TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hayasaka-chan Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by Hayasaka-chan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
25

And nothing of value will be lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/22 07:23 AM
1

It's not consistent because the basic facts of biology are not equal. Men can't fall just as pregnant as women. But men can usually decide where they put their semen. Don't want a kid? Don't stick your penis in a woman. Boom, problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 04:06 PM
1

Of course there is a special ethic here because their is the possibility of an entire human life being created. There just isn't a perfect answer here. You can thank biology for that disparity. Kids are not cars. Kids are not gifts that be just be taken back or walked away from. They are entire life forms. Again, in most cases, men have their chance to say no to kids. It happens before they have sex. If you choose to participate in sex you are choosing to potentially being responsible for a chil…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 04:02 PM
1

But the woman wouldn't have been in the position to make any decision without a man's input, as it were. And most men are completely aware that once they drop their semen in a woman whatever ultimately happens isn't their choice anymore. So knowing that, men getting all indignant about a woman exercising the choices she has is just pointless. Men know that women are the ultimate deciders and choose to have sex with women anyways. The men made their decision by having sex. They accept the risk. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 07:35 AM
1

If a man willingly has sex with a woman knowing that it can result in pregnancy and chooses to do so any way, he can't lay all the blame on the woman. It's not his choice to dictate what a woman does with her body. It is his choice to still stick his dick in her.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 06:11 AM
1

That's true, but it's not like any man can claim ignorance to what can happen. The lack of fairness comes from biology. The simple biological fact of women are the ones who get pregnant wasn't decided by the woman either. Any gripes about that have to be taken up with whoever/whatever decided that was the thing to do. So if the only foolproof way to avoid child support is to never have sex, well, that's the man's decision to decide what risks he's willing to take. If he decides to have sex and a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/19 05:59 AM
3

Men have control in most situations as to where they let their semen get released. Since the only 100% solution to avoiding babies is to not have sex men can make their own decisions. Women can't change the basics of biology any more then men can. Having sex = the possibility of making a child, even when all parties are being as responsible as possible. If you don't want kids, don't have sex. It's not necessarily fair but it is the reality of the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:43 PM
4

My godmother didn't know her IUD had "migrated" out of get uterus (years later they still haven't found it) until she came up pregnant. Except she was only kind of pregnant - she had a full molar pregnancy and had to get through chemo to get her body to stop producing pregnancy hormones. Things you just leave in your body like that scare the hell out of me. Before I found out I was interfile I was all aboard the birth control pills+ condom train. Neither my husband or myself wanted to leave anyt…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 07:18 PM
3

That is exactly why they are worth less than adults. It also wasn't their choice to be conceived, that was on their parents. Everyone has to be responsible for their own choices. Nice strawman. This is about financial and custody decisions, not medical ones. A woman may be more likely to abort if the father disestablished paternity but she still could keep it, consequences be damned. I had misread the comment I was responding to, so fair cop to it not being a medical discussion. Still though, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 07:51 PM
9

The CHILD literally cannot advocate for itself. It can't feed itself, work to earn the money to keep a roof over it's head, drive itself to the doctor when they are sick or even teach itself how to walk or read. The adults who made the joint decision to have sex which resulted in that child don't have that excuse. Look, is it fair to men that they can't terminate an unwanted pregnancy? No, not really. But that's a twist of fate caused by biology not the evil plotting of women in ages past specif…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 07:27 PM
3

Thankfully, the whole "the woman gets the kid no matter the circumstances" thing is dying out across the country. There are still pockets of that happening but more and more places are defaulting to 50/50 custody, there has to be a mutual agreement between the parents to change that or you have to prove why further divided custody is in the best interest of the child. With 50/50 custody there isn't a traditional child support payment to make. Ex.: My sister has 50/50 with her ex over their son. …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 07:16 PM
9

Situations like this is why I've always called myself the birth control fairy. Need a ride to Planned Parenthood to get your BC? You got it. Need a condom for a last minute date or hookup? I've got you. That's my public service. I have seriously gone down to a Quikstop to buy my older brother condoms when he was caught short. The resources are there though and if you can't afford a condom you can't afford a kid, which means you can't afford to have sex. People who get caught up in "well I didn't…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 07:03 PM
9

You cannot just sign away your responsibilities to a child that way. Sperm donation via legal channels or pre-arranged adoptions =/= hooking up with a chick and walking off into the sunset. It's biologically unfair that men don't get more say over picking when and how to be a parent but it's not like men are going into these sorts of situations blind. I wish male birth control would become available so men had more control - I say that as a woman. I hate using the term slippery slope but I think…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 06:59 PM
1

Just so I'm following what you're trying to say: what would be an example of a "hard wired" evolutionary rule? I'm not sure I understand what that means.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 07:57 PM
1

Didn't say I was sympathetic to the guy, just pointing out what I figured is the most likely reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 09:29 AM
3

It wouldn't necessarily stop a man from getting a job (some jobs do run credit checks but that isn't the norm for most jobs I've ever heard of). I think what this poster was getting at was that it wasn't worth it for the dad to get an above board job because the garnishment for back child support wouldn't leave him with enough money to live comfortably on.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 08:21 AM
1

I understand what you're saying about consistency, I get that. You're not wrong. But people change. The young 20-something may just not be interested in a long term relationship, so casual sex seems fine. Once she's done a bit of growing up she decides to find someone whose more interested in long-term relationships and not just sex. But myself and plenty of other women have been raised being told what guys who only want sex up-front aren't great for LTRs. This gets reinforced by guys who talk a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 12:13 AM
2

I had responded to: Do you not think the presence of a sexually appealing man greatly influences a woman's desire for sex? I was merely pointing out that sometimes the other circumstances happening in a woman's life can override their want to have sex, whether it's with a sexually appealing person or not. You dismissed my assertion that periods are a perfectly reasonable time for women to turn down sex they would have otherwise have had. I told you exactly why periods can kill a woman's libido. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/18 11:48 PM
2

Ever had a uterine cramp? They ain't fun. I've literally vomited from the pain. I have a friend whose cried putting a bra on because her nipples get so sensitive when she's on her period. Wake up so bloated that pants that fit yesterday are suddenly hard to button up. None of that makes a woman feel very turned on. You getting your dick wet isn't more important than a woman trying to deal with menstrual issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/18 11:19 PM
2

Men can present themselves as more desirable than they turn out to be. The guy who was really great on the first date can start exhibiting behaviors further on that may eventually repel a woman. Ex.: The guy who was great on the first date really interests his date, she then decides there may be something more worthwhile from this guy than a casual fuck. So she tries to get to know the guy better. A few dates on she realizes he's actually a slob and she has much higher standards for cleanliness …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/18 09:10 PM
2

It can. But it said woman is on her period (for example) and feeling like crap because of it the presence of a sexy man isn't necessarily going to encourage her to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/18 08:34 PM
2

It's crude to speak that way, but not harmful imo. Delivery can make the difference between scoring and striking out. I know women who just love sex and aren't terribly picky about who they'll have it with. But not one of those women would ever just up and bone the first guy who comes up and says, "ay, you want sum fuk?". Why? Because basic manners still apply to even casual sex partners. Starting with hello, introducing yourself politely, asking the woman if she'd like to speak with you go a lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 02:56 AM
3

I've had total strangers flip out on me twice, both times I was in high school. It was actually sympathetic actually nice men who saved the day for me, so to speak, by walking up and pretending to be with me so they could lead me away from the crazy pants men who were shouting at me. All praise to rational men, but I'm still going to be giving aggressively flirty guys some serious side eye. If I hadn't been in a crowded mall who knows what could have happened to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/18 02:50 AM
1

So you're lost then?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/18 06:36 PM
1

Interesting. I'll have to look more into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 05:15 AM
1

I'll have to check these out when I have more time, thanks for links.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 05:13 AM
2

Do you have any data to back that up? Because if we're talking about anecdotal observation, I've actually found the opposite to be true. Most people in my age group (early 30s) are just choosing to not get married at all. But of the people who choose to get married it's those who are in the lower income brackets that are toughing it out. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 03:04 AM
2

What do you mean by elite institution?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 02:10 AM
3

Just a quick thing to point out: This absolutely does happen. I can't speak to how often but it's not entirely unheard of for people to be so afraid of offending another person that they'd do something they really don't want to. Peer pressure and being confrontation-averse lead to all kinds of problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/18 02:12 AM
1

insist on more than one expression of consent per partner per lifetime. This very much reads, to me at least, as if someone has agreed once, they never have to again. It's also contradictory to what was stated in the OP, hence why I asked for clarification. Notions like what i had understood from the bit I quoted can be very dangerous, it's one way people wind up being raped by their own partners. "He/she said yes to me before, why should I ever have to ask again??" Moving on though: Nos need to…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/18 05:52 PM
1

You didn't answer my question. I'll rephrase: do you believe a partner has the right, for want of a better word, to not have sex with their partner even if they've consented in the past? I genuinely can't tell if I'm misunderstanding your statements or if you are indeed talking out both sides of your mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/18 09:27 PM
2

That's a rather scary statement. My husband is definitely the one who instigates sex more in our relationship and I'll usually roll with it. But by your account I would never be able to tell my husband no even if I'm sick or feeling completely gross because I'm on my period just because I had consented to sex at other times. The only way to ever turn my husband's advances down would be to separate or divorce. Am I misunderstanding you? You said in the OP that without an enthusiastic no, consent …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/18 06:41 PM
8

I never said it was the man's responsibility to be an "emotional tampon". I just pointed out that it's guys who get nasty about women rejecting them, as if it's the woman's responsibility to cater to the man's wants or needs, that get branded Nice Guys. Functional coed relationships don't have these problems because both sides understand that the other isn't beholden to them. If this were a Nice Girls conversation I'd say the same thing about the woman. She would have had to communicate poorly a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/18 05:15 AM
6

But why is it the woman's responsibility to fill whatever a supposed nice guy wants of her though? His lack of options isn't the woman's fault. I can imagine it's frustrating as hell but that doesn't make the woman a bitch for not reciprocating his feelings. In my experience, Nice Guys ™ tend to go off the rails when their plans fail. That's the major difference between a guy who is nice and a Nice Guy ™. I've encountered, and many of my female friends have also encountered, the guy who they tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/18 04:52 AM
6

He is also free to leave the relationship or withhold sex. If he wants an open relationship there are a decent number of women into that so find one of those women. Why should she be the only person expected to change? Your interpretation of the matter reads like a fundamental compatibility issue. Neither person is wrong for wanting what they want in a relationship but where it gets muddy is when someone tries to step outside their partner's boundaries. You'll either click or you won't. It's not…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 08:38 AM
8

If it's a full on "nice guy" we're likely very relieved.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 04:47 PM
2

That's what I've seen as well. Even inheritances that are gained during a marriage are generally not split during a divorce unless it's been used for marital costs. So upgrading the family home or buying a new car would get it tangled in a divorce but keeping it in a separate account and only using it for personal expenses is usually okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 03:25 AM
1

I think it partly revolves around the company you keep. Most of friends are in Long term relationships or don't date much at all. I haven't heard my friends say anything one way or the other about how much they do or don't care about their partners sexual past beyond STDs. Meanwhile, I've been out with my sister and her friends and heard guys complaining about how many partners their former dates had. Tripe like, "How's a woman gonna approach need knowing she's already fucked 15 guys?".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/17 03:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter