversee your kids education and extracurricular activities? As a betting man, it is less likely things will work out well for the family with a Vaseline queen as the mother.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 09:12 AM
4

I have seen estimates ranging between $88 trillion and $232 trillion for the on- and off-balance sheet liabilities for the U.S. Government ($17 trillion is currently funded). The growth in the Nanny state is an enormous problem that will be solved by: (i) meaningfully cutting entitlements at some point in the next decade, (ii) money printing, leading to an erosion of spending power and savings through inflation, and (iii) default/failed debt auctions, when creditor nations refuse to purchase the…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 08:54 AM
15

Based upon a good amount of sociological research, the reality is that children are actually safest and best develop empathy for others with their biological fathers, not their mothers, even when you account for differences in time spent with the child. The liberal professors who publish these findings always try to interpret them in a manner most favorable to women and feminism, but the consistent findings are the facts. You rarely hear this in the mainstream media.
/r/MGTOW02/04/14 05:07 AM
1

Who's to say that mankind's efforts at technological advancement aren't reflections of larger truths -- for example, the internet at generating connectivity across space (ala' remote viewing) or video games being reflective of larger reality (the rooms on the video don't actually form until the player, or consciousness, enters the room). We're all just playing a large, community video game parallel to the matrix.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 11:20 PM
1

I forget the name of the other physicist who spearheaded the digital reality hypothesis. You have to be a little crazy to view the universe in such a no traditional manner. All very fascinating.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 11:16 PM
2

The theory that underpins this is one of male disposability and female victim hood (the scarce egg).
/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:51 PM
3

People need to remember the Duke rape case and how the lives of those young men were destroyed by a false claim and an over zealous prosecutor.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 08:30 AM
3

Your comment is spot on. It is about election constituencies, and the societal mis perception that women are victims, while men are disposable.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 08:12 AM
4

Check out also some of the theories of advanced physicists such as David Bohm who do believe our universes is digital (granulated at planck's length), which means time is digital also. There are some smart motherfuckers who do genuinely believe that this is all advanced video game far beyond what we can imagine. Godspeed.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 07:14 AM
9

Funny how we always hear about the glass ceiling but never about the glass basement that protects women from difficult and dangerous jobs.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:28 AM
4

Solid advice here, indeed.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:27 AM
2

If I am being honest, there is only one woman I have dated in my 40+ years who genuinely seemed 'somewhat' engaged by world events -- my wife. However, even she is not that interested in many topics that will meaningfully affect us and our daughter in the future, such as the national debt (both on and off balance sheet liabilities) and issues of personal privacy (domestic spying) and individual liberty (the socialization of healthcare). She would rather not think about them. The women before her…
/r/MGTOW31/03/14 08:55 AM
2

Thanks for posting - this is an extremely important issue for all. I think female directed schools have an image of what young boys should be, when in fact naturally it's is much different than what young girls are. Boys need to be boys, and drawing conclusions about them at a young age is nonsense. When I was in fourth and fifth grade I was considered a problem child, and requiring remedial intervention. I was very active, and frankly bored with the stuff my female teachers were pushing (it was…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:22 AM
4

All great referrals - thanks. I have been a fan of Stefan and Karen for a year or so, and their material is very well researched and presented. I am always baffled by people who are anti-Libertarian. Any critical look at the U.S.' current situation tells you how badly big government, and all it's corrupting influences, has taken a toll on the everyday person.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:12 AM
1

Aren't men the ones who are the predators in society (or at least that's what they would like you to believe)?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:02 PM
2

The reality is that women initiate domestic violence as often as men, if not slightly more frequently. Women are injured more often given the difference in size, and men defending them themselves from the initial onslaught. You won't hear that in the mainstream media or on campus.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:51 AM
1

Double thumbs up on Molyneaux - one of my favorites (I am also a Libertarian, which makes complete sense to me after decades building a business in the real world). Also, Commentators like Karen Straughan effectively and intelligently undercut the Feminist position - she's a great spokesman for genuine equal rights.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:48 AM
1

I am a married man in my mid-40's with a young daughter. I am independently wealthy given that I started, then sold, a business for a nine digit sum. So, in many ways I am an successful, establishment figure who has bought into and succeeded within the system. I have to be honest: most professional men my age would offer the very same advice you offer here to their sons - or at least be extremely cautious about marriage, ensuring that there is a pre-nup in place with an ironclad infidelity claus…
/r/MGTOW20/03/14 10:57 AM
3

I lived in Asia years ago and spent a significant amount of time in Jakarta. I once took a week long vacation by myself in Bali, staying at the Four Seasons at Jimbaran Bay. My first night there I met one of the most beautiful woman I have ever met in my life, a local Indonesian girl (c. 20 years old) with a petit figure but beautifully endowed. We spent the entire week together, including a lot of time sunbathing in and around the box pool attached to my standalone villa (which had a fence arou…
/r/MGTOW20/03/14 10:39 AM
1

I would say that a paternity test should be the default whenever a baby is born and a birth certificate gets issued, but that runs counter to the strength of the female vote today and the burdens on the public welfare system in the U.S. I read someplace that ~10 % of the time men are on the hook for children who are not biologically theirs.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 08:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter