TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HarryShachar Archive

View 3 posts and 46 comments by HarryShachar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

My point of view is that people are showing us a false dichotomy, they are saying it's either help men or women. But we can do both! it's not that difficult to understand
/r/MensRights07/08/20 03:17 PM
2

Wow I can't say I'm surprised. Does anyone have the court files and documents so I can check them out?
/r/MensRights16/05/20 09:40 AM
-8

Look, dude, I'm a true blue MRA but you can't say that women had it the same during history, and there isn't really anything you can do about that. Women were easily treated as objects and you can't deny that, just like you can't deny that men are the losers in most custody cases. We need to try and break the echo chamber and do a reality check once in a while.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 07:14 AM
7

I mean, isn't that the exact definition of genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights30/04/20 09:46 AM
1

Men crime rates are driven by culture, education and circumstances, not the Y chromosome.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 06:22 AM
1

I haven't read that yet
/r/MensRights13/04/20 12:54 AM
2

The zohar book is actually interesting and I would recommend it,but the Talmud isn't worth the effort in my opinion.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 12:25 AM
3

In judaism,there is a law where you "can't spill sperm" or waste sperm for fun, however you want to translate it. It derives from this- Talmud Niddah 13a. https://www-myjewishlearning-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.myjewishlearning.com/article/masturbation-a-touchy-subject/amp/?amp_js_v=a3&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=15867365453609&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s "לא תשפוך זרע לבטלה"
/r/MensRights13/04/20 12:10 AM
0

Still better than death...
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:28 PM
1

Meh fk it, let's give the fetus a chance at life and not kill it because of bad circumstances.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:21 PM
2

A) abortions hurt the baby. B) Infants with diseases arent aware of themselves. They will potentially survive. Can we kill them? By your logic, 100%.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:19 PM
2

It's better than killing it. That adoption system do needs to get better though
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:18 AM
3

Look, you are weighing 9 months of pain (and an extra few hours at the end) against 85 years of a person's life. There isn't even a comparison to be made. The lesser evil here is probably giving the baby to adoption.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:16 AM
1

1) think of it like this- is the fetus going to be a person? If there is a 1% chance it will survive, we can't take that away. 2) It's not a moral itch, it's saving a person's life! Oh and my first point disproved your second point already. 3) Well, the article states that this is because they don't get enough love, and that their schools are full of crime. This is not abortion's problem- you can't be loved whem your'e dead. This is the adoption system's problem,which they need to fix. 4) Why is…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:13 AM
2

I don't support that argument or the church, and I've never thought of that
/r/MensRights12/04/20 09:59 AM
3

Well, is taking away 85 years from an unborn child justifiable? A child who has a chance to also go through the same nine months? If you made a mistake, the deal with it. You can't kill a child be you screwed up.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 09:56 AM
1

I think of it as not whether it's a person yet, but whether it will be. Do we believe a 10yo is a person? Well, the fetus usually has extremely high chance of becoming a 10yo, therefore a person, and we cannot rob that of the child. Even if the fetus has a low chance surviving we cannot rob it of that chance. If you have financial issues, you can always give the kid to adoption.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 09:54 AM
1

If you are talking about babies being born into poverty, you can always give them to adoption. About your first sentence+ being isn't any of our choice, so we must reserve all our other choices. If someonr wants to die, it's not illegl.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 09:51 AM
1

How about this. Abortion is killing babies- even if the fetus has a 1% chance of surviving,we can't rov it of that chance. That is murder, and like 99% of humans believe murder is bad.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 09:48 AM
1

Again, instead of killing the baby, why can't the parents give it up for adoption?
/r/MensRights12/04/20 09:42 AM
1

Why are drugs immoral? And also,why is making them illegal bad?
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:48 AM
3

1) Instead of aborting, why not give up for adoption? Again, like you said,lesser evil. 2) Eh imma need some sources on the last bit
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:47 AM
1

1) We still haven't come to an agreement on whether it should be legal or not- should something bs legal if we agree it's immoral? You still haven't answered that question. 2) About fathers- I totally agree
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:46 AM
2

Okay,you made a few points, so I will make a numbered list! 1) Taking the right of choosing abortions over pregnancy: it's quite simple here. We have a clash of rights- the right of life, and the right of choice. Now, why is the right of life more important than the right of choice? Because being able to choose derives from being alive to do so. This proves the right of life must be prioritized. 2) 9 months of pregnancy is not an inconvenience, and leads to PTSD 40% of the time: You have to deal…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:44 AM
1

A) I said my "guess" B) What motivated me? Could be a couple of things- (remember I do not justify you being banned) playing devil's advocate, postiong because I had and idea/thought I wanted to share. It's simple enough.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:20 AM
2

Very good argument. I'm convinced.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:06 AM
5

It's not "give birth against their will", it's "face the consequences of their actions". About your last sentence- so we let ladies with unwanted pregnancies murder the baby in a hospital rather than in her house? Also, no person would stab themselves in the uterus, so really abortion is the main way this is happening. Also, if something is immoral, why shouldn't it be law? Let me throw something else into the mix- do you think the fathers get to be part of the decision? I believe so.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:52 AM
5

I'm talking morally. Practically, shutting down abortion clinics and having her A) not inject something that would kill her baby or somehow damage the kid and B) not tearing the kids head while giving birth. Pretty simple. Once she is doing something that harms another human being, it's immoral and it should be a crime.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:44 AM
5

I didn't understamd that.... Are you saying she will suicide? Because I can't do much about that (practically that is). But theoretically, killing herself knowing she has a baby which is going to come out is an immoral act.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:36 AM
6

The black market argument may happen, I'm not knowledgeable enough in that area to tell. Ok time for your main argument. Why can't you force a woman to give birth? Because of nine-ish months of inconvenience and a few more hours of pain? Remember, it's not her life damaged we are talking about here, she can give the baby up for adoption (as for emotional harm from that action- you made a mistake, deal with the consequences.). Those nineish months are sacrificed for a whole lifetime,which is usua…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:31 AM
1

Nice explanation. Life DOES begin before birth, (in my enlightened opinion /s) because as long as the sperm connects with the ovum the chances of a baby being born are extremely high. Like in our justice system, if we have 100 people, 99 of which did something and we can't prove which is innocent,we let them all go and take the risk because we must let the innocent person remain free. We will take the risk that the baby is borm with defects and may live a terrible life, but we cannot take away h…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:15 AM
8

If you are talking about the queer theory, it rejects the traditional sexes and genders,which is something MRA wants,right? Not being judged based on gender and sex.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:30 AM
10

It's not to all kids probably because he is speaking from experience. That would be my guess
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:23 AM
4

In Judaism it is
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:20 AM
1

Good OP
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:12 AM
8

And now (a few weeks ago I think) China is on the human rights council
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:09 AM
1

Source? Also the wage difference is measured based on the same profession.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 10:18 AM
2

Thank you for this amazing comment! Very nice
/r/MensRights09/04/20 02:17 AM
2

Oh lol
/r/MensRights09/04/20 01:23 AM
2

Thank you :)
/r/MensRights09/04/20 01:02 AM
2

Can sources be found on the website? I couldn't find some
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:18 AM
7

This is an awesome idea, and very nice too. Everyone needs advice- I could use some advice myself
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:04 AM
15

Well yes.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 11:53 PM
2

Huzzah!
/r/MensRights30/03/20 08:20 AM
3

I'll do this quick- While the revolution of feminism has brought great joy and rights to women, it has also create a toxicity against men, wether it's culturally, legally, and military-wise. Quick example: By law, in all of Britain, a female cannot be charged with rape, as the law refers to the 'penetration' of the body. You can also see many sentences that can be said about men, but not vice versa (Just scroll for a minute down this subreddit and you will find an example). As the cherry on top,…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:52 AM
4

We need to find new terms- feminism has always been about women, and MRA is against modern feminism. Just clarifying
/r/MensRights14/03/20 01:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter