TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hawanja Archive

View 1 posts and 873 comments by Hawanja on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

OP, if you want to meet women, then concentrate on meeting people. I.e. developing a social network of friends not necessarily just connected to your work/employment or family. So go out and do stuff, use sites like meetup.com and such, meet like minded people. The more people you meet, the more women you meet, the more chances you have of hitting it off with someone. Then just concentrate on looking good and not being a loser/having something to offer and just let things happen. Also don't flip…
/r/ExRedPill17/09/23 10:32 PM
14

If you think she’s wifey material than good for you Maybe he isn't husband material if he's trying to get in a 3 way with two women he just met. Maybe that's why his girlfriend kicked his ass to the curb.
/r/ExRedPill14/08/23 06:30 PM
18

Maybe she dumped him because he's out at bars soliciting 3-ways from skanky bar-flies. Sounds logical to me.
/r/ExRedPill14/08/23 06:27 PM
7

Dump him. Seriously, dump this asshole before he gets violent
/r/ExRedPill10/08/23 03:03 PM
1

To be fair I've experienced this myself. I had an old gf who would start fights on purpose because she wanted the make up sex afterwards. Yes, she was a very toxic person.
/r/ExRedPill07/08/23 03:17 PM
3

You just gotta keep at it. I actually met my wife on ok cupid, and I'm not ashamed to admit that. it's just another tool in the shed
/r/ExRedPill01/12/22 03:49 PM
13

Just go with an open mind, try not to be nervous. Treat her how you'd treat anyone else you're friends with, be cool, etc. If it happens then it happens, and if not then no worries. Have fun
/r/ExRedPill25/11/20 06:52 PM
1

So I imagine it's probably really hard to go out and meet women during a pandemic. It's not like you can go to clubs or whatnot anymore like one used to. Most people meet their partners through their friends (you date your friend's sister, or a girl your friend introduces you to, etc.) So if you're not having much luck meeting women, just try meeting friends in general, like expand your social circle. The more people you meet, the more women you encounter, the more chances you get to find women …
/r/ExRedPill16/11/20 08:03 AM
1

Don't say anything. Don't even block her. Just ghost, and let her go nuts. It really sounds like this person can't stand not being the number 1 thing you're always thinking about, that is unhealthy.
/r/ExRedPill03/11/20 02:54 AM
1

Wait so this guy was a redpill, incel person? Was this your boss at work? In that case man I feel for you.
/r/ExRedPill20/10/20 05:50 AM
3

Well do you mean actually physically knock you down, or just verbally, put-you-in-your-place kind of thing? Because neither of those should be acceptable at a work place.
/r/ExRedPill20/10/20 05:15 AM
3

I think everyone who despises the red pill ALWAYS picks out the worst from it. Well what’s the “good” part of it? Projecting false confidence? Treating women like they’re disposable, or like they’re children? Assuming that your woman’s “hypergameous nature” will cause her to instantly against her will jump up and down on the penis of any man who walks by who has larger biceps or a bigger bank account? Treating other men like they’re competition to be squashed or dominated? Are these the good thi…
/r/ExRedPill13/10/20 10:06 PM
10

So your first problem is assuming that anyone “NEEDS” anything. Some women are attracted to what you would consider a “strong guy,” some are not. Some women will cheat no matter who it is, others will not. Women are not a monolithic block that all believe the same things and act the same ways. That’s the first mistake of this red pill shit, they think it’s like turning on the cheat codes to a video game, then they can’t understand when the girl they like still tells them to get lost. Rollo Tomas…
/r/ExRedPill13/10/20 09:29 PM
7

Lol. No, I'm happily married, thank you. What reasoning exactly helps you get behind this red pill stuff?
/r/ExRedPill13/10/20 05:22 PM
26

What exactly do you want people to rebutt again? You went out with a girl, then broke up, and your parents hate each other but not really or some shit? Like, what am I supposed to be opposed to? Except that you read that Rollo Tomassi horseshit, I guess. That guy is a fucking sleazebag, if you follow his advice you're an idiot.
/r/ExRedPill13/10/20 05:35 AM
10

If the guy gets in your face again, talk to him like he's a child. They really hate that. If you feel like he could be dangerous, then do not approach him. Best not to risk it.
/r/ExRedPill24/09/20 08:36 AM
3

Just say something like "I don't really date much" or "My history is pretty boring," etc. As you go on you'll probably want to come clean if things get serious. Also, if the first couple of candidates don't work out, don't let it get you down. Don't get hung up over any particular person, just keep at it and you'll be ok.
/r/ExRedPill08/09/20 01:53 AM
1

Annon's point is stupid and childish. If the relationship you're in resembles this, then leave, because that is not a healthy relationship.
/r/ExRedPill08/08/20 05:28 PM
2

She'll be back.
/r/ExRedPill24/07/20 02:22 AM
3

Chances are it's infected his friend group also, you may discreetly want to check them out, talk to their parents, etc. The good news it's most likely a fad/phase. One thing you can do is to try and associate him with more minorities. Go out to eat Mexican food (hard during a pandemic,) listen to diverse music, voices, buy some books and leave them around, etc. Also, don't be afraid to debate him. If you hear him spout some b.s. take it on and show him the real truth, but in a positive way. This…
/r/ExRedPill18/07/20 12:09 AM
2

And let me tell, this is a toxic, nasty attitude to have. r/SelfAwarewolves
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 11:32 PM
1

How is Awalt, women-are-children, or the idea that a women's value is directly proportional to the milage of her vagina seeing women as human? Because it sounds like the opposite to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 01:18 AM
1

It's literally about seeing women as human beings. Yeah, that's totally what all that "awalt, women-are-children, women lack agency" shit is all about. There's a post currently in new where one of these redpill morons compares a woman to a commodity that devalues depending on how "used" it is. Long story short, the evidence shows that it's the exact opposite of what your'e saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/19 02:27 AM
1

Bullshit most males here are children of high school age to early twenties who haven't figured out women are actual human beings yet. Normal men in healthly relationships don't repeat the stupid shit you coconuts believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/19 01:44 AM
1

The stupid, it burns.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 10:01 PM
1

I'm a man you fucking cabbage. Also I'm not "shaming" anyone, only pointing out the facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 10:00 PM
5

The sub is r/purplepilldebate not r/helpidiotsgetlaid
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 09:14 PM
3

People in general are emotional That's not what you said two comments ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 08:57 PM
5

That women are pretty emotional is an established fact. This is the thing that is not a fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 08:54 PM
4

Except in real life they are no more emotional than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 08:27 PM
3

What the fuck are you even talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 08:27 PM
2

The real assumption is about the "average woman in general."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 07:14 PM
10

I'm not talking about some STEM major who acts like every other woman when it comes to relationships. Well how does "every other woman" act when it comes to relationships? Is it really so rare to find a woman who doesn't collapse into an emotional mess at the slightest hint of strife? Have none of you people ever experienced an amicable break up? How come you guys never talk about emotional men? Like the kind of guys who stalk women, threaten every other guy who looks at her twice, or fly off th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 07:05 PM
8

Just look at what the guy is asking. He's making so many fallacious assumptions about women it makes my butthole hurt. These people believe the stupidest fucking shit sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 06:53 PM
4

Is OP 26 and a virgin? He certainly seems to think like one. Also, only you are seeing breeds of dogs here. The question on whether rationality is correlated with anything in dating is legit. It is legit only insomuch that it's a question. That does not mean it's an intelligent question. Hey, how come you guys never talk about "logical men?" I mean, because if you used logic and reason you'd see how moronic all this shit is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 06:49 PM
1

How is it not insane to dislike conservative political views, is what you're really saying. The other side is saying the same thing about your views. How is it not insane to support throwing children in cages, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 06:38 PM
1

Wow, what was that, like 2 minutes? You are such my bitch. And yes, bitch, the real reason is money. There is no conspiracy to emasculate male readers in comics and make all superheroes gay or whatever. You people believe the dumbest fucking shit sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:34 PM
1

Yeah, I have. Concession accepted.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:32 PM
1

No, an incel is so desperate he'd fuck any woman. I clearly have standards, unlike you. Lol. Ok buddy. Let me give you some advice, the whole surely, woman hating thing? That tends to turn women off, regardless if whatever country you're in. You're never going to get one to touch your wee-wee if you keep this shit up. Well, the vice president of marvel seemed to have disagreed on that. From the same article: One retailer told ICv2 that increased diversity had brought a new clientele to his store…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:29 PM
1

Then this conversation is over. You're too fucking stupid to continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:18 PM
1

Maybe my problem is that I'm not American, but Brie would look like a 5/10 at best in Eastern Europe where I live. You're an incel, huh? Now you're just lying for no reason. Ironman can't even crack the 40k sale mark nowadays when it cracked the 200k mark easily in the early 2000's. See here Marvel's official numbers although they stopped updating it in 2012 because of the massive decline in sales. Can you demonstrate to me that the decline in sales is due strictly to fan backlash against Marvel…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 02:05 AM
1

So you people have been trying to tell me "get woke, go broke" correct? Then you tell me this: How many comics women buy or how much they spend does nothing to support or refute whether sales are going up or down. This is a simple concept that even the most obtuse minds should have no trouble comprehending. Can you guess what I'm going to say next? Idiots...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 12:01 AM
1

Of comic book and manga sales, women make up about 37% of the audience, and spend around $370,000,000 annually in The United States. That's just for comics. So yeah, the sales numbers speak for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 09:39 PM
1

You're the one crying because girls are watching movies and reading comics here pal, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 09:29 PM
1

No, I'm just not into ugly girls. Look son, give it up. Nobody believes you. No, it's 22%, since 37% takes manga into account as well. 22% of superhero comics are bought by women. Even with this bullshit restriction, that's still $220,000,000. That's two hundred and twenty million reasons for Marvel and DC to make content for women. It would be irresponsible to not tap into that market. The comics they're making aren't appealing to anyone since they're not selling, $220,000,000. Yes, they are pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 06:03 PM
1

Have some self-respect and stop projecting your desperation on others. Well, I think she's attractive. IDK, maybe you're only into 2-D girls or something. According to this it's 22% female. https://icv2.com/articles/news/view/38709/nycc-insider-sessions-powered-icv2-a-demographic-snapshot-comics-buyers More like 37% 63% of comics and graphic novels are purchased by men, 37% by women Which in an industry that makes an estimated 1 billion dollars a year is roughly $370,000,000. That's why they're …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 05:37 PM
1

I get angry when people feed me this "Feminism is ruining comics/movies" shit, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 05:29 PM
1

Look at this and tell me that's hot (NSFW warning) : Yeah, I'd hit it. You would too if you weren't pretending. It isn't. That's why they're losing giants amounts of money doing this. First off, it is. That's why you won't go look it up and tell me the percentage, because you know I have your ass over a barrel. Secondly, Captain Marvel made $1.28 billion dollars. They are not losing "giants" amounts of money, they are making "giants" amounts of money. You are on crack.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 04:00 PM
1

She's ugly as fucking hell. I still remember seeing her hank hill ass in some movie and I almost choked on my food. You're only lying to yourself son. A minority, what's your point My point is it's a significant number for these companies to make content for them. Please see my original post.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 03:17 PM
1

You conflated people fapping to nudity with people enjoying the movie. Not sure why. You do realize people could have rubbed one out to them tiddies and still think the movie was utter shit, right? Yeah but there wouldn't be assholes still talking about it a year later. There's youtubers and shit whose whole career is shitting on this movie. If she would've got naked in it I propose these incel fuckwits would've forgot about it a long time ago. And yes, for a movie to include gratuitous nudity i…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 03:13 PM
1

I wouldn't want to see Brie Larson naked even if you paid me. You're lying. This doesn't hold up because the people in these industries make these changes even when it loses them money. The comic book industry has been gutted because of these decisions and yet they always double down on it. Ok Mr. Smarty pants. Please tell us the percentage of comic book readers that are women. While you're at it, please do the same for movies and video games.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 03:02 PM
2

The argument I made is that all the people who shat on Captain Marvel would've still slapped their salami to it if she got naked in it. You're the one who presumed this alternate version of the movie would star a different actress, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 01:52 AM
3

Please. You would've been perfectly happy to see Bree Larson's tits. Don't try to deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 01:44 AM
17

The problem is what you're describing as "male entertainment" is not in fact entertainment exclusively for males. I assume what you mean is block buster sci-fi/fantasy/superhero movies, correct? Unless you're talking about professional wrestling or some shit. Anyway, women are allowed to like those things also, and they have money that's just as green as yours. So there's nothing wrong with making a superhero movie once in a while where the lead is a woman and doesn't exist solely to fuel your a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 03:32 PM
-2

All that bullshit you typed is irrelevant, because AGAIN, YOU DONT NEED TO BE MARRIED TO HAVE A FAMILY. Women’s wombs and peoples friendship aren’t locked behind a “you’re not married yet” wall. Yeah that's true. But what makes you think your nieces and nephews are going to come visit you? Especially when you have such a shitty attitude about women. You’re such a wonderful person that you’ll take someone saying “marriage is unnecessary to have a loving family life” as someone with a shitty perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 09:25 PM
-1

So you don't know. Allow me to explain. It's because the older you get, the less friends you have. The older you get the more difficult it becomes to meet new people and make connections with anyone (let alone potential romantic partners.) Not only that, but the friends you DO have grow apart, move away, or die. That's the reason why old people are so invested in their families - because they offer companionship. Ever notice how older married people (who have the means) are always going out, hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 06:18 PM
0

Why do you think that old people (in general) are so invested in their families? Also, I doubt you have much idea what the real world is. The things you believe give evidence to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 05:28 AM
0

Son, have you ever met an old, unmarried man who wasn't depressed? Whatever kid. You'll find out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/19 12:21 AM
1

Quality of life for older men is shittier when they're not married. Yeah, I know you don't think so. Just watch what happens to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 07:03 PM
0

Men who get married live longer then men who don't. So there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/19 05:12 PM
6

It's because when people do manage to find decent paying work, they have to spend all their money paying off college loans. That's money that could be going to buying consumer goods and services, i.e. spurning the economy. Not having savings is bad because when said person does find themselves out of work they have no cushion to fall back on, and will have to make sacrifices, whereas people with savings can use those until they find another stable source of income. Thus even less money goes towa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/19 06:56 PM
0

None of those guys are on reddit bitching about made-up bullshit like society is going to collapse if women don't fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/19 05:12 PM
5

What, that they are allowed to choose who they have sex with? That is the underlying assumption this argument OP is putting forth relies on btw - that women should not have the ability to say no to relationships. OP and his ilk would be just fine going back to the days when marriages were arranged, with severe negative social implications for any woman who refused. Hey, isn't there a part of the world that's like that today, like India and the Middle East? You know, where men are allowed to have…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 05:41 PM
6

I think it's great, because asshole incels will not get laid and be unable to pass along their asshole-ness to the next generation. The human race evolves without these dickwads. If you think that sounds ignorant and savage, that's what all this shit you morons spout about the negative long term effects of a liberated sexual climate sounds like to me. Really think about what you're saying here - you're telling us that if we have a "liberated sexual climate," which by that means women are allowed…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 03:01 PM
8

Maybe because being a good provider is a good thing regardless of if you have a mate or not and this shit you children believe is all bullshit?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 02:44 PM
2

You people believe the dumbest fucking shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:46 PM
6

Jesus this fucking shit is so childish and rediculous. It's like you're all a bunch of twelve year olds, pretending you've touched a girl's boobs or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 02:35 PM
2

There hasn't been any stigma for the last 30 years. You could get all the porn you wanted with very minimal effort. Every bookstore and video rental place had a porn section, and PPV porn has been a thing since like the 70's. The difference now is that it's free, so kids can get it anytime they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/19 02:53 AM
3

No. You forget that porn was a thing before the internet. It's not like you had to drive a hundred miles to go get it. I think what it did do is make dumbass children think real life should be like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/19 02:41 AM
1

The men who get angry at this usually do because they strike out, and they think it's unfair that they should have to do all the "work" when it comes to meeting/seduction. They're generally pissed at this social dynamic because it's not a Konami cheat code for getting in a woman's pants, and they don't like the fact that even though they buy a woman drinks and take her to dinner she can still refuse to have sex with them. They feel like this because they're entitled little children, and don't un…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/19 05:11 PM
14

Jesus, you people are so full of shit. As you get older into you middle age, sex matters less and less. The very fact that OP thinks this is still the dominant driving force behind a relationship for a middle aged man shows he has no clue what the hell he's talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 03:18 PM
2

Well, we don't need to murder the guy. But maybe now that he got his ass kicked he might learn not to antagonize random strangers like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 03:11 PM
4

Here's my thing, right? There are millions of other people out there who are just as underprivileged and unloved as this guy, but you don't see them screaming at random people and starting fights. Sure, there's no doubt lots of reasons crappy people turn out the way they do. But ultimately everyone chooses and are responsible for their own actions. Unless this person is mentally ill and can't help himself (which he very well could be) he chose to scream at those people in that restaurant, and ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 06:10 AM
2

I'm sure the woman he was randomly screaming at for no reason would agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 02:32 PM
4

Usually one has empathy for the innocent victims, and not the the raging bucket of retard who makes everyone's lives around him a living hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 02:20 PM
2

I take pleasure in assholes getting thier comeuppance. I notice you're not complaining about napoleon's raging overreaction to being smirked at. You know you're not allowed to threaten people like that. He's lucky that's all that happened to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 02:18 PM
4

Was he showing empathy for the people he was bitching out? I empathize with the people in his life who for one reason of another have to put up with this guy's fucking shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 06:47 AM
4

Well it's the same as it is in this video, right? Some dude with zero confidence who's also self-conscious about one thing or another imagines a woman is belittling him by the look on her face, and since it's a woman it's doubly insulting because he's a pissant little crybaby that can't handle the fact that girls don't want to fuck him. I imagine a lot of guys have this problem, especially little pieces of shit like this. Btw, I'm glad this guy got his ass kicked. I don't give a fuck that he's s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 05:55 AM
4

Yeah man, these people are not "experts." They are instead children who think there's some kind of Konami code that'll get you laid. These people have no idea what they're talking about, please don't believe anything you read here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:51 PM
2

Holy fuck, this guy needs a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 04:41 PM
1

Can I get those links?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 02:54 AM
1

You mistake me for someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 03:30 PM
1

He should have to pay because it is his child. Whether or not it's legal to terminate a pregnancy has nothing to do with it. How old are you, btw? Because you don't seem to remember our last Republican president.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 03:29 PM
1

Something we finally agree on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 03:26 PM
2

Many people think it is. That's why abortion is going to banned. Life is winning. I hope they do it, because it will mean the end of the Republican party. Please, shoot yourselves in the foot. Either condoms solve all the problems they're capable of preventing, or they do not. Either condoms are enough alone, or mulligans are needed Hypocrite. So let me get this straight - you think it's perfectly fine for a guy to impregnate a "dirty worthless putrid whore" and not have to pay for the child's w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 05:25 AM
1

Abortion is not murder, because a fetus is not a human being. But, once again, this has nothing to do with child support. Stop trying to change the subject. I notice you have no problem banging a "dirty worthless putrid whore." Maybe I'm not supposed to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 09:51 PM
1

Yes, women should also insist on condom use. But that in no way has any bearing on my stance on abortion, because abortion is not birth control. You understand these two things are only tangentially related, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 09:40 PM
1

What you're doing is attempting to deflect away from the issue at hand. Abortion has nothing to do with child support. Whether I'm for or against it has nothing to do with my stance on child support. You're doing this because you know your arguement has no basis in fucking reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 06:55 PM
1

No, my advice to men was use a condom. If you won't do that then face the consequences. Why the hell is someone who's so anti-child also anti-abortion? You'd think guys like you would want abortion to remain illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 06:18 PM
1

Abortion has nothing to do with this, it's a totally separate issue. Stick to the subject please.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 04:13 PM
1

Well, toxic Male sexuality is, yes. The kind that involves groping and spinning plates and date-raping drunk women, that is. Normal ordinary Male sexuality between consenting adults is not. But that is not relevant to the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 02:59 PM
1

My response is your child doesn't care about your politics, and should not have to suffer because you're a manwhore whose only reason for living is to get his dick wet. It's unfair to the children to not have the father supporting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 02:54 PM
0

What the hell does that have to do with anything? But for the record no, I have a major problem with it. You'd think redpillers would be pro-abortion, wouldn't they?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 07:30 AM
1

Sure
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 07:13 AM
1

This is the dumbest shit I've ever read. You don't want to pay child support? Use a rubber you fucking idiot. Your bastard child didn't get a say in being born you deadbeat asshole, why should he have to suffer because your irresponsible ass can't keep it in your pants? God damn you guys are the worst fucking people ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 07:10 AM
2

Where did you get this from, exactly? Because it sounds like bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 04:18 PM
3

Seems to be a lot of incels in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/19 04:17 PM
3

I like how everytime one of you guys talks about this subject, it's always the woman's fault. Maybe the reason why men aren't getting any is because they spend all their time at home playing video games and beating off. What do those "high value men" all have in common that you guys don't? They go outside once in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 10:28 PM
2

It's almost like this red pill crap is made up bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/19 04:44 PM
1

Nah, you can keep it deleted. Fuck that guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 02:40 AM
1

Well that's a convenient excuse to run from a debate. How can I debate someone who's too dumb to know what he's saying? For example, when you said this: And for the record, it's totally natural that my woman has had a few partners in her life before me. I wouldn't have it any other way. But if she has a demonstrated history of devaluing sex and showing poor self-control etc, then that's a big red flag. GET IT NOW? You reinforced my position. This is the exact thing that I've been telling you tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 10:45 PM
0

OP, this is a sub filled with children, who believe ridiculous things. Don't come here for advice, some of the worst people ever post here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 07:05 AM
1

After all that stupid shit you just said, it'd be a waste of my time to argue any further. You're too far gone to convince. Nothing short of a life changing event will change your mind about anything. Also, I'm not wrong. About anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 06:57 AM
1

Fuck all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 11:18 PM
0

So you're a self described 'fat, ugly, slob' who had tons of sex before he got married. Unless you're a guitarist in a rock band I call bullshit. Please describe what this process of being a fat, ugly, slob lady killer looked like. It's called "talking to people." You kids interact with the world via Fortnite and text messages and shit, so you wouldn' t know. Men an women have different sexual psychology and vastly different access to sex, so to hold them to the same set of expectations is logic…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 06:51 PM
1

And how many fat ugly slobs are actually having sex with lots women? Yeah, didn't think so. Well, there's me, for one. Actually it has everything to do with behavior.. because it is a label that literally refers to a specific set of behaviors Yes, the exact same set of behaviors. I'm glad we agree. Because (shocker) MEN AND WOMEN ARE NOT THE EXACT SAME It's like you're making my points for me, but instead of being correct you're suddenly a bigoted asshole. Nowhere in your illogical and barely co…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 02:20 PM
0

This is 100% bullshit. If a fat, ugly slobby dude has sex with lots of women, he still gets to be called a Stud. But if a woman is really attractive, or a big ugly fat slob, she still gets called a slut. Because in real life, it doesn't matter what the guy looks like, what he says, or who he is - he always gets to be called a "Stud," and it doesn't matter what the woman looks like, what she says, or who she is - she is always called a "Slut." Because this distinction has nothing to do with the i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 02:06 AM
2

It means she doesn't want to be your girlfriend. If that's what you want, move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 10:16 PM
1

Lol. Triggered much? I'd report this but I'd rather leave it up and let you humiliate yourself. You're doing a much better job than I ever could. Translation: My attempt to twist your words around and make you look stupid backfired, so now I'm going to play it off like I don't care. I do this because I have no leg to stand on, because my arguement is filled with dumbass bullshit made up by teenagers. Apology accepted. If you wanna claim science is made up, try having even a rudimentary understan…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 06:27 PM
1

Your hysterically triggered rambling non-arguments say otherwise Bitch you're the one who said "it's not worth a response" motherfucker not me. Just because you're ignorant of the fundamental difference in power dynamics between males and females in the sexual marketplace, or even the most basic tenets of evolution by sexual selection doesn't mean we 'made it up'. Go read a book or two for a change yeah? Blah blah blah fuck off, no one cares. And yes, you did make it up. That's what I mean when …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 05:12 PM
2

Then she's not the girl for him. Why does he then have to go shitpost on the internet about it then? Just find someone who shares your values.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 05:09 PM
1

If it's not woth a response. then don't respond. Nobody cares, especially me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 03:59 PM
2

In real life that dude, if given the chance, would've had just much as sex as the girl did. She is getting shit for the exact same behavior he wants to engage in. It's hypocritical bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 03:59 PM
5

Ask yourself, what if the girl said the same thing to you? As in, "If you don't meet me now, you can forget it!" How would you react to that? If you would react negatively, why would you expect her to react any different? Take the hint, and move on. Life isn't fair.
/r/ExRedPill15/04/19 07:37 AM
1

Firstly, the above post conflates sex-positivity with sluttyness. They are not the same thing. BUT.. I prefer a sexually discriminate woman, and would never think of committing to one who has a history of racking up an astronomical body count with very little to no strings. There are a myriad of reasons for this, both deeply instinctual and also practical. ​ This is bullshit, and I can prove it. How come whenever you idiots go on about "N count" and so on does the N count of the man never come u…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 07:21 AM
4

Just an FYI, liberals and leftists in general have less hangups around sex in general. All the shit up is describing comes from a very right wing worldview. A liberal man wouldn't give a shit about a women's N count, for example. Long story short, liberals have more sex, because they care less about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 02:48 AM
0

It means he had a shitty lawyer, and should've tried harder to keep his marriage together.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 10:05 PM
2

I could get on board with this. Marriage is only a contract anyway, I see no reason why one couldn't build in a termination date, (maybe with possibility of renewal.) I disagree about all the pre-nup stuff though. Co-ownership of assets goes with the territory. If you have the kind of assets that need protecting, then it's perfectly reasonable to ask for that before you're married. If she doesn't agree then she's not the girl for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 10:02 PM
1

Expressing preferences does not mean complaining. Nah, you guys are complaining. As long as wolverines eat your balls it's fine with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 04:23 AM
1

And this is relevant to me because? Because you are complaining about women who don't want to fuck you while wanting a woman who doesn't enjoy sex at the same time. Dude you seem to carry more hate than people who dislike sluts. Hate for you people? That is correct. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 03:31 AM
1

Here's a guy saying women should lie about their N count (because men don't like sluts) This fucking moron thinks women uncontrollably throw themselves onto the penis of a random attractive stranger, even if their man is right next to them, because they're sluts. This knuckledragging moron thinks that women with high N counts aren't capable of "pair bonding," because they're sluts So does this asshole. And this asshole too. Yet another fucking genius who can't handle women who like sex. A wolver…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/19 02:17 AM
1

I hope wolverines eat your balls.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 11:06 PM
1

I'm not the one who keeps talking about this shit, because I - along with all the other normies - figured this shit out a long time ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 09:03 PM
1

We only seem to talk about redpillers in this sub, but whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 08:59 PM
1

Holy fuck, talk about missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 08:46 PM
1

I think that REDPILLERS all want untouched virgins, yet complain that women don't fuck them. I say this because they complain about these two things, constantly, over and over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 08:45 PM
1

Bullshit. You think you're the first person to say these things? The redpill subs are full of this exact same conundrum - men who never get laid yet constantly complain that all women are sluts. You'd think guys whose only goal in life is to get some would want women who like sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 04:52 PM
0

See this is what I don't understand about you people. You complain that men don't like slutty behavior, Women know that some men don’t view that behavior in a positive light and so if we agree they have agency, they are responsible for the potential relational consequences that could occur later in life. Yet at the same time complain that women aren't slutty enough, Women also know that a higher percentage of men would probably be upset if they hold out on the slutty behavior they were exhibitin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/19 03:17 PM
1

The best way to deal with this behavior is to just stop talking to them. She'll either get really jealous after you stop giving her attention and start giving you some, or she won't. Either way you'll be better off.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/19 01:03 AM
27

Trade places with one of these morons? So I can be an asshole and not get laid? No thank you.
/r/ExRedPill07/03/19 05:48 AM
2

No, there is nothing wrong with having friends of the opposite sex. Don't believe the redpill bullshit, platonic relationships are a fact of life for millions of people. Maybe the guy was attracted to you at first, but if you're both mature adults there's no reason you can't be honest-to-goodness friends without wanting to bang each other.
/r/ExRedPill28/02/19 08:00 PM
1

"Be Yourself" is not bullshit. What it doesn't do, is somehow magically allow you to bang every woman you choose. In real life there is no Konami code that allows you to do this. But if you're honest, and don't try to be something you're not - as in, "Be Yourself," when you do find someone you connect with, and she likes you for what you are and not some horseshit illusion you made up, then it'll be far more fullfilling and last longer.
/r/ExRedPill18/02/19 06:57 AM
2

60K? Lol. Today I learned top models and gold diggers should be going after me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/19 07:12 AM
3

He doesn't. I doubt this person has ever worked in a place that doesn't require a paper hat.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 05:09 PM
2

You know, if being short was really your problem, then do something about it. Save up, and get the surgery to extend your limbs a few inches. If you were to do this, somehow I don't think it'll solve your problem. Because the reason you can't get laid isn't because of your height. It's your attitude. You know what turns women off? Whiners and complainers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 04:42 PM
3

New here so I’m not sure if something similar has been posted before. Lol. There was a corresponding thread asking this exact same question about women yesterday. If a woman has a problem about how many women you've been with, whether it's too many or not enough, then she's not the girl for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 05:30 PM
0

I would pick either, depending on her personality and who she was. How many partners she had doesn't figure into this decision for me. However, I wouldn't want to marry a 28 year old virgin, too many problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 05:22 AM
5

You're not doing yourself any favors by buying into this redpill bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 04:18 PM
3

Rollo is a goddamned idiot, gifting other idiots.
/r/ExRedPill08/12/18 06:54 PM
1

Lol, like this would ever happen. They'd have to like, implant an explosive in every male child's penis when they're born to enforce compliance.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 04:27 PM
1

I just broke my own nose from facepalming too hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 07:42 AM
1

Lol. You know I've been married for three years now, with a woman I've been with for six. It's the best relationship I've ever been in. The lesson for you son is no, having sex and relationships with people who are not "the love of your life" does nothing to ruin your ability to "pair bond." Literally billions of people do this every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 10:45 PM
1

It would fix this problem, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 10:20 PM
2

FFS - nobody said you have no connection, only that the person isn't your end-all-be-all soulmate. God damn, what the hell is the matter with you people? This shit isn't that complicated. Jesus, you guys need to get laid more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 10:11 PM
1

Dude, you were the one who started talking about unrelated shit like "a woman that you met who was a bitch to you one time.". If anything, YOU'RE deflecting. But that's not unrelated. That is the very crux of the conversation. You said this: The point is that it's not "teenage boys" shaming men for being a virgin. It's WOMEN who do that. I'm asserting that it's not "WOMEN" but rather one woman who was a bitch to you one time, who you're then blaming every woman ever for her actions. This is corr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 03:53 PM
2

I give the chances of Atlas not being a man at less than five percent.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 02:52 PM
1

I should put this on /r/SelfAwarewolves
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 03:01 AM
1

Lol I see you're starting to make things personal. I have a feeling the next step is personal insults. What you're doing here is attempting to deflect from the conversation, because I'm correct. You're deluded if you think women dont care about a guy's virginity. I think any woman who does is not worth associating with. The reason why you can't get over this is because you're insecure. Yes, why DOES the opinion of women who you're trying to date matter? \s If you're a virgin, and the woman your'…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 03:00 AM
0

The point is that it's not "teenage boys" shaming men for being a virgin. It's WOMEN who do that. No, it's not "women." It's a woman that you met who was a bitch to you one time. At what age was this? I was eighteen, a senior in high school. Obviously they're not going to be "turned off" if you're not a virgin. They'll say to your face they dont care, regrdless of whether they care or not. When I said "I didn't go all the way with," that means I didn't have sex with them. So in case you need thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 10:21 PM
1

Well, I don't agree. I think you can have casual sex with some people, and then more intimate relationships with other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 10:12 PM
0

And that's fine, you're a kind of person who is okay with "more casual" relationships\sex. Other people do not share this preference, and other people are even MORE casual than what you described. What I'm saying is that you can be both casual sometimes, and more committed other times. Obviously not what I meant, and you're aware of this. That would be me making assumptions about what you're saying. I don't know you, I only know what you post. I wouldn't want to put words in your mouth. Then tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 09:30 PM
1

What about the women who get significantly turned off if\when they learn that a guy is a virgin? What about the women who just flat out think LESS of a man if he's a virgin? What about them? Who cares. Idk dude. I went through high school and college, and the guys playfully gave each other shit if one of them was a virgin, but it was all with good intentions. Women, on the other hand, even if they're virgin themselves, tend to discriminate against virgin dudes. Then we had very different experie…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 09:22 PM
2

Yeah, that's kind of what you do if you're a rational healthy person. That's your problem right there. I'll tell you straight out that every girl I've had sex with was not "the love of my life." I was certainly into them enough to date them and want to have sex with them, but were they all soulmate, romeo & juliet I-would-jump-off-a-bridge-for-you relationships? Hell no. Some of them were casual. Some of them didn't last long. That's what normal, rational, healthy people do. It takes time to fal…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 09:16 PM
1

Having orgies and sex in club toilets is disgusting no matter how you spin it. Who are you to judge what other people are into? And 20 partners at 23 is still damn lot. No it isn't. Fun fact: It seems like the smaller the town a person I meet is from, the larger the N-count is (god damn I hate using this terminology.) You know why? Because teenagers get bored and there's nothing to do but fuck each other. So if you want your kids to not fool around move to a big city. She had orgies and fucked r…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 05:54 PM
1

He's probably the most toxic person I've seen on any of these mansophere subs. You realize he's a guy, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 05:42 PM
1

You must not know a lot of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 05:41 PM
2

Men are shamed for not having sex, while women are shamed for having too much sex. This should read as: Teenage boys are shamed for not having sex, while women of all ages are shamed for having too much sex. The only reason we have this double standard is because some men are insecure, and can't handle the fact that their girl has sucked a penis other than theirs. It's the man's problem here, not the woman's.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 05:41 PM
2

Since when is every person you have sex with "the love of your life?" Was every girl you've banged the love of your life? Such bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 05:35 PM
6

Atlas is probably the worst person I've seen in these subs. Any offspring of that monstrosity would probably murder him for the insurance money.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 08:57 AM
3

Exactly. She didn't do anything he wasn't willing to do himself. Yet for some reason she's a massive slut and he's a "victim" because he hasn't fucked as many people as she has. Such bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 08:52 AM
3

If you became sexually active at 16, then it's about 3 per year, which is not that many. This describes the sex lives of many normal, moderately attractive people. What if he had orgies and sex in public bathroom stalls? Somehow I don't think you guys would think that's a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 08:13 AM
-1

Wait, did this guy just forget to log out of his alt? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 07:58 AM
5

It's all just insecurity. You know how you can tell? What if the roles were reversed, how would it be different? Let's say this guy banged twenty girls, and did all kinds of freaky sexual stuff, and his fiance was the one who only had six. Do you think she'd give a shit? Do you think we'd even be having this conversation? Of course not, because her having more sex than him implies she had a life before she met this guy. It implies he's not the most important thing in her life, that her existence…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 07:52 AM
1

Right. It only really becomes a problem when one person wants more than the other person agrees to, right? So it wouldn't be wrong as long as both you agree to it in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 04:47 AM
7

Well if you both agree to it beforehand, then it's not really "using" someone, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 12:24 AM
9

I think "80% of men on this sub are incels" is probably more accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/18 06:13 PM
13

Every time I come here it gets more embarrassing. It's like you people watch rap music videos and think that shit is real life. Men with wider faces are more likely to have higher testosterone levels, and therefore are more likely to seek sexual novelty. You people believe the stupidest fucking shit...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/18 05:28 PM
1

He doesn't care about the working class one iota. Isn't the working class the people you're talking about, that is the people who are becoming irrelevant? It's not the rich people. So I'll ask again, which policy is Donald Trump enacting to stop this? Him playing golf every weekend isn't stopping the elites from evolving into super fuck-machines, or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/18 12:45 AM
1

The election of Trump and the current micro trend toward Nationalism is in fact a last ditch global effort to stop the oncoming tsunami of irrelevancy. Even if I did buy the rest of the bullshit you're selling, (which I don't,) how do you figure electing Donald Trump is an "effort to stop irrelevancy?" Like which specific policy, exactly, has Trump enacted or even talked about which would prevent this scenario from playing out? If anything, conservative polices would accelerate this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/18 12:04 AM
2

At a certain point, all of this is irrelevant. It's great to be able to understand an incel's motivation, but that doesn't change or excuse his actions. When someone does something horrible, why he did it is not as important than what he did. So when some incel loses his shit and goes on a murder spree, it's hard for me to care about how he was bullied his whole life. That may help to prevent future tragedies, but it doesn't lessen, forgive, or excuse the current tragedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/18 06:59 PM
1

Such people shouldn't be admired, even if they do get laid more than you. Have some self-respect, people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 05:53 AM
1

Let me ask. She's makin' me breakfast right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 02:56 PM
5

Download the script and re-enact it with action figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 05:07 AM
3

I cooked a burrito with a SousVide
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 04:53 AM
1

Hey how ya doin
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 04:47 AM
3

Hey that's great, congrats. Just don't tell me you have some kind of mind-controlled sex slave just because she was a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 06:17 AM
2

You poor, poor man. One of two things are going to happen. She's either going to get extremely clingy, to the point where it's uncomfortable, or she's going to realize that having sex with only one person in her life is bullshit and dump you after a little bit. If you're not a total douche to her it might take a few years. Either outcome is going to suck for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 06:07 AM
2

That is the dumbest shit ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 05:56 AM
1

Yeah, I do think it's totally cool, because I also think it's totally cool for people to decide if and when they want to have children, and not cool for you or anyone else to tell them otherwise. See, you think you're being "shocking" and stuff with your description. What you fail to realize is that our society condones the killing of human beings all the time. Cops kill people. The military kills people. People kill themselves. Corporations spew poisons into the air that give people cancer. Com…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 07:17 AM
1

Except in real life it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 05:58 AM
0

That's bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 05:30 AM
1

Come back when a woman gets a gun, gets in a car, and blows away eight or nine people. Then we can say "its the same thing." Abortion is not murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/18 05:29 AM
2

"Biological desire for virginity?" That sounds like bullshit. Are there any studies to back that up?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 10:08 PM
0

My point is the subjects discussed don't automatically make a sub toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 10:05 PM
1

No, abortion is not the same thing as murder. Terminating a pregnancy is not the same as getting a gun and shooting someone in the head. Do you have examples of radical feminists going on killing sprees, yes or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 10:02 PM
1

Can you give me the name of radical feminist who has gone on a killing spree lately? No, it's not hyperbole.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 03:37 PM
2

But isn't the point of these subs to talk about these subjects? So what should they talk about? Which kitchen apron gives the best knee support so they can give blowjobs and make sandwiches at the same time?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 03:35 PM
12

Those things you just mentioned aren't toxic subjects, in and of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 04:37 AM
1

I'll start caring when they begin engaging in adult murder, like redpillers tend to do time to time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 04:35 AM
2

It already is mainstream. You can see the results in how fucked up the world is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/18 05:14 AM
2

So you'll be casually dating a woman, then when she wants to make it exclusive, but you then refuse, she gets mad at you? Sounds like a normal reaction to me. What if the shoe were on the other foot, and you wanted to make it exclusive with a woman you're with, and she refused and still wanted to see other guys? 99% of you guys out there would have the same reaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 06:54 AM
7

It blows me away how much time and effort you redpillers put into the dumbest fucking shit. These people are fucking morons.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 05:54 AM
2

You're right, I don't know if any woman, everywhere in the world, through the history of all time has ever ruined a man career just because she was like bored, and there was nothing good on TV, so fuck it, it was just the thing to do. God, that sounds so fucking stupid. Anyway, I'm sure it's happened like once or twice. So I'll rephrase, and say never in the last 25 years of me being employed have I ever witnessed a female co-worker ruin a man's career because she was bored and wanted something …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 04:12 AM
0

You do not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 05:26 PM
2

Yeah man, that's total fucking bullshit. No one ruins someone's career just because they're bored and want something to do. I mean, it's like you people have never had a job, or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 04:47 AM
1

I'm sure you'll be fine as long as you don't sexually harass them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 04:45 AM
1

What same shit? All that bullshit about "white guilt," for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/18 07:44 PM
1

You seem to be saying the same shit they're saying. Also, the alt-right isn't exclusively American. I mean, if it quacks like a duck...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/18 04:34 PM
1

No, you just seemed to miss the point of my last comment - that this alt-right shit is also identity politics. You're accusing me of doing something that you're doing yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/18 02:15 AM
1

You seem to have not understood my last comment. Read it again. I know it's hard, just try real, real, REAL hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 08:10 PM
1

I thought my answer fit your last comment rather well.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 05:40 AM
1

Whatever. You don't want to think about it because it oppresses your fee-fees? Fine. But don't give me this shit that only white people aren't barbarians, because that's bullshit. P.S. - don't talk to me about identity politics, then spout alt-right terminology at me. That shit is the biggest colectivist snowflakey identity politics of them all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 04:56 AM
1

Clearly you do give a shit because you are the one trying to convince white people to feel bad about their race. Which is pretty racist I might add. It's your dipshit white-guilt accusation that I don't give a shit about, because that's a dumbass cop-out code word used by alt-right morons as a excuse to bitch and moan when somebody calls you out for being a racist shitbag. You can acknowledge slavery and it's legacy on inequality in modern society without feeling guilty about it. It's not suppos…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 04:30 AM
1

Who is taking credit for anything here? Find me where I said anything like that or retract your lying ass statement. It's implied in the whole "Our culture is superior to theirs because of white people" thing. Slavery was a universal fact, everyone did it. That is no rationalization for anything. That is history, those are the facts. Make of them what you will. It's a rationalization when you try to use this fact to dismiss the issue of slavery and it's legacy on our society. You're not the only…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 03:07 AM
1

I'm not trying to make anyone feel guilty. What I AM trying to do is to get you to stop taking credit for what other people did, and to get you to stop rationalizing away slavery.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:56 PM
1

No, I was talking about the effects of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade in Africa. Those images you're posting are different forms of slavery: Debt Bondage Child/Human Trafficking Forced Labor The sex trade All of which we have here (with the exception of "Debt Bondage," although some would argue that prison labor starts to approach that.) So if you're still taking that horseshit stance that because other people do these things then that renders it neutral, by which I suppose you mean ethically ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:39 PM
1

Actually no, you were trying to rationalize away slavery by saying other people who share the same skin color as the victims on the trans-Atlantic slave trade also did it. All I'm saying is that is a bullshit dishonest thing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:31 PM
1

I never "fed you" any "shit" about how "everyone who's white is a potential Elon Musk". I never said anyone deserves to live on less than two dollars a day. Nor did I defend infant cannibalism. You seem to have a problem with reading comprehension. The shit you're feeding me is that only white people are capable of building a decent society. You gloss over the part where I list all the fucked up things that happens in our societies and rationalize it away by saying other societies are worse, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:21 PM
1

No, they have not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_contemporary_Africa Well I was talking about the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade, which was based on race, but if you want to speak about the forms of slavery listed on that page, sure we can. We do have child trafficking, forced labor, and illegal sex trafficking on pretty much every country on Earth, so let's talk about it, if you want. Again, nobody said slavery was okay. You did try to rationalize it by calling it "neutral," because they…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:12 PM
1

Please... shut the fuck up with this "race hustling" shit. Insisting that you treat others on their actions and not the actions of other people who share the same race as them isn't "hustling," it's common fucking decency.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 10:07 PM
1

...and that's your rationalisation, like I said. You refuse to deal with or even acknowledge the fallout of slavery, yet you wonder why it's still an issue. You know it is true that Africans enslaved other Africans, but they've moved past slavery and it's reprocussions in thier societies. How come we haven't done that here?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 06:14 PM
1

Nobody needs to "justify" anything that happened before they were even born. Nobody should need to rationalize anything that happened before they were born either, but so far three of you assholes have done it in response to my comment, by saying "all races engaged in slavery."All I'm saying is your rationalization doesn't make it right, nor excuse it in any way. You could just accept that it happened and that our society is still attempting to deal with the aftermath, but instead you absolve yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 04:31 PM
1

Whatever son. Believe whatever stupid bullshit you want. Just don't feed me this shit that somehow everyone who's white is a potential Elon Musk while everyone else on Earth with a different skin color deserves to live on less than two dollars a day because of their genetics. Your stupid genes make you superior to no one, and if you're dumb enough to believe this idiotic race-realism shit then you're too stupid for me to bother talking to. I've already got you admitting you're a loser and defend…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 04:27 PM
-1

Are we talking about whether slavery is okay? Well, no, it's not okay. But everybody's been enslaving and exploiting everybody else since time immemorial. The black slaves that whites brought to North America (and the islands in the Caribbean and South America) were captured by people of their own race -- other Africans -- and sold to the Europeans on the shore. So the fact that everybody was doing it renders the fact that whites were doing it neutral. That is complete and total bullshit, 100%, …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 12:35 AM
6

Welp, have fun being 80 years old and single, lifting weights and eating soybeans and shit, alone. I'll be 80 years old also, maybe not in the same shape as you, but I won't be alone. P.S. Please don't bullshit yourself into thinking you can defeat age. You can't, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 12:07 AM
1

All I'm asking is how, exactly, stating that other peoples besides white Americans engaged in slavery somehow justifies American slavery? That's like saying "Stop shooting my children," then I say "Other people also shoot children." How does that make it okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 12:04 AM
1

I guess that makes it okay then, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/18 07:22 PM
5

You don't understand, kid. When you get old, you no longer care about women "wanting your company." Seriously, how many old people do you know that fit this imaginary life you've conjured up? I'll tell you how many: Zero. This redpill shit is a cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/18 07:20 PM
1

What the fuck is a "prole?" You mean like a member of the proletariat, as in the working class? Why does that even matter, and what the hell does that have to do with any of this redpill nonsense anyway? How about this: live your life like a decent person. That's it - that's all it takes to attract a decent mate. Just don't be a fuck up. It doesn't matter which class you were born into, or how much money your parents make, or what you do for a living. You can be poor as shit and still be a decen…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 07:01 AM
2

This sub just gets more stupid and bigoted as time goes on.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 03:03 PM
3

What is your general opinion on "AWALT"? I think it's a load of shit, thought up by dumbass teenagers who are pissed the girl who sits in front of them in Math won't let them sniff her panties. It's the stupidest shit I've ever heard, and people who think it's real are morons.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 04:40 AM
1

Probably not, which is why you say such stupid shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 02:15 AM
1

What's not to understand? You're asking why women get pissed when they get "raped" - you did write raped in quotes, correct? When they do the very irresponsible, unthinkable act of drinking and attempting to have a good time in public. You also ask like a dumbass how "liberals" - by which I assume you mean everything who thinks it's not okay to date rape people - can support this idea that women are allowed to get drunk but also it's not good to date rape people at the same time. It's an extreme…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 01:53 AM
1

Yeah it's obvious you don't believe in it, since you can't seem to identify when you engage in it. theres no such thing as misogyny and even if there was, is conceptually irrelevant to this post Are you kidding? Your entire dipshit post is dripping in misogyny. You obviously think so small of women you can't even understand how they wouldn't like not getting raped. You don't even seem to think women should be allowed to get drunk and not get date raped. You haven't been laid in years, have you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 01:21 AM
1

Why even bring up misogyny made up bullshit Because you obviously have a problem with engaging in it. I mean, look at that stupid ass response you gave. That's embarrassingly dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 01:09 AM
1

All you have to do is flip the script to see why. If a man "froze up," wasn't comfortable saying no, and was too afraid to.. would he have the rights to go to parties without chaperones, go home with strange women (and other men,) and put themselves in positions where they can be "raped" or what used to be called "taken advantage of?" If you say yes to that, that being a man should be able to do these things without fear of being raped, then you should say the same for women. That's a good metho…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 03:29 PM
1

The more I read in this sub the more I'm convinced all you people are really clones made by aliens infiltrating the human race, to learn about us before the inevitable invasion.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 06:42 AM
2

I got married two years ago. The vendors didn't ignore me or my ideas. Since I was the one who paid for everything they seemed to treat my opinions rather importantly. Then again, my wife is super cool and didn't want a huge gigantic wedding. She didn't even want a fancy cake (which we got for $70 because we didn't mention it was for a marriage, just said it was for an "event.")
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 03:36 PM
1

That makes it sound like I have a specific area in my brain for people I've had sex with vs people I just talk two. That is bullshit. Your friend getting their psyc degree doesn't know what he/she's talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/17 08:43 AM
1

Which psychologists, exactly, say you know more about a man after he blows a load in your mouth? Tell me thier names.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 05:27 PM
1

First off, there is no "space in your mind" for anything to "occupy." I might look at him differently afterwards, but I would not know him any better than say, hanging out with the guy on a consistent basis for 10 years has enabled me to know him. This is dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 03:12 PM
3

The only thing I would know is what his dick tastes like. No further insights into his thoughts tastes, or personality is provided after a blowjob besides what flavor his spunk is. Your friend is fucking dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 11:48 PM
2

Bullshit. I know my best friend well. It is suffcient that I hang out with him. It is not necessary for him to bust a load in my mouth. Your ex is on crack.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 06:38 PM
2

That would mean a platonic friend I've known for years would have less of a connection with me than some cheap floozy I picked up in a bar one time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:46 PM
1

Tell you what, try and take a guess. What do you think, specifically, that I mean by this? What are the things you'd have to believe, to think the notion that "women are scared because men are 'waking up' and life won't be on 'easy mode' anymore for them" is a real thing that's actually happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 03:58 PM
2

I find the very notion ridiculous. It reminds me of that bullshit story that was circulating a few years ago about how feminists were "scared" that someone was going to invent a sexbot, and thus women would no longer get a "free ride." The number of silly things you'd have to accept to believe this is astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 01:19 AM
3

Well if I remember it right, TRP and the other assorted MRM nincompoops lost their shit when Obama decided to allow women in combat, did they not? So you're pissed off because only men are forced to fight in wars, yet you go bananas when women do the same. What do you want, exactly? Because you can't have it both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 03:39 PM
1

Holy shit you're bitter. That's right, I don't trust women to work overtime to get projects done. I'm must be a terrible person with no life experience at all. That is what you just got finished saying. Remind me to not buy any medicines from your company, I like the drugs I buy to be tested by people who earned their positions through competency, not simply because of their genitals. Why do you keep projecting this "nobody loves me, I'm a dickwad" thing? Who hurt you? Yet more evidence that you…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 03:15 PM
1

I was 10 in 1975 and 20 in 1985. Divorce was a very real thing then and common and at a 50% rate, higher btw than it is now. You're projecting. I saw a lot more classmates doing the parental shuffle than the I was abandoned by daddy shuffle. I was 10 in 1985, and I saw many people get divorced, as well as more than one single mom who's husband straight up left. That happened to two of my best friend's growing up, actually. It was a lot more common back then than it was today. That's nifty that y…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 07:46 AM
7

Then you and I have far different life experiences. If you're really as old as you say, you should have learned these things. So you're either lying to me, or you've grown into a bitter, bigoted, superficial person. I've seen more men get fucked over in divorce court and lose their children because they were too poor to fight a corrupt system. That really didn't start until the late 70's to mid 80's, which if you're really as old as you say you are is when you were in your prime. So for the firs…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 07:10 AM
6

I know you believe some very ridiculous things about women. If you're 51, then you should have enough life experience to have seen several women who've had their husbands run out on them and have had to work multiple jobs to raise their children. You should have met enough people by now to know how stereotypes are lazy thinking. If you're an executive, then you should also know the idea that "women" have it easy in the workforce is a complete myth. You should know how ridiculous and childish thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 06:45 AM
8

Not if you think "women" have it easy because you have to like, get a job and stuff. That is the stupidest shit I've ever heard. The way you people talk you'd think no woman in the history of forever has ever done any work in their entire lives. In the meantime an entire generation of women single handedly raised half of you dumbasses and bought you all nintendos and shit and paid for your education and made you dinner every fucking night. It's goddamn childish. It's the kind of shit teenagers b…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 06:13 AM
12

No, women are not scared of shit. No one really gives a shit about you guys or the stupid childish baloney you believe. The only thing that scares them is the tendency of the more crazy of you to flip out and go on murder sprees from time to time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 05:02 AM
1

Or you could just do it the normal way like everyone else and send your kid to school.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/17 03:27 PM
2

School is about socialization, not actually learning anything. That's why you go to college.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 10:33 PM
1

Too much structure, is what I meant. Sometimes kids should just be allowed to run around and be kids, use their imaginations, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 02:53 AM
5

Don't homeschool your children. Good god people... It's great to get the kid involved with stuff, but leave him some alone time to just chill, play with his toys, watch cartoons, have friends over without it being scheduled, etc. Too much structure can be a bad thing sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 12:50 AM
1

Have you ever been jealous of a partner because of a success they had in life? Not really. I was jealous once because a girl I dated had a nicer car than me. If not, what do you think of men who get jealous of their partners? Immature brats? Mentally unwell? Kind of understandable? Immature brats, yeah. Jealousy is a refusal to acknowledge your own limits and shortcommings. And by success I'm thinking more work related like they earn more money than you or something like that. But if you want to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 03:47 PM
2

Actually, I don't think you are anymore either. But I do think you haven't managed to find one meaningful relationship with another person, of any sex, in your entire life. It must be very lonely. This problem is entirely your fault, btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 02:20 PM
1

You're a virgin, aren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 06:36 AM
1

Too old to believe in this stupid red pill bullshit. The reason why I say this is because that snippet I quoted is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 02:48 PM
2

Nah, only "normies" do that shit. I swear, these people are fucking children.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 07:19 AM
1

Of course, an indirect conversation (BP-style) is still hoping for the same outcome, although they'll ramble on about wanting to start a non-profit or something to keep the conversation going, lol. I can imagine hatred for Trump is a big opener among the BP community, probably the biggest one if it were ever quantified. How old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/17 07:16 AM
1

All women are not like that. Being a dick to a girl won't make her want to sleep with you. Sexual strategy is moral, because it's really about procreation, not just getting your dick wet. You are the one who is amoral. Women are not children. Lifting a bunch of weights and acting like a petulant manbaby is not going to make women sleep with you. Forcing everyone to conform to your wishes (i.e."holding frame") doesn't make you look like a "man." It makes you look like an arrogant, spoiled piece o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 06:52 AM
1

All women are not the same. You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/17 05:00 AM
2

The Red Pill is not factually correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 02:29 PM
3

Studies have already shown that more attractive women have lower N counts Those studies are wrong, they don't have lower N counts. The difference is men don't give a shit when the woman is super attractive, and only uses it against her when they break up or whatever. Personally I think the whole "N counts" as a measure of value is fucking bullshit. If you're gonna go out banging everything that moves then looking down on a woman who does the same is hypocritical and dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 01:58 AM
1

I think you're just pissed because you're not as unique as you think you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 02:02 AM
1

It's the casual bigotry that does it. You may not vote for republicans, but you definitely align with them politically more than anything on the left.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:39 PM
1

Of course it does. I think though the subreddit doesn't allow talk of politics because then the whole thing would be about politics. But let's not kid ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:27 PM
1

Yes you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:25 PM
1

What's in it for you? A free and fair society.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 05:53 AM
4

Douchebaggery.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 05:13 AM
3

It comes to a point in any discussion, from which one must decide if it's even worth continuing. Your outlook is so very childish and immature that I think the only thing that can help you is life experience. Simply put, you need to go a few years and see the destructive effect this has on your life. But I can still say, this is the most childish, ridiculous, immature thing I've ever heard. I don't know if I should laugh or cry.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 04:12 PM
1

No, no one forced you to do anything. You're selfish because that's how you want to act. You know why? Because you're a child. You even said it yourself, " the easier it is for me to get what I want lol." Life isn't about simply "getting what you want," and if you actually cared about anyone you'd see how bankrupt that outlook is. Maybe the day will come when you realize you have no real friends or close relationships of worth, you might feel that tinge of regret.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 04:08 PM
1

What you just described is the most empty, pathetic life I could imagine. When I was seventeen I would've thought that would be cool. Now that I'm an adult with a few decades of experience I understand how sad that would be. What you people don't understand is that it's not about how many girls you bang, or how much money you have. It's about how you interact with other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 04:00 PM
1

Chad wins, hands down. Chad wins what, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 04:19 PM
1

This is the most selfish thing I've ever read.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 04:18 PM
4

You wanted proof it was selfish? Just take a look at your post here. Men don't cheat on their wives. So fucking another woman when you're married without telling your wife, that's not cheating huh? So what is cheating, in your opinion? Men can love their wives while having sex with other women. And men should do that. Can women love their husbands while having sex with other men? Should they do that? I actually don't. I tell girls to go fuck other guys all the time. I tell them to let Chads fuck…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 04:17 PM
5

Selfishness is a curious term, because everybody seems to have a different bar for where "self-interest", "self-respect", and "selfishness" all fall. I'm not going to debate what the definition of basic words mean. It's a way of removing the legitimacy from an argument without actually having a counter-argument. It's the kind of thing you get from scientologists. That is not its central tenant. That has never been used even remotely as a central tenant. You are just making things up at this poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/17 01:09 AM
5

It's a philosophy that eschews personal responsibility and glorifies selfishness. They say it themselves - "The Red Pill is amoral." It's central tenant is to do whatever you want no matter who gets hurt. It's infantile bullshit. It's the kind of thing teenagers believe before they grow up and experience the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 08:57 PM
9

I can't shake the feeling that some of the frustrations that are vented on this board are a result of false expectations created by porn. You're 100% correct. It's because a lot of the redpillers are literal children, who've never really had a meaningful relationship and think real life should be like the Bang Bus.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 06:03 PM
2

Sorry, who is this "Bluepill influence expert" exactly? Because bullshit is just bullshit, regardless of what stupid shit you believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:17 PM
1

What is your view personal view and thoughts on RP? It's immature bullshit made up by teenagers who have an inability to think about anyone but themselves. It's a very crude world view. Why do you have those thoughts about RP? Because it's similar to what I thought about women and relationships when I was 16. Then I grew up. Is there anything positive that is unique or almost exclusive to RP that you can get behind? Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/17 06:31 AM
5

Except in real life Redpillers believe this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 06:58 PM
1

You don't see how a thread about killing off all the unattractive men and dividing up all the remaining women is a power fantasy? When was the last time you even spoke to a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 05:09 PM
9

This is a thread about killing off all the "unattractive" men and dividing up the "surplus" women. How the fuck am I cherrypicking? Feel free to reveal to me all the nuance that's going over my head.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 05:08 PM
13

If we needed any more proof TRP is an infantile male power fantasy, this is it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 04:03 PM
1

Yeah I agree, all of these are false. Especially those last three.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/17 03:53 PM
1

So the guy who plays in a band isn't a loser, but all the guys that go to watch him that don't play in a band are losers? I thought terpers were supposed to be the ones that didn't understand nuance. Don't know where you're getting that from. But the way you defined status - playing in a garage band, having a good social media presence, and other regular middle class activities - amounts to the notion of "be interesting, have hobbies." That's not really "status" in any real sense, that is one be…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/17 10:30 PM
2

The way you defined status is essentially "don't be a loser," which you can file under the tell-us-something-we-don't-know dept. What trp fails to realise is that such trappings of status, such as wealth, fame, etc, that in and of itself won't make a woman attracted to you. It will only help a woman who's already attracted to you have more reason to want to date you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/17 08:01 PM
12

The "I have a boyfriend" line is a nice way of saying "I don't like you." Past that point, not much you're going to say is going to make her like you, in fact if you keep pestering her she'll probably get annoyed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/16 04:04 PM
1

It has happened, but so rarely that each time I didn't realize it until I'd already left and missed the opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/16 04:50 PM
1

... and he would have this "high socio-economic status" because he's rich. And Famous.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 06:13 PM
1

Sounded more like jealous lamenting about how he somehow doesn't deserve this woman and only got her because she's rich, but what do I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 07:47 AM
1

So all that shit where you said you were better looking than Stephen Merchant, funnier, etc - I guess none of that matters? Well, whatever you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 07:38 AM
2

I know you have a shitty attitude, and you get jealous of other men whey they score the women you think you deserve, for example Stephen Merchant. That is what this post is, correct? You getting mad because somebody is dating a super hot women that you think he doesn't deserve, because he's old? What you don't realize is that you don't "deserve" anything, from anyone. Women pick up on that kind of thing, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 07:28 AM
6

You have no idea what dating has been like for me. Seeing what your attitude is like, I can guess. Here's a hint: Try not acting like such a crybaby. I'm sure what you mean by "you people". It's good to be sure of things in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 08:17 PM
14

Jesus christ, you people are children. He's rich and famous, she's rich and famous. How does this suddenly mean you'll never get a girlfriend? It's like you people think life is one big TV show or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 03:45 PM
1

See, if it were one woman, I could get behind the "we-paid-her-to-make-Trump-look-like-a-rapist" thing. But when the women just keep coming, one after the other, and each one tells the same story, then it becomes too hard to dismiss. Kinda like Bill Cosby. But Like I said, we'll see. People like Trump just don't suddenly stop philandering. He'll assault a white house intern or something. Then all you conservatives will be in the uncomfortable position of not only defending the government - which…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 03:47 PM
1

See it's hard for me to not believe her when we have like nine other women who came forward and accused Trump of sexual assault also - including an ex-wife who claimed he raped her. Also this girl (who yes, is no longer 13. Time passes, and all) seems to be too afraid of all the death threats she's been getting from those good'ol-non-racist non-sexist white-collar white-folks-who-totally-didn't-vote-for-trump-because-he-promised-to-kick-out-all-the-brown-people-but-instead-jobs to come public. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 04:29 PM
0

Do you have any proof of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 05:32 AM
2

I know one. He's going to be our president. I heard he raped a 13 year old girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 05:31 AM
5

What does TPP think? I think the entire thing is total bullshit of the highest order. It's like a myth that guys tell themselves, so that they don't feel bad for not being able to get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 07:41 AM
2

It will always be bad for you people who believe this childish redpill bullshit, regardless of your skin color.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 06:36 AM
2

It's because of the same reason some men would cheat on thier beautiful, thoughtful, caring, sacrificing wives with some cheap disease-ridden skank.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/16 12:06 AM
1

If anyone is "subverting reality in favor of their personal bias" it's you. Chemist there is closer to the real world than you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/16 05:55 AM
5

His issue is that he's a bugnut crazy insane person who has no business being anywhere near the oval office.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/16 05:11 AM
1

I think that if I don't like a girl, maybe she's a self centered bitch or something, then nothing she does to her appearance would change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/16 04:12 AM
1

Bullshit, women are human beings, with thoughts and feelings, and just as much reasoning ability that men have. They are not ruled by thier "base instincts." You're pissed that women "gravitate" (what the fuck are they, salmon?) Towards good looking, successful men? Well No SHIT, SHERLOCK. Do men "gravitate" to women with big tits? Yes they do -but what about men who prefer small tits? What about men who like fat women? Have these men somehow overcome thier "base instincts?" Or could it be the e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 07:01 PM
1

What it will do, is make your relationship last longer, and lead to mutual respect. You know, treat her like a human being and all. The other thing you're not considering, is that maybe if a girl doesn't respond to you, is that maybe she simply doesn't like you, and all the stupid weights you lift and holdings-of-frame you do and whatever magic spells you redpillers believe in won't change that. Being an asshole to her also won't suddenly make her like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 03:04 PM
1

Well, that's total bullshit. Women are people you know, they're not like wild beasts, ruled by their "instincts," or like Pokemon you can catch with a masterball or some shit. They actually like, have thoughts and feelings, and such. I know this concept is alien to you redpillers because you guys are incapable of actually caring about other people besides yourself, but trust me, it's true. When you're a teenager or young person like 90% of all redpillers are, most of the girls will be virgins al…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 03:00 PM
1

You find something wrong with my advice? I am saying if your friends are assholes, then you should not be friends with them. Is something wrong with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/16 02:52 PM
3

Sure they do son, sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 09:21 PM
0

Nobody who matters will give a shit if you're a virgin. If your friends give you shit for it, then get new friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 09:21 PM
-1

Maybe the reason you can't get any is because you want to "dominate" a woman, instead of "love" her. Here's a hint: Try being nice to girls, maybe then one of them will like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 08:44 PM
-1

The only people who would judge you negatively for being a virgin are assholes that you should not be friends with. I know this is hard to understand when you're a kid, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with waiting until you're older. And if you're like 40 and still a virgin, go to the Bunny Ranch. Who cares? Fuck it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/16 08:36 PM
3

There are guys dissing it because of misogyny right here in this very thread. OP admits to not having actually seen it, yet he's shitting on it because feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 02:55 PM
1

The monster does not have a penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 08:28 AM
3

There actually isn't any feminist bullshit in the movie at all. No one says anything to the effect of "We're put down because we're women" or anything of the sort. The villain makes a throwaway joke and says "You shoot like a girl," but that's about it - no get-back-in-the-kitchen jokes, or we-can-do-it-better-because-we're-women stuff, anything of the like.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 08:25 AM
1

Just saw it today. If you can get past all the bullshit, it's actually a not half-bad movie. I would've liked it better if it had actually were part of the old Ghostbusters universe (perhaps Venkman's daughter or something,) but for what it is, it's not too bad. There are a lot of jokes that are a little too silly, and more than one that fall flat. Also at the end it suddenly turns into 300 with ghosts (over the top slow motion ghost battle scene) but it's not a rabid man-hating feminist manifes…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/16 08:20 AM
1

Sorry, what article was this? Can you give me the link? Edit: Nevermind, found it. You realize that article is bullshit, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 06:22 AM
13

The tattoo guy probably does, because he looks like someone who has very low standards. It's not all about how many women you can bang. It is when you're a stupid teenager, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 06:21 AM
1

Right, that's totally not being an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 05:32 AM
1

I love how all you rp guys always answer these questions without actually answering the question. Is it, or is it not, to make your partner "dread" you leaving her?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/16 12:00 AM
1

Then what is this "dread game" bullshit all about? Because it seems to me to be about tearing down your mate to the point where she's afraid you'll leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 11:18 PM
0

Somehow I think if I were to go through your comment history, there would be examples of you saying that also. Regardless, this is what you want to be then, a male whore? This is what you desire?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 07:37 PM
1

What would you call a woman, who has sex with hundreds of men, or at least the ones she wants, however she wants it, whenever she wants it, and how quickly she wants it? Is there a name for that kind of woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 07:24 PM
1

What do you call a woman, when she does the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 06:52 PM
1

This "alpha male" shit is a myth.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 03:32 PM
1

Looking good doesn't automatically get you women either, although it helps to open the door, for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/16 03:10 PM
1

Being an asshole doesn't automatically get you women. Treating women like shit only drives them away from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/16 01:29 PM
1

It's about treating women like shit because TRP is filled with losers who think only "assholes' get the chicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/16 05:01 AM
2

It's because when you treat people like shit, they generally tend to not like you in the long run. You high school and college kids don't know this stuff, because you've never had a relationship that's lasted more than a few years anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/16 04:14 AM
1

Adding more words to it didn't make it any less nope. Try again? On second thought, don't. You know, the sooner you accept these things about yourself, the better off you'll be.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 03:28 PM
1

Please. That's exactly what it fucking is, and that's exactly why we get such woman-hating, anti-female bullshit coming out of the red pill - TRP is filled with a bunch of socially inept losers who can't get any, and instead of taking on any self improvement or self reflection beyond lifting heavy pieces of metal in a gym, they blame their own inadequacies on women. That's why there's so much bullshit in TRP about "women shouldn't vote," or "Women are children," or "women are losers and can't ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 03:15 PM
1

Lie to yourself, but don't lie to me son.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 11:14 PM
1

More likely you're blaming women who get jobs for the fact that you can't get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 06:12 PM
1

Well, don't bitch and moan that women don't become soldiers then, if you don't actually want women to become soldiers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:28 PM
1

Just don't pretend to me then that when you regurgitate to me the lack of women in stem fields myth, that it's due to some kind of inherent biological weakness in females, or that the greater society doesn't have an influence on what career paths are available to women, or that TRP is just a sexual strategy and/or gives a shit beyond women staying home so they can make sandwiches and distribute blowjobs. You can't complain that these people aren't your equal yet actively keep them down at the sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:00 PM
1

Actually what I was arguing is that societal influences from other women (and men such as redpillers, social conservatives, etc) pressure women into not going into these fields. You can see it by how such men react.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 09:02 PM
1

I'm not sure how attacking feminisim (which no one was talking about) is supposed to address the negative societal influences expoused by redpillers and others that affect women who enter stem or military fields.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 07:31 PM
3

Women do what men say, even in today's feminist age. Kinda like if there was this like, patriarchy underlying our society, driving our social norms and such. I don't really go for that bullshit myself, but you make a good case for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 07:16 PM
0

There are hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of female doctors, scientists, etc. True they are outnumbered by men, but that says more about societal pressures than anything. What kind of societial pressures? This comment by u/archwinger demonstrates them pretty good
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 06:26 PM
0

Well, here's a good example of what TRP thinks about women in combat. Or female scientists, and inventors. If you want more women to be scientists, inventors, or soldiers, you should encourage them to do so instead of complaining when they do enter these fields, and bitching about how they should be making you sandwiches.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 03:35 PM
0

Maybe it's because every time you see a female scientist or soldier the Redpillers shit all over her. Remember when the army floated the idea that women should also be drafted? TRP didn't take too kindly to that notion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 03:18 PM
1

You can say that a law forcing you to wear a seat belt is "tyranny," and strips you of your personal liberty. Besides, who cares if you die in a car accident? It's a risk you're willing to take. Then you see that 33,000 die per year in this country from auto accidents, and that wearing a seat belt greatly increases your chances of surviving such an accident. So when politicians and policy makers craft laws, they aren't thinking about you, and only you. They're thinking about everybody and how su…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 03:13 PM
1

25 days later? What, were you in prison or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/16 05:45 AM
1

No wonder you people are so fucked up. Do you all really need a guide to be "normal?" Good fucking god. Edit: The correct thing to do is to do what you want, act how you want, like the things you like, and if people don't like it, tell them to fuck off. Find other people who like the things you like and hang out with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 04:37 AM
1

Read it again please.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/16 12:45 AM
1

No, I claimed the methods already stated cover your objections, and that fact that you think your horseshit argument is a slam dunk tells me you have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. Not only that, but it's been like 7 days and you haven't researched anything. I have no further response than to tell you to re-read what I've already posted, because you're posting the exact same shit, over and over again, but re-worded in a different way, hoping that somehow makes it correct. You don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/16 03:08 PM
1

Remember when I said I just have to quote myself going forward? I'm not just saying that. Everything you just wrote is something I've already explained to you, multiple times.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/16 10:08 PM
1

Of course the response rate varied. And what does that mean? Use your words. That's just typical featherbedding. No, that is what every study does. It's part of good science. What, in your opinion, is my narrative? You seem to not believe it when people say they're raped but don't report it, and are going to ridiculous lengths to insist your argument has legs, when it doesn't. Like I said, we can explain the inflated rape reports without assuming that schizophrenia played a role. Although that b…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/16 03:07 PM
1

Did you not read what I wrote, in the comment right in front of this? You're trying so hard to find fault with the entire concept of such studies, that you're completely ignoring everything that doesn't fit your narrative. Did you read up on survey weights like I told you to? So, along the lines I pointed out, the study's results amplified the incidence of rape because their methodology wasn't good enough to capture the non-victims in proportion to their numbers in the population. No, they're sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/16 05:30 AM
1

Wrong again. 100,000 people are polled, only 4000 people respond. So in reality you're seeing the reports of 900 schizophrenics out of a population of 100,000. Nope. Only the 4000 people are the actual sample size, that's why they're called respondents. The people who do not answer are not factored into the survey in any way. You would never get that many schizophrenics in even a sample of 100,000. That would never happen in real life. This is a bullshit scenario, and demonstrates more than anyt…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/16 04:57 PM
1

In any properly statistical (or scientific) study the researchers themselves will explain possible faults in their own methodology. Here they are explaining that it could be possible that their conclusions could be skewed by non-response bias. It doesn't say the study absolutely was skewed by this bias. Read it yourself. The non-response bias analysis starts on page A4-1. But you'll please notice, this "non-response bias." That is, it's not "all-the-evil-wimmin-femanazis-could-be-fibbin'-bias." …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/16 04:54 PM
1

That's millions of women in North America, though. But it's still within the margin or error. Let's say a survey asks 100,000 adult women to fill a rape questionnaire. Let's say 4,000 women respond. Of these, let's say 100 are real rape victims and 900 are never-been-raped-in-real-life schizophrenic women with rape delusions, eager to express themselves. More with teh "they're could be lying" bullshit. This scenario is absolutely ridiculous. 900 people out of 4000 surveyed have a mental disorder…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/16 05:43 AM
1

Have you read any of my previous posts in full? You're still talking about respondents lying on surveys as if that's a valid argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 09:43 PM
19

So basically, a prostitute.
/r/ExRedPill10/06/16 03:09 PM
16

So basically, he was beta buxs for her? It's just funny, seeing how they demonize "betas" so much.
/r/ExRedPill10/06/16 02:59 PM
1

But the fact is that the story of the participant who claims to have been raped is the sole data point. You claim the methodology "reduces instances of deception to an acceptable level". How can you know that you haven't been deceived? Because you take an adequate sample. If you sample five people, then one of them lying throws off your results. Often in surveys numbers like this will be annotated with something that says "insufficient sample size." If your sample size is large enough then chanc…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 04:54 AM
3

Damn, this is funny. I'm going to steal the JRPG line for future use.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 06:03 PM
1

We're at the point in the conversation where all I have to do is quote myself to show you're wrong. I'm sorry son, but "because they could all be lying" is simply not an adequate objection. Like I've said multiple times now, the methodology reduces instances of deception to an acceptable level - remember when I explained the margin of error, and confidence levels? Did you spend any of the last 48 hours reading about any of these things? I'll read it only if you give a cogent reason to I don't gi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 05:41 PM
1

Couldn't unscamble the link huh? I know you can do it. Just try real, real, REAL hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 05:32 PM
1

This is why social science fails where real science succeeds Bullshit, but who am I to dispute your religious views? You claim the cleaning is reliable, and faithfully preserves the accurate while eliminating the fanciful. As a rational person, your claim strikes me as laughable. There is literally nothing persuasive in it. Tell me why you think it's unreliable, then. I gave you a high level overview of the process, what cleaning rules do, control questions, sample sizes, statistical analysis, e…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 03:30 PM
1

I'm familiar with the process because this is what I do for a living (among other things). But no, don't just take my word for it. Look up "Survey cleaning rules" and go from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 11:14 PM
7

This thing you're doing, it's called "denial."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/16 04:59 AM
1

Two things: show me where in the methodology of the surveys it's said they interrogated the subjects to catch them in a lie. You claim that's what they do, now back up the claim. That's not what they do. If you want to know what they actually do, please read the comment where I explain it, which was the exact comment you responded to. It takes hours of careful questioning to catch a liar in an inconsistency. To get a reasonable sample size you need to multiply that at least a thousand times. No,…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 07:39 PM
1

You seem to be the one chomping at the bit here, especially about that "heterosexual relationships" part.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 01:38 PM
1

That is what this stupid ass book is about. and I have no interest in Nobody made you respond to me. Feel free to take your opinions elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 01:32 PM
1

All these other things you're referring to have independent corroborating hard evidence. Sanders? The primary election will give us hard corroborating evidence in each state. American adults aged 14-49 only know they have herpes because of a lab test result. That test is hard corroborating evidence of a diagnosis of herpes. Wrong. You cannot test every single adult ages 14-49 for herpes. You cannot ask every single person of voting age which politician they prefer. It's simply not possible. You …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 01:30 PM
1

Find me a control question and cleaning rule that will remove a person who makes an untrue claim of rape to a surveyor. It would be questions that if answered in such a way that they contradict each other, then invalidates the survey. For example, a question which the respondent answers they were sexually assaulted while at work, then another one which determines they were unemployed during the specified timeframe. Thus, that survey is tossed out. Now, does it eliminate all instances of people l…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 01:20 PM
1

Wrong. There is no statistical formula or other method that will prove that speakers are not making untrue statements. People can say things that aren't true on surveys and there is nothing that the surveyors can do to detect it. Most of that is weeded out using control questions and cleaning rules. But like I said, do you then simply not believe any poll or study? Why should you believe any of it then, if people have the ability to lie? Is it all bullshit? What possible reason would someone tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 07:19 AM
1

You misunderstand the meaning of hard evidence. It's video of the rape happening. A person claiming they saw a murder is not hard evidence. The killer's DNA found on the body is. Fingerprints on a murder weapon are. A statistical study done on a sufficient sample with correctly worded, unbiased questions and applied formulas is also hard evidence. If you can find fault with the way the study is done, that is with the methodology, cleaning rules, etc. then that's a different story. But simply dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 07:08 AM
1

I have no reason to conclude it is a truth or an untruth. Either extreme isn't justified in the light of such weak evidence. If the survey is properly crafted, the sample is sufficient, and the correct statistical formulas are applied, etc. then such evidence is not "weak." People who say they were kidnapped by aliens aren't lying, meaning they aren't knowingly telling an untruth. Their memory is telling them something that didn't happen in real life. It happens quite a lot. Human memory is an i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 06:51 AM
1

I'm also correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 06:21 AM
1

That is essentially what this lady talks about in The Surrendered Wife - handing over finances to the man because men are somehow better at them, and doing so "creates trust" or some such bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 04:16 AM
1

We were talking about women being genetically predisposed to not being able to handle money - at least that's what these red pill assholes take it as. I'll be glad to prove that shit wrong any day of the week.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 02:54 AM
2

Sound more like you're trying to backpedal because you got your ass handed to you on a silver platter with all the trimmings.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 02:34 AM
1

No, TV often has actual footage proving that the thing that was claimed did actually happen. Statistical data collected by well constructed surveys is also evidence. Now you can scrutinize how the survey was constructed and find fault it it, and you can attempt to interpret the findings in different ways, but claiming that this data is not evidence because of it's very nature is simply false. They are if they are used in a non-scientific manner. The pseudoscience happens when you take a collecti…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/16 02:25 AM
1

This is what you said: It has worked for most human relationships in history. So quit your bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 07:51 PM
1

This is not people making things up. This is data gathered from survey of a sufficient sample of a population, the results of which can then be reasonably extrapolated to the entire population, within a certain percentage of certainty. Finally, a woman who doesn't report a rape to the police just has a claim. Therefore it cannot be trusted. People can (and do) lie on surveys, but you have to ask what motive would there be? If that's your problem, then you should discount every survey, about ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 04:12 PM
1

Are you seriously holding up the US as an example? With its 60%+ divorce rate? You do understand that you just undercut your own argument? I am not even sure you understood what the OP was trying to say. What does the divorce rate have to do with women controlling the finances in a relationship? Yes, I don't understand how I undercut my own argument. Even though there is a fifty (not sixty) percent divorce rate in the country, the rate of divorce is more predictable depending on socioeconomic fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 04:02 PM
1

Really? What controls? Please answer that question. I do not accept there are any controls until I see them. Well these studies are essentially surveys, correct? So there are control questions placed into the surveys to catch people who are making things up, placed in such a way as to not be obvious. There are many different methods of structuring these questions, but usually they're made in such a way that if one contradicts the other, then that survey is deemed not valid. For example, a questi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 03:39 PM
1

Claiming estimates of unreported rape is all unfounded guesswork doesn't use critical thinking and isn't very objective. Sureveys like this have controls for this kind of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 10:03 PM
2

There is a big difference between claiming a guy raped you and an alien raped you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 07:22 PM
2

It has worked for most human relationships in history. Do you have any proof of that? Because that's a very wide claim, to say that throughout all of human history, the man has always been in charge of household finances. Is that just like the western world, or is it every single society and culture on Earth? Because there are plenty of traditional cultures out there where the exact opposite is true. In the Hopi culture, women were actually the "superior" sex, and were dominant in the economic a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 03:43 PM
2

Unreported rape cases are based on reports. The question usually goes something like "Have you been raped or sexually assaulted and have not reported it within the last xxx years?" With that data in hand, calculations are done to estimate how many unreported rape cases there may be. So yes, it is an estimate, but it's not a guess somebody just pulled out of their ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 03:23 PM
2

That doesn't make it not bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 03:04 PM
2

Well, that's what the book "The surrendered wife" tries to tell us.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 02:43 AM
4

What the fuck are you talking about? Gay people can't handle money now?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 02:18 AM
4

We've already figured it out. The "women can't handle money" thing is a horseshit stereotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 02:18 AM
2

Well, you're arguing to me that women shouldn't be allowed to marry because they're genetically predisposed to not handling money well. So maybe the only response to something so bugnut insane is an argument equally ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 02:40 PM
2

What if we passed a law saying people named Squidracer weren't allowed to get married? Would you think that's fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 02:26 PM
21

What if two women get married? Are they just screwed because they're genetically predisposed to not handling money well? This whole thing is such bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 06:01 AM
1

That's irrelevant. I shouldn't get child support money if I'm not a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 05:54 AM
1

If you're an adult, then you should be responsible for taking care of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 05:03 AM
1

No, but I don't think adult children should get money. I don't think the money is "owed" to them. It was supposed to be used to support them, as children. If they're adults, then they don't need the support anymore, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 04:06 AM
1

I don't think hate-speech laws should exist personally, I think TRP is retarded and largely the result of bitterness rather than a well developed and supported set of ideas, but I don't believe it has had or will have a major effect on society. I think it and the wider MRA movement are having a growing influence on society, and their ideas need to be criticized. And when they post shit saying women are inferior and shouldn't be allowed to vote, they need to be countered. If you come off the inte…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 02:37 PM
1

Yes, there are shitty people out there, including women. It's how you deal with them that determines your emotional maturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 02:24 PM
1

If it became law I would be very concerned, because of the danger of further abuse effecting others. Well, there you go. We are also people who are very concerned about hate speech and bigotry, because of the danger of further abuse effecting others. It doesn't suddenly become different because it's focused on women. The thing is, TRP is a tiny movement, confined to the internet where it has basically zero influence on wider society, Sorry but that's bullshit. It's part of the wider MRA movement…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 02:19 PM
1

What if you saw the same people who abused you doing the same to others, or trying to pass a law to make such abuse normalized? Would you "grow the fuck up and move on" then? Because it's not just a bunch of Yahoos sucking each other's racist dicks and keeping it in the privacy of their own homes. Places like TBP exist to counter vile speech such as this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 02:07 PM
2

I can see that racism and bigotry isn't something you've had to deal with in your everyday life. I'm sure you would feel differently if it was something that affected you personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 01:56 PM
8

Nazis and white supremacists say a lot of nasty things in addition to being for genocide and slavery. It's the inequality and hate rhetoric which makes the two movements comparable. I also think it's no suprise there's a bit of overlap between redpillers and white supremacists/racists.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 10:38 PM
17

The comparison isn't so hard, when you look and see what exactly these people are saying. If it were simply about getting laid, there wouldn't be so many posts about how men are superior to women, or that women are children, or that women shouldn't vote. Here's a few good ones: She can never be your equal - plenty of "women are immature children, men are superior to women, and men need to be in charge of them" shit in there. Women shouldn't vote: Here Here - Also calls women "backwards retards, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 06:29 PM
12

It's kinda like being rude and snide to the Klu Klux Klan, or skinheads. Sometimes people deserve to be called out on their hate in a rude way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/16 06:07 PM
1

They're akin to the kids who got bullied by redpill types in high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 01:17 PM
5

You're wrong. In addition to making fun of redpillers we also treat women as equal human beings.Someone like Roger who hates women and blames them for the fact he's a loser and can't get any would also not fit the bill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 01:11 PM
1

Exactly why not, though I wouldn't say the child has a right to the money. I would not agree that missed child support payments should then be "owed" to the adult child, like some kind of mortgage or loan. The payments are supposed to support them, as they are growing up. But that doesn't mean they should have a right to the money as adults. It's not a pay-off to substitute for non-parenting. When your child turns 18 or whatever legal adult age is in the country, the parent's financial obligatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 03:59 PM
1

Yeah that's not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 04:49 AM
1

The point of child support is to support the child, correct? So if the child is no longer a child, but an adult, then I don't see how they should get that money. I colud see suing the parent for past owed child support, if a court first ordered said payments.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 07:37 PM
1

Then no, they should not have to pay if the child is now an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 07:15 PM
1

Not sure if I'm qualified to answer that question. I agree that a case could be made for that, but I dont know in what form such compensation should come. Maybe if there were a court order to pay child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 05:19 PM
2

No, but women who walk out on thier families and leave the kids with the man should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 07:43 PM
7

No. Parents should have to pay for their child, regardless if they like it or not. Women who make more money but don't get custody should have to pay child support just like a man does.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/16 06:22 AM
3

Well, that's what you say they are. But the consensus seems to be different, when we speak about them in the context of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 05:31 PM
1

I don't think that's what people associate "nice guy" with in a relationship-context anymore. I would describe a guy like that as "amicable," but it depends on how far they allow themselves to be pushed. To be honest, that describes me a bit, non-confrontational. I do it on purpose because I find that whenever I allow a situation to escalate, it usually ends up worse for all parties involved. For example, some guy cuts in front of me in line at the movies. Some people I know would instantly turn…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 03:16 PM
2

It does seem like the meaning of "nice guy" has changed in recent years. When I was growing up, it meant someone who was like a "gentlemen," the guy who won't stoop to someone's level, who only fought when it was absolutely necessary, tries to take the moral high-ground, etc. Seems like now it means being a little man-baby and crying that girls don't want to have sex with you just because you bought them lunch one time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 03:04 PM
0

Jesus christ... there is no blue pill. When will you people understand this?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/16 02:37 PM
1

Just because you say my argument is retarded doesn't make it retarded. Which set is more general - people or gay people? Exactly people. Every gay is a human, but not every human is gay. Therefore, gay people is a subset of people. Now what you are asking for is not equality but special treatment. Don't you see it? People were never able to marry people of the same sex. Everyone was equal in this regard. It's not retarded just because I say so, rather I'm describing it as retarded because that's…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/16 05:48 PM
1

LoL response 21 days later. What, were you in prison or something? If you want to continue, I'm game. They weren't disallowed something that others were allowed. NO MAN, straight or gay, was allowed to marry another man. Equality. The inequality part comes from the sexual orientation of the man. It is not "Men cannot marry other men." It's "Gay people cannot marry other gay people." Preventing gay people from marrying other gay people is discrimination by definition. Your argument is retarded. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/16 05:20 AM
1

It says it in deceptively tiny text between two large walls of text, yes. It does not have easy to follow rules laid out like PPD in the sidebar. It looks to me like the text is large and bold. It even says "USE NP LINKS." Maybe you need glasses. Okay, which mod? They have 64 mods with no central leader, and few agree on policy. I don't know. Pick one. Message him, ask if brigaging is okay. See what he says. This shit is not rocket science. Who is it that you say is discouraging brigading? The s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/16 02:04 AM
3

But I don't have problems with women thank you, I have a question and would like to see others responses that's worked well Lie to yourself, but don't lie to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/16 01:59 AM
8

Well that's the most selfish, entitled, arrogant thing I've ever read. If you're wondering why you're having problems with women, look no further.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 10:09 PM
2

Sorry to burst your bubble, but neither having a job nor having a relationship with anyone is not a right, including women. You have no right to expect any type of treatment from anyone. You are entitled to nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 07:32 PM
6

Have you considered the idea that you might be the one with the problem? Maybe women treat you with contempt because this redpill bullshit makes you come off like a complete asshole? Because if you can't find one woman you respect, then there is a very distinct possibility that might be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 07:24 PM
1

It does say not to do it in the sidebar, correct? If thats not enough for you, you could go ask a mod if they discourage brigading. I'm sure they'll help you with any questions you might have.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 07:19 PM
1

No, tbp does discourage this behavior. That doesn't mean that it doesn't happen, of course. But that's different than saying the sub actively brigades, or turns a blind eye to brigading.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 06:07 PM
1

It's not one sub brigading another if the first sub tells people not to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 04:17 PM
13

You can do all of that stuff you described without the belief that women are only holes for you to fuck and hands to make you a sandwich.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 03:22 PM
1

TBP doesn't brigade shit. It's like a one-sided rivalry between TRP and TBP. Kinda like how Northern California hates Southern California, and Southern California doesn't even know Northern California exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 05:56 AM
2

This is the most ridiculous, backwards load of crap I've ever read. If you guys ever wondered why people think TRP is a hate movement, here it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 03:44 PM
1

Yeah, I meant never witnessed it lately. Bullshit, but okay. Also, not allowing them to marry wasn't discrimination. Straight men weren't allowed to marry other men too. Everyone was equal in this regard - all men were allowed to marry women, and all women were allowed to marry men. That's a crock of shit. It is the very definition of discrimination, to disallow one group of people from partaking in an activity but then to allow another group of people. Don't tell me it isn't, because it is. Peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 02:28 AM
1

They don't have a right to discriminate (except in North Carolina, apparently.)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 02:17 AM
1

You said you "never witnessed it," correct? Gay people only got the right to marry nationwide last October, correct? Gay people were only allowed to serve openly in the military since 2011. So unless you're only like five months old, then yes, you have witnessed it. Shit, gay people weren't even allowed to be Boy Scout troop leaders until July of 2015. Don't tell me you've never witnessed anti-gay discrimination, because it's happening all around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 02:06 AM
1

No, I don't. Never witnessed it, never saw any laws that won't let gays do anything straights can do You must be too young to remember when gays couldn't get married, or serve in the military. Or even like, engage in consensual sex with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 07:52 PM
4

He was one step away from going up on a water tower with a sniper rifle a few months ago. Glad to see he's starting to work out these problems.
/r/ExRedPill27/03/16 07:44 AM
6

So you're an ex-redpill now Xemnas? I'm definitely glad to hear it.
/r/ExRedPill26/03/16 02:39 PM
1

I didn't deny that athletes get chicks. I simply don't believe it when people in this thread tell me they've bedded 50+ women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 05:09 AM
1

Like I said, it's the attitude that goes with people who are in that position, not the position itself. But like I said when I asked you if you'd ever been on the starting line up of a team, you made it abundantly clear that you've never been in that situation, lol. You have absolutely no idea what it's like to be in that position, and honestly, it's kinda sad. True, I've never been captain of the football team or whatever, but I do have some experience being desired by more than one woman at a …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 03:42 AM
2

It failed to pull out of your mom last night.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:29 PM
1

So all it takes it to play football, in a team at any of those levels, and you'll have sex with 50 plus women? That's it, huh? Sorry, but just because you play football doesn't mean suddenly your some kind of love-master. The rest of this conversation is moot. I said I believe somebody like Kobe Bryant or Labron James are capable of getting that many women. I don't believe Joe Blow the quarterback of the minor league team "The fighting Beavers" is likely of the same. I especially don't think any…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:27 PM
1

Well, you said starting line up for a sports team, correct? I admit it is quite probable that such people have lots of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 10:50 PM
1

Look, if you can demonstrate that one of the guys in here claiming to have slept with 50+ women is a former or current NFL or NBA player, then I'll belive it, but for him only. The rest of the guys are still bullshitting until they can prove they're professional athletes also.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 10:45 PM
2

I know you fuckers are lying when you tell me you're 29 and have slept with 80+ women. I have a penis as well. You're not fooling anybody.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 10:33 PM
1

Why, are football players and shit posting in the red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 10:31 PM
2

Nah I'm not sheltered. I just know bullshit when I see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 08:35 PM
-1

The reality is you people are exaggerating.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 07:41 PM
2

Lie to yourself, but don't lie to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 07:19 PM
0

None of this conforms to reality, that's why I call bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 07:13 PM
1

If you really think the claims of guys banging 50 or 60 women in here are truthful, then I got a bridge to sell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 07:12 PM
2

So much bullshit in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 03:12 PM
1

I don't know, what am I, the fucking love doctor? Approach them however the hell you can. The point is if you never do it, then you'll never get anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 07:39 PM
1

It's always been this way. People didn't just suddenly start banging each ohther with reckless abandon in the last 10 years or so. This idea that people were somehow less reserved or more "civilized" when the comes to sex or relationships is a myth. People have been fucking since time immemorial. But nobody said it had to be all about meaningless sex. The question was about meeting women. Well, you have an app to hlep you with that. That doesn't mean you're only allowed to have meaningless sex w…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 07:36 PM
0

All I know is that if I would have had a cellphone app that not only told me who in the place was single, but also was was willing to hook up, I would have had a lot less lonely nights.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 05:17 PM
-1

It's called "going outside" and "talking to them."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 05:14 PM
1

It's not that hard to find women. Shit, I wish I would have had things like Tinder or whatever back in the day. Kids today, you don't know how good you have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 05:06 AM
1

Well, the country with the highest IQ is currently Switzerland. Is that because of the large amounts of Jews and "northern Asians" (wtf does that even mean?) who live there? Or could it be, that Switzerland has a stellar educational system, a stable economy, and a culture that prioritizes learning, and a government which provides it free to it's people? Oh and Jews suddenly are a race, I am talking about populations. Anyways disprove that they have a higher iq and try do do it without saying "I …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 04:46 PM
1

Yes, exactly - you're make value judgements about people based on their race. The white supremacists are saying the exact same thing. I'm part white, part Asian. Can you predict what my IQ should be? No you can't, and you know why? Because the whole thing is horseshit pseduo-science made up buy losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 04:13 PM
1

Looks like other people have answered this as well as I could have. race realism is not a "hate group", 1. because its not a group and 2. because theres no "hate", 3. because its descriptive, not prescriptive. Fine... I will concede that it is not a "hate group," but I will restate my premise and say it is a "hate movement." The fact that you seem to be quoting white supremacists when you attempt to defend it seems to back that up. right, white supremacists routinely ignore dht fact that asians …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 06:19 AM
1

When you and the skinhead are saying essentially the same thing, then yes, you should be judged the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 06:06 AM
3

All I said, is that these "studies" form what passes for the intellectual underpinnings of the white nationalist movement. If you want to debate the findings of such bullshit pseudo-science fakery, then we can have that discussion. But I think it's pretty undeniable that the beliefs of race-realists are essentially identical to normal hate based racists. You asked me why I said it was a hate group. My response is because the people who believe this horseshit and the other horseshit are usually t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 08:12 PM
11

how are race realism and HBD "hate movements". explain It's simply racism under the veneer of pseudo-science. All the exact same claims are made that ordinary, cross-burning type racists make - black people are criminals, Mexicans are lazy, miscegenation leads to birth defects, black people have lower IQs, etc - all backed up with the same horseshit phony baloney studies, without an ounce of truth to any of it. The only difference is that race-realists try to claim they're not a hate movement be…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 06:57 PM
8

Yeah. You're confirming TRP is essentially born out of a hate movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 06:47 PM
5

Well, at least you admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 05:51 PM
5

I don't see why this is such a big surprise. It stands to reason that misogynistic social conservatives would also have corresponding views on race and racism. It seems like a large portion of Redpillers tend to also be libertarians and conspiracy theorists. Let's also not forget that "dark triad" bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/16 05:48 PM
17

More confirmation that racism and bigotry is part-and-parcel with Redpill misogyny. Why am I not surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 05:43 AM
1

That's not exactly true. This idea of politics being hyperpartisan is somewhat new to the American political experience. It has been the case that in the past, people will switch sides if the politician they're voting for has expressed views that match up with their own. Usually, when people don't like the candidate their adopted party has selected, they simply won't vote at all. It's only in the last 40 years or so, since Reagan removed the Fairness Doctrine that right wing media has taken cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 03:00 PM
1

What the fuck are you talking about? The comment is about illegal immigration, but you respond about some shit that Obama said about the wage gap. How the hell are those two things related? It's misinformation is what it is, because he said it as if women are trying to earn the same amount of money, but they are failing to. You know this, men doing math have proven it false. Even controlling for women who fail to negotiate or work extra hours, there is still a gap. You still haven't told me how …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 05:42 AM
0

They had the option of voting for these positions. They could have voted for someone who isn't Republican. But they didn't do that, instead they chose to throw their support behind a racist piece of crap conman who makes shit up and makes promises he has zero intention of following through on. Because they're fucking morons.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 05:14 AM
1

The wage gap, as Obama expressed it, is true. You may disagree with the reasons it exists, but it does. Please explain what the wage gap has to do with illegal immigration. Please explain what Obama quoting the wage gap has to do with Trump's claims to build a giant cartoon wall and make Mexico pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 05:09 AM
-2

Please give me an example of one of these stats you claim are false that Obama quoted. Because if you're referring to the fact that he's deported more than any other president in the history of the country, or that more illegals left the country last year than came in, then you are very misinformed. Edit: Please also tell me what anything Obama said has to do with Trump's claims to build a giant cartoon wall and make Mexico pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 04:42 AM
-2

Bullshit, it does matter. His "proposal" is an idiotic pie-in-the-sky fantasy stated solely to make the stupid-ass redneck racist bastards cum in their pants as they pull the lever for him. He has zero intention of doing jack shit after getting elected. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. That's why I call Trump supporters stupid, because they're being used.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 04:40 AM
-1

They vote for him, because they're hateful racist pieces of shit? Tell us something we don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 04:37 AM
-3

How about his claim to build a giant wall along the Southern border, and to make Mexico pay for it. Quite possibly the stupidest shit any politician has ever said, ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 03:04 AM
0

Except in real life it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 03:02 AM
-6

People vote for Donald Trump because they're fucking morons.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 01:51 AM
0

None of that shit will change a girl's mind and make her like you. What it will do, is make you look like a phony, and make a person you're already in a relationship with start to resent you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 01:50 AM
-3

No there isn't. Everything else RP says beyond this is bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 09:41 PM
1

TBP provides plenty of value, for belittling the stupid necrotic toxic horseshit that spews out of the Red Pill. Those people need to be mocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 01:50 AM
1

I believe I answered "no" to that question.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 02:00 AM
2

Women like it when attractive men give them attention. The same way you would like it if an attractive woman ever gave you attention. Why the hell is this so hard to understand? 1.)Is High SMV Girl justified in treating Low SMV Guy and High SMV Guy differently because she is only attracted to High SMV Guys? Yes, this is true. Are you justified in treating ugly women differently because you're not attracted to them if they hit on you? Yes you are. 2.)Is Low SMV Guy justified in feeling angry? Onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 04:25 PM
1

It's irrelevant if you think the law is moral or not, it still applies to you. You'll still be punished, even if you break the law as an act of protest. If you don't like it, then work through the democratic process to change it. Else you're no better than those morons who took over that wildlife sanctuary.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 04:39 AM
0

I married a woman like this. So yeah. Edit: Except she is much better looking than a "5." God damn I hate that stupid rating bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 04:36 AM
1

Sorry but that's simply not true. The government does have a right to impose their will - it's called "enforcing the law." The law applies to you, whether you like it or not, and whether you agree with the law or not. Businesses also have the right to hold authority over their employees, as long as that authority is exorcised within the law. My big issue is when things are mandated by government law. This tramples upon the minority and doesn't give them breathing room to withdraw from society's …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/16 04:11 AM
1

The problem then becomes, what authority do you have to hold anyone accountable for anything? Just because you, yourself, personally, think that what someone else does is wrong or criminal, that doesn't automatically make it so. What makes you think you're the "rightful minority" in this case? What is it exactly about being that minority that gives you the right to enforce your will on others? See, if we were to vet these laws through the democratic process, then even if the law that results isn…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 04:29 PM
1

I'm going to have to disagree with this right here: In some cases, the rightful minority should rule the majority with an iron fist. Right makes right, not majority. I'm all for educating the masses and fighting to end rape. But whatever laws are passed are going to have to go through the democratic process, just like everything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 06:20 AM
2

In short, no. The "elites" did not create identity politics. Who exactly are these "elites" anyway? Nobody seems capable of answering that question.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 04:31 PM
1

I don't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 04:38 PM
1

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 04:30 PM
1

The pill is not making them attracted to you. The reason why they look like you, is because you have things in common with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 02:45 AM
3

I'm fucking interracial, you raging bucket of retard. Should my parents go to prison for having me? Fuck your perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 02:11 AM
2

Yet more confirmation of the nasty racist undercurrent present in Red Pill thought. Anybody copy it before he removed it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 04:26 PM
1

Someone sounds a little butthurt. Seriously though, read what you just wrote. You are in need of therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:39 PM
1

Because, you know, awalt.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:18 PM
3

The term "red pill" was around for a few years before r/theredpill came around and made it all about "sexual strategy." Before then, it had more to do with libertarian/neo-conservative/conspiracy theory thought. You can still find blogs and youtube channels that use the term in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 04:40 PM
1

It seems you are hell bent on ignoring the fact that it is indeed easier for women to get laid and harder for men on average, that's where these "bullshit double standards" come from when labeling promiscuous behavior of both sexes. I reject the notion that women find it easier to have promiscuous sex. It's only "easier" if they decide to get with low quality men - fat men, ugly men, total douchebags, assholes, losers, drug addicts, etc. Sure, these men will fuck anything that moves. The same wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 03:49 AM
1

First of all you seem to be completely missing the point. The point sounds to me like "It's ok for men to engage in a certain behavior but not ok for women to do the same." The bullshit justification is that it's "difficult" for a man to sleep with lots of women, so he deserves praise for being a whore, while she doesn't. It's total fucking bullshit of the highest caliber. It has nothing to do with it being "easy" for a girl to get men, it has to do with mysoginist assholes - that is, men - piss…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 06:14 PM
1

You can't repeal taxes through the government because the government is funded by taxes. Yes, you can. Taxes are cut or repealed all the time. Now if you want to eliminate ALL taxes everywhere because your economic religion says they're evil, good luck with that. But don't try to claim it's impossible or that it never happens, because it does. I agree, I'm not suggesting that it's actually tyrannical - that's just the popular term used to describe these kinds of policies. If you don't agree with…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 04:41 PM
2

so because I have a vote, I am suddenly master of my fate? I disagree. Because you have a vote, then you are represented in the law making process. That includes tax law. If you don't like the law, then vote someone in to change it. You can repeal taxes. Can you repeal thievery? I don't think anyone in the western world could honestly say that representative democracy represents their views because politicians can lie, and the tyranny of the majority always closes out the individual vote. That t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 03:47 PM
2

This is 100% grade A pure bullshit of the highest caliber. It is very much exactly the same thing. Men and women like to sleep around with multiple partners for the exact same reasons. The only reason you people think it's bad for a women to do it and A-okay for a man to do it is because you're men. It has nothing to do with "skill," nor the fact that women are the "gatekeepers," or any other stupid shit like that. The only reason is because men want to have lots of sex with lots of people with …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 06:24 AM
2

You go to prison. That is the law which your elected officials passed. The reason why it isn't thievery is because you have (indirect) input in how the tax laws are made.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 06:04 AM
1

And there you go, moral absolutism at work. Taxes are not thievery, btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 08:39 PM
1

I don't care about you. Please see my other reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 04:47 PM
1

Here's the thing - I am interested in what Redpill philosophy does to a person, and it's effects on society. I do not give a fuck about you. This whole time all you've been talking about is yourself - what you think about sexism, how you treat women in your life with "positive discrimination," and so on. Well this sub is not all about you. But here's the thing: You do care what other people think and do, but only when it's about yourself. You've emphasized several times that you do not give a sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 04:46 PM
1

Why are you replying? You said you don't give a shit what other people do, or what happens to other people. Well, let me help you not give a fuck. I said I have all I need from you. You can go away now.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 05:53 AM
1

Uh, yeah? What is so hard to believe about that? I just find it incredibly hypocritical, and intellectually dishonest. It's kinda like saying "I'm a Christian, but I don't give a fuck when priests rape altar boys, because it's not in the bible." But no, I don't find it hard to believe you don't give a fuck about other people. All actions have consequences. All actions have effects on others. I have neither the energy nor the inclination to go around policing random people who may or may not be d…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 03:07 AM
1

So, you don't give a fuck what the people who subscribe to the redpill actually do or say, only what the tenants of redpill are? So the actual real life consequences of those actions, their effects on people, the results those people profess to obtain, or the effect on others, you don't give one single fuck about those? There are so many fallacies here I don't know where to start. Myself, that is exactly what I'm interested in - the practical effects and results of what RP philosophy does to soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 04:17 PM
1

So hypergamy is bullshit? Thanks for the confirmation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 03:54 PM
1

So it doesn't matter what redpillers actually post in the sub? So what the people who profess to believe this shit actually say or do has no actual bearing on your opinion? Who's being intellectually dishonest now?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 11:41 PM
1

First off, Awalt itself is a logical fallacy. No two people will react to the same situation the same way. Secondly, it is most definitely an appeal to emotion. Specifically, it's designed to allow the man to skirt responsibility for his failures in relationships. She cheated on him because she was an evil hypergameous slut with the emotional maturity of an 18 year old, not because he was negging and "holding frame" and trying to fuck - sorry, I mean "plate" - her best friend. AWALT is essential…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 04:34 PM
1

If that were true, there wouldn't be threads in redpill subs to the effect of "Women don't sleep with men because they have too many rights." Here's a good one: Revenge Porn laws only serve to protect women from the consequences of their bad decisions, reminding us once again that women have no agency and should be treated like children. Here's another: Sexbots: Why Women Should Panic Those damn feminists are going to regret it, now that all the betabucks guys are going to be fucking robots inst…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 04:19 PM
1

Because the conversation is about sexism. And sexism involves discrimination, period. That's not what two out of three definitions say. Sexism isn't defined by negative or detrimental discrimination only - the outrage brigade wants to take a reductionist view of sexism so they can make a blanket condemnation of it, so they conveniently only discuss detrimental discrimination when discussing sexism, which totally serves their agenda through intellectual dishonesty and appeals to emotion. No, howe…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 08:01 AM
1

Clearly, you've shown yourself here as nothing more than a bigoted BP troll, so I'm disinclined to spend much time on a reply. Nobody said you had to reply. Women (and everyone else) only get insulted when they lose due to discrimination. Otherwise, they are more than happy to enjoy whatever benefits come with whatever special and benevolent treatment results from discrimination. Discrimination in the context of sexism, as used by the majority of Redpillers, is usually recognized to be negative …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 03:22 AM
3

Do not put up with any of his shit, at all, under no circumstances. Everytime he tries to pull any of it, stop talking, and leave the room. Be prepared to leave him if he gets too retarded. If that happens, be sure to tell him it was this stupid red pill crap that ruined everything.
/r/ExRedPill07/12/15 08:04 AM
3

That is a link to a thread about a guy who says to put a dollar in a jar every time his wife has sex with him, and then use that to buy her christmas gifts. The blue pill people are right to point out and mock such idiocy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 06:44 PM
4

There is no "blue pill" advice, because there is no blue pill. But what I would do is leave. No idiotic red pill manipulation is going to change this girl. "Holding frame," treating her like a child, etc. is only going to make things worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 06:38 PM
1

Your questions are leftist boilerplate petitio principii wrapped in question marks. I reject all of leftist "history" so I don't accept any if your premises to even try to discuss them I.e. you don't have an answer, and you want to make it look like you're "above" the discussion, to save face. That's okay. I like to call this point in an argument the "ignorance horizon," which is that point at which someone who is too vested in a particular ideology is unable to continue a discussion because doi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 04:56 PM
1

Except that the definitions quoted didn't support your assertion, so there's that. I bolded the pertinent information, if you're having trouble spotting it. Um, yeah...where, in any of the shit I just wrote, did I denigrate or insult women? Most people (not just women) get insulted when you discriminate against them. So? The question was one of sexism, not "TRP sexism." Some TRPers fall into the "may include" qualification. Others don't. So it's not sexism that you seem to be having an issue wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 04:28 PM
2

Answer the rest of the questions please, if you can without sounding ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 04:05 PM
2

those are two different things. in your radioactivity example, as long as the radioactivity is kept to your property and doesnt effect others its not a problem, when it gets onto the PRIVATE PROPERTY of others, or their person, it becomes a tort, it intereferes with the right to quiet enjoyment others have in THEIR private property. thats the issue with "contamination of OTHER property", not what i do on my OWN property, but who it effects someones elses. its perfectly legal for me to salt my ow…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 12:35 AM
2

So if you own something, like some land, you should be able to do whatever you want with it? So if you want to like, dump radioactive toxic waste on it, then it shouldn't matter if it gives everyone in your town cancer? Fuck them, it's your land, right? If you own a business, you should be allowed to not hire women and black people simply because you don't like women and black people? Fuck it, this is my hot dog stand, I'll hire whoever the fuck I want to run it for me, correct? If you want to h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 11:51 PM
1

Are you being intentionally daft? I have no idea why you felt the need to throw definitions out that mirror the one I provided, but whatever. Well, you're calming that the lazy ass definition you got from typing "sexism" into google and not clicking anything afterwards doesn't include the "insulting" part, nor was it denigrating towards women, correct? If so, then some further definitions were needed. I believe that each gender has aspects that are instrinsically superior or inferior to the othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 11:44 PM
1

Turn that question around on yourself, and you'll see why TRP doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 11:26 PM
1

No, sexism is defined as "prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex." It has nothing to do with insulting or denigrating women. Well, that's what Google says about it when you search for "sexism" and then don't click on any of the links. Let's see what Merriam-Webster has to say about it: 1) prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially : discrimination against women Let's see what Wikipedia says: Sexism or gender discrimination is prejudice …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 06:09 PM
1

You know what's also effective? Not being a total asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 05:59 PM
2

I don't see much of a distinction, when it comes to hiring people. Just because you own a business (or run it,) doesn't mean you get to do whatever you want with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 05:58 PM
2

I don't see how you come to that conclusion. Just because I believe an employer shouldn't be allowed to discriminate, doesn't mean I think that people shouldn't own Iphones or run businesses.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 03:26 AM
2

Well, I simply do not agree. I think employers - private or otherwise - should not be able to discriminate based on sex, or any other inherent biological reason. I'm not saying this doesn't happen, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 09:43 PM
3

This question is like saying "do you have an alternative to Christianity." Yes, there are lots of alternatives to TRP, but there's no guarantee that anything is going to "work" better, because there is no magic spell that will make women like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 09:41 PM
1

But the main problem you have with what he's saying is that you think it's incorrect. I also think it's incorrect. I don't believe that a 30 year old woman "is still basically an 18 year old as far as her brain is concerned". But we're getting back to my original point, which is that people call sexism when we see negative generalizations that we believe to be incorrect, not just when we see negative generalizations. (By the way, he thinks he's making a rational observation.) I don't call it sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 04:08 PM
1

Seems to me calling it "sexist" is identifying the fallacious reasoning behind the statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 03:55 PM
4

Ethics don't matter huh? So let's say someone wouldn't hire a man, because he/she thinks a man's brain isn't "developed" enough, and that even though he's 35, he still has the maturity of an 18 year old. Because of someone's subjective ethical judgement, this guy doesn't have a job. Would you say "so what?" to that? See your problem is you're confining this discussion to the arena of sexual strategy, when the implications of RP "philosophy" goes far beyond that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 03:54 PM
4

What it comes down to is that people don't call sexism when they see negative stereotypes, they call sexism when they see negative stereotypes that they don't believe to be true. If you'd talk about sexism for the second set of statements but not the first, it just means that you believe that men have a strength advantage but not a rationality advantage. It's when value judgements are made using these stereotypes designed to insult and denigrate, that's where the sexism part comes in. No one wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 05:38 AM
2

That's total bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 05:27 AM
5

In my mind, just taking the risk of hurting somebody isn't morally better than lying. What you're basically saying, is that by hurting someone by accident when trying to give them something positive is the same thing as hurting them intentionally, correct? No, I don't think those two things are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 03:32 PM
-1

As well you shouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/15 02:23 AM
4

I love how seriously people are taking this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/15 06:16 PM
1

It helped me realize TRP is made up bullshit, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 04:06 PM
1

Wow. It's almost like the plot to a TV show. Does he ask the girl out to the prom at the end also?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 03:36 PM
-1

Those things don't tell women to treat their men like dogs, or to "plate" them if they don't drop to their knees on command.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 08:33 AM
1

Define "healthy relationships" in real terms. 50% divorce rate? Losing more than half your life's earnings? Losing your children? Losing your house? Losing your dignity? Emotional anguish? Treating your girlfriend/wife like she's a dog isn't going to change those stats. LOL - yet another strawman... Personally, I'm not into large breasts. Does what she wants cancel out what a man wants? If all you want is sex, and if all you give a shit about is what she looks like and not what she thinks or fee…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/15 02:14 AM
2

It also destroys your life, and any hope you may have to develop or maintain healthy relationships. Why would any man not want to destroy these things? What is in it for men? I know that society and women seem to say they want these things, but what do men want? Does what men want even matter? It has been the long standing, prevailing societal attitude that what men want is not important, even worthy of ridicule If all you want is a girl with big titays and you don't give a shit about who she is…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 08:38 PM
-4

I didn't assume anything. I only said that believing a bunch of horseshit about working out and why women are children doesn't suddenly not make you a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 06:06 PM
3

What you don't get, is that if you're a loser who then starts using TRP, that doesn't turn you into a winner. You're simply a loser who's also an misogynist asshole to boot. And TRP actually makes a good eventual future with women more likely. A future with a fucked up woman who gives you grief that you continuously feel the need to cheat on because your philosophy says to treat her like a child, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:47 PM
0

I agree with all of this. TRP seems to be very self-destructive in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:45 PM
1

It makes it easier to believe things when they're true.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 05:16 PM
1

If, and only if, you find a girl fucked up enough to fall for it. It doesn't seem to be a priority among red pillers to find a woman with a bit of self respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/15 07:55 AM
2

The scientific basis of RP ideology is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 06:52 PM
13

I think you're misusing the term "political crrectness," it's supposed to be about using inoffensive language that doesn't marginalize minority groups. What you're describing is identity politics taken to a pseudo-facist extreme. People need to understand, just because a group identifies with a certain minority that has used such equalizing vehicles in the past does not mean thier behavior defines all future use of such vehicles. To do so then demonizes everyone who then tries to use political c…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 07:23 PM
2

Can you make this any more of a loaded question? I don't "hate" TRP at all, especially because it "works" or otherwise. I personally have not seen it work for relationships of any worth. My problem with it, is that it turns people into shitmongering abusive asshole crybabies, and has the potential to push already unstable individuals over the edge into kill-crazy rampages. But my biggest beef with TRP, is that it's a piss poor excuse for a philosophy. It's like Austrian Economics, or libertarian…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 04:39 PM
1

I tried to be concise. These measures can be summed up under "Trying to restrict or stifle the freedom of expression". So if you want, you can add the caveat (including hindering online communication, character assassination and attempts at permanently disrupting a person's private life), which should sum it up. I doubt the survey would look different. It wasn't a caveat when you said this below, it was a requirement: I dunno, for me "silencing someone" implies that I try to get his forum shut d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 04:34 PM
1

It's because those points are retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 07:32 PM
1

The more of this stupid bullshit I read, the more I fear for the future of humanity. Any woman with a high n-count (inability to properly pair bond) What the fuck is this? What, women are fucking chemical reactions on legs now? Any woman who is unable to obtain an education at your level or higher with a job market value equal or higher than you. (Substantial risk to family long term stability and divorce proceedings) "Hey I really like you and stuff, but you simply don't make enough money for u…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 05:10 PM
1

Its rather curious that you continue to attack me as a person. I again implore you to stay on point. Attacking your argument is not attacking you. Please tell me where I attacked you as a person. What relevance does a relationship from "the Middle east" have to do with relationship dynamics in the west? You could potentially meet someone from the middle east someday. We do have these things called "airplanes" and "ships" and such. People from other places do tend to come to America to like, live…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 02:05 AM
1

Please point out to me where, exactly, I said anything about TRP being morally objectionable, before you brought it up. What you're really doing, is that you lost the argument, so now you're trying to grasp some straw as to why it's "pointless" to continue, so that way your ego can save face. The fact is you can't do it, so you're making shit up. You're never going to grow as a person if you're not intellectually honest with yourself. Edit: and just to provide an example: in our first exchange y…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 04:18 PM
1

If you're angry that your argument has no legs, complaining about it won't do anything. Maybe you should re-examine your argument. Maybe that'll lead to you re-examining Redpill "philosophy" in general, and then maybe you'll see how full of shit it is. Fyi, sidestepping in an argument (aka straw-manning) is when you talk about something that your opponent did not bring up in the first place as a distortion of their position, then objecting to that false position. Kinda like when you said I wante…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 03:42 PM
1

You can't honestly believe the "no critical thought" statement, can you You, yourself, personally, made this exact mistake in the comment right before this one. You are not the only one to do so. TRP is filled with fallacious reasoning, one of those being those "common denominators" you're talking about. Also, it's not a generalization to say that TRP relies on generalizations. Awalt, and all that. You want to make this a moral argument. Sorry. Reality is inherently amoral. Morality is your subj…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 07:51 AM
1

It's a "strategy" that relies on generalizations, yet whose adherents purposely discount information outside of their limited experience. That alone makes it inherently flawed. It doesn't rely on critical thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 05:25 AM
1

And that's why RedPill thought is inherently flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 03:53 AM
1

Replace "men" with "American men" and your statement might have some merit, in the non-conservative areas of our country. In other places- europe, the middle east, South america, etc- it's not like that. In many places in the USA (Utah, the deep south,) it's not like that. The problem with TRP is that it takes what is shown on TV and assumes that's the world. In real life people don't act like what you see in sitcoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 08:44 PM
3

Short answer is no. TRP cherry picks factoids from various studies, along with fictional made-up bullshit to sound "scientific" when in real life it's a load of baloney.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 08:38 PM
-1

Awalt, amirite?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 08:18 PM
1

I would say more conservative men do than liberal women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 05:50 PM
1

I said "closer," not "it is exclusively."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 05:28 AM
1

It doesn't disprove OP, but it does clarify his statement. I didn't say they were mutually exclusive. What I am saying is that conservative women tend to do more of the slut shaming - those women with conservative views on sexuality, religion, etc. Simply saying "women are responsible for most slut shaming" doesn't tell the whole story.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 04:50 AM
14

The problem is because you people frame this as a "male vs female" dynamic, when really this is closer to a "conservative vs liberal" dynamic. Simply put, it's women with conservative values who usually engage in slut shaming
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 08:32 PM
1

Please, I suggest you ask different people (so you get a different pictures) the following: What comes to mind first comes to mind first when I ask you the meaning of the phrase "silencing the opposition"? Shutting someone whose opinion is fundamentally incompatible with the values or the theoretical/ideological/philosophical/etc. platform of a closed group (forum/political party/association/etc.) out of that group or preventing his/her access to it. Trying to restrict or stifle the freedom of e…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 03:53 PM
1

I dunno, for me "silencing someone" implies that I try to get his forum shut down, try to get his account banned, follow him around on reddit and call him out as a feminist/Nazi/terrorist/redpiller/whatever he is every chance I get. What you're doing here is a variation on the Psychologist's fallacy, with a bit of strawmanning on the side. Essentially, you're defining what "silencing" means, then arguing that OP was not silenced, because what you described as silencing didn't happen to him. You …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 03:13 PM
3

It's almost like this Red Pill crap is a bunch of stupid untrue horseshit dreamed up by teenagers or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 08:02 AM
4

You know, when you see women as people, and not simply holes to be fucked, then all of the stupid bullshit you just said flies right out the window. All of human interaction doesn't always boil down to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 03:56 AM
1

But we're not claiming to have super-powers. We are claiming to be getting laid, and guys all over the planet do that every day. It's a whole different level of claim going on here. We are NOT claiming super-natural powers here. Frankly, if anyone is.... It's you.... With your super-natural ability to identify what is false/is true concerning a lifestyle you have never taken part in. Ever. Actually, right now you're claiming that you, and only you, are capable of telling when someone is relaying…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 02:04 PM
1

No, that's what you think from your "Dunning-Kruger" hideout. How would you know ? You've never applied RP. What exactly do you know about how it looks and works in practice ? Fuck all, basically. The same way that I know when a scientologist tells me holding two cans and repeating words over and over gives them super powers. It's obvious bullshit with no basis in fucking reality. "Dunning-Kruger" I am intelligent enough to understand your point. I just think your point is a load of fallacious b…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 01:48 PM
1

It simply is true. So only people who believe in the red pill are capable of determining if a story someone says on the internet is true or not? That is a yardstick RP uses that TBP simply cannot use. Doesn't mean you can't be right independent of that. But in assessing what is an honest representation of how RP works in practice, and what is a lie about how RP works in practice, RP practising guys have an asymmetry of knowledge with TBP posters. That's bullshit. Half the stories I see from RP "…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 03:11 AM
1

TBP does not. And never will have. That is simply not true. Non-redpillers are perfectly capable of distinguishing when someone tells a bullshit story. It just so happens that the majority of RP field reports fall into that category.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 07:48 PM
1

I can say with confidence that the "treat women like they're children" strategy that redpillers seem to get wet over is a bad strategy, and will not result in a relationship of any worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 07:21 PM
1

I think when someone is banned, and they go to another but relater subbreddit to complain, they shouldn't be dismissed out of hand, until it's displayed that they deserved the ban.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 04:53 PM
0

He complains that TRP was silencing opposition and "bolstered" that claim with them not being willing to put up with him and guys like him in their own forum, so the XKCD-comic is right on the money here. If you don't get that, I'd suggest you read it again and again and again until you do. I read the comic, and it said that censorship of freedom of speech is something that only the government can do. However, OP did not claim his free speech rights were being violated, so I don't see how the co…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 03:05 PM
1

Still doesn't change the fact that OP isn't claiming "free speech" as his reason for complaining about being banned. That XKCD comic doesn't apply. You people often claim that TRP doesn't try to change people's minds when it comes to perceived gender biases in society and culture, yet in real life they have no problem shutting people up who don't agree with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 01:57 AM
2

OP didn't say "free speech," he said "silence opposing voices." Vinegarbubblegum's ban from TRP is relevant to the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 07:48 PM
1

This thread is laughably, ridiculously biased, with zero basis in fucking reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 07:44 PM
1

Would we be having this discussion, if it were about men? I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 07:42 PM
1

Thank you for posting a link. Now explain to me, like I'm a five year old, how an affirmative action program at Princeton - which is what this represents, not "bonus" SAT points awarded by race - somehow proves your statement that under qualified women and minorities are given government jobs over qualified white people. Put it together for me, because to me it looks like you're just grabbing anything out there that has to do with affirmative action and saying that's proof. That's stupid, ignora…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 03:39 PM
2

First off, I repeat myself: What the fuck are you talking about? And what the fuck, exactly, is that supposed to prove? How, exactly, does this relate to your dipshit statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 07:28 AM
2

What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 05:37 AM
1

I don't give a fuck what you "think," I only care about what can or cannot be proven. Now please remove your cranium from the inside of your rectum and post some actual fucking evidence. Not what you "think," not an assumption you made, not a study that has nothing to do with your statement. Pretty please. With sugar on top. Prove your fucking point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 09:33 PM
1

What stats? You have stats, which prove the government hires unqualified women and minorities over qualified men? Really? CAN YOU FUCKING POST THOSE PLEASE? God damn, this us like trying to talk to a creationist. Nice dig, calling me a woman. Doesn't change the fact your horseshit argument has no basis in fucking reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 09:33 AM
1

Fuck you, you did not say "Qualified women are hired 2 to 1 over qualified men for stem professorships at universities." You said unqualified women and minorities are purposely hired by the government over qualified men. Kindly post some evidence that backs up what you said, not some bullshit that has nothing to fucking do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 07:14 AM
1

God damn, you finally posted something. I only had to ask nine fucking times. Was that so fucking hard? You'll notice from the title of that study the words "equally qualified." Thus, these are not unqualified women, taking the jobs from qualified men. Additionally your statement was that the government - not private corporations hiring for stem fields - purposely hire unqualified women and minorities instead of qualified men. Your example was the DMV, but policy from any governmental agency wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 06:42 AM
1

You didn't even say anything in that long ass paragraph. You've been, like most BPers, arguing about the semantics of something that'so obviously true. If it's so obviously true like you say, then you shouldn't have much trouble proving it. Since I've asked you nine times to do and you haven't posted one shred of evidence, so it's obvious you can't. Because it's stupid untrue redpill bullshit. You did not answer my question in the slightest. I didn't assert that the patriarchy existed in the fir…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 08:48 PM
1

How am I sexist and racist? This is what you sjw's do, make accusations and hope one of them sticks. Don't remember? It was when you said this: Every Gov't Job in the US. go to your local DMV and tell me Sharonda is the most qualified person for the job. See, not only did you use a woman's name, you used a black woman's name. Not a race-neutral name like Mary or Sue, not a latino name like Maria or Isabella, but you choose a black woman's name. So if you didn't mean to say that black women speci…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 09:45 AM
3

Yes, it is really fair to state that self improvement is obvious advice. If you have nothing to offer, it only makes sense to improve yourself. The problem with TRP is, and always has been, the bigotry, mysoginy, lack of critical thought, and most of all selfishness that frames its philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 08:55 AM
1

Did I state, at any given time, anywhere in this conversation, that the patriarchy existed? Did I? No. And no, proof of your cliam is not kept "on the down low." You said the government purposely hires unqualified women and minorities. Now you're telling me this is a conspiracy of some kind? Get the fuck out of my face with that bullshit. So fuck you, give me proof of your claim. Stop trying to turn it around, and back up your stupid-ass, sexist, racist claim, or keep your blithering mouth shut.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 11:53 PM
1

Then it should be easy for you to find some proof to back up your bullshit claim then. Sixth time asking you this - give me some proof that the government hires unqualified women & minorities, or GTFO.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 10:27 PM
1

Fuck you, this is not about semantics, this is about me asking for actual, physical, tangible proof, which I've asked for five times already, and you stupid bottom feeding douche-pimples being unable to deliver. You know why? Because this dumbass idiotic red pil horseshit has no rational basis in fucking reality. Now give me some proof, or go crawl back under that super Nintendo you came from.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 10:20 AM
1

You are one step away from going up on a water tower and blowing people away with a hunting rifle. You should stop reading this bullshit, and get some help.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:21 PM
1

Fuck you, "you know damn well" is not proof of any kind. I asked you for proof, so far you haven't provided jack shit. You are claiming this stupid sexist racist bullshit, now give me some goddamned proof or shut the fuck up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:17 PM
1

You don't get a lot of things, because you have mental problems. This shit is going to drive you insane. For God's sake stop reading it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 11:12 PM
1

Stop reading TRP. It is wrong. Your parents are only trying to help you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 09:07 PM
1

You really need to get off the internet. Your parents are correct. Stop reading this red pill stuff, for your own sake. The Red Pill is not real. It's not how people interact with each other in real life. Seriously, this is going to end badly for you. Edit: From now on, whenever I see you making fun of "betas" and the like, I'm going to reference this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 09:05 PM
1

I understand that - I am asking you for some proof, any kind of proof at all, that backs up your sexist racist full-of-shit claim. Please provide for me a law, or a memo, or an executive order, or some kind of official policy that says that women and minorities who are not qualified should be given jobs over white men who are. Do you understand that word, "proof?" It means some kind of concrete evidence that demonstrates that what you say is actually true. Not some horseshit you read on a blog s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 08:56 PM
1

You just never get to talk about "beta" males, ever, ever again. Edit: Holy fucking shit, you have some serious problems. Please, for your own sake, please stop reading this Red Pill shit. People with your types of mental problems have trouble discerning between what is fantasy and what is reality. You think this red pill shit is real - it is not. Nothing good will come from it. Your parents are correct, this stuff is bad for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 08:45 PM
2

So wait - you are like the most vocal Red Pill person there is on here, constantly debating people and extolling the virtues of being an Alpha and shit like that, but in real life you live at home with your parents? And your parents can like, take away your computer and stuff? Holy fucking shit.This is the best post ever. So like, did they make you clean up your room and take out the garbage too?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 12:57 PM
1

Since when is working at the DMV a position that requires more than standing at a counter and handing people forms? What, do you need a goddamned masters degree to make people go stand in line B and fill out their address? Are you saying that the DMV only hires black women, because feminism? What, are black people just not intelligent enough to work at the DMV? So what kind of job, exactly, is Sharonda qualified for, in your educated opinion? Also, what proof, exactly do you have that the DMV pu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 12:43 PM
1

Please show me one example of where a company hired a woman who was not qualified over a man who was.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 06:55 PM
0

Please give me an example of a company that engages in preferential hiring of women. Now if you mean they hire the woman, because she's like, more qualified and stuff, then I agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:46 AM
1

No one says TRP doesn't work. I say it doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/15 08:17 PM
1

From other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/15 07:44 PM
0

If you haven't noticed, women are earning more pay, degrees, and scholarships because they are working harder, not because they're complaining. In this regard, feminisim seems to be working rather well, for all of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 12:26 PM
0

God god, that article is completely rediculous. You know who really preassures men to perform? Life.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 10:14 AM
1

TBP is an ideology the same way that atheism is a religion. The only people who think it is are those who it is in their interest to oppose it. If by "Blue pill" you mean people who try to treat women as equal human beings, then r/relationships is what you're looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 10:05 AM
1

So the only reason men act in any manner, is because women reward them with sex for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 03:04 AM
1

It is easy to refute. That's what I've been doing this whole time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 03:41 AM
1

I've spent plenty of time reading about RP philosophy - I just think it's all a bunch of crap made up by teenagers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 02:06 AM
1

Yes it is a cheat code - or rather, Redpillers treat it like a cheat code. If I do this, I will get laid! oh boy oh boy! What Redpillers fail to understand is that changing your outward appearance does not change who you are inside. If you are an ugly, insufferable asshole who only gives a shit about his dick and nothing else, then you go lift a bunch of weights, you'll then be an ugly, insufferable asshole who only gives a shit about his dick and nothing else with big muscles. It is not going t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 03:20 PM
1

I don't see anybody in TRP saying there is a "cheat code" to get women. I see people saying "lift", "lose weight", "build confidence". All of which, even the last one, are a helluva lot easier said than done. All take hard work and constant effort. So who's saying that it's supposed to be easy like a cheat code? Certainly not anyone in TRP. That is the cheat code. It doesn't matter how many heavy pieces of metal you lift over your head. If you're a boring, selfish asshole who only gives a shit a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 03:50 AM
2

Those aren't laws. They are the enumerated powers to which all laws in the nation must conform. Yes, that's right, the second amendment is no longer controlling, the Brady bill "infringed" on the right to bear arms, was allowed to by a Congress and supreme court who no longer followvthe constitution and everything done under the aegis of the constitution since FDR is a cargo cult, all form no constitutional substance. That's complete bullshit. The Brady bill mandated background checks so convict…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/15 12:01 AM
2

Yes, exactly. If the law does not say that government can do something, then it can't. That's not true. Any regulatory power not explicitly granted to Congress in the constitution is forbidden. That's not debatable. And it's why the court system has had to re-interpret Congress's mandates to give them more authority. Sorry, but that is debatable. That's what the debate over the commerce clause is all about. They're unconstitutional because they were created by the federal government Or rather, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 06:42 PM
0

Once again, that is only your opinion. Too bad the thread asked for my opinion, not yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 06:38 PM
0

What "laws" are there in the constitution, hawanja, tell me . The 27 amendments, for starters. The second amendment was abrogated by the Brady Bill So the 2nd amendment is no longer the law of the land? Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 06:38 PM
1

So none of the laws in the Constitution apply anymore then, correct? I suppose Obama can start taking away people's guns then, because there's no more 2nd amendment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 05:50 PM
0

Except the concept of Amused Mastery has no depth to it in the first place, beyond "try to act cool and girls will like you." It's like you people are still following advice your best friend gave you in 7th grade.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 05:49 PM
0

That's not how the constitution was written. Nor is it how law works in general. Just because certain forms of regulation are not explicitly forbidden, does not mean that they are allowed. We're going to have to agree to disagree here. If the law doesn't say an action is a crime, then the state has no legal authority to persecute it as such. The concept is the same - nowhere is it prohibited for the federal government to enact social programs, thus such programs are not unconstitutional through …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 05:47 PM
-1

A rose is but a rose, just as horseshit is just horseshit, if it is as smelly. Or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 05:09 PM
3

How you would go about answering a question is irrelevant, because the title of the thread is "What do blue pillers think Amused Mastery is?" I'm sorry if you can't handle that I think Amused Mastery is a bunch of phony baloney horseshit insecure guys try to enact because they've never really understood what it means to be an adult and don't really understand how relationships work, and are merely concentrating on their outward appearance to attain ultimately non-fulfilling goals (such as ejacul…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 05:08 PM
4

But you didn't say the commerce clause has expanded federal power, you said this: Both are, the constitution was fully abrogated in the FDR era and no one "left" or "right" has anything to do with it anymore Abrogated. As in no longer applies. As in the constitution no longer has the weight of law behind it. As in those who break the laws detailed within are no longer punished. As in it is no longer the highest law of the land. So if you didn't actually mean what you said, then kindly please get…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:55 PM
2

It's kind of like if someone wanted me to engage in a rational discussion of how Santa Claus uses radioactive bananas grown by lizard people in the center of the Earth to shoot down sperm whale projectiles launched from the moon by exiled homosexual Nazis. There should be no rational discussion of such a topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:48 PM
0

Just the fourth time you've failed to realize the whole concept is horseshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:43 PM
2

Well I don't understand how many times I can answer the same question. You people ask me what I think "amused mastery" is, I tell you. I even posted a video. What more do you want? Let me try again. It's like that episode of Dexter's Laboratory, when he used cartoon science to grow a ridiculously bushy red beard because he heard his mom say that beards make a man look "rugged," then he starts walking down the street with it with a newfound swagger in his step. Suddenly when the cops show up and …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:39 PM
2

There is a huge jump here you're ignoring. The fact that Congress has some limited authority to impose taxes does not give it the authority to create social welfare programs. It does not restrict the ability of congress to create social welfare programs either. You are correct, the Commerce Clause has been used to expand federal power over the years. What you haven't convinced me - and what opponents of social programs like welfare, social security, medicare, and so on have failed to convince th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:31 PM
3

Sounds more like to me that you're using the "I'm offended" dodge to not respond because you have no freakin' clue what you're talking about. But whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:23 PM
9

Blackstone's concept of innocent until proven guilty has been destroyed in favor of "yes means yes". This principle has existed for centuries, but in the face of a decreasing amount of rape, we HAD to do something drastic because womynz!, so out the window it goes. In real life, if there is no evidence a man has actually raped a women, he will not be convicted of the crime. "Yes means yes" is not actually what convicts people. There was a man in Canada arrested for "harassment" despite not makin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:20 PM
-1

I've answered it three times already. It's like when a guy tries to act like "The Fonz" from Happy Days because he thinks that's going to help him convince girls to remove their panties for him, because it real life he's closer to Potsie, and he knows it. Most women are able to see through such bullshit from a mile away. Basically, it's all an act, put on by insecure morons who think reading shit on the internet will get their dick wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:10 PM
5

That's strange, because Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution of the United States of America says the following: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence[note 1] and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; So if the government levying taxes, then using the revenue from those taxes to enact programs is "against the phi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 04:02 PM
-3

It's when a guy puts on this phony-baloney confidence ploy and tries to act like the "Golden boy" in those Golden Grahams commercials from back in the day. He does this because his head got all swimmy over a girl he likes, and he thinks that if he can fool her into thinking he's "cool," then he'll get to sniff her vagina later. Video for visual reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rp71iq-3DY
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 03:50 PM
0

This is not an explanation of what amused mastery IS but your characterization of what you believe the psychological state of the person engaging in it is. That's just your opinion. can you define what the concept "amused mastery" actually IS? It's when a guy tries to act like he has everything under control to project a false sense of confidence, in the hope it will help him get in a girl's pants later. It's a false sense of confidence, because if he had any real confidence he wouldn't have to …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 03:31 PM
-1

What the fuck are you talking about? For real, please tell me what you mean by this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 03:29 PM
13

That's total bullshit. Compare the policies to Bernie Sanders to Donald Trump, and tell me which ones are "opposite of the founding philosophy of the country." No wonder Redpillers tend to be conservatives, they both live in an alternate reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 03:22 PM
11

Can you give us an example of these Muslims you speak of actually implementing sharia law in Sweden? Because last time I checked such religious laws have no actual force of government behind them. Also, which law, exactly, "destroy freedoms" in your opinion? Do you think men who vote left should also not be allowed to vote? Or is it okay to be a leftist as long as you don't have a vagina?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 03:20 PM
6

It's when you cover up your insecurities and feelings of ineptness with a "too cool for school" type attitude, hoping the girl you're trying to bang won't notice how ridiculous you look and how you're really just a child in an adult's body.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 03:13 PM
1

You don't understand. There is no "counter solution." Being yourself is only worthless if you're an asshole who nobody likes; in that case, by all means change and improve yourself. That's the problem with these people you describe, they think all they have to do is put in a cheat code and women will suddenly flock to them. Up up, down down, left right, left right, B A Start and suddenly they're Ron fucking Jeremy. Sorry but real life doesn't work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 03:29 PM
1

Total bullshit. No one is scared of sexbots. The entire notion is ridiculous. The people who would buy sexbots are the same people who buy fleshlights and such today. Absolutely no one cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/15 04:31 AM
1

If I had a magic spell that made women love me, I would share it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 09:44 PM
4

They could start acting like normal human beings, and stop trying to find a magic formula to get them laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/15 07:38 PM
-1

Please stop reading this red pill shit. It's going to screw up your mind. Seriously, please stop before you hurt somebody.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 08:41 PM
-1

Yeah, that's complete bullshit. There is no conspiracy, you morons.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 06:15 AM
1

Welp, it sounds like a bunch of horseshit to me, but who am I to say? Sounds like you have the perfect RP relationship - you get to bang other women, have the stability of a marriage, and also control access to your wife's vagina. It's everything I wanted in a relationship also, when I was seventeen. Those "duplicitous dumbasses" you mention? They're Redpillers too. That's how TRP tells them to act. That's why we make fun of that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 02:51 PM
1

Conditionally, of course. Gotta maintain frame. That comment pretty much confirms everything I've been saying. Edit: I bet your wife doesn't have much say about who you get to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 03:30 PM
1

Just don't tell me TRP is a descriptive model of relationships, because in real life it's has very little to do with how people actually interact. If it were simply that, all that "Women shouldn't vote" and "women are children" bullshit wouldn't be there. So, do you allow your wife to have sex with other dudes? You didn't answer that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 02:57 PM
1

Bullshit, everything in the red pill is about "should." You should work out and lift weights. You should be dominant. Your wife should be submissive. You should sleep with lots of girls and have "plates." You should not get married to a "slut," but you should feel free to have sex with her. And so on. The reason it all rings so hollow is because it's not a description of real life. It's a description of what a teenage boy thinks being a man is all about. You're married, but it's not monogomous, …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 07:25 AM
1

Bullshit, TRP is not amoral. It has a different set of more selfish, more retarded, less logical morals. Women are hypergameous, and are no better than children. Men should all be dominant. Women should always be subserviant. "Beta"males are to be despised. Men who bang lots of women are to be admired, while women who do the same should be shunned. Families and relationships should follow traditional gender roles. AWALT.These are all examples of morals which TRP espouses. I'd you look closely, y…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 07:49 PM
3

I stand corrected.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 04:37 PM
10

... and that's why people think Redpiller's are rape apologists.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/15 04:37 AM
2

There's nothing new. It sounds familiar because it's what young boys think "men" should be. I.e, big, strong, banging a different women every night, not giving two shits about anyone but themselves, not weighed down by any family responsibilities, etc. It's like a bunch of teenagers sat around watching rap videos all day, then deciding the mythical made-up gangsta in the music video is who they wanted to be when they grew up. It's total bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 03:57 PM
1

I'm afraid I don't see how one can take a "middle way" when it comes to restricting voting rights for a person simply based on their gender. You're either for it, or against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 04:01 AM
1

Maybe it's the "women are children" and "women shouldn't vote" crap that makes TRP toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 02:58 AM
7

The redpill subs will not give you a rational explanation. These subs are borderline hate speech, please be aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 03:30 PM
8

Please don't come to this sub for dating advice. Many of the people here believe in very toxic things.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 03:17 PM
0

The stuff they say sounds like it was made up by teenagers. When I was 17, TRP would have appealed to me. Lift weights, make money, get a different girl every night and ditch her if she complains, it all sounds really fun and appealing, to a child. Then you grow up, and you realise it's all bullshit. You know what it sounds like to me now? Like people who watch rap/r&b music videos, with the rich guy getting all the bitches and being the envy of other men, and then thinking that shit's real. In …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 08:47 PM
1

Q: Why cannot u peeoples beleeve in my irratuonal misogynistic phil-os-so-fee despite all the backwards misinterpreted pseudoscience I pulled out of muh ass to back it up wit? A: Because it's bullshit made up by teenagers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 07:40 PM
0

Holy fuck. You're not even reading the links you posted. Tell me, how exactly could there be parity in the yearly rates, but such an overwhelming difference in lifetime rates? Read the report carefully, and tell me why this is so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 09:29 PM
0

So after all that shit, this is what you have to say? You did read those links you posted, right? Let me post for you again my favorite part: Unsurprisingly, when the definition of rape — or, as it's often now called in order to provide less clarity, "sexual assault" — expands to include a lot more than behavior distinguished by superior physical strength, the incidence of rape goes up, and behavior engaged in by women is more likely to be included in the definition. (At juvenile detention cente…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 06:35 AM
1

Well, let's see. According to A rape epidemic — by women? CDC doesn't count instances where women rape men as rape, instead it's listed as "made to penetrate" the other person. This is bundled in with "other sexual violence." The first problem is, the same report gives lifetime stats of 19.3% of women were raped by men, while 1.7% of men were raped by other men. by This is 19.3% of women, versus 1.7% of men. The numbers are not even close. If we include "made to penetrate" under the umbrella of …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 06:21 AM
1

Replied to the wrong guy. If you want to see it, here it is: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3hf6vm/why_is_it_that_only_women_are_relieved_of_sexual/cu7zx8u
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 06:19 AM
-1

Nope, that's not it. The links you posted give plenty of evidence to disprove your arguement. Let's see if you can spot it before I get home.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 09:30 PM
2

I did not say there is no such thing as female rapists, only that the danger of being raped by one is so small that it's a non-issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:34 PM
2

The only thing keeping me from shredding your argument like toilet paper is that I'm at work right now. Why don't you read through those links you posted, and try to predict what I'm going to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:33 PM
2

If it were merely about sex, there wouldn't be so many threads about biotroofs, calling women children, or removing the vote from women either. None of that stuff has anything to do with sex and how to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:02 PM
-2

It's because female-on-male rape is such a rare occurrence that the danger from it is virtually nil, whereas male-on-female rape occurs every 107 seconds. Feel free to downvote me, it's only the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 02:50 PM
1

So even though the bias in op's obviously loaded question is apparent to you, you didn't choose to challenge it, because ... why exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 07:14 PM
2

Let's see...you take the definition of "intelligence" that the OP uses specifically for this question (as the OP himself noted) as being A) in fact not specific just to this question, and B) as indicative of how RPers view intelligence, neither of which conclusions is supported by anything in the debate. The point is, OP is defining "intelligence" specifically in a way in which he thinks excludes women. It fails twice, once because there are millions of beautiful women in STEM fields the world o…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 03:30 PM
7

How the fuck is that a strawman? That is the rule that OP put down for someone to be considered intelligent. Suddenly all artists and writers are now not intelligent - you know why? It's because there are very few famous beautiful female scientists, that's why. What OP doesn't realize is that there are hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of very beautiful women who are also doctors, programmers, engineers, scientists, and so on, but none of them are as famous as Neil Degrass Tyson, so when y…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 02:51 PM
3

Because musical/writing/artistic ability requires more than just the unthinking execution of rules that Repillers consider to be "intelligent." For people who claim that women are unable to think in abstract, they seem to illustrate that very much themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 05:43 AM
2

I love how artistic/musical or writing ability is not considered "intelligent" by red pillers. But yes, I've known many, many beautiful women who work in those precious STEM fields you people seem to get so wet about.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 05:41 AM
0

No, he's equating "tall," with "masculine," and "more redpill." He is not simply saying women like taller men. He's attributing traits to tall men, simply because they are tall. Women don't just like tall men because they're tall, they like them because tall men are more redpill. Read it again. That is the problem with this Red pill bullshit, it relies on magical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 03:00 PM
1

Sure. So tell me, isn't this idea just internalized sexism? That the man has to be taller than the woman? And doesn't this prove TRP right that women prefer a more masculine, "Red Pilled" man to be their dynamic?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 02:46 PM
2

Nope. And /u/epicureanist[1] was nice enough to spell it all out for you, and you still didn't get it. So when he equates height with masculinity, that doesn't actually mean height corresponds with masculinity? Read that quote again: So tell me, isn't this idea just internalized sexism? That the man has to be taller than the woman? And doesn't this prove TRP right that women prefer a more masculine, "Red Pilled" man to be their dynamic? This must have like, a hidden meaning then, yes? What the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 02:44 PM
1

Typical blue piller. First you give what you claim to be an answer. Then when pressed you admit there is no answer. What you fail to understand, is there is no correct answer. There is no foolproof method that will prevent every woman you date ever from ever cheating on you. Maybe you'll just have to rely on yourself to judge the character of the person before you date them. (A) this conversation isn't about making people love you. (B) literally nobody suffers under the delusion that there is a …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 06:44 AM
2

I didn't say it. The OP said it. I'm asking how exactly this is supposed to make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 06:28 AM
1

When OP said this: So tell me, isn't this idea just internalized sexism? That the man has to be taller than the woman? And doesn't this prove TRP right that women prefer a more masculine, "Red Pilled" man to be their dynamic? Since women like tall men, then they must automatically prefer masculine, tough, redpill men. Because all redpillers are tall. That is what the guy is saying, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 06:27 AM
1

The answer is: You can't. There is no magic formula that will make every woman love you. Unless you can read people's minds or see the goddammed future you're just gonna have to make the same mistakes as everyone else. Here's an idea: Maybe if you don't treat your girl like shit, she won't go fuck other guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 09:54 PM
3

Please explain to me how tall you are determines how masculine you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 09:50 PM
5

I like how being tall suddenly means you're a more masculine, redpilled man. God damn, this shit is retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/15 07:43 PM
1

Sorry but that's bullshit. Attractive men of all races date women of all races in this country. White women are not intrinsictly racist against Indian men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 01:42 AM
1

What, exactly, is so hard to understand about it? If the person you're dating wants to have other partners, and you are not okay with that, then do not date that person. How the fuck is that complicated?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 01:39 AM
1

I fail to see why being Indian gives you any special disadvantage. That's latent RP racism talking.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 06:42 PM
6

Don't date a guy/girl who makes you a side bitch. End of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 06:40 PM
8

Except in real life they had no such chance. Read a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 06:34 PM
6

Im not going to try explaining the history of oppression of women and the effect of traditional gender roles on innovation and scientific advancement. Read a book. Come back in 100 years. If everything you consider of value is still created by men, then I'll agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 03:47 PM
1

Yes, occasionally I've seen the racisim of the "rational racisim" variety.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 03:39 PM
7

Everything this guy says is bullshit.
/r/MGTOW04/08/15 06:38 PM
2

In a discussion about relationships, the only way for it to be well rounded is to include both sexes. Saying "men do it too" should not be an excuse, however pointing out one sex while ignoring the other doesn't give us the full story.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 06:33 PM
1

Wrong. It does. It means ALL of them have the capacity for that behavior because it is socially and biologically ingrained. All men have the capacity for shitty behavior as well. Should I explain that one more time for good measure? That's a good example of why TRP is stupid bullshit, made up by children. "Women" is such a broad term, encompassing billions of people from hundreds of countries and ethnic groups. So a woman in China is going to react to the same situation as a woman in South Ameri…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 02:28 PM
1

So the correlation-equals-causation fallacy, that relies on my emotions, huh? How about the Constitution of the United States of America says women get the right to vote? Does that rely on my emotions also?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 05:47 PM
1

Then you would be defending an argument that relies on the correlation equals causality fallacy. The OP simply posts divorce rates and correlates them key dates in women's enfranchisement, with no actual, real proof the two are linked. He even fucking admits it: So how is this last part all related to women voting? Well it isn't directly. It's an idiotic conspiracy theory, that since women can now vote, then they're using their new found political power to vote for laws which then extracts money…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 05:10 PM
1

Well, okay. So what reason, exactly, would you give to support the position that having a vagina should disqualify someone from voting?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 04:37 PM
1

So the word All doesn't actually mean All, correct? Interesting. So what about when Tpers say "Women are like children," what's the hidden excuse message behind that? This is such bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 04:00 PM
1

So it's my "worldview" that makes me "emotional" when Tpers advocate for removing women's rights to vote? This makes me biased? So if I wasn't so emotional, I would think disenfranchising someone based solely on their sex is a totally rational thing? Can you smell the bullshit, or shall I shovel some more your way?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 03:55 PM
1

That shit happens. They're not saying ALL WOMEN do this. They are saying these are general behavior patterns. You seem to be doing a good bit of cherry picking yourself. Go ask TRP if most of them think women are actually inferior. You will find most don't. So when they say AWALT, that is "All Women Are Like That," that actually doesn't mean all women are really like that? You're making excuses for a flawed, childish philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 06:38 AM
1

I've already said what I had to say. You seem like a very sad, sad man, who needs to get his priorities straight. Have some self respect. Life is not all about pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 06:37 AM
1

Bullshit... the entire "movement" is built around entitlement - that is, men who feel entitled to use any underhanded tactic they can to have sex, including lying, cheating, or misrepresenting themselves. The top two comments in this thread ooze an entitlement mindset. And nope, TRP is not amoral, it simply imposes it's own backwards-ass version of morality, a version where men can do no wrong. Men who cheat on their girlfriends or wives are treated as heroes, yet woman who do the same are vilif…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 06:34 AM
1

Sounds more like to me you're making excuses for it. None of that shit actually has much to do with "sexual strategy," yet it seems to me discussion of such topics takes up the majority of threads in TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 06:29 AM
0

How exactly am I being emotional? Claiming women don't deserve to vote because it results in higher divorce rates is stupid and retarded. Where does the emotion come in?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 06:27 AM
0

Yes, I am aware there are studies on human sexuality. TRP seems to cherry pick these studies to reinforce conclusions they've already drawn, i.e. women are inferior, women have less cognitive reasoning ability, women are hypergamous and that's she'll leave you when a guy with bigger arms and a fatter wallet comes along because she's a slave to her vagina, and so on. I'm simply saying that's all horseshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 04:52 PM
0

That's not what the top comment in this discussion says. It says there's an "unconscious conspiracy" to rob men of sex through media and "fairytales" about morality. Because the fact that every single woman doesn't instantly fall to her knees and hand out blowjobs on command, that's like society's fault, yo.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 04:05 PM
0

If that were so, there wouldn't be all this bullshit about removing women's voting rights, or "divorce rape," or men being genetically smarter than women, or that women are the same as children, or other such nonsense being thrown around in that sub so often. It seems to be only about self improvement insomuch as a tool to manipulate women with. And no, these aren't straw men. We can easily go to the red pill and pull up a dozen threads about all of these things. How exactly is sexual strategy a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 03:49 PM
0

When you see my name, feel free to not read it. Besides, I am helping you guys. I'm helping you to not blame women for your own inadequacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 03:47 PM
0

Then feel free to go undercover at your local college's sorority house and do a field study. You can be like Jane Goodall. You can call it "Bitches in the mist." Let us know how that works out for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 03:12 PM
1

''You can't get a woman because you don't see women as individual beings. We are all special snowflakes who are completely different from each other.'' <--- that's how women think. Which "women" are you talking about? Every single woman in the world? French women? Ethiopian women? Chinese women? What about just American women then? So a woman born, raised, and living in southern Alabama thinks and believes the exact shame shit as someone from Utah, or Washington? Every single one of these people…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 02:56 PM
1

You said "You are now one of us." But regardless, RP didn't invent the concept of self improvement. If they would stop bundling it with all the other b.s. more people would take it seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 01:43 PM
0

It's called an analogy. It's a bad analogy. Is there anything wrong with teaching men what's wrong with their approach? If it comes bundled with a very large dose of misogyny, conspiracy theory, pseudoscience, and borderline hate speech, then yes. You can shout "it's your fault" at someone until the cows come home, unless you actually present alternatives it wont make any difference, it just makes the unsuccessful person unhappy as they examine all their flaws with no knowledge of how to change.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 01:41 PM
0

Do you say the same about criminals? Is it all black people's fault they they're grossly overrepresented in the prison population, or does their upbringing and environment have something to do with it? That would imply that I associate "criminal" with "black person," which I do not, because in real life there are more white people in prison than black people. When I think criminal, I think "asshole," not a specific skin color. Yes black people are over represented in prison, and yes, it is their…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 07:51 AM
1

I see RP people saying stupid shit on TRP all the time. Most of it seems to be about how it's so unfair that society forces them to treat women like human beings. Here's a good example: Women shouldn't vote, because of divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 07:00 AM
0

What we have been talking about all this time is what women find biologically attractive That's why you can't get a woman, because you're treating them like a science experiment. It's like you're studying the mating habits of bonobos or some shit. They're people, not animals. This is not the discovery channel.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 06:52 AM
0

Sorry but I don't think women can't help themselves from automatically jumping on the penis of whichever man that comes along who has larger biceps and makes more money than me. Also I think women deserve the right to vote, aren't out to trap me and steal my money, are capable of making adult decisions, aren't slaves to their feelings, and that there's no magical formula to make them want to have sex with me. I also think that all women are different from each other. So no. I am not red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 06:47 AM
-1

The only "conspiracy" is the one between your penis and your nutsack to override your brain and make you say stupid shit when a girl turns you down. It's not the woman's fault she doesn't like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 08:24 PM
5

Oh please... it's not the fault of "society" that a woman finds you unattractive. If every woman you meet doesn't want to peruse a relationship with you, then there is something wrong with what YOU'RE doing. Maybe you need to do some self examination instead of blaming everyone else. There is nothing "red pill" about it. There is no conspiracy between liberals and feminists and blue pill people to keep you from getting laid. There is only you, and your refusal to address that which makes you una…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 07:32 PM
8

You should not have children.
/r/RedPillParenting23/07/15 02:47 PM
1

In English please.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 03:47 AM
1

So all I need to have to be "disposable" is to have disposable income? So women with disposable income, are they examples of "female disposability?"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 01:34 AM
1

How exactly does that equate to the male being "disposable," again?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 07:35 PM
0

I think it's a load of shit, made up by men who are butthurt because society makes them like, get a job and everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 03:01 PM
-1

Nope, I didn't say anything of the kind, simply that older women are far more independent, more driven, and tend to not be clingy. I've even had a woman tell me "That was great, but you need to go home now." You read a lot into my comment that isn't even there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 02:33 PM
0

I think the worst part is that most men see older women as less inhibited and easy lays. Here's the thing: They are. But not because of some stupid phony-baloney "wall." It's because older women are more empowered and more open about their sexuality, so when they want something, they go after it. They don't play around with the complicated flirting rituals that young women do. An older woman will make it obvious she's interested in you from the start. The best part is she'll kick you out of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 07:17 AM
1

Who says people need to have roles anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 03:17 PM
1

So many [deleted] comments in here, I guess it goes to show this position really isn't defensible to any real extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 03:36 PM
3

It's the term "Break the creep barrier" that makes it sound like it's the woman's fault the guy is retarded. It makes it sound like certain men just "look like creeps," and no matter what they do they'll never get past it, like it's some kind of handicap.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 05:51 AM
10

This looks like a normal person with a healthy sex life to me. What, is she supposed to have sex with one and only one person? No one expects that from you people, correct? I notice how no one ever criticizes Redpillers for being on the "Pussy Parade."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 03:01 AM
1

8000 years ago people lived in huts or caves. We have no idea what kind of societies people lived in or what their sexual practices were. It could be that only the leader of the tribe got the right to the women, whether he was "alpha" or not. Basically, trying to frame the sexual practices of people we have no evidence of who lived over 8000 years ago in today's terms is fucking idiotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 02:58 AM
6

They want to clean your house, so they can get a chance at your penis? Yeah I bet that happens a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 02:33 AM
5

That doesn't sound like stupid ego stroking bullshit, plus there wasnt any obvious lies in it, so it's probaby mostly real.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 07:25 PM
13

They're usually made up bullshit, written to stroke some poor schleb's ego. I'm suppose some actual true stories might sneak in once in a while, but I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 05:29 PM
0

But there are quite a few men who can't get any unless they pay for it, simply because they can't "break the creep barrier." You mean men who are unattractive and treat women like children? The way you guys frame these things makes it always somebody else's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 02:49 PM
5

Yeah I say it pretty honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 02:07 AM
7

No, I acknowledge differing levels of attractiveness, however I understand that it's completely arbitrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 11:03 PM
7

I think it's an ideology that frames the world and relationships in a very immature way, and comes to erroneous conclusions based on heresay and stereotpyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 07:32 PM
1

I think TRP is more toxic than 3Rd wave feminisim by far.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 07:23 PM
1

Yes it is. It's dread, whether intentional or not. It's hard dread. It's as hard as dread gets. It's impossible to properly understand dread game and briffault's law without seeing a connection. You need to read the sidebar before commenting. But in real life briffault's law doesn't apply in many places and cultures. It's not really a law, in the legal or scientific sense, nor does it have much influence on daily relationships in the United States or elsewhere. It basically comes down to "if the…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 03:17 PM
5

I agree completely. I simply think TRP is a toxic ideology that makes the world a crappier place, and I don't think I need to offer an alternative in order to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 03:07 PM
1

"No no, it's perfectly fine. We do it all the time. It's a key part of our philosophy." No, you responded with "Briffault's law" which is not really "Dread game" as you defined it. I am asking you, again, for the fourth time, if a woman pulls dread game to you - specifically you - would you put up with it? Well, the answer is that any statement follows as true from an "if X then Y" statement, so long as the X is false. You've got a false X so any Y follows. Plug in, "then obama is a carrot" for …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 02:57 PM
1

Briffault's law isn't that she calls the shots. It's that the relationship exists only when she can benefit directly from it. It must not be much of a law then because there are many places on Earth where women do not benefit from the relationship, several in this very country. Already rejected this premise but okay. I don't care if you reject it. I am asking if it is not ok for you to respond to dread game, why do you expect a woman to? Answer my question or gtfo. No, shit tests are when someon…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 02:31 PM
1

Sorry but that's bullshit. In most human societies (and in many parts of our own) the female does not call the shots. That "law" is more like an axiom. My question to you is that if you are not expected to respond to dread game when the woman does it - I belive you call them "shit tests," why then is it acceptable to do the same behavior to her?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 11:20 PM
4

Gee you know, the other mra type people could have like, donated to him and stuff, kinda how feminists donate to feminist charities.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 11:05 PM
2

It would look like what I wrote, corrct? Some action to make me afraid she'd leave me if I didn't give in, yes? I assume this is something TRP doesn't tolerate from women? So why do you expect a woman to tolerate it if a man does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 08:58 PM
2

I assume it would be something of the "Do this or I'll leave you/not have sex with you type. I would tell her to get bent, as I would expect any adult to do the same to me if I tried similar such childish shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 07:28 PM
4

Negotiating your salary is not the same thing as talking to your partner about your relationship. If your boss really wants you and you threaten to leave, he'll up your salary. If a girl tried to "dread game" me if I didn't start doing XYZ, I'd tell her to get the fuck out. A relationship is not a job. It is a bad comparison. The dynamic is not the same. Dread game is the kind of shit children do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 03:24 PM
8

That would mean they would like, have to treat the woman as someone with a brain, capable of reason and such. Fuck that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 03:21 PM
2

So the people who don't engage in the less intelligent behaviors are the stupid ones? Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 11:23 PM
3

Yeah, that sounds about right. RP philosophy isn't the kind of thing intelligent people usually believe in. Looks like the science backs that up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 09:54 PM
1

There are no good women. Apparently that doesn't stop you from wanting to fuck them. Also, if you haven't caught on yet, over-generalizations like this is what makes TRP sound like bullshit made up by teenagers. There are billions of women in the world. You're already trying pretty hard. Maybe there are none. You're the one so hung up on the fact you feel I need a LTR to be complete as a human being. You ask me "Why would somebody want an LTR?" I give you reasons. I do not know what YOUR SPECIFI…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 02:57 PM
1

Unfucking likely. For you maybe. It's probably because you're wasting your time trying to "plate" multiple women and getting shot down instead of focusing on finding one good woman. Not for me. The downside of a LTR outweighs the potential benefits IMO. What, you want me to read your mind, or something? Find your own damn reason. LOL. Most people. Yes, people who are in successful, happy, healthy well functioning relationships get lots of sex. But that is not everyone and I would argue it isn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 06:48 AM
1

I like to have reasons when I do things. YMMV Maybe you're tired of the chase. Maybe you don't want to deal with the whole seduction and all the bullshit it entails. Or maybe you've actually truly met someone you care about for once in your life, and you want to be with her and nobody else. Any of those reasons good enough? LTR doesn't necessarily = lots of sex. See r/deadbedrooms[1] I didn't say if you were in a shitty LTR you would get more sex. I did say "successful," did I not? Most people, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 05:06 PM
1

Sorry but that's bullshit. It is not about maintaining Long term relationships - if it were, there wouldn't be talk of "plates" or "dread game" or any shit like that - because that crap will get you dumped in a second by any self respecting woman worth having a long term relationship with. What TRP is really about is living some dipshit idealized life of what you think an "alpha" male is like. It's almost like a bunch of children sat around watching Rap videos all day, saw a bunch of tough guys …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 05:30 AM
1

The reason? Who cares? It's different for everyone, correct? My point is, if it was really about getting as much sex as you could, then long term relationships would be the eventual goal. But they're not - because TRP is not really about just getting sex. It's about trying to emulate some bullshit ideal "alpha" male crap that doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 05:23 AM
2

It's more like a "bang as many girls as you can and brag about it" strategy. If it were truly about sex, and sex alone as you people claim, then you'd all be working out how to get into successful long term relationships where you would be guaranteed sex virtually any time you wanted. Instead it's more like a guide made up by clueless teenagers on how to dupe and manipulate your way into some girl's panties that you have no intention of calling the next day.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 08:56 PM
5

Joananism:The logical fallacy where you assume that everyone who doesn't agree with you is all the same. Just because I think TRP is a load of shit, does not mean I'm a rabid man hating feminist. That's the reason why I joined tbp, because to me, TRP is just another form of bigotry, one step below hate speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 08:44 PM
1

I think there is no magic formula to make a woman like you. But I know for sure being a dick, using that dark Triad bullshit, etc doesn't work with the majority of women in my experience. The thing is, even if it did, consider the type of woman that is attracted by such "tactics." If all you really truly care about is the actual physical act of coitus, and you don't seriously give a fuck about the actual person in the slightest, then why not just go straight to a prostitute and save yourself all…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 06:59 PM
2

No, it's not that we "don't know what it's like." We simply understand that if she turns us down, it isn't because feminism has somehow brainwashed her, so we don't have to resort to running around using idiotic pseudo-science to try and manipulate our way into her panties. You know, if you act like a dick, you're going to attract a very poor quality person. Maybe that's why you people can't keep a decent relationship going.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 03:20 PM
6

I love it when I hear the "women are children" line. To whoever says this: Go fuck yourself. Seriously, go fuck yourself. You don't know all the pain and sacrifices that women in this country and the world over have gone through in the past because it wasn't against the law to beat them, or leave them in the streets with nothing. You stingy, short sighted, spoiled-ass little freaks care about nothing and nobody but yourselves. You get dumped by some 19 year old floozy and then make bullshit stat…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 06:47 AM
1

What exactly do you want a link for? That TRP thinks that sluts are terrible people? You really need a link for that? Or perhaps when I said it's a good method to not get girls, or to get broken up with quick? Point yourself to any comment or post dealing with dread game, withholding affection, or "shit tests." All three of those will make you lose a relationship with any decent woman. We can talk more if you want, but you won't like what I have to say. Edit: Here's a question I've been thinking…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 02:05 PM
1

The problem with sluts isn't that they are terrible people, just not good for LTRs. The rest of The Red Pill seems to think they're terrible people. They are excellent for ONS and short term relationships, and that is encouraged. So I guess by that definition, every person who follows this red pill bullshit is also a slut, and is also then not good for LTRs. I know keeping track of multiple types of relationships is complicated, but let me know if you need more details on how these relationships…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 02:48 AM
8

What I really like, is that TRP is obsessed with "sluts" and calling women out for slutty behavior, but at the same time actively encourages their adherents to get as much pussy as humanly possible. Of course, it's not "slutty" when men do it, because of some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 02:45 PM
5

Jonanism: The logical fallacy where you assume that everyone you hate is exactly the same. For example, I think TRP is a load of idiotic woman-hating borderline hate-speech crap made up by teenagers, therefore I must be a crazed Social Justice Warrior, and thus must be pissed off when people make fun of Tumblr.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/15 04:36 PM
3

Because it's bullshit made up by teenagers, that's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 03:22 PM
2

That went right over your head. So the whites that were in America before my white great grandparents were racist towards then? A foreigner is someone from another nation, not a race. You are making this about race because you are a racist. Yes, they were. If your grandparents came from Ireland, Italy, or Eastern Europe, they were racist towards them. Please read about anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States circa 1880 - 1920 and you'll learn all about it. And fuck you, me pointing out shi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:04 PM
2

Geee, I guess I should tell all my (now dead) great grand parents to get back on the fuck on the boat and go back to Europe, because we don't like those kinds around here. I didn't say immigrants did not immigrate here. I said the notion that politicians give them free shit in exchange for votes is a load of racist crap. It's a dipshit right wing conspiracy theory made up by dumbasses to try and hide the fact they hate brown people. Edit: Please go back and read what people were saying about imm…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 05:35 PM
1

Oh, so you're racist? This has nothing to do with race. Yes it does. It's classic racist anti-immigration bullshit. All the shit that the Europens say today about Muslims, the morons here in America say the same things about latino immigrants from south of the border - the Democrats encourage them to come over illegally, they give them free shit (like "Obama phones") so they'll vote Democratic (even though illegal immigrants can't vote, and latinos who do immigrate legally tend to vote conservat…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 03:59 PM
0

The idea that we need forgien immigration to finance our debt, and that in turn spurns politicians to covet immigration (legal and illegal) and buy their votes with social programs, that is a load of 100% pure right-wing pseudo-white supremacist bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 02:44 PM
1

There is zero truth to that as well. I agree that's what Brevik believed, just saying it's a load of crapola.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 12:15 AM
7

What you're describing is essentially the opposite fo the golden rule. You treat people the way you'd like to be treated. Thus, if you want people to be nice and respectful towards you, then you are nice and respectful towards others. It doesn't matter how people treat you in return. Here's the catch: It doesn't always work. There are many people out there who will simply never reciprocate kindness and respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 02:59 PM
3

I think it's safe to say the Blue Pill doesn't care one way or the other about male (or female) virgins. I would say that it's probably many Blue Piller's like standing up to bullies, which is what that comment you posted is about. I subbed to this sub because to me, Red Pill rhetoric is one level below hate speech, and I make it a part of my life to stand against that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 02:37 AM
-1

First off, when you just pull some meaningless number out of your ass, it makes your whole statement meaningless also. "Men get hurt a hundred gajillion times more than women!" You sound like a moron. Secondly, how the fuck am I white knighting? Is there a woman I'm defending? Nope - all I am saying is we don't know the whole story, and when you automatically assume you know things that you can't possibly confirm, it results in ridiculous circlejerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 03:11 PM
-1

How about this: I am going to say whatever I want, when I want, and if you don't like it, you can kiss my big hairy buttcheeks. You think that men, and only men, get hurt by the courts? The truth is I can go find a support group for women and hear plenty of stories of women who get screwed by the system also. What do you want me to say? The system is fucked up? Yes, it is. But sitting around circlejerking and pretending that men can do no wrong isn't doing anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 02:37 PM
1

You know, it's a little hard to make informed opinions when all we have is one side of the story. Many times this kind of garnishment is done for a reason (i.e. years of not paying alimony/child support/etc.) For all we know, the guy quit his job before in an attempt to get out of such payments. All we're seeing is "look how much money this guy's blood sucking ex-wife is stealing from him." In reality it's never this cut and dry.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 04:27 AM
3

You owe this guy nothing. He picked up on your visual cues that you weren't interested - but he pushed on anyway. So don't be sorry about being rude to this person, he should have left when he saw you weren't into him.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 03:05 PM
1

I think I'd definitely be not be like other women, seeing how I have a penis and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 02:58 PM
1

Except in real life that comment is the opposite of sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 02:55 PM
10

Yes, "NAWALTS" exist. Every single woman out there is a "NAWALT," because the entire concept of "AWALT" is horseshit to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 07:28 PM
1

So when you say this then: We've seen ridiculous concepts like this become laws, Were you just lying to me then, or what? Also, please explain what you meant when you said this: The forcing of private citizens to engage in the gay marriage industry was long predicted by opponents. Do you have an example of someone who was forced to be gay married?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 08:33 PM
3

Nah, I just don't really think it has a chance of ever actually passing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 06:50 PM
2

I have yet to be disproven. I feel as if my stance has been vindicated. I remain strong in the belief that there is a clear difference between equality and Equality of Condition as terms. I suggest you read that wikipedia article again then, because clearly you're having trouble understanding it. The butthurt comment strikes me like a little toddler stuffing fingers in his ear and saying Nana Nana Boo Boo. Address the topic, not me as a person. What you're doing, is that since you accidently dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 06:49 PM
2

You are aware, of course that even 'fully alluding' to something is still hinting at it, right? As opposed to blatantly delivering on definitions, you vaguely poked in their direction. Well pardon fucking me for not using the eaxact fucking language of the fucking wikipedia article. What am I, a goddamned sociologist? This is exactly the fucking problem dude. I had to find the fucking article. You never gave me any of the shit I asked for, and yet you still sit around and think you are superior.…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 04:32 PM
3

Do you know any examples, of a man being convicted of rape, for holding a woman's hand? And what, exactly, is the "forcing private citizens to engage in gay marriage," all about, and how the fuck is it an "industry?" Are there cops out there now putting guns to people's heads and making them ass-hump each other? The law in that court case you mentioned is the Bradley Amendment, specifically designed to prevent men from not paying child support, then getting a judge to dismiss the accumulated deb…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 03:52 PM
1

No, to allow people Equality of Condition means not always treating them the same. Treating people differently is not treating them equally, it is treating them with Equality of Condition. How is this different than what my position is? You have been chasing me around the maypole by employing a term that you weren't fully using. And blaming me for not understanding a concept you only half alluded too. I fully alluded to it. It sounds pretty close to my first response, does it not? Being treated …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 03:42 PM
1

When you use the word equal, I assume you mean same. Then you assume wrong. I don't know why you would assume this, since I specifically said this was not my definintion in my very first response. If you would simply read that wiki article you posted, all of these things you're wrong about will be cleared up. You are right. It turns out, reality is full of discrimination. I don't associate any positive or negative connotation to that idea. It is reality. Having taken the red pill has actually he…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 03:00 PM
3

I think you have very little to worry about. Even if things like this do become laws (which they very rarely do,) court cases ususally tend to prove them unworkable. I highly doubt this will result in men getting thrown in prison for holding a girl's hand on the first date. From a quick read, it seems less to directed towards actual physical rape and more towards and "anti-groping" kind of action (i.e. feeling a girl up, slapping a woman's ass without permission, etc.) These kinds of policy revi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 02:06 PM
1

Your position says that men and women, in order to be treated equally, should also be treated the same through policy - the example being in case of a domestic violence call, both should be detained. Your position also says that men and women are not equal, correct? Here comes the clue train. It is because men and women are not equal, and because thus society must then form policies to even equality between genders, that such policies as the above exist. See, like I said in my very first post, y…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 01:49 PM
1

I pulled this definition from the Wiki article on it. Feel free to provide any other you'd prefer to work from. Note that bit that I bolded. It is important, because it fundamentally counters what you've said about social equality not meaning 'same' treatment. I guess you forgot to read the rest of that article, since pretty much every paragraph explains what "equality" means in a sociological context. If you hadn't stopped at the first thing that seemed to back up your point, you would have see…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 05:21 AM
1

In this case, the 'person most likely' is the one with a penis. You are literally employing an argument that calls for institutionalized sexism. You realize that, don't you? And you're somehow okay with that... Correct, because the one with the penis is also the one more likey to instigate violence. You did say that men and women had physical differences, correct? This validates your comment, you should be happy. The police however don't give a shit about percieved notions of sexisim, they care …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 03:29 PM
1

Despite the fact that you said we should be treating men and women equally under the eyes of the law, you are seriously bandying about the point that men should be auto-arrested no matter who the violent perpetrator was. Detaining the man is not the same thing as arresting the man. The man is detained because, chances are, he's the perpetrator of the crime. It's a safety precaution. Remember those physical differences you were so smug about pointing out a few comments ago? This is a consequence …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 02:14 AM
9

The theory in itself is stupid bullshit that sounds like it was made up by teenagers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 12:33 AM
1

Funny, because I'm pretty sure the word equal means the same. As in exactly the same. So, unless you can define the word equal to mean something else, I fail to see how we are equal. I didn't say we weren't equal. I said we're not the same. There is a difference, because we're not using "equal" as in a math equation, we're talking about "equality" in a social and legal matter. In order for the law to enforce the mandate that all persons are treated equally - that is, they have equal representati…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 03:26 PM
0

First off, TRP is not about "passing on genes," it's about having sex. If it really were about having offspring, then you people wouldn't be so afriad of having children. Secondly, the best way for a man to pass on his genes is to have a few children, then raise said children until adulthood. Ten thousand years ago it may have been true for a caveman to go around banging every female he could get his hands on, but in the last 1000 years or so that hasn't been the case. The real reason TRP celebr…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 04:22 AM
1

It would be incredible hypocrisy, if men and women were equal. We are demonstrably not. Wrong. Men and women are equal - under the law, and otherwise. What they are not, is the same. The problem with TRP and a lot of other anti-feminists is that they confuse these two. Being treated "equally" doesn't always neccesitate being treated exactly the same. There are certain disadvantages that both men and women have that necessitate different treatment, if they are to be treated equally under the law.…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 04:05 AM
1

Men are and that is a fact. Almost everything is made by men. If women were dominant, we would still be in caves. Are what, smarter than women? Any proof of that, that isn't full of horseshit pseudoscience? And what is this "almost everything is made by men" shit? You do realize that you wouldn't be using this computer to communicate this inane bullshit if it wasn't for a woman, do you? Women have the maturity of children. A great example is pushing single motherhood as positive. I find a lot of…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 03:09 AM
7

They're not manning up, they're digging themselves in deeper. I did try to give TRP a decent go, but I kept seeing rediculous threads like "Men are smarter than women" and "Women are children" and so on, filled with idiotic pseudoscientific blatant misogynist bullshit. That, coupled with the incredible hypocrisy (men who have lots of sex are champions, women who have lots of sex are whores,) the zombie-like adherence to traditional gender roles, and the peppering of dipshit libertarian claptrap …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 03:07 PM
3

I don't care what you want. If you don't understand my comment, then read it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 02:42 PM
3

No shit. That's why I said it. I did make a point, btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 04:18 AM
3

Anyone with an abundance of privilege, came to by birth, could not ever, without a high degree of thought, effort, and objectivism, come to understand the positions of those less fortunate, or those who do not have the same privileges. It's like you people come so close to self awareness. Just extend the thought a little bit further. You're almost there!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 02:42 PM
1

That's because it's a very adolescent view of relationships and the world. The older people have learned that being overly aggressive and not caring about morality in your relationships gets you nowhere in the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 02:34 PM
1

I see that arguement there all the freakin' time.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 02:40 PM
4

It says "Puppies randomly punished/loved develop stronger affections."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 06:07 AM
-1

I think the flaws start when the guy is comparing women to puppies. I mean, that's just when it starts.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 03:16 AM
0

Then you and me must be reading different subreddits.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 02:17 PM
-3

We are not talking about what I believe, but what Red Pill people say they believe. They are the ones who say thier horseshit is backed by science, when in real life it has no rational basis in fucking reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:49 AM
-1

The predeliction to believe in things that cannot be scientifically proven, as well as the tendency to rely on stereotypes, generalizations, and dogma. Because All Women Are Like That, yo.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 03:14 PM
-6

TRP has so much in common with religion, that it might as well be one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 02:42 PM
1

It prevents someone with an opposing view from ever changing the direction of the discussion. For example, if someone made a post that said "RP: Feminists cause cancer and here's why" I cannot respond. I would have to wait until a red pill view is posted, then I can respond to them. What ends up happening is only people who agree with the op end up posting.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 07:39 PM
1

Ah right. It still seems convoluted to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 03:04 PM
1

If my comment has to be from a certain point of view, then where does the "debate" part come in? So if I disagree with the premise of a thread, then I need to post a new thread, directed at the other side, in order to make my point? After those initial responses, the threads are completely open to discussion from any viewpoint. If one of those conflicting comments gets too high, it will be deleted. So why would I even bother commenting? That's a very directed discussion. Not much of a debate tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:36 PM
1

Its not a debate if only one side is allowed to comment on any given topic. The way the rules are set up turns thus into one big eco chamber.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:31 PM
0

That's why this subreddit isn't really a debate subreddit. It's a circlejerk subbreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 03:31 PM
11

Probably because of this: I'm not interested in the content of the Redpill posts and whether it's fucked up or not Why should someone try to critically examine the red pill if the people you're trying to convince don't give a shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 03:07 PM
1

I did not say it was the same. I said one was "like" the other. I was using one - the bank scammer - to illustrate how ridiculous the other one was. This is called a "simile," and it's a very common literary device used nearly by everyone ever in the history of time. I don't think you need to waste time deconstructing it. What you are saying is that in the case of a RP asshole manipulating a woman, then it is the woman's responsibility for staying in the relationship. This completely ignores the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 02:48 PM
0

How is it idiotic? You're blaming the victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 06:05 AM
0

That's like saying the victim of a con artist chose to give away credit card numbers to a Nigerian prince. What you're doing, is absolving the scam artist (or in this case, the manipulative redpiller) of any responsibility for his actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 07:05 PM
1

I would say both of those things are antithetical to critical thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 10:56 PM
1

I would say it's closer to the model employed by theists. Anecdotal evidence is exactly that - anecdotal. Theists often use such anecdotal evidence themselves to try and support miracles, the flood, creationism, the historical Jesus, etc. Scientists usually employ empirical evidence - that is, evidence which can be backed up by observable data, recreated by experiments. TRP does not use empirical evidence, this thread is about how to discount empirical evidence when it contradicts RP theology.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 09:06 PM
1

I call it the scientific method. It's certainly not the reasoning process that Red Pillers use. AWALT by itself disqualifies RP philosophy as science. This is a goddamned thread about when science comes up with evidence that contradicts RP thinking, then it's ok to ignore it. That is not using the scientific method. That's not even critical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 05:40 PM
1

You compared The Red Pill to science, correct? That is what you wrote, correct? That is what I'm responding to. I don't really care what bullshit philosophy to you follow, but I object when you compare it to science, because it's clearly not science. What you people do is the opposite of science. Edit: taking a glance at your post history makes me cringe. I only hope you are not a straight white man because if you are you must hate yourself down to your very core. Also, remember when I said TRP …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 04:56 AM
1

That's a load of horseshit. Redpillers use generalizations, stereotypes, and axioms in their reasoning in order to prop up ideology, to the point where when something contradicts their presuppositions - like say, an academic article - they come up with bullshit rationalizations as to why said evidence is irrelevant. This very thread is about trying to do just that. This is exactly the same thing religious people do. It's the opposite of the scientific method.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 04:57 PM
2

It's exactly the same. TRP is not based on "real world observations," it's based on ideology, and selfishness. It uses stereotypes and generalizations - All Women Are Like That, correct? That is the exact opposite of the scientific method. This very thread is about how to ignore when someone else cites an academic study that has evidence that goes against your conclusion. Like creationism, the thought process behind it exists to fulfill an ideology. So please, don't compare TRP to science, becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 02:24 PM
1

You don't need a study to cite an opinion. But if you claim your opinion is fact, then citing a study to back you up will help your case. The problem with Redpillers is they don't use critical thought in their arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 02:05 PM
2

It's like trying to argue with a creationist. It's the same mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 03:04 PM
3

It depends on the subject at hand. If you're discussing which flavor of ice cream you like better, then citing an academic study is irrelevant. If you're making blanket b.s. statements about the intelligence and monogamy of women, then yes citing a study would help your case.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 03:03 PM
1

OP stated that "men do not get any benefit from marriage." I am stating that's b.s., and the reason why he can't appreciate or even identify the benefits of marriage is because he has a selfish outlook on relationships. If we look at his post, it's because "Every example given could be written off as something I can attain outside of marriage." The guy is only thinking about himself and his pocketbook, and that's why he can't see any benefit. All of this shit you people keep saying about divorce…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 02:52 PM
1

Maybe it sounds like I'm repeating myself, because I am, because I only have one point - OP's mindset is too selfish to appreciate marriage. That's the only point I've made, in this entire thread. YOU motherfuckers are the ones who keep bringing up this "shaming" bullshit, or trying to come up with horseshit reasons to justify it. You yourself do this in this very post, citing divorce and bankrupt courts, with a nice side of misogyny to go along with it - unless you're going to try and claim tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 02:53 PM
1

No, I am telling him he is limited and selfish because he only considers his own self interests. The institution of marriage is not lacking value - he only values himself, that's why he can't find value in it. And once again I don't want op to feel anything. What he feels in reaction to my observation is his problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 10:11 PM
1

Bullshit, because that implies that I want him to feel ashamed. I do not give a shit what he feels. I'm simply pointing out that his attitude towards marriage and relationships is selfish, and its not because of the percieved shortfalls of the institution of marriage that he's unable to see its benefits, but only the fault of his limited, selfish outlook. In short, you morons can feel about it however you want, but that doesn't remove your responsibility for your own shortfalls.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 08:34 PM
1

Please explain to me where, exactly, I siad anyone should feel shame. I'm simply pointing out how selfish I believe op's outlook on marriage is. I give no fucks if he feels shame about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 01:51 AM
1

First off, I don't see where the "shame" part is, I'm simply illustrating for you the reason why your mindset is not intended for marriage - the problem lies with you, not the institution of marriage. Why? Because you think of it solely in terms of what it can do for you. Not what it can do for your wife, or a family, or children, or society, or anything else. Just like you said: if I'm not in everything I put my heart into, for myself, then who is going to look out for my best interests. I gues…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 12:23 AM
1

There you go again, you're only thinking about what benefits you. Its not only about what you, yourself, personally will get. That's the problem with RP thinking in general. Relationships are not all about you. If you're not ready to change the way you think and move away from this selfishness, then you aren't ready for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 07:45 PM
1

Marriage is about commitment, and sharing, and building a life as equals. If you're scared that you'll lose half of everything you own, then you're not ready to be married. Its not about what the benefit solely to yourself is, it's about the benefits you can bring to each other through love, support, companionship, etc. If this us what you're hung up over, i.e. "What do I get out of it?" - then you shouldn't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 05:10 PM
5

I would say undertaking actions without regard to thier effect on others is a good definition for "asshole."
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 09:46 PM
1

I hope you realize you're simply making the same point that some feminists do. It's precisely because of the effect of alcohol on such inhibitions that the feminists argue a drunk woman can't give consent. All you're saying is that some women do this on purpose. Now please, imagine that you had actually been raped when you were drunk. Please put yourself in that position. What exactly would you think if somebody said to you what you say above? Just because you, yourself, personally, claim to alw…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 04:00 PM
6

TRP is based off stupid shit teenagers made up justify acting like dickwads. It has very limited, immature notions of what being a man and relationships are all about. Put simply, TRP is designed to remove responsibility from the man for his actions.
/r/ExRedPill25/03/15 06:23 AM
5

I see the parallels between both as well, however TRP seems a lot worse to me. The tenants of TRP really will fuck up the world if left unchallenged.
/r/ExRedPill24/03/15 02:42 PM
0

I fail to see how that's relevant to my observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 02:27 PM
1

What you're doing, is called the "no true scottsman" fallacy. It's not up to you to determine who is and who isn't part of your little club. The woman posts in that subreddit, so obvious she follows (or wants to follow) the red pill philosophy. I'm merely pointing out that you people say "Red pill women don't tell other people how to live their lives," yet it didn't take me very long to find an example of exactly that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 04:27 AM
0

So you mean like, generalizing the behavior of an entire group of people by the actions of one person is like, wrong and stuff? You mean, that is contrary to Red Pill thinking? Oh, ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 04:16 AM
0

Well, you said "RPW don't care how other people lead their lives." So I go over to RPW, and the very second thread is someone bitching about someone else's life. That's what happens when you like, make generalizations and stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/15 07:13 AM
1

It's the same problem I have with religious fundamentalists - they fuck up the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 03:12 PM
6

I would say they're up to their balls in hate, because it's true.
/r/ExRedPill19/03/15 04:37 AM
1

This happens because you're arrogant - and I'm not saying this to be a dick. I have no idea who you are or what your life is like, but from what you've described your problem is that you think you deserve to be "amazed." When was the last time you amazed a girl you were with, every single day? Relationships are a two way street. Like when you dumped that girl because she was "okay." So she didn't do anything wrong, she wasn't an insane ball crushing cunt, but she didn't "amaze" you, correct? I b…
/r/ExRedPill18/03/15 03:12 PM
2

Yeah, that's total bullshit. There is no "need" to treat people like they're dogs. What TRP is, is simply people rationalizing their narcissistic, destructive, asshole behavior. Simply put, it's men who do things they might consider to be douchebaggy, but instead of modifying their behavior, they rationalize it away. "Feminism" didn't "force" these men to act this way - they act this way because they're assholes. These men are not "victims" of anything except their own egos. It's complete total …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 06:37 AM
2

But they do serve McNuggets. If I say all kids like McNuggets then what is the point in arguing that McNuggets is bad, selling them is bad, and we shouldn't make them simply because it isn't true that all children like McNuggets. If I'm only selling them, it's fine to assume that all kids like them, but if I do run across one that doesn't I just dismiss them and go on to the next kid. You're arguing semantics, but not the fact that women do act like that. If there is a woman that doesn't, RP men…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 04:39 PM
2

Thank you, master of the obvious. Apparently you lack the higher cognitive skills to see why exactly it doesn't why it doesn't work. I'll lay it out for you: You are blaming "feminism" for the actions of women you don't agree with, and extending those actions to include all women, everywhere. I am blaming the people who engage in the actions I don't agree with for perpetrating those actions. I am not blaming all men everywhere because you guys have dipshit notions about relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 04:29 PM
3

That's like saying just because some kids like chicken nuggets doesn't mean kids like chicken nuggets. Sure there are kids that don't like chicken nuggets, but that's not what McDonalds concerns themselves with. Same with the RP doctrine comment. Wrong. Saying some kids don't like chicken McNuggets means some kids don't like chicken McNuggets. I am not the one generalizing here. YOU ARE. I am saying "some," as in "not all of them," as in "a portion of," or "a sample of" or "a few, but not the to…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 04:22 PM
2

You're demonizing feminism as a way to skirt responsibility for your actions. Remember that other post where I compared the thought process behind TRP to racism? This is a good example. Remember when you said ALWLT was not taken literally? This is you actually taking it literally. Feminism is not to blame for you people having bad relationship experiences. You are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 04:08 PM
2

So you agree that it does attract women. Glad that clears that up. No, it attracts some women. Stop generalizing. It makes you sound stupid. Again, you agree with RP doctrine. No, I am not agreeing with RP doctrine. I am criticizing Red Piller's tendency to generalize as a weakness in critical thinking. AWALT is not literal, it is the understanding that women are capable of doing these things so you don't put them on a pedestal just because they are women. When you have a literal AWALT mindset y…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 03:48 AM
2

Nope, this is not about "my feels." It's about this idiotic destructive behavior which has real world consequences for people. Why am I concerned? Why do I care? For the same reason why I care when people in Texas try to teach creationism in the class room as science, or when some asshole blows away a bunch of endangered red footed falcons as target practice - because it fucks up the country. What you people teach has a demonstrable negative effect on the lives of young people. Simply put, TRP i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/15 03:13 AM
1

And neither does TRP. Nobody's trying to persuade you of anything. Stoicism attracts women whether you think it does or not. No, it attracts some women. That's the problem with TRP, it uses generalizations that oftentimes have no basis in fucking reality. Some women are turned off by emotional displays. Some women are turned off when a man gives voice to his weaknesses. Some women are gold digging whores. You people turn around and then claim All Women Are Like That when that's completely false.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 04:15 PM
1

In my analogy, the robber is the woman. I am comparing a man being dumped/divorced and then taking up this TRP stuff to a man being robbed then joining the Klu Klux Klan. My point is that the anger is misplaced - Just as it's not the fault of all black people that some black people engage in crime, it is also not the fault of all women that some of them are reprehensible people. Before you say TRP agrees with that, let me remind you that stereotypes and generalizations are central to RedPill thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 03:57 PM
-1

Well see, that's the problem. It's kind of like a guy who gets robbed by a black man, then goes out and joins the Klu Klux Klan. Bad experiences with certain people in no way justifies stereotyping all such people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 06:26 AM
1

You've never actually met any Swedish people, huh? At least we don't have Nazis running around in the USA.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 06:23 AM
1

Which first world country out there, exactly, does not have these problems?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 03:39 AM
2

All men aren't dogs. All women aren't heartless vampires waiting to sink their teeth into their hapless male victims. There are good men AND good women out there. And do you know how you get them? You have to BE one of them. Red Pill teaches this in its own sub. Just a quick comment - TRP doesn't teach how to be a "good" man. What it teaches ends at getting into the girl's pants. Very little thought goes beyond obtaining sex. It's extremely superficial and self serving.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 03:57 PM
1

Why? What's wrong with America?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 05:01 AM
1

That's total bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 03:17 AM
0

You live in a city with millions and millions of people. Look some more.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 03:38 AM
1

Marriage doesn't prevent people from up and abandoning families, it happens all the time. If you're the kind of person who is willing to leave your family, I really don't think you're going to stop and think, oh crap, I have this legal obligation. The one caveat being people who are afraid that if they do leave, then the wife/husband will get sole custody of the kids. If that's the case, you aren't trying to leave your family, you're trying to leave your spouse. You are correct. Marriage does ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 03:37 AM
1

I'm sure there are RPers that fuck up and marry the wrong girl. Doesn't mean TRP told them to. What's your point? My point is this Red Pill shit you people profess turns you into an asshole. Juggling women, treating them like shit, pretending all women are the same, preening like a fucking peacock, stealing each other's girlfriends, making decisions without regard to ethics - these are things fucking assholes do. If you are a self-important, narcissistic asshole, then you're only going to attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 03:46 PM
0

I'm saying the reason you attract selfish bitches, is because your phony excuse for a philosophy turns you into a selfish bitch if you follow it. I am not saying there are some magical land filled with wonderful fantasy girls who will obey your every whim.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 03:33 PM
2

First and foremost, it prevents men and women from just up and abandoning their families. It also promotes stable relationships which are better to raise children. But I think the fact that men who are married live longer might appeal to you selfish-ass Redpillers more than this other stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 03:31 PM
1

Correction: There isn't any value to getting married, to you. Just because you can't look past your inadequacy and fear that you may incur legal responsibilities for starting a family doesn't mean no one else finds value in it. You know, in most states you don't have to actually get married to incur some of the legal responsibilities. So you better break up with your girl before too long, don't want any of those common law marriage laws to come into effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:16 AM
0

What you said about marriage was a straw man argument. "You spend your energy trying to bang dumb sluts, what do you think is going to happen to you if you marry one of those?" Except that TRP specifically says to not marry a dumb slut. So no one ever who follows the red pill "principles" (fucking please...) will ever marry "a dumb slut." Because all the misogyny, and selfishness, and juggling "plates" and such, that's totally how you attract a decent, intelligent, non-shallow woman who won't du…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:11 AM
-5

Maybe if you treated women like human beings instead of interchangeable sperm receptacles you'd have better, longer relationships with less drama, then you wouldn' t be afraid of divorce so much. Like when you call women "plates." Yeah that's not misogynistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 04:04 AM
-2

Me saying that your character is lacking because you believe in this stupid redpill bullshit in no way makes what I say about marriage untrue - that is, that you should get to know your partner better before you marry them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 04:00 AM
0

You know, if you're afraid of divorce so much, you could get yourself a prenup.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 03:30 AM
-2

I don't have to assassinate your character if you believe in that red pill bullshit, because you don't have much character to being with. What I said is essentially "get to know your partner before you marry her." I did not say in any way, shape, or form that women are incapable of being assholes. I also love how you people keep saying this "she'll bleed you dry!" shit like you're some kind of target, like you have hundreds of women lining up trying to seduce you so they can invade your bank acc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 03:28 AM
1

It seems like a big argument from the Redpiller, MGTOW crowd is this "women will divorce you and bleed you dry" argument. Maybe that wouldn't happen if you people were a little more selective about who you marry in the first place? You spend your energy trying to bang dumb sluts, what do you think is going to happen to you if you marry one of those? The person you marry should excite more than your penis. Maybe you guys should spend some time actually developing real, relevant people skills, ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 04:28 PM
2

It's because TRP is horseshit made up by teenagers to justify it when they cheat and steal each other's girl friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 04:50 PM
1

I'm sorry, but this really makes no sense. Every time you post, not only does this philosophy seem more contradictory, it sounds more and more like shit somebody just made up to justify their immature behavior. You stress to me, several times, that ethical concerns are not taken into decision making, yet when I ask you about the logical extension of such thinking, you shrug it off with a No true scottsman fallacy. I understand completely. But that's where TRP somewhat contradicts itself (not rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 03:40 PM
2

Well if my goal is to get laid, and there are no ethical concerns in my decision making as to how to achieve that (as far as women are concerned,) then how is it not in line with redpill thinking to lie to achieve my goal? You have explicitly said that ethics are not considered, and only the result matters, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 08:45 PM
3

Unreal. But I said I wouldn't give any lip, so I won't. An example of lying to your partner to have sex, the following comes to mind: misrepresenting yourself, I.e. claiming things that aren't true, pretending to be someone you're not, or be friends with people you don't know, etc beyond the usual b.s. men feed women they're trying to get with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 08:19 PM
3

My problem is, I'm not sure what you mean exaclty, when you say ethical considerations are not included in decision making from a redpill perspective. Does this then give you any leeway to do any backhanded scumbag thing you want? Or are there limits? So, how about these scenarios? Having sex with a girl who's involved/married. Having sex with a girl who's involved/married, with a friend/relative of yours. Lying to a partner, or being dishonest in order to have sex. Having sex with a woman, then…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 06:53 PM
3

So can you give me a scenario that deals with ethics, and how redpiller and bluepiller would react? I promise not to give you any shit about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 06:10 PM
7

Howdy. I assume you read my last rebuttal. What you're describing is not science, it's the opposite of science. But anyway, can you give me a real world example, of a decision that doesn't take ethics into account? Like what do you mean, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 03:59 PM
1

It's because what's "attractive" is completely arbitrary, and up the individual. Overall, you could say most people find youth to be beautiful, but that's not universal. TRP, like in all it's "philosophy," merely makes generalizations about attractiveness that have little basis in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 03:50 PM
1

Then it is your own doing for not going through hundreds of women in a month, is it not? Coming off as a prick? Jeez, /r/seduction is right here. Please visit it. First off, you assume that having sex with hundreds of women in a few months is a positive thing, like life is some kind of video game and the only way to win is to bang as many chicks as possible. Not every man wants that, even if I could live such a life I would choose not to. I went to a pretty good university to get my degree in en…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 04:08 AM
3

It most definitely IS a strength. To go through hundreds of girls at clubs in a couple weeks/months, would you not use a generalization? I wouldn't "go through" hundreds of girls in a couple of weeks or months. When I talk to people (not just women,) I assume I don't know anything about them. That way it's easier to not come off like a prick. Let me give you a different example of a generalization/stereotype: You live in the U.S.A. You see a white man. You automatically speak English to him. Why…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 04:41 PM
1

Then your experiences are pretty limited. Yes, Redpillers tend to use AWALT - that is a fault of theirs, not a strength. The reason why these people are so bigoted and closed minded is because they use generalizations and stereotypes. Generalizations and stereotypes are not useful - because they are generalizations and stereotypes, and usually in real life hold very little truth. So when you run around saying these things based on these untrue assumptions, that all hot women are intellectually s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 03:54 PM
1

So much wrong here, but I think this illustrates it the best: From my experiences, the hotter the girl, the more 'in-tune' she is with body/verbal cues, the more men she can attract, and the more social she is. There's really nothing that would attract her to a subreddit like this in the first place. There's no socio-politcal agenda. Why would she care, anyway? She's already 'winning' at the social aspects of life. There's no incentive, no curiosity that makes her delve into a debate sub like th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 04:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter