TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Head-Living2526 Archive

View 2 posts and 181 comments by Head-Living2526 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

LOL you don't have supreme confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 02:09 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 02:08 AM
1

LOL. I have travelled heaps and people who think they are interesting because they interacted with the locals or saw the temples are the most boring and cringe people ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 02:04 AM
3

hobbies do not make you interesting or individual. Most hobbies are generic and boring. This is the view of a boring person.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 02:03 AM
–

True. I guess no one is a natural leader to me and other people who aren't submissive. but if you are submissive, some people may be to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:56 AM
–

That's so weird and submissive. To like follow another person or be led by them. I simply don't get it. Maybe I am a natural leader because I've never felt the urge to be led by someone else. Feels weird. I don't understand others who pedalstalize other humans. I don't think I am very easily impressed though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 07:55 AM
1

How is what people think evidence? There are lots of commonly held but incorrect beliefs. Look at who is in office lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 04:49 AM
1

I really think it's a matter of personal preference if people would prefer to deal with issues of thirst versus issues of loneliness or zero attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 04:47 AM
1

Also. People on the internet speak about social situations so weirdly. I have never met someone who quietly commands respect unless: - In a work setting and they let the work speak for itself, but thats domain specific - you are in a physical setting and the man is clearly physically capable and imposing - he's really handsome and you're attracted, but he isn't doing anything differently. Quietly commanding respect is just a halo effect imo. This quiet confidence thing is such a cope that makes …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 04:46 AM
0

Shocking lack of insight here imo. All this means is dominance is something you allow a man to have, based on your level of agreeableness and submissiveness in relation to him. Nothing to do with the man's assertiveness himself. Natural leader is the absolute biggest lie I've ever heard in life. I have never met someone who is a natural leader or I feel inclined to follow. Regardless, a natural leader to you appears dominant to another woman and a natural leader to another woman may appear domin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 04:44 AM
–

I believe this happy single person in their 30's is such a new phenomena that we just don't know how it pans out. I am predicting a lot of very very angry men and women who feel conned by societies anti relationship sentiments and breakdown of social cohesion when it ends up too late to form a family and have kids in their late 30s. It's very easy, when you are late 20's and early 30's and your career is still relatively novel, your parents and family are still in decent health, your friends are…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 04:41 AM
2

gotta do what you gotta do, I support either method if you aren't able to build long term imrpovmemnt
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 02:43 AM
2

I think relationships are more important. I'd much rather have a hot woman I live with, than be able to vote. Also none of what you say is actually happening, it's just people saying it or posting it. Whereas many men are cripplingly lonely. I think reproducing and forming mating bonds is a bigger biological imperative than being able to vote or open a bank account, but each to their own. So yeah, I fundamentally disagree. Your's is a very woman-centric view.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 02:22 AM
2

Morally? Someone killing another is more immoral than "killing themselves". But this isn't a matter of morality, it's a matter of overall utility. A person who dies by suicide versus murder is as big a loss to society and loss of utility as someone dying by murder. The morality framing is irrelevant imo and comes from a childish and punitive spiteful mindset
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 09:00 AM
7

You have this weird duality that cannot co-exist going on. One side of you is all about logic, morality, empathy rationality, and factually proving who has it worse and helping based on that. Which is fair. But once you are presented good facts on men struggling, you kind of switch to a bit of a "oh well tough sh1t the world isn't fair or they bring it on themselves thing". But if these men switched to your same might is right philosophy its not going to end well for people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:42 AM
2

Framing it as simply upset is very invalidating. This sh1t leads to a high rate of suicide. I think loneliness that drives one to suicide is much worse than a bit of sexism
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:41 AM
5

Yet they publicly denounce these traits in certain winners like Trump. And claim men doing badly are doing so due to moral flaws, not due to a lack of selfishness and aggression
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 05:03 AM
2

Dark triad is correlated to life success. Unless you can find a way to argue dark triad is in fact not bad, how can you hold this position?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 05:01 AM
1

It's definitely a massive over exaggeration. There are different phenotypes of men who do well with women. Men who do well with the baddies and get lots of casual often are actually assholes. However, the type of guy who always seems to be in a LTR with an attractive and stable woman is often the most well adjusted guy. However, due to the nature of casual sex in the mid 2020's. A guy who is having regular casual sex is at least slightly assholish. You have to be. Women love it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 04:59 AM
2

Gay, feminine, or fat bubbly straight man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 04:46 AM
2

You operate on a world view comprised of (outdated) stereotypes. It's no wonder you think the way you do lol. People seek out romantic relationships in large part due to attraction, men are not attracted to men, so they wouldn't date them. it would be no different than a friendship
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 04:45 AM
–

Some are relieved, and many feel a degree of anguish and mortality about irreversible change and feeling more invisible and less relevant. Everyone is different. Yes men give this power. That is my point. What is given for free and is not based on any merit or morality can be taken away just as easily. My point is, don't complain about the shame single mothers and sluts receive when it is directly connected to a misuse of the position of privilege they had.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 04:40 AM
9

I see male loneliness as a bigger issue to prioritise. So if it has to come at expense of misogyny, so be it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:44 AM
1

Yes they do, everyone fucks hookers. No one respects them though, and if they hadn't fucked them, things would still be the same. what is your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:42 AM
1

carried? how is them busting a nut relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:42 AM
1

That's a massive massive massive stretch from showing they had an extremely extremely minor and anecdotal positive impact to claiming it was built on their backs
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:41 AM
1

US built on backs of sex workers lmaooo. you are regraded as bottom of society and I dont know anyone who would say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:40 AM
1

No one respects you
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:39 AM
1

ahahahah. above average level of intelligence. To do something that immediately and permanently puts you on the bottom of the social hierarchy? The only thing it's associated with is narcissism. As I find sex workers constantly unable to accept the basic fact that it would put them lower status in society. To claim you have to be smart is so funny when most get exploited and end up depressed after lmaoooo
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:39 AM
2

Where is your retort? All you've said is "nah uh". He got you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:36 AM
1

they are all low status jobs that you wouldn't be proud of
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:36 AM
2

Thank you. There is no male loneliness epidemic. biggest made up thing ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:35 AM
1

This is quite a lot of cope. There are arguments you could have made, but pretending sex workers aren't bottom of the social hierarchy is just... trying very hard. The sanitation industry is also worth billions by the way. I guess I "like" the women I bust nuts on a screen to (although this is super rare for me personally). But I don't respect her and I certainly consider myself and all the women in my life higher value and status than her. I see sex workers constantly mocked and shut down onlin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:28 AM
1

Women don't have more experience lol. They think getting handcuffed once on a one night stand means they have a wild past. I find most women very cute and naive when they think they have lived worldly and wild lives and its like taking MDMA once overseas lmaoooo
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:23 AM
1

Why is it gross? We don't employ people with face tattoos, or criminal history. Someone who does sex work shows a lack of foresight and discipline, and also a degree of greed. I also think they are selfish and immoral for bringing shame on their family like this. Seriously, if you have the option to have a non sex-worker employee, why wouldn't you? They deserve it more at the least, having never sacrificed morals or their families dignity for greedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:17 AM
2

I mean you can think what you want, but you have lower status in the eyes of 95% of society the moment you do sex work. Much less than most of the people on that list, except Gooners.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:15 AM
1

I think you're confused. I am very very happy to protect family such as Mother or Sister. Or a woman who has committed to me and loves me such as my wife or girlfriend. I have no interest in sacrificing anything for anyone else. I am worth much more to myself than any woman alive except my daughter or wife. I would never go to war for a woman I don't love. I would never risk my life for a strange woman. Wtf.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:13 AM
1

I always expose people, even strangers, for adultery or cheating if I can. I've only had the opportunity 3 times in my life, two were overseas with women cheating on their bf while partying, one was a friend of a friend who was in a relationship who slept with my friend's girlfriend. I've had intense arguments with people about this, but I've never been so morally sure about something. if someone is cheating, I expose them. if they want to get aggressive. I mean, good luck, I have years of boxin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:07 AM
1

Better comparisons. Btw I agree it's not for all of these. Is it transphobic to not date a trans woman? Is it misogynistic to reject women for not being virgins? For not giving head on the first date? Is it racist to to not want to date a women because she slept with a black guy before? Because she has black family members?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:03 AM
1

that is homophobic by definition imo. How can it not be?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:02 AM
1

I see it as exactly like body count debate. If you didn't know, it wouldn't matter, so why does it matter? Keep it a buck on this women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:01 AM
5

I mean, it's just basic fact. Depending on when it's brought up though, it can be considered a thinly veiled threat. I consider the fact that I can't walk through many areas of the world without being mauled by animals threatening, but I also like to know the truth and reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:57 AM
22

Haha you're missing his point. Why is misogyny a bigger issue than depressed isolated young men who are getting taking advantage of? It's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:55 AM
1

Most people believe that systemic racism/sexism etc is just made up academic gatekeeping from feminist elite in academia to stop people getting support and recognition. As a man. I don't care if it's systemic or not? If it has a negative impact on my emotions or outcomes or those of other men, I will act on it. You aren't going to convince people what to care about with buzzwords. The world has changed unfortunately, as you are seeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:53 AM
1

Firstly, I was not including you, so please don't say "we". I guarantee 99% of women posting here in PPD do not fall into the privileged group I mean. These are hot young women I am talking about, they don't use reddit, much less nerdy subreddits like this. And yes, it is unearned power. Your comment just seems to be agreeing that it is given to young women by men's lust, and is unearned. I don't understand your point? It is unearned and fragile as it's based on a very very narrow window of yout…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:44 AM
3

Are you asexual? People have friends for that. Sexual attraction changes everything and makes even small commonalties so much more meaningful
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:39 AM
1

Cmon. It's regarded as a bad thing by most of society, wrongly, but to have the label is an insult and lowers your status
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:38 AM
1

What does it matter if it's in isolation or systemic? the impact is the same on the person.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 04:34 AM
0

That is simply not true. we have a higher standard of living in almost all aspects
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 04:18 AM
0

agree, im young but we have it easier than any other population in history
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 04:17 AM
0

Never understood this view. As a young person, we have it better and easier than ever. Society just gets weaker each generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 04:17 AM
1

It is real life, but only real for a very short period of your life. approx age 18-32. Maybe far less if you settle down by mid to late 20s. Also your comment didn't address anything about young women's power, just said it is fragile, and so it should be when unearned.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 04:15 AM
–

Oh, they aren't talking about you, or guys with girlfriends lol. Any guy can get a girlfriend if he's willing to accept average. A typical guy in a typical relationship is likely less of a jerk than a single guy, or a player. They mean actual players (top 5%) who sleep with lots of women. And it's a mix of jealous projection, and also these men being able to get away with more bad behaviour (they don't have more bad behaviour, they just get let off of the bad behaviour they do show).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 04:10 AM
1

you too bro keep at it I like your mindset, it feels lonely in this sea of f-wits, but I cope by telling myself that we are hopefully all more similar than I think deep down
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:22 AM
2

Wtf im from Aus too and I thought it was a US thing. Now I am even more shocked by your views as a fellow Aussie. Most blokes here seem really social and sporty. Watching the NRL or AFL with mates, most blokes are pretty fit and in shape. You must not be from a capital city? I thought the geek stuff like DND was a USA thing, the men there seem so much more like... nerdy and unhealthy. But im shocked you have this view of Aussie men. I feel like we are social and sporty! If anything the problem i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:21 AM
1

Never ceases to surprise me. Similarly when the 6'3 jacked gymbro comes in looking intimidating but punches like a little girl and cant grapple to save his life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:17 AM
–

It's a matter of earned standing, where those who have demonstrated a failure to manage their own lives or respect social boundaries are justly disqualified from shaping the rules for everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:15 AM
–

Too logical. The argument for this is based on social stewardship: public discourse is a privilege earned through demonstrated responsibility and adherence to the community’s standards. If an individual has proven through their own actions that they lack foresight, discipline, or a moral compass, they have effectively forfeited their "seat at the table" and the right to influence the collective future of others. It's a matter of earned standing, where those who have demonstrated a failure to man…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:15 AM
1

Oh I feel the same often too. But I hear this mindset a lot, and I sometimes check myself when I have it. It's very easy to feel more intelligent, complex, and authentic than everyone else, but if we had access to their inner worlds and not just their actions we may feel different.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:10 AM
3

All of your "hobbies" are just you going to watch shows or movies or go and talk at lunch or a bar? It sounds like the makings of an exceptionally boring person. When do they do anyhrting that isnt just passively watching other peoples talent and gossiping about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:08 AM
5

A few things. Women do not go out and socialise and have fun more. Any stats on that? I see more women reporting anti depressant usage and isolation. Men have friendships that last longer on average too. I've had two girlfriends, they may post on instagram about lunch with Becky, but they come home complaining that Becky didn't ask a single question all brunch and just spoke about herself. My girlfriend was living a frustrated and boring life, but tried to project otherwise. Warhammer and DND ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:06 AM
-1

Two chronically online people trying to give advice about real world dating. no wonder you are still stuck here and make so many posts and comments Listen and learn more, and preach less. both of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:02 AM
3

unusually intelligent and creative, is a genuine possibility. Unusually arrogant and solipsistic could be another explanation. It's very common to perceive our own inner worlds as having more depth and complexity than those of others. I'm sure if you simply observed her lifestyle, she would seem similarly boring and simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:00 AM
7

You cant be serious. >50%. "I love to travel" "my personal hell is this app" " food, wine, doggos, and road trips" "If you voted trump swipe left" or no bio. Have you actually been on dating apps lol? Men aren't much better but you're just rage baiting at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 02:59 AM
8

The less visible guys are likely to know way more about this though???
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 02:57 AM
10

Not my experience at all. Any proof for this? The men I see attracting the most women have height, looks, or status. In fact the biggest players I know are the most boring, because they spend their time doing nothing but grooming and dating, don't have much knowledge or interesting hobbies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 02:55 AM
1

I mean I agree, but I don't think women are more interesting than men. In fact the stereotype I have internally is men tend to be more talented and dedicated at understanding and getting good at things, whereas I find women more boring, they go to lunch to socialise just to talk in circles. I think both genders are filled with extremely boring people. I find the average woman thinks that just being out and about in active wear and taking videos for their story equals an interesting life, but tal…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 02:54 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:48 AM
–

they are easier, quicker, more efficienct etc. You give most men a year to improve their social skills they can, completely in their control. Money? most people already earn as much as they can. Almost everyone in the world is trying to acquire money every moment. no one really gives a f about social skills except management execs, pick up artists, and university kids
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:44 AM
–

no one wants a boring woman like you
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:43 AM
–

he doesn't get dates he just poses online ignore him he's a troll
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:42 AM
–

No. Having a handsome face beats being tall every time. It is not even close. I don't know any super handsome guys not swimming in attention, I know so many tall losers who don't get any play.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:42 AM
–

men don't want to be in boring long term relationships where they get nothing but 3x a week duty sex. The stark minority of incels confuse you. most men are not simply happy to end up with some mid woman who doesn't even desire them enough to give them head multiple times a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:40 AM
–

Some reasons why: - Doing sex work is a low IQ choice. So people will dismiss your intelligence. One it is short sighted to ruin your entire reputation permanently for some quick money, it also indicates you don't have the intelligence, competence, or patience to make money in normal way. It's like getting a face tattoo, I guess itself doesn't really hurt anyone or mean anything, but the silly choice means a lot about you. - Sex work is pretty immoral imo. You bring shame on your parents and fam…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:37 AM
5

social skills are way way easier to improve imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 02:05 AM
25

I don't agree overall. Whenever someone points out a charismatic guy and he does well, he is at least above average. A below average or average man cannot be seen as charismatic, it just doesn't work. And even when it works, the attraction is different too and less primal. I've pulled women from game and seduction before, and I've pulled women from having a 6 pack and a sharp jawline. Pulling women from charisma is kind of like pulling them with money imo, it's a proxy for true attraction and de…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 02:04 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:03 AM
–

yeah I thought this too. why is it not their skin colour or country? thats a shared characteristic
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:03 AM
–

Why is the common characteristic their gender and not their race or culture? You can say, because no women are doing it, but I can say no white western men are involved. Why is it their maleness and not their Nigerian-ness?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:02 AM
1

psycho
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:59 AM
–

I won't lie it seems a little sad and pathetic. But it'll stop some inevitable violence which is a good thing overall, as I don't see many men just laying down quietly without reproducing, I think certain personality styles are vengeful and will go out with a bang. When it comes to sexual or mating things, people seem to switch their brain off. I agree with the other commenter that it reduces the relative value of women, and the drive to work hard and provide value to society. People don't like …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:31 AM
–

You are consistently missing the point. I am talking about attractiveness not age. Women have to settle on attractiveness as they age, as they are not able to pull as attractive men anymore, age aside.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:29 AM
–

If another man can beat you up, he's more masculine. End of story. You can't be more masculine than another man if he could take your life, your possessions, or beat your loved ones in front of you. That just doesn't compute.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:19 AM
–

My argument is that preference is an adjustment based on their position in the market, not true desire. These women are no longer in a position to demand or acquire the same types of men anymore. For what it's worth I'd argue most men aren't either, but due to testosterone they are more risk taking, and also more able to retain attractiveness longer. If you simply judge preferences by what people DO instead of what they truly want, then you'd assume most people prefer to live in mortgaged homes …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:06 AM
–

No it's the opposite (for some of us). I've had girlfriends and can get a new one easily. We don't like you acting like your girlfriend is a status symbol or giving advice if she isn't hot or doesn't truly desire you. Some of us come on here trying to learning more about dating psychology to attract baddies. Then people like you with mediocre relationships, with mediocre women try to give smug advice. It's irritating, it's like studying finance and some local cashier tries to get advice on getti…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 11:56 PM
–

Again, my comment clearly explained that the difference is not a lack of desire for attractive men (it's not based on age like for men but still looks etc) but a an inability to attract those men anymore. It's not a change in women's preferences, but a reduction in their available "budget" so to speak. They cannot afford the men they like anymore. People don't like cognitive dissonance. So they convince themselves the men they can get they like.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 11:51 PM
–

just because you and most women don't have insight into their processes of cognitive dissonance as they age and have to cope with an updated reality, doesn't mean we can't recognise it
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:58 AM
–

Massive cope lol. Quite childish really. "I know you are but what am I?" level.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:57 AM
-3

This doesn't address their concern. They very much know they can get a wife, like most guys. Their concern and argument is the wife doesn't desire her husband. Getting a wife is piss easy. Getting an attractive one or one who treats you well is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:56 AM
-2

You are so off base. I can guarantee they are not jealous of those men. They pity them. They don't think the man is happy. They are a doughy pudgy unattractive man getting used and settled for and it's their worst nightmare.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:55 AM
–

Because it's bullsh1t cognitive dissonance and we simply don't believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:53 AM
1

He's quite clear. Women are valued on their looks pretty much only. If a women's looks are not good, she doesn't have much value.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:37 AM
3

You said men not "a small subset of men"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:36 AM
1

I think most men don't have enough insight into themselves. They are disgusted by her narcissism and exhibitionism but they aren't articulate enough so they call her ugly, even though they know she isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:35 AM
2

You cannot group all women together. Women have wildly varying value based on age and attractiveness. When they say women have natural value, they mean average looking women aged (approximately) 18-26 who are in their prime do not have to do anything. They don't mean your average or even above average 32 year old women lmao. That's the entire point, they are trying to humble women who are not in that group anymore from acting like they are. Maybe they were, but time has past, aging has happened.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:34 AM
–

Violent (I really meant athletic people capable of violence) people have power, they can enforce laws and morals, they can show off athletic prowess, they can inspire and teach others to improve their body and health. But really I meant talented people. There is no power in sex. There is no benefit to society. It's a private act that can't really be shared. We all engage in it. Everyone can do it. I am not saying to disempower sex, just there is nothing powerful in it. There is no skill, power, …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 12:09 AM
7

I don't see how this is a debate. People don’t hate sex I never said that and obviously sex is everywhere in media and advertising. But that’s not the same thing as wanting to hear about specific people’s private sex lives Most people treat sex as a private and intimate activity. Just because something is common doesn’t mean people want it discussed in detail in casual day to day conversation. That’s also why the sports comparison doesn’t really work either. Things like athletic ability or music…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 09:14 AM
-1

You have very black and white thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 09:07 AM
-1

I agree it's sexist on a societal level, shouldn't be shamed, and shouldn't be framed as a negative to have a high body count. But on a one to one level, it's a personal preference just like anything else that would make someone date or not date someone. Like, eating lots of junk food isn't good for you, but we shouldn't shame and abuse those who do so. But people still have the right to not want to date someone who does it. There is a difference between like society level and individual prefere…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 07:15 AM
6

I have sex regularly, also a man. Also hated hearing about other people's sexual experiences, and don't like sharing mine. I don't want to hear about anyone else's sex life lol. I'm confused what your point is?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 07:06 AM
3

You people must connect with your partners on a much more surface level. When I get in a relationship, you share everything, and you don't lie. You should not deceive someone into being with you if the truth would mean they wouldn't be with you. If it's just casual it's one thing, but it's incredibly evil to let a man marry you, whilst lying about your past. Thankfully there are plenty of aggressive and high justice sensitivity who are willing to be confrontational to expose people like this, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 07:05 AM
0

Wtf no. There is no one size fits all for relationships. This is terrifying. No sh1tty 60k a year checked out schoolteacher is ever teaching my son or daughter about relationships. It's the parents job 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:30 AM
6

I see women always say what makes a real man, or trying to say what real masculinity is, even though they have no experience of masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:28 AM
0

because we are always more assertive, confident, and decisive than our partners
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:26 AM
12

No, I don't think it's anything to do with framing, most people just don't want to hear about other people's sex lives. Also a violent man who is athletically capable is very impressive and also USEFUL to society. Someone who is very kinky doesn't really provide or indicate any value whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:25 AM
–

and back to the original. most people are kind of shitty and most men are kind of desperate
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:22 AM
1

I don't think so at all. Shows how you can age if you really put time and energy into it. Disregarding fillers and surgeries.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 09:08 AM
1

I believe most men do not end up getting to marry to partner up with the women they truly want. I guess more men just settle and become mediocre and sub-clinically depressed than desperate, as they give up. But a lot of men who aren't partnered up are definitely desperate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 07:25 AM
1

I agree with your broader sentiment. This just isn't true though. “Men” are not desperate. You, a person who is a man, are desperate. Every time you wrote something about “men” you were actually just making an “I Am” statement." One, there is a good amount of data showing that many men ARE desperate and experiencing negative emotions as a result of lack of actual or perceived dating opportunity. Two, you are saying no one can ever make claims about groups of people, which is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 07:12 AM
3

I don't get this take. People are individuals. If they aren't happy with the trade, leave. I do believe that as we become more aware of each gender/sexes true intentions and mechanisms of love and romance, most relationships cannot last though. The cat's out the bag: women have seen how men pursue beautiful women, men have seen how women treat "high-value" guys. If you aren't getting that treatment from your partner, move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 07:10 AM
7

High ranking reddit commenter with 15k contributions giving patronising life and dating advice about attracting women. The irony writes itself. There are some men who screen and reject women, it's not plenty, men are DESPERATE out here it's hard to deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 07:08 AM
1

I am challenging the view, just directly. I am claiming the assumptions underpinning their view aren't satisfied. Do I need to provide stats that it's men who are viewed as the more romantic gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:12 AM
2

Because it's fucking depressing for someone to be attracted to you based on a combination of such minor and common traits. I just don't feel like it's real or what I would look for in a life partner if someone likes me due to my combination of my favourite food, favourite show, indoor vs outdoor preference, extraversion vs. intraversion. They are such boring and meaningless traits that are possessed by such large swaths of people. I also fail to see, what differentiates a romantic partner from a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:50 AM
2

I think that's the fundamental problem with lot's of modern dating. Most men don't feel attractive enough to women or their partners to inspire any sort of of genuine desire and attraction. It's all mediated through investment, companionship, and other variables. Very depressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:37 AM
–

again. everyone does a subconscious status assessment, I dont really care about opinions on that, it's just a proven human cognitive process and any group mammal does it. But what you are saying is there are no conscious thoughts about status or hierarchy when interacting which is what Im curious of, the self-awareness of said processes. Thanks for the info!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:27 AM
4

I mean, quite a longwinded post for a simple concept. People are genuinely way too sure of their beliefs in almost all aspects. The only people claiming to have fully cracked the code are the redpill grifters. But being such an important goal to date or get laid for a lot of men, they are certainly going to try. It seems reasonable to use outcomes, i.e. the attributes and behaviours of men who get the desired outcomes, as a data point. Asking people has its own flaws. People have limited insight…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 11:26 AM
2

passion and attraction comes before those things. thats the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 11:16 AM
1

The choice of romantic partner is one of the biggest determinants of life satisfaction if you partner up. The quality hugely varies. Many men end up with terrible wives. Men want to end up with a good wife, whatever that personally means to them. For many men, their current strategy and what society has taught them is not working to attain their goal. There is very much a scarcity of and competition for partners, if someone is with someone else, you can't be with them, and eventually all you hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:52 AM
1

If I inferred that it meant that she would not be physically attracted to me on looks alone, then yes, definitely, it would actually make me reconsider what her attraction to me is even based on.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:38 AM
-5

But none of that is relevant to love at all. None of those make you fall in love with someone. Or have passion or desire for them. They help in compatibility and sustainability and companionship once spark/chemistry/attraction/love has occurred.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:13 AM
2

Your definition of love sounds like a very passionless and companionship oriented model. None of those traits will make someone deeply desire you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 08:41 AM
-1

Yeah let's all just change our fundamental biology. This isn't something that's changeable. Btw, personality is the biggest crap ever. Everyone's supposed "unique" peronsality is so similar. Like IDGAF if someone likes horse riding over tennis, or red over green, or they are extroverted and not introverted. These are such basic non sexualised differences. Such nonsense. No one is unique, we are all just slightly different variations of one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 08:36 AM
1

I disagree that everyone ages poorly, though most do. Some men are hotter at 32 than 24. I am way way more handsome at 29 than at 24 for example. The reason I am suggesting you are emotional is because your argument is jumping around. Before you said before most men over 30 are balding, wrinkled, and fat. So a hot 38 year old man who still has hair will absolutely be a far more attractive option than them. Now you say the 38 year old will be out competed by these fat, bald, wrinkled 32 year olds…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 07:48 AM
1

I feel like I am talking to a wall. 38 year old men do not want 21 year old women, and vice versa. What 38 year old man wants a 21 year old unless he's a complete loser who didn't live his youth at all. What are you talking about? I am 29 and I wouldn't want a 21 year old. 25 year old women are way hotter and way more compatible and more chemistry for example. When I am 38 I imagine I would prefer a 32 year old to a 25 year old. We don't disagree. However, what I am trying to explain to you is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 07:41 AM
2

It's made up..
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 07:29 AM
1

That's the thing, and again, I'm not trying to speak for you. But on YouTube or instagram etc. most people are hotter than average. It becomes the new norm. The fact we don't even notice it is worrying, because people who content create are a fair bit more attractive than the average person on average. For you it's fine, but its not uncommon for people to spend more time seeing faces online than in real life, and that will really make things hard in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 07:27 AM
1

you also mix up your ideas a bit. If the average man is SO UGLY by his mid 30s, which I do agree. A man who is, in your own words, hot, is going to be such a prize relatively and is going to exhibit massively healthy genes
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 07:24 AM
1

I don't think your thinking is flexible enough for this. I have no idea how old you are but no one cares what YOU think is old or what you are attracted to. Early 30s women would damn near put another women in hospital for an attractive late 30s man who is well rounded career and mental health. I think you aren't old enough to realise just how few quality options women have for men. It's really dire out there. Most men are ugly, fat, balding by 35. A man who isnt, is HOT AF and dominates the dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 07:23 AM
1

I agreed before to some extent, even though not really. but times have changed. With new research out now, men are waking up to the reality and are far less happy in relationships now that they know what women did through their 20s. Also most men are not happy to be with their wife. The trope of the husband complaining about his wife is 50 years old and is everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 04:02 AM
2

You may be different, but most women feel they do not encounter very many hot men day to day in real life. That's his point. It leads women to overestimate the amount of hot men, and the standards for men. Just like watching porn makes you overestimate how many attractive and sexual women there are, and raise the standards for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 04:00 AM
3

Hey I agree with you. But it's a matter of degrees. Many men would never be considered attractive no matter what. But if we crudely use numbers, I feel that men in that 50-80th percentile of hotness are the one's who are overlooked because women are social media brained and used to looking at perfect looking faces. Hell I am a guy and I can feel the effect of social media on me, average women seem ugly to me now, and thats not right.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:58 AM
3

No one should settle but only 10% of people get the choice not to if they want to be in a relationship and they care about looks on some level. I am a guy, I reckon I am probably 80th percentile in looks, but I'm still never quite satisfied with the quality of women I can reliably attain. The women I truly want to be with just don't quite want me enough or treat me poorly, and the women who are really keen on me just aren't quite attractive enough to me to commit to them or be truly excited abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:56 AM
2

You are being childish in the sense you are letting your emotions (in this case a sense of competitiveness or resentment towards men) reduce the accuracy of your claims. I totally agree that men who are attractive late 30's who think a woman 26 or below could find them hot is delusional, even though lots of men seem to think it's their prime. I am saying you are just factually incorrect to think that a hot late 30s guy is not an absolute prize for women in their late 20s and early 30s. You said …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:45 AM
–

I guess I'm interested in specific differences or aspects of status that women especially care about between each other. For example, one of if not men's biggest dominance or status indicators is how dangerous/good at fighting/strong/physically dominant they are. Women seem to completely not have this at all as a status indicator. Like I'd even argue against some of the one's you have for men ranking other men, I don't think being popular as a guy gives you much status as we don't really care ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:37 AM
–

Please explain, because social evaluation is not up for debate. What do you judge on then? Firstly, every single person does some sort of unconscious status and power assessment when they meet someone. Even if you don't know it, you encode "is this person police, government, are they rich or poor, could they physically hurt me, do they seem mentally stable, are they attractive, are they nice" and you encode a bit of a value judgement of them. In seconds. It's a basic survival mechanism. It shows…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:22 AM
–

Firstly, every single person does some sort of unconscious status and power assessment when they meet someone. Even if you don't know it, you encode "is this person police, government, are they rich or poor, could they physically hurt me, do they seem mentally stable, are they attractive, are they nice" and you encode a bit of a value judgement of them. In seconds. It's a basic survival mechanism. It shows a lack of self-awareness to claim otherwise. But I was asking if there is any explicit awa…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:21 AM
2

It's ironic that every guy I've ever seen who is "into fat women" is never a guy who has the option to get an attractive fit woman. It's kind of like some middle class person saying they'd prefer not to be a millionaire and prefer their cosy 2 bedroom house. I mean.... sure. We all believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:19 AM
2

Stupid comment. About 50% of comments on this subreddit are people making gendered claims about what men/women do/like/want/hate. No one is in a position to speak about anyones preferences if we want to get down that lane of thinking. But that's not what this is for, we are discussing ideas
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:18 AM
1

Good call. I guess as you said, you'd kind of need to be with the same people for extended periods for that to form, like school, which doesn't happen much as an adult
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 09:49 AM
2

We can possible make it 30 for certain women, I mean the strict number isn't the point, just that it's a small amount of one's overall lifespan. Also, human eyes and senses are remarkably effective at picking up health and fertility cues, and it only takes subtle collagen loss and slight fat pad distribution to create a real loss of vibrancy and youth
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 09:44 AM
2

There are plenty of men who are hot in their late 30's from the perspective of women in their late 20s and definitely early 30s. You are just being childish and unreasonable to say otherwise and it doesn't match reality. No I do not think women 18-27 or so will find a 38 year old man attractive, nor will 30 year old women find a 45 year old man hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 09:39 AM
6

Oh, I definitely agree that people shouldn't be commenting on specific people's preferences. I mean that's a really rude and aggressive thing to do, can't imagine that going down well. I just saw your tag. The trans side of thing deserves it's own entire debate cause there's a whole world of internalised homophobia and culture war all of that to unravel when it comes to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 06:19 AM
1

He can have developed feelings for her. People are simply pointing out that he would prefer it if she was thinner, or hotter, and when he claims he likes her just the way he is, he may even believe that, but it isn't true. It's not that hard to understand. Same logic as people who say "oh I wouldn't want to be a millionaire, I'm happy with what I've got"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 06:14 AM
1

The point is that those other men do not prefer fat women or those other attributes, but need to take what they can get. These supposed "weird standards" are actually standards most men have, but in reality people need to compromise. Have you read about cognitive dissonance? It's a very powerful psychological effect and explains why people will claim and even believe that they truly don't want a fitter/richer/kinder partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 05:53 AM
3

no one should shame anyone so I agree overall. But when people discuss things more privately on forums they are looking to reach a level of objective truth, and in reality a lot of people are not trying to police anyone, they just truly believe that if a man could partner up a fitter/hotter/low body count/whatever desirable attribute, they would but that people have to compromise and accept what they can actually attain. If we were talking about subjective things like extraversion vs introversio…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 05:49 AM
2

Ok let me explain. When two men meet each other, there is a sort of sizing up that happens across attributes internally: physique/size/strength/fighting ability, career/wealth, looks/access to women/charisma, overall status. Sometimes it's a close match and it can lead to friendship or rivalry, sometimes there is a clear difference that emerges along attributes. Both across friendship groups and within there are hierarchies. There are friendship groups full of taller, better looking, richer men …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 04:04 AM
2

Thanks for the thorough response, it's great to get insight into it. You view the world in a pure way, and I hope there are many more like you. I am hoping it's an age thing, because in my late 20's still, the more attractive people tend to dominate social groups and have more friends and people want to talk to them and defer more, no matter the context.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 04:00 AM
3

That's such a weird way to interpret it though. You are the one shaming men for having a preference and policing their tastes. No one should be shaming anyone, but judging is different. People have things they judge all the time. Women don't like short men. I think that's completely reasonable and fine for a woman to judge a short man as less masculine, or sexy, or less valuable partner. Men are not trying to make sleeping around illegal, but it's an unattractive behaviour that reduces how attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:58 AM
11

This post is a thinly veiled attempt to disguise clearly less sexually attractive characteristics behind socialisation etc. You can argue things like willingness to sleep early are neutral, but the rest are clear negatives. Well yes, it's well established a large part of sexual marketplace dynamics related to intrasexual status. Status leads to more access to resources and networks. A higher value woman (all things being equal: more feminine, better shape, hotter, less sexual history, clearly in…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:54 AM
1

It doesn't read that way. It comes across as weirdly misplaced aggression towards people at the bottom of society that can't get sex. You are literally bullying the most ugly and mentally impaired segment of society and insulting them because they can't get sex. In this case for no real reason. There is not a hint of productivity or maturity in your comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:46 AM
1

And another reply trying to convince me you don't care. The irony of having the last word to tell me I can have it. Deep breaths and a shower will help sweetheart. It's just a reddit comment
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:10 AM
1

No, I am saying, the statistics show that more men than women are forgoing relationships. The whole "women are quitting relationships" is just women over 30 who can't get what they want, complaining online. I can provide statistics showing women are seeking them more than men are. I think it's the opposite, men will not commit to women over 30 anymore now for anything but casual they have seen the reality of dating. Women are immaturely reacting to it by saying "I didn't want you anyway". Reddit…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:08 AM
1

I'm not arguing with you at all, and I appreciate the insight. Maybe I'm just off, but I do perceive power differentials among groups of female friends, or in workplaces, or different settings. Certain women dominate the group more, get heard more, seem to control the plans etc. Maybe it's in my head, and it's not as clear and structured as for men, but it still seems to be there in a different form, which is what I was trying to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:05 AM
3

I agree with you to an extent. But even if you're in a university lecture and a quite unfortunate man or woman is really intelligent there, or they are the best at your rock climbing group, they still don't really have more status than someone with more enduring characteristics there, at least thats not how my brain processes it. A crude example, I can join a tennis club, and a guy could be the best there by far and win 6-0, 6-0 every time. but if he is short, bald, unemployed, virgin, even with…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:03 AM
0

I mean status is multi faceted and not just looks. I mean what makes a woman have higher social status among other women?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:01 AM
2

I've definitely noticed, even in adult groups of women, there are women who seem to have higher social standing. Are you saying that's not a thing? I agree it doesn't seem based on being the best. Im asking what it is based on? I mean an extreme example is other adult woman in their 30s who will fangirl someone like Taylor swift or Beyonce, by definition putting themselves below another woman. But I assume this happens on a smaller scale too?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:00 AM
1

I totally get its invisible to men, which is why im curious. You've shared a few factors: community involvement. Saying it's related to social standing is circular, what determines the social standing? Cause as a guy I've noticed the same thing. Often the guys women crush on are not particularly high status among men. Jacob Elordi types seem to get heaps of women but aren't really respected by other men, men who are high status among men are more Lebron James, or Conor MCgregor, khabin, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:59 AM
2

Read the room and don't say stupid stuff --> Emotional intelligence and to some degree general intelligence? Look pretty --> looks and genes and style choice? Don't be embarrassing to be seen with --> combination of above good looks and good social skills. So looks, emotional intelligence, and social skills. It's pretty obvious really when put that way, although I am surprised women care about each others prettiness so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:57 AM
1

I'm curious about your response. My questions are genuine. Why is context inherently different or different at all between a 24 and 32 year old? And what is different about the context? How is it relevant to hierarchy? I'm unclear about your reply. Are you saying there isn't social hierarchy for women? I mean you know better than me, but I've definitely noticed certain women being dominant over others and having more social power and respect, I was more just trying to work out what gives one sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:55 AM
1

The funny thing is that the whole “I don’t care or I never asked” line doesn’t really land when you’re clearly invested enough to reply and start bringing up violence and abuse. That’s kind of the textbook passive-aggressive move, acting all dismissive while still engaging and being emotional. Add in the forced emojis If you were actually indifferent, I’d believe you. But writing multiple responses while insisting you don’t care just reads as the opposite. It does make this more rewarding, so th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:59 AM
1

I agree that most men are not prizes. Most women aren't either. The only prizes are: - hot young women 18-25 or so - High status men who have some high combination or extreme level in one area of wealth, looks, fame/status/competence/charisma. Outside of this, I don't see any evidence of average men thinking owning a home makes them high value, but since most women do want to start a family and get married, it does increase their compatibility and desirability in the eyes of women. But if you're…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:56 AM
2

I am not strongly tied to either view, I was just reading the comments and yours seemed out of place, like you have this anger you need to unload at incels or red pill, but it was misplaced here. I also dont get it. I pity incense and dudes who are desperate to get laid, why are you trying to mock these types of people? Surely you hate on people who actually have agency in life and are doing bad things. not desperate people who have nothing going for them. Make me think you are not doing too wel…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:38 AM
0

It is a cool story, glad it seems to have struck a nerve by your pissy response. I agree that men do all those things? Men are definitely more violent and criminal and abusive, not sure on the cheating though, pretty established to be 50.50 and I'd guess its higher for women these days. But that wasn't my point. My point was, I agree with you women are only the prize from 18-25, but they need to accept that drop off afterwards and stop having tantrums. Pretty cool story by you too, although irre…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:36 AM
–

I don't really agree that looks fade in a partner sense. You may think all 50 year olds look the same, but I reckon when you're at 50, you have just as much variance ion attractiveness. People dont just stop having nice facial structure to look at as they get wrinkled imo. Like yes they dont look hot like a young person, but an ugly person at 45 is way uglier than someone else at 45 imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:34 AM
–

All 3 suck, but Option 2 is by far the worst. Attractiveness is the most important thing to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:32 AM
-1

Women do not "choose" to stay single. So tired of this myth. More women are in relationships than men, at least in their 20s. Provide some data or facts for your opinion, instead of women above 30 who no one wants anyway claiming to be single by choice (again we don't care, you've lost all fertility cue and we as men no longer get a chemical surge looking at your face).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:30 AM
-1

I agree. Young women are the prize. It's undeniable. They turn heads and open doors. Women here seem to cope with that fact. Because I don't see women in their 30s doing so. Women are the prize from 18-25, then everyone except the most exceptional few past 25 become invisible and meaningless. It's this slipping into mediocrity and irrelevance that women seem to struggle with as they age. I see them fight tooth and nail to claim "I get more attention than ever, im happier or hotter than ever". Ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:27 AM
-1

We need to separate attractive young women from other women. It really only is a very short period women are desired just for being. Women who aren't in the hot category past age 25 only get attention from men who are worthless. I've seen most men around me, they are pathetic. Their attention means nothing, if you don't get attention from high value men, you are valueless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:22 AM
0

It's more my looks, physique, and career that make me top 10%, that and the lack of genuine male competition. That said, being on the property ladder with something worth over 800k in a capital Australian city in your late 20's is a huge flex and source of status, most people are whining about renting still. Anyway, this wasn't really meant to be about me personally, although I am more than happy to brag. It's more about how hilarious it is when average women in their 30s and beyond use the word…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:20 AM
0

I mean I personally am pretty hot and saving for a mortgage so I probably just make the top 10% cut off, but I do agree that majority of men don't. My point is also that most women don't. I find both genders have people using the "we" word and it makes me laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:05 AM
1

he gets heaps of action I reckon. how could you possibly know?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:01 AM
3

You’re not responding to his point at all. You’re just unloading a rant about incels that you seem weirdly obsessed with. lol comes off like you’ve got some personal chip on your shoulder you’re projecting into the thread such a useless contribution
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 12:00 AM
0

I always find this hilarious when women who are not in the cohort, hot young 18-25 year olds. There is no "we". YOU are irrelevant. We only care about hot young women, you aren't denying anyone anything. What people also fail to realise is, if you have the bottom 90% of losers chasing you, it literally means nothing. There is an over abundance of sperm and bad sex, so stop acting like you have options when all you have are ugly men, mentally ill, low income etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 11:47 PM
3

This is just bitter cope. A hot guy in his late thirties? He doesn't need his pick of divorced middle aged women. A hot late 30's man? Early 30s women would absolutely love to lock down that man for their first marriage, some late 20s women even. Do you people live in the real world? You said hot btw. So we aren't assuming an average man. Look at brad Pitt in Troy. He is 41 there.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 11:45 PM
8

I think he's differentiating casual sex from long term commitment. This is all well and good in our 20s, but what happens from 30 onwards? This is unprecedented and there are going to be SO MANY lonely women and men. However, absolutely nothing can be done. This is human nature
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 06:07 AM
–

That's incredibly narcissistic and egotistical though and not true, it's a view that you need to hold to cope. Men are genuinely disgusted by seriously dating promiscuous women, the whole they are insecure is true, but they are insecure compared to high value men, they are not jealous of the women, do you know what jealousy means? Don't get me wrong, men want to be able to sleep around, but they aren't jealous of the women doing so, they pity them, they are jealous of the Alpha's who get all the…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 02:52 AM
0

Lol, you're the equivalent of the 45 year old dad talking about college football days. You are too old to participate at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:52 AM
1

I don't understand though. Isn't blue pill about looks not mattering? I also don't understand the phrase aiming "lower" what do you even mean? Who is lower? What is lower? I thought a blue pill view didn't create a social hierarchy between people. I'm essentially just curious about your world view and trying to understand it, since lots of people share it. You seem to both rate peoples value and looks, but you are blue pill? I disagree that people around them have a cohesive view of their person…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:45 AM
2

Whats with this strange characterisation of men insulting women as "jealous" and "insecure" but women doing it are "cruel and mean". It's so odd. I don't know what world you guys live in, but in my day to day in a major western city, young women do not come across as these confident powerful baddies slapping men down. They come across as anxious, screen addicted, and sluggish, like young men. It all comes from insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:38 AM
1

It's really weird to hear a blue pill person describe others as "losers" and ask people to date in their league. Aren't you guys all about everyone has unique value and there are no leagues and just be kind and confident? If you believe his looks puts him below other people, thats black pill? I don't think you can be a 3/10 in personality by the way, it's all alignment. Personality is inherently almost entirely subjective. You simply cannot rate that. People have literal polar opposite preferenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 10:09 PM
1

I love seeing the reality of blue pill. It's a hierarchy, just a different kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 10:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter