Hawkson2020 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	"Incel" is the misandry equivalent of misogyny's "slut" — The difference being: the use of the latter is unequivocally seen as morally wrong & hateful by society Lmao how the fuck is "incel" genetic?? It's either referring to an ideology or it's being used as a dumb insult like "virgin" or "neckbeard".	/r/MensRights	17/04/22 07:06 AM
5	Stupidest thing I have ever read That may be the intent behind the tweet too. Unfortunately, since the user cannot be shown, it's difficult to judge if this is a troll account, or just a fucking idiot.	/r/MensRights	30/05/20 10:57 PM
-46	Racism vs Feminism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man	/r/MensRights	08/11/19 05:24 AM
3	Marketing experts labeled Gillette's sexist against men ad as the worst marketing move of the year, and they predict it will trash Gillette's sales I'm sorry, I genuinely don't know what you're trying to say here.	/r/MensRights	25/04/19 02:51 AM
7	Marketing experts labeled Gillette's sexist against men ad as the worst marketing move of the year, and they predict it will trash Gillette's sales I dunno, I think for a shit ton of people, probably the majority it isn't relevant. However, if a cast is fairly diverse or isn't very diverse (doesn't matter which) then it gets a bunch of Vice and Kotaku and whatever other garbage articles written about it, which provokes the obligatory 4chan and r/gaming response about either the extermination of cishetwhitemen or how minorities don't matter and any minority is just tokenism which is basically just racism. And then it seems like a way bigger …	/r/MensRights	25/04/19 02:11 AM
1	Double standards when it comes to the treatment of male and female vicitms of DV The video didnt have to prove anything because she wasn’t taking him to court. All it had to do was make him look bad in the public eye.	/r/MensRights	17/03/19 09:05 PM
17	Double standards when it comes to the treatment of male and female vicitms of DV I mean in this case Johnny Depp had to produce all that evidence because she accused him in the public eye, and so in order for him to sue her for defamation in a court of law, he had to produce evidence proving it. They're a far cry from being equivalent scenarios, although I do believe Amber Heard had video and photographic evidence (later proven to be doctored and selectively edited) to "back up" her claims as well. But yes, it is shitty that people believe these things so quickly when certai…	/r/MensRights	16/03/19 12:10 AM
4	Hmmmm lol r/atetheonion	/r/MGTOW	11/09/18 06:05 AM